
                # Interation 0

                ## Task Info
                You are investigating a biological system where all species are observable. Your goal is to discover the missing reactions. You do not need to add new species.


                ## Incomplete SBML Model. You can assess it as input_sbml_string.

                <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<sbml xmlns="http://www.sbml.org/sbml/level2/version4" level="2" version="4">
  <model id="id_ug65">
    <listOfUnitDefinitions>
      <unitDefinition id="id_osbk">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="litre" exponent="1" scale="-3" multiplier="1"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
      <unitDefinition id="id_6seq">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="mole" exponent="1" scale="-3" multiplier="1"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
      <unitDefinition id="id_avhw">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="second" exponent="1" scale="0" multiplier="86400"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
    </listOfUnitDefinitions>
    <listOfCompartments>
      <compartment id="id_kxtm" spatialDimensions="3" size="1" constant="true"/>
    </listOfCompartments>
    <listOfSpecies>
      <species id="id_3fdc" compartment="id_kxtm" initialConcentration="1" boundaryCondition="false" constant="false"/>
      <species id="id_obek" compartment="id_kxtm" initialConcentration="0" boundaryCondition="false" constant="false"/>
      <species id="id_e6fd" compartment="id_kxtm" initialConcentration="0" boundaryCondition="false" constant="false"/>
      <species id="id_36d9" compartment="id_kxtm" initialConcentration="0" boundaryCondition="false" constant="false"/>
      <species id="id_8mtc" compartment="id_kxtm" initialConcentration="0" boundaryCondition="false" constant="false"/>
    </listOfSpecies>
  </model>
</sbml>


                ## Max iterations
                20

                Format your response according to the instructions in the system message.
                
## Thoughts
The current model has five species with only initial concentrations defined but no reactions. To understand the biological system's dynamics and identify missing reactions, I need to observe the system's behavior over time with the default initial concentrations. This will provide time-series data for all species, which I can analyze to infer possible reactions or transformations between species.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
  "action": "observe",
  "meta_data": {}
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_0
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_0]

Total size: 288 rows × 6 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_0] for the full data

Time    id_3fdc  id_obek  id_e6fd  id_36d9  id_8mtc
0   1.00e+00        0        0        0        0
...
8.71e-02   9.86e-02 2.18e-03 6.85e-01 1.64e-01 5.03e-02
...
1.74e-01   9.71e-03 1.02e-02 5.25e-01 3.57e-01 9.85e-02
...
2.61e-01   9.57e-04 2.19e-02 3.62e-01 4.94e-01 1.21e-01
...
3.48e-01   9.44e-05 3.49e-02 2.49e-01 5.89e-01 1.27e-01
...
4.36e-01   9.30e-06 4.80e-02 1.75e-01 6.55e-01 1.22e-01
...
5.23e-01   9.17e-07 6.03e-02 1.25e-01 7.01e-01 1.13e-01
...
6.10e-01   9.04e-08 7.16e-02 9.16e-02 7.35e-01 1.02e-01
...
6.97e-01   8.91e-09 8.16e-02 6.85e-02 7.60e-01 9.01e-02
...
7.84e-01   8.79e-10 9.04e-02 5.22e-02 7.79e-01 7.87e-02
...
8.71e-01   8.74e-11 9.81e-02 4.06e-02 7.93e-01 6.82e-02
...
9.58e-01   1.33e-11 1.05e-01 3.21e-02 8.04e-01 5.87e-02
...
1.05e+00   1.52e-12 1.10e-01 2.58e-02 8.13e-01 5.04e-02
...
1.13e+00   1.50e-14 1.15e-01 2.09e-02 8.21e-01 4.30e-02
...
1.22e+00   5.90e-14 1.19e-01 1.72e-02 8.27e-01 3.67e-02
...
1.31e+00   2.59e-14 1.23e-01 1.42e-02 8.32e-01 3.12e-02
...
1.39e+00  -1.05e-14 1.26e-01 1.18e-02 8.36e-01 2.66e-02
...
1.48e+00  -2.10e-15 1.29e-01 9.84e-03 8.39e-01 2.26e-02
...
1.57e+00  -1.85e-15 1.31e-01 8.25e-03 8.42e-01 1.92e-02
...
1.66e+00  -2.83e-15 1.33e-01 6.93e-03 8.44e-01 1.63e-02
...
1.74e+00   4.66e-16 1.34e-01 5.83e-03 8.46e-01 1.38e-02
...
1.83e+00  -4.33e-16 1.35e-01 4.92e-03 8.48e-01 1.17e-02
...
1.92e+00   2.62e-16 1.37e-01 4.15e-03 8.49e-01 9.91e-03
...
2.00e+00  -1.35e-16 1.38e-01 3.51e-03 8.51e-01 8.40e-03
...
2.09e+00   6.53e-17 1.38e-01 2.97e-03 8.52e-01 7.12e-03
...
2.18e+00  -3.95e-17 1.39e-01 2.51e-03 8.52e-01 6.03e-03
...
2.26e+00   2.46e-17 1.40e-01 2.13e-03 8.53e-01 5.11e-03
...
2.35e+00  -1.43e-17 1.40e-01 1.80e-03 8.54e-01 4.33e-03
...
2.44e+00   6.43e-18 1.41e-01 1.52e-03 8.54e-01 3.67e-03
...
2.53e+00  -1.51e-17 1.41e-01 1.29e-03 8.55e-01 3.11e-03
...
2.61e+00  -2.52e-17 1.41e-01 1.09e-03 8.55e-01 2.64e-03
...
2.70e+00   1.48e-18 1.41e-01 9.26e-04 8.55e-01 2.23e-03
...
2.79e+00   3.00e-19 1.42e-01 7.84e-04 8.56e-01 1.89e-03
...
2.87e+00  -3.93e-18 1.42e-01 6.64e-04 8.56e-01 1.60e-03
...
2.96e+00   2.22e-18 1.42e-01 5.63e-04 8.56e-01 1.36e-03
...
3.05e+00  -2.51e-19 1.42e-01 4.77e-04 8.56e-01 1.15e-03
...
3.14e+00  -1.16e-18 1.42e-01 4.04e-04 8.56e-01 9.75e-04
...
3.22e+00   9.84e-19 1.42e-01 3.42e-04 8.56e-01 8.26e-04
...
3.31e+00  -8.81e-20 1.42e-01 2.90e-04 8.57e-01 7.00e-04
...
3.40e+00  -2.87e-19 1.42e-01 2.46e-04 8.57e-01 5.93e-04
...
3.48e+00   3.12e-19 1.43e-01 2.08e-04 8.57e-01 5.02e-04
...
3.57e+00  -1.22e-19 1.43e-01 1.76e-04 8.57e-01 4.26e-04
...
3.66e+00  -8.84e-20 1.43e-01 1.49e-04 8.57e-01 3.61e-04
...
3.75e+00   1.10e-19 1.43e-01 1.27e-04 8.57e-01 3.06e-04
...
3.83e+00  -5.37e-20 1.43e-01 1.07e-04 8.57e-01 2.59e-04
...
3.92e+00  -1.24e-20 1.43e-01 9.09e-05 8.57e-01 2.19e-04
...
4.01e+00   3.92e-20 1.43e-01 7.70e-05 8.57e-01 1.86e-04
...
4.09e+00  -2.08e-20 1.43e-01 6.52e-05 8.57e-01 1.57e-04
...
4.18e+00   3.72e-22 1.43e-01 5.53e-05 8.57e-01 1.33e-04
...
5.00e+00   6.87e-22 1.43e-01 1.16e-05 8.57e-01 2.81e-05

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 20/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 1
## Thoughts
The observation data shows the dynamics of all species over time starting from initial conditions where only species id_3fdc is present. The concentration of id_3fdc decreases rapidly, while the other species increase in concentration at different rates. This suggests a sequential or branched reaction network where id_3fdc is converted into other species.

From the data:
- id_3fdc decreases from 1 to near 0.
- id_obek increases initially and then plateaus around 0.14.
- id_e6fd increases to about 0.085 and then decreases slowly.
- id_36d9 increases steadily to about 0.85.
- id_8mtc increases to about 0.03 and then decreases slowly.

This pattern suggests a possible reaction chain or network where id_3fdc is converted into id_obek, which then converts into id_e6fd, and then into id_36d9, with some side reactions involving id_8mtc.

To better understand the relationships and infer reactions, I will analyze the time series data by plotting and calculating correlations and possible reaction directions. This will help hypothesize the missing reactions.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Access the experiment data
df = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Plot the time series of all species
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
for species in df.columns[1:]:
    plt.plot(df['Time'], df[species], label=species)
plt.xlabel('Time')
plt.ylabel('Concentration')
plt.title('Species Concentrations Over Time')
plt.legend()
plt.show()

# Calculate correlation matrix to see relationships
corr = df.iloc[:, 1:].corr()
print("Correlation matrix of species concentrations:")
print(corr)

# Save the dataframe for further analysis
shared_variables.add('df_iteration_0', df)
shared_variables.add('corr_iteration_0', corr)
```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 Unauthorized modules matplotlib detected. Only these modules are allowed: numpy, pandas, libsbml, math, scipy, jax, sklearn, io, traceback.

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 19/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 2
## Thoughts
Plotting is not allowed due to module restrictions. Instead, I will analyze the data numerically by calculating the correlation matrix and examining the time derivatives (approximate rates of change) of each species to infer possible reaction directions. This will help identify which species are likely reactants and products in the missing reactions.

## Action

### Code
```python
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

# Access the experiment data
df = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Calculate correlation matrix of species concentrations
corr = df.iloc[:, 1:].corr()

# Calculate approximate time derivatives (rates of change) using finite differences
dt = np.diff(df['Time'])
dC = np.diff(df.iloc[:, 1:], axis=0)
rates = dC / dt[:, None]

# Average rates over time for each species
avg_rates = np.mean(rates, axis=0)

# Print correlation matrix and average rates
print("Correlation matrix of species concentrations:")
print(corr)

print("\nAverage rates of change for each species:")
for species, rate in zip(df.columns[1:], avg_rates):
    print(f"{species}: {rate}")

# Save for future reference
shared_variables.add('df_iteration_0', df)
shared_variables.add('corr_iteration_0', corr)
shared_variables.add('avg_rates_iteration_0', avg_rates)
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Correlation matrix of species concentrations:
          id_obek   id_e6fd   id_36d9   id_8mtc      Time
id_obek  1.000000 -0.883174  0.908623 -0.830999  0.754807
id_e6fd -0.883174  1.000000 -0.914784  0.584315 -0.552886
id_36d9  0.908623 -0.914784  1.000000 -0.522756  0.580485
id_8mtc -0.830999  0.584315 -0.522756  1.000000 -0.767572
Time     0.754807 -0.552886  0.580485 -0.767572  1.000000

Average rates of change for each species:
id_obek: 0.028567886082240958
id_e6fd: 2.326829589783326e-06
id_36d9: 0.17142416887833456
id_8mtc: 5.617461629605582e-06
Time: 1.0

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 18/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 3
## Thoughts
The correlation matrix shows strong positive correlations between id_obek and id_36d9, and strong negative correlations between id_e6fd and id_36d9, and between id_obek and id_e6fd. This suggests that id_obek and id_36d9 may be in a sequential or related pathway, while id_e6fd may be inversely related to them.

The average rates of change indicate that id_36d9 has the highest positive rate, followed by id_obek, while id_e6fd and id_8mtc have near-zero average rates, suggesting they may be intermediates or involved in slower reactions.

Given the initial observation that id_3fdc decreases rapidly and the others increase, a plausible hypothesis is a reaction chain:
id_3fdc → id_obek → id_e6fd → id_36d9
with a side reaction involving id_8mtc.

To test this hypothesis, I will perturb the initial concentration of id_3fdc (the initial substrate) and observe how the system responds. If the hypothesis is correct, increasing id_3fdc should increase the downstream species proportionally.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
  "action": "change_initial_concentration",
  "meta_data": {
    "id_3fdc": 2.0
  }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_3
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_3]

Total size: 288 rows × 6 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_3] for the full data

Time    id_3fdc  id_obek  id_e6fd  id_36d9  id_8mtc
0   2.00e+00        0        0        0        0
...
8.71e-02   1.97e-01 4.37e-03 1.37e+00 3.28e-01 1.01e-01
...
1.74e-01   1.94e-02 2.04e-02 1.05e+00 7.13e-01 1.97e-01
...
2.61e-01   1.91e-03 4.37e-02 7.24e-01 9.89e-01 2.42e-01
...
3.48e-01   1.89e-04 6.98e-02 4.99e-01 1.18e+00 2.53e-01
...
4.36e-01   1.86e-05 9.60e-02 3.50e-01 1.31e+00 2.45e-01
...
5.23e-01   1.83e-06 1.21e-01 2.50e-01 1.40e+00 2.26e-01
...
6.10e-01   1.81e-07 1.43e-01 1.83e-01 1.47e+00 2.04e-01
...
6.97e-01   1.78e-08 1.63e-01 1.37e-01 1.52e+00 1.80e-01
...
7.84e-01   1.76e-09 1.81e-01 1.04e-01 1.56e+00 1.57e-01
...
8.71e-01   1.75e-10 1.96e-01 8.12e-02 1.59e+00 1.36e-01
...
9.58e-01   2.05e-11 2.09e-01 6.43e-02 1.61e+00 1.17e-01
...
1.05e+00   2.55e-12 2.21e-01 5.16e-02 1.63e+00 1.01e-01
...
1.13e+00   2.87e-13 2.31e-01 4.19e-02 1.64e+00 8.61e-02
...
1.22e+00  -2.99e-13 2.39e-01 3.43e-02 1.65e+00 7.34e-02
...
1.31e+00  -1.73e-13 2.46e-01 2.84e-02 1.66e+00 6.25e-02
...
1.39e+00  -3.97e-14 2.52e-01 2.36e-02 1.67e+00 5.31e-02
...
1.48e+00   1.26e-14 2.57e-01 1.97e-02 1.68e+00 4.51e-02
...
1.57e+00  -8.98e-15 2.61e-01 1.65e-02 1.68e+00 3.83e-02
...
1.66e+00   4.26e-15 2.65e-01 1.39e-02 1.69e+00 3.25e-02
...
1.74e+00  -1.66e-15 2.68e-01 1.17e-02 1.69e+00 2.76e-02
...
1.83e+00   3.58e-16 2.71e-01 9.84e-03 1.70e+00 2.34e-02
...
1.92e+00   1.42e-17 2.73e-01 8.31e-03 1.70e+00 1.98e-02
...
2.00e+00  -1.97e-16 2.75e-01 7.02e-03 1.70e+00 1.68e-02
...
2.09e+00  -3.53e-16 2.77e-01 5.94e-03 1.70e+00 1.42e-02
...
2.18e+00  -2.46e-16 2.78e-01 5.02e-03 1.70e+00 1.21e-02
...
2.26e+00  -8.14e-17 2.79e-01 4.25e-03 1.71e+00 1.02e-02
...
2.35e+00   2.55e-17 2.80e-01 3.60e-03 1.71e+00 8.67e-03
...
2.44e+00  -2.13e-17 2.81e-01 3.05e-03 1.71e+00 7.34e-03
...
2.53e+00   9.85e-18 2.82e-01 2.58e-03 1.71e+00 6.22e-03
...
2.61e+00  -2.26e-18 2.82e-01 2.19e-03 1.71e+00 5.27e-03
...
2.70e+00  -2.91e-18 2.83e-01 1.85e-03 1.71e+00 4.47e-03
...
2.79e+00   3.90e-18 2.83e-01 1.57e-03 1.71e+00 3.78e-03
...
2.87e+00  -2.81e-18 2.84e-01 1.33e-03 1.71e+00 3.21e-03
...
2.96e+00   1.37e-18 2.84e-01 1.13e-03 1.71e+00 2.72e-03
...
3.05e+00  -4.93e-20 2.84e-01 9.54e-04 1.71e+00 2.30e-03
...
3.14e+00  -5.27e-19 2.84e-01 8.08e-04 1.71e+00 1.95e-03
...
3.22e+00   5.45e-19 2.85e-01 6.85e-04 1.71e+00 1.65e-03
...
3.31e+00  -3.40e-19 2.85e-01 5.80e-04 1.71e+00 1.40e-03
...
3.40e+00   1.07e-19 2.85e-01 4.91e-04 1.71e+00 1.19e-03
...
3.48e+00   3.47e-20 2.85e-01 4.16e-04 1.71e+00 1.00e-03
...
3.57e+00  -6.71e-20 2.85e-01 3.53e-04 1.71e+00 8.51e-04
...
3.66e+00   6.23e-20 2.85e-01 2.99e-04 1.71e+00 7.21e-04
...
3.75e+00  -3.37e-20 2.85e-01 2.53e-04 1.71e+00 6.11e-04
...
3.83e+00   1.18e-20 2.85e-01 2.14e-04 1.71e+00 5.18e-04
...
3.92e+00   2.98e-21 2.85e-01 1.82e-04 1.71e+00 4.39e-04
...
4.01e+00  -9.04e-21 2.85e-01 1.54e-04 1.71e+00 3.72e-04
...
4.09e+00   7.59e-21 2.86e-01 1.30e-04 1.71e+00 3.15e-04
...
4.18e+00  -4.66e-21 2.86e-01 1.11e-04 1.71e+00 2.67e-04
...
5.00e+00   7.78e-23 2.86e-01 2.33e-05 1.71e+00 5.62e-05

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 17/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 4
## Thoughts
The perturbation increasing the initial concentration of id_3fdc to 2.0 resulted in proportional increases in the concentrations of downstream species id_obek, id_e6fd, id_36d9, and id_8mtc. This supports the hypothesis that id_3fdc is a precursor converted into these species through a reaction network.

The data suggests a sequential conversion from id_3fdc to id_obek, then to id_e6fd, and then to id_36d9, with id_8mtc possibly formed as a side product from one of these species.

Next, to further clarify the reaction network, I will perturb the initial concentration of id_obek to see how it affects downstream species. If id_obek is an intermediate, increasing its initial concentration should increase id_e6fd and id_36d9 concentrations.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
  "action": "change_initial_concentration",
  "meta_data": {
    "id_obek": 0.5
  }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_4
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_4]

Total size: 288 rows × 6 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_4] for the full data

Time    id_3fdc  id_obek  id_e6fd  id_36d9  id_8mtc
0   1.00e+00 5.00e-01        0        0        0
...
8.71e-02   9.86e-02 5.02e-01 6.85e-01 1.64e-01 5.03e-02
...
1.74e-01   9.71e-03 5.10e-01 5.25e-01 3.57e-01 9.85e-02
...
2.61e-01   9.58e-04 5.22e-01 3.62e-01 4.94e-01 1.21e-01
...
3.48e-01   9.44e-05 5.35e-01 2.49e-01 5.89e-01 1.27e-01
...
4.36e-01   9.30e-06 5.48e-01 1.75e-01 6.55e-01 1.22e-01
...
5.23e-01   9.17e-07 5.60e-01 1.25e-01 7.01e-01 1.13e-01
...
6.10e-01   9.04e-08 5.72e-01 9.16e-02 7.35e-01 1.02e-01
...
6.97e-01   8.91e-09 5.82e-01 6.85e-02 7.60e-01 9.01e-02
...
7.84e-01   8.79e-10 5.90e-01 5.22e-02 7.79e-01 7.87e-02
...
8.71e-01   8.77e-11 5.98e-01 4.06e-02 7.93e-01 6.82e-02
...
9.58e-01   1.06e-11 6.05e-01 3.21e-02 8.04e-01 5.87e-02
...
1.05e+00   2.40e-12 6.10e-01 2.58e-02 8.13e-01 5.04e-02
...
1.13e+00   4.86e-13 6.15e-01 2.09e-02 8.21e-01 4.30e-02
...
1.22e+00  -9.30e-14 6.19e-01 1.72e-02 8.27e-01 3.67e-02
...
1.31e+00   4.42e-14 6.23e-01 1.42e-02 8.32e-01 3.12e-02
...
1.39e+00   2.62e-15 6.26e-01 1.18e-02 8.36e-01 2.66e-02
...
1.48e+00  -1.02e-14 6.29e-01 9.84e-03 8.39e-01 2.26e-02
...
1.57e+00   5.93e-15 6.31e-01 8.25e-03 8.42e-01 1.92e-02
...
1.66e+00  -1.12e-15 6.33e-01 6.93e-03 8.44e-01 1.63e-02
...
1.74e+00  -6.73e-16 6.34e-01 5.83e-03 8.46e-01 1.38e-02
...
1.83e+00   2.58e-15 6.35e-01 4.92e-03 8.48e-01 1.17e-02
...
1.92e+00   2.32e-15 6.37e-01 4.15e-03 8.49e-01 9.91e-03
...
2.00e+00  -3.61e-16 6.38e-01 3.51e-03 8.51e-01 8.40e-03
...
2.09e+00   5.51e-16 6.38e-01 2.97e-03 8.52e-01 7.12e-03
...
2.18e+00  -3.45e-16 6.39e-01 2.51e-03 8.52e-01 6.03e-03
...
2.26e+00   1.90e-16 6.40e-01 2.13e-03 8.53e-01 5.11e-03
...
2.35e+00  -8.68e-17 6.40e-01 1.80e-03 8.54e-01 4.33e-03
...
2.44e+00   2.69e-17 6.41e-01 1.52e-03 8.54e-01 3.67e-03
...
2.53e+00   3.08e-18 6.41e-01 1.29e-03 8.55e-01 3.11e-03
...
2.61e+00  -1.36e-17 6.41e-01 1.09e-03 8.55e-01 2.64e-03
...
2.70e+00   1.41e-17 6.41e-01 9.26e-04 8.55e-01 2.23e-03
...
2.79e+00  -1.07e-17 6.42e-01 7.84e-04 8.56e-01 1.89e-03
...
2.87e+00   6.73e-18 6.42e-01 6.64e-04 8.56e-01 1.60e-03
...
2.96e+00  -3.49e-18 6.42e-01 5.63e-04 8.56e-01 1.36e-03
...
3.05e+00   1.36e-18 6.42e-01 4.77e-04 8.56e-01 1.15e-03
...
3.14e+00  -1.97e-19 6.42e-01 4.04e-04 8.56e-01 9.75e-04
...
3.22e+00  -2.52e-19 6.42e-01 3.42e-04 8.56e-01 8.26e-04
...
3.31e+00   3.69e-19 6.42e-01 2.90e-04 8.57e-01 7.00e-04
...
3.40e+00  -3.45e-19 6.42e-01 2.46e-04 8.57e-01 5.93e-04
...
3.48e+00   2.59e-19 6.43e-01 2.08e-04 8.57e-01 5.02e-04
...
3.57e+00  -1.66e-19 6.43e-01 1.76e-04 8.57e-01 4.26e-04
...
3.66e+00   8.99e-20 6.43e-01 1.49e-04 8.57e-01 3.61e-04
...
3.75e+00  -3.90e-20 6.43e-01 1.27e-04 8.57e-01 3.06e-04
...
3.83e+00   9.93e-21 6.43e-01 1.07e-04 8.57e-01 2.59e-04
...
3.92e+00   3.57e-21 6.43e-01 9.09e-05 8.57e-01 2.19e-04
...
4.01e+00  -7.80e-21 6.43e-01 7.70e-05 8.57e-01 1.86e-04
...
4.09e+00   7.44e-21 6.43e-01 6.52e-05 8.57e-01 1.57e-04
...
4.18e+00  -5.43e-21 6.43e-01 5.53e-05 8.57e-01 1.33e-04
...
5.00e+00  -4.04e-23 6.43e-01 1.16e-05 8.57e-01 2.81e-05

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 16/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_4)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 5
## Thoughts
Increasing the initial concentration of id_obek to 0.5 while keeping id_3fdc at 1.0 resulted in a higher steady-state concentration of id_obek and increased concentrations of downstream species id_e6fd and id_36d9 compared to the baseline. This supports the hypothesis that id_obek is an intermediate converted into id_e6fd and then id_36d9.

The concentration of id_3fdc still decreases over time, indicating it is converted into id_obek. The data suggests a reaction chain:

id_3fdc → id_obek → id_e6fd → id_36d9

id_8mtc also increases but at a lower level, possibly as a side product from one of these species.

Next, I will perturb the initial concentration of id_e6fd to test if it affects id_36d9 and id_8mtc, which will help confirm the downstream reactions.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
  "action": "change_initial_concentration",
  "meta_data": {
    "id_e6fd": 0.5
  }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_5
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_5]

Total size: 288 rows × 6 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_5] for the full data

Time    id_3fdc  id_obek  id_e6fd  id_36d9  id_8mtc
0   1.00e+00        0 5.00e-01        0        0
...
8.71e-02   9.86e-02 4.41e-03 1.02e+00 2.92e-01 8.86e-02
...
1.74e-01   9.71e-03 1.75e-02 7.47e-01 5.71e-01 1.55e-01
...
2.61e-01   9.57e-04 3.55e-02 5.13e-01 7.66e-01 1.84e-01
...
3.48e-01   9.44e-05 5.52e-02 3.55e-01 9.00e-01 1.90e-01
...
4.36e-01   9.30e-06 7.47e-02 2.49e-01 9.94e-01 1.82e-01
...
5.23e-01   9.17e-07 9.30e-02 1.79e-01 1.06e+00 1.67e-01
...
6.10e-01   9.04e-08 1.10e-01 1.31e-01 1.11e+00 1.50e-01
...
6.97e-01   8.91e-09 1.24e-01 9.85e-02 1.14e+00 1.33e-01
...
7.84e-01   8.79e-10 1.37e-01 7.54e-02 1.17e+00 1.16e-01
...
8.71e-01   8.76e-11 1.49e-01 5.88e-02 1.19e+00 1.00e-01
...
9.58e-01   1.11e-11 1.58e-01 4.66e-02 1.21e+00 8.62e-02
...
1.05e+00   1.56e-12 1.67e-01 3.75e-02 1.22e+00 7.38e-02
...
1.13e+00   4.03e-13 1.74e-01 3.05e-02 1.23e+00 6.31e-02
...
1.22e+00   1.93e-14 1.80e-01 2.50e-02 1.24e+00 5.38e-02
...
1.31e+00  -3.04e-14 1.85e-01 2.07e-02 1.25e+00 4.58e-02
...
1.39e+00   1.38e-14 1.90e-01 1.72e-02 1.25e+00 3.89e-02
...
1.48e+00   1.33e-15 1.93e-01 1.44e-02 1.26e+00 3.31e-02
...
1.57e+00  -3.07e-15 1.97e-01 1.21e-02 1.26e+00 2.81e-02
...
1.66e+00   3.62e-15 1.99e-01 1.01e-02 1.27e+00 2.38e-02
...
1.74e+00   3.38e-15 2.02e-01 8.54e-03 1.27e+00 2.02e-02
...
1.83e+00   7.54e-16 2.03e-01 7.20e-03 1.27e+00 1.71e-02
...
1.92e+00   6.73e-17 2.05e-01 6.08e-03 1.27e+00 1.45e-02
...
2.00e+00   2.07e-17 2.07e-01 5.14e-03 1.28e+00 1.23e-02
...
2.09e+00  -2.94e-17 2.08e-01 4.35e-03 1.28e+00 1.04e-02
...
2.18e+00   2.28e-17 2.09e-01 3.68e-03 1.28e+00 8.84e-03
...
2.26e+00  -1.49e-17 2.10e-01 3.11e-03 1.28e+00 7.49e-03
...
2.35e+00   9.75e-18 2.10e-01 2.63e-03 1.28e+00 6.34e-03
...
2.44e+00  -5.93e-18 2.11e-01 2.23e-03 1.28e+00 5.38e-03
...
2.53e+00   3.47e-18 2.11e-01 1.89e-03 1.28e+00 4.56e-03
...
2.61e+00  -1.94e-18 2.12e-01 1.60e-03 1.28e+00 3.86e-03
...
2.70e+00   1.04e-18 2.12e-01 1.36e-03 1.28e+00 3.27e-03
...
2.79e+00  -5.19e-19 2.13e-01 1.15e-03 1.28e+00 2.77e-03
...
2.87e+00   2.35e-19 2.13e-01 9.73e-04 1.28e+00 2.35e-03
...
2.96e+00  -8.82e-20 2.13e-01 8.24e-04 1.28e+00 1.99e-03
...
3.05e+00   1.73e-20 2.13e-01 6.98e-04 1.28e+00 1.69e-03
...
3.14e+00   1.27e-20 2.13e-01 5.92e-04 1.28e+00 1.43e-03
...
3.22e+00  -2.18e-20 2.14e-01 5.01e-04 1.28e+00 1.21e-03
...
3.31e+00   2.14e-20 2.14e-01 4.25e-04 1.28e+00 1.02e-03
...
3.40e+00  -1.73e-20 2.14e-01 3.60e-04 1.29e+00 8.68e-04
...
3.48e+00   1.25e-20 2.14e-01 3.05e-04 1.29e+00 7.36e-04
...
3.57e+00  -8.28e-21 2.14e-01 2.58e-04 1.29e+00 6.23e-04
...
3.66e+00   5.05e-21 2.14e-01 2.19e-04 1.29e+00 5.28e-04
...
3.75e+00  -2.81e-21 2.14e-01 1.85e-04 1.29e+00 4.47e-04
...
3.83e+00   1.40e-21 2.14e-01 1.57e-04 1.29e+00 3.79e-04
...
3.92e+00  -6.81e-22 2.14e-01 1.33e-04 1.29e+00 3.21e-04
...
4.01e+00   2.99e-22 2.14e-01 1.13e-04 1.29e+00 2.72e-04
...
4.09e+00  -1.08e-22 2.14e-01 9.55e-05 1.29e+00 2.31e-04
...
4.18e+00   2.00e-23 2.14e-01 8.09e-05 1.29e+00 1.95e-04
...
5.00e+00   1.20e-24 2.14e-01 1.70e-05 1.29e+00 4.11e-05

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 15/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_4, iteration_5)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 6
## Thoughts
Increasing the initial concentration of id_e6fd to 0.5 while keeping id_3fdc and id_obek at their default initial concentrations resulted in increased concentrations of id_36d9 and id_8mtc. This supports the hypothesis that id_e6fd is converted into id_36d9 and possibly id_8mtc.

The data suggests the following reaction network:
- id_3fdc → id_obek
- id_obek → id_e6fd
- id_e6fd → id_36d9
- id_e6fd → id_8mtc (side reaction)

Next, I will test if id_8mtc is produced directly from id_e6fd or from id_36d9 by perturbing the initial concentration of id_8mtc and observing the effect on other species.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
  "action": "change_initial_concentration",
  "meta_data": {
    "id_8mtc": 0.1
  }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_6
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_6]

Total size: 288 rows × 6 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_6] for the full data

Time    id_3fdc  id_obek  id_e6fd  id_36d9  id_8mtc
0   1.00e+00        0        0        0 1.00e-01
...
8.71e-02   9.86e-02 1.16e-02 6.93e-01 1.65e-01 1.32e-01
...
1.74e-01   9.71e-03 2.74e-02 5.36e-01 3.61e-01 1.66e-01
...
2.61e-01   9.57e-04 4.54e-02 3.74e-01 5.03e-01 1.77e-01
...
3.48e-01   9.44e-05 6.38e-02 2.62e-01 6.01e-01 1.73e-01
...
4.36e-01   9.30e-06 8.13e-02 1.87e-01 6.71e-01 1.61e-01
...
5.23e-01   9.17e-07 9.73e-02 1.36e-01 7.21e-01 1.46e-01
...
6.10e-01   9.04e-08 1.12e-01 1.01e-01 7.58e-01 1.29e-01
...
6.97e-01   8.91e-09 1.24e-01 7.70e-02 7.86e-01 1.13e-01
...
7.84e-01   8.79e-10 1.35e-01 5.96e-02 8.07e-01 9.82e-02
...
8.71e-01   8.88e-11 1.45e-01 4.70e-02 8.23e-01 8.46e-02
...
9.58e-01   9.40e-12 1.53e-01 3.76e-02 8.37e-01 7.26e-02
...
1.05e+00   9.46e-13 1.60e-01 3.05e-02 8.47e-01 6.21e-02
...
1.13e+00   3.21e-13 1.66e-01 2.49e-02 8.56e-01 5.30e-02
...
1.22e+00   1.22e-13 1.71e-01 2.06e-02 8.63e-01 4.51e-02
...
1.31e+00   2.55e-14 1.76e-01 1.71e-02 8.69e-01 3.84e-02
...
1.39e+00  -6.30e-15 1.79e-01 1.43e-02 8.74e-01 3.26e-02
...
1.48e+00   3.56e-15 1.82e-01 1.19e-02 8.78e-01 2.77e-02
...
1.57e+00  -1.19e-15 1.85e-01 1.00e-02 8.81e-01 2.35e-02
...
1.66e+00  -7.35e-17 1.87e-01 8.44e-03 8.84e-01 1.99e-02
...
1.74e+00   2.82e-16 1.89e-01 7.12e-03 8.87e-01 1.69e-02
...
1.83e+00  -1.99e-16 1.91e-01 6.01e-03 8.89e-01 1.43e-02
...
1.92e+00   7.34e-16 1.92e-01 5.08e-03 8.90e-01 1.21e-02
...
2.00e+00   4.86e-16 1.94e-01 4.29e-03 8.92e-01 1.03e-02
...
2.09e+00  -7.06e-17 1.94e-01 3.63e-03 8.93e-01 8.72e-03
...
2.18e+00   1.23e-16 1.95e-01 3.07e-03 8.94e-01 7.39e-03
...
2.26e+00  -6.33e-17 1.96e-01 2.60e-03 8.95e-01 6.26e-03
...
2.35e+00   1.80e-17 1.97e-01 2.20e-03 8.96e-01 5.30e-03
...
2.44e+00   5.82e-18 1.97e-01 1.86e-03 8.96e-01 4.49e-03
...
2.53e+00  -1.22e-17 1.98e-01 1.58e-03 8.97e-01 3.81e-03
...
2.61e+00   1.15e-17 1.98e-01 1.34e-03 8.97e-01 3.23e-03
...
2.70e+00  -7.63e-18 1.98e-01 1.13e-03 8.98e-01 2.73e-03
...
2.79e+00   3.42e-18 1.99e-01 9.60e-04 8.98e-01 2.32e-03
...
2.87e+00  -5.00e-19 1.99e-01 8.13e-04 8.98e-01 1.96e-03
...
2.96e+00  -6.33e-19 1.99e-01 6.89e-04 8.99e-01 1.66e-03
...
3.05e+00   9.57e-19 1.99e-01 5.84e-04 8.99e-01 1.41e-03
...
3.14e+00  -8.18e-19 1.99e-01 4.95e-04 8.99e-01 1.19e-03
...
3.22e+00   4.79e-19 1.99e-01 4.19e-04 8.99e-01 1.01e-03
...
3.31e+00  -1.71e-19 1.99e-01 3.55e-04 8.99e-01 8.57e-04
...
3.40e+00   1.79e-20 2.00e-01 3.01e-04 8.99e-01 7.26e-04
...
3.48e+00   5.75e-20 2.00e-01 2.55e-04 9.00e-01 6.15e-04
...
3.57e+00  -7.56e-20 2.00e-01 2.16e-04 9.00e-01 5.21e-04
...
3.66e+00   5.70e-20 2.00e-01 1.83e-04 9.00e-01 4.42e-04
...
3.75e+00  -2.90e-20 2.00e-01 1.55e-04 9.00e-01 3.74e-04
...
3.83e+00   1.13e-20 2.00e-01 1.31e-04 9.00e-01 3.17e-04
...
3.92e+00   2.69e-22 2.00e-01 1.11e-04 9.00e-01 2.69e-04
...
4.01e+00  -5.64e-21 2.00e-01 9.42e-05 9.00e-01 2.28e-04
...
4.09e+00   5.89e-21 2.00e-01 7.98e-05 9.00e-01 1.93e-04
...
4.18e+00  -3.88e-21 2.00e-01 6.76e-05 9.00e-01 1.63e-04
...
5.00e+00  -2.77e-23 2.00e-01 1.42e-05 9.00e-01 3.44e-05

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 14/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_4, iteration_5, iteration_6)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 7
## Thoughts
Increasing the initial concentration of id_8mtc to 0.1 did not significantly affect the concentrations of other species, especially id_36d9, which continued to increase independently. This suggests that id_8mtc is likely a terminal product or side product and not a precursor to other species.

The data supports the reaction network:
- id_3fdc → id_obek
- id_obek → id_e6fd
- id_e6fd → id_36d9
- id_e6fd → id_8mtc (side reaction)

Next, I will test if id_36d9 converts back to any other species by increasing its initial concentration and observing the system response.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
  "action": "change_initial_concentration",
  "meta_data": {
    "id_36d9": 0.5
  }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_7
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_7]

Total size: 288 rows × 6 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_7] for the full data

Time    id_3fdc  id_obek  id_e6fd  id_36d9  id_8mtc
0   1.00e+00        0        0 5.00e-01        0
...
8.71e-02   9.86e-02 2.18e-03 6.85e-01 6.64e-01 5.03e-02
...
1.74e-01   9.71e-03 1.02e-02 5.25e-01 8.57e-01 9.85e-02
...
2.61e-01   9.57e-04 2.19e-02 3.62e-01 9.94e-01 1.21e-01
...
3.48e-01   9.44e-05 3.49e-02 2.49e-01 1.09e+00 1.27e-01
...
4.36e-01   9.30e-06 4.80e-02 1.75e-01 1.15e+00 1.22e-01
...
5.23e-01   9.17e-07 6.03e-02 1.25e-01 1.20e+00 1.13e-01
...
6.10e-01   9.04e-08 7.16e-02 9.16e-02 1.23e+00 1.02e-01
...
6.97e-01   8.91e-09 8.16e-02 6.85e-02 1.26e+00 9.01e-02
...
7.84e-01   8.79e-10 9.04e-02 5.22e-02 1.28e+00 7.87e-02
...
8.71e-01   8.69e-11 9.81e-02 4.06e-02 1.29e+00 6.82e-02
...
9.58e-01   9.03e-12 1.05e-01 3.21e-02 1.30e+00 5.87e-02
...
1.05e+00   1.95e-12 1.10e-01 2.58e-02 1.31e+00 5.04e-02
...
1.13e+00   2.36e-13 1.15e-01 2.09e-02 1.32e+00 4.30e-02
...
1.22e+00   1.43e-13 1.19e-01 1.72e-02 1.33e+00 3.67e-02
...
1.31e+00  -2.99e-14 1.23e-01 1.42e-02 1.33e+00 3.12e-02
...
1.39e+00   8.55e-15 1.26e-01 1.18e-02 1.34e+00 2.66e-02
...
1.48e+00   3.72e-15 1.29e-01 9.84e-03 1.34e+00 2.26e-02
...
1.57e+00  -4.71e-15 1.31e-01 8.25e-03 1.34e+00 1.92e-02
...
1.66e+00   2.59e-15 1.33e-01 6.93e-03 1.34e+00 1.63e-02
...
1.74e+00  -1.12e-15 1.34e-01 5.83e-03 1.35e+00 1.38e-02
...
1.83e+00   1.88e-16 1.35e-01 4.92e-03 1.35e+00 1.17e-02
...
1.92e+00   4.69e-16 1.37e-01 4.15e-03 1.35e+00 9.91e-03
...
2.00e+00   1.89e-15 1.38e-01 3.51e-03 1.35e+00 8.40e-03
...
2.09e+00   1.55e-16 1.38e-01 2.97e-03 1.35e+00 7.12e-03
...
2.18e+00   1.68e-16 1.39e-01 2.51e-03 1.35e+00 6.03e-03
...
2.26e+00   1.94e-17 1.40e-01 2.13e-03 1.35e+00 5.11e-03
...
2.35e+00  -6.96e-17 1.40e-01 1.80e-03 1.35e+00 4.33e-03
...
2.44e+00   6.41e-17 1.41e-01 1.52e-03 1.35e+00 3.67e-03
...
2.53e+00  -4.07e-17 1.41e-01 1.29e-03 1.35e+00 3.11e-03
...
2.61e+00   2.09e-17 1.41e-01 1.09e-03 1.36e+00 2.64e-03
...
2.70e+00  -6.96e-18 1.41e-01 9.26e-04 1.36e+00 2.23e-03
...
2.79e+00  -1.79e-18 1.42e-01 7.84e-04 1.36e+00 1.89e-03
...
2.87e+00   4.86e-18 1.42e-01 6.64e-04 1.36e+00 1.60e-03
...
2.96e+00  -4.44e-18 1.42e-01 5.63e-04 1.36e+00 1.36e-03
...
3.05e+00   2.77e-18 1.42e-01 4.77e-04 1.36e+00 1.15e-03
...
3.14e+00  -1.52e-18 1.42e-01 4.04e-04 1.36e+00 9.75e-04
...
3.22e+00   4.51e-19 1.42e-01 3.42e-04 1.36e+00 8.26e-04
...
3.31e+00   1.58e-19 1.42e-01 2.90e-04 1.36e+00 7.00e-04
...
3.40e+00  -3.51e-19 1.42e-01 2.46e-04 1.36e+00 5.93e-04
...
3.48e+00   3.09e-19 1.43e-01 2.08e-04 1.36e+00 5.02e-04
...
3.57e+00  -2.02e-19 1.43e-01 1.76e-04 1.36e+00 4.26e-04
...
3.66e+00   1.05e-19 1.43e-01 1.49e-04 1.36e+00 3.61e-04
...
3.75e+00  -2.73e-20 1.43e-01 1.27e-04 1.36e+00 3.06e-04
...
3.83e+00  -1.37e-20 1.43e-01 1.07e-04 1.36e+00 2.59e-04
...
3.92e+00   2.54e-20 1.43e-01 9.09e-05 1.36e+00 2.19e-04
...
4.01e+00  -2.15e-20 1.43e-01 7.70e-05 1.36e+00 1.86e-04
...
4.09e+00   1.44e-20 1.43e-01 6.52e-05 1.36e+00 1.57e-04
...
4.18e+00  -6.98e-21 1.43e-01 5.53e-05 1.36e+00 1.33e-04
...
5.00e+00  -3.16e-23 1.43e-01 1.16e-05 1.36e+00 2.81e-05

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 13/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_4, iteration_5, iteration_6, iteration_7)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 8
## Thoughts
Increasing the initial concentration of id_36d9 to 0.5 did not lead to a decrease in id_36d9 or an increase in other species, indicating that id_36d9 is likely a terminal product and does not convert back to other species.

The data supports the reaction network:
- id_3fdc → id_obek
- id_obek → id_e6fd
- id_e6fd → id_36d9
- id_e6fd → id_8mtc (side reaction)

Given this, I will now proceed to add these reactions to the SBML model using libsbml and submit the completed model.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Load the input SBML model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Helper function to add a reaction
def add_reaction(model, reaction_id, reactants, products):
    reaction = model.createReaction()
    reaction.setId(reaction_id)
    reaction.setReversible(False)
    reaction.setFast(False)
    for species_id, stoich in reactants.items():
        reactant = reaction.createReactant()
        reactant.setSpecies(species_id)
        reactant.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        reactant.setConstant(False)
    for species_id, stoich in products.items():
        product = reaction.createProduct()
        product.setSpecies(species_id)
        product.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        product.setConstant(True)

# Add reactions based on inferred network
add_reaction(model, "r1", {"id_3fdc": 1}, {"id_obek": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r2", {"id_obek": 1}, {"id_e6fd": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r3", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_36d9": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r4", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_8mtc": 1})

# Write the updated SBML to string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
final_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 12/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_4, iteration_5, iteration_6, iteration_7)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 9
## Thoughts
I have added the four reactions inferred from the experimental data to the SBML model. The reactions represent the sequential conversion of species and the side reaction producing id_8mtc from id_e6fd.

Next, I will simulate the updated model and compare its behavior with the original observation data to verify if the model reproduces the system dynamics accurately. This will help confirm if the added reactions are sufficient or if further refinement is needed.

## Action

### Code
```python
# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(final_sbml)

# Access the original observation data for comparison
original_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Calculate the difference between simulation and original data at final time point
final_time = original_data['Time'].max()
sim_final = sim_data[sim_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]
orig_final = original_data[original_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]

diff = (sim_final - orig_final).abs()

print("Difference between simulation and original data at final time point:")
print(diff)

# Save simulation data for further analysis if needed
shared_variables.add('sim_data', sim_data)
shared_variables.add('diff_final', diff)
```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 name 'final_sbml' is not defined

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 11/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_4, iteration_5, iteration_6, iteration_7)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 10
## Thoughts
I forgot to assign the updated SBML string to a global variable `final_sbml` in the previous code cell. I will fix this by explicitly assigning the updated SBML string to `final_sbml` and then simulate the model to compare with the original data.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Load the input SBML model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Helper function to add a reaction
def add_reaction(model, reaction_id, reactants, products):
    reaction = model.createReaction()
    reaction.setId(reaction_id)
    reaction.setReversible(False)
    reaction.setFast(False)
    for species_id, stoich in reactants.items():
        reactant = reaction.createReactant()
        reactant.setSpecies(species_id)
        reactant.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        reactant.setConstant(False)
    for species_id, stoich in products.items():
        product = reaction.createProduct()
        product.setSpecies(species_id)
        product.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        product.setConstant(True)

# Add reactions based on inferred network
add_reaction(model, "r1", {"id_3fdc": 1}, {"id_obek": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r2", {"id_obek": 1}, {"id_e6fd": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r3", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_36d9": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r4", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_8mtc": 1})

# Write the updated SBML to string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
final_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(final_sbml)

# Access the original observation data for comparison
original_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Calculate the difference between simulation and original data at final time point
final_time = original_data['Time'].max()
sim_final = sim_data[sim_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]
orig_final = original_data[original_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]

diff = (sim_final - orig_final).abs()

print("Difference between simulation and original data at final time point:")
print(diff)

# Save simulation data for further analysis if needed
shared_variables.add('sim_data', sim_data)
shared_variables.add('diff_final', diff)
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Difference between simulation and original data at final time point:
id_obek    0.142839
id_e6fd    0.000012
id_36d9    0.857121
id_8mtc    0.000028
Time       0.000000
Name: 287, dtype: float64

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 10/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_4, iteration_5, iteration_6, iteration_7)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0, sim_data, diff_final)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 11
## Thoughts
The simulation results show a large difference for id_obek and id_36d9 compared to the original data at the final time point, indicating the current model does not fully capture the system dynamics. The differences for id_e6fd and id_8mtc are small, suggesting those parts of the model are more accurate.

The large difference for id_36d9 suggests that the conversion from id_e6fd to id_36d9 might be too fast or missing some regulation. The difference for id_obek suggests the initial conversion from id_3fdc to id_obek might also be inaccurate.

To refine the model, I will test if there is a direct conversion from id_3fdc to id_e6fd bypassing id_obek by perturbing the initial concentration of id_e6fd and id_obek simultaneously and observing the system response.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
  "action": "change_initial_concentration",
  "meta_data": {
    "id_obek": 0.5,
    "id_e6fd": 0.5
  }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_11
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_11]

Total size: 288 rows × 6 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_11] for the full data

Time    id_3fdc  id_obek  id_e6fd  id_36d9  id_8mtc
0   1.00e+00 5.00e-01 5.00e-01        0        0
...
8.71e-02   9.86e-02 5.04e-01 1.02e+00 2.92e-01 8.86e-02
...
1.74e-01   9.71e-03 5.18e-01 7.47e-01 5.71e-01 1.55e-01
...
2.61e-01   9.57e-04 5.36e-01 5.13e-01 7.66e-01 1.84e-01
...
3.48e-01   9.44e-05 5.55e-01 3.55e-01 9.00e-01 1.90e-01
...
4.36e-01   9.30e-06 5.75e-01 2.49e-01 9.94e-01 1.82e-01
...
5.23e-01   9.17e-07 5.93e-01 1.79e-01 1.06e+00 1.67e-01
...
6.10e-01   9.04e-08 6.10e-01 1.31e-01 1.11e+00 1.50e-01
...
6.97e-01   8.91e-09 6.24e-01 9.85e-02 1.14e+00 1.33e-01
...
7.84e-01   8.79e-10 6.37e-01 7.54e-02 1.17e+00 1.16e-01
...
8.71e-01   8.78e-11 6.49e-01 5.88e-02 1.19e+00 1.00e-01
...
9.58e-01   1.04e-11 6.58e-01 4.66e-02 1.21e+00 8.62e-02
...
1.05e+00   1.30e-12 6.67e-01 3.75e-02 1.22e+00 7.38e-02
...
1.13e+00   1.31e-13 6.74e-01 3.05e-02 1.23e+00 6.31e-02
...
1.22e+00  -9.07e-15 6.80e-01 2.50e-02 1.24e+00 5.38e-02
...
1.31e+00   2.00e-13 6.85e-01 2.07e-02 1.25e+00 4.58e-02
...
1.39e+00   1.84e-14 6.90e-01 1.72e-02 1.25e+00 3.89e-02
...
1.48e+00   2.05e-14 6.93e-01 1.44e-02 1.26e+00 3.31e-02
...
1.57e+00  -8.69e-15 6.97e-01 1.21e-02 1.26e+00 2.81e-02
...
1.66e+00   4.56e-15 6.99e-01 1.01e-02 1.27e+00 2.38e-02
...
1.74e+00  -1.84e-15 7.02e-01 8.54e-03 1.27e+00 2.02e-02
...
1.83e+00   8.68e-16 7.03e-01 7.20e-03 1.27e+00 1.71e-02
...
1.92e+00  -1.96e-16 7.05e-01 6.08e-03 1.27e+00 1.45e-02
...
2.00e+00   1.44e-17 7.07e-01 5.14e-03 1.28e+00 1.23e-02
...
2.09e+00   5.31e-17 7.08e-01 4.35e-03 1.28e+00 1.04e-02
...
2.18e+00   2.28e-16 7.09e-01 3.68e-03 1.28e+00 8.84e-03
...
2.26e+00   1.65e-16 7.10e-01 3.11e-03 1.28e+00 7.49e-03
...
2.35e+00   7.24e-17 7.10e-01 2.63e-03 1.28e+00 6.34e-03
...
2.44e+00  -1.41e-17 7.11e-01 2.23e-03 1.28e+00 5.38e-03
...
2.53e+00   1.02e-17 7.11e-01 1.89e-03 1.28e+00 4.56e-03
...
2.61e+00  -8.73e-19 7.12e-01 1.60e-03 1.28e+00 3.86e-03
...
2.70e+00  -4.72e-18 7.12e-01 1.36e-03 1.28e+00 3.27e-03
...
2.79e+00   4.65e-18 7.13e-01 1.15e-03 1.28e+00 2.77e-03
...
2.87e+00  -2.19e-18 7.13e-01 9.73e-04 1.28e+00 2.35e-03
...
2.96e+00   1.69e-21 7.13e-01 8.24e-04 1.28e+00 1.99e-03
...
3.05e+00   7.01e-19 7.13e-01 6.98e-04 1.28e+00 1.69e-03
...
3.14e+00  -8.12e-19 7.13e-01 5.92e-04 1.28e+00 1.43e-03
...
3.22e+00   4.65e-19 7.14e-01 5.01e-04 1.28e+00 1.21e-03
...
3.31e+00  -1.40e-19 7.14e-01 4.25e-04 1.28e+00 1.02e-03
...
3.40e+00  -1.22e-19 7.14e-01 3.60e-04 1.29e+00 8.68e-04
...
3.48e+00   1.74e-19 7.14e-01 3.05e-04 1.29e+00 7.36e-04
...
3.57e+00  -1.11e-19 7.14e-01 2.58e-04 1.29e+00 6.23e-04
...
3.66e+00   2.43e-20 7.14e-01 2.19e-04 1.29e+00 5.28e-04
...
3.75e+00   1.78e-20 7.14e-01 1.85e-04 1.29e+00 4.47e-04
...
3.83e+00  -2.97e-20 7.14e-01 1.57e-04 1.29e+00 3.79e-04
...
3.92e+00   2.06e-20 7.14e-01 1.33e-04 1.29e+00 3.21e-04
...
4.01e+00  -9.42e-21 7.14e-01 1.13e-04 1.29e+00 2.72e-04
...
4.09e+00  -1.73e-21 7.14e-01 9.55e-05 1.29e+00 2.31e-04
...
4.18e+00   5.91e-21 7.14e-01 8.09e-05 1.29e+00 1.95e-04
...
5.00e+00  -6.37e-23 7.14e-01 1.70e-05 1.29e+00 4.11e-05

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 9/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_4, iteration_5, iteration_6, iteration_7, iteration_11)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0, sim_data, diff_final)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 12
## Thoughts
The experiment with increased initial concentrations of both id_obek and id_e6fd shows that both species maintain higher concentrations over time, and downstream species id_36d9 and id_8mtc increase accordingly. This suggests that the current linear pathway is valid but might be missing a direct conversion from id_3fdc to id_e6fd, bypassing id_obek, to better fit the data.

I will add a direct reaction from id_3fdc to id_e6fd to the model and then simulate to check if this improves the fit.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Load the input SBML model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Clear existing reactions to avoid duplicates
model.removeListOfReactions()

# Helper function to add a reaction
def add_reaction(model, reaction_id, reactants, products):
    reaction = model.createReaction()
    reaction.setId(reaction_id)
    reaction.setReversible(False)
    reaction.setFast(False)
    for species_id, stoich in reactants.items():
        reactant = reaction.createReactant()
        reactant.setSpecies(species_id)
        reactant.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        reactant.setConstant(False)
    for species_id, stoich in products.items():
        product = reaction.createProduct()
        product.setSpecies(species_id)
        product.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        product.setConstant(True)

# Add reactions including the new direct conversion
add_reaction(model, "r1", {"id_3fdc": 1}, {"id_obek": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r2", {"id_obek": 1}, {"id_e6fd": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r3", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_36d9": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r4", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_8mtc": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r5", {"id_3fdc": 1}, {"id_e6fd": 1})  # New direct reaction

# Write the updated SBML to string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
final_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(final_sbml)

# Access the original observation data for comparison
original_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Calculate the difference between simulation and original data at final time point
final_time = original_data['Time'].max()
sim_final = sim_data[sim_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]
orig_final = original_data[original_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]

diff = (sim_final - orig_final).abs()

print("Difference between simulation and original data at final time point after adding direct reaction:")
print(diff)

# Save simulation data for further analysis if needed
shared_variables.add('sim_data', sim_data)
shared_variables.add('diff_final', diff)
```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 'Model' object has no attribute 'removeListOfReactions'

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 8/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_4, iteration_5, iteration_6, iteration_7, iteration_11)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0, sim_data, diff_final)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 13
## Thoughts
The error indicates that the `Model` object in libsbml does not have a `removeListOfReactions` method. Instead, I need to remove reactions individually by iterating over the list of reactions and removing them one by one before adding the updated reactions.

I will fix this by removing all existing reactions manually before adding the new set of reactions including the direct conversion from id_3fdc to id_e6fd.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Load the input SBML model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
for i in range(num_reactions - 1, -1, -1):
    model.removeReaction(i)

# Helper function to add a reaction
def add_reaction(model, reaction_id, reactants, products):
    reaction = model.createReaction()
    reaction.setId(reaction_id)
    reaction.setReversible(False)
    reaction.setFast(False)
    for species_id, stoich in reactants.items():
        reactant = reaction.createReactant()
        reactant.setSpecies(species_id)
        reactant.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        reactant.setConstant(False)
    for species_id, stoich in products.items():
        product = reaction.createProduct()
        product.setSpecies(species_id)
        product.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        product.setConstant(True)

# Add reactions including the new direct conversion
add_reaction(model, "r1", {"id_3fdc": 1}, {"id_obek": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r2", {"id_obek": 1}, {"id_e6fd": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r3", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_36d9": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r4", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_8mtc": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r5", {"id_3fdc": 1}, {"id_e6fd": 1})  # New direct reaction

# Write the updated SBML to string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
final_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(final_sbml)

# Access the original observation data for comparison
original_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Calculate the difference between simulation and original data at final time point
final_time = original_data['Time'].max()
sim_final = sim_data[sim_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]
orig_final = original_data[original_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]

diff = (sim_final - orig_final).abs()

print("Difference between simulation and original data at final time point after adding direct reaction:")
print(diff)

# Save simulation data for further analysis if needed
shared_variables.add('sim_data', sim_data)
shared_variables.add('diff_final', diff)
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Difference between simulation and original data at final time point after adding direct reaction:
id_obek    0.142839
id_e6fd    0.000012
id_36d9    0.857121
id_8mtc    0.000028
Time       0.000000
Name: 287, dtype: float64

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 7/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_4, iteration_5, iteration_6, iteration_7, iteration_11)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0, sim_data, diff_final)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 14
## Thoughts
Adding the direct reaction from id_3fdc to id_e6fd did not improve the model fit, as the differences for id_obek and id_36d9 remain large. This suggests that the model is missing additional reactions or regulatory mechanisms.

The large difference for id_36d9 suggests it might be produced not only from id_e6fd but also from id_obek or id_3fdc directly. Similarly, id_obek might be consumed by other reactions.

I will test if id_36d9 can be produced directly from id_obek by perturbing the initial concentration of id_36d9 and id_obek simultaneously and observing the system response.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
  "action": "change_initial_concentration",
  "meta_data": {
    "id_obek": 0.5,
    "id_36d9": 0.5
  }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_14
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_14]

Total size: 288 rows × 6 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_14] for the full data

Time    id_3fdc  id_obek  id_e6fd  id_36d9  id_8mtc
0   1.00e+00 5.00e-01        0 5.00e-01        0
...
8.71e-02   9.86e-02 5.02e-01 6.85e-01 6.64e-01 5.03e-02
...
1.74e-01   9.71e-03 5.10e-01 5.25e-01 8.57e-01 9.85e-02
...
2.61e-01   9.57e-04 5.22e-01 3.62e-01 9.94e-01 1.21e-01
...
3.48e-01   9.44e-05 5.35e-01 2.49e-01 1.09e+00 1.27e-01
...
4.36e-01   9.30e-06 5.48e-01 1.75e-01 1.15e+00 1.22e-01
...
5.23e-01   9.17e-07 5.60e-01 1.25e-01 1.20e+00 1.13e-01
...
6.10e-01   9.04e-08 5.72e-01 9.16e-02 1.23e+00 1.02e-01
...
6.97e-01   8.91e-09 5.82e-01 6.85e-02 1.26e+00 9.01e-02
...
7.84e-01   8.79e-10 5.90e-01 5.22e-02 1.28e+00 7.87e-02
...
8.71e-01   8.70e-11 5.98e-01 4.06e-02 1.29e+00 6.82e-02
...
9.58e-01   8.94e-12 6.05e-01 3.21e-02 1.30e+00 5.87e-02
...
1.05e+00   2.34e-12 6.10e-01 2.58e-02 1.31e+00 5.04e-02
...
1.13e+00   2.12e-13 6.15e-01 2.09e-02 1.32e+00 4.30e-02
...
1.22e+00   1.52e-13 6.19e-01 1.72e-02 1.33e+00 3.67e-02
...
1.31e+00  -2.31e-14 6.23e-01 1.42e-02 1.33e+00 3.12e-02
...
1.39e+00  -4.06e-16 6.26e-01 1.18e-02 1.34e+00 2.66e-02
...
1.48e+00   6.60e-15 6.29e-01 9.84e-03 1.34e+00 2.26e-02
...
1.57e+00  -6.05e-15 6.31e-01 8.25e-03 1.34e+00 1.92e-02
...
1.66e+00   2.88e-15 6.33e-01 6.93e-03 1.34e+00 1.63e-02
...
1.74e+00  -8.67e-16 6.34e-01 5.83e-03 1.35e+00 1.38e-02
...
1.83e+00   8.61e-17 6.35e-01 4.92e-03 1.35e+00 1.17e-02
...
1.92e+00   2.27e-16 6.37e-01 4.15e-03 1.35e+00 9.91e-03
...
2.00e+00   1.07e-15 6.38e-01 3.51e-03 1.35e+00 8.40e-03
...
2.09e+00   5.01e-16 6.38e-01 2.97e-03 1.35e+00 7.12e-03
...
2.18e+00   3.94e-17 6.39e-01 2.51e-03 1.35e+00 6.03e-03
...
2.26e+00   3.96e-17 6.40e-01 2.13e-03 1.35e+00 5.11e-03
...
2.35e+00  -2.09e-17 6.40e-01 1.80e-03 1.35e+00 4.33e-03
...
2.44e+00   5.10e-18 6.41e-01 1.52e-03 1.35e+00 3.67e-03
...
2.53e+00   2.59e-18 6.41e-01 1.29e-03 1.35e+00 3.11e-03
...
2.61e+00  -4.68e-18 6.41e-01 1.09e-03 1.36e+00 2.64e-03
...
2.70e+00   4.00e-18 6.41e-01 9.26e-04 1.36e+00 2.23e-03
...
2.79e+00  -2.61e-18 6.42e-01 7.84e-04 1.36e+00 1.89e-03
...
2.87e+00   1.13e-18 6.42e-01 6.64e-04 1.36e+00 1.60e-03
...
2.96e+00  -9.98e-20 6.42e-01 5.63e-04 1.36e+00 1.36e-03
...
3.05e+00  -3.55e-19 6.42e-01 4.77e-04 1.36e+00 1.15e-03
...
3.14e+00   4.09e-19 6.42e-01 4.04e-04 1.36e+00 9.75e-04
...
3.22e+00  -3.11e-19 6.42e-01 3.42e-04 1.36e+00 8.26e-04
...
3.31e+00   1.68e-19 6.42e-01 2.90e-04 1.36e+00 7.00e-04
...
3.40e+00  -4.94e-20 6.42e-01 2.46e-04 1.36e+00 5.93e-04
...
3.48e+00  -1.60e-20 6.43e-01 2.08e-04 1.36e+00 5.02e-04
...
3.57e+00   3.66e-20 6.43e-01 1.76e-04 1.36e+00 4.26e-04
...
3.66e+00  -3.24e-20 6.43e-01 1.49e-04 1.36e+00 3.61e-04
...
3.75e+00   2.09e-20 6.43e-01 1.27e-04 1.36e+00 3.06e-04
...
3.83e+00  -9.01e-21 6.43e-01 1.07e-04 1.36e+00 2.59e-04
...
3.92e+00   9.86e-22 6.43e-01 9.09e-05 1.36e+00 2.19e-04
...
4.01e+00   2.58e-21 6.43e-01 7.70e-05 1.36e+00 1.86e-04
...
4.09e+00  -2.91e-21 6.43e-01 6.52e-05 1.36e+00 1.57e-04
...
4.18e+00   2.30e-21 6.43e-01 5.53e-05 1.36e+00 1.33e-04
...
5.00e+00   2.68e-23 6.43e-01 1.16e-05 1.36e+00 2.81e-05

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 6/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_4, iteration_5, iteration_6, iteration_7, iteration_11, iteration_14)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0, sim_data, diff_final)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 15
## Thoughts
The experiment with increased initial concentrations of id_obek and id_36d9 shows that both species maintain higher concentrations over time, and downstream species id_e6fd and id_8mtc increase accordingly. This suggests that id_36d9 might be produced directly from id_obek as well as from id_e6fd.

I will update the model to include a direct reaction from id_obek to id_36d9 in addition to the existing reactions. Then I will simulate and compare the model to the original data to check if this improves the fit.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Load the input SBML model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
for i in range(num_reactions - 1, -1, -1):
    model.removeReaction(i)

# Helper function to add a reaction
def add_reaction(model, reaction_id, reactants, products):
    reaction = model.createReaction()
    reaction.setId(reaction_id)
    reaction.setReversible(False)
    reaction.setFast(False)
    for species_id, stoich in reactants.items():
        reactant = reaction.createReactant()
        reactant.setSpecies(species_id)
        reactant.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        reactant.setConstant(False)
    for species_id, stoich in products.items():
        product = reaction.createProduct()
        product.setSpecies(species_id)
        product.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        product.setConstant(True)

# Add reactions including the new direct conversion from id_obek to id_36d9
add_reaction(model, "r1", {"id_3fdc": 1}, {"id_obek": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r2", {"id_obek": 1}, {"id_e6fd": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r3", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_36d9": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r4", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_8mtc": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r5", {"id_obek": 1}, {"id_36d9": 1})  # New direct reaction

# Write the updated SBML to string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
final_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(final_sbml)

# Access the original observation data for comparison
original_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Calculate the difference between simulation and original data at final time point
final_time = original_data['Time'].max()
sim_final = sim_data[sim_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]
orig_final = original_data[original_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]

diff = (sim_final - orig_final).abs()

print("Difference between simulation and original data at final time point after adding direct id_obek to id_36d9 reaction:")
print(diff)

# Save simulation data for further analysis if needed
shared_variables.add('sim_data', sim_data)
shared_variables.add('diff_final', diff)
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Difference between simulation and original data at final time point after adding direct id_obek to id_36d9 reaction:
id_obek    0.142839
id_e6fd    0.000012
id_36d9    0.857121
id_8mtc    0.000028
Time       0.000000
Name: 287, dtype: float64

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 5/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_4, iteration_5, iteration_6, iteration_7, iteration_11, iteration_14)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0, sim_data, diff_final)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 16
## Thoughts
Adding the direct reaction from id_obek to id_36d9 did not improve the model fit, as the differences remain large for id_obek and id_36d9. This suggests that the model might be missing degradation or outflow reactions for some species, especially id_obek and id_36d9, which could explain the discrepancy.

I will add degradation reactions for id_obek and id_36d9 to the model and then simulate to check if this improves the fit.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Load the input SBML model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
for i in range(num_reactions - 1, -1, -1):
    model.removeReaction(i)

# Helper function to add a reaction
def add_reaction(model, reaction_id, reactants, products):
    reaction = model.createReaction()
    reaction.setId(reaction_id)
    reaction.setReversible(False)
    reaction.setFast(False)
    for species_id, stoich in reactants.items():
        reactant = reaction.createReactant()
        reactant.setSpecies(species_id)
        reactant.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        reactant.setConstant(False)
    for species_id, stoich in products.items():
        product = reaction.createProduct()
        product.setSpecies(species_id)
        product.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        product.setConstant(True)

# Add reactions including degradation of id_obek and id_36d9
add_reaction(model, "r1", {"id_3fdc": 1}, {"id_obek": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r2", {"id_obek": 1}, {"id_e6fd": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r3", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_36d9": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r4", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_8mtc": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r5", {"id_obek": 1}, {})  # Degradation of id_obek
add_reaction(model, "r6", {"id_36d9": 1}, {})  # Degradation of id_36d9

# Write the updated SBML to string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
final_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(final_sbml)

# Access the original observation data for comparison
original_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Calculate the difference between simulation and original data at final time point
final_time = original_data['Time'].max()
sim_final = sim_data[sim_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]
orig_final = original_data[original_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]

diff = (sim_final - orig_final).abs()

print("Difference between simulation and original data at final time point after adding degradation reactions:")
print(diff)

# Save simulation data for further analysis if needed
shared_variables.add('sim_data', sim_data)
shared_variables.add('diff_final', diff)
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Difference between simulation and original data at final time point after adding degradation reactions:
id_obek    0.142839
id_e6fd    0.000012
id_36d9    0.857121
id_8mtc    0.000028
Time       0.000000
Name: 287, dtype: float64

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 4/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_4, iteration_5, iteration_6, iteration_7, iteration_11, iteration_14)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0, sim_data, diff_final)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 17
## Thoughts
Adding degradation reactions for id_obek and id_36d9 did not improve the model fit, indicating that the issue might not be due to missing degradation but possibly due to reaction kinetics or missing reversible reactions.

Since the current model only includes irreversible reactions, I will test if making some reactions reversible improves the fit. Specifically, I will make the reaction from id_e6fd to id_36d9 reversible, as this might better capture the dynamics.

I will update the model accordingly and simulate to check the fit.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Load the input SBML model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
for i in range(num_reactions - 1, -1, -1):
    model.removeReaction(i)

# Helper function to add a reaction with reversibility option
def add_reaction(model, reaction_id, reactants, products, reversible=False):
    reaction = model.createReaction()
    reaction.setId(reaction_id)
    reaction.setReversible(reversible)
    reaction.setFast(False)
    for species_id, stoich in reactants.items():
        reactant = reaction.createReactant()
        reactant.setSpecies(species_id)
        reactant.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        reactant.setConstant(False)
    for species_id, stoich in products.items():
        product = reaction.createProduct()
        product.setSpecies(species_id)
        product.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        product.setConstant(True)

# Add reactions with r3 reversible
add_reaction(model, "r1", {"id_3fdc": 1}, {"id_obek": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r2", {"id_obek": 1}, {"id_e6fd": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r3", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_36d9": 1}, reversible=True)  # reversible reaction
add_reaction(model, "r4", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_8mtc": 1})

# Write the updated SBML to string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
final_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(final_sbml)

# Access the original observation data for comparison
original_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Calculate the difference between simulation and original data at final time point
final_time = original_data['Time'].max()
sim_final = sim_data[sim_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]
orig_final = original_data[original_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]

diff = (sim_final - orig_final).abs()

print("Difference between simulation and original data at final time point after making r3 reversible:")
print(diff)

# Save simulation data for further analysis if needed
shared_variables.add('sim_data', sim_data)
shared_variables.add('diff_final', diff)
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Difference between simulation and original data at final time point after making r3 reversible:
id_obek    0.142839
id_e6fd    0.000012
id_36d9    0.857121
id_8mtc    0.000028
Time       0.000000
Name: 287, dtype: float64

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 3/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_4, iteration_5, iteration_6, iteration_7, iteration_11, iteration_14)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0, sim_data, diff_final)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 18
## Thoughts
Making the reaction from id_e6fd to id_36d9 reversible did not improve the model fit. The persistent large difference for id_obek and id_36d9 suggests that the model might be missing additional reactions or feedback loops.

Given the data, it is possible that id_36d9 is produced from id_3fdc directly, bypassing intermediates, or that id_obek is converted back to id_3fdc. I will test adding a direct reaction from id_3fdc to id_36d9 and a reversible reaction between id_obek and id_3fdc.

I will update the model accordingly and simulate to check the fit.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Load the input SBML model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
for i in range(num_reactions - 1, -1, -1):
    model.removeReaction(i)

# Helper function to add a reaction with reversibility option
def add_reaction(model, reaction_id, reactants, products, reversible=False):
    reaction = model.createReaction()
    reaction.setId(reaction_id)
    reaction.setReversible(reversible)
    reaction.setFast(False)
    for species_id, stoich in reactants.items():
        reactant = reaction.createReactant()
        reactant.setSpecies(species_id)
        reactant.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        reactant.setConstant(False)
    for species_id, stoich in products.items():
        product = reaction.createProduct()
        product.setSpecies(species_id)
        product.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        product.setConstant(True)

# Add reactions including new direct and reversible reactions
add_reaction(model, "r1", {"id_3fdc": 1}, {"id_obek": 1}, reversible=True)  # reversible reaction between id_3fdc and id_obek
add_reaction(model, "r2", {"id_obek": 1}, {"id_e6fd": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r3", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_36d9": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r4", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_8mtc": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r5", {"id_3fdc": 1}, {"id_36d9": 1})  # direct reaction from id_3fdc to id_36d9

# Write the updated SBML to string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
final_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(final_sbml)

# Access the original observation data for comparison
original_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Calculate the difference between simulation and original data at final time point
final_time = original_data['Time'].max()
sim_final = sim_data[sim_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]
orig_final = original_data[original_data['Time'] == final_time].iloc[0, 1:]

diff = (sim_final - orig_final).abs()

print("Difference between simulation and original data at final time point after adding reversible r1 and direct r5:")
print(diff)

# Save simulation data for further analysis if needed
shared_variables.add('sim_data', sim_data)
shared_variables.add('diff_final', diff)
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Difference between simulation and original data at final time point after adding reversible r1 and direct r5:
id_obek    0.142839
id_e6fd    0.000012
id_36d9    0.857121
id_8mtc    0.000028
Time       0.000000
Name: 287, dtype: float64

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 2/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_4, iteration_5, iteration_6, iteration_7, iteration_11, iteration_14)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (df_iteration_0, corr_iteration_0, avg_rates_iteration_0, sim_data, diff_final)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 19
## Thoughts
The addition of reversible reaction between id_3fdc and id_obek and direct reaction from id_3fdc to id_36d9 did not improve the model fit. The persistent large difference for id_obek and id_36d9 suggests that the current reaction network structure might be insufficient or the kinetics parameters (not modeled here) are critical.

Given the constraints and the data, the best explanation is the sequential reaction chain with side product formation:

- id_3fdc → id_obek
- id_obek → id_e6fd
- id_e6fd → id_36d9
- id_e6fd → id_8mtc

No additional reactions or reversibility significantly improve the fit.

I will submit this model as the final hypothesis.

## Action

### Submit
```python
import libsbml

# Load the input SBML model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
for i in range(num_reactions - 1, -1, -1):
    model.removeReaction(i)

# Helper function to add a reaction
def add_reaction(model, reaction_id, reactants, products):
    reaction = model.createReaction()
    reaction.setId(reaction_id)
    reaction.setReversible(False)
    reaction.setFast(False)
    for species_id, stoich in reactants.items():
        reactant = reaction.createReactant()
        reactant.setSpecies(species_id)
        reactant.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        reactant.setConstant(False)
    for species_id, stoich in products.items():
        product = reaction.createProduct()
        product.setSpecies(species_id)
        product.setStoichiometry(stoich)
        product.setConstant(True)

# Add final reactions
add_reaction(model, "r1", {"id_3fdc": 1}, {"id_obek": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r2", {"id_obek": 1}, {"id_e6fd": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r3", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_36d9": 1})
add_reaction(model, "r4", {"id_e6fd": 1}, {"id_8mtc": 1})

# Write the updated SBML to string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
final_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
```
