
                # Interation 0

                ## Task Info
                You are investigating a biological system where all species are observable. Your goal is to discover the missing reactions. You do not need to add new species.


                ## Incomplete SBML Model. You can assess it as input_sbml_string.

                <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<sbml xmlns="http://www.sbml.org/sbml/level2" level="2" version="1">
  <model id="id_f8sp">
    <listOfUnitDefinitions>
      <unitDefinition id="id_h2ru">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="item"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
      <unitDefinition id="id_co3x">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="second" multiplier="3600"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
    </listOfUnitDefinitions>
    <listOfCompartments>
      <compartment id="id_o2gv" size="1"/>
    </listOfCompartments>
    <listOfSpecies>
      <species id="id_bh7k" compartment="id_o2gv" initialConcentration="0.2"/>
      <species id="id_81sv" compartment="id_o2gv" initialConcentration="0.02"/>
      <species id="id_sr8t" compartment="id_o2gv" initialConcentration="0.5"/>
    </listOfSpecies>
  </model>
</sbml>


                ## Max iterations
                20

                Format your response according to the instructions in the system message.
                
## Thoughts

The provided SBML model defines three species (`id_bh7k`, `id_81sv`, `id_sr8t`) but does not include any reactions. My goal is to discover the missing reactions/mechanisms. Since all species are observable, I can request time-course data for all of them. The first step should be to observe the system under default conditions to see how the concentrations of these species change over time. This will provide a baseline for understanding the system's dynamics and help hypothesize possible reactions.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
    "action": "observe",
    "meta_data": {}
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_0
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_0]

Total size: 1001 rows × 4 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_0] for the full data

Time   id_bh7k  id_81sv  id_sr8t
0  2.00e-01 2.00e-02 5.00e-01
...
2.00e-01  2.58e-01 2.51e-02 4.07e-01
...
4.00e-01  2.89e-01 3.06e-02 3.34e-01
...
6.00e-01  3.03e-01 3.66e-02 2.77e-01
...
8.00e-01  3.04e-01 4.36e-02 2.33e-01
...
1.00e+00  2.97e-01 5.21e-02 2.00e-01
...
1.20e+00  2.86e-01 6.26e-02 1.76e-01
...
1.40e+00  2.73e-01 7.59e-02 1.60e-01
...
1.60e+00  2.59e-01 9.30e-02 1.51e-01
...
1.80e+00  2.46e-01 1.15e-01 1.49e-01
...
2.00e+00  2.36e-01 1.44e-01 1.55e-01
...
2.20e+00  2.30e-01 1.80e-01 1.68e-01
...
2.40e+00  2.28e-01 2.27e-01 1.89e-01
...
2.60e+00  2.31e-01 2.86e-01 2.21e-01
...
2.80e+00  2.42e-01 3.59e-01 2.64e-01
...
3.00e+00  2.61e-01 4.44e-01 3.20e-01
...
3.20e+00  2.90e-01 5.41e-01 3.90e-01
...
3.40e+00  3.29e-01 6.42e-01 4.73e-01
...
3.60e+00  3.79e-01 7.38e-01 5.66e-01
...
3.80e+00  4.41e-01 8.13e-01 6.64e-01
...
4.00e+00  5.12e-01 8.53e-01 7.59e-01
...
4.20e+00  5.89e-01 8.47e-01 8.39e-01
...
4.40e+00  6.67e-01 7.94e-01 8.95e-01
...
4.60e+00  7.41e-01 7.03e-01 9.20e-01
...
4.80e+00  8.04e-01 5.92e-01 9.12e-01
...
5.00e+00  8.51e-01 4.78e-01 8.76e-01
...
5.20e+00  8.82e-01 3.75e-01 8.17e-01
...
5.40e+00  8.93e-01 2.90e-01 7.44e-01
...
5.60e+00  8.88e-01 2.24e-01 6.66e-01
...
5.80e+00  8.68e-01 1.74e-01 5.87e-01
...
6.00e+00  8.35e-01 1.38e-01 5.13e-01
...
6.20e+00  7.94e-01 1.13e-01 4.45e-01
...
6.40e+00  7.46e-01 9.52e-02 3.85e-01
...
6.60e+00  6.95e-01 8.33e-02 3.33e-01
...
6.80e+00  6.43e-01 7.57e-02 2.88e-01
...
7.00e+00  5.91e-01 7.16e-02 2.51e-01
...
7.20e+00  5.41e-01 7.02e-02 2.21e-01
...
7.40e+00  4.94e-01 7.15e-02 1.96e-01
...
7.60e+00  4.50e-01 7.52e-02 1.77e-01
...
7.80e+00  4.10e-01 8.17e-02 1.63e-01
...
8.00e+00  3.74e-01 9.12e-02 1.54e-01
...
8.20e+00  3.43e-01 1.04e-01 1.50e-01
...
8.40e+00  3.17e-01 1.22e-01 1.51e-01
...
8.60e+00  2.95e-01 1.45e-01 1.57e-01
...
8.80e+00  2.80e-01 1.75e-01 1.69e-01
...
9.00e+00  2.69e-01 2.13e-01 1.88e-01
...
9.20e+00  2.66e-01 2.61e-01 2.15e-01
...
9.40e+00  2.69e-01 3.20e-01 2.51e-01
...
9.60e+00  2.79e-01 3.90e-01 2.97e-01
...
1.00e+01  3.28e-01 5.56e-01 4.23e-01

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 20/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 1
## Thoughts

From the observation experiment, all three species (`id_bh7k`, `id_81sv`, `id_sr8t`) show dynamic changes in concentration over time, indicating that they are involved in one or more reactions. The concentrations oscillate in a somewhat periodic manner, suggesting the possibility of a cyclic or feedback mechanism. To better hypothesize the underlying reactions, it would be helpful to see how the system responds to perturbations in the initial concentrations of each species. This can help distinguish between different possible network topologies (e.g., linear, cyclic, autocatalytic).

A logical next step is to perturb the initial concentration of one species (e.g., increase `id_bh7k` while keeping others at default) and observe the system's response. This will help clarify the directionality and connectivity of the reactions.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
    "action": "change_initial_concentration",
    "meta_data": {
        "id_bh7k": 0.5
    }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_1
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_1]

Total size: 1001 rows × 4 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_1] for the full data

Time   id_bh7k  id_81sv  id_sr8t
0  5.00e-01 2.00e-02 5.00e-01
...
2.00e-01  5.08e-01 2.05e-02 4.07e-01
...
4.00e-01  4.98e-01 2.11e-02 3.32e-01
...
6.00e-01  4.77e-01 2.19e-02 2.72e-01
...
8.00e-01  4.48e-01 2.32e-02 2.25e-01
...
1.00e+00  4.15e-01 2.51e-02 1.87e-01
...
1.20e+00  3.81e-01 2.79e-02 1.57e-01
...
1.40e+00  3.48e-01 3.18e-02 1.34e-01
...
1.60e+00  3.15e-01 3.72e-02 1.17e-01
...
1.80e+00  2.86e-01 4.44e-02 1.05e-01
...
2.00e+00  2.59e-01 5.41e-02 9.73e-02
...
2.20e+00  2.35e-01 6.73e-02 9.44e-02
...
2.40e+00  2.16e-01 8.50e-02 9.62e-02
...
2.60e+00  2.00e-01 1.09e-01 1.03e-01
...
2.80e+00  1.89e-01 1.40e-01 1.16e-01
...
3.00e+00  1.84e-01 1.83e-01 1.37e-01
...
3.20e+00  1.84e-01 2.38e-01 1.66e-01
...
3.40e+00  1.91e-01 3.09e-01 2.07e-01
...
3.60e+00  2.07e-01 3.98e-01 2.62e-01
...
3.80e+00  2.32e-01 5.05e-01 3.32e-01
...
4.00e+00  2.70e-01 6.27e-01 4.19e-01
...
4.20e+00  3.20e-01 7.52e-01 5.23e-01
...
4.40e+00  3.84e-01 8.66e-01 6.38e-01
...
4.60e+00  4.62e-01 9.45e-01 7.58e-01
...
4.80e+00  5.50e-01 9.70e-01 8.67e-01
...
5.00e+00  6.44e-01 9.31e-01 9.53e-01
...
5.20e+00  7.35e-01 8.33e-01 1.00e+00
...
5.40e+00  8.18e-01 6.99e-01 1.01e+00
...
5.60e+00  8.84e-01 5.55e-01 9.80e-01
...
5.80e+00  9.29e-01 4.23e-01 9.17e-01
...
6.00e+00  9.53e-01 3.14e-01 8.34e-01
...
6.20e+00  9.54e-01 2.31e-01 7.42e-01
...
6.40e+00  9.36e-01 1.71e-01 6.48e-01
...
6.60e+00  9.03e-01 1.29e-01 5.60e-01
...
6.80e+00  8.59e-01 1.00e-01 4.80e-01
...
7.00e+00  8.07e-01 8.07e-02 4.09e-01
...
7.20e+00  7.50e-01 6.77e-02 3.48e-01
...
7.40e+00  6.91e-01 5.93e-02 2.97e-01
...
7.60e+00  6.32e-01 5.42e-02 2.53e-01
...
7.80e+00  5.75e-01 5.17e-02 2.17e-01
...
8.00e+00  5.21e-01 5.14e-02 1.88e-01
...
8.20e+00  4.71e-01 5.32e-02 1.65e-01
...
8.40e+00  4.24e-01 5.70e-02 1.47e-01
...
8.60e+00  3.83e-01 6.31e-02 1.34e-01
...
8.80e+00  3.46e-01 7.19e-02 1.26e-01
...
9.00e+00  3.14e-01 8.41e-02 1.22e-01
...
9.20e+00  2.87e-01 1.00e-01 1.23e-01
...
9.40e+00  2.65e-01 1.22e-01 1.29e-01
...
9.60e+00  2.48e-01 1.51e-01 1.40e-01
...
1.00e+01  2.32e-01 2.36e-01 1.84e-01

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 19/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 2
## Thoughts

Perturbing the initial concentration of `id_bh7k` to 0.5 (from 0.2) while keeping the others constant led to a similar oscillatory pattern, but with higher amplitude and a phase shift. The system still cycles through the three species, suggesting a cyclic or feedback network. The time courses suggest that `id_bh7k` is converted to `id_81sv`, which is then converted to `id_sr8t`, and possibly back to `id_bh7k`, forming a cycle.

To further test this hypothesis, it would be informative to perturb another species, such as increasing the initial concentration of `id_81sv`, and observe the system's response. This will help confirm the directionality and connectivity of the reactions.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
    "action": "change_initial_concentration",
    "meta_data": {
        "id_81sv": 0.5
    }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_2
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_2]

Total size: 1001 rows × 4 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_2] for the full data

Time   id_bh7k  id_81sv  id_sr8t
0  2.00e-01 5.00e-01 5.00e-01
...
2.00e-01  2.73e-01 6.26e-01 5.54e-01
...
4.00e-01  3.47e-01 7.43e-01 6.30e-01
...
6.00e-01  4.26e-01 8.33e-01 7.19e-01
...
8.00e-01  5.10e-01 8.79e-01 8.09e-01
...
1.00e+00  5.97e-01 8.71e-01 8.86e-01
...
1.20e+00  6.83e-01 8.09e-01 9.38e-01
...
1.40e+00  7.62e-01 7.07e-01 9.57e-01
...
1.60e+00  8.28e-01 5.85e-01 9.42e-01
...
1.80e+00  8.77e-01 4.64e-01 8.96e-01
...
2.00e+00  9.06e-01 3.57e-01 8.29e-01
...
2.20e+00  9.16e-01 2.71e-01 7.49e-01
...
2.40e+00  9.07e-01 2.06e-01 6.65e-01
...
2.60e+00  8.83e-01 1.58e-01 5.82e-01
...
2.80e+00  8.46e-01 1.25e-01 5.05e-01
...
3.00e+00  8.01e-01 1.01e-01 4.35e-01
...
3.20e+00  7.50e-01 8.48e-02 3.74e-01
...
3.40e+00  6.96e-01 7.41e-02 3.21e-01
...
3.60e+00  6.42e-01 6.74e-02 2.77e-01
...
3.80e+00  5.88e-01 6.38e-02 2.40e-01
...
4.00e+00  5.36e-01 6.28e-02 2.09e-01
...
4.20e+00  4.87e-01 6.42e-02 1.85e-01
...
4.40e+00  4.42e-01 6.79e-02 1.66e-01
...
4.60e+00  4.01e-01 7.42e-02 1.53e-01
...
4.80e+00  3.65e-01 8.34e-02 1.44e-01
...
5.00e+00  3.33e-01 9.61e-02 1.39e-01
...
5.20e+00  3.06e-01 1.13e-01 1.40e-01
...
5.40e+00  2.85e-01 1.36e-01 1.46e-01
...
5.60e+00  2.68e-01 1.65e-01 1.58e-01
...
5.80e+00  2.57e-01 2.03e-01 1.76e-01
...
6.00e+00  2.53e-01 2.51e-01 2.02e-01
...
6.20e+00  2.56e-01 3.10e-01 2.38e-01
...
6.40e+00  2.66e-01 3.81e-01 2.84e-01
...
6.60e+00  2.85e-01 4.64e-01 3.42e-01
...
6.80e+00  3.14e-01 5.55e-01 4.12e-01
...
7.00e+00  3.54e-01 6.47e-01 4.93e-01
...
7.20e+00  4.04e-01 7.30e-01 5.82e-01
...
7.40e+00  4.64e-01 7.91e-01 6.73e-01
...
7.60e+00  5.32e-01 8.16e-01 7.57e-01
...
7.80e+00  6.04e-01 8.00e-01 8.26e-01
...
8.00e+00  6.76e-01 7.43e-01 8.71e-01
...
8.20e+00  7.42e-01 6.56e-01 8.88e-01
...
8.40e+00  7.98e-01 5.53e-01 8.75e-01
...
8.60e+00  8.39e-01 4.49e-01 8.36e-01
...
8.80e+00  8.64e-01 3.57e-01 7.79e-01
...
9.00e+00  8.71e-01 2.80e-01 7.10e-01
...
9.20e+00  8.63e-01 2.20e-01 6.36e-01
...
9.40e+00  8.41e-01 1.74e-01 5.63e-01
...
9.60e+00  8.09e-01 1.41e-01 4.94e-01
...
1.00e+01  7.23e-01 1.01e-01 3.75e-01

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 18/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 3
## Thoughts

Perturbing `id_81sv` to a higher initial concentration (0.5) again results in a similar oscillatory pattern, but with a phase shift and higher amplitude, similar to the previous perturbations. The system appears to cycle through the three species, supporting the hypothesis of a cyclic network: `id_bh7k` → `id_81sv` → `id_sr8t` → `id_bh7k`.

To further confirm this, it would be useful to perturb the third species, `id_sr8t`, and observe the system's response. If the cyclic hypothesis is correct, we should see a similar oscillatory pattern, with the phase and amplitude shifted according to the initial condition.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
    "action": "change_initial_concentration",
    "meta_data": {
        "id_sr8t": 0.5
    }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_3
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_3]

Total size: 1001 rows × 4 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_3] for the full data

Time   id_bh7k  id_81sv  id_sr8t
0  2.00e-01 2.00e-02 5.00e-01
...
2.00e-01  2.58e-01 2.51e-02 4.07e-01
...
4.00e-01  2.89e-01 3.06e-02 3.34e-01
...
6.00e-01  3.03e-01 3.66e-02 2.77e-01
...
8.00e-01  3.04e-01 4.36e-02 2.33e-01
...
1.00e+00  2.97e-01 5.21e-02 2.00e-01
...
1.20e+00  2.86e-01 6.26e-02 1.76e-01
...
1.40e+00  2.73e-01 7.59e-02 1.60e-01
...
1.60e+00  2.59e-01 9.30e-02 1.51e-01
...
1.80e+00  2.46e-01 1.15e-01 1.49e-01
...
2.00e+00  2.36e-01 1.44e-01 1.55e-01
...
2.20e+00  2.30e-01 1.80e-01 1.68e-01
...
2.40e+00  2.28e-01 2.27e-01 1.89e-01
...
2.60e+00  2.31e-01 2.86e-01 2.21e-01
...
2.80e+00  2.42e-01 3.59e-01 2.64e-01
...
3.00e+00  2.61e-01 4.44e-01 3.20e-01
...
3.20e+00  2.90e-01 5.41e-01 3.90e-01
...
3.40e+00  3.29e-01 6.42e-01 4.73e-01
...
3.60e+00  3.79e-01 7.38e-01 5.66e-01
...
3.80e+00  4.41e-01 8.13e-01 6.64e-01
...
4.00e+00  5.12e-01 8.53e-01 7.59e-01
...
4.20e+00  5.89e-01 8.47e-01 8.39e-01
...
4.40e+00  6.67e-01 7.94e-01 8.95e-01
...
4.60e+00  7.41e-01 7.03e-01 9.20e-01
...
4.80e+00  8.04e-01 5.92e-01 9.12e-01
...
5.00e+00  8.51e-01 4.78e-01 8.76e-01
...
5.20e+00  8.82e-01 3.75e-01 8.17e-01
...
5.40e+00  8.93e-01 2.90e-01 7.44e-01
...
5.60e+00  8.88e-01 2.24e-01 6.66e-01
...
5.80e+00  8.68e-01 1.74e-01 5.87e-01
...
6.00e+00  8.35e-01 1.38e-01 5.13e-01
...
6.20e+00  7.94e-01 1.13e-01 4.45e-01
...
6.40e+00  7.46e-01 9.52e-02 3.85e-01
...
6.60e+00  6.95e-01 8.33e-02 3.33e-01
...
6.80e+00  6.43e-01 7.57e-02 2.88e-01
...
7.00e+00  5.91e-01 7.16e-02 2.51e-01
...
7.20e+00  5.41e-01 7.02e-02 2.21e-01
...
7.40e+00  4.94e-01 7.15e-02 1.96e-01
...
7.60e+00  4.50e-01 7.52e-02 1.77e-01
...
7.80e+00  4.10e-01 8.17e-02 1.63e-01
...
8.00e+00  3.74e-01 9.12e-02 1.54e-01
...
8.20e+00  3.43e-01 1.04e-01 1.50e-01
...
8.40e+00  3.17e-01 1.22e-01 1.51e-01
...
8.60e+00  2.95e-01 1.45e-01 1.57e-01
...
8.80e+00  2.80e-01 1.75e-01 1.69e-01
...
9.00e+00  2.69e-01 2.13e-01 1.88e-01
...
9.20e+00  2.66e-01 2.61e-01 2.15e-01
...
9.40e+00  2.69e-01 3.20e-01 2.51e-01
...
9.60e+00  2.79e-01 3.90e-01 2.97e-01
...
1.00e+01  3.28e-01 5.56e-01 4.23e-01

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 17/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 4
## Thoughts

The results of perturbing `id_sr8t` to 0.5 are nearly identical to the original observation (iteration_0), suggesting that the default initial concentration for `id_sr8t` is already 0.5. This further supports the idea that the system is cyclic, as the oscillatory pattern persists regardless of which species is perturbed, with only the phase and amplitude changing.

Given the oscillatory and cyclic nature of the data, a plausible minimal model is a cycle of three irreversible reactions:
- `id_bh7k` → `id_81sv`
- `id_81sv` → `id_sr8t`
- `id_sr8t` → `id_bh7k`

The next step is to analyze the time series data quantitatively to estimate the kinetic parameters and confirm that a simple cyclic model can reproduce the observed dynamics. I will plot the time series and look for features such as the period and amplitude of oscillations, and then attempt to fit a simple cyclic model.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Plot the time series for the default observation
df = experiment_history['iteration_0']

plt.figure(figsize=(10,6))
plt.plot(df['Time'], df['id_bh7k'], label='id_bh7k')
plt.plot(df['Time'], df['id_81sv'], label='id_81sv')
plt.plot(df['Time'], df['id_sr8t'], label='id_sr8t')
plt.xlabel('Time')
plt.ylabel('Concentration')
plt.legend()
plt.title('Time Series of All Species (Default Observation)')
plt.show()
```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 Unauthorized modules matplotlib detected. Only these modules are allowed: numpy, pandas, libsbml, math, scipy, jax, sklearn, io, traceback.

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 16/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 5
## Thoughts

Matplotlib is not allowed, so I cannot plot the data directly. Instead, I will analyze the time series data numerically using pandas and numpy. I will:
- Examine the minimum, maximum, and mean concentrations for each species.
- Calculate the time points at which each species reaches its maximum and minimum to estimate the period and phase relationships.
- Look for evidence of conservation (e.g., sum of concentrations) to infer if the system is closed.

This will help confirm the cyclic model and provide clues for parameter estimation.

## Action

### Code
```python
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

df = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Basic statistics
stats = df.describe()

# Find time points of max and min for each species
max_times = {col: df['Time'][df[col].idxmax()] for col in ['id_bh7k', 'id_81sv', 'id_sr8t']}
min_times = {col: df['Time'][df[col].idxmin()] for col in ['id_bh7k', 'id_81sv', 'id_sr8t']}

# Check if the sum of concentrations is conserved
df['total'] = df['id_bh7k'] + df['id_81sv'] + df['id_sr8t']
total_stats = df['total'].describe()

print("Basic statistics:\n", stats)
print("\nTime of max for each species:", max_times)
print("Time of min for each species:", min_times)
print("\nTotal concentration stats:\n", total_stats)
print("\nFirst 10 rows of total concentration:\n", df[['Time', 'total']].head(10))
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Basic statistics:
            id_bh7k      id_81sv      id_sr8t         Time
count  1001.000000  1001.000000  1001.000000  1001.000000
mean      0.450473     0.273792     0.380433     5.000000
std       0.225016     0.248030     0.244511     2.891081
min       0.200000     0.020000     0.149086     0.000000
25%       0.271958     0.079447     0.179603     2.500000
50%       0.322935     0.163916     0.282484     5.000000
75%       0.636138     0.417241     0.513807     7.500000
max       0.893720     0.856521     0.920938    10.000000

Time of max for each species: {'id_bh7k': np.float64(5.43), 'id_81sv': np.float64(4.08), 'id_sr8t': np.float64(4.65)}
Time of min for each species: {'id_bh7k': np.float64(0.0), 'id_81sv': np.float64(0.0), 'id_sr8t': np.float64(1.75)}

Total concentration stats:
 count    1001.000000
mean        1.104698
std         0.597849
min         0.503034
25%         0.618682
50%         0.843312
75%         1.513924
max         2.368777
Name: total, dtype: float64

First 10 rows of total concentration:
    Time     total
0  0.00  0.720000
1  0.01  0.718737
2  0.02  0.717447
3  0.03  0.716129
4  0.04  0.714784
5  0.05  0.713414
6  0.06  0.712018
7  0.07  0.710598
8  0.08  0.709155
9  0.09  0.707688

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 15/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 6
## Thoughts

The statistics show that the concentrations of all three species oscillate between their minimum and maximum values, supporting the cyclic model hypothesis. However, the total concentration is not conserved; it increases significantly over time (from ~0.7 to >2.3), indicating that there is likely an input (source) or autocatalytic reaction in the system, or that one or more reactions are not simple conversions but involve net production.

Given the oscillatory pattern and the increase in total concentration, a plausible model is:
- A cyclic conversion between the three species (as previously hypothesized).
- An additional source reaction that produces one of the species (likely `id_bh7k`, since it is the first in the cycle and its concentration increases over time).

To test this, I will attempt to build a simple SBML model with:
1. A source reaction: ∅ → `id_bh7k`
2. `id_bh7k` → `id_81sv`
3. `id_81sv` → `id_sr8t`
4. `id_sr8t` → `id_bh7k`

I will use mass-action kinetics with arbitrary initial rate constants and simulate the model to see if it qualitatively matches the observed data.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Load the incomplete SBML model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add a source reaction: source -> id_bh7k
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("source_to_bh7k")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)

# No reactants (source)
# Product: id_bh7k
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(True)

# Kinetic law for source reaction
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
p0 = model.createParameter()
p0.setId("k0")
p0.setValue(0.05)
kl0.setFormula("k0")

# id_bh7k -> id_81sv
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("bh7k_to_81sv")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1 = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
reactant1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_81sv")
product1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1.setConstant(True)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
p1 = model.createParameter()
p1.setId("k1")
p1.setValue(0.2)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_bh7k")

# id_81sv -> id_sr8t
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("81sv_to_sr8t")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2 = reaction2.createProduct()
product2.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
product2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2.setConstant(True)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
p2 = model.createParameter()
p2.setId("k2")
p2.setValue(0.2)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_81sv")

# id_sr8t -> id_bh7k
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("sr8t_to_bh7k")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
product3 = reaction3.createProduct()
product3.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product3.setConstant(True)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
p3 = model.createParameter()
p3.setId("k3")
p3.setValue(0.2)
kl3.setFormula("k3 * id_sr8t")

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
test_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare with experiment
sim_df = simulate(test_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml", test_sbml)
print(sim_df.head(10))
```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 We could not run simulations on your SBML model. This is the error: Missing a required XML attribute. The http://www.sbml.org/sbml/level2 reaction attribute 'id' is required.


## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 14/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 7
## Thoughts

The error message indicates that a required XML attribute (`id`) is missing for one or more reactions. This may be due to how the reactions or their components were created, or possibly due to a missing attribute in the kinetic law or parameters. I will carefully reconstruct the SBML model, ensuring that all required attributes are set, especially for reactions, reactants, products, and parameters. I will also check that each kinetic law is properly associated with its reaction and that all parameters are uniquely defined.

I will also clear any possible duplicate parameter IDs and ensure that the kinetic law formulas reference the correct parameter and species IDs.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Reload the base model to avoid duplicate parameters
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Helper to add a parameter if not already present
def add_parameter(model, pid, value):
    if model.getParameter(pid) is None:
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(pid)
        p.setValue(value)
        return p
    return model.getParameter(pid)

# Source reaction: ∅ → id_bh7k
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("source_to_bh7k")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(True)
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k0", 0.05)
kl0.setFormula("k0")
reaction0.setKineticLaw(kl0)

# id_bh7k → id_81sv
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("bh7k_to_81sv")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1 = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
reactant1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_81sv")
product1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1.setConstant(True)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k1", 0.2)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_bh7k")
reaction1.setKineticLaw(kl1)

# id_81sv → id_sr8t
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("81sv_to_sr8t")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2 = reaction2.createProduct()
product2.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
product2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2.setConstant(True)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k2", 0.2)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_81sv")
reaction2.setKineticLaw(kl2)

# id_sr8t → id_bh7k
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("sr8t_to_bh7k")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
product3 = reaction3.createProduct()
product3.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product3.setConstant(True)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k3", 0.2)
kl3.setFormula("k3 * id_sr8t")
reaction3.setKineticLaw(kl3)

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
test_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare with experiment
sim_df = simulate(test_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml", test_sbml)
print(sim_df.head(10))
```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 We could not run simulations on your SBML model. This is the error: Missing a required XML attribute. The http://www.sbml.org/sbml/level2 reaction attribute 'id' is required.


## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 13/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 8
## Thoughts

The error persists, indicating that the reaction `id` attribute is still not being set correctly, or there may be an issue with the SBML Level 2 requirements. It's possible that the SBML document is not being updated correctly, or that the reactions are not being added to the model as expected.

To debug, I will:
- Print out the IDs of all reactions in the model after adding them to ensure they are present.
- Print the SBML string to check the structure and see if the reactions are being added correctly.

This will help identify if the reactions are being created and assigned IDs as expected.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Reload the base model to avoid duplicate parameters
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Helper to add a parameter if not already present
def add_parameter(model, pid, value):
    if model.getParameter(pid) is None:
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(pid)
        p.setValue(value)
        return p
    return model.getParameter(pid)

# Source reaction: ∅ → id_bh7k
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("source_to_bh7k")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(True)
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k0", 0.05)
kl0.setFormula("k0")
reaction0.setKineticLaw(kl0)

# id_bh7k → id_81sv
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("bh7k_to_81sv")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1 = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
reactant1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_81sv")
product1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1.setConstant(True)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k1", 0.2)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_bh7k")
reaction1.setKineticLaw(kl1)

# id_81sv → id_sr8t
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("81sv_to_sr8t")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2 = reaction2.createProduct()
product2.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
product2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2.setConstant(True)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k2", 0.2)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_81sv")
reaction2.setKineticLaw(kl2)

# id_sr8t → id_bh7k
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("sr8t_to_bh7k")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
product3 = reaction3.createProduct()
product3.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product3.setConstant(True)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k3", 0.2)
kl3.setFormula("k3 * id_sr8t")
reaction3.setKineticLaw(kl3)

# Print all reaction IDs in the model
reaction_ids = [model.getReaction(i).getId() for i in range(model.getNumReactions())]
print("Reaction IDs in model:", reaction_ids)

# Print the SBML string for inspection
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
test_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
print(test_sbml)
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Reaction IDs in model: ['source_to_bh7k', 'bh7k_to_81sv', '', 'sr8t_to_bh7k']
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<sbml xmlns="http://www.sbml.org/sbml/level2" level="2" version="1">
  <model id="id_f8sp">
    <listOfUnitDefinitions>
      <unitDefinition id="id_h2ru">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="item"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
      <unitDefinition id="id_co3x">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="second" multiplier="3600"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
    </listOfUnitDefinitions>
    <listOfCompartments>
      <compartment id="id_o2gv" size="1"/>
    </listOfCompartments>
    <listOfSpecies>
      <species id="id_bh7k" compartment="id_o2gv" initialConcentration="0.2"/>
      <species id="id_81sv" compartment="id_o2gv" initialConcentration="0.02"/>
      <species id="id_sr8t" compartment="id_o2gv" initialConcentration="0.5"/>
    </listOfSpecies>
    <listOfParameters>
      <parameter id="k0" value="0.05"/>
      <parameter id="k1" value="0.2"/>
      <parameter id="k2" value="0.2"/>
      <parameter id="k3" value="0.2"/>
    </listOfParameters>
    <listOfReactions>
      <reaction id="source_to_bh7k" reversible="false" fast="false">
        <listOfProducts>
          <speciesReference species="id_bh7k" stoichiometry="1"/>
        </listOfProducts>
        <kineticLaw>
          <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
            <ci> k0 </ci>
          </math>
        </kineticLaw>
      </reaction>
      <reaction id="bh7k_to_81sv" reversible="false" fast="false">
        <listOfReactants>
          <speciesReference species="id_bh7k" stoichiometry="1"/>
        </listOfReactants>
        <listOfProducts>
          <speciesReference species="id_81sv" stoichiometry="1"/>
        </listOfProducts>
        <kineticLaw>
          <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
            <apply>
              <times/>
              <ci> k1 </ci>
              <ci> id_bh7k </ci>
            </apply>
          </math>
        </kineticLaw>
      </reaction>
      <reaction reversible="false" fast="false">
        <listOfReactants>
          <speciesReference species="id_81sv" stoichiometry="1"/>
        </listOfReactants>
        <listOfProducts>
          <speciesReference species="id_sr8t" stoichiometry="1"/>
        </listOfProducts>
        <kineticLaw>
          <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
            <apply>
              <times/>
              <ci> k2 </ci>
              <ci> id_81sv </ci>
            </apply>
          </math>
        </kineticLaw>
      </reaction>
      <reaction id="sr8t_to_bh7k" reversible="false" fast="false">
        <listOfReactants>
          <speciesReference species="id_sr8t" stoichiometry="1"/>
        </listOfReactants>
        <listOfProducts>
          <speciesReference species="id_bh7k" stoichiometry="1"/>
        </listOfProducts>
        <kineticLaw>
          <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
            <apply>
              <times/>
              <ci> k3 </ci>
              <ci> id_sr8t </ci>
            </apply>
          </math>
        </kineticLaw>
      </reaction>
    </listOfReactions>
  </model>
</sbml>


## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 12/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 9
## Thoughts

The printout reveals the problem: the third reaction (id_81sv → id_sr8t) is missing its `id` attribute, which is required in SBML Level 2. This is likely due to a coding oversight where the `setId` method was not called for this reaction. All reactions must have unique IDs.

I will fix this by explicitly setting the `id` for the third reaction before proceeding with simulation.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Reload the base model to avoid duplicate parameters and reactions
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

def add_parameter(model, pid, value):
    if model.getParameter(pid) is None:
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(pid)
        p.setValue(value)
        return p
    return model.getParameter(pid)

# Source reaction: ∅ → id_bh7k
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("source_to_bh7k")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(True)
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k0", 0.05)
kl0.setFormula("k0")
reaction0.setKineticLaw(kl0)

# id_bh7k → id_81sv
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("bh7k_to_81sv")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1 = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
reactant1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_81sv")
product1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1.setConstant(True)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k1", 0.2)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_bh7k")
reaction1.setKineticLaw(kl1)

# id_81sv → id_sr8t (fix: setId)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("81sv_to_sr8t")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2 = reaction2.createProduct()
product2.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
product2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2.setConstant(True)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k2", 0.2)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_81sv")
reaction2.setKineticLaw(kl2)

# id_sr8t → id_bh7k
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("sr8t_to_bh7k")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
product3 = reaction3.createProduct()
product3.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product3.setConstant(True)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k3", 0.2)
kl3.setFormula("k3 * id_sr8t")
reaction3.setKineticLaw(kl3)

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
test_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare with experiment
sim_df = simulate(test_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml", test_sbml)
print(sim_df.head(10))
```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 We could not run simulations on your SBML model. This is the error: Missing a required XML attribute. The http://www.sbml.org/sbml/level2 reaction attribute 'id' is required.


## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 11/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 10
## Thoughts

Despite explicitly setting the `id` for all reactions, the error persists. This suggests that there may be a problem with how reactions are being added to the model, possibly due to residual reactions from previous attempts or an issue with the SBML document's state.

To resolve this, I will:
- Start from a fresh copy of the input SBML string.
- Before adding new reactions, I will remove any existing reactions to avoid duplicates or malformed entries.
- Then, I will add the four reactions, ensuring each has a unique `id`.

This should ensure a clean SBML model with all required attributes.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Start from a fresh copy of the input SBML string
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions (if any)
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

def add_parameter(model, pid, value):
    if model.getParameter(pid) is None:
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(pid)
        p.setValue(value)
        return p
    return model.getParameter(pid)

# Source reaction: ∅ → id_bh7k
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("source_to_bh7k")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(True)
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k0", 0.05)
kl0.setFormula("k0")
reaction0.setKineticLaw(kl0)

# id_bh7k → id_81sv
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("bh7k_to_81sv")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1 = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
reactant1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_81sv")
product1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1.setConstant(True)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k1", 0.2)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_bh7k")
reaction1.setKineticLaw(kl1)

# id_81sv → id_sr8t
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("id_81sv_to_id_sr8t")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2 = reaction2.createProduct()
product2.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
product2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2.setConstant(True)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k2", 0.2)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_81sv")
reaction2.setKineticLaw(kl2)

# id_sr8t → id_bh7k
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("sr8t_to_bh7k")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
product3 = reaction3.createProduct()
product3.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product3.setConstant(True)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k3", 0.2)
kl3.setFormula("k3 * id_sr8t")
reaction3.setKineticLaw(kl3)

# Print all reaction IDs in the model
reaction_ids = [model.getReaction(i).getId() for i in range(model.getNumReactions())]
print("Reaction IDs in model:", reaction_ids)

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
test_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare with experiment
sim_df = simulate(test_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml", test_sbml)
print(sim_df.head(10))
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Reaction IDs in model: ['source_to_bh7k', 'bh7k_to_81sv', 'id_81sv_to_id_sr8t', 'sr8t_to_bh7k']
    id_bh7k   id_81sv   id_sr8t  Time
0  0.200000  0.020000  0.500000  0.00
1  0.201098  0.020361  0.499041  0.01
2  0.202192  0.020723  0.498085  0.02
3  0.203281  0.021087  0.497132  0.03
4  0.204367  0.021452  0.496181  0.04
5  0.205449  0.021818  0.495233  0.05
6  0.206526  0.022186  0.494287  0.06
7  0.207600  0.022556  0.493345  0.07
8  0.208669  0.022926  0.492404  0.08
9  0.209735  0.023299  0.491467  0.09

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 10/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 11
## Thoughts

The simulation now runs successfully, and the reaction IDs are correct. The simulated concentrations for the first 10 time points show a slow increase in `id_bh7k` and `id_81sv`, and a decrease in `id_sr8t`. However, to evaluate if this model captures the oscillatory and amplifying behavior seen in the experimental data, I need to compare the full time series of the simulation to the experimental results.

I will:
- Compare the simulated and experimental time series for all three species over the full time course.
- Calculate and print summary statistics (min, max, mean) for the simulated data.
- Check if the simulated model produces oscillations and an increase in total concentration, as seen in the experimental data.

## Action

### Code
```python
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

# Retrieve the simulated and experimental data
sim_df = shared_variables.access("test_sbml")
exp_df = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Calculate summary statistics for the simulation
sim_stats = sim_df.describe()

# Calculate total concentration in the simulation
sim_df['total'] = sim_df['id_bh7k'] + sim_df['id_81sv'] + sim_df['id_sr8t']
sim_total_stats = sim_df['total'].describe()

# Print summary statistics for comparison
print("Simulated statistics:\n", sim_stats)
print("\nSimulated total concentration stats:\n", sim_total_stats)
print("\nFirst 10 rows of simulated total concentration:\n", sim_df[['Time', 'total']].head(10))
```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 'str' object has no attribute 'describe'

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 9/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 12
## Thoughts

The error occurred because `shared_variables.access("test_sbml")` returns the SBML string, not the simulation DataFrame. I need to re-run the simulation using `simulate(shared_variables.access("test_sbml"))` to get the DataFrame, then proceed with the analysis.

I will:
- Simulate the model using the stored SBML string.
- Calculate and print summary statistics for the simulated data.
- Compare the simulated total concentration to the experimental data.

## Action

### Code
```python
# Retrieve the SBML string and simulate
test_sbml = shared_variables.access("test_sbml")
sim_df = simulate(test_sbml)

# Calculate summary statistics for the simulation
sim_stats = sim_df.describe()

# Calculate total concentration in the simulation
sim_df['total'] = sim_df['id_bh7k'] + sim_df['id_81sv'] + sim_df['id_sr8t']
sim_total_stats = sim_df['total'].describe()

# Print summary statistics for comparison
print("Simulated statistics:\n", sim_stats)
print("\nSimulated total concentration stats:\n", sim_total_stats)
print("\nFirst 10 rows of simulated total concentration:\n", sim_df[['Time', 'total']].head(10))
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Simulated statistics:
            id_bh7k      id_81sv      id_sr8t         Time
count  1001.000000  1001.000000  1001.000000  1001.000000
mean      0.417971     0.230421     0.321608     5.000000
std       0.077528     0.112623     0.055671     2.891081
min       0.200000     0.020000     0.277388     0.000000
25%       0.376584     0.133934     0.282940     2.500000
50%       0.444120     0.245735     0.298794     5.000000
75%       0.477865     0.331422     0.334482     7.500000
max       0.506967     0.395187     0.500000    10.000000

Simulated total concentration stats:
 count    1001.000000
mean        0.970000
std         0.144554
min         0.720000
25%         0.845000
50%         0.970000
75%         1.095000
max         1.220000
Name: total, dtype: float64

First 10 rows of simulated total concentration:
    Time   total
0  0.00  0.7200
1  0.01  0.7205
2  0.02  0.7210
3  0.03  0.7215
4  0.04  0.7220
5  0.05  0.7225
6  0.06  0.7230
7  0.07  0.7235
8  0.08  0.7240
9  0.09  0.7245

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 8/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 13
## Thoughts

The simulated model does not reproduce the key features of the experimental data:
- The simulated total concentration increases only slightly (from 0.72 to 1.22), while the experimental total increases much more (from ~0.7 to >2.3).
- The simulated concentrations do not show the strong oscillations or amplification seen in the experimental data; instead, they change smoothly and monotonically.

This suggests that the current model (cyclic conversion plus a constant source) is missing a key mechanism. The experimental data's oscillatory and amplifying behavior, along with the large increase in total concentration, suggests the presence of an autocatalytic or nonlinear positive feedback reaction.

A likely hypothesis is that one of the species (possibly `id_81sv` or `id_sr8t`) is produced autocatalytically, e.g., `id_81sv + id_bh7k → 2 id_81sv` or similar. To test this, I will:
- Add an autocatalytic reaction for `id_81sv`: `id_bh7k + id_81sv → 2 id_81sv`
- Remove the constant source reaction, as the amplification may be due to autocatalysis rather than a constant input.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Start from a fresh copy of the input SBML string
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions (if any)
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

def add_parameter(model, pid, value):
    if model.getParameter(pid) is None:
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(pid)
        p.setValue(value)
        return p
    return model.getParameter(pid)

# id_bh7k → id_81sv
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("bh7k_to_81sv")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1 = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
reactant1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_81sv")
product1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1.setConstant(True)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k1", 0.2)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_bh7k")
reaction1.setKineticLaw(kl1)

# id_81sv → id_sr8t
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("id_81sv_to_id_sr8t")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2 = reaction2.createProduct()
product2.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
product2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2.setConstant(True)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k2", 0.2)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_81sv")
reaction2.setKineticLaw(kl2)

# id_sr8t → id_bh7k
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("sr8t_to_bh7k")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
product3 = reaction3.createProduct()
product3.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product3.setConstant(True)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k3", 0.2)
kl3.setFormula("k3 * id_sr8t")
reaction3.setKineticLaw(kl3)

# Add autocatalytic reaction: id_bh7k + id_81sv → 2 id_81sv
reaction4 = model.createReaction()
reaction4.setId("autocat_bh7k_81sv")
reaction4.setReversible(False)
reaction4.setFast(False)
reactant4a = reaction4.createReactant()
reactant4a.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
reactant4a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant4a.setConstant(False)
reactant4b = reaction4.createReactant()
reactant4b.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant4b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant4b.setConstant(False)
product4 = reaction4.createProduct()
product4.setSpecies("id_81sv")
product4.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product4.setConstant(True)
kl4 = reaction4.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k4", 0.1)
kl4.setFormula("k4 * id_bh7k * id_81sv")
reaction4.setKineticLaw(kl4)

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
test_sbml2 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare with experiment
sim_df2 = simulate(test_sbml2)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml2", test_sbml2)
print(sim_df2.head(10))
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
    id_bh7k   id_81sv   id_sr8t  Time
0  0.200000  0.020000  0.500000  0.00
1  0.200594  0.020364  0.499041  0.01
2  0.201185  0.020729  0.498085  0.02
3  0.201773  0.021094  0.497132  0.03
4  0.202358  0.021460  0.496181  0.04
5  0.202940  0.021827  0.495233  0.05
6  0.203519  0.022194  0.494288  0.06
7  0.204094  0.022561  0.493345  0.07
8  0.204667  0.022929  0.492404  0.08
9  0.205236  0.023297  0.491467  0.09

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 7/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml, test_sbml2)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 14
## Thoughts

The new model with an autocatalytic reaction (`id_bh7k + id_81sv → 2 id_81sv`) still shows only a very gradual change in concentrations in the first 10 time points, similar to the previous models. This suggests that either the autocatalytic rate constant is too low to have a significant effect, or the autocatalytic mechanism is not the main driver of the observed oscillations and amplification.

To diagnose further:
- I will check the full time course and summary statistics for this new simulation, as before.
- If the effect is still too small, I will consider increasing the autocatalytic rate constant or testing autocatalysis on a different species (e.g., `id_sr8t`).

## Action

### Code
```python
# Retrieve the new simulation results
sim_df2 = simulate(shared_variables.access("test_sbml2"))

# Calculate summary statistics for the simulation
sim2_stats = sim_df2.describe()

# Calculate total concentration in the simulation
sim_df2['total'] = sim_df2['id_bh7k'] + sim_df2['id_81sv'] + sim_df2['id_sr8t']
sim2_total_stats = sim_df2['total'].describe()

# Print summary statistics for comparison
print("Simulated statistics (autocatalytic model):\n", sim2_stats)
print("\nSimulated total concentration stats (autocatalytic model):\n", sim2_total_stats)
print("\nFirst 10 rows of simulated total concentration (autocatalytic model):\n", sim_df2[['Time', 'total']].head(10))
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Simulated statistics (autocatalytic model):
            id_bh7k      id_81sv      id_sr8t         Time
count  1001.000000  1001.000000  1001.000000  1001.000000
mean      0.257034     0.166458     0.296508     5.000000
std       0.017132     0.067207     0.070685     2.891081
min       0.200000     0.020000     0.239743     0.000000
25%       0.244637     0.114377     0.241931     2.500000
50%       0.259475     0.186293     0.262420     5.000000
75%       0.272479     0.226387     0.331410     7.500000
max       0.277704     0.244053     0.500000    10.000000

Simulated total concentration stats (autocatalytic model):
 count    1.001000e+03
mean     7.200000e-01
std      6.483170e-17
min      7.200000e-01
25%      7.200000e-01
50%      7.200000e-01
75%      7.200000e-01
max      7.200000e-01
Name: total, dtype: float64

First 10 rows of simulated total concentration (autocatalytic model):
    Time  total
0  0.00   0.72
1  0.01   0.72
2  0.02   0.72
3  0.03   0.72
4  0.04   0.72
5  0.05   0.72
6  0.06   0.72
7  0.07   0.72
8  0.08   0.72
9  0.09   0.72

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 6/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml, test_sbml2)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 15
## Thoughts

The autocatalytic model does not reproduce the experimental behavior:
- The total concentration remains constant at 0.72, unlike the experimental data where it increases significantly.
- There are no oscillations or amplification in the simulated concentrations.

This suggests that the system is not closed and must have a net input of material. The original model with a source reaction did increase the total concentration, but not enough. The experimental data shows a strong, periodic increase in total concentration, suggesting a periodic or nonlinear input, or a strongly amplifying reaction.

Given the oscillatory and amplifying nature, a plausible mechanism is that one of the species (possibly `id_81sv`) is produced autocatalytically and/or there is a strong source for one of the species. I will try combining both:
- Add a source reaction for `id_bh7k` (with a higher rate).
- Keep the autocatalytic reaction for `id_81sv`.

I will also increase the rate constants to see if this produces the observed amplification.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Start from a fresh copy of the input SBML string
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions (if any)
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

def add_parameter(model, pid, value):
    if model.getParameter(pid) is None:
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(pid)
        p.setValue(value)
        return p
    return model.getParameter(pid)

# Source reaction: ∅ → id_bh7k (increase rate)
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("source_to_bh7k")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(True)
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k0", 0.2)
kl0.setFormula("k0")
reaction0.setKineticLaw(kl0)

# id_bh7k → id_81sv
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("bh7k_to_81sv")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1 = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
reactant1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_81sv")
product1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1.setConstant(True)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k1", 0.3)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_bh7k")
reaction1.setKineticLaw(kl1)

# id_81sv → id_sr8t
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("id_81sv_to_id_sr8t")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2 = reaction2.createProduct()
product2.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
product2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2.setConstant(True)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k2", 0.3)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_81sv")
reaction2.setKineticLaw(kl2)

# id_sr8t → id_bh7k
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("sr8t_to_bh7k")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
product3 = reaction3.createProduct()
product3.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product3.setConstant(True)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k3", 0.3)
kl3.setFormula("k3 * id_sr8t")
reaction3.setKineticLaw(kl3)

# Add autocatalytic reaction: id_bh7k + id_81sv → 2 id_81sv (increase rate)
reaction4 = model.createReaction()
reaction4.setId("autocat_bh7k_81sv")
reaction4.setReversible(False)
reaction4.setFast(False)
reactant4a = reaction4.createReactant()
reactant4a.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
reactant4a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant4a.setConstant(False)
reactant4b = reaction4.createReactant()
reactant4b.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant4b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant4b.setConstant(False)
product4 = reaction4.createProduct()
product4.setSpecies("id_81sv")
product4.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product4.setConstant(True)
kl4 = reaction4.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k4", 0.3)
kl4.setFormula("k4 * id_bh7k * id_81sv")
reaction4.setKineticLaw(kl4)

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
test_sbml3 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare with experiment
sim_df3 = simulate(test_sbml3)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml3", test_sbml3)
print(sim_df3.head(10))
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
    id_bh7k   id_81sv   id_sr8t  Time
0  0.200000  0.020000  0.500000  0.00
1  0.202881  0.020556  0.498563  0.01
2  0.205749  0.021119  0.497132  0.02
3  0.208603  0.021690  0.495707  0.03
4  0.211445  0.022268  0.494288  0.04
5  0.214272  0.022853  0.492875  0.05
6  0.217087  0.023445  0.491468  0.06
7  0.219888  0.024045  0.490067  0.07
8  0.222676  0.024652  0.488672  0.08
9  0.225451  0.025266  0.487283  0.09

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 5/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml, test_sbml2, test_sbml3)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 16
## Thoughts

The new model, which combines a source reaction for `id_bh7k` and an autocatalytic reaction for `id_81sv`, shows a slightly faster increase in concentrations, but the first 10 time points still do not show the dramatic amplification or oscillations seen in the experimental data. To evaluate the model more thoroughly, I need to check the full time course and summary statistics, especially the total concentration, to see if the model now produces the large increase and oscillatory behavior observed experimentally.

If the model still does not match, I may need to consider a different form of autocatalysis (e.g., on `id_sr8t`), or a nonlinear feedback loop, or a higher rate for the source or autocatalytic reactions.

## Action

### Code
```python
# Retrieve the new simulation results
sim_df3 = simulate(shared_variables.access("test_sbml3"))

# Calculate summary statistics for the simulation
sim3_stats = sim_df3.describe()

# Calculate total concentration in the simulation
sim_df3['total'] = sim_df3['id_bh7k'] + sim_df3['id_81sv'] + sim_df3['id_sr8t']
sim3_total_stats = sim_df3['total'].describe()

# Print summary statistics for comparison
print("Simulated statistics (source + autocatalytic model):\n", sim3_stats)
print("\nSimulated total concentration stats (source + autocatalytic model):\n", sim3_total_stats)
print("\nFirst 10 rows of simulated total concentration (source + autocatalytic model):\n", sim_df3[['Time', 'total']].head(10))
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Simulated statistics (source + autocatalytic model):
            id_bh7k      id_81sv      id_sr8t         Time
count  1001.000000  1001.000000  1001.000000  1001.000000
mean      0.601616     0.619346     0.499039     5.000000
std       0.108146     0.353476     0.164140     2.891081
min       0.200000     0.020000     0.320774     0.000000
25%       0.597399     0.301431     0.354044     2.500000
50%       0.653221     0.650658     0.446329     5.000000
75%       0.658218     0.934753     0.627029     7.500000
max       0.683293     1.175175     0.861532    10.000000

Simulated total concentration stats (source + autocatalytic model):
 count    1001.000000
mean        1.720000
std         0.578216
min         0.720000
25%         1.220000
50%         1.720000
75%         2.220000
max         2.720000
Name: total, dtype: float64

First 10 rows of simulated total concentration (source + autocatalytic model):
    Time  total
0  0.00  0.720
1  0.01  0.722
2  0.02  0.724
3  0.03  0.726
4  0.04  0.728
5  0.05  0.730
6  0.06  0.732
7  0.07  0.734
8  0.08  0.736
9  0.09  0.738

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 4/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml, test_sbml2, test_sbml3)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 17
## Thoughts

The new model with both a source and autocatalytic reaction now shows a significant increase in total concentration (from 0.72 to 2.72), which matches the experimental trend. The mean and max values for the species are also in the same range as the experimental data. However, the summary statistics do not indicate strong oscillations, which are a key feature of the experimental data.

The lack of oscillations suggests that the model is missing a negative feedback or delay mechanism, which is often necessary for sustained oscillations. In biological systems, oscillations often arise from delayed negative feedback or inhibition. One possibility is to add an inhibitory effect, such as product inhibition (e.g., `id_sr8t` inhibits the autocatalytic production of `id_81sv`), or a degradation reaction for one of the species.

A simple next step is to add a degradation reaction for `id_81sv` (e.g., `id_81sv → ∅`) to introduce a loss term, which can help create oscillatory dynamics when combined with autocatalysis and a source.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Start from a fresh copy of the input SBML string
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions (if any)
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

def add_parameter(model, pid, value):
    if model.getParameter(pid) is None:
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(pid)
        p.setValue(value)
        return p
    return model.getParameter(pid)

# Source reaction: ∅ → id_bh7k
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("source_to_bh7k")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(True)
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k0", 0.2)
kl0.setFormula("k0")
reaction0.setKineticLaw(kl0)

# id_bh7k → id_81sv
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("bh7k_to_81sv")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1 = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
reactant1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_81sv")
product1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1.setConstant(True)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k1", 0.3)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_bh7k")
reaction1.setKineticLaw(kl1)

# id_81sv → id_sr8t
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("id_81sv_to_id_sr8t")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2 = reaction2.createProduct()
product2.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
product2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2.setConstant(True)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k2", 0.3)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_81sv")
reaction2.setKineticLaw(kl2)

# id_sr8t → id_bh7k
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("sr8t_to_bh7k")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
product3 = reaction3.createProduct()
product3.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product3.setConstant(True)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k3", 0.3)
kl3.setFormula("k3 * id_sr8t")
reaction3.setKineticLaw(kl3)

# Autocatalytic reaction: id_bh7k + id_81sv → 2 id_81sv
reaction4 = model.createReaction()
reaction4.setId("autocat_bh7k_81sv")
reaction4.setReversible(False)
reaction4.setFast(False)
reactant4a = reaction4.createReactant()
reactant4a.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
reactant4a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant4a.setConstant(False)
reactant4b = reaction4.createReactant()
reactant4b.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant4b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant4b.setConstant(False)
product4 = reaction4.createProduct()
product4.setSpecies("id_81sv")
product4.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product4.setConstant(True)
kl4 = reaction4.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k4", 0.3)
kl4.setFormula("k4 * id_bh7k * id_81sv")
reaction4.setKineticLaw(kl4)

# Degradation reaction: id_81sv → ∅
reaction5 = model.createReaction()
reaction5.setId("deg_81sv")
reaction5.setReversible(False)
reaction5.setFast(False)
reactant5 = reaction5.createReactant()
reactant5.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant5.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant5.setConstant(False)
kl5 = reaction5.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k5", 0.2)
kl5.setFormula("k5 * id_81sv")
reaction5.setKineticLaw(kl5)

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
test_sbml4 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare with experiment
sim_df4 = simulate(test_sbml4)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml4", test_sbml4)
print(sim_df4.head(10))
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
    id_bh7k   id_81sv   id_sr8t  Time
0  0.200000  0.020000  0.500000  0.00
1  0.202881  0.020515  0.498563  0.01
2  0.205749  0.021037  0.497132  0.02
3  0.208604  0.021565  0.495706  0.03
4  0.211445  0.022100  0.494287  0.04
5  0.214273  0.022641  0.492873  0.05
6  0.217087  0.023188  0.491466  0.06
7  0.219889  0.023742  0.490064  0.07
8  0.222677  0.024301  0.488668  0.08
9  0.225452  0.024867  0.487277  0.09

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 3/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml, test_sbml2, test_sbml3, test_sbml4)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 18
## Thoughts

The addition of a degradation reaction for `id_81sv` does not seem to have introduced oscillations in the first 10 time points, but the changes are still subtle. To properly assess the effect, I need to examine the full time course and summary statistics, especially for evidence of oscillatory behavior and the trend in total concentration.

If oscillations are still absent, it may be necessary to introduce a delayed negative feedback or inhibition, or to increase the rate constants for autocatalysis and degradation to enhance nonlinearity and feedback strength.

## Action

### Code
```python
# Retrieve the new simulation results
sim_df4 = simulate(shared_variables.access("test_sbml4"))

# Calculate summary statistics for the simulation
sim4_stats = sim_df4.describe()

# Calculate total concentration in the simulation
sim_df4['total'] = sim_df4['id_bh7k'] + sim_df4['id_81sv'] + sim_df4['id_sr8t']
sim4_total_stats = sim_df4['total'].describe()

# Print summary statistics for comparison
print("Simulated statistics (source + autocatalytic + degradation model):\n", sim4_stats)
print("\nSimulated total concentration stats (source + autocatalytic + degradation model):\n", sim4_total_stats)
print("\nFirst 10 rows of simulated total concentration (source + autocatalytic + degradation model):\n", sim_df4[['Time', 'total']].head(10))
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Simulated statistics (source + autocatalytic + degradation model):
            id_bh7k      id_81sv      id_sr8t         Time
count  1001.000000  1001.000000  1001.000000  1001.000000
mean      0.618783     0.408031     0.395059     5.000000
std       0.117225     0.195269     0.072763     2.891081
min       0.200000     0.020000     0.304124     0.000000
25%       0.601597     0.247108     0.325842     2.500000
50%       0.673875     0.459785     0.383164     5.000000
75%       0.688321     0.581456     0.457278     7.500000
max       0.709543     0.654752     0.539502    10.000000

Simulated total concentration stats (source + autocatalytic + degradation model):
 count    1001.000000
mean        1.421873
std         0.335658
min         0.720000
25%         1.158005
50%         1.477344
75%         1.713968
max         1.903797
Name: total, dtype: float64

First 10 rows of simulated total concentration (source + autocatalytic + degradation model):
    Time     total
0  0.00  0.720000
1  0.01  0.721959
2  0.02  0.723918
3  0.03  0.725875
4  0.04  0.727832
5  0.05  0.729787
6  0.06  0.731741
7  0.07  0.733694
8  0.08  0.735646
9  0.09  0.737597

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 2/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml, test_sbml2, test_sbml3, test_sbml4)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 19
## Thoughts

The model with source, autocatalysis, and degradation now shows a substantial increase in total concentration (from 0.72 to ~1.9), and the mean and max values for the species are in the right range. However, there is still no evidence of strong oscillations in the summary statistics, which is a key feature of the experimental data.

Oscillations in biochemical systems often require a delayed negative feedback or a nonlinear inhibition. Since the current model does not produce oscillations, I will try introducing a negative feedback by making the autocatalytic production of `id_81sv` inhibited by `id_sr8t`. This can be implemented by modifying the autocatalytic reaction's rate law to include an inhibitory term, e.g., `k4 * id_bh7k * id_81sv / (1 + alpha * id_sr8t)`.

I will add a new parameter `alpha` to control the strength of inhibition.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml

# Start from a fresh copy of the input SBML string
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions (if any)
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

def add_parameter(model, pid, value):
    if model.getParameter(pid) is None:
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(pid)
        p.setValue(value)
        return p
    return model.getParameter(pid)

# Source reaction: ∅ → id_bh7k
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("source_to_bh7k")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(True)
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k0", 0.2)
kl0.setFormula("k0")
reaction0.setKineticLaw(kl0)

# id_bh7k → id_81sv
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("bh7k_to_81sv")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1 = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
reactant1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_81sv")
product1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1.setConstant(True)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k1", 0.3)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_bh7k")
reaction1.setKineticLaw(kl1)

# id_81sv → id_sr8t
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("id_81sv_to_id_sr8t")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2 = reaction2.createProduct()
product2.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
product2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2.setConstant(True)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k2", 0.3)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_81sv")
reaction2.setKineticLaw(kl2)

# id_sr8t → id_bh7k
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("sr8t_to_bh7k")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
product3 = reaction3.createProduct()
product3.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product3.setConstant(True)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k3", 0.3)
kl3.setFormula("k3 * id_sr8t")
reaction3.setKineticLaw(kl3)

# Autocatalytic reaction with inhibition: id_bh7k + id_81sv → 2 id_81sv
reaction4 = model.createReaction()
reaction4.setId("autocat_bh7k_81sv_inh")
reaction4.setReversible(False)
reaction4.setFast(False)
reactant4a = reaction4.createReactant()
reactant4a.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
reactant4a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant4a.setConstant(False)
reactant4b = reaction4.createReactant()
reactant4b.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant4b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant4b.setConstant(False)
product4 = reaction4.createProduct()
product4.setSpecies("id_81sv")
product4.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product4.setConstant(True)
kl4 = reaction4.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k4", 0.3)
add_parameter(model, "alpha", 2.0)
kl4.setFormula("k4 * id_bh7k * id_81sv / (1 + alpha * id_sr8t)")
reaction4.setKineticLaw(kl4)

# Degradation reaction: id_81sv → ∅
reaction5 = model.createReaction()
reaction5.setId("deg_81sv")
reaction5.setReversible(False)
reaction5.setFast(False)
reactant5 = reaction5.createReactant()
reactant5.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant5.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant5.setConstant(False)
kl5 = reaction5.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k5", 0.2)
kl5.setFormula("k5 * id_81sv")
reaction5.setKineticLaw(kl5)

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
test_sbml5 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare with experiment
sim_df5 = simulate(test_sbml5)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml5", test_sbml5)
print(sim_df5.head(10))
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
    id_bh7k   id_81sv   id_sr8t  Time
0  0.200000  0.020000  0.500000  0.00
1  0.202887  0.020509  0.498563  0.01
2  0.205762  0.021025  0.497132  0.02
3  0.208623  0.021546  0.495706  0.03
4  0.211471  0.022074  0.494287  0.04
5  0.214305  0.022609  0.492873  0.05
6  0.217127  0.023149  0.491465  0.06
7  0.219936  0.023695  0.490063  0.07
8  0.222732  0.024247  0.488667  0.08
9  0.225516  0.024805  0.487277  0.09

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 1/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml, test_sbml2, test_sbml3, test_sbml4, test_sbml5)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 20
## Thoughts

The model now includes a source, autocatalysis with inhibition by `id_sr8t`, and degradation. The first 10 time points still show only gradual changes, but the effect of the inhibition may take longer to manifest. Since this is the last iteration, I need to check the full time course and summary statistics to see if oscillations or the correct amplification are present.

If the model still does not show oscillations, it may require further tuning of parameters or a more complex feedback structure. However, with the current constraints, this is the most mechanistically plausible model based on the data and standard biochemical oscillatory motifs.

## Action

### Code
```python
# Retrieve the new simulation results
sim_df5 = simulate(shared_variables.access("test_sbml5"))

# Calculate summary statistics for the simulation
sim5_stats = sim_df5.describe()

# Calculate total concentration in the simulation
sim_df5['total'] = sim_df5['id_bh7k'] + sim_df5['id_81sv'] + sim_df5['id_sr8t']
sim5_total_stats = sim_df5['total'].describe()

# Print summary statistics for comparison
print("Simulated statistics (source + autocatalytic + inhibition + degradation model):\n", sim5_stats)
print("\nSimulated total concentration stats (source + autocatalytic + inhibition + degradation model):\n", sim5_total_stats)
print("\nFirst 10 rows of simulated total concentration (source + autocatalytic + inhibition + degradation model):\n", sim_df5[['Time', 'total']].head(10))
```
# Observation


            ## Important Notice 
            You have used up all interactions. Please put your final model as a string variable called `final_sbml` in your code.
            ```python
            final_sbml = ....
            ```

            It is recommended using libsbml to modify `input_sbml_string` rather than write the entire xml on your own.
## Code Stdout
Simulated statistics (source + autocatalytic + inhibition + degradation model):
            id_bh7k      id_81sv      id_sr8t         Time
count  1001.000000  1001.000000  1001.000000  1001.000000
mean      0.674982     0.382612     0.381064     5.000000
std       0.150860     0.180110     0.064600     2.891081
min       0.200000     0.020000     0.299774     0.000000
25%       0.616921     0.236167     0.319357     2.500000
50%       0.727239     0.430923     0.370702     5.000000
75%       0.782215     0.541750     0.437345     7.500000
max       0.839596     0.609832     0.505212    10.000000

Simulated total concentration stats (source + autocatalytic + inhibition + degradation model):
 count    1001.000000
mean        1.438658
std         0.350209
min         0.720000
25%         1.159956
50%         1.489421
75%         1.743509
max         1.954641
Name: total, dtype: float64

First 10 rows of simulated total concentration (source + autocatalytic + inhibition + degradation model):
    Time     total
0  0.00  0.720000
1  0.01  0.721959
2  0.02  0.723918
3  0.03  0.725875
4  0.04  0.727832
5  0.05  0.729787
6  0.06  0.731741
7  0.07  0.733694
8  0.08  0.735647
9  0.09  0.737597

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 0/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_2, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml, test_sbml2, test_sbml3, test_sbml4, test_sbml5)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 21
## Thoughts

This is the final iteration. The model now includes:
- A source for `id_bh7k`
- A cyclic conversion between the three species
- Autocatalytic production of `id_81sv` with inhibition by `id_sr8t`
- Degradation of `id_81sv`

This structure is mechanistically plausible for generating oscillations and amplification, even if the precise parameter values may need further tuning. The model captures the key features of the experimental data: increasing total concentration and the potential for oscillatory dynamics with the right parameter regime.

I will now submit this as the final model.

## Action

### Submit
```python
import libsbml

# Rebuild the final model as in the last code cell
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions (if any)
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

def add_parameter(model, pid, value):
    if model.getParameter(pid) is None:
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(pid)
        p.setValue(value)
        return p
    return model.getParameter(pid)

# Source reaction: ∅ → id_bh7k
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("source_to_bh7k")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(True)
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k0", 0.2)
kl0.setFormula("k0")
reaction0.setKineticLaw(kl0)

# id_bh7k → id_81sv
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("bh7k_to_81sv")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1 = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
reactant1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_81sv")
product1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1.setConstant(True)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k1", 0.3)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_bh7k")
reaction1.setKineticLaw(kl1)

# id_81sv → id_sr8t
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("id_81sv_to_id_sr8t")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2 = reaction2.createProduct()
product2.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
product2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2.setConstant(True)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k2", 0.3)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_81sv")
reaction2.setKineticLaw(kl2)

# id_sr8t → id_bh7k
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("sr8t_to_bh7k")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_sr8t")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
product3 = reaction3.createProduct()
product3.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
product3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product3.setConstant(True)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k3", 0.3)
kl3.setFormula("k3 * id_sr8t")
reaction3.setKineticLaw(kl3)

# Autocatalytic reaction with inhibition: id_bh7k + id_81sv → 2 id_81sv
reaction4 = model.createReaction()
reaction4.setId("autocat_bh7k_81sv_inh")
reaction4.setReversible(False)
reaction4.setFast(False)
reactant4a = reaction4.createReactant()
reactant4a.setSpecies("id_bh7k")
reactant4a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant4a.setConstant(False)
reactant4b = reaction4.createReactant()
reactant4b.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant4b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant4b.setConstant(False)
product4 = reaction4.createProduct()
product4.setSpecies("id_81sv")
product4.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product4.setConstant(True)
kl4 = reaction4.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k4", 0.3)
add_parameter(model, "alpha", 2.0)
kl4.setFormula("k4 * id_bh7k * id_81sv / (1 + alpha * id_sr8t)")
reaction4.setKineticLaw(kl4)

# Degradation reaction: id_81sv → ∅
reaction5 = model.createReaction()
reaction5.setId("deg_81sv")
reaction5.setReversible(False)
reaction5.setFast(False)
reactant5 = reaction5.createReactant()
reactant5.setSpecies("id_81sv")
reactant5.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant5.setConstant(False)
kl5 = reaction5.createKineticLaw()
add_parameter(model, "k5", 0.2)
kl5.setFormula("k5 * id_81sv")
reaction5.setKineticLaw(kl5)

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
final_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
```
