
                # Interation 0

                ## Task Info
                You are investigating a biological system where all species are observable. Your goal is to discover the missing reactions. You do not need to add new species.


                ## Incomplete SBML Model. You can assess it as input_sbml_string.

                <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<sbml xmlns="http://www.sbml.org/sbml/level2" level="2" version="1">
  <model id="id_7s7l">
    <listOfUnitDefinitions>
      <unitDefinition id="id_umvk">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="item"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
      <unitDefinition id="id_29sf">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="second" multiplier="3600"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
    </listOfUnitDefinitions>
    <listOfCompartments>
      <compartment id="id_phg3" size="1"/>
    </listOfCompartments>
    <listOfSpecies>
      <species id="id_5mud" compartment="id_phg3" initialConcentration="0"/>
      <species id="id_cue9" compartment="id_phg3" initialConcentration="0"/>
      <species id="id_6m7j" compartment="id_phg3" initialConcentration="0"/>
    </listOfSpecies>
  </model>
</sbml>


                ## Max iterations
                20

                Format your response according to the instructions in the system message.
                
## Thoughts
The initial SBML model contains three species (`id_5mud`, `id_cue9`, `id_6m7j`) but no reactions. All initial concentrations are set to 0. To understand the system's behavior and identify missing reactions, the first step is to observe the system under these default conditions. This will tell me if any species are produced from boundary conditions or if the system requires non-zero initial concentrations to show any dynamics.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
    "action": "observe",
    "meta_data": {}
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_0
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_0]

Total size: 1001 rows × 4 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_0] for the full data

Time   id_5mud  id_cue9  id_6m7j
0         0        0        0
...
3.60e-01  9.17e-05 7.68e-03 1.08e-01
...
7.20e-01  7.20e-04 3.04e-02 2.16e-01
...
1.08e+00  2.39e-03 6.75e-02 3.23e-01
...
1.44e+00  5.56e-03 1.18e-01 4.30e-01
...
1.80e+00  1.06e-02 1.82e-01 5.33e-01
...
2.16e+00  1.80e-02 2.59e-01 6.32e-01
...
2.52e+00  2.81e-02 3.45e-01 7.22e-01
...
2.88e+00  4.10e-02 4.41e-01 8.00e-01
...
3.24e+00  5.69e-02 5.43e-01 8.61e-01
...
3.60e+00  7.60e-02 6.49e-01 9.02e-01
...
3.96e+00  9.81e-02 7.55e-01 9.18e-01
...
4.32e+00  1.23e-01 8.58e-01 9.10e-01
...
4.68e+00  1.51e-01 9.54e-01 8.77e-01
...
5.04e+00  1.81e-01 1.04e+00 8.23e-01
...
5.40e+00  2.13e-01 1.12e+00 7.52e-01
...
5.76e+00  2.46e-01 1.18e+00 6.72e-01
...
6.12e+00  2.79e-01 1.22e+00 5.90e-01
...
6.48e+00  3.14e-01 1.26e+00 5.10e-01
...
6.84e+00  3.47e-01 1.28e+00 4.38e-01
...
7.20e+00  3.81e-01 1.29e+00 3.76e-01
...
7.56e+00  4.13e-01 1.30e+00 3.24e-01
...
7.92e+00  4.44e-01 1.29e+00 2.83e-01
...
8.28e+00  4.74e-01 1.29e+00 2.50e-01
...
8.64e+00  5.03e-01 1.27e+00 2.25e-01
...
9.00e+00  5.30e-01 1.26e+00 2.05e-01
...
9.36e+00  5.55e-01 1.24e+00 1.90e-01
...
9.72e+00  5.79e-01 1.22e+00 1.78e-01
...
1.01e+01  6.02e-01 1.21e+00 1.68e-01
...
1.04e+01  6.23e-01 1.19e+00 1.60e-01
...
1.08e+01  6.42e-01 1.17e+00 1.54e-01
...
1.12e+01  6.60e-01 1.15e+00 1.49e-01
...
1.15e+01  6.77e-01 1.13e+00 1.44e-01
...
1.19e+01  6.93e-01 1.11e+00 1.40e-01
...
1.22e+01  7.07e-01 1.09e+00 1.37e-01
...
1.26e+01  7.20e-01 1.07e+00 1.34e-01
...
1.30e+01  7.32e-01 1.05e+00 1.31e-01
...
1.33e+01  7.43e-01 1.03e+00 1.29e-01
...
1.37e+01  7.53e-01 1.01e+00 1.27e-01
...
1.40e+01  7.62e-01 9.94e-01 1.25e-01
...
1.44e+01  7.70e-01 9.76e-01 1.23e-01
...
1.48e+01  7.77e-01 9.59e-01 1.22e-01
...
1.51e+01  7.83e-01 9.42e-01 1.21e-01
...
1.55e+01  7.88e-01 9.26e-01 1.20e-01
...
1.58e+01  7.93e-01 9.10e-01 1.19e-01
...
1.62e+01  7.97e-01 8.95e-01 1.18e-01
...
1.66e+01  8.00e-01 8.80e-01 1.18e-01
...
1.69e+01  8.02e-01 8.65e-01 1.17e-01
...
1.73e+01  8.04e-01 8.51e-01 1.17e-01
...
1.80e+01  8.07e-01 8.25e-01 1.16e-01

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 20/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 1
## Thoughts
The initial observation clearly shows dynamic changes in all three species, starting from zero concentration. This indicates that there are production reactions occurring, likely from implicit boundary or constant species. The sequential peaking of `id_6m7j` then `id_cue9`, followed by the continuous increase of `id_5mud`, suggests a possible linear pathway: Source -> `id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9` -> `id_5mud` -> Sink.

Based on this hypothesis, I will modify the SBML model to include:
1.  A constant species 'Source'.
2.  A boundary species 'Sink'.
3.  A reaction producing `id_6m7j` from 'Source'.
4.  A reaction converting `id_6m7j` to `id_cue9`.
5.  A reaction converting `id_cue9` to `id_5mud`.
6.  A reaction consuming `id_5mud` into 'Sink'.

I will use simple mass action kinetics for all reactions and set initial rate constants to a small value (e.1) as placeholders. I will also set the initial concentration of 'Source' to 1.0 and 'Sink' to 0.0.

After adding these reactions, I will simulate the modified model and compare the simulation results with the experimental data from `iteration_0`. This comparison will help me evaluate if the proposed reaction network structure is plausible and guide the next steps, which would likely involve parameter fitting.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# Load the initial SBML model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add 'Source' (constant species) and 'Sink' (boundary species)
source_species = model.createSpecies()
source_species.setId("Source")
source_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
source_species.setInitialConcentration(1.0) # Assume a concentration of 1.0
source_species.setConstant(True) # Make it constant

sink_species = model.createSpecies()
sink_species.setId("Sink")
sink_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
sink_species.setInitialConcentration(0.0) # Assume a concentration of 0.0
sink_species.setBoundaryCondition(True) # Make it a boundary species

# Add parameters for rate constants (placeholder values)
k1 = model.createParameter()
k1.setId("k1")
k1.setValue(0.1)
k1.setConstant(True)

k2 = model.createParameter()
k2.setId("k2")
k2.setValue(0.1)
k2.setConstant(True)

k3 = model.createParameter()
k3.setId("k3")
k3.setValue(0.1)
k3.setConstant(True)

k4 = model.createParameter()
k4.setId("k4")
k4.setValue(0.1)
k4.setConstant(True)


# Add Reaction 1: Source -> id_6m7j
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("reaction1_Source_to_6m7j")
reaction1.setReversible(False)

reactant1 = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1.setSpecies("Source")
reactant1.setStoichiometry(1)

product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
product1.setStoichiometry(1)

kinetic_law1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law1.setFormula("k1 * Source") # Mass action kinetics

# Add Reaction 2: id_6m7j -> id_cue9
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("reaction2_6m7j_to_cue9")
reaction2.setReversible(False)

reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1)

product2 = reaction2.createProduct()
product2.setSpecies("id_cue9")
product2.setStoichiometry(1)

kinetic_law2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law2.setFormula("k2 * id_6m7j") # Mass action kinetics

# Add Reaction 3: id_cue9 -> id_5mud
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("reaction3_cue9_to_5mud")
reaction3.setReversible(False)

reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_cue9")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1)

product3 = reaction3.createProduct()
product3.setSpecies("id_5mud")
product3.setStoichiometry(1)

kinetic_law3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law3.setFormula("k3 * id_cue9") # Mass action kinetics

# Add Reaction 4: id_5mud -> Sink
reaction4 = model.createReaction()
reaction4.setId("reaction4_5mud_to_Sink")
reaction4.setReversible(False)

reactant4 = reaction4.createReactant()
reactant4.setSpecies("id_5mud")
reactant4.setStoichiometry(1)

product4 = reaction4.createProduct()
product4.setSpecies("Sink")
product4.setStoichiometry(1)

kinetic_law4 = reaction4.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law4.setFormula("k4 * id_5mud") # Mass action kinetics


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Get experimental data
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Print simulation and experimental data for comparison (subset)
print("Simulation Data (first 10 rows):")
print(sim_data.head(10))
print("\nExperimental Data (first 10 rows):")
print(exp_data.head(10))

# Store the updated SBML for future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_model", updated_sbml)
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
        id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000e+00  0.000000  0.000000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  9.723196e-10  0.000002  0.001797  0.998202   0.0  0.018
2  7.750470e-09  0.000006  0.003587  0.996406   0.0  0.036
3  2.610536e-08  0.000015  0.005371  0.994615   0.0  0.054
4  6.176519e-08  0.000026  0.007148  0.992826   0.0  0.072
5  1.204154e-07  0.000040  0.008919  0.991040   0.0  0.090
6  2.077008e-07  0.000058  0.010684  0.989258   0.0  0.108
7  3.292256e-07  0.000078  0.012442  0.987479   0.0  0.126
8  4.905528e-07  0.000102  0.014194  0.985703   0.0  0.144
9  6.972048e-07  0.000129  0.015940  0.983931   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
        id_5mud   id_cue9  id_6m7j   Time
0  0.000000e+00  0.000000   0.0000  0.000
1  1.165171e-08  0.000019   0.0054  0.018
2  9.314386e-08  0.000078   0.0108  0.036
3  3.140779e-07  0.000175   0.0162  0.054
4  7.438113e-07  0.000310   0.0216  0.072
5  1.451453e-06  0.000485   0.0270  0.090
6  2.505860e-06  0.000697   0.0324  0.108
7  3.975640e-06  0.000949   0.0378  0.126
8  5.929154e-06  0.001238   0.0432  0.144
9  8.434521e-06  0.001566   0.0486  0.162

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 19/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_model)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 2
## Thoughts
The simulation with initial placeholder parameters shows the correct qualitative behavior but poor quantitative agreement. The next step is to fit the rate constants of the proposed linear pathway model to the experimental data obtained in `iteration_0`. This will determine if the proposed structure is capable of reproducing the observed dynamics with appropriate parameters.

I will implement a parameter fitting routine using `scipy.optimize.minimize`. The objective function will calculate the sum of squared errors between the simulated species concentrations and the experimental data points across all time points and species.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import minimize

# Access the experimental data
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']
exp_times = exp_data['Time'].values
exp_species_data = exp_data[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values

# Access the current SBML model string
current_sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_model")

def update_sbml_params(sbml_string, params):
    """Updates parameter values in an SBML string."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()
    param_ids = ["k1", "k2", "k3", "k4"]
    for i, param_id in enumerate(param_ids):
        p = model.getParameter(param_id)
        if p:
            p.setValue(params[i])
        else:
            print(f"Warning: Parameter {param_id} not found.")
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    return writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

def objective_function(params, sbml_string, exp_data, exp_times):
    """Calculates the sum of squared errors between simulation and experiment."""
    try:
        # Ensure parameters are non-negative
        if any(p < 0 for p in params):
            return np.inf

        # Update the SBML model with current parameters
        updated_sbml = update_sbml_params(sbml_string, params)

        # Simulate the model
        sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

        # Interpolate simulation data to match experimental time points
        # Handle cases where simulation might fail or return unexpected data
        if sim_data is None or sim_data.empty or 'Time' not in sim_data.columns:
             print("Simulation failed or returned empty data.")
             return np.inf

        # Ensure simulation covers all experimental time points
        if sim_data['Time'].iloc[-1] < exp_times[-1]:
             print("Simulation time range is shorter than experimental data.")
             # Simple approach: penalize heavily if simulation doesn't cover the range
             return np.inf # Or interpolate up to available time and add large penalty

        # Select only the species columns that are in exp_data (excluding Time)
        species_ids = [col for col in exp_data.columns if col != 'Time']
        sim_species_data = sim_data[species_ids]

        # Interpolate simulation data to experimental time points
        # Use linear interpolation, fill NaNs if necessary (e.g., if sim_data starts later)
        interp_sim_data = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data)
        for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
             interp_sim_data[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times, sim_data['Time'], sim_data[species_id])


        # Calculate sum of squared errors
        sse = np.sum((interp_sim_data - exp_species_data)**2)

        # Add a small penalty for large parameter values to encourage simpler models, if needed
        # penalty = np.sum(np.array(params)**2) * 1e-6 # Example penalty
        # sse += penalty

        return sse

    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error during objective function evaluation: {e}")
        # Return a large value if simulation or calculation fails
        return np.inf


# Initial guess for parameters (k1, k2, k3, k4)
initial_params = [0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1]

# Parameter bounds (non-negative)
bounds = [(0, None), (0, None), (0, None), (0, None)]

# Perform optimization
print("Starting parameter fitting...")
result = minimize(objective_function, initial_params, args=(current_sbml_string, exp_data, exp_times), method='L-BFGS-B', bounds=bounds)
# Using L-BFGS-B as it respects bounds

print("Optimization finished.")
print("Result:", result)

# Get the fitted parameters
fitted_params = result.x
print("Fitted parameters (k1, k2, k3, k4):", fitted_params)

# Update the SBML model with fitted parameters
fitted_sbml_string = update_sbml_params(current_sbml_string, fitted_params)

# Simulate the model with fitted parameters
sim_data_fitted = simulate(fitted_sbml_string)

# Store the fitted SBML model
shared_variables.add("fitted_sbml_model", fitted_sbml_string)

# Print comparison (subset)
print("\nSimulation Data (fitted parameters, first 10 rows):")
print(sim_data_fitted.head(10))
print("\nExperimental Data (first 10 rows):")
print(exp_data.head(10))

# Optional: Plotting for visual comparison (requires matplotlib, not available in this environment)
# You would typically plot sim_data_fitted and exp_data to visually assess the fit.

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Starting parameter fitting...
Optimization finished.
Result:   message: CONVERGENCE: RELATIVE REDUCTION OF F <= FACTR*EPSMCH
  success: True
   status: 0
      fun: 299.7039241564239
        x: [ 9.107e-01  3.607e-01  4.005e-02  0.000e+00]
      nit: 22
      jac: [ 1.575e-03  4.547e-04  5.610e-03  8.021e+02]
     nfev: 150
     njev: 30
 hess_inv: <4x4 LbfgsInvHessProduct with dtype=float64>
Fitted parameters (k1, k2, k3, k4): [0.91065756 0.36067614 0.04005083 0.        ]

Simulation Data (fitted parameters, first 10 rows):
        id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000e+00  0.000000  0.000000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  1.271011e-08  0.000053  0.016205  0.983742   0.0  0.018
2  1.010846e-07  0.000210  0.032042  0.967748   0.0  0.036
3  3.391807e-07  0.000468  0.047518  0.952014   0.0  0.054
4  7.992893e-07  0.000825  0.062638  0.936536   0.0  0.072
5  1.551994e-06  0.001279  0.077410  0.921310   0.0  0.090
6  2.666201e-06  0.001828  0.091839  0.906331   0.0  0.108
7  4.209158e-06  0.002468  0.105932  0.891595   0.0  0.126
8  6.246495e-06  0.003199  0.119695  0.877100   0.0  0.144
9  8.842254e-06  0.004017  0.133135  0.862840   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
        id_5mud   id_cue9  id_6m7j   Time
0  0.000000e+00  0.000000   0.0000  0.000
1  1.165171e-08  0.000019   0.0054  0.018
2  9.314386e-08  0.000078   0.0108  0.036
3  3.140779e-07  0.000175   0.0162  0.054
4  7.438113e-07  0.000310   0.0216  0.072
5  1.451453e-06  0.000485   0.0270  0.090
6  2.505860e-06  0.000697   0.0324  0.108
7  3.975640e-06  0.000949   0.0378  0.126
8  5.929154e-06  0.001238   0.0432  0.144
9  8.434521e-06  0.001566   0.0486  0.162

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 18/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 3
## Thoughts
The parameter fitting successfully converged, yielding fitted rate constants: k1=0.91, k2=0.36, k3=0.04, and k4=0.0. The fact that k4 is zero suggests that the reaction consuming `id_5mud` into the 'Sink' might not exist or is negligible.

Comparing the simulated data with the experimental data (even just the head), the fit seems qualitatively better than with the initial parameters, but there are still noticeable differences, especially in the early time points and the relative concentrations of the species. The sum of squared errors (SSE) of ~300 is also quite high, indicating the model doesn't perfectly capture the dynamics.

The current model is a simple linear chain. The discrepancies could be due to:
1.  Incorrect reaction structure (e.g., missing reactions, different dependencies).
2.  Incorrect kinetic laws (e.g., not simple mass action).
3.  Reversible reactions.
4.  Other factors like initial concentrations (though the experiment started from 0 for the main species).

Given the non-zero initial concentrations in the experiment for `id_6m7j`, `id_cue9`, and `id_5mud` (even though the SBML specified 0), this suggests the 'Source' reaction is indeed active from the start. The fitted k1 (Source -> `id_6m7j`) is the highest, which aligns with `id_6m7j` appearing first and reaching the highest peak concentration. The fitted k2 (`id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9`) is lower, and k3 (`id_cue9` -> `id_5mud`) is even lower, which is consistent with the sequential appearance and lower peak concentrations of `id_cue9` and `id_5mud`. The zero k4 suggests `id_5mud` might not be consumed or is consumed by a different mechanism not captured by the simple sink reaction.

To further investigate the model structure and parameter values, I should perturb the system. Changing initial concentrations is a good way to test the model's predictive power under different starting conditions and potentially reveal non-linearities or feedback loops if the model fails to predict the perturbed behavior.

I will try changing the initial concentration of `id_6m7j`, as it's the first species in the proposed chain. This might help confirm the k1 and k2 values and the dependency of `id_cue9` production on `id_6m7j`. I will set `id_6m7j` to a non-zero value while keeping others at zero (as per the original model definition, although the experiment showed non-zero values, the model starts from 0). Let's try setting `id_6m7j` to 0.5.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
    "action": "change_initial_concentration",
    "meta_data": {
        "id_6m7j": 0.5
    }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_3
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_3]

Total size: 1001 rows × 4 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_3] for the full data

Time   id_5mud  id_cue9  id_6m7j
0         0        0 5.00e-01
...
3.60e-01  1.36e-03 7.84e-02 6.08e-01
...
7.20e-01  5.66e-03 1.69e-01 7.13e-01
...
1.08e+00  1.32e-02 2.71e-01 8.13e-01
...
1.44e+00  2.43e-02 3.83e-01 9.03e-01
...
1.80e+00  3.91e-02 5.03e-01 9.77e-01
...
2.16e+00  5.77e-02 6.27e-01 1.03e+00
...
2.52e+00  8.01e-02 7.53e-01 1.05e+00
...
2.88e+00  1.06e-01 8.75e-01 1.05e+00
...
3.24e+00  1.35e-01 9.90e-01 1.01e+00
...
3.60e+00  1.67e-01 1.09e+00 9.51e-01
...
3.96e+00  2.02e-01 1.18e+00 8.66e-01
...
4.32e+00  2.38e-01 1.26e+00 7.67e-01
...
4.68e+00  2.75e-01 1.31e+00 6.64e-01
...
5.04e+00  3.13e-01 1.36e+00 5.65e-01
...
5.40e+00  3.50e-01 1.38e+00 4.75e-01
...
5.76e+00  3.87e-01 1.39e+00 3.98e-01
...
6.12e+00  4.22e-01 1.40e+00 3.36e-01
...
6.48e+00  4.57e-01 1.39e+00 2.87e-01
...
6.84e+00  4.90e-01 1.38e+00 2.49e-01
...
7.20e+00  5.21e-01 1.36e+00 2.21e-01
...
7.56e+00  5.50e-01 1.34e+00 2.00e-01
...
7.92e+00  5.78e-01 1.32e+00 1.83e-01
...
8.28e+00  6.04e-01 1.30e+00 1.71e-01
...
8.64e+00  6.28e-01 1.28e+00 1.61e-01
...
9.00e+00  6.51e-01 1.26e+00 1.53e-01
...
9.36e+00  6.72e-01 1.23e+00 1.47e-01
...
9.72e+00  6.91e-01 1.21e+00 1.42e-01
...
1.01e+01  7.09e-01 1.19e+00 1.37e-01
...
1.04e+01  7.26e-01 1.16e+00 1.33e-01
...
1.08e+01  7.41e-01 1.14e+00 1.30e-01
...
1.12e+01  7.55e-01 1.12e+00 1.27e-01
...
1.15e+01  7.67e-01 1.10e+00 1.25e-01
...
1.19e+01  7.79e-01 1.08e+00 1.23e-01
...
1.22e+01  7.89e-01 1.06e+00 1.21e-01
...
1.26e+01  7.98e-01 1.04e+00 1.19e-01
...
1.30e+01  8.06e-01 1.02e+00 1.18e-01
...
1.33e+01  8.13e-01 9.96e-01 1.17e-01
...
1.37e+01  8.19e-01 9.77e-01 1.15e-01
...
1.40e+01  8.24e-01 9.59e-01 1.15e-01
...
1.44e+01  8.29e-01 9.41e-01 1.14e-01
...
1.48e+01  8.32e-01 9.24e-01 1.13e-01
...
1.51e+01  8.35e-01 9.07e-01 1.13e-01
...
1.55e+01  8.38e-01 8.91e-01 1.12e-01
...
1.58e+01  8.39e-01 8.76e-01 1.12e-01
...
1.62e+01  8.40e-01 8.60e-01 1.12e-01
...
1.66e+01  8.41e-01 8.46e-01 1.12e-01
...
1.69e+01  8.41e-01 8.32e-01 1.12e-01
...
1.73e+01  8.40e-01 8.18e-01 1.12e-01
...
1.80e+01  8.38e-01 7.92e-01 1.12e-01

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 17/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 4
## Thoughts
The experiment with a non-zero initial concentration of `id_6m7j` (iteration_3) provides new data to test the fitted model. I should now simulate the fitted model under the conditions of `iteration_3` and compare the simulation results with the experimental data from `iteration_3`.

If the fitted model from `iteration_0` accurately predicts the behavior in `iteration_3`, it strengthens the hypothesis of the linear pathway structure and the fitted parameters. If it doesn't, it indicates that the model structure is incomplete or incorrect, or that the parameters are not globally optimal.

I will use the `fitted_sbml_model` stored in `shared_variables` and simulate it with the initial condition `id_6m7j = 0.5`, `id_5mud = 0`, `id_cue9 = 0`. I will then compare this simulation to the experimental data from `iteration_3`.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# Access the fitted SBML model string
fitted_sbml_string = shared_variables.access("fitted_sbml_model")

# Load the fitted SBML model
doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(fitted_sbml_string)
model = doc.getModel()

# Change initial concentrations for simulation to match experiment_history['iteration_3']
# Note: The original model had initial concentrations set to 0.
# The experiment 'change_initial_concentration' overrides these for the run.
# To simulate this specific experiment, we need to modify the model's initial concentrations temporarily.

# Find species and set initial concentrations
species_ids_to_change = {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.5}

for species_id, initial_conc in species_ids_to_change.items():
    species = model.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species:
        species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)
    else:
        print(f"Warning: Species {species_id} not found in model.")

# Write the modified SBML for simulation
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sim_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

# Simulate the modified model
sim_data_perturbed = simulate(sim_sbml_string)

# Get experimental data from iteration_3
exp_data_perturbed = experiment_history['iteration_3']

# Print simulation and experimental data for comparison (subset)
print("Simulation Data (fitted model, perturbed IC, first 10 rows):")
print(sim_data_perturbed.head(10))
print("\nExperimental Data (perturbed IC, first 10 rows):")
print(exp_data_perturbed.head(10))

# Optional: Calculate SSE for this perturbed condition
# Select only the species columns that are in exp_data (excluding Time)
species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_perturbed.columns if col != 'Time']
sim_species_data = sim_data_perturbed[species_ids]
exp_species_data = exp_data_perturbed[species_ids]
exp_times = exp_data_perturbed['Time'].values

# Interpolate simulation data to experimental time points
interp_sim_data = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data)
for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
     interp_sim_data[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times, sim_data_perturbed['Time'], sim_data_perturbed[species_id])

sse_perturbed = np.sum((interp_sim_data - exp_species_data)**2)
print(f"\nSum of Squared Errors for perturbed initial condition (id_6m7j=0.5): {sse_perturbed}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Simulation Data (fitted model, perturbed IC, first 10 rows):
    id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000  0.000000  0.500000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  0.000001  0.003287  0.512970  0.983742   0.0  0.018
2  0.000005  0.006655  0.525592  0.967748   0.0  0.036
3  0.000011  0.010101  0.537874  0.952014   0.0  0.054
4  0.000019  0.013624  0.549821  0.936536   0.0  0.072
5  0.000030  0.017220  0.561440  0.921310   0.0  0.090
6  0.000044  0.020888  0.572737  0.906331   0.0  0.108
7  0.000061  0.024626  0.583718  0.891595   0.0  0.126
8  0.000080  0.028431  0.594390  0.877100   0.0  0.144
9  0.000102  0.032302  0.604757  0.862840   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (perturbed IC, first 10 rows):
    id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j   Time
0  0.000000  0.000000  0.500000  0.000
1  0.000003  0.003616  0.505400  0.018
2  0.000013  0.007265  0.510800  0.036
3  0.000029  0.010946  0.516199  0.054
4  0.000052  0.014659  0.521598  0.072
5  0.000082  0.018404  0.526996  0.090
6  0.000118  0.022181  0.532393  0.108
7  0.000161  0.025990  0.537789  0.126
8  0.000211  0.029832  0.543183  0.144
9  0.000268  0.033705  0.548575  0.162

Sum of Squared Errors for perturbed initial condition (id_6m7j=0.5): id_5mud    69.778919
id_cue9    23.774107
id_6m7j    30.450112
dtype: float64

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 16/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 5
## Thoughts
The simulation of the fitted model under the perturbed initial condition (`id_6m7j=0.5`) shows a significant discrepancy compared to the experimental data from `iteration_3`. The SSE for the perturbed condition (summing the species SSEs gives ~124) is considerably higher than the SSE obtained during fitting for the original condition (~300, but this was the total SSE across all species, so the per-species SSEs were smaller). This indicates that the current linear model structure, even with parameters fitted to the original data, does not accurately predict the system's behavior under perturbation.

Specifically, looking at the head of the data:
- `id_6m7j`: The simulation shows `id_6m7j` increasing from 0.5, while the experiment shows it increasing much slower. This suggests the production rate of `id_6m7j` might be influenced by its own concentration or other factors, or the consumption rate is higher than predicted by k2 * id_6m7j.
- `id_cue9`: The simulation shows `id_cue9` increasing faster than in the experiment. This could be related to the discrepancy in `id_6m7j` (its precursor) or an issue with the k2 parameter or the reaction `id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9`.
- `id_5mud`: The simulation shows `id_5mud` increasing slower than in the experiment. This could be related to the discrepancy in `id_cue9` (its precursor) or an issue with the k3 parameter or the reaction `id_cue9` -> `id_5mud`.

The fact that the model fails under perturbation suggests the simple linear, irreversible mass-action model is insufficient. Possible missing mechanisms include:
1.  **Reversible reactions:** The reactions might be reversible, especially the conversions between species.
2.  **Feedback loops:** There might be activation or inhibition effects between species.
3.  **Different kinetics:** The reactions might follow Michaelis-Menten or other non-mass-action kinetics.
4.  **Additional reactions:** There might be other production or consumption pathways.

Given the sequential nature observed in the original experiment, the linear chain hypothesis (Source -> `id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9` -> `id_5mud`) still seems plausible as a core structure. Let's first consider adding reversibility to the reactions between the species.

I will modify the `fitted_sbml_model` to make reactions 2 (`id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9`) and 3 (`id_cue9` -> `id_5mud`) reversible. This will introduce two new parameters (reverse rate constants k_neg2 and k_neg3). Reaction 1 (Source -> `id_6m7j`) is likely irreversible as it comes from a constant source. Reaction 4 (`id_5mud` -> Sink) had a fitted rate of 0, suggesting it might not exist or is irreversible with a very low rate; I will keep it irreversible for now but acknowledge this might need revisiting.

After modifying the model, I will need to refit all parameters (k1, k2, k3, k4, k_neg2, k_neg3) using the data from *both* `iteration_0` and `iteration_3`. Fitting to multiple experimental conditions simultaneously is crucial for finding parameters that generalize well and for validating the model structure.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import minimize

# Access the experimental data from both iterations
exp_data_0 = experiment_history['iteration_0']
exp_data_3 = experiment_history['iteration_3']

# Combine experimental data and create a list of (time, species_data, initial_conditions) tuples
# Initial conditions for iteration_0 were effectively [0, 0, 0] for id_5mud, id_cue9, id_6m7j
# Initial conditions for iteration_3 were [0, 0, 0.5] for id_5mud, id_cue9, id_6m7j
experimental_conditions = [
    (exp_data_0['Time'].values, exp_data_0[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}),
    (exp_data_3['Time'].values, exp_data_3[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.5})
]

# Load the initial SBML model structure (from iteration 1 code, before fitting)
# We need to start from the base structure with Source/Sink and reactions, but add reversibility
# Let's reconstruct the base model with reversible reactions
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add 'Source' (constant species) and 'Sink' (boundary species) if not already present
if not model.getSpecies("Source"):
    source_species = model.createSpecies()
    source_species.setId("Source")
    source_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    source_species.setInitialConcentration(1.0)
    source_species.setConstant(True)

if not model.getSpecies("Sink"):
    sink_species = model.createSpecies()
    sink_species.setId("Sink")
    sink_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    sink_species.setInitialConcentration(0.0)
    sink_species.setBoundaryCondition(True)

# Remove existing reactions if any (to avoid duplicates)
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add parameters for rate constants (k1, k2, k_neg2, k3, k_neg3, k4)
param_ids = ["k1", "k2", "k_neg2", "k3", "k_neg3", "k4"]
for param_id in param_ids:
    if not model.getParameter(param_id):
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(param_id)
        p.setValue(0.1) # Initial guess
        p.setConstant(True)

# Add Reaction 1: Source -> id_6m7j (Irreversible)
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("reaction1_Source_to_6m7j")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
r1_reactant = reaction1.createReactant()
r1_reactant.setSpecies("Source")
r1_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r1_product = reaction1.createProduct()
r1_product.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r1_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law1.setFormula("k1 * Source")

# Add Reaction 2: id_6m7j <=> id_cue9 (Reversible)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("reaction2_6m7j_to_cue9")
reaction2.setReversible(True) # Set to reversible
r2_reactant = reaction2.createReactant()
r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r2_product = reaction2.createProduct()
r2_product.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r2_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
# Mass action for reversible reaction: k_forward * Reactants - k_reverse * Products
kinetic_law2.setFormula("k2 * id_6m7j - k_neg2 * id_cue9")

# Add Reaction 3: id_cue9 <=> id_5mud (Reversible)
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("reaction3_cue9_to_5mud")
reaction3.setReversible(True) # Set to reversible
r3_reactant = reaction3.createReactant()
r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r3_product = reaction3.createProduct()
r3_product.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r3_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
# Mass action for reversible reaction: k_forward * Reactants - k_reverse * Products
kinetic_law3.setFormula("k3 * id_cue9 - k_neg3 * id_5mud")

# Add Reaction 4: id_5mud -> Sink (Irreversible, based on k4=0 fit)
reaction4 = model.createReaction()
reaction4.setId("reaction4_5mud_to_Sink")
reaction4.setReversible(False) # Keep irreversible for now
r4_reactant = reaction4.createReactant()
r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r4_product = reaction4.createProduct()
r4_product.setSpecies("Sink")
r4_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law4 = reaction4.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law4.setFormula("k4 * id_5mud")


# Get the base SBML string with reversible reactions
base_sbml_string_reversible = libsbml.SBMLWriter().writeSBMLToString(doc)

def update_sbml_params_reversible(sbml_string, params):
    """Updates parameter values in an SBML string for the reversible model."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()
    param_ids = ["k1", "k2", "k_neg2", "k3", "k_neg3", "k4"]
    for i, param_id in enumerate(param_ids):
        p = model.getParameter(param_id)
        if p:
            p.setValue(params[i])
        else:
            print(f"Warning: Parameter {param_id} not found.")
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    return writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

def simulate_with_ic(sbml_string, initial_conditions):
    """Simulates an SBML model with specified initial concentrations."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()

    # Temporarily change initial concentrations for simulation
    original_ics = {}
    for species_id, conc in initial_conditions.items():
        species = model.getSpecies(species_id)
        if species:
            original_ics[species_id] = species.getInitialConcentration()
            species.setInitialConcentration(conc)
        else:
             print(f"Warning: Species {species_id} not found for IC change.")

    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    sim_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

    sim_data = simulate(sim_sbml)

    # Restore original initial concentrations in the model object (important if reusing doc)
    # Although we are using a string copy, it's good practice.
    # For this workflow, we rebuild the string each time, so this step isn't strictly necessary
    # for the next call, but useful if we were modifying the doc object in place.
    # for species_id, conc in original_ics.items():
    #     species = model.getSpecies(species_id)
    #     if species:
    #         species.setInitialConcentration(conc)

    return sim_data


def objective_function_reversible(params, base_sbml_string, experimental_conditions):
    """Calculates the sum of squared errors for multiple experimental conditions."""
    try:
        # Ensure parameters are non-negative
        if any(p < 0 for p in params):
            return np.inf

        # Update the base SBML model with current parameters
        updated_sbml = update_sbml_params_reversible(base_sbml_string, params)

        total_sse = 0
        for exp_times, exp_species_data, initial_conditions in experimental_conditions:
            # Simulate the model with specific initial conditions
            sim_data = simulate_with_ic(updated_sbml, initial_conditions)

            if sim_data is None or sim_data.empty or 'Time' not in sim_data.columns:
                 print("Simulation failed or returned empty data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf # Penalize if any simulation fails

            # Ensure simulation covers all experimental time points
            if sim_data['Time'].iloc[-1] < exp_times[-1]:
                 print("Simulation time range is shorter than experimental data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf # Penalize if simulation doesn't cover the range

            # Select only the species columns that are in exp_species_data
            species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time'] # Use columns from one exp_data
            sim_species_data = sim_data[species_ids]

            # Interpolate simulation data to experimental time points
            interp_sim_data = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data)
            for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
                 interp_sim_data[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times, sim_data['Time'], sim_data[species_id])

            # Calculate sum of squared errors for this condition
            sse = np.sum((interp_sim_data - exp_species_data)**2)
            total_sse += sse

        return total_sse

    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error during objective function evaluation: {e}")
        return np.inf


# Initial guess for parameters (k1, k2, k_neg2, k3, k_neg3, k4)
# Use previous fitted values as a starting point, add small values for new reverse rates
initial_params_reversible = [0.91, 0.36, 0.01, 0.04, 0.01, 0.0] # k4 was 0, keep it low or 0

# Parameter bounds (non-negative)
bounds_reversible = [(0, None), (0, None), (0, None), (0, None), (0, None), (0, None)]

# Perform optimization
print("Starting parameter fitting for reversible model...")
result_reversible = minimize(objective_function_reversible, initial_params_reversible, args=(base_sbml_string_reversible, experimental_conditions), method='L-BFGS-B', bounds=bounds_reversible)

print("Optimization finished.")
print("Result:", result_reversible)

# Get the fitted parameters
fitted_params_reversible = result_reversible.x
print("Fitted parameters (k1, k2, k_neg2, k3, k_neg3, k4):", fitted_params_reversible)

# Update the SBML model with fitted parameters
fitted_sbml_string_reversible = update_sbml_params_reversible(base_sbml_string_reversible, fitted_params_reversible)

# Store the fitted reversible SBML model
shared_variables.add("fitted_sbml_model_reversible", fitted_sbml_string_reversible)

# Simulate the model with fitted parameters for both conditions and print comparison
print("\n--- Comparison with Fitted Reversible Model ---")

# Condition 0 (Original)
print("\nCondition: Original Initial Concentrations")
sim_data_fitted_0 = simulate_with_ic(fitted_sbml_string_reversible, experimental_conditions[0][2])
print("Simulation Data (first 10 rows):")
print(sim_data_fitted_0.head(10))
print("\nExperimental Data (first 10 rows):")
print(experimental_conditions[0][1][:10]) # Print first 10 rows of species data
# Calculate SSE for condition 0
species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time']
sim_species_data_0 = sim_data_fitted_0[species_ids]
exp_species_data_0 = experimental_conditions[0][1]
exp_times_0 = experimental_conditions[0][0]
interp_sim_data_0 = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data_0)
for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
     interp_sim_data_0[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times_0, sim_data_fitted_0['Time'], sim_data_fitted_0[species_id])
sse_0 = np.sum((interp_sim_data_0 - exp_species_data_0)**2)
print(f"\nSum of Squared Errors for Condition 0: {sse_0}")


# Condition 3 (Perturbed)
print("\nCondition: Perturbed Initial Concentration (id_6m7j=0.5)")
sim_data_fitted_3 = simulate_with_ic(fitted_sbml_string_reversible, experimental_conditions[1][2])
print("Simulation Data (first 10 rows):")
print(sim_data_fitted_3.head(10))
print("\nExperimental Data (first 10 rows):")
print(experimental_conditions[1][1][:10]) # Print first 10 rows of species data
# Calculate SSE for condition 3
species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_3.columns if col != 'Time']
sim_species_data_3 = sim_data_fitted_3[species_ids]
exp_species_data_3 = experimental_conditions[1][1]
exp_times_3 = experimental_conditions[1][0]
interp_sim_data_3 = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data_3)
for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
     interp_sim_data_3[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times_3, sim_data_fitted_3['Time'], sim_data_fitted_3[species_id])
sse_3 = np.sum((interp_sim_data_3 - exp_species_data_3)**2)
print(f"\nSum of Squared Errors for Condition 3: {sse_3}")

print(f"\nTotal SSE for both conditions: {result_reversible.fun}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 name 'doc' is not defined

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 15/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 6
## Thoughts
I encountered a `NameError: name 'doc' is not defined`. This happened because I tried to access `doc` outside the scope where it was defined within the `update_sbml_params_reversible` function. The `simulate_with_ic` function also needs to load the SBML string into a `doc` object.

I need to fix the `update_sbml_params_reversible` and `simulate_with_ic` functions to correctly load the SBML string into a `doc` object at the beginning of each function call.

Let's correct the code and rerun the parameter fitting for the reversible model using both experimental datasets.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import minimize

# Access the experimental data from both iterations
exp_data_0 = experiment_history['iteration_0']
exp_data_3 = experiment_history['iteration_3']

# Combine experimental data and create a list of (time, species_data, initial_conditions) tuples
# Initial conditions for iteration_0 were effectively [0, 0, 0] for id_5mud, id_cue9, id_6m7j
# Initial conditions for iteration_3 were [0, 0, 0.5] for id_5mud, id_cue9, id_6m7j
experimental_conditions = [
    (exp_data_0['Time'].values, exp_data_0[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}),
    (exp_data_3['Time'].values, exp_data_3[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.5})
]

# Load the initial SBML model structure (from iteration 1 code, before fitting)
# We need to start from the base structure with Source/Sink and reactions, but add reversibility
# Let's reconstruct the base model with reversible reactions
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add 'Source' (constant species) and 'Sink' (boundary species) if not already present
if not model.getSpecies("Source"):
    source_species = model.createSpecies()
    source_species.setId("Source")
    source_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    source_species.setInitialConcentration(1.0)
    source_species.setConstant(True)

if not model.getSpecies("Sink"):
    sink_species = model.createSpecies()
    sink_species.setId("Sink")
    sink_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    sink_species.setInitialConcentration(0.0)
    sink_species.setBoundaryCondition(True)

# Remove existing reactions if any (to avoid duplicates from previous runs)
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add parameters for rate constants (k1, k2, k_neg2, k3, k_neg3, k4)
param_ids = ["k1", "k2", "k_neg2", "k3", "k_neg3", "k4"]
for param_id in param_ids:
    if not model.getParameter(param_id):
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(param_id)
        p.setValue(0.1) # Initial guess
        p.setConstant(True)

# Add Reaction 1: Source -> id_6m7j (Irreversible)
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("reaction1_Source_to_6m7j")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
r1_reactant = reaction1.createReactant()
r1_reactant.setSpecies("Source")
r1_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r1_product = reaction1.createProduct()
r1_product.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r1_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law1.setFormula("k1 * Source")

# Add Reaction 2: id_6m7j <=> id_cue9 (Reversible)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("reaction2_6m7j_to_cue9")
reaction2.setReversible(True) # Set to reversible
r2_reactant = reaction2.createReactant()
r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r2_product = reaction2.createProduct()
r2_product.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r2_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
# Mass action for reversible reaction: k_forward * Reactants - k_reverse * Products
kinetic_law2.setFormula("k2 * id_6m7j - k_neg2 * id_cue9")

# Add Reaction 3: id_cue9 <=> id_5mud (Reversible)
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("reaction3_cue9_to_5mud")
reaction3.setReversible(True) # Set to reversible
r3_reactant = reaction3.createReactant()
r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r3_product = reaction3.createProduct()
r3_product.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r3_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
# Mass action for reversible reaction: k_forward * Reactants - k_reverse * Products
kinetic_law3.setFormula("k3 * id_cue9 - k_neg3 * id_5mud")

# Add Reaction 4: id_5mud -> Sink (Irreversible, based on k4=0 fit)
reaction4 = model.createReaction()
reaction4.setId("reaction4_5mud_to_Sink")
reaction4.setReversible(False) # Keep irreversible for now
r4_reactant = reaction4.createReactant()
r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r4_product = reaction4.createProduct()
r4_product.setSpecies("Sink")
r4_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law4 = reaction4.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law4.setFormula("k4 * id_5mud")


# Get the base SBML string with reversible reactions
base_sbml_string_reversible = libsbml.SBMLWriter().writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

def update_sbml_params_reversible(sbml_string, params):
    """Updates parameter values in an SBML string for the reversible model."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()
    param_ids = ["k1", "k2", "k_neg2", "k3", "k_neg3", "k4"]
    for i, param_id in enumerate(param_ids):
        p = model.getParameter(param_id)
        if p:
            p.setValue(params[i])
        else:
            # This should not happen if param_ids match model parameters
            print(f"Warning: Parameter {param_id} not found.")
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    return writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

def simulate_with_ic(sbml_string, initial_conditions):
    """Simulates an SBML model with specified initial concentrations."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string) # Load doc here
    model = doc.getModel()

    # Temporarily change initial concentrations for simulation
    # Store original ICs if needed, but here we just modify the temporary doc
    for species_id, conc in initial_conditions.items():
        species = model.getSpecies(species_id)
        if species:
            species.setInitialConcentration(conc)
        else:
             print(f"Warning: Species {species_id} not found for IC change.")

    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    sim_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

    sim_data = simulate(sim_sbml)

    # No need to restore ICs on the doc object as we reload from string each time

    return sim_data


def objective_function_reversible(params, base_sbml_string, experimental_conditions):
    """Calculates the sum of squared errors for multiple experimental conditions."""
    try:
        # Ensure parameters are non-negative
        if any(p < 0 for p in params):
            return np.inf

        # Update the base SBML model with current parameters
        updated_sbml = update_sbml_params_reversible(base_sbml_string, params)

        total_sse = 0
        for exp_times, exp_species_data, initial_conditions in experimental_conditions:
            # Simulate the model with specific initial conditions
            sim_data = simulate_with_ic(updated_sbml, initial_conditions)

            if sim_data is None or sim_data.empty or 'Time' not in sim_data.columns:
                 print("Simulation failed or returned empty data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf # Penalize if any simulation fails

            # Ensure simulation covers all experimental time points
            if sim_data['Time'].iloc[-1] < exp_times[-1]:
                 print("Simulation time range is shorter than experimental data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf # Penalize if simulation doesn't cover the range

            # Select only the species columns that are in exp_species_data
            species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time'] # Use columns from one exp_data
            sim_species_data = sim_data[species_ids]

            # Interpolate simulation data to experimental time points
            interp_sim_data = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data)
            for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
                 interp_sim_data[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times, sim_data['Time'], sim_data[species_id])

            # Calculate sum of squared errors for this condition
            sse = np.sum((interp_sim_data - exp_species_data)**2)
            total_sse += sse

        return total_sse

    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error during objective function evaluation: {e}")
        return np.inf


# Initial guess for parameters (k1, k2, k_neg2, k3, k_neg3, k4)
# Use previous fitted values as a starting point, add small values for new reverse rates
# Previous fit: [0.91065756 0.36067614 0.04005083 0.        ] (k1, k2, k3, k4)
# New params: k1, k2, k_neg2, k3, k_neg3, k4
initial_params_reversible = [0.91, 0.36, 0.01, 0.04, 0.01, 0.0] # k4 was 0, keep it low or 0

# Parameter bounds (non-negative)
bounds_reversible = [(0, None), (0, None), (0, None), (0, None), (0, None), (0, None)]

# Perform optimization
print("Starting parameter fitting for reversible model...")
result_reversible = minimize(objective_function_reversible, initial_params_reversible, args=(base_sbml_string_reversible, experimental_conditions), method='L-BFGS-B', bounds=bounds_reversible)

print("Optimization finished.")
print("Result:", result_reversible)

# Get the fitted parameters
fitted_params_reversible = result_reversible.x
print("Fitted parameters (k1, k2, k_neg2, k3, k_neg3, k4):", fitted_params_reversible)

# Update the SBML model with fitted parameters
fitted_sbml_string_reversible = update_sbml_params_reversible(base_sbml_string_reversible, fitted_params_reversible)

# Store the fitted reversible SBML model
shared_variables.add("fitted_sbml_model_reversible", fitted_sbml_string_reversible)

# Simulate the model with fitted parameters for both conditions and print comparison
print("\n--- Comparison with Fitted Reversible Model ---")

# Condition 0 (Original)
print("\nCondition: Original Initial Concentrations")
sim_data_fitted_0 = simulate_with_ic(fitted_sbml_string_reversible, experimental_conditions[0][2])
print("Simulation Data (first 10 rows):")
print(sim_data_fitted_0.head(10))
print("\nExperimental Data (first 10 rows):")
print(experimental_conditions[0][1][:10]) # Print first 10 rows of species data
# Calculate SSE for condition 0
species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time']
sim_species_data_0 = sim_data_fitted_0[species_ids]
exp_species_data_0 = experimental_conditions[0][1]
exp_times_0 = experimental_conditions[0][0]
interp_sim_data_0 = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data_0)
for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
     interp_sim_data_0[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times_0, sim_data_fitted_0['Time'], sim_data_fitted_0[species_id])
sse_0 = np.sum((interp_sim_data_0 - exp_species_data_0)**2)
print(f"\nSum of Squared Errors for Condition 0: {sse_0}")


# Condition 3 (Perturbed)
print("\nCondition: Perturbed Initial Concentration (id_6m7j=0.5)")
sim_data_fitted_3 = simulate_with_ic(fitted_sbml_string_reversible, experimental_conditions[1][2])
print("Simulation Data (first 10 rows):")
print(sim_data_fitted_3.head(10))
print("\nExperimental Data (first 10 rows):")
print(experimental_conditions[1][1][:10]) # Print first 10 rows of species data
# Calculate SSE for condition 3
species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_3.columns if col != 'Time']
sim_species_data_3 = sim_data_fitted_3[species_ids]
exp_species_data_3 = experimental_conditions[1][1]
exp_times_3 = experimental_conditions[1][0]
interp_sim_data_3 = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data_3)
for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
     interp_sim_data_3[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times_3, sim_data_fitted_3['Time'], sim_data_fitted_3[species_id])
sse_3 = np.sum((interp_sim_data_3 - exp_species_data_3)**2)
print(f"\nSum of Squared Errors for Condition 3: {sse_3}")

print(f"\nTotal SSE for both conditions: {result_reversible.fun}")
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Starting parameter fitting for reversible model...
Optimization finished.
Result:   message: CONVERGENCE: RELATIVE REDUCTION OF F <= FACTR*EPSMCH
  success: True
   status: 0
      fun: 408.66606216484183
        x: [ 1.016e+00  3.622e-01  0.000e+00  4.983e-02  0.000e+00
             0.000e+00]
      nit: 24
      jac: [ 3.996e-03  3.570e-02  7.934e+02  2.475e-02  1.343e+02
             1.579e+03]
     nfev: 231
     njev: 33
 hess_inv: <6x6 LbfgsInvHessProduct with dtype=float64>
Fitted parameters (k1, k2, k_neg2, k3, k_neg3, k4): [1.01594412 0.36223431 0.         0.04982719 0.         0.        ]

--- Comparison with Fitted Reversible Model ---

Condition: Original Initial Concentrations
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
        id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000e+00  0.000000  0.000000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  1.770800e-08  0.000059  0.018062  0.981879   0.0  0.018
2  1.407645e-07  0.000234  0.035679  0.964087   0.0  0.036
3  4.720619e-07  0.000523  0.052860  0.946617   0.0  0.054
4  1.111843e-06  0.000922  0.069614  0.929463   0.0  0.072
5  2.157770e-06  0.001428  0.085949  0.912621   0.0  0.090
6  3.704968e-06  0.002039  0.101874  0.896083   0.0  0.108
7  5.846076e-06  0.002752  0.117397  0.879845   0.0  0.126
8  8.671303e-06  0.003564  0.132525  0.863902   0.0  0.144
9  1.226846e-05  0.004473  0.147267  0.848247   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00]
 [1.16517089e-08 1.94283434e-05 5.40000000e-03]
 [9.31438640e-08 7.76667726e-05 1.08000000e-02]
 [3.14077875e-07 1.74645498e-04 1.61999998e-02]
 [7.43811263e-07 3.10294846e-04 2.15999993e-02]
 [1.45145327e-06 4.84545265e-04 2.69999977e-02]
 [2.50586020e-06 6.97327326e-04 3.23999944e-02]
 [3.97564015e-06 9.48571718e-04 3.77999878e-02]
 [5.92915431e-06 1.23820924e-03 4.31999763e-02]
 [8.43452078e-06 1.56617079e-03 4.85999570e-02]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 0: 304.5942946287543

Condition: Perturbed Initial Concentration (id_6m7j=0.5)
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
    id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000  0.000000  0.500000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  0.000001  0.003307  0.514812  0.981879   0.0  0.018
2  0.000006  0.006706  0.529201  0.964087   0.0  0.036
3  0.000014  0.010195  0.543175  0.946617   0.0  0.054
4  0.000024  0.013771  0.556742  0.929463   0.0  0.072
5  0.000038  0.017430  0.569911  0.912621   0.0  0.090
6  0.000056  0.021170  0.582691  0.896083   0.0  0.108
7  0.000076  0.024989  0.595089  0.879845   0.0  0.126
8  0.000100  0.028885  0.607113  0.863902   0.0  0.144
9  0.000128  0.032854  0.618771  0.848247   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00 5.00000000e-01]
 [3.24776542e-06 3.61619023e-03 5.05399969e-01]
 [1.30220734e-05 7.26472139e-03 5.10799746e-01]
 [2.93692965e-05 1.09455332e-02 5.16199135e-01]
 [5.23356030e-05 1.46585641e-02 5.21597929e-01]
 [8.19669833e-05 1.84037511e-02 5.26995917e-01]
 [1.18309231e-04 2.21810299e-02 5.32392877e-01]
 [1.61407931e-04 2.59903345e-02 5.37788583e-01]
 [2.11308467e-04 2.98315975e-02 5.43182798e-01]
 [2.68056015e-04 3.37047498e-02 5.48575279e-01]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 3: 104.07176753608749

Total SSE for both conditions: 408.66606216484183

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 14/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model_reversible)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 7
## Thoughts
The parameter fitting for the reversible model using both datasets converged. The fitted parameters are: k1=1.016, k2=0.362, k_neg2=0.0, k3=0.0498, k_neg3=0.0, k4=0.0. Interestingly, the fitted reverse rates (k_neg2 and k_neg3) are zero, and k4 remains zero. This suggests that the reversible reactions and the sink reaction for `id_5mud` are not supported by the data, and the best fit is still an irreversible linear chain, albeit with slightly different forward rates compared to the previous fit on `iteration_0` alone.

The total SSE for both conditions is ~408. The SSE for condition 0 (original) is ~304, which is similar to the previous fit (~299) that only used this data. The SSE for condition 3 (perturbed) is ~104. While this is lower than the ~124 calculated manually in Iteration 4 (likely due to slight differences in interpolation or calculation), it's still a significant error, and the visual comparison of the first few data points shows the simulation doesn't perfectly match the experiment, especially for `id_6m7j` and `id_cue9` in the perturbed condition.

The fact that the reversible model didn't improve the fit and resulted in zero reverse rates suggests that reversibility might not be the missing mechanism. The linear chain structure (Source -> `id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9` -> `id_5mud`) with irreversible steps seems to be the best fit *among the models tested so far*, but it's still not fully capturing the system's behavior, particularly under perturbation.

The zero value for k4 (consumption of `id_5mud`) is persistent across fits. This could mean `id_5mud` is not consumed, or it's consumed by a mechanism not involving a simple mass-action sink. However, the concentration of `id_5mud` does seem to plateau or even slightly decrease at very late time points in the original experiment (iteration_0 data, not shown in head but visible in full data). This might suggest a very slow consumption or equilibrium, or perhaps the 'Source' is depleting (though it's defined as constant). Let's assume for now k4 is indeed zero and `id_5mud` is the final product that accumulates.

The remaining discrepancies, especially in the perturbed experiment, could be due to:
1.  **Non-mass-action kinetics:** The reactions might be enzyme-catalyzed or regulated, following Michaelis-Menten or other rate laws.
2.  **Feedback regulation:** One species might activate or inhibit the production or consumption of another.
3.  **Parallel pathways:** There might be alternative routes for production or consumption.

Given the sequential nature, let's first explore non-mass-action kinetics. Michaelis-Menten kinetics are common for biological systems. I will modify the model to use Michaelis-Menten kinetics for the reactions between species (`id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9` and `id_cue9` -> `id_5mud`). The production from 'Source' and potential consumption of `id_5mud` can remain mass action for simplicity initially.

Michaelis-Menten kinetics for A -> B is typically `Vmax * [A] / (Km + [A])`. This introduces two parameters per reaction (Vmax and Km).
Reaction 1: Source -> `id_6m7j` (Mass Action: k1 * Source)
Reaction 2: `id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9` (Michaelis-Menten: Vmax2 * [id_6m7j] / (Km2 + [id_6m7j]))
Reaction 3: `id_cue9` -> `id_5mud` (Michaelis-Menten: Vmax3 * [id_cue9] / (Km3 + [id_cue9]))
Reaction 4: `id_5mud` -> Sink (Mass Action: k4 * id_5mud) - still likely k4=0.

This new model will have 6 parameters: k1, Vmax2, Km2, Vmax3, Km3, k4. I will fit these parameters using both `iteration_0` and `iteration_3` data.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import minimize

# Access the experimental data from both iterations
exp_data_0 = experiment_history['iteration_0']
exp_data_3 = experiment_history['iteration_3']

# Combine experimental data and create a list of (time, species_data, initial_conditions) tuples
experimental_conditions = [
    (exp_data_0['Time'].values, exp_data_0[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}),
    (exp_data_3['Time'].values, exp_data_3[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.5})
]

# Load the initial SBML model structure
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add 'Source' (constant species) and 'Sink' (boundary species) if not already present
if not model.getSpecies("Source"):
    source_species = model.createSpecies()
    source_species.setId("Source")
    source_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    source_species.setInitialConcentration(1.0)
    source_species.setConstant(True)

if not model.getSpecies("Sink"):
    sink_species = model.createSpecies()
    sink_species.setId("Sink")
    sink_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    sink_species.setInitialConcentration(0.0)
    sink_species.setBoundaryCondition(True)

# Remove existing reactions if any
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add parameters for rate constants (k1, Vmax2, Km2, Vmax3, Km3, k4)
param_ids = ["k1", "Vmax2", "Km2", "Vmax3", "Km3", "k4"]
# Initial guesses - k1 and k4 from previous fit, Vmax/Km need estimation
# Vmax is roughly k_forward * Substrate_max, Km is roughly Substrate_at_half_Vmax
# Let's use some small positive values as initial guesses
initial_param_values = {
    "k1": 1.0, # From previous fit
    "Vmax2": 0.5, # Guess
    "Km2": 0.1,   # Guess
    "Vmax3": 0.1, # Guess
    "Km3": 0.1,   # Guess
    "k4": 0.0     # From previous fit
}

for param_id, value in initial_param_values.items():
    if not model.getParameter(param_id):
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(param_id)
        p.setValue(value)
        p.setConstant(True)

# Add Reaction 1: Source -> id_6m7j (Mass Action)
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("reaction1_Source_to_6m7j")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
r1_reactant = reaction1.createReactant()
r1_reactant.setSpecies("Source")
r1_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r1_product = reaction1.createProduct()
r1_product.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r1_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law1.setFormula("k1 * Source")

# Add Reaction 2: id_6m7j -> id_cue9 (Michaelis-Menten)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("reaction2_6m7j_to_cue9")
reaction2.setReversible(False) # Assuming irreversible MM for now
r2_reactant = reaction2.createReactant()
r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r2_product = reaction2.createProduct()
r2_product.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r2_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
# Need to ensure species IDs are correctly referenced in the formula
kinetic_law2.setFormula("(Vmax2 * id_6m7j) / (Km2 + id_6m7j)")

# Add Reaction 3: id_cue9 -> id_5mud (Michaelis-Menten)
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("reaction3_cue9_to_5mud")
reaction3.setReversible(False) # Assuming irreversible MM for now
r3_reactant = reaction3.createReactant()
r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r3_product = reaction3.createProduct()
r3_product.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r3_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
# Need to ensure species IDs are correctly referenced in the formula
kinetic_law3.setFormula("(Vmax3 * id_cue9) / (Km3 + id_cue9)")

# Add Reaction 4: id_5mud -> Sink (Mass Action)
reaction4 = model.createReaction()
reaction4.setId("reaction4_5mud_to_Sink")
reaction4.setReversible(False)
r4_reactant = reaction4.createReactant()
r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r4_product = reaction4.createProduct()
r4_product.setSpecies("Sink")
r4_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law4 = reaction4.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law4.setFormula("k4 * id_5mud")


# Get the base SBML string with Michaelis-Menten kinetics
base_sbml_string_mm = libsbml.SBMLWriter().writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

def update_sbml_params_mm(sbml_string, params):
    """Updates parameter values in an SBML string for the MM model."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()
    param_ids = ["k1", "Vmax2", "Km2", "Vmax3", "Km3", "k4"]
    for i, param_id in enumerate(param_ids):
        p = model.getParameter(param_id)
        if p:
            p.setValue(params[i])
        else:
            print(f"Warning: Parameter {param_id} not found.")
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    return writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

def simulate_with_ic(sbml_string, initial_conditions):
    """Simulates an SBML model with specified initial concentrations."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()

    for species_id, conc in initial_conditions.items():
        species = model.getSpecies(species_id)
        if species:
            species.setInitialConcentration(conc)
        else:
             print(f"Warning: Species {species_id} not found for IC change.")

    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    sim_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

    sim_data = simulate(sim_sbml)
    return sim_data


def objective_function_mm(params, base_sbml_string, experimental_conditions):
    """Calculates the sum of squared errors for multiple experimental conditions."""
    try:
        # Ensure parameters are non-negative (Km must be > 0)
        if any(p < 0 for p in params) or params[2] <= 0 or params[4] <= 0: # Km2, Km3 must be > 0
            return np.inf

        # Update the base SBML model with current parameters
        updated_sbml = update_sbml_params_mm(base_sbml_string, params)

        total_sse = 0
        for exp_times, exp_species_data, initial_conditions in experimental_conditions:
            # Simulate the model with specific initial conditions
            sim_data = simulate_with_ic(updated_sbml, initial_conditions)

            if sim_data is None or sim_data.empty or 'Time' not in sim_data.columns:
                 print("Simulation failed or returned empty data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf

            if sim_data['Time'].iloc[-1] < exp_times[-1]:
                 print("Simulation time range is shorter than experimental data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf

            species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time']
            sim_species_data = sim_data[species_ids]

            interp_sim_data = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data)
            for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
                 interp_sim_data[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times, sim_data['Time'], sim_data[species_id])

            sse = np.sum((interp_sim_data - exp_species_data)**2)
            total_sse += sse

        return total_sse

    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error during objective function evaluation: {e}")
        return np.inf


# Initial guess for parameters (k1, Vmax2, Km2, Vmax3, Km3, k4)
initial_params_mm = [initial_param_values[id] for id in param_ids]

# Parameter bounds (non-negative, Km > 0)
bounds_mm = [(0, None), (0, None), (1e-6, None), (0, None), (1e-6, None), (0, None)] # Km bounds > 0

# Perform optimization
print("Starting parameter fitting for Michaelis-Menten model...")
result_mm = minimize(objective_function_mm, initial_params_mm, args=(base_sbml_string_mm, experimental_conditions), method='L-BFGS-B', bounds=bounds_mm)

print("Optimization finished.")
print("Result:", result_mm)

# Get the fitted parameters
fitted_params_mm = result_mm.x
print("Fitted parameters (k1, Vmax2, Km2, Vmax3, Km3, k4):", fitted_params_mm)

# Update the SBML model with fitted parameters
fitted_sbml_string_mm = update_sbml_params_mm(base_sbml_string_mm, fitted_params_mm)

# Store the fitted MM SBML model
shared_variables.add("fitted_sbml_model_mm", fitted_sbml_string_mm)

# Simulate the model with fitted parameters for both conditions and print comparison
print("\n--- Comparison with Fitted Michaelis-Menten Model ---")

# Condition 0 (Original)
print("\nCondition: Original Initial Concentrations")
sim_data_fitted_0 = simulate_with_ic(fitted_sbml_string_mm, experimental_conditions[0][2])
print("Simulation Data (first 10 rows):")
print(sim_data_fitted_0.head(10))
print("\nExperimental Data (first 10 rows):")
print(experimental_conditions[0][1][:10])
species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time']
sim_species_data_0 = sim_data_fitted_0[species_ids]
exp_species_data_0 = experimental_conditions[0][1]
exp_times_0 = experimental_conditions[0][0]
interp_sim_data_0 = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data_0)
for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
     interp_sim_data_0[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times_0, sim_data_fitted_0['Time'], sim_data_fitted_0[species_id])
sse_0 = np.sum((interp_sim_data_0 - exp_species_data_0)**2)
print(f"\nSum of Squared Errors for Condition 0: {sse_0}")


# Condition 3 (Perturbed)
print("\nCondition: Perturbed Initial Concentration (id_6m7j=0.5)")
sim_data_fitted_3 = simulate_with_ic(fitted_sbml_string_mm, experimental_conditions[1][2])
print("Simulation Data (first 10 rows):")
print(sim_data_fitted_3.head(10))
print("\nExperimental Data (first 10 rows):")
print(experimental_conditions[1][1][:10])
species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_3.columns if col != 'Time']
sim_species_data_3 = sim_data_fitted_3[species_ids]
exp_species_data_3 = experimental_conditions[1][1]
exp_times_3 = experimental_conditions[1][0]
interp_sim_data_3 = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data_3)
for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
     interp_sim_data_3[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times_3, sim_data_fitted_3['Time'], sim_data_fitted_3[species_id])
sse_3 = np.sum((interp_sim_data_3 - exp_species_data_3)**2)
print(f"\nSum of Squared Errors for Condition 3: {sse_3}")

print(f"\nTotal SSE for both conditions: {result_mm.fun}")
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Starting parameter fitting for Michaelis-Menten model...
Optimization finished.
Result:   message: CONVERGENCE: RELATIVE REDUCTION OF F <= FACTR*EPSMCH
  success: True
   status: 0
      fun: 977.9747466444844
        x: [ 9.992e-01  4.952e-01  2.305e-01  4.020e-02  5.309e-01
             7.198e-01]
      nit: 4
      jac: [ 1.886e+01  5.936e+02 -4.655e+02 -1.224e+02 -1.261e+01
             9.021e+01]
     nfev: 168
     njev: 24
 hess_inv: <6x6 LbfgsInvHessProduct with dtype=float64>
Fitted parameters (k1, Vmax2, Km2, Vmax3, Km3, k4): [0.99924349 0.49520195 0.23049859 0.04019978 0.53087796 0.71983849]

--- Comparison with Fitted Michaelis-Menten Model ---

Condition: Original Initial Concentrations
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
        id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000e+00  0.000000  0.000000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  1.495353e-07  0.000325  0.017501  0.982174   0.0  0.018
2  1.135424e-06  0.001221  0.034112  0.964667   0.0  0.036
3  3.646129e-06  0.002592  0.049933  0.947471   0.0  0.054
4  8.240958e-06  0.004367  0.065043  0.930582   0.0  0.072
5  1.537621e-05  0.006487  0.079504  0.913993   0.0  0.090
6  2.542469e-05  0.008908  0.093365  0.897701   0.0  0.108
7  3.869012e-05  0.011591  0.106670  0.881699   0.0  0.126
8  5.541871e-05  0.014507  0.119454  0.865982   0.0  0.144
9  7.580839e-05  0.017630  0.131746  0.850545   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00]
 [1.16517089e-08 1.94283434e-05 5.40000000e-03]
 [9.31438640e-08 7.76667726e-05 1.08000000e-02]
 [3.14077875e-07 1.74645498e-04 1.61999998e-02]
 [7.43811263e-07 3.10294846e-04 2.15999993e-02]
 [1.45145327e-06 4.84545265e-04 2.69999977e-02]
 [2.50586020e-06 6.97327326e-04 3.23999944e-02]
 [3.97564015e-06 9.48571718e-04 3.77999878e-02]
 [5.92915431e-06 1.23820924e-03 4.31999763e-02]
 [8.43452078e-06 1.56617079e-03 4.85999570e-02]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 0: 525.9605064086093

Condition: Perturbed Initial Concentration (id_6m7j=0.5)
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
    id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000  0.000000  0.500000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  0.000004  0.006119  0.511702  0.982174   0.0  0.018
2  0.000016  0.012273  0.523044  0.964667   0.0  0.036
3  0.000036  0.018460  0.534032  0.947471   0.0  0.054
4  0.000064  0.024677  0.544677  0.930582   0.0  0.072
5  0.000099  0.030921  0.554984  0.913993   0.0  0.090
6  0.000141  0.037192  0.564962  0.897701   0.0  0.108
7  0.000190  0.043488  0.574618  0.881699   0.0  0.126
8  0.000246  0.049806  0.583958  0.865982   0.0  0.144
9  0.000308  0.056145  0.592990  0.850545   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00 5.00000000e-01]
 [3.24776542e-06 3.61619023e-03 5.05399969e-01]
 [1.30220734e-05 7.26472139e-03 5.10799746e-01]
 [2.93692965e-05 1.09455332e-02 5.16199135e-01]
 [5.23356030e-05 1.46585641e-02 5.21597929e-01]
 [8.19669833e-05 1.84037511e-02 5.26995917e-01]
 [1.18309231e-04 2.21810299e-02 5.32392877e-01]
 [1.61407931e-04 2.59903345e-02 5.37788583e-01]
 [2.11308467e-04 2.98315975e-02 5.43182798e-01]
 [2.68056015e-04 3.37047498e-02 5.48575279e-01]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 3: 452.0142402358751

Total SSE for both conditions: 977.9747466444844

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 13/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model_reversible, fitted_sbml_model_mm)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 8
## Thoughts
The Michaelis-Menten model fitting resulted in a total SSE of ~978, which is significantly higher than the SSE (~408) from the simple irreversible mass-action model fitted to the same data. This indicates that introducing Michaelis-Menten kinetics in this way does not improve the fit and might even make it worse, at least with the current initial guesses and optimization method. The fitted parameters include a non-zero k4 (~0.72), suggesting `id_5mud` might be consumed after all, which contradicts the previous fits where k4 went to zero. This inconsistency might point to issues with the model structure or the complexity of the fitting landscape.

The simple irreversible mass-action model (Source -> `id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9` -> `id_5mud`) with k4=0 seems to be the best performing model so far, despite its limitations in predicting the perturbed experiment. The fitted parameters for this model (from Iteration 6, where reverse rates were zero) were k1=1.016, k2=0.362, k3=0.0498, k4=0.0.

Let's re-examine the experimental data, particularly the perturbed experiment (iteration_3). When `id_6m7j` starts high (0.5), its concentration initially *increases* slightly before decreasing. The simple mass-action model predicts it should decrease immediately if k1*Source < k2*id_6m7j. The initial increase suggests the production rate (k1*Source) is still dominant or there's an additional production mechanism for `id_6m7j` that is not simply from 'Source'. However, the original experiment (iteration_0) shows `id_6m7j` starting from 0 and increasing, consistent with production from 'Source'.

The discrepancy in the perturbed experiment might be explained by:
1.  **Feedback inhibition/activation:** Perhaps `id_6m7j` production is inhibited by high concentrations of `id_6m7j` itself (product inhibition) or downstream species. Or perhaps `id_6m7j` consumption is activated by something.
2.  **Different initial conditions in the *true* system:** Although the experiment requested `id_6m7j=0.5`, the true system might have other species at non-zero concentrations too, which are not specified in the request but influence the dynamics. However, the prompt states "all species are observable" and "You do not need to add new species", implying the three species are the only dynamic ones. The 'Source' and 'Sink' are implicit boundary/constant species.
3.  **More complex kinetics:** Maybe a different form of non-mass-action kinetics is needed.

Let's consider feedback. Given the sequential nature, a plausible feedback could be product inhibition. For example, `id_cue9` or `id_5mud` could inhibit the production of `id_6m7j` or the conversion of `id_6m7j` to `id_cue9`.

Let's try adding product inhibition to the first reaction (Source -> `id_6m7j`) by `id_6m7j` itself or `id_cue9`. A simple way to model inhibition is using a Hill function or by modifying the mass action term. A common form for inhibition of rate `v` by inhibitor `I` is `v / (1 + ([I]/Ki)^n)`.

Let's try inhibiting the first reaction (Source -> `id_6m7j`) by `id_6m7j`. The rate would become `k1 * Source / (1 + ([id_6m7j]/Ki1)^n1)`. Let's start with a simple linear inhibition (n1=1). Rate = `k1 * Source / (1 + id_6m7j/Ki1)`. This adds one parameter, Ki1.

Model structure:
Reaction 1: Source -> `id_6m7j` (Inhibited Mass Action: k1 * Source / (1 + id_6m7j/Ki1))
Reaction 2: `id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9` (Mass Action: k2 * id_6m7j)
Reaction 3: `id_cue9` -> `id_5mud` (Mass Action: k3 * id_cue9)
Reaction 4: `id_5mud` -> Sink (Mass Action: k4 * id_5mud) - keep k4=0 initially.

This model has 5 parameters: k1, Ki1, k2, k3, k4. I will fit these parameters using both `iteration_0` and `iteration_3` data.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import minimize

# Access the experimental data from both iterations
exp_data_0 = experiment_history['iteration_0']
exp_data_3 = experiment_history['iteration_3']

# Combine experimental data and create a list of (time, species_data, initial_conditions) tuples
experimental_conditions = [
    (exp_data_0['Time'].values, exp_data_0[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}),
    (exp_data_3['Time'].values, exp_data_3[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.5})
]

# Load the initial SBML model structure
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add 'Source' (constant species) and 'Sink' (boundary species) if not already present
if not model.getSpecies("Source"):
    source_species = model.createSpecies()
    source_species.setId("Source")
    source_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    source_species.setInitialConcentration(1.0)
    source_species.setConstant(True)

if not model.getSpecies("Sink"):
    sink_species = model.createSpecies()
    sink_species.setId("Sink")
    sink_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    sink_species.setInitialConcentration(0.0)
    sink_species.setBoundaryCondition(True)

# Remove existing reactions if any
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add parameters for rate constants (k1, Ki1, k2, k3, k4)
param_ids = ["k1", "Ki1", "k2", "k3", "k4"]
# Initial guesses - k1, k2, k3 from previous mass-action fit, k4=0, Ki1 needs guess
# Ki is the concentration at which rate is halved. Look at max concentration of id_6m7j (~1.2 in exp_0)
# Let's guess Ki1 around that value, maybe 0.5 or 1.0
initial_param_values = {
    "k1": 1.0,   # From previous fit
    "Ki1": 0.5,  # Guess for inhibition constant
    "k2": 0.36,  # From previous fit
    "k3": 0.05,  # From previous fit
    "k4": 0.0    # From previous fit
}

for param_id, value in initial_param_values.items():
    if not model.getParameter(param_id):
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(param_id)
        p.setValue(value)
        p.setConstant(True)

# Add Reaction 1: Source -> id_6m7j (Inhibited Mass Action by id_6m7j)
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("reaction1_Source_to_6m7j")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
r1_reactant = reaction1.createReactant()
r1_reactant.setSpecies("Source")
r1_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r1_product = reaction1.createProduct()
r1_product.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r1_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
# Rate = k1 * Source / (1 + id_6m7j/Ki1)
kinetic_law1.setFormula("(k1 * Source) / (1 + id_6m7j / Ki1)")

# Add Reaction 2: id_6m7j -> id_cue9 (Mass Action)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("reaction2_6m7j_to_cue9")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
r2_reactant = reaction2.createReactant()
r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r2_product = reaction2.createProduct()
r2_product.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r2_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law2.setFormula("k2 * id_6m7j")

# Add Reaction 3: id_cue9 -> id_5mud (Mass Action)
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("reaction3_cue9_to_5mud")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
r3_reactant = reaction3.createReactant()
r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r3_product = reaction3.createProduct()
r3_product.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r3_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law3.setFormula("k3 * id_cue9")

# Add Reaction 4: id_5mud -> Sink (Mass Action)
reaction4 = model.createReaction()
reaction4.setId("reaction4_5mud_to_Sink")
reaction4.setReversible(False)
r4_reactant = reaction4.createReactant()
r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r4_product = reaction4.createProduct()
r4_product.setSpecies("Sink")
r4_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law4 = reaction4.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law4.setFormula("k4 * id_5mud")


# Get the base SBML string with inhibited kinetics
base_sbml_string_inhibited = libsbml.SBMLWriter().writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

def update_sbml_params_inhibited(sbml_string, params):
    """Updates parameter values in an SBML string for the inhibited model."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()
    param_ids = ["k1", "Ki1", "k2", "k3", "k4"]
    for i, param_id in enumerate(param_ids):
        p = model.getParameter(param_id)
        if p:
            p.setValue(params[i])
        else:
            print(f"Warning: Parameter {param_id} not found.")
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    return writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

def simulate_with_ic(sbml_string, initial_conditions):
    """Simulates an SBML model with specified initial concentrations."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()

    for species_id, conc in initial_conditions.items():
        species = model.getSpecies(species_id)
        if species:
            species.setInitialConcentration(conc)
        else:
             print(f"Warning: Species {species_id} not found for IC change.")

    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    sim_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

    sim_data = simulate(sim_sbml)
    return sim_data


def objective_function_inhibited(params, base_sbml_string, experimental_conditions):
    """Calculates the sum of squared errors for multiple experimental conditions."""
    try:
        # Ensure parameters are non-negative (Ki must be > 0)
        if any(p < 0 for p in params) or params[1] <= 0: # Ki1 must be > 0
            return np.inf

        # Update the base SBML model with current parameters
        updated_sbml = update_sbml_params_inhibited(base_sbml_string, params)

        total_sse = 0
        for exp_times, exp_species_data, initial_conditions in experimental_conditions:
            # Simulate the model with specific initial conditions
            sim_data = simulate_with_ic(updated_sbml, initial_conditions)

            if sim_data is None or sim_data.empty or 'Time' not in sim_data.columns:
                 print("Simulation failed or returned empty data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf

            if sim_data['Time'].iloc[-1] < exp_times[-1]:
                 print("Simulation time range is shorter than experimental data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf

            species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time']
            sim_species_data = sim_data[species_ids]

            interp_sim_data = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data)
            for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
                 interp_sim_data[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times, sim_data['Time'], sim_data[species_id])

            sse = np.sum((interp_sim_data - exp_species_data)**2)
            total_sse += sse

        return total_sse

    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error during objective function evaluation: {e}")
        return np.inf


# Initial guess for parameters (k1, Ki1, k2, k3, k4)
initial_params_inhibited = [initial_param_values[id] for id in param_ids]

# Parameter bounds (non-negative, Ki > 0)
bounds_inhibited = [(0, None), (1e-6, None), (0, None), (0, None), (0, None)] # Ki1 bound > 0

# Perform optimization
print("Starting parameter fitting for inhibited model...")
result_inhibited = minimize(objective_function_inhibited, initial_params_inhibited, args=(base_sbml_string_inhibited, experimental_conditions), method='L-BFGS-B', bounds=bounds_inhibited)

print("Optimization finished.")
print("Result:", result_inhibited)

# Get the fitted parameters
fitted_params_inhibited = result_inhibited.x
print("Fitted parameters (k1, Ki1, k2, k3, k4):", fitted_params_inhibited)

# Update the SBML model with fitted parameters
fitted_sbml_string_inhibited = update_sbml_params_inhibited(base_sbml_string_inhibited, fitted_params_inhibited)

# Store the fitted inhibited SBML model
shared_variables.add("fitted_sbml_model_inhibited", fitted_sbml_string_inhibited)

# Simulate the model with fitted parameters for both conditions and print comparison
print("\n--- Comparison with Fitted Inhibited Model ---")

# Condition 0 (Original)
print("\nCondition: Original Initial Concentrations")
sim_data_fitted_0 = simulate_with_ic(fitted_sbml_string_inhibited, experimental_conditions[0][2])
print("Simulation Data (first 10 rows):")
print(sim_data_fitted_0.head(10))
print("\nExperimental Data (first 10 rows):")
print(experimental_conditions[0][1][:10])
species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time']
sim_species_data_0 = sim_data_fitted_0[species_ids]
exp_species_data_0 = experimental_conditions[0][1]
exp_times_0 = experimental_conditions[0][0]
interp_sim_data_0 = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data_0)
for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
     interp_sim_data_0[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times_0, sim_data_fitted_0['Time'], sim_data_fitted_0[species_id])
sse_0 = np.sum((interp_sim_data_0 - exp_species_data_0)**2)
print(f"\nSum of Squared Errors for Condition 0: {sse_0}")


# Condition 3 (Perturbed)
print("\nCondition: Perturbed Initial Concentration (id_6m7j=0.5)")
sim_data_fitted_3 = simulate_with_ic(fitted_sbml_string_inhibited, experimental_conditions[1][2])
print("Simulation Data (first 10 rows):")
print(sim_data_fitted_3.head(10))
print("\nExperimental Data (first 10 rows):")
print(experimental_conditions[1][1][:10])
species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_3.columns if col != 'Time']
sim_species_data_3 = sim_data_fitted_3[species_ids]
exp_species_data_3 = experimental_conditions[1][1]
exp_times_3 = experimental_conditions[1][0]
interp_sim_data_3 = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data_3)
for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
     interp_sim_data_3[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times_3, sim_data_fitted_3['Time'], sim_data_fitted_3[species_id])
sse_3 = np.sum((interp_sim_data_3 - exp_species_data_3)**2)
print(f"\nSum of Squared Errors for Condition 3: {sse_3}")

print(f"\nTotal SSE for both conditions: {result_inhibited.fun}")
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Starting parameter fitting for inhibited model...
Optimization finished.
Result:   message: CONVERGENCE: RELATIVE REDUCTION OF F <= FACTR*EPSMCH
  success: True
   status: 0
      fun: 408.8211455548545
        x: [ 1.028e+00  3.981e+01  3.621e-01  4.984e-02  0.000e+00]
      nit: 42
      jac: [-3.601e-01 -2.422e-03 -1.765e+00  1.051e+00  1.580e+03]
     nfev: 384
     njev: 64
 hess_inv: <5x5 LbfgsInvHessProduct with dtype=float64>
Fitted parameters (k1, Ki1, k2, k3, k4): [ 1.0279469  39.80919614  0.36206206  0.04984062  0.        ]

--- Comparison with Fitted Inhibited Model ---

Condition: Original Initial Concentrations
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
        id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000e+00  0.000000  0.000000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  1.791199e-08  0.000060  0.018269  0.981671   0.0  0.018
2  1.423552e-07  0.000237  0.036076  0.963687   0.0  0.036
3  4.773100e-07  0.000529  0.053432  0.946039   0.0  0.054
4  1.124023e-06  0.000931  0.070345  0.928722   0.0  0.072
5  2.181050e-06  0.001443  0.086826  0.911729   0.0  0.090
6  3.744346e-06  0.002060  0.102883  0.895054   0.0  0.108
7  5.907305e-06  0.002779  0.118525  0.878690   0.0  0.126
8  8.760806e-06  0.003599  0.133761  0.862632   0.0  0.144
9  1.239328e-05  0.004515  0.148600  0.846872   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00]
 [1.16517089e-08 1.94283434e-05 5.40000000e-03]
 [9.31438640e-08 7.76667726e-05 1.08000000e-02]
 [3.14077875e-07 1.74645498e-04 1.61999998e-02]
 [7.43811263e-07 3.10294846e-04 2.15999993e-02]
 [1.45145327e-06 4.84545265e-04 2.69999977e-02]
 [2.50586020e-06 6.97327326e-04 3.23999944e-02]
 [3.97564015e-06 9.48571718e-04 3.77999878e-02]
 [5.92915431e-06 1.23820924e-03 4.31999763e-02]
 [8.43452078e-06 1.56617079e-03 4.85999570e-02]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 0: 304.66974795771506

Condition: Perturbed Initial Concentration (id_6m7j=0.5)
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
    id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000  0.000000  0.500000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  0.000001  0.003306  0.514797  0.981896   0.0  0.018
2  0.000006  0.006703  0.529165  0.964126   0.0  0.036
3  0.000014  0.010190  0.543114  0.946683   0.0  0.054
4  0.000024  0.013763  0.556651  0.929562   0.0  0.072
5  0.000038  0.017420  0.569786  0.912756   0.0  0.090
6  0.000056  0.021158  0.582528  0.896259   0.0  0.108
7  0.000076  0.024974  0.594885  0.880065   0.0  0.126
8  0.000100  0.028866  0.606865  0.864169   0.0  0.144
9  0.000128  0.032831  0.618477  0.848564   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00 5.00000000e-01]
 [3.24776542e-06 3.61619023e-03 5.05399969e-01]
 [1.30220734e-05 7.26472139e-03 5.10799746e-01]
 [2.93692965e-05 1.09455332e-02 5.16199135e-01]
 [5.23356030e-05 1.46585641e-02 5.21597929e-01]
 [8.19669833e-05 1.84037511e-02 5.26995917e-01]
 [1.18309231e-04 2.21810299e-02 5.32392877e-01]
 [1.61407931e-04 2.59903345e-02 5.37788583e-01]
 [2.11308467e-04 2.98315975e-02 5.43182798e-01]
 [2.68056015e-04 3.37047498e-02 5.48575279e-01]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 3: 104.15139759713949

Total SSE for both conditions: 408.8211455548545

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 12/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model_reversible, fitted_sbml_model_mm, fitted_sbml_model_inhibited)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 9
## Thoughts
The fitting for the model with `id_6m7j` product inhibition on its own production (Source -> `id_6m7j`) resulted in a total SSE of ~408.8. This is very close to the SSE (~408.6) obtained with the simple irreversible mass-action model. The fitted Ki1 value is very high (~39.8), which means the inhibition term `(1 + id_6m7j / Ki1)` is close to 1 for the concentration ranges observed in the experiments (max `id_6m7j` is around 1.2 in exp_0 and increases from 0.5 in exp_3). A high Ki indicates weak or negligible inhibition. Essentially, the optimizer found that the best fit is achieved when this inhibition is practically absent, making the rate law effectively `k1 * Source`, which is the same as the simple mass-action model for the first reaction.

The fitted parameters are: k1=1.028, Ki1=39.8, k2=0.362, k3=0.0498, k4=0.0. Again, k4 is zero. The values for k1, k2, k3 are very similar to those from the simple mass-action fit on both datasets.

This confirms that neither simple reversibility nor simple product inhibition of the first step by `id_6m7j` significantly improves the model's ability to fit both datasets compared to the basic irreversible linear mass-action model.

The persistent discrepancy in the perturbed experiment, particularly the initial increase of `id_6m7j` from 0.5, is still not explained. The simple mass-action model (k1*Source - k2*id_6m7j) predicts the rate of change of `id_6m7j`. If `id_6m7j` starts at 0.5, the rate is `k1*Source - k2*0.5`. With the fitted parameters (k1~1, k2~0.36, Source=1), this rate is `1*1 - 0.36*0.5 = 1 - 0.18 = 0.82`, which is positive, meaning `id_6m7j` should increase initially. This part of the simulation *is* consistent with the model structure. The issue is the *rate* of increase and the subsequent dynamics.

Let's look closer at the perturbed data (iteration_3). `id_6m7j` starts at 0.5 and increases to a peak around 1.05 before decreasing. `id_cue9` starts at 0 and increases, peaking around 1.4. `id_5mud` starts at 0 and increases continuously. This still strongly suggests a sequential process.

The failure of the simple models to capture the dynamics accurately, especially the relative timing and peak heights, might indicate that the rate constants are not truly constant or that there are other interactions.

Could there be a different type of regulation? What if `id_6m7j` production is activated by something? Or its consumption is inhibited?

Let's reconsider the possibility of a non-zero k4. In the original experiment, `id_5mud` seems to plateau. If k4 were non-zero, `id_5mud` would eventually decrease if its production rate dropped below its consumption rate. The plateau could be a balance between production and consumption, or simply reaching a steady state where the upstream species have also plateaued or declined.

Let's try one more structural modification based on the sequential nature and the persistent fitting issues: maybe the conversion rates are not simply proportional to the reactant concentration (mass action), but saturate at higher concentrations, as in Michaelis-Menten, but perhaps the previous MM formulation was incorrect or the initial guesses were poor. However, the previous MM fit was worse.

Let's go back to the best-fitting model so far: the irreversible linear mass-action chain with k4=0.
Source -> `id_6m7j` (rate = k1 * Source)
`id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9` (rate = k2 * id_6m7j)
`id_cue9` -> `id_5mud` (rate = k3 * id_cue9)
`id_5mud` -> Sink (rate = 0)

The fitted parameters from Iteration 6 (using both datasets) were k1=1.016, k2=0.362, k3=0.0498, k4=0.0. The total SSE was ~408.6.

Let's try one more perturbation experiment to see if it reveals anything new. Perturbing `id_cue9` might help distinguish between models where `id_cue9` production depends only on `id_6m7j` vs. models with feedback or other complexities involving `id_cue9`.

I will change the initial concentration of `id_cue9` to 0.5, keeping others at 0.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
    "action": "change_initial_concentration",
    "meta_data": {
        "id_cue9": 0.5
    }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_9
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_9]

Total size: 1001 rows × 4 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_9] for the full data

Time   id_5mud  id_cue9  id_6m7j
0         0 5.00e-01        0
...
3.60e-01  1.75e-02 4.90e-01 1.07e-01
...
7.20e-01  3.42e-02 4.95e-01 2.10e-01
...
1.08e+00  5.08e-02 5.14e-01 3.06e-01
...
1.44e+00  6.77e-02 5.46e-01 3.90e-01
...
1.80e+00  8.53e-02 5.87e-01 4.60e-01
...
2.16e+00  1.04e-01 6.35e-01 5.15e-01
...
2.52e+00  1.24e-01 6.88e-01 5.53e-01
...
2.88e+00  1.45e-01 7.44e-01 5.73e-01
...
3.24e+00  1.67e-01 7.99e-01 5.78e-01
...
3.60e+00  1.90e-01 8.52e-01 5.68e-01
...
3.96e+00  2.14e-01 9.01e-01 5.46e-01
...
4.32e+00  2.39e-01 9.44e-01 5.15e-01
...
4.68e+00  2.65e-01 9.81e-01 4.79e-01
...
5.04e+00  2.91e-01 1.01e+00 4.40e-01
...
5.40e+00  3.17e-01 1.03e+00 4.01e-01
...
5.76e+00  3.42e-01 1.05e+00 3.64e-01
...
6.12e+00  3.68e-01 1.06e+00 3.30e-01
...
6.48e+00  3.93e-01 1.07e+00 3.00e-01
...
6.84e+00  4.17e-01 1.07e+00 2.75e-01
...
7.20e+00  4.40e-01 1.07e+00 2.53e-01
...
7.56e+00  4.62e-01 1.07e+00 2.34e-01
...
7.92e+00  4.84e-01 1.06e+00 2.19e-01
...
8.28e+00  5.04e-01 1.06e+00 2.06e-01
...
8.64e+00  5.23e-01 1.05e+00 1.95e-01
...
9.00e+00  5.42e-01 1.04e+00 1.86e-01
...
9.36e+00  5.59e-01 1.03e+00 1.79e-01
...
9.72e+00  5.75e-01 1.01e+00 1.72e-01
...
1.01e+01  5.91e-01 1.00e+00 1.66e-01
...
1.04e+01  6.05e-01 9.91e-01 1.62e-01
...
1.08e+01  6.18e-01 9.78e-01 1.57e-01
...
1.12e+01  6.31e-01 9.65e-01 1.53e-01
...
1.15e+01  6.43e-01 9.53e-01 1.50e-01
...
1.19e+01  6.53e-01 9.40e-01 1.47e-01
...
1.22e+01  6.63e-01 9.28e-01 1.45e-01
...
1.26e+01  6.72e-01 9.15e-01 1.42e-01
...
1.30e+01  6.81e-01 9.03e-01 1.40e-01
...
1.33e+01  6.88e-01 8.90e-01 1.38e-01
...
1.37e+01  6.95e-01 8.78e-01 1.37e-01
...
1.40e+01  7.01e-01 8.67e-01 1.35e-01
...
1.44e+01  7.07e-01 8.55e-01 1.34e-01
...
1.48e+01  7.12e-01 8.44e-01 1.33e-01
...
1.51e+01  7.17e-01 8.32e-01 1.32e-01
...
1.55e+01  7.21e-01 8.22e-01 1.31e-01
...
1.58e+01  7.24e-01 8.11e-01 1.30e-01
...
1.62e+01  7.27e-01 8.01e-01 1.30e-01
...
1.66e+01  7.29e-01 7.91e-01 1.29e-01
...
1.69e+01  7.31e-01 7.81e-01 1.29e-01
...
1.73e+01  7.33e-01 7.72e-01 1.28e-01
...
1.80e+01  7.35e-01 7.54e-01 1.28e-01

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 11/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_9)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model_reversible, fitted_sbml_model_mm, fitted_sbml_model_inhibited)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 10
## Thoughts
The new experiment (iteration_9) with `id_cue9` starting at 0.5 provides another dataset to test the model. I will now fit the simple irreversible mass-action model (Source -> `id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9` -> `id_5mud` with k4=0) to all three experimental datasets (`iteration_0`, `iteration_3`, and `iteration_9`).

Fitting to more diverse data should ideally yield parameters that are more robust and a model that generalizes better. If this model still fails to capture the dynamics across all three conditions, it strongly suggests that the simple linear irreversible mass-action structure is fundamentally missing some key biological mechanism.

The experimental conditions for fitting will now be:
1.  `iteration_0`: IC = {`id_5mud`: 0, `id_cue9`: 0, `id_6m7j`: 0}
2.  `iteration_3`: IC = {`id_5mud`: 0, `id_cue9`: 0, `id_6m7j`: 0.5}
3.  `iteration_9`: IC = {`id_5mud`: 0, `id_cue9`: 0.5, `id_6m7j`: 0}

I will use the same fitting code as before, but update the `experimental_conditions` list to include the new data. The model structure will be the basic irreversible mass-action chain.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import minimize

# Access the experimental data from all three iterations
exp_data_0 = experiment_history['iteration_0']
exp_data_3 = experiment_history['iteration_3']
exp_data_9 = experiment_history['iteration_9']


# Combine experimental data and create a list of (time, species_data, initial_conditions) tuples
experimental_conditions = [
    (exp_data_0['Time'].values, exp_data_0[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}),
    (exp_data_3['Time'].values, exp_data_3[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.5}),
    (exp_data_9['Time'].values, exp_data_9[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.5, 'id_6m7j': 0.0})
]

# Load the initial SBML model structure
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add 'Source' (constant species) and 'Sink' (boundary species) if not already present
if not model.getSpecies("Source"):
    source_species = model.createSpecies()
    source_species.setId("Source")
    source_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    source_species.setInitialConcentration(1.0)
    source_species.setConstant(True)

if not model.getSpecies("Sink"):
    sink_species = model.createSpecies()
    sink_species.setId("Sink")
    sink_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    sink_species.setInitialConcentration(0.0)
    sink_species.setBoundaryCondition(True)

# Remove existing reactions if any
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add parameters for rate constants (k1, k2, k3, k4)
param_ids = ["k1", "k2", "k3", "k4"]
# Initial guesses - use values from previous fit on 2 datasets
initial_param_values = {
    "k1": 1.016,
    "k2": 0.362,
    "k3": 0.0498,
    "k4": 0.0
}

for param_id, value in initial_param_values.items():
    if not model.getParameter(param_id):
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(param_id)
        p.setValue(value)
        p.setConstant(True)

# Add Reaction 1: Source -> id_6m7j (Mass Action)
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("reaction1_Source_to_6m7j")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
r1_reactant = reaction1.createReactant()
r1_reactant.setSpecies("Source")
r1_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r1_product = reaction1.createProduct()
r1_product.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r1_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law1.setFormula("k1 * Source")

# Add Reaction 2: id_6m7j -> id_cue9 (Mass Action)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("reaction2_6m7j_to_cue9")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
r2_reactant = reaction2.createReactant()
r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r2_product = reaction2.createProduct()
r2_product.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r2_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law2.setFormula("k2 * id_6m7j")

# Add Reaction 3: id_cue9 -> id_5mud (Mass Action)
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("reaction3_cue9_to_5mud")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
r3_reactant = reaction3.createReactant()
r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r3_product = reaction3.createProduct()
r3_product.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r3_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law3.setFormula("k3 * id_cue9")

# Add Reaction 4: id_5mud -> Sink (Mass Action)
reaction4 = model.createReaction()
reaction4.setId("reaction4_5mud_to_Sink")
reaction4.setReversible(False)
r4_reactant = reaction4.createReactant()
r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r4_product = reaction4.createProduct()
r4_product.setSpecies("Sink")
r4_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law4 = reaction4.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law4.setFormula("k4 * id_5mud")


# Get the base SBML string
base_sbml_string_massaction = libsbml.SBMLWriter().writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

def update_sbml_params_massaction(sbml_string, params):
    """Updates parameter values in an SBML string."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()
    param_ids = ["k1", "k2", "k3", "k4"]
    for i, param_id in enumerate(param_ids):
        p = model.getParameter(param_id)
        if p:
            p.setValue(params[i])
        else:
            print(f"Warning: Parameter {param_id} not found.")
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    return writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

def simulate_with_ic(sbml_string, initial_conditions):
    """Simulates an SBML model with specified initial concentrations."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()

    for species_id, conc in initial_conditions.items():
        species = model.getSpecies(species_id)
        if species:
            species.setInitialConcentration(conc)
        else:
             print(f"Warning: Species {species_id} not found for IC change.")

    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    sim_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

    sim_data = simulate(sim_sbml)
    return sim_data


def objective_function_massaction(params, base_sbml_string, experimental_conditions):
    """Calculates the sum of squared errors for multiple experimental conditions."""
    try:
        # Ensure parameters are non-negative
        if any(p < 0 for p in params):
            return np.inf

        # Update the base SBML model with current parameters
        updated_sbml = update_sbml_params_massaction(base_sbml_string, params)

        total_sse = 0
        for exp_times, exp_species_data, initial_conditions in experimental_conditions:
            # Simulate the model with specific initial conditions
            sim_data = simulate_with_ic(updated_sbml, initial_conditions)

            if sim_data is None or sim_data.empty or 'Time' not in sim_data.columns:
                 print("Simulation failed or returned empty data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf

            if sim_data['Time'].iloc[-1] < exp_times[-1]:
                 print("Simulation time range is shorter than experimental data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf

            # Use columns from one exp_data to get species IDs
            species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time']
            sim_species_data = sim_data[species_ids]

            interp_sim_data = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data)
            for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
                 interp_sim_data[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times, sim_data['Time'], sim_data[species_id])

            sse = np.sum((interp_sim_data - exp_species_data)**2)
            total_sse += sse

        return total_sse

    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error during objective function evaluation: {e}")
        return np.inf


# Initial guess for parameters (k1, k2, k3, k4)
initial_params_massaction = [initial_param_values[id] for id in param_ids]

# Parameter bounds (non-negative)
bounds_massaction = [(0, None), (0, None), (0, None), (0, None)]

# Perform optimization
print("Starting parameter fitting for mass-action model with 3 conditions...")
result_massaction = minimize(objective_function_massaction, initial_params_massaction, args=(base_sbml_string_massaction, experimental_conditions), method='L-BFGS-B', bounds=bounds_massaction)

print("Optimization finished.")
print("Result:", result_massaction)

# Get the fitted parameters
fitted_params_massaction = result_massaction.x
print("Fitted parameters (k1, k2, k3, k4):", fitted_params_massaction)

# Update the SBML model with fitted parameters
fitted_sbml_string_massaction = update_sbml_params_massaction(base_sbml_string_massaction, fitted_params_massaction)

# Store the fitted mass-action SBML model
shared_variables.add("fitted_sbml_model_massaction_3cond", fitted_sbml_string_massaction)

# Simulate the model with fitted parameters for all conditions and print comparison
print("\n--- Comparison with Fitted Mass-Action Model (3 conditions) ---")

for i, (exp_times, exp_species_data, initial_conditions) in enumerate(experimental_conditions):
    print(f"\nCondition {i}: Initial Concentrations {initial_conditions}")
    sim_data_fitted = simulate_with_ic(fitted_sbml_string_massaction, initial_conditions)
    print("Simulation Data (first 10 rows):")
    print(sim_data_fitted.head(10))
    print("\nExperimental Data (first 10 rows):")
    print(exp_species_data[:10])

    species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time']
    sim_species_data = sim_data_fitted[species_ids]
    interp_sim_data = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data)
    for j, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
         interp_sim_data[:, j] = np.interp(exp_times, sim_data_fitted['Time'], sim_data_fitted[species_id])
    sse = np.sum((interp_sim_data - exp_species_data)**2)
    print(f"\nSum of Squared Errors for Condition {i}: {sse}")

print(f"\nTotal SSE for all conditions: {result_massaction.fun}")
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Starting parameter fitting for mass-action model with 3 conditions...
Optimization finished.
Result:   message: CONVERGENCE: RELATIVE REDUCTION OF F <= FACTR*EPSMCH
  success: True
   status: 0
      fun: 437.60988234066
        x: [ 9.174e-01  3.453e-01  5.182e-02  0.000e+00]
      nit: 20
      jac: [ 2.649e-03 -4.036e-04  1.256e-03  1.687e+03]
     nfev: 175
     njev: 35
 hess_inv: <4x4 LbfgsInvHessProduct with dtype=float64>
Fitted parameters (k1, k2, k3, k4): [0.91741414 0.34531028 0.05182491 0.        ]

--- Comparison with Fitted Mass-Action Model (3 conditions) ---

Condition 0: Initial Concentrations {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
        id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000e+00  0.000000  0.000000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  1.586289e-08  0.000051  0.016327  0.983622   0.0  0.018
2  1.261595e-07  0.000202  0.032285  0.967513   0.0  0.036
3  4.232993e-07  0.000451  0.047882  0.951667   0.0  0.054
4  9.974953e-07  0.000796  0.063123  0.936080   0.0  0.072
5  1.936825e-06  0.001234  0.078015  0.920749   0.0  0.090
6  3.327258e-06  0.001762  0.092565  0.905670   0.0  0.108
7  5.252699e-06  0.002380  0.106778  0.890837   0.0  0.126
8  7.795033e-06  0.003085  0.120661  0.876247   0.0  0.144
9  1.103414e-05  0.003874  0.134220  0.861896   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00]
 [1.16517089e-08 1.94283434e-05 5.40000000e-03]
 [9.31438640e-08 7.76667726e-05 1.08000000e-02]
 [3.14077875e-07 1.74645498e-04 1.61999998e-02]
 [7.43811263e-07 3.10294846e-04 2.15999993e-02]
 [1.45145327e-06 4.84545265e-04 2.69999977e-02]
 [2.50586020e-06 6.97327326e-04 3.23999944e-02]
 [3.97564015e-06 9.48571718e-04 3.77999878e-02]
 [5.92915431e-06 1.23820924e-03 4.31999763e-02]
 [8.43452078e-06 1.56617079e-03 4.85999570e-02]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 0: 305.26381257338414

Condition 1: Initial Concentrations {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.5}
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
    id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000  0.000000  0.500000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  0.000001  0.003148  0.513229  0.983622   0.0  0.018
2  0.000006  0.006373  0.526108  0.967513   0.0  0.036
3  0.000013  0.009675  0.538645  0.951667   0.0  0.054
4  0.000024  0.013051  0.550845  0.936080   0.0  0.072
5  0.000038  0.016498  0.562715  0.920749   0.0  0.090
6  0.000055  0.020014  0.574261  0.905670   0.0  0.108
7  0.000075  0.023598  0.585490  0.890837   0.0  0.126
8  0.000099  0.027248  0.596407  0.876247   0.0  0.144
9  0.000126  0.030961  0.607017  0.861896   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00 5.00000000e-01]
 [3.24776542e-06 3.61619023e-03 5.05399969e-01]
 [1.30220734e-05 7.26472139e-03 5.10799746e-01]
 [2.93692965e-05 1.09455332e-02 5.16199135e-01]
 [5.23356030e-05 1.46585641e-02 5.21597929e-01]
 [8.19669833e-05 1.84037511e-02 5.26995917e-01]
 [1.18309231e-04 2.21810299e-02 5.32392877e-01]
 [1.61407931e-04 2.59903345e-02 5.37788583e-01]
 [2.11308467e-04 2.98315975e-02 5.43182798e-01]
 [2.68056015e-04 3.37047498e-02 5.48575279e-01]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 1: 105.43513441884505

Condition 2: Initial Concentrations {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.5, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
    id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000  0.500000  0.000000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  0.000466  0.499585  0.016327  0.983622   0.0  0.018
2  0.000932  0.499270  0.032285  0.967513   0.0  0.036
3  0.001398  0.499054  0.047882  0.951667   0.0  0.054
4  0.001863  0.498934  0.063123  0.936081   0.0  0.072
5  0.002329  0.498907  0.078015  0.920750   0.0  0.090
6  0.002794  0.498972  0.092564  0.905670   0.0  0.108
7  0.003260  0.499126  0.106777  0.890837   0.0  0.126
8  0.003725  0.499367  0.120661  0.876247   0.0  0.144
9  0.004191  0.499694  0.134219  0.861896   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.         0.5        0.        ]
 [0.00089839 0.49912024 0.00539991]
 [0.00179362 0.4982809  0.01079926]
 [0.00268577 0.49748191 0.0161975 ]
 [0.00357492 0.49672317 0.02159407]
 [0.00446113 0.49600462 0.02698843]
 [0.0053445  0.49532615 0.03238003]
 [0.00622509 0.49468767 0.03776832]
 [0.00710299 0.49408909 0.04315278]
 [0.00797826 0.4935303  0.04853285]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 2: 26.91093534843083

Total SSE for all conditions: 437.60988234066

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 10/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_9)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model_reversible, fitted_sbml_model_mm, fitted_sbml_model_inhibited, fitted_sbml_model_massaction_3cond)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 11
## Thoughts
The parameter fitting for the simple irreversible mass-action model using all three experimental conditions resulted in a total SSE of ~437.6. The fitted parameters are k1=0.917, k2=0.345, k3=0.0518, and k4=0.0. Again, k4 is zero, reinforcing the idea that `id_5mud` is not consumed by a simple mass-action sink.

Let's look at the SSE for each condition:
- Condition 0 (Original): SSE ~305. This is similar to previous fits on this data alone.
- Condition 1 (id_6m7j=0.5): SSE ~105. This is similar to the SSE from the previous fits on this data.
- Condition 2 (id_cue9=0.5): SSE ~26.9. This is a relatively low SSE for this condition, suggesting the model fits this specific perturbation reasonably well.

The total SSE (~437.6) is higher than the SSE from fitting the simple mass-action model to only two conditions (~408.6). This is expected when adding more data that the model doesn't perfectly fit; the optimizer finds a compromise.

The simple irreversible linear mass-action model with k4=0 seems to be the most consistent model found so far, despite its limitations. The fitted parameters are relatively stable across different fitting attempts.

Let's analyze the fit quality visually by looking at the first 10 rows again.
- **Condition 0:** The simulation captures the initial rise but seems to slightly underestimate the early concentrations of `id_6m7j` and `id_cue9` compared to the experiment.
- **Condition 1 (id_6m7j=0.5):** The simulation shows `id_6m7j` increasing from 0.5, but the experimental data shows it increasing faster initially. The simulation also seems to underestimate the early production of `id_cue9` and `id_5mud`.
- **Condition 2 (id_cue9=0.5):** The simulation shows `id_cue9` decreasing slightly initially (due to conversion to `id_5mud` and no initial production from `id_6m7j`), while the experiment shows `id_cue9` staying relatively flat or slightly decreasing initially before increasing. The simulation shows `id_6m7j` increasing from 0, and `id_5mud` increasing from 0, which is qualitatively correct, but the rates might be off.

The model struggles most with the initial dynamics when a species starts at a non-zero concentration, particularly `id_6m7j`. The discrepancy in the `id_6m7j=0.5` experiment is still the most prominent issue.

Could there be an issue with the 'Source' reaction? Is it truly constant rate (k1*Source)? Or does it depend on something else? The fact that `id_6m7j` production seems slower than predicted when `id_6m7j` is already high (in exp_3) still points towards some form of regulation or non-mass-action behavior in the first step, even if the simple inhibition model didn't fit well.

Let's consider the possibility that the 'Source' reaction rate is not constant but perhaps limited, like a Michaelis-Menten type production from the 'Source'. Rate = `Vmax1 * Source / (Km1 + Source)`. Since 'Source' is constant at 1.0, this simplifies to a constant rate `Vmax1 * 1.0 / (Km1 + 1.0)`. This is equivalent to a simple mass-action rate `k1 * Source` where `k1 = Vmax1 / (Km1 + 1.0)`. So, changing the 'Source' reaction to MM kinetics with a constant 'Source' species doesn't add new behavior, just redefines k1.

What if the 'Source' reaction is inhibited by `id_6m7j` but with a different kinetic form, or a higher Hill coefficient? Or inhibited by `id_cue9` or `id_5mud`?

Let's try inhibiting the first reaction (Source -> `id_6m7j`) by `id_cue9`. Rate = `k1 * Source / (1 + id_cue9/Ki_cue9)`. This adds one parameter, Ki_cue9.

Model structure:
Reaction 1: Source -> `id_6m7j` (Inhibited Mass Action by id_cue9: k1 * Source / (1 + id_cue9/Ki_cue9))
Reaction 2: `id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9` (Mass Action: k2 * id_6m7j)
Reaction 3: `id_cue9` -> `id_5mud` (Mass Action: k3 * id_cue9)
Reaction 4: `id_5mud` -> Sink (Mass Action: k4 * id_5mud) - keep k4=0 initially.

This model has 5 parameters: k1, Ki_cue9, k2, k3, k4. I will fit these parameters using all three experimental datasets.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import minimize

# Access the experimental data from all three iterations
exp_data_0 = experiment_history['iteration_0']
exp_data_3 = experiment_history['iteration_3']
exp_data_9 = experiment_history['iteration_9']

# Combine experimental data and create a list of (time, species_data, initial_conditions) tuples
experimental_conditions = [
    (exp_data_0['Time'].values, exp_data_0[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}),
    (exp_data_3['Time'].values, exp_data_3[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.5}),
    (exp_data_9['Time'].values, exp_data_9[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.5, 'id_6m7j': 0.0})
]

# Load the initial SBML model structure
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add 'Source' (constant species) and 'Sink' (boundary species) if not already present
if not model.getSpecies("Source"):
    source_species = model.createSpecies()
    source_species.setId("Source")
    source_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    source_species.setInitialConcentration(1.0)
    source_species.setConstant(True)

if not model.getSpecies("Sink"):
    sink_species = model.createSpecies()
    sink_species.setId("Sink")
    sink_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    sink_species.setInitialConcentration(0.0)
    sink_species.setBoundaryCondition(True)

# Remove existing reactions if any
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add parameters for rate constants (k1, Ki_cue9, k2, k3, k4)
param_ids = ["k1", "Ki_cue9", "k2", "k3", "k4"]
# Initial guesses - k1, k2, k3 from previous mass-action fit, k4=0, Ki_cue9 needs guess
# Max concentration of id_cue9 is around 1.4 in exp_0 and 1.4 in exp_3.
# Let's guess Ki_cue9 around 0.5 or 1.0
initial_param_values = {
    "k1": 0.917,   # From previous fit
    "Ki_cue9": 0.5,  # Guess for inhibition constant
    "k2": 0.345,  # From previous fit
    "k3": 0.0518,  # From previous fit
    "k4": 0.0    # From previous fit
}

for param_id, value in initial_param_values.items():
    if not model.getParameter(param_id):
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(param_id)
        p.setValue(value)
        p.setConstant(True)

# Add Reaction 1: Source -> id_6m7j (Inhibited Mass Action by id_cue9)
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("reaction1_Source_to_6m7j")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
r1_reactant = reaction1.createReactant()
r1_reactant.setSpecies("Source")
r1_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r1_product = reaction1.createProduct()
r1_product.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r1_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
# Rate = k1 * Source / (1 + id_cue9/Ki_cue9)
kinetic_law1.setFormula("(k1 * Source) / (1 + id_cue9 / Ki_cue9)")

# Add Reaction 2: id_6m7j -> id_cue9 (Mass Action)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("reaction2_6m7j_to_cue9")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
r2_reactant = reaction2.createReactant()
r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r2_product = reaction2.createProduct()
r2_product.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r2_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law2.setFormula("k2 * id_6m7j")

# Add Reaction 3: id_cue9 -> id_5mud (Mass Action)
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("reaction3_cue9_to_5mud")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
r3_reactant = reaction3.createReactant()
r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r3_product = reaction3.createProduct()
r3_product.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r3_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law3.setFormula("k3 * id_cue9")

# Add Reaction 4: id_5mud -> Sink (Mass Action)
reaction4 = model.createReaction()
reaction4.setId("reaction4_5mud_to_Sink")
reaction4.setReversible(False)
r4_reactant = reaction4.createReactant()
r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r4_product = reaction4.createProduct()
r4_product.setSpecies("Sink")
r4_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law4 = reaction4.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law4.setFormula("k4 * id_5mud")


# Get the base SBML string with inhibited kinetics
base_sbml_string_inhibited_cue9 = libsbml.SBMLWriter().writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

def update_sbml_params_inhibited_cue9(sbml_string, params):
    """Updates parameter values in an SBML string for the inhibited model."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()
    param_ids = ["k1", "Ki_cue9", "k2", "k3", "k4"]
    for i, param_id in enumerate(param_ids):
        p = model.getParameter(param_id)
        if p:
            p.setValue(params[i])
        else:
            print(f"Warning: Parameter {param_id} not found.")
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    return writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

def simulate_with_ic(sbml_string, initial_conditions):
    """Simulates an SBML model with specified initial concentrations."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()

    for species_id, conc in initial_conditions.items():
        species = model.getSpecies(species_id)
        if species:
            species.setInitialConcentration(conc)
        else:
             print(f"Warning: Species {species_id} not found for IC change.")

    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    sim_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

    sim_data = simulate(sim_sbml)
    return sim_data


def objective_function_inhibited_cue9(params, base_sbml_string, experimental_conditions):
    """Calculates the sum of squared errors for multiple experimental conditions."""
    try:
        # Ensure parameters are non-negative (Ki must be > 0)
        if any(p < 0 for p in params) or params[1] <= 0: # Ki_cue9 must be > 0
            return np.inf

        # Update the base SBML model with current parameters
        updated_sbml = update_sbml_params_inhibited_cue9(base_sbml_string, params)

        total_sse = 0
        for exp_times, exp_species_data, initial_conditions in experimental_conditions:
            # Simulate the model with specific initial conditions
            sim_data = simulate_with_ic(updated_sbml, initial_conditions)

            if sim_data is None or sim_data.empty or 'Time' not in sim_data.columns:
                 print("Simulation failed or returned empty data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf

            if sim_data['Time'].iloc[-1] < exp_times[-1]:
                 print("Simulation time range is shorter than experimental data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf

            species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time']
            sim_species_data = sim_data[species_ids]

            interp_sim_data = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data)
            for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
                 interp_sim_data[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times, sim_data['Time'], sim_data[species_id])

            sse = np.sum((interp_sim_data - exp_species_data)**2)
            total_sse += sse

        return total_sse

    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error during objective function evaluation: {e}")
        return np.inf


# Initial guess for parameters (k1, Ki_cue9, k2, k3, k4)
initial_params_inhibited_cue9 = [initial_param_values[id] for id in param_ids]

# Parameter bounds (non-negative, Ki > 0)
bounds_inhibited_cue9 = [(0, None), (1e-6, None), (0, None), (0, None), (0, None)] # Ki_cue9 bound > 0

# Perform optimization
print("Starting parameter fitting for cue9 inhibited model with 3 conditions...")
result_inhibited_cue9 = minimize(objective_function_inhibited_cue9, initial_params_inhibited_cue9, args=(base_sbml_string_inhibited_cue9, experimental_conditions), method='L-BFGS-B', bounds=bounds_inhibited_cue9)

print("Optimization finished.")
print("Result:", result_inhibited_cue9)

# Get the fitted parameters
fitted_params_inhibited_cue9 = result_inhibited_cue9.x
print("Fitted parameters (k1, Ki_cue9, k2, k3, k4):", fitted_params_inhibited_cue9)

# Update the SBML model with fitted parameters
fitted_sbml_string_inhibited_cue9 = update_sbml_params_inhibited_cue9(base_sbml_string_inhibited_cue9, fitted_params_inhibited_cue9)

# Store the fitted inhibited SBML model
shared_variables.add("fitted_sbml_model_inhibited_cue9", fitted_sbml_string_inhibited_cue9)

# Simulate the model with fitted parameters for all conditions and print comparison
print("\n--- Comparison with Fitted cue9 Inhibited Model (3 conditions) ---")

for i, (exp_times, exp_species_data, initial_conditions) in enumerate(experimental_conditions):
    print(f"\nCondition {i}: Initial Concentrations {initial_conditions}")
    sim_data_fitted = simulate_with_ic(fitted_sbml_string_inhibited_cue9, initial_conditions)
    print("Simulation Data (first 10 rows):")
    print(sim_data_fitted.head(10))
    print("\nExperimental Data (first 10 rows):")
    print(exp_species_data[:10])

    species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time']
    sim_species_data = sim_data_fitted[species_ids]
    interp_sim_data = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data)
    for j, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
         interp_sim_data[:, j] = np.interp(exp_times, sim_data_fitted['Time'], sim_data_fitted[species_id])
    sse = np.sum((interp_sim_data - exp_species_data)**2)
    print(f"\nSum of Squared Errors for Condition {i}: {sse}")

print(f"\nTotal SSE for all conditions: {result_inhibited_cue9.fun}")
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Starting parameter fitting for cue9 inhibited model with 3 conditions...
Optimization finished.
Result:   message: CONVERGENCE: RELATIVE REDUCTION OF F <= FACTR*EPSMCH
  success: True
   status: 0
      fun: 438.90540430236894
        x: [ 1.018e+00  3.208e+00  3.423e-01  5.182e-02  0.000e+00]
      nit: 45
      jac: [ 1.123e-01 -4.341e-01  9.327e-01  2.394e+00  1.706e+03]
     nfev: 900
     njev: 150
 hess_inv: <5x5 LbfgsInvHessProduct with dtype=float64>
Fitted parameters (k1, Ki_cue9, k2, k3, k4): [1.01792086 3.20817596 0.34229718 0.05181906 0.        ]

--- Comparison with Fitted cue9 Inhibited Model (3 conditions) ---

Condition 0: Initial Concentrations {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
        id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000e+00  0.000000  0.000000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  1.743885e-08  0.000056  0.018100  0.981844   0.0  0.018
2  1.386266e-07  0.000222  0.035759  0.964019   0.0  0.036
3  4.649132e-07  0.000495  0.052986  0.946518   0.0  0.054
4  1.095075e-06  0.000873  0.069789  0.929337   0.0  0.072
5  2.125337e-06  0.001353  0.086175  0.912470   0.0  0.090
6  3.649455e-06  0.001932  0.102153  0.895912   0.0  0.108
7  5.758764e-06  0.002607  0.117730  0.879657   0.0  0.126
8  8.542205e-06  0.003377  0.132914  0.863701   0.0  0.144
9  1.208637e-05  0.004238  0.147712  0.848039   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00]
 [1.16517089e-08 1.94283434e-05 5.40000000e-03]
 [9.31438640e-08 7.76667726e-05 1.08000000e-02]
 [3.14077875e-07 1.74645498e-04 1.61999998e-02]
 [7.43811263e-07 3.10294846e-04 2.15999993e-02]
 [1.45145327e-06 4.84545265e-04 2.69999977e-02]
 [2.50586020e-06 6.97327326e-04 3.23999944e-02]
 [3.97564015e-06 9.48571718e-04 3.77999878e-02]
 [5.92915431e-06 1.23820924e-03 4.31999763e-02]
 [8.43452078e-06 1.56617079e-03 4.85999570e-02]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 0: 306.7742479487034

Condition 1: Initial Concentrations {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.5}
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
    id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000  0.000000  0.500000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  0.000001  0.003126  0.515020  0.981853   0.0  0.018
2  0.000006  0.006340  0.529602  0.964053   0.0  0.036
3  0.000013  0.009639  0.543755  0.946593   0.0  0.054
4  0.000024  0.013021  0.557488  0.929466   0.0  0.072
5  0.000038  0.016484  0.570811  0.912668   0.0  0.090
6  0.000055  0.020024  0.583731  0.896191   0.0  0.108
7  0.000075  0.023639  0.596258  0.880028   0.0  0.126
8  0.000099  0.027326  0.608399  0.864176   0.0  0.144
9  0.000126  0.031084  0.620164  0.848626   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00 5.00000000e-01]
 [3.24776542e-06 3.61619023e-03 5.05399969e-01]
 [1.30220734e-05 7.26472139e-03 5.10799746e-01]
 [2.93692965e-05 1.09455332e-02 5.16199135e-01]
 [5.23356030e-05 1.46585641e-02 5.21597929e-01]
 [8.19669833e-05 1.84037511e-02 5.26995917e-01]
 [1.18309231e-04 2.21810299e-02 5.32392877e-01]
 [1.61407931e-04 2.59903345e-02 5.37788583e-01]
 [2.11308467e-04 2.98315975e-02 5.43182798e-01]
 [2.68056015e-04 3.37047498e-02 5.48575279e-01]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 1: 106.34283013742805

Condition 2: Initial Concentrations {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.5, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
    id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000  0.500000  0.000000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  0.000466  0.499582  0.015679  0.984272   0.0  0.018
2  0.000932  0.499261  0.031018  0.968790   0.0  0.036
3  0.001398  0.499032  0.046020  0.953550   0.0  0.054
4  0.001863  0.498896  0.060691  0.938550   0.0  0.072
5  0.002328  0.498849  0.075038  0.923785   0.0  0.090
6  0.002794  0.498890  0.089065  0.909252   0.0  0.108
7  0.003259  0.499015  0.102778  0.894948   0.0  0.126
8  0.003725  0.499224  0.116181  0.880870   0.0  0.144
9  0.004190  0.499515  0.129281  0.867014   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.         0.5        0.        ]
 [0.00089839 0.49912024 0.00539991]
 [0.00179362 0.4982809  0.01079926]
 [0.00268577 0.49748191 0.0161975 ]
 [0.00357492 0.49672317 0.02159407]
 [0.00446113 0.49600462 0.02698843]
 [0.0053445  0.49532615 0.03238003]
 [0.00622509 0.49468767 0.03776832]
 [0.00710299 0.49408909 0.04315278]
 [0.00797826 0.4935303  0.04853285]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 2: 25.78832621623747

Total SSE for all conditions: 438.90540430236894

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 9/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_9)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model_reversible, fitted_sbml_model_mm, fitted_sbml_model_inhibited, fitted_sbml_model_massaction_3cond, fitted_sbml_model_inhibited_cue9)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 12
## Thoughts
The fitting for the model with `id_cue9` inhibition on the first reaction (Source -> `id_6m7j`) using all three datasets resulted in a total SSE of ~438.9. This is very similar to the SSE (~437.6) from the simple mass-action model fitted to the same data. The fitted Ki_cue9 value is ~3.2, which is relatively high compared to the concentrations of `id_cue9` observed (max ~1.4). This suggests the inhibition by `id_cue9` is also weak or negligible in the optimal fit, making the rate law for the first reaction close to `k1 * Source`.

The fitted parameters are: k1=1.018, Ki_cue9=3.208, k2=0.342, k3=0.0518, k4=0.0. Again, k4 is zero. The values for k1, k2, k3 are very similar to those from the simple mass-action fit on all three datasets.

The SSEs for individual conditions are also similar:
- Condition 0: SSE ~306.7 (vs ~305.2 for simple MA)
- Condition 1 (id_6m7j=0.5): SSE ~106.3 (vs ~105.4 for simple MA)
- Condition 2 (id_cue9=0.5): SSE ~25.7 (vs ~26.9 for simple MA)

Neither `id_6m7j` self-inhibition nor `id_cue9` inhibition on the first step significantly improved the overall fit compared to the simple irreversible mass-action model. The simple mass-action model (Source -> `id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9` -> `id_5mud` with k4=0) remains the best-performing model found so far, based on the total SSE across all three conditions.

The persistent discrepancy, particularly in the `id_6m7j=0.5` experiment, where the simulated `id_6m7j` increases faster initially than the experimental data, is still the main challenge.

Let's consider the possibility that the issue is not with the *production* of `id_6m7j`, but its *consumption* (conversion to `id_cue9`). The rate is currently `k2 * id_6m7j`. If this rate saturated at higher `id_6m7j` concentrations (Michaelis-Menten), it would mean the consumption rate doesn't increase proportionally with `id_6m7j` when `id_6m7j` is high. This could potentially explain why `id_6m7j` accumulates more than predicted in the perturbed experiment.

Let's try the simple irreversible linear chain model again, but this time use Michaelis-Menten kinetics for the second reaction (`id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9`).

Model structure:
Reaction 1: Source -> `id_6m7j` (Mass Action: k1 * Source)
Reaction 2: `id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9` (Michaelis-Menten: Vmax2 * [id_6m7j] / (Km2 + [id_6m7j]))
Reaction 3: `id_cue9` -> `id_5mud` (Mass Action: k3 * id_cue9)
Reaction 4: `id_5mud` -> Sink (Mass Action: k4 * id_5mud) - keep k4=0 initially.

This model has 5 parameters: k1, Vmax2, Km2, k3, k4. I will fit these parameters using all three experimental datasets.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import minimize

# Access the experimental data from all three iterations
exp_data_0 = experiment_history['iteration_0']
exp_data_3 = experiment_history['iteration_3']
exp_data_9 = experiment_history['iteration_9']

# Combine experimental data and create a list of (time, species_data, initial_conditions) tuples
experimental_conditions = [
    (exp_data_0['Time'].values, exp_data_0[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}),
    (exp_data_3['Time'].values, exp_data_3[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.5}),
    (exp_data_9['Time'].values, exp_data_9[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.5, 'id_6m7j': 0.0})
]

# Load the initial SBML model structure
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add 'Source' (constant species) and 'Sink' (boundary species) if not already present
if not model.getSpecies("Source"):
    source_species = model.createSpecies()
    source_species.setId("Source")
    source_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    source_species.setInitialConcentration(1.0)
    source_species.setConstant(True)

if not model.getSpecies("Sink"):
    sink_species = model.createSpecies()
    sink_species.setId("Sink")
    sink_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    sink_species.setInitialConcentration(0.0)
    sink_species.setBoundaryCondition(True)

# Remove existing reactions if any
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add parameters for rate constants (k1, Vmax2, Km2, k3, k4)
param_ids = ["k1", "Vmax2", "Km2", "k3", "k4"]
# Initial guesses - k1, k3 from previous mass-action fit, k4=0, Vmax2/Km2 need guess
# k2 was ~0.345. Vmax2/Km2 should be around this value for low [id_6m7j]
# Let's guess Vmax2 ~ 0.5, Km2 ~ 0.5 (so Vmax/Km ~ 1) - need better initial guess strategy
# Let's try Vmax2 ~ k2 * typical_[id_6m7j], Km2 ~ typical_[id_6m7j]
# Typical [id_6m7j] in exp_0 is around 0.5-1.0. Let's try Km2=0.5, Vmax2 = 0.345 * 0.5 = 0.17
initial_param_values = {
    "k1": 0.917,   # From previous fit
    "Vmax2": 0.17, # Guess based on k2 and typical [id_6m7j]
    "Km2": 0.5,    # Guess
    "k3": 0.0518,  # From previous fit
    "k4": 0.0      # From previous fit
}

for param_id, value in initial_param_values.items():
    if not model.getParameter(param_id):
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(param_id)
        p.setValue(value)
        p.setConstant(True)

# Add Reaction 1: Source -> id_6m7j (Mass Action)
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("reaction1_Source_to_6m7j")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
r1_reactant = reaction1.createReactant()
r1_reactant.setSpecies("Source")
r1_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r1_product = reaction1.createProduct()
r1_product.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r1_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law1.setFormula("k1 * Source")

# Add Reaction 2: id_6m7j -> id_cue9 (Michaelis-Menten)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("reaction2_6m7j_to_cue9")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
r2_reactant = reaction2.createReactant()
r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r2_product = reaction2.createProduct()
r2_product.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r2_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law2.setFormula("(Vmax2 * id_6m7j) / (Km2 + id_6m7j)")

# Add Reaction 3: id_cue9 -> id_5mud (Mass Action)
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("reaction3_cue9_to_5mud")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
r3_reactant = reaction3.createReactant()
r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r3_product = reaction3.createProduct()
r3_product.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r3_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law3.setFormula("k3 * id_cue9")

# Add Reaction 4: id_5mud -> Sink (Mass Action)
reaction4 = model.createReaction()
reaction4.setId("reaction4_5mud_to_Sink")
reaction4.setReversible(False)
r4_reactant = reaction4.createReactant()
r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r4_product = reaction4.createProduct()
r4_product.setSpecies("Sink")
r4_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law4 = reaction4.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law4.setFormula("k4 * id_5mud")


# Get the base SBML string with MM kinetics for reaction 2
base_sbml_string_mm_r2 = libsbml.SBMLWriter().writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

def update_sbml_params_mm_r2(sbml_string, params):
    """Updates parameter values in an SBML string for the MM R2 model."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()
    param_ids = ["k1", "Vmax2", "Km2", "k3", "k4"]
    for i, param_id in enumerate(param_ids):
        p = model.getParameter(param_id)
        if p:
            p.setValue(params[i])
        else:
            print(f"Warning: Parameter {param_id} not found.")
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    return writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

def simulate_with_ic(sbml_string, initial_conditions):
    """Simulates an SBML model with specified initial concentrations."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()

    for species_id, conc in initial_conditions.items():
        species = model.getSpecies(species_id)
        if species:
            species.setInitialConcentration(conc)
        else:
             print(f"Warning: Species {species_id} not found for IC change.")

    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    sim_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

    sim_data = simulate(sim_sbml)
    return sim_data


def objective_function_mm_r2(params, base_sbml_string, experimental_conditions):
    """Calculates the sum of squared errors for multiple experimental conditions."""
    try:
        # Ensure parameters are non-negative (Km must be > 0)
        if any(p < 0 for p in params) or params[2] <= 0: # Km2 must be > 0
            return np.inf

        # Update the base SBML model with current parameters
        updated_sbml = update_sbml_params_mm_r2(base_sbml_string, params)

        total_sse = 0
        for exp_times, exp_species_data, initial_conditions in experimental_conditions:
            # Simulate the model with specific initial conditions
            sim_data = simulate_with_ic(updated_sbml, initial_conditions)

            if sim_data is None or sim_data.empty or 'Time' not in sim_data.columns:
                 print("Simulation failed or returned empty data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf

            if sim_data['Time'].iloc[-1] < exp_times[-1]:
                 print("Simulation time range is shorter than experimental data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf

            species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time']
            sim_species_data = sim_data[species_ids]

            interp_sim_data = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data)
            for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
                 interp_sim_data[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times, sim_data['Time'], sim_data[species_id])

            sse = np.sum((interp_sim_data - exp_species_data)**2)
            total_sse += sse

        return total_sse

    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error during objective function evaluation: {e}")
        return np.inf


# Initial guess for parameters (k1, Vmax2, Km2, k3, k4)
initial_params_mm_r2 = [initial_param_values[id] for id in param_ids]

# Parameter bounds (non-negative, Km > 0)
bounds_mm_r2 = [(0, None), (0, None), (1e-6, None), (0, None), (0, None)] # Km2 bound > 0

# Perform optimization
print("Starting parameter fitting for MM R2 model with 3 conditions...")
result_mm_r2 = minimize(objective_function_mm_r2, initial_params_mm_r2, args=(base_sbml_string_mm_r2, experimental_conditions), method='L-BFGS-B', bounds=bounds_mm_r2)

print("Optimization finished.")
print("Result:", result_mm_r2)

# Get the fitted parameters
fitted_params_mm_r2 = result_mm_r2.x
print("Fitted parameters (k1, Vmax2, Km2, k3, k4):", fitted_params_mm_r2)

# Update the SBML model with fitted parameters
fitted_sbml_string_mm_r2 = update_sbml_params_mm_r2(base_sbml_string_mm_r2, fitted_params_mm_r2)

# Store the fitted MM R2 SBML model
shared_variables.add("fitted_sbml_model_mm_r2", fitted_sbml_string_mm_r2)

# Simulate the model with fitted parameters for all conditions and print comparison
print("\n--- Comparison with Fitted MM R2 Model (3 conditions) ---")

for i, (exp_times, exp_species_data, initial_conditions) in enumerate(experimental_conditions):
    print(f"\nCondition {i}: Initial Concentrations {initial_conditions}")
    sim_data_fitted = simulate_with_ic(fitted_sbml_string_mm_r2, initial_conditions)
    print("Simulation Data (first 10 rows):")
    print(sim_data_fitted.head(10))
    print("\nExperimental Data (first 10 rows):")
    print(exp_species_data[:10])

    species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time']
    sim_species_data = sim_data_fitted[species_ids]
    interp_sim_data = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data)
    for j, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
         interp_sim_data[:, j] = np.interp(exp_times, sim_data_fitted['Time'], sim_data_fitted[species_id])
    sse = np.sum((interp_sim_data - exp_species_data)**2)
    print(f"\nSum of Squared Errors for Condition {i}: {sse}")

print(f"\nTotal SSE for all conditions: {result_mm_r2.fun}")
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Starting parameter fitting for MM R2 model with 3 conditions...
Optimization finished.
Result:   message: CONVERGENCE: RELATIVE REDUCTION OF F <= FACTR*EPSMCH
  success: True
   status: 0
      fun: 434.68880441882146
        x: [ 9.131e-01  7.277e-01  1.580e+00  5.216e-02  0.000e+00]
      nit: 35
      jac: [ 1.300e-02  1.676e-02 -6.236e-03  4.912e-02  1.627e+03]
     nfev: 240
     njev: 40
 hess_inv: <5x5 LbfgsInvHessProduct with dtype=float64>
Fitted parameters (k1, Vmax2, Km2, k3, k4): [0.91310836 0.72769131 1.58044663 0.05216496 0.        ]

--- Comparison with Fitted MM R2 Model (3 conditions) ---

Condition 0: Initial Concentrations {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
        id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000e+00  0.000000  0.000000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  2.107144e-08  0.000067  0.016235  0.983698   0.0  0.018
2  1.666723e-07  0.000264  0.032073  0.967663   0.0  0.036
3  5.562301e-07  0.000586  0.047526  0.951888   0.0  0.054
4  1.303906e-06  0.001026  0.062602  0.936371   0.0  0.072
5  2.518893e-06  0.001580  0.077311  0.921106   0.0  0.090
6  4.305695e-06  0.002243  0.091662  0.906091   0.0  0.108
7  6.764374e-06  0.003011  0.105662  0.891320   0.0  0.126
8  9.990800e-06  0.003878  0.119322  0.876790   0.0  0.144
9  1.407687e-05  0.004841  0.132648  0.862497   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00]
 [1.16517089e-08 1.94283434e-05 5.40000000e-03]
 [9.31438640e-08 7.76667726e-05 1.08000000e-02]
 [3.14077875e-07 1.74645498e-04 1.61999998e-02]
 [7.43811263e-07 3.10294846e-04 2.15999993e-02]
 [1.45145327e-06 4.84545265e-04 2.69999977e-02]
 [2.50586020e-06 6.97327326e-04 3.23999944e-02]
 [3.97564015e-06 9.48571718e-04 3.77999878e-02]
 [5.92915431e-06 1.23820924e-03 4.31999763e-02]
 [8.43452078e-06 1.56617079e-03 4.85999570e-02]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 0: 301.46964765807763

Condition 1: Initial Concentrations {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.5}
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
    id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000  0.000000  0.500000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  0.000001  0.003178  0.513122  0.983698   0.0  0.018
2  0.000006  0.006414  0.525918  0.967663   0.0  0.036
3  0.000014  0.009706  0.538392  0.951888   0.0  0.054
4  0.000024  0.013052  0.550553  0.936371   0.0  0.072
5  0.000038  0.016449  0.562407  0.921106   0.0  0.090
6  0.000055  0.019896  0.573958  0.906091   0.0  0.108
7  0.000075  0.023390  0.585214  0.891320   0.0  0.126
8  0.000099  0.026930  0.596181  0.876790   0.0  0.144
9  0.000126  0.030514  0.606863  0.862497   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00 5.00000000e-01]
 [3.24776542e-06 3.61619023e-03 5.05399969e-01]
 [1.30220734e-05 7.26472139e-03 5.10799746e-01]
 [2.93692965e-05 1.09455332e-02 5.16199135e-01]
 [5.23356030e-05 1.46585641e-02 5.21597929e-01]
 [8.19669833e-05 1.84037511e-02 5.26995917e-01]
 [1.18309231e-04 2.21810299e-02 5.32392877e-01]
 [1.61407931e-04 2.59903345e-02 5.37788583e-01]
 [2.11308467e-04 2.98315975e-02 5.43182798e-01]
 [2.68056015e-04 3.37047498e-02 5.48575279e-01]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 1: 103.78731204790404

Condition 2: Initial Concentrations {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.5, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
    id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000  0.500000  0.000000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  0.000469  0.499598  0.016235  0.983698   0.0  0.018
2  0.000938  0.499326  0.032073  0.967663   0.0  0.036
3  0.001407  0.499179  0.047526  0.951888   0.0  0.054
4  0.001876  0.499152  0.062602  0.936371   0.0  0.072
5  0.002344  0.499239  0.077311  0.921106   0.0  0.090
6  0.002813  0.499434  0.091661  0.906091   0.0  0.108
7  0.003282  0.499735  0.105662  0.891320   0.0  0.126
8  0.003752  0.500136  0.119322  0.876790   0.0  0.144
9  0.004222  0.500634  0.132648  0.862497   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.         0.5        0.        ]
 [0.00089839 0.49912024 0.00539991]
 [0.00179362 0.4982809  0.01079926]
 [0.00268577 0.49748191 0.0161975 ]
 [0.00357492 0.49672317 0.02159407]
 [0.00446113 0.49600462 0.02698843]
 [0.0053445  0.49532615 0.03238003]
 [0.00622509 0.49468767 0.03776832]
 [0.00710299 0.49408909 0.04315278]
 [0.00797826 0.4935303  0.04853285]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 2: 29.43184471283979

Total SSE for all conditions: 434.68880441882146

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 8/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_9)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model_reversible, fitted_sbml_model_mm, fitted_sbml_model_inhibited, fitted_sbml_model_massaction_3cond, fitted_sbml_model_inhibited_cue9, fitted_sbml_model_mm_r2)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 13
## Thoughts
The fitting for the model with Michaelis-Menten kinetics for the second reaction (`id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9`) using all three datasets resulted in a total SSE of ~434.69. This is slightly lower than the simple mass-action model's SSE (~437.61), suggesting a marginal improvement.

The fitted parameters are: k1=0.913, Vmax2=0.728, Km2=1.58, k3=0.052, and k4=0.0. Again, k4 is zero. The Km2 value (1.58) is relatively high compared to the typical concentrations of `id_6m7j` (peaks around 1.2 in exp_0, starts at 0.5 and peaks around 1.05 in exp_3). A high Km means the reaction is far from saturation in the observed concentration range, making the MM kinetics behave somewhat linearly (rate ~ (Vmax2/Km2) * [id_6m7j]). The ratio Vmax2/Km2 is ~0.728 / 1.58 ~ 0.46, which is in the same ballpark as the mass-action k2 (~0.345). This explains why the improvement is only marginal.

Let's look at the SSE for each condition:
- Condition 0: SSE ~301.47 (vs ~305.26 for simple MA) - Slight improvement.
- Condition 1 (id_6m7j=0.5): SSE ~103.79 (vs ~105.44 for simple MA) - Slight improvement.
- Condition 2 (id_cue9=0.5): SSE ~29.43 (vs ~26.91 for simple MA) - Slightly worse.

The MM kinetics for R2 provided a small overall improvement but didn't dramatically change the picture. The simple irreversible linear mass-action model with k4=0 still provides a reasonable baseline fit, and the MM R2 model is only slightly better overall, performing slightly worse on condition 2.

The persistent issue is the fit to condition 1 (`id_6m7j=0.5`), where the model struggles to capture the initial dynamics of `id_6m7j`. The experimental data shows `id_6m7j` increasing from 0.5 at a certain rate, while the simulation predicts a slightly faster initial increase.

Let's consider the possibility that the first reaction (Source -> `id_6m7j`) is also Michaelis-Menten limited, even though 'Source' is constant. This would mean the enzyme catalyzing this step is saturated or partially saturated by the 'Source' substrate. Rate = `Vmax1 * Source / (Km1 + Source)`. Since Source=1, this is `Vmax1 / (Km1 + 1)`. This is still just a constant rate, equivalent to k1*Source. So, MM kinetics on the first step with a constant source doesn't add complexity unless the 'Source' concentration could change (which it can't, as it's constant=1.0).

What if the 'Source' itself is not a single constant species, but represents a pool that is consumed? However, the problem states we don't need to add new species, and 'Source' is defined as constant.

Let's revisit the possibility of feedback. We tried inhibition of R1 by `id_6m7j` and `id_cue9` with simple forms, and they didn't help much. What about activation? Or inhibition of R2 or R3?

Consider the `id_6m7j=0.5` experiment again. The simulated `id_6m7j` increases faster than observed. This means the net rate of change of `id_6m7j` is too high in the simulation. Rate of change of `id_6m7j` = Rate(R1) - Rate(R2).
If Rate(R1) = k1 * Source and Rate(R2) = k2 * id_6m7j, then d[id_6m7j]/dt = k1 * Source - k2 * id_6m7j.
With fitted parameters (k1~0.91, k2~0.345, Source=1) and initial [id_6m7j]=0.5, the initial rate is 0.91 * 1 - 0.345 * 0.5 = 0.91 - 0.1725 = 0.7375.
The experimental data shows `id_6m7j` going from 0.5 to ~0.5054 in 0.018 time units. The average rate is (0.5054 - 0.5) / 0.018 = 0.0054 / 0.018 = 0.3.
The simulated initial rate (0.7375) is much higher than the observed initial rate (~0.3). This discrepancy is the core issue.

This means either:
1.  The true k1 is lower when `id_6m7j` is high (inhibition of R1 by `id_6m7j` or something else). We tried simple inhibition by `id_6m7j` and `id_cue9` without significant success.
2.  The true k2 is higher when `id_6m7j` is high (activation of R2 by `id_6m7j` or something else).
3.  The true k2 is higher than the fitted value, but fitting to other conditions pulls it down.

Let's try adding activation to the second reaction (`id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9`) by `id_6m7j` itself. This is less common (substrate activation), but possible. A simple form could be `k2 * id_6m7j * (1 + [id_6m7j]/Ka2)`. Or maybe a more complex form.

Let's consider a different angle. The simple mass-action model fits condition 2 (`id_cue9=0.5`) relatively well. It fits condition 0 (`all=0`) reasonably well. The main problem is condition 1 (`id_6m7j=0.5`). This suggests the issue is specifically related to the dynamics when `id_6m7j` starts at a high concentration.

Could there be a reversible step that becomes significant only at higher concentrations? We tried reversible reactions, but the fit pushed reverse rates to zero.

Let's consider the possibility that the rate of the first reaction (Source -> `id_6m7j`) is not just `k1 * Source`, but also depends on the concentration of `id_6m7j` in a way that reduces the net production rate when `id_6m7j` is high. This points back to product inhibition on R1 by `id_6m7j`. The previous attempt used `k1 * Source / (1 + id_6m7j/Ki1)`. The fitted Ki1 was very high. Maybe a different form of inhibition? Or maybe the initial guess for Ki1 was bad?

Let's retry the `id_6m7j` self-inhibition model on R1, but with a different initial guess for Ki1. In the perturbed experiment, `id_6m7j` starts at 0.5. The initial rate is much lower than predicted by the simple MA model. This suggests significant inhibition is active at 0.5. If the rate is halved at 0.5, then Ki1 would be 0.5. Let's try an initial guess for Ki1 around 0.1-0.5.

Model structure:
Reaction 1: Source -> `id_6m7j` (Inhibited Mass Action by id_6m7j: k1 * Source / (1 + id_6m7j/Ki1))
Reaction 2: `id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9` (Mass Action: k2 * id_6m7j)
Reaction 3: `id_cue9` -> `id_5mud` (Mass Action: k3 * id_cue9)
Reaction 4: `id_5mud` -> Sink (Mass Action: k4 * id_5mud) - keep k4=0 initially.

Parameters: k1, Ki1, k2, k3, k4. Fit to all three datasets.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import minimize

# Access the experimental data from all three iterations
exp_data_0 = experiment_history['iteration_0']
exp_data_3 = experiment_history['iteration_3']
exp_data_9 = experiment_history['iteration_9']

# Combine experimental data and create a list of (time, species_data, initial_conditions) tuples
experimental_conditions = [
    (exp_data_0['Time'].values, exp_data_0[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}),
    (exp_data_3['Time'].values, exp_data_3[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.5}),
    (exp_data_9['Time'].values, exp_data_9[['id_5mud', 'id_cue9', 'id_6m7j']].values, {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.5, 'id_6m7j': 0.0})
]

# Load the initial SBML model structure
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add 'Source' (constant species) and 'Sink' (boundary species) if not already present
if not model.getSpecies("Source"):
    source_species = model.createSpecies()
    source_species.setId("Source")
    source_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    source_species.setInitialConcentration(1.0)
    source_species.setConstant(True)

if not model.getSpecies("Sink"):
    sink_species = model.createSpecies()
    sink_species.setId("Sink")
    sink_species.setCompartment("id_phg3")
    sink_species.setInitialConcentration(0.0)
    sink_species.setBoundaryCondition(True)

# Remove existing reactions if any
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add parameters for rate constants (k1, Ki1, k2, k3, k4)
param_ids = ["k1", "Ki1", "k2", "k3", "k4"]
# Initial guesses - k1, k2, k3 from previous mass-action fit, k4=0, Ki1 needs guess
# Try a lower Ki1 guess based on observation in exp_3
initial_param_values = {
    "k1": 0.917,   # From previous fit
    "Ki1": 0.3,  # Lower guess for inhibition constant
    "k2": 0.345,  # From previous fit
    "k3": 0.0518,  # From previous fit
    "k4": 0.0    # From previous fit
}

for param_id, value in initial_param_values.items():
    if not model.getParameter(param_id):
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(param_id)
        p.setValue(value)
        p.setConstant(True)

# Add Reaction 1: Source -> id_6m7j (Inhibited Mass Action by id_6m7j)
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("reaction1_Source_to_6m7j")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
r1_reactant = reaction1.createReactant()
r1_reactant.setSpecies("Source")
r1_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r1_product = reaction1.createProduct()
r1_product.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r1_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
# Rate = k1 * Source / (1 + id_6m7j/Ki1)
kinetic_law1.setFormula("(k1 * Source) / (1 + id_6m7j / Ki1)")

# Add Reaction 2: id_6m7j -> id_cue9 (Mass Action)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("reaction2_6m7j_to_cue9")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
r2_reactant = reaction2.createReactant()
r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_6m7j")
r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r2_product = reaction2.createProduct()
r2_product.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r2_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law2.setFormula("k2 * id_6m7j")

# Add Reaction 3: id_cue9 -> id_5mud (Mass Action)
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("reaction3_cue9_to_5mud")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
r3_reactant = reaction3.createReactant()
r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_cue9")
r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r3_product = reaction3.createProduct()
r3_product.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r3_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law3.setFormula("k3 * id_cue9")

# Add Reaction 4: id_5mud -> Sink (Mass Action)
reaction4 = model.createReaction()
reaction4.setId("reaction4_5mud_to_Sink")
reaction4.setReversible(False)
r4_reactant = reaction4.createReactant()
r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_5mud")
r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1)
r4_product = reaction4.createProduct()
r4_product.setSpecies("Sink")
r4_product.setStoichiometry(1)
kinetic_law4 = reaction4.createKineticLaw()
kinetic_law4.setFormula("k4 * id_5mud")


# Get the base SBML string with inhibited kinetics
base_sbml_string_inhibited = libsbml.SBMLWriter().writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

def update_sbml_params_inhibited(sbml_string, params):
    """Updates parameter values in an SBML string for the inhibited model."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()
    param_ids = ["k1", "Ki1", "k2", "k3", "k4"]
    for i, param_id in enumerate(param_ids):
        p = model.getParameter(param_id)
        if p:
            p.setValue(params[i])
        else:
            print(f"Warning: Parameter {param_id} not found.")
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    return writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

def simulate_with_ic(sbml_string, initial_conditions):
    """Simulates an SBML model with specified initial concentrations."""
    doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
    model = doc.getModel()

    for species_id, conc in initial_conditions.items():
        species = model.getSpecies(species_id)
        if species:
            species.setInitialConcentration(conc)
        else:
             print(f"Warning: Species {species_id} not found for IC change.")

    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    sim_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(doc)

    sim_data = simulate(sim_sbml)
    return sim_data


def objective_function_inhibited(params, base_sbml_string, experimental_conditions):
    """Calculates the sum of squared errors for multiple experimental conditions."""
    try:
        # Ensure parameters are non-negative (Ki must be > 0)
        if any(p < 0 for p in params) or params[1] <= 0: # Ki1 must be > 0
            return np.inf

        # Update the base SBML model with current parameters
        updated_sbml = update_sbml_params_inhibited(base_sbml_string, params)

        total_sse = 0
        for exp_times, exp_species_data, initial_conditions in experimental_conditions:
            # Simulate the model with specific initial conditions
            sim_data = simulate_with_ic(updated_sbml, initial_conditions)

            if sim_data is None or sim_data.empty or 'Time' not in sim_data.columns:
                 print("Simulation failed or returned empty data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf

            if sim_data['Time'].iloc[-1] < exp_times[-1]:
                 print("Simulation time range is shorter than experimental data for a condition.")
                 return np.inf

            species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time']
            sim_species_data = sim_data[species_ids]

            interp_sim_data = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data)
            for i, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
                 interp_sim_data[:, i] = np.interp(exp_times, sim_data['Time'], sim_data[species_id])

            sse = np.sum((interp_sim_data - exp_species_data)**2)
            total_sse += sse

        return total_sse

    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error during objective function evaluation: {e}")
        return np.inf


# Initial guess for parameters (k1, Ki1, k2, k3, k4)
initial_params_inhibited = [initial_param_values[id] for id in param_ids]

# Parameter bounds (non-negative, Ki > 0)
bounds_inhibited = [(0, None), (1e-6, None), (0, None), (0, None), (0, None)] # Ki1 bound > 0

# Perform optimization
print("Starting parameter fitting for id_6m7j inhibited model (retry) with 3 conditions...")
result_inhibited = minimize(objective_function_inhibited, initial_params_inhibited, args=(base_sbml_string_inhibited, experimental_conditions), method='L-BFGS-B', bounds=bounds_inhibited)

print("Optimization finished.")
print("Result:", result_inhibited)

# Get the fitted parameters
fitted_params_inhibited = result_inhibited.x
print("Fitted parameters (k1, Ki1, k2, k3, k4):", fitted_params_inhibited)

# Update the SBML model with fitted parameters
fitted_sbml_string_inhibited = update_sbml_params_inhibited(base_sbml_string_inhibited, fitted_params_inhibited)

# Store the fitted inhibited SBML model
shared_variables.add("fitted_sbml_model_inhibited_retry", fitted_sbml_string_inhibited)

# Simulate the model with fitted parameters for all conditions and print comparison
print("\n--- Comparison with Fitted id_6m7j Inhibited Model (retry, 3 conditions) ---")

for i, (exp_times, exp_species_data, initial_conditions) in enumerate(experimental_conditions):
    print(f"\nCondition {i}: Initial Concentrations {initial_conditions}")
    sim_data_fitted = simulate_with_ic(fitted_sbml_string_inhibited, initial_conditions)
    print("Simulation Data (first 10 rows):")
    print(sim_data_fitted.head(10))
    print("\nExperimental Data (first 10 rows):")
    print(exp_species_data[:10])

    species_ids = [col for col in exp_data_0.columns if col != 'Time']
    sim_species_data = sim_data_fitted[species_ids]
    interp_sim_data = np.zeros_like(exp_species_data)
    for j, species_id in enumerate(species_ids):
         interp_sim_data[:, j] = np.interp(exp_times, sim_data_fitted['Time'], sim_data_fitted[species_id])
    sse = np.sum((interp_sim_data - exp_species_data)**2)
    print(f"\nSum of Squared Errors for Condition {i}: {sse}")

print(f"\nTotal SSE for all conditions: {result_inhibited.fun}")
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Starting parameter fitting for id_6m7j inhibited model (retry) with 3 conditions...
Optimization finished.
Result:   message: ABNORMAL: 
  success: False
   status: 2
      fun: 437.7243438074866
        x: [ 9.156e-01  9.795e+01  3.462e-01  5.183e-02  0.000e+00]
      nit: 60
      jac: [-1.100e+00 -3.809e-04  2.234e+00 -1.697e+00  1.686e+03]
     nfev: 870
     njev: 145
 hess_inv: <5x5 LbfgsInvHessProduct with dtype=float64>
Fitted parameters (k1, Ki1, k2, k3, k4): [9.15617094e-01 9.79512921e+01 3.46233805e-01 5.18253493e-02
 0.00000000e+00]

--- Comparison with Fitted id_6m7j Inhibited Model (retry, 3 conditions) ---

Condition 0: Initial Concentrations {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
        id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000e+00  0.000000  0.000000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  1.587383e-08  0.000051  0.016294  0.983655   0.0  0.018
2  1.262406e-07  0.000202  0.032217  0.967580   0.0  0.036
3  4.235564e-07  0.000451  0.047778  0.951771   0.0  0.054
4  9.980661e-07  0.000796  0.062981  0.936222   0.0  0.072
5  1.937867e-06  0.001234  0.077835  0.920929   0.0  0.090
6  3.328936e-06  0.001763  0.092345  0.905889   0.0  0.108
7  5.255173e-06  0.002381  0.106518  0.891096   0.0  0.126
8  7.798451e-06  0.003086  0.120360  0.876547   0.0  0.144
9  1.103863e-05  0.003875  0.133877  0.862237   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00]
 [1.16517089e-08 1.94283434e-05 5.40000000e-03]
 [9.31438640e-08 7.76667726e-05 1.08000000e-02]
 [3.14077875e-07 1.74645498e-04 1.61999998e-02]
 [7.43811263e-07 3.10294846e-04 2.15999993e-02]
 [1.45145327e-06 4.84545265e-04 2.69999977e-02]
 [2.50586020e-06 6.97327326e-04 3.23999944e-02]
 [3.97564015e-06 9.48571718e-04 3.77999878e-02]
 [5.92915431e-06 1.23820924e-03 4.31999763e-02]
 [8.43452078e-06 1.56617079e-03 4.85999570e-02]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 0: 305.2677917401255

Condition 1: Initial Concentrations {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.0, 'id_6m7j': 0.5}
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
    id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000  0.000000  0.500000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  0.000001  0.003156  0.513105  0.983737   0.0  0.018
2  0.000006  0.006389  0.525864  0.967741   0.0  0.036
3  0.000013  0.009698  0.538282  0.952007   0.0  0.054
4  0.000024  0.013079  0.550365  0.936531   0.0  0.072
5  0.000038  0.016532  0.562121  0.921308   0.0  0.090
6  0.000055  0.020054  0.573556  0.906335   0.0  0.108
7  0.000075  0.023643  0.584675  0.891606   0.0  0.126
8  0.000099  0.027297  0.595485  0.877118   0.0  0.144
9  0.000126  0.031014  0.605992  0.862868   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.00000000e+00 0.00000000e+00 5.00000000e-01]
 [3.24776542e-06 3.61619023e-03 5.05399969e-01]
 [1.30220734e-05 7.26472139e-03 5.10799746e-01]
 [2.93692965e-05 1.09455332e-02 5.16199135e-01]
 [5.23356030e-05 1.46585641e-02 5.21597929e-01]
 [8.19669833e-05 1.84037511e-02 5.26995917e-01]
 [1.18309231e-04 2.21810299e-02 5.32392877e-01]
 [1.61407931e-04 2.59903345e-02 5.37788583e-01]
 [2.11308467e-04 2.98315975e-02 5.43182798e-01]
 [2.68056015e-04 3.37047498e-02 5.48575279e-01]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 1: 105.54941038814118

Condition 2: Initial Concentrations {'id_5mud': 0.0, 'id_cue9': 0.5, 'id_6m7j': 0.0}
Simulation Data (first 10 rows):
    id_5mud   id_cue9   id_6m7j    Source  Sink   Time
0  0.000000  0.500000  0.000000  1.000000   0.0  0.000
1  0.000466  0.499585  0.016294  0.983655   0.0  0.018
2  0.000932  0.499270  0.032217  0.967580   0.0  0.036
3  0.001398  0.499054  0.047777  0.951771   0.0  0.054
4  0.001863  0.498934  0.062981  0.936222   0.0  0.072
5  0.002329  0.498908  0.077834  0.920929   0.0  0.090
6  0.002794  0.498973  0.092345  0.905889   0.0  0.108
7  0.003260  0.499127  0.106517  0.891096   0.0  0.126
8  0.003725  0.499368  0.120360  0.876547   0.0  0.144
9  0.004191  0.499695  0.133877  0.862237   0.0  0.162

Experimental Data (first 10 rows):
[[0.         0.5        0.        ]
 [0.00089839 0.49912024 0.00539991]
 [0.00179362 0.4982809  0.01079926]
 [0.00268577 0.49748191 0.0161975 ]
 [0.00357492 0.49672317 0.02159407]
 [0.00446113 0.49600462 0.02698843]
 [0.0053445  0.49532615 0.03238003]
 [0.00622509 0.49468767 0.03776832]
 [0.00710299 0.49408909 0.04315278]
 [0.00797826 0.4935303  0.04853285]]

Sum of Squared Errors for Condition 2: 26.907141679216025

Total SSE for all conditions: 437.7243438074866

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 7/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_3, iteration_9)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model, fitted_sbml_model_reversible, fitted_sbml_model_mm, fitted_sbml_model_inhibited, fitted_sbml_model_massaction_3cond, fitted_sbml_model_inhibited_cue9, fitted_sbml_model_mm_r2, fitted_sbml_model_inhibited_retry)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 14
## Thoughts
Retrying the `id_6m7j` self-inhibition model on the first reaction with a different initial guess for Ki1 did not improve the fit. The optimizer again found a very high Ki1 (~97.95), effectively making the inhibition negligible. The total SSE (~437.72) is almost identical to the simple mass-action model (~437.61). The optimization also finished with an "ABNORMAL" status, suggesting it might have struggled to converge or found a boundary solution (the high Ki1).

The fitted parameters are: k1=0.9156, Ki1=97.95, k2=0.346, k3=0.0518, k4=0.0. Again, k4 is zero. The values for k1, k2, k3 are very similar to the simple mass-action fit.

The SSEs for individual conditions are also very similar to the simple mass-action model:
- Condition 0: SSE ~305.27 (vs ~305.26 for simple MA)
- Condition 1 (id_6m7j=0.5): SSE ~105.55 (vs ~105.44 for simple MA)
- Condition 2 (id_cue9=0.5): SSE ~26.91 (vs ~26.91 for simple MA)

It seems clear that simple product inhibition of R1 by `id_6m7j` or `id_cue9`, or simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics for R2, do not significantly improve the model's ability to fit all three datasets compared to the basic irreversible linear mass-action model.

The simple irreversible linear mass-action model (Source -> `id_6m7j` -> `id_cue9` -> `id_5mud` with k4=0) with parameters k1=0.917, k2=0.345, k3=0.0518, k4=0.0 (from Iteration 10) is currently the best candidate model based on the total SSE across all three conditions (~437.61).

Let's take a step back and look at the overall behavior again. The sequential peaks in the original experiment strongly support the linear chain structure. The failure of reversible reactions and simple inhibition/MM kinetics to improve the fit suggests these might not be the primary missing mechanisms, or the chosen kinetic forms are incorrect.

The persistent zero value for k4 suggests `id_5mud` is indeed the final product and is not consumed by a simple mass-action process.

The main remaining discrepancy is the quantitative fit, particularly the initial rate of `id_6m7j` increase in the `id_6m7j=0.5` experiment.

Could there be a delay in the reactions? Or perhaps the stoichiometry is not 1:1? The problem statement says "You do not need to add new species," and the initial model implies 1:1 stoichiometry.

Given the limited improvement from adding complexity (reversibility, MM, inhibition), and the consistent zero k4, the simple irreversible mass-action model with k4=0 seems the most parsimonious explanation that fits the qualitative behavior and provides the lowest (or very close to lowest) SSE across all tested models and conditions.

Let's consider the possibility that the true system *is* this simple linear irreversible mass-action chain, and the remaining error is due to experimental noise or limitations of the simulation/fitting process. The SSE of ~437 across three experiments and three species over 100 time points each is not extremely high, although not perfect.

Before submitting, let's double-check the best-fitting simple mass-action model from Iteration 10.
Parameters: k1=0.91741414, k2=0.34531028, k3=0.05182491, k4=0.0.
Reactions:
1. Source -> id_6m7j, rate = k1 * Source
2. id_6m7j -> id_cue9, rate = k2 * id_6m7j
3. id_cue9 -> id_5mud, rate = k3 * id_cue9
4. id_5mud -> Sink, rate = k4 * id_5mud (with k4=0, this reaction has zero rate)

This model structure seems the most likely candidate based on the data and fitting results. I will prepare the SBML for this model.

The SBML should include:
- Species: `id_5mud`, `id_cue9`, `id_6m7j` (initial conc 0 as per original model, perturbations handle non-zero starts), `Source` (constant, initial conc 1), `Sink` (boundary, initial conc 0).
- Parameters: k1, k2, k3, k4 with the fitted values.
- Reactions: The four reactions with mass-action kinetics using the parameters.

I will use the `fitted_sbml_model_massaction_3cond` from `shared_variables` as the base, as it already has the correct structure and fitted parameters. I just need to ensure it's the final model I want to submit.

## Action

### Submit
```python
import libsbml

# Access the best-fitting simple mass-action model from shared variables
final_sbml = shared_variables.access("fitted_sbml_model_massaction_3cond")

# Print the final SBML string (optional, for verification)
# print(final_sbml)

# The variable 'final_sbml' is now set for submission.
```
