
                # Interation 0

                ## Task Info
                You are investigating a biological system where all species are observable. Your goal is to discover the missing reactions. You do not need to add new species.


                ## Incomplete SBML Model. You can assess it as input_sbml_string.

                <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<sbml xmlns="http://www.sbml.org/sbml/level2/version4" level="2" version="4">
  <model id="id_u0ha">
    <listOfUnitDefinitions>
      <unitDefinition id="id_z4nh">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="litre" exponent="1" scale="-3" multiplier="1"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
      <unitDefinition id="id_nxoo">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="mole" exponent="1" scale="-3" multiplier="1"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
    </listOfUnitDefinitions>
    <listOfCompartments>
      <compartment id="id_cqy4" spatialDimensions="3" size="1" constant="true"/>
    </listOfCompartments>
    <listOfSpecies>
      <species id="id_mkmu" compartment="id_cqy4" initialConcentration="0" boundaryCondition="false" constant="false"/>
      <species id="id_3wq1" compartment="id_cqy4" initialConcentration="0" boundaryCondition="false" constant="false"/>
      <species id="id_k51j" compartment="id_cqy4" initialConcentration="0" boundaryCondition="false" constant="false"/>
    </listOfSpecies>
  </model>
</sbml>


                ## Max iterations
                20

                Format your response according to the instructions in the system message.
                
## Thoughts
The initial SBML model has three species: `id_mkmu`, `id_3wq1`, and `id_k51j`. All initial concentrations are set to 0, and there are no reactions. This means that if I simulate this model, nothing will happen.

My first step is to observe the system's behavior under default conditions. This will give me a baseline to understand how the species' concentrations change over time.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
   "action": "observe",
   "meta_data": {}
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_0
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_0]

Total size: 283 rows × 4 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_0] for the full data

Time   id_mkmu  id_3wq1  id_k51j
0         0        0        0
...
4.43e-01  5.50e-10 1.24e-73 4.43e-02
...
8.87e-01  2.65e-07 2.38e-52 8.87e-02
...
1.33e+00  9.78e-06 1.28e-39 1.33e-01
...
1.77e+00  1.25e-04 1.16e-30 1.77e-01
...
2.22e+00  8.97e-04 1.03e-23 2.22e-01
...
2.66e+00  4.44e-03 4.67e-18 2.66e-01
...
3.10e+00  1.69e-02 2.34e-13 3.10e-01
...
3.55e+00  5.18e-02 2.02e-09 3.55e-01
...
3.99e+00  1.30e-01 3.83e-06 3.99e-01
...
4.43e+00  2.62e-01 1.38e-03 4.43e-01
...
4.88e+00  4.23e-01 7.70e-02 4.88e-01
...
5.32e+00  5.56e-01 4.30e-01 5.09e-01
...
5.76e+00  4.35e-01 5.53e-01 2.57e-01
...
6.21e+00  2.80e-01 3.92e-01 1.85e-01
...
6.65e+00  1.80e-01 2.53e-01 2.20e-01
...
7.09e+00  1.19e-01 1.62e-01 2.64e-01
...
7.54e+00  8.85e-02 1.04e-01 3.08e-01
...
7.98e+00  9.40e-02 6.70e-02 3.53e-01
...
8.42e+00  1.51e-01 4.30e-02 3.97e-01
...
8.87e+00  2.68e-01 2.94e-02 4.41e-01
...
9.31e+00  4.22e-01 9.35e-02 4.86e-01
...
9.75e+00  5.52e-01 4.30e-01 5.07e-01
...
1.02e+01  4.32e-01 5.48e-01 2.59e-01
...
1.06e+01  2.78e-01 3.88e-01 1.90e-01
...
1.11e+01  1.79e-01 2.50e-01 2.25e-01
...
1.15e+01  1.19e-01 1.61e-01 2.69e-01
...
1.20e+01  9.02e-02 1.03e-01 3.13e-01
...
1.24e+01  9.94e-02 6.63e-02 3.58e-01
...
1.29e+01  1.62e-01 4.26e-02 4.02e-01
...
1.33e+01  2.85e-01 3.03e-02 4.46e-01
...
1.37e+01  4.39e-01 1.20e-01 4.91e-01
...
1.42e+01  5.57e-01 4.66e-01 4.89e-01
...
1.46e+01  4.11e-01 5.35e-01 2.39e-01
...
1.51e+01  2.64e-01 3.69e-01 1.92e-01
...
1.55e+01  1.71e-01 2.38e-01 2.30e-01
...
1.60e+01  1.14e-01 1.53e-01 2.74e-01
...
1.64e+01  8.92e-02 9.81e-02 3.19e-01
...
1.68e+01  1.04e-01 6.30e-02 3.63e-01
...
1.73e+01  1.74e-01 4.05e-02 4.07e-01
...
1.77e+01  3.03e-01 3.09e-02 4.52e-01
...
1.82e+01  4.57e-01 1.53e-01 4.96e-01
...
1.86e+01  5.56e-01 4.98e-01 4.62e-01
...
1.91e+01  3.90e-01 5.18e-01 2.22e-01
...
1.95e+01  2.51e-01 3.50e-01 1.96e-01
...
1.99e+01  1.62e-01 2.26e-01 2.36e-01
...
2.04e+01  1.09e-01 1.45e-01 2.80e-01
...
2.08e+01  8.86e-02 9.30e-02 3.24e-01
...
2.13e+01  1.09e-01 5.97e-02 3.68e-01
...
2.50e+01  9.43e-02 1.15e-01 3.03e-01

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 20/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 1
## Thoughts
The experimental data shows oscillatory behavior for all three species: `id_k51j`, `id_mkmu`, and `id_3wq1`. The species appear to peak in a sequence: `id_k51j` first, then `id_mkmu`, then `id_3wq1`. This suggests a cascade-like activation or conversion, and the oscillation implies a negative feedback loop.

I hypothesize a model structure:
1.  **S1_production**: `-> id_k51j` (This reaction is inhibited by `id_3wq1`)
2.  **S1_to_S2_conversion**: `id_k51j -> id_mkmu`
3.  **S2_to_S3_conversion**: `id_mkmu -> id_3wq1`
4.  **S3_degradation**: `id_3wq1 -> `

This forms a three-component negative feedback loop, which is a known motif for generating oscillations. `id_k51j` is S1, `id_mkmu` is S2, and `id_3wq1` is S3.

My plan is:
1.  Plot the experimental data to visualize the dynamics.
2.  Implement the hypothesized model in SBML format using `libsbml`. I will need to add reactions and define parameters for their kinetics.
3.  Simulate the new SBML model with initial guessed parameters.
4.  Compare the simulation results with the experimental data. This will guide further refinement of the model or parameters.

## Action

### Code
```python
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Plot experimental data ---
obs_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']
shared_variables.add("obs_data_0", obs_data) # Save for future reference

plt.figure(figsize=(12, 7))
plt.plot(obs_data['Time'], obs_data['id_mkmu'], label='id_mkmu (Observed)')
plt.plot(obs_data['Time'], obs_data['id_3wq1'], label='id_3wq1 (Observed)')
plt.plot(obs_data['Time'], obs_data['id_k51j'], label='id_k51j (Observed)')
plt.xlabel('Time')
plt.ylabel('Concentration')
plt.title('Observed Experimental Data (iteration_0)')
plt.legend()
plt.grid(True)
plt.savefig("plot_observed_data.png")
print("Plot of observed data saved as plot_observed_data.png")

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()
compartment_id = model.getCompartment(0).getId()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# Parameter values (initial guesses)
params = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.6,   # Max production rate of S1
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.1,      # Inhibition constant of S3 on S1 production
    "n_hill": 4.0,          # Hill coefficient for inhibition
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.3,   # Rate constant for S1 -> S2
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.3,   # Rate constant for S2 -> S3
    "k_deg_s3": 0.3         # Rate constant for S3 degradation
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
# Kinetic law: k_prod_s1_max / (1 + (S3/Ki_s3_s1)^n_hill)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
# Product S1
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
# Kinetic Law
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(
    f"{compartment_id} * k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
)
kl_prod_s1.setMath(math_ast_prod_s1)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
# Kinetic law: k_conv_s1s2 * S1
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
# Reactant S1
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
# Product S2
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
# Kinetic Law
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_conv_s1s2 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(
    f"{compartment_id} * k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}"
)
kl_conv_s1s2.setMath(math_ast_conv_s1s2)

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
# Kinetic law: k_conv_s2s3 * S2
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
# Reactant S2
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
# Product S3
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
# Kinetic Law
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_conv_s2s3 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(
    f"{compartment_id} * k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}"
)
kl_conv_s2s3.setMath(math_ast_conv_s2s3)

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
# Kinetic law: k_deg_s3 * S3
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
# Reactant S3
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
# Kinetic Law
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_deg_s3 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(
    f"{compartment_id} * k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}"
)
kl_deg_s3.setMath(math_ast_deg_s3)

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_1", current_sbml_model_str)
print("SBML model constructed with hypothesized reactions and parameters.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
# The simulate function is globally available.
sim_data = simulate(current_sbml_model_str)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_1", sim_data)
print("Simulation of the hypothesized model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data ---
plt.figure(figsize=(18, 12))

# Plot S1 (id_k51j)
plt.subplot(3, 1, 1)
plt.plot(obs_data['Time'], obs_data[s1_id], label=f'{s1_id} (Observed)', linestyle='--')
plt.plot(sim_data['Time'], sim_data[s1_id], label=f'{s1_id} (Simulated)')
plt.title(f'{s1_id} Comparison')
plt.xlabel('Time')
plt.ylabel('Concentration')
plt.legend()
plt.grid(True)

# Plot S2 (id_mkmu)
plt.subplot(3, 1, 2)
plt.plot(obs_data['Time'], obs_data[s2_id], label=f'{s2_id} (Observed)', linestyle='--')
plt.plot(sim_data['Time'], sim_data[s2_id], label=f'{s2_id} (Simulated)')
plt.title(f'{s2_id} Comparison')
plt.xlabel('Time')
plt.ylabel('Concentration')
plt.legend()
plt.grid(True)

# Plot S3 (id_3wq1)
plt.subplot(3, 1, 3)
plt.plot(obs_data['Time'], obs_data[s3_id], label=f'{s3_id} (Observed)', linestyle='--')
plt.plot(sim_data['Time'], sim_data[s3_id], label=f'{s3_id} (Simulated)')
plt.title(f'{s3_id} Comparison')
plt.xlabel('Time')
plt.ylabel('Concentration')
plt.legend()
plt.grid(True)

plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig("plot_comparison_iteration_1.png")
print("Plot comparing observed and simulated data saved as plot_comparison_iteration_1.png")

# Print some info about the simulation results
print("\nSimulated data sample:")
print(sim_data.head())

print("\nObserved data sample:")
print(obs_data.head())

# Check for NaNs or extreme values in simulation
if sim_data.isnull().values.any():
    print("\nWarning: Simulation results contain NaNs.")
if (sim_data.drop('Time', axis=1) > 1e5).any().any() or (sim_data.drop('Time', axis=1) < -1e5).any().any():
    print("\nWarning: Simulation results contain very large or small values.")

```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 Unauthorized modules matplotlib detected. Only these modules are allowed: numpy, pandas, libsbml, math, scipy, jax, sklearn, io, traceback.

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 19/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 2
## Thoughts
The previous attempt to plot the data failed because `matplotlib` is not an allowed library. I need to remove the plotting code and rely on printing data summaries or saving data to `shared_variables` for later analysis if needed.

The core logic of building the SBML model and simulating it should still be valid. I will proceed with that, but without the plotting. I will print the head and tail of the observed and simulated dataframes to get a sense of the comparison.

My plan is:
1.  Retrieve the observed data.
2.  Implement the hypothesized model in SBML format using `libsbml` with the same reactions and initial parameter guesses as before.
3.  Simulate the new SBML model.
4.  Print summaries of the observed and simulated data to compare them.

The species mapping is:
- `id_k51j` as S1 (produced, converts to S2, inhibited by S3)
- `id_mkmu` as S2 (produced from S1, converts to S3)
- `id_3wq1` as S3 (produced from S2, degrades, inhibits S1 production)

The reactions are:
1.  `-> id_k51j` (S1 production, inhibited by `id_3wq1`)
    Kinetic law: `k_prod_s1_max / (1 + (id_3wq1/Ki_s3_s1)^n_hill)`
2.  `id_k51j -> id_mkmu` (S1 to S2 conversion)
    Kinetic law: `k_conv_s1s2 * id_k51j`
3.  `id_mkmu -> id_3wq1` (S2 to S3 conversion)
    Kinetic law: `k_conv_s2s3 * id_mkmu`
4.  `id_3wq1 -> ` (S3 degradation)
    Kinetic law: `k_deg_s3 * id_3wq1`

I will use the same parameter guesses as before:
- `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.6
- `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.1
- `n_hill`: 4.0
- `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.3
- `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.3
- `k_deg_s3`: 0.3

The initial concentrations in the observed data are all zero, which matches the SBML model's default.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']
# If obs_data was saved in a previous (successful) code run, it could be accessed via:
# obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")
# However, since the previous run failed before saving, we re-access from experiment_history.
shared_variables.add("obs_data_0", obs_data) # Save for future reference

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary:")
print(obs_data.head())
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()
compartment_id = model.getCompartment(0).getId()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# Parameter values (initial guesses)
params = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.6,   # Max production rate of S1
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.1,      # Inhibition constant of S3 on S1 production
    "n_hill": 4.0,          # Hill coefficient for inhibition
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.3,   # Rate constant for S1 -> S2
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.3,   # Rate constant for S2 -> S3
    "k_deg_s3": 0.3         # Rate constant for S3 degradation
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True) # Parameters are constant

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
# Kinetic law: k_prod_s1_max / (1 + (S3/Ki_s3_s1)^n_hill)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
# Product S1
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False) # Species are not constant
# Kinetic Law
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
# Formula: compartment * k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow(s3_id / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))
# Note: libSBML L3 requires explicit compartment multiplication for rates if species are in amounts
# However, concentrations are used here, so compartment multiplication is for unit consistency if rates are per volume.
# Assuming rates are already in concentration/time.
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)


# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
# Kinetic law: k_conv_s1s2 * S1
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
# Reactant S1
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
# Product S2
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
# Kinetic Law
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")


# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
# Kinetic law: k_conv_s2s3 * S2
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
# Reactant S2
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
# Product S3
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
# Kinetic Law
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")


# Reaction 4: S3 ->
# Kinetic law: k_deg_s3 * S3
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
# Reactant S3
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
# Kinetic Law
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")


# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_2", current_sbml_model_str)
print("\nSBML model constructed with hypothesized reactions and parameters.")
# print(current_sbml_model_str) # Optional: print the SBML string for debugging

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data = simulate(current_sbml_model_str)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_2", sim_data)
print("\nSimulation of the hypothesized model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data summary:")
if sim_data is not None:
    print(sim_data.head())
    print(sim_data.describe())
    # Check for NaNs or extreme values in simulation
    if sim_data.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results contain NaNs.")
    if (sim_data.drop('Time', axis=1) > 1e6).any().any() or \
       (sim_data.drop('Time', axis=1) < -1e6).any().any() or \
       (sim_data.drop('Time', axis=1) < 1e-9).all().all() : # Check if all values are extremely small (potential issue)
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
else:
    print("Simulation failed to produce data.")

print("\nComparison of initial and final observed values:")
print(obs_data.iloc[[0, -1]])

if sim_data is not None:
    print("\nComparison of initial and final simulated values:")
    print(sim_data.iloc[[0, -1]])

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary:
        id_mkmu        id_3wq1   id_k51j      Time
0  0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00  0.000000  0.000000
1  1.004052e-14  1.145809e-123  0.008865  0.088652
2  5.280310e-13   5.938021e-97  0.017730  0.177305
3  7.917864e-12   2.905119e-88  0.026596  0.265957
4  7.966949e-11   3.298405e-80  0.035461  0.354610
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with hypothesized reactions and parameters.

Simulation of the hypothesized model completed.

Simulated data summary:
    id_mkmu   id_3wq1   id_k51j      Time
0  0.000000  0.000000  0.000000  0.000000
1  0.000695  0.000006  0.052490  0.088652
2  0.002731  0.000048  0.103603  0.177305
3  0.006037  0.000159  0.153374  0.265957
4  0.010546  0.000371  0.201839  0.354610
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.266972    0.240564    0.299006   12.500000
std      0.168238    0.129705    0.266372    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.127960    0.148109    0.092706    6.250000
50%      0.220085    0.202873    0.237544   12.500000
75%      0.395093    0.361934    0.342354   18.750000
max      0.594508    0.447592    1.022702   25.000000

Comparison of initial and final observed values:
      id_mkmu   id_3wq1   id_k51j  Time
0    0.000000  0.000000  0.000000   0.0
282  0.094251  0.115045  0.302801  25.0

Comparison of initial and final simulated values:
      id_mkmu   id_3wq1   id_k51j  Time
0    0.000000  0.000000  0.000000   0.0
282  0.241318  0.198198  0.234539  25.0

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 18/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 3
## Thoughts

The simulation results from Iteration 2, using the hypothesized repressilator-like model, showed oscillations but with discrepancies in amplitudes and potentially period compared to the observed data. Specifically, `id_k51j` (S1) peaked too high, and `id_3wq1` (S3) didn't peak high enough.

I will adjust the parameters to try and correct this:
*   To reduce the `id_k51j` peak:
    *   Decrease `k_prod_s1_max` (production rate of S1).
    *   Increase `k_conv_s1s2` (conversion rate of S1 to S2).
*   To increase the `id_3wq1` peak:
    *   Increase `k_conv_s2s3` (conversion rate of S2 to S3).
    *   Decrease `k_deg_s3` (degradation rate of S3).

Previous parameters:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.6
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.1
*   `n_hill`: 4.0
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.3
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.3
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.3

New parameter guesses for Iteration 3:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.45 (Was 0.6. Trying a moderate decrease first)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.1 (No change yet)
*   `n_hill`: 4.0 (No change yet)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.35 (Was 0.3. Slight increase)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.35 (Was 0.3. Slight increase)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.25 (Was 0.3. Slight decrease)

The plan is to:
1.  Retrieve the observed data.
2.  Re-construct the SBML model using the same structure as in Iteration 2 but with the new parameter values.
3.  Simulate the updated model.
4.  Print summaries of the observed and new simulated data for comparison.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary:")
print(obs_data.head())
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()
# compartment_id = model.getCompartment(0).getId() # Not strictly needed if formulas are concentration based

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 3
params_iteration_3 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.45,
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.1,
    "n_hill": 4.0,
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.35,
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.35,
    "k_deg_s3": 0.25
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_3.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it3 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_3", current_sbml_model_str_it3)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 3.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it3 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it3)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_3", sim_data_it3)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 3 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 3) summary:")
if sim_data_it3 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it3.head())
    print(sim_data_it3.describe())
    if sim_data_it3.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 3) contain NaNs.")
    # Check for extreme values or all very small values
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it3.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
       (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
       (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 3) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 3) failed to produce data.")

print("\nComparison of initial and final observed values (reminder):")
print(obs_data.iloc[[0, -1]])

if sim_data_it3 is not None:
    print("\nComparison of initial and final simulated values (Iteration 3):")
    print(sim_data_it3.iloc[[0, -1]])

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary:
        id_mkmu        id_3wq1   id_k51j      Time
0  0.000000e+00   0.000000e+00  0.000000  0.000000
1  1.004052e-14  1.145809e-123  0.008865  0.088652
2  5.280310e-13   5.938021e-97  0.017730  0.177305
3  7.917864e-12   2.905119e-88  0.026596  0.265957
4  7.966949e-11   3.298405e-80  0.035461  0.354610
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 3.

Simulation of the Iteration 3 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 3) summary:
    id_mkmu   id_3wq1   id_k51j      Time
0  0.000000  0.000000  0.000000  0.000000
1  0.000606  0.000006  0.039281  0.088652
2  0.002376  0.000049  0.077362  0.177305
3  0.005236  0.000162  0.114279  0.265957
4  0.009120  0.000377  0.150069  0.354610
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.184176    0.225763    0.202826   12.500000
std      0.123294    0.117353    0.186012    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.082743    0.146695    0.061439    6.250000
50%      0.156964    0.195424    0.154695   12.500000
75%      0.261627    0.332213    0.213117   18.750000
max      0.441265    0.416504    0.722727   25.000000

Comparison of initial and final observed values (reminder):
      id_mkmu   id_3wq1   id_k51j  Time
0    0.000000  0.000000  0.000000   0.0
282  0.094251  0.115045  0.302801  25.0

Comparison of initial and final simulated values (Iteration 3):
      id_mkmu   id_3wq1   id_k51j  Time
0    0.000000  0.000000  0.000000   0.0
282  0.164294  0.200914  0.137079  25.0

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 17/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 4
## Thoughts

The parameter adjustments in Iteration 3 improved the model's fit to the observed data, but there are still discrepancies.
Comparing mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter3):
- `id_mkmu`: 0.226 vs 0.184 (Simulated is lower)
- `id_3wq1`: 0.183 vs 0.226 (Simulated is higher)
- `id_k51j`: 0.319 vs 0.203 (Simulated is significantly lower)

Comparing max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter3):
- `id_mkmu`: 0.561 vs 0.441 (Simulated peak is lower)
- `id_3wq1`: 0.565 vs 0.417 (Simulated peak is lower)
- `id_k51j`: 0.519 vs 0.723 (Simulated peak is now higher, which is a change from Iteration 2 where it was too high and I tried to lower it. This suggests `k_prod_s1_max` might have been over-corrected or other parameters are interacting.)

The period and phase of the oscillations also need to be considered, but it's hard to judge precisely without plotting. The current parameter tuning is a bit like whack-a-mole.

Let's analyze the changes from Iteration 2 to Iteration 3:
Parameters (Iter2 -> Iter3):
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.6 -> 0.45 (Decreased)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.1 -> 0.1
*   `n_hill`: 4.0 -> 4.0
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.3 -> 0.35 (Increased)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.3 -> 0.35 (Increased)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.3 -> 0.25 (Decreased)

Observations:
- `id_k51j` (S1) mean went from 0.299 (Iter2) to 0.203 (Iter3). Observed is 0.319. So S1 is too low. This is mainly driven by `k_prod_s1_max` and `k_conv_s1s2`. Decreasing `k_prod_s1_max` and increasing `k_conv_s1s2` both contribute to lowering S1 levels. The max value of S1 (0.723) is higher than observed (0.519), which is a bit contradictory to the mean. This might indicate the oscillations are too sharp or the baseline is off.
- `id_mkmu` (S2) mean went from 0.267 (Iter2) to 0.184 (Iter3). Observed is 0.226. So S2 is too low. This is affected by `k_conv_s1s2` (source) and `k_conv_s2s3` (sink). Increasing both might have complex effects.
- `id_3wq1` (S3) mean went from 0.241 (Iter2) to 0.226 (Iter3). Observed is 0.183. So S3 is too high. This is affected by `k_conv_s2s3` (source) and `k_deg_s3` (sink). Increasing `k_conv_s2s3` and decreasing `k_deg_s3` both contribute to higher S3 levels.

It seems the system is quite sensitive. The goal is to get the means and peaks closer.
To increase `id_k51j` mean and potentially lower its peak:
    *   Increase `k_prod_s1_max` slightly from 0.45.
    *   Maybe slightly decrease `k_conv_s1s2` from 0.35 if S1 peak is too high.
    *   The inhibition strength `Ki_s3_s1` or `n_hill` might also play a role in shaping the peak and trough. A smaller `Ki_s3_s1` means stronger inhibition.

To increase `id_mkmu` mean and peak:
    *   Increase `k_conv_s1s2`.
    *   Maybe slightly decrease `k_conv_s2s3`.

To decrease `id_3wq1` mean and peak:
    *   Decrease `k_conv_s2s3`.
    *   Increase `k_deg_s3`.

Let's try these adjustments:
New parameter guesses for Iteration 4:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.5 (Was 0.45. Increase to boost S1 levels, observed mean is 0.319, sim mean 0.203)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.12 (Was 0.1. Slightly weaken inhibition to allow S1 to rise a bit more before being shut down, might help with S1 peak if it's too sharp)
*   `n_hill`: 4.0 (No change yet)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.32 (Was 0.35. Slight decrease to prevent S1 from depleting too fast, and to reduce S2 if it becomes too high)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.30 (Was 0.35. Decrease to reduce S3 levels, observed mean 0.183, sim mean 0.226)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.30 (Was 0.25. Increase to help reduce S3 levels)

The plan is:
1.  Retrieve the observed data.
2.  Re-construct the SBML model with these new parameter values.
3.  Simulate the updated model.
4.  Print summaries for comparison.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 4
params_iteration_4 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.50,  # Increased from 0.45
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.12,     # Increased from 0.1 (weaken inhibition slightly)
    "n_hill": 4.0,
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.32,  # Decreased from 0.35
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.30,  # Decreased from 0.35
    "k_deg_s3": 0.30      # Increased from 0.25
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_4.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it4 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_4", current_sbml_model_str_it4)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 4.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it4 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it4)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_4", sim_data_it4)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 4 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 4) summary:")
if sim_data_it4 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it4.describe())
    if sim_data_it4.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 4) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it4.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
       (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
       (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all(): # Check if all values are extremely small
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 4) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 4) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it4 is not None:
    print("\nComparison of initial and final simulated values (Iteration 4):")
    print(sim_data_it4.iloc[[0, -1]])
    
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 4):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it4['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it4['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it4['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 4):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it4['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it4['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it4['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 4.

Simulation of the Iteration 4 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 4) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.269871    0.240002    0.284749   12.500000
std      0.155546    0.121611    0.231599    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.143831    0.163741    0.101674    6.250000
50%      0.238312    0.215387    0.234213   12.500000
75%      0.379908    0.349387    0.316828   18.750000
max      0.575613    0.433332    0.896295   25.000000

Comparison of initial and final simulated values (Iteration 4):
      id_mkmu   id_3wq1   id_k51j  Time
0    0.000000  0.000000  0.000000   0.0
282  0.255341  0.224408  0.213184  25.0

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 4):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.270
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.240
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.285

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 4):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.576
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.433
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.896

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 16/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 5
## Thoughts

The parameter adjustments in Iteration 4 brought some simulated values closer to observed, while others diverged or overshot.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter4):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.270 (Simulated is now higher, was lower in Iter3)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.240 (Simulated is still higher, similar to Iter3)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.285 (Simulated is lower, but closer than Iter3's 0.203)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter4):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.576 (Simulated peak is very close, slightly higher)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.433 (Simulated peak is still too low)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.896 (Simulated peak is much too high)

Parameter changes from Iteration 3 to Iteration 4:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.45 -> 0.50 (Increased)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.1 -> 0.12 (Increased - weaker inhibition)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.35 -> 0.32 (Decreased)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.35 -> 0.30 (Decreased)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.25 -> 0.30 (Increased)

Analysis of changes and strategy:
1.  **`id_k51j` (S1) peak is too high (0.896 vs 0.519).** This is primarily due to `k_prod_s1_max` being too high or the inhibition (`Ki_s3_s1`, `n_hill`) not being strong/fast enough, or `k_conv_s1s2` being too low.
    *   Reduce `k_prod_s1_max`.
    *   Decrease `Ki_s3_s1` (stronger inhibition).
    *   The mean of S1 (0.285) is still a bit lower than observed (0.319). This suggests the oscillations might be too peaky.

2.  **`id_3wq1` (S3) peak is too low (0.433 vs 0.565), and mean is too high (0.240 vs 0.183).** This is a bit contradictory. A lower peak with a higher mean might suggest that S3 is not cleared fast enough or its production is too sustained at a moderate level.
    *   To increase peak: Increase `k_conv_s2s3` or decrease `k_deg_s3`.
    *   To decrease mean: Decrease `k_conv_s2s3` or increase `k_deg_s3`.
    *   The Hill coefficient `n_hill` for the S3 inhibition on S1 production affects the sharpness of the feedback. A higher `n_hill` makes the switch sharper. This could influence the oscillatory shape.

3.  **`id_mkmu` (S2) peak is good (0.576 vs 0.561), mean is a bit high (0.270 vs 0.226).**
    *   To decrease mean: Increase `k_conv_s2s3` (pushes S2 to S3 faster) or decrease `k_conv_s1s2` (reduces S2 production).

Let's try to address the S1 peak first, as it's the most off.
New parameter guesses for Iteration 5:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.40 (Was 0.50. Significant decrease to lower S1 peak)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.10 (Was 0.12. Revert to stronger inhibition to help lower S1 peak)
*   `n_hill`: 4.0 (No change yet. Could try increasing this later if oscillations need to be sharper or more sustained)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.35 (Was 0.32. Increase slightly to pull S1 down faster, and boost S2 which had a decent peak but slightly high mean. This might increase S2 mean further, so watch out.)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.35 (Was 0.30. Increase to boost S3 peak and potentially lower S2 mean by converting it faster)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.28 (Was 0.30. Slight decrease to help S3 peak rise, but this might worsen S3 mean. It's a trade-off.)

The strategy is to aggressively target the S1 peak, then see how S2 and S3 respond, and adjust their conversion/degradation rates. The `n_hill` parameter is still untouched; it might be useful for fine-tuning the oscillatory shape (e.g., making peaks sharper or troughs lower).

Plan:
1.  Retrieve observed data.
2.  Re-construct SBML model with new parameters.
3.  Simulate.
4.  Compare summaries.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 5
params_iteration_5 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.40,  # Decreased from 0.50
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.10,     # Decreased from 0.12 (stronger inhibition)
    "n_hill": 4.0,
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.35,  # Increased from 0.32
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.35,  # Increased from 0.30
    "k_deg_s3": 0.28      # Decreased from 0.30
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_5.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it5 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_5", current_sbml_model_str_it5)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 5.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it5 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it5)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_5", sim_data_it5)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 5 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 5) summary:")
if sim_data_it5 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it5.describe())
    if sim_data_it5.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 5) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it5.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
       (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
       (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 5) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 5) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it5 is not None:
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 5):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it5['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it5['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it5['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 5):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it5['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it5['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it5['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 5.

Simulation of the Iteration 5 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 5) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.183563    0.201796    0.201637   12.500000
std      0.110212    0.099827    0.167792    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.094754    0.139338    0.074163    6.250000
50%      0.163965    0.185177    0.158272   12.500000
75%      0.247115    0.286846    0.215740   18.750000
max      0.413485    0.365715    0.663166   25.000000

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 5):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.184
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.202
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.202

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 5):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.413
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.366
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.663

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 15/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4, current_model_sbml_iteration_5, sim_data_iteration_5)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 6
## Thoughts

The parameter adjustments in Iteration 5 had mixed results.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter5):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.184 (Simulated is lower, was 0.270 in Iter4. Overshot the correction.)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.202 (Simulated is slightly high, improved from 0.240 in Iter4.)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.202 (Simulated is significantly lower, was 0.285 in Iter4. Overshot the correction.)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter5):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.413 (Simulated peak is now too low, was 0.576 in Iter4.)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.366 (Simulated peak is still too low, similar to Iter4's 0.433 but worse.)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.663 (Simulated peak is still too high, but better than Iter4's 0.896.)

Parameter changes from Iteration 4 to Iteration 5:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.50 -> 0.40 (Decreased)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.12 -> 0.10 (Decreased - stronger inhibition)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.32 -> 0.35 (Increased)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.30 -> 0.35 (Increased)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.30 -> 0.28 (Decreased)

Analysis of changes and strategy:
1.  **`id_k51j` (S1):** Peak is 0.663 (Obs 0.519) - still too high. Mean is 0.202 (Obs 0.319) - too low. This suggests the oscillations are too "peaky" for S1 - high max, low mean.
    *   To lower peak: Decrease `k_prod_s1_max` further, or make inhibition stronger/faster (decrease `Ki_s3_s1` or increase `n_hill`).
    *   To raise mean: This is tricky if the peak is already high. Perhaps the degradation/conversion of S1 (`k_conv_s1s2`) is too fast relative to its production phase.

2.  **`id_mkmu` (S2):** Peak is 0.413 (Obs 0.561) - too low. Mean is 0.184 (Obs 0.226) - too low.
    *   To raise S2 levels (both peak and mean): Increase its production (`k_conv_s1s2 * S1`) or decrease its conversion (`k_conv_s2s3 * S2`). Since S1 mean is already low, increasing `k_conv_s1s2` might not be enough if S1 itself is limited.

3.  **`id_3wq1` (S3):** Peak is 0.366 (Obs 0.565) - too low. Mean is 0.202 (Obs 0.183) - slightly high.
    *   To raise peak: Increase its production (`k_conv_s2s3 * S2`) or decrease its degradation (`k_deg_s3`).
    *   To lower mean: Decrease production or increase degradation.

The system is interconnected. The low S1 mean is likely contributing to low S2 and subsequently low S3 peaks.
The S1 peak being too high while its mean is too low is a key issue. This could mean the production burst is too strong/short, or the inhibition kicks in too late or too weakly initially but then S1 is depleted too fast.

Let's try to moderate `k_prod_s1_max` and `Ki_s3_s1` to get the S1 peak closer, and adjust conversion rates.
The Hill coefficient `n_hill` (currently 4.0) makes the inhibition switch-like. If the oscillations are too spiky, sometimes a *lower* Hill coefficient can broaden the peaks if the system is not truly a sharp switch. However, for repressilators, high Hill coefficients are often needed for sustained oscillations. Let's keep `n_hill` at 4 for now.

New parameter guesses for Iteration 6:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.45 (Was 0.40. Iter4 was 0.50. Trying between Iter4 and Iter5. S1 peak was 0.896 then 0.663. Target 0.519)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.08 (Was 0.10. Make inhibition stronger to help cap S1 peak)
*   `n_hill`: 4.0
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.30 (Was 0.35. Decrease slightly. S1 mean was too low, S2 was also too low. If S1 production is better, this might balance S2.)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.40 (Was 0.35. Increase to boost S3 peak, as S3 peak was very low. This will also pull S2 down, so S2 production needs to be sufficient.)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.25 (Was 0.28. Decrease to help S3 peak rise further.)

This is an attempt to:
- Get S1 peak down (`k_prod_s1_max` adjustment, stronger `Ki_s3_s1`).
- Improve S1 mean by not converting it away *too* fast (`k_conv_s1s2` slight decrease).
- Significantly boost S3 peak (`k_conv_s2s3` increase, `k_deg_s3` decrease).
- S2 levels will depend on the new balance between S1 production/conversion and S2 conversion.

Plan:
1.  Retrieve observed data.
2.  Re-construct SBML model with new parameters.
3.  Simulate.
4.  Compare summaries.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 6
params_iteration_6 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.45,  # Adjusted from 0.40 (Iter5), 0.50 (Iter4)
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.08,     # Decreased from 0.10 (stronger inhibition)
    "n_hill": 4.0,
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.30,  # Decreased from 0.35
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.40,  # Increased from 0.35
    "k_deg_s3": 0.25      # Decreased from 0.28
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_6.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it6 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_6", current_sbml_model_str_it6)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 6.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it6 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it6)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_6", sim_data_it6)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 6 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 6) summary:")
if sim_data_it6 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it6.describe())
    if sim_data_it6.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 6) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it6.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
       (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
       (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 6) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 6) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it6 is not None:
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 6):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it6['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it6['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it6['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 6):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it6['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it6['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it6['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 6.

Simulation of the Iteration 6 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 6) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.142787    0.201829    0.206891   12.500000
std      0.100479    0.108681    0.187364    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.060112    0.123804    0.065686    6.250000
50%      0.116364    0.166676    0.157215   12.500000
75%      0.209490    0.302385    0.232270   18.750000
max      0.351833    0.378607    0.729450   25.000000

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 6):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.143
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.202
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.207

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 6):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.352
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.379
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.729

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 14/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4, current_model_sbml_iteration_5, sim_data_iteration_5, current_model_sbml_iteration_6, sim_data_iteration_6)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 7
## Thoughts

The parameter adjustments in Iteration 6 did not yield the desired improvements.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter6):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.143 (Simulated is much lower. Worsened from Iter5's 0.184)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.202 (Simulated is slightly high. Same as Iter5)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.207 (Simulated is significantly lower. Similar to Iter5's 0.202)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter6):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.352 (Simulated peak is much too low. Worsened from Iter5's 0.413)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.379 (Simulated peak is still too low. Slightly better than Iter5's 0.366, but far from target)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.729 (Simulated peak is still too high. Worsened from Iter5's 0.663)

Parameter changes from Iteration 5 to Iteration 6:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.40 -> 0.45 (Increased)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.10 -> 0.08 (Decreased - stronger inhibition)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.35 -> 0.30 (Decreased)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.35 -> 0.40 (Increased)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.28 -> 0.25 (Decreased)

Analysis of changes and strategy:
The attempt to simultaneously control S1 peak (via `k_prod_s1_max`, `Ki_s3_s1`) while boosting S3 (via `k_conv_s2s3`, `k_deg_s3`) and managing S1 mean (via `k_conv_s1s2`) seems to have pushed S2 levels down too much. The S1 peak also went up, which is counterintuitive given stronger inhibition `Ki_s3_s1=0.08`. This might mean that `k_prod_s1_max=0.45` is still too high for this `Ki_s3_s1` value, or the dynamics are more complex.

The S1 peak is a persistent issue. The mean of S1 is also consistently low.
S2 and S3 peaks are far too low.

It seems the overall "activity" or "flux" through the system is too low for S2 and S3, while S1 production is too spiky.

Let's reconsider the `n_hill` parameter. A very high Hill coefficient (like 4.0) creates a very steep switch. If the oscillations are not robust or the parameters are not perfectly tuned, this can lead to very sharp peaks or even damping. Perhaps a slightly lower `n_hill` could make the system more "manageable" by broadening the response curves, although it might also dampen oscillations if too low. Let's try `n_hill = 3`. This is still reasonably high for oscillations.

Revised strategy:
1.  **Address S1 peak and mean:**
    *   Slightly reduce `k_prod_s1_max` again.
    *   Keep `Ki_s3_s1` strong.
    *   Change `n_hill` to 3.
2.  **Boost S2 and S3 levels:**
    *   Increase `k_conv_s1s2` to get more S2 from S1. This requires S1 levels to be somewhat reasonable.
    *   Adjust `k_conv_s2s3` and `k_deg_s3` to aim for higher S3 peak without letting its mean get too high.

New parameter guesses for Iteration 7:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.42 (Was 0.45. Iter5 was 0.40. Small adjustment down)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.08 (Keep strong inhibition)
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 (Was 4.0. Reduce steepness of inhibition)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.38 (Was 0.30. Increase significantly to boost S2 production from S1)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.35 (Was 0.40. Slight decrease. S3 mean was okay, peak too low. If S2 increases, this might be enough for S3 peak without overshooting S3 mean too much)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.22 (Was 0.25. Further decrease to help S3 peak rise)

The main changes are reducing `n_hill`, significantly increasing `k_conv_s1s2` to get more material flowing to S2 and S3, and fine-tuning the S1 production and S3 degradation.

Plan:
1.  Retrieve observed data.
2.  Re-construct SBML model with new parameters.
3.  Simulate.
4.  Compare summaries.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 7
params_iteration_7 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.42,  # Adjusted from 0.45
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.08,     # Kept from 0.08
    "n_hill": 3.0,        # Changed from 4.0
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.38,  # Increased from 0.30
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.35,  # Decreased from 0.40
    "k_deg_s3": 0.22      # Decreased from 0.25
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_7.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it7 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_7", current_sbml_model_str_it7)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 7.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it7 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it7)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_7", sim_data_it7)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 7 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 7) summary:")
if sim_data_it7 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it7.describe())
    if sim_data_it7.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 7) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it7.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if sim_data_values is not None and not sim_data_values.empty: # Check if dataframe is not None and not empty
      if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all():
          print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 7) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
    elif sim_data_values is None or sim_data_values.empty:
        print("\nWarning: Simulation data values are None or empty after dropping Time column.")

else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 7) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it7 is not None:
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 7):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it7['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it7['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it7['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 7):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it7['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it7['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it7['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 7.

Simulation of the Iteration 7 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 7) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.158013    0.219150    0.159762   12.500000
std      0.110833    0.111444    0.155113    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.070037    0.146788    0.048665    6.250000
50%      0.121183    0.187596    0.117516   12.500000
75%      0.229223    0.321278    0.163334   18.750000
max      0.392847    0.396544    0.601324   25.000000

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 7):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.158
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.219
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.160

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 7):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.393
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.397
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.601

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 13/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4, current_model_sbml_iteration_5, sim_data_iteration_5, current_model_sbml_iteration_6, sim_data_iteration_6, current_model_sbml_iteration_7, sim_data_iteration_7)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 8
## Thoughts

The change to `n_hill = 3` in Iteration 7 showed some promise, particularly in reducing the S1 peak closer to the target, but overall levels for S2 and S3 remain too low, and S1 mean is also very low.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter7):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.158 (Simulated is low. Slightly better than Iter6's 0.143, but still far from 0.226)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.219 (Simulated is high. Worsened from Iter6's 0.202)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.160 (Simulated is very low. Worsened from Iter6's 0.207)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter7):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.393 (Simulated peak is too low. Better than Iter6's 0.352, but still far)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.397 (Simulated peak is too low. Similar to Iter6's 0.379)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.601 (Simulated peak is now closer! Iter6 was 0.729. This is a good improvement for S1 peak.)

Parameter changes from Iteration 6 to Iteration 7:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.45 -> 0.42 (Decreased)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.08 -> 0.08
*   `n_hill`: 4.0 -> 3.0 (Decreased)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.30 -> 0.38 (Increased)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.40 -> 0.35 (Decreased)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.25 -> 0.22 (Decreased)

Analysis and Strategy:
The S1 peak (`id_k51j`) is much better (0.601 vs obs 0.519). This suggests `n_hill=3` combined with current `k_prod_s1_max` and `Ki_s3_s1` is a good direction for S1 peak control.
However, the mean of S1 is extremely low (0.160 vs obs 0.319). This means S1 is not sustained enough.
Consequently, S2 and S3 (both mean and peak) are too low because there isn't enough S1 converting into S2.

Primary Goal: Increase the mean concentration of S1 without letting its peak get too high again. Then, ensure S2 and S3 can rise.

How to increase S1 mean while S1 peak is relatively okay?
*   The production rate `k_prod_s1_max` might need a slight boost, but carefully, to not overshoot the peak.
*   The inhibition strength `Ki_s3_s1` might be too strong if S1 is suppressed too much. Slightly increasing `Ki_s3_s1` (weaker inhibition) could allow S1 to persist a bit longer.
*   The conversion rate `k_conv_s1s2` pulls S1 down. If it's too high, S1 mean will be low. It was increased to 0.38 in Iter7.

Let's try:
1.  Slightly increase `k_prod_s1_max`.
2.  Slightly weaken inhibition by increasing `Ki_s3_s1`.
3.  Maintain `n_hill = 3`.
4.  Slightly decrease `k_conv_s1s2` to allow S1 to build up more.
5.  Adjust S2->S3 and S3 degradation to get their levels up, assuming S1/S2 levels improve.

New parameter guesses for Iteration 8:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.45 (Was 0.42. Increase slightly to boost S1 mean. S1 peak was 0.601, target 0.519. This might push peak up a bit, but hopefully manageable.)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.09 (Was 0.08. Weaken inhibition slightly to help S1 mean.)
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 (Keep)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.33 (Was 0.38. Decrease to let S1 accumulate more, hopefully boosting S1 mean and subsequently S2.)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.40 (Was 0.35. Increase to pull more S2 into S3, aiming for higher S3 peak. S3 mean was high, so this might worsen it if S2 increases a lot.)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.25 (Was 0.22. Increase slightly. S3 mean was high (0.219 vs 0.183). This should help lower S3 mean while we try to boost its peak via `k_conv_s2s3`.)

The goal is to get more "substance" into the cycle starting with S1, then propagate it. The S3 mean being high while its peak is low is still a concern, suggesting S3 might linger too much at low levels or not degrade fast enough after peaking.

Plan:
1.  Retrieve observed data.
2.  Re-construct SBML model with new parameters.
3.  Simulate.
4.  Compare summaries.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 8
params_iteration_8 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.45,  # Increased from 0.42
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.09,     # Increased from 0.08 (weaker inhibition)
    "n_hill": 3.0,        # Kept from 3.0
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.33,  # Decreased from 0.38
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.40,  # Increased from 0.35
    "k_deg_s3": 0.25      # Increased from 0.22
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_8.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it8 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_8", current_sbml_model_str_it8)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 8.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it8 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it8)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_8", sim_data_it8)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 8 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 8) summary:")
if sim_data_it8 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it8.describe())
    if sim_data_it8.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 8) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it8.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if sim_data_values is not None and not sim_data_values.empty:
      if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all():
          print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 8) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
    elif sim_data_values is None or sim_data_values.empty:
        print("\nWarning: Simulation data values are None or empty after dropping Time column.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 8) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it8 is not None:
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 8):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it8['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it8['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it8['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 8):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it8['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it8['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it8['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 8.

Simulation of the Iteration 8 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 8) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.160513    0.224983    0.211393   12.500000
std      0.101809    0.110922    0.174785    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.080943    0.157532    0.084167    6.250000
50%      0.132894    0.195726    0.164847   12.500000
75%      0.222888    0.322809    0.223237   18.750000
max      0.376508    0.404992    0.694492   25.000000

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 8):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.161
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.225
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.211

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 8):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.377
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.405
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.694

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 12/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4, current_model_sbml_iteration_5, sim_data_iteration_5, current_model_sbml_iteration_6, sim_data_iteration_6, current_model_sbml_iteration_7, sim_data_iteration_7, current_model_sbml_iteration_8, sim_data_iteration_8)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 9
## Thoughts

The parameter adjustments in Iteration 8 did not lead to significant improvements. The S1 peak is still too high, and S1 mean is too low. S2 and S3 levels (both mean and peak) are also too low.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter8):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.161 (Simulated low. Similar to Iter7's 0.158)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.225 (Simulated high. Similar to Iter7's 0.219)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.211 (Simulated low. Better than Iter7's 0.160, but still far from 0.319)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter8):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.377 (Simulated peak too low. Worse than Iter7's 0.393)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.405 (Simulated peak too low. Similar to Iter7's 0.397)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.694 (Simulated peak too high. Worsened from Iter7's 0.601)

Parameter changes from Iteration 7 to Iteration 8:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.42 -> 0.45 (Increased)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.08 -> 0.09 (Increased - weaker inhibition)
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 -> 3.0
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.38 -> 0.33 (Decreased)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.35 -> 0.40 (Increased)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.22 -> 0.25 (Increased)

Analysis and Strategy:
Increasing `k_prod_s1_max` and weakening inhibition (`Ki_s3_s1`) in Iteration 8 caused the S1 peak to go up again, which is undesirable. The S1 mean improved slightly but is still very low. Decreasing `k_conv_s1s2` did not help S1 mean enough and likely hurt S2 levels.

The core problem remains: S1 mean is too low, and this starves S2 and S3. The S1 peak needs to be controlled simultaneously.
The `n_hill=3` seemed to help S1 peak in Iteration 7 when `k_prod_s1_max` was 0.42 and `Ki_s3_s1` was 0.08. Let's go back towards those values for S1 control.

To boost S1 mean without excessively raising its peak:
-   The production `k_prod_s1_max` needs to be high enough.
-   The inhibition (`Ki_s3_s1`, `n_hill`) needs to cap the peak effectively but not overly suppress S1 during its "on" phase.
-   The conversion `k_conv_s1s2` shouldn't be so high that it drains S1 too quickly before S1 can reach a good average level.

Let's try to get S1 right first, focusing on its mean and peak.
Observed S1: mean=0.319, peak=0.519.
Iter7 S1: mean=0.160, peak=0.601 (params: k_prod=0.42, Ki=0.08, n_hill=3, k_conv_s1s2=0.38)
Iter8 S1: mean=0.211, peak=0.694 (params: k_prod=0.45, Ki=0.09, n_hill=3, k_conv_s1s2=0.33)

It seems `k_prod_s1_max=0.42` with `Ki_s3_s1=0.08` and `n_hill=3` (from Iter7) gave a better S1 peak (0.601) than Iter8. The S1 mean was very low (0.160). The `k_conv_s1s2=0.38` in Iter7 might have been too high, draining S1.

New parameter guesses for Iteration 9 (focus on S1, then S2/S3):
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.43 (Slightly higher than Iter7's 0.42, aiming for a bit more S1 overall)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.08 (Revert to Iter7's stronger inhibition to control S1 peak)
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 (Keep)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.25 (Was 0.33 in Iter8, 0.38 in Iter7. Significantly decrease to allow S1 mean to build up. This is a key change.)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.30 (Was 0.40. Decrease. If S2 levels rise due to lower `k_conv_s1s2` and higher S1 mean, we might not need such a high rate here to get S3 up. Also, S3 mean was too high.)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.30 (Was 0.25. Increase to help lower S3 mean, which was consistently high.)

The main idea is to let S1 build up more by reducing its conversion rate `k_conv_s1s2`. This should increase S1 mean. Then, with more S1 available, S2 levels should rise. The rates for S2->S3 and S3 degradation are adjusted to hopefully bring S3 closer to observed values.

Plan:
1.  Retrieve observed data.
2.  Re-construct SBML model with new parameters.
3.  Simulate.
4.  Compare summaries.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 9
params_iteration_9 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.43,  # Adjusted from 0.45 (Iter8), 0.42 (Iter7)
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.08,     # Reverted to 0.08 (Iter7 value, stronger inhibition)
    "n_hill": 3.0,        # Kept from 3.0
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.25,  # Significantly decreased from 0.33 (Iter8), 0.38 (Iter7)
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.30,  # Decreased from 0.40 (Iter8)
    "k_deg_s3": 0.30      # Increased from 0.25 (Iter8)
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_9.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it9 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_9", current_sbml_model_str_it9)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 9.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it9 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it9)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_9", sim_data_it9)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 9 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 9) summary:")
if sim_data_it9 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it9.describe())
    if sim_data_it9.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 9) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it9.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if sim_data_values is not None and not sim_data_values.empty:
      if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all():
          print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 9) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
    elif sim_data_values is None or sim_data_values.empty:
        print("\nWarning: Simulation data values are None or empty after dropping Time column.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 9) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it9 is not None:
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 9):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it9['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it9['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it9['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 9):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it9['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it9['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it9['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 9.

Simulation of the Iteration 9 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 9) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.213792    0.193998    0.285071   12.500000
std      0.120356    0.098544    0.215360    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.118722    0.132527    0.119565    6.250000
50%      0.168839    0.178872    0.214168   12.500000
75%      0.317833    0.285932    0.370183   18.750000
max      0.435252    0.341059    0.819360   25.000000

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 9):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.214
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.194
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.285

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 9):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.435
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.341
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.819

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 11/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4, current_model_sbml_iteration_5, sim_data_iteration_5, current_model_sbml_iteration_6, sim_data_iteration_6, current_model_sbml_iteration_7, sim_data_iteration_7, current_model_sbml_iteration_8, sim_data_iteration_8, current_model_sbml_iteration_9, sim_data_iteration_9)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 10
## Thoughts

Iteration 9 showed some improvements, particularly in the mean values, but also some regressions. The strategy of reducing `k_conv_s1s2` to boost S1 mean was partially successful.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter9):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.214 (Simulated mean is much closer! Was 0.161 in Iter8)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.194 (Simulated mean is close, slightly high. Was 0.225 in Iter8, so this is better)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.285 (Simulated mean is closer! Was 0.211 in Iter8)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter9):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.435 (Simulated peak is still too low, but better than Iter8's 0.377)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.341 (Simulated peak is much too low. Worse than Iter8's 0.405)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.819 (Simulated peak is way too high again. Worse than Iter8's 0.694 and Iter7's 0.601)

Parameter changes from Iteration 8 to Iteration 9:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.45 -> 0.43 (Decreased)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.09 -> 0.08 (Decreased - stronger inhibition)
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 -> 3.0
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.33 -> 0.25 (Decreased)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.40 -> 0.30 (Decreased)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.25 -> 0.30 (Increased)

Analysis and Strategy:
The S1 peak (`id_k51j`) shot up despite decreasing `k_prod_s1_max` and strengthening inhibition (`Ki_s3_s1`). This is likely because `k_conv_s1s2` was reduced significantly (0.33 to 0.25), meaning S1 is not being converted to S2 as quickly, allowing it to accumulate to a higher peak before inhibition fully kicks in.
The means for all species are the best they've been so far. This is encouraging.
The S2 peak improved but is still low. The S3 peak is very low.

Primary goals now:
1.  Drastically reduce S1 peak.
2.  Boost S2 and S3 peaks, while trying to maintain the good mean values.

To reduce S1 peak:
*   Decrease `k_prod_s1_max` significantly.
*   Keep `Ki_s3_s1` low (strong inhibition).
*   The current `k_conv_s1s2 = 0.25` seems to help the mean values, so try to keep it around there if S1 production can be managed.

To boost S2/S3 peaks:
*   If S1 mean is good, S2 production (`k_conv_s1s2 * S1`) should be okay.
*   Increase `k_conv_s2s3` to get more S3 from S2.
*   Decrease `k_deg_s3` to allow S3 to peak higher.

New parameter guesses for Iteration 10:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.35 (Was 0.43. Significant decrease to combat S1 peak of 0.819. Target S1 peak 0.519)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.07 (Was 0.08. Further strengthen inhibition slightly)
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 (Keep)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.28 (Was 0.25. Slight increase. If S1 production is lower, a slightly higher conversion might be needed to feed S2, but keep it low enough to help S1 mean.)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.40 (Was 0.30. Increase significantly to boost S3 peak from S2. S2 peak was 0.435, S3 peak 0.341. Target S2=0.561, S3=0.565)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.20 (Was 0.30. Decrease significantly to allow S3 to accumulate and peak higher. S3 mean was 0.194 (obs 0.183), so this might push S3 mean up, but peak is priority.)

The large S1 peak in Iteration 9 suggests that the system has the *capacity* to produce high concentrations, but it's not being channeled correctly or controlled. The focus is now on capping S1 production sharply, then ensuring the downstream flux is efficient enough to build S2 and S3 peaks.

Plan:
1.  Retrieve observed data.
2.  Re-construct SBML model with new parameters.
3.  Simulate.
4.  Compare summaries.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 10
params_iteration_10 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.35,  # Significantly decreased from 0.43
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.07,     # Decreased from 0.08 (stronger inhibition)
    "n_hill": 3.0,        # Kept from 3.0
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.28,  # Slightly increased from 0.25
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.40,  # Significantly increased from 0.30
    "k_deg_s3": 0.20      # Significantly decreased from 0.30
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_10.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it10 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_10", current_sbml_model_str_it10)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 10.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it10 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it10)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_10", sim_data_it10)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 10 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 10) summary:")
if sim_data_it10 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it10.describe())
    if sim_data_it10.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 10) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it10.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if sim_data_values is not None and not sim_data_values.empty:
      if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all():
          print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 10) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
    elif sim_data_values is None or sim_data_values.empty:
        print("\nWarning: Simulation data values are None or empty after dropping Time column.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 10) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it10 is not None:
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 10):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it10['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it10['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it10['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 10):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it10['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it10['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it10['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 10.

Simulation of the Iteration 10 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 10) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.113977    0.200480    0.175372   12.500000
std      0.082550    0.102983    0.158760    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.047507    0.128809    0.058914    6.250000
50%      0.078703    0.186734    0.116645   12.500000
75%      0.176822    0.297436    0.225052   18.750000
max      0.280180    0.353991    0.590500   25.000000

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 10):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.114
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.200
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.175

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 10):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.280
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.354
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.591

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 10/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4, current_model_sbml_iteration_5, sim_data_iteration_5, current_model_sbml_iteration_6, sim_data_iteration_6, current_model_sbml_iteration_7, sim_data_iteration_7, current_model_sbml_iteration_8, sim_data_iteration_8, current_model_sbml_iteration_9, sim_data_iteration_9, current_model_sbml_iteration_10, sim_data_iteration_10)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 11
## Thoughts

Iteration 10 successfully brought the S1 peak (`id_k51j`) much closer to the observed value. However, this came at the cost of significantly reducing the mean concentrations of all species, and the peaks of S2 (`id_mkmu`) and S3 (`id_3wq1`) are now very low.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter10):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.114 (Simulated mean very low. Was 0.214 in Iter9)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.200 (Simulated mean okay, slightly high. Was 0.194 in Iter9)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.175 (Simulated mean very low. Was 0.285 in Iter9)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter10):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.280 (Simulated peak very low. Was 0.435 in Iter9)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.354 (Simulated peak very low. Was 0.341 in Iter9, so slight improvement but still bad)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.591 (Simulated peak is good! Was 0.819 in Iter9. This is a key achievement.)

Parameter changes from Iteration 9 to Iteration 10:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.43 -> 0.35 (Decreased)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.08 -> 0.07 (Decreased - stronger inhibition)
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 -> 3.0
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.25 -> 0.28 (Increased slightly)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.30 -> 0.40 (Increased)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.30 -> 0.20 (Decreased)

Analysis and Strategy:
The S1 peak control is good. The problem is that the overall production of S1 (`k_prod_s1_max = 0.35`) is now too low to sustain adequate mean levels for S1, and consequently for S2 and S3.
We need to increase the overall "activity" or "amount" of material in the system, primarily by boosting S1 production, but without letting the S1 peak run away again.

This suggests that the balance between `k_prod_s1_max` and the inhibition parameters (`Ki_s3_s1`, `n_hill`) is critical. The current inhibition (`Ki_s3_s1=0.07`, `n_hill=3.0`) seems effective at capping the peak when `k_prod_s1_max` was 0.35.

If we increase `k_prod_s1_max` to get more S1 into the system (to raise means), we might need to adjust inhibition or conversion rates.
The `k_conv_s1s2` (S1 to S2) was 0.28. If S1 mean increases, this might be sufficient to feed S2.
The `k_conv_s2s3` (S2 to S3) was 0.40 and `k_deg_s3` was 0.20. These were attempts to boost S3 peak, but S2 levels were too low.

Let's try to:
1.  Increase `k_prod_s1_max` to boost all mean levels, especially S1.
2.  Keep the strong inhibition parameters (`Ki_s3_s1`, `n_hill`) that successfully capped the S1 peak in Iter10, or adjust them slightly if S1 peak overshoots with higher production.
3.  Adjust conversion rates to channel the increased S1 into S2 and S3 effectively.

New parameter guesses for Iteration 11:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.40 (Was 0.35. Increase to boost S1 mean. Target S1 mean 0.319, S1 peak 0.519. Iter10 S1 mean 0.175, peak 0.591)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.075 (Was 0.07. Slightly weaken inhibition. If `k_prod_s1_max` increases, the peak might rise. This gives a little more room but still keeps it strong.)
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 (Keep)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.30 (Was 0.28. Slight increase to help convert the hopefully increased S1 into S2.)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.35 (Was 0.40. Slight decrease. If S2 levels rise significantly, a very high S2->S3 rate might deplete S2 too fast or make S3 mean too high. S3 mean was 0.200 (obs 0.183) in Iter10.)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.25 (Was 0.20. Increase slightly to help control S3 mean if S3 production increases. S3 mean was a bit high.)

The main change is boosting `k_prod_s1_max`. The other parameters are adjusted to try and maintain control while allowing higher flux. The S1 peak is the most sensitive part to watch.

Plan:
1.  Retrieve observed data.
2.  Re-construct SBML model with new parameters.
3.  Simulate.
4.  Compare summaries.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 11
params_iteration_11 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.40,  # Increased from 0.35
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.075,    # Slightly increased (weakened inhibition) from 0.07
    "n_hill": 3.0,        # Kept from 3.0
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.30,  # Slightly increased from 0.28
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.35,  # Decreased from 0.40
    "k_deg_s3": 0.25      # Increased from 0.20
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_11.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it11 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_11", current_sbml_model_str_it11)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 11.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it11 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it11)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_11", sim_data_it11)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 11 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 11) summary:")
if sim_data_it11 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it11.describe())
    if sim_data_it11.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 11) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it11.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if sim_data_values is not None and not sim_data_values.empty:
      if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all():
          print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 11) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
    elif sim_data_values is None or sim_data_values.empty:
        print("\nWarning: Simulation data values are None or empty after dropping Time column.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 11) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it11 is not None:
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 11):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it11['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it11['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it11['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 11):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it11['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it11['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it11['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 11.

Simulation of the Iteration 11 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 11) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.158227    0.196490    0.202883   12.500000
std      0.101277    0.100557    0.171821    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.077403    0.131236    0.074438    6.250000
50%      0.123666    0.171564    0.153372   12.500000
75%      0.234031    0.289521    0.239087   18.750000
max      0.361037    0.353086    0.659788   25.000000

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 11):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.158
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.196
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.203

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 11):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.361
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.353
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.660

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 9/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4, current_model_sbml_iteration_5, sim_data_iteration_5, current_model_sbml_iteration_6, sim_data_iteration_6, current_model_sbml_iteration_7, sim_data_iteration_7, current_model_sbml_iteration_8, sim_data_iteration_8, current_model_sbml_iteration_9, sim_data_iteration_9, current_model_sbml_iteration_10, sim_data_iteration_10, current_model_sbml_iteration_11, sim_data_iteration_11)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 12
## Thoughts

Iteration 11 did not achieve the desired increase in mean values, and the S1 peak rose again.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter11):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.158 (Simulated mean still low. Iter10 was 0.114, Iter9 was 0.214)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.196 (Simulated mean okay, slightly high. Iter10 was 0.200, Iter9 was 0.194)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.203 (Simulated mean still low. Iter10 was 0.175, Iter9 was 0.285)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter11):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.361 (Simulated peak low. Iter10 was 0.280, Iter9 was 0.435)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.353 (Simulated peak low. Iter10 was 0.354, Iter9 was 0.341)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.660 (Simulated peak too high again. Iter10 was 0.591 - good, Iter9 was 0.819)

Parameter changes from Iteration 10 to Iteration 11:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.35 -> 0.40 (Increased)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.07 -> 0.075 (Increased - weaker inhibition)
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 -> 3.0
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.28 -> 0.30 (Increased slightly)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.40 -> 0.35 (Decreased)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.20 -> 0.25 (Increased)

Analysis and Strategy:
Increasing `k_prod_s1_max` from 0.35 to 0.40, even with slightly weaker inhibition (`Ki_s3_s1` from 0.07 to 0.075), caused the S1 peak to jump from 0.591 to 0.660. This indicates high sensitivity of S1 peak to `k_prod_s1_max` in this region of parameter space. The S1 mean did improve from 0.175 to 0.203, but not enough. S2 and S3 means and peaks are still lagging.

The S1 peak in Iteration 10 (0.591) was very close to the target (0.519). The parameters then were:
`k_prod_s1_max = 0.35`, `Ki_s3_s1 = 0.07`, `n_hill = 3.0`.
The main issue was low mean values across the board.

Perhaps the `k_conv_s1s2` rate is a key lever for S1 mean. If S1 is converted too slowly, it might peak high before enough S3 is made to inhibit it. If converted too fast, its mean will be low.
In Iteration 9, `k_conv_s1s2 = 0.25` gave good means (S1=0.285, S2=0.214, S3=0.194) but a very high S1 peak (0.819) with `k_prod_s1_max=0.43`, `Ki_s3_s1=0.08`.

Let's try to combine the S1 peak control from Iter10 with a strategy to boost means, possibly by adjusting `k_conv_s1s2` and ensuring downstream rates are adequate.

Strategy:
1.  Revert `k_prod_s1_max` and `Ki_s3_s1` to Iteration 10 values to regain S1 peak control.
    *   `k_prod_s1_max = 0.35`
    *   `Ki_s3_s1 = 0.07`
    *   `n_hill = 3.0`
2.  Adjust `k_conv_s1s2`. Iter10 had 0.28 (S1 mean 0.175). Iter9 had 0.25 (S1 mean 0.285 with higher k_prod). We need higher S1 mean than 0.175. Let's try a value between these, perhaps slightly lower than 0.28 to let S1 build up a bit more.
3.  Adjust S2->S3 and S3 degradation to get S2/S3 peaks and means up.

New parameter guesses for Iteration 12:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.36 (Slightly above Iter10's 0.35, to give a bit more substance, but keep it low for peak control)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.07 (Iter10 value for strong inhibition)
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 (Keep)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.26 (Iter10 was 0.28, Iter9 was 0.25. Trying a value in between to balance S1 mean and S2 supply)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.45 (Iter10 was 0.40. Increase to try and pull more S2 into S3 for a higher S3 peak. S2 peak was 0.280, S3 peak 0.354 in Iter10 - both very low)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.22 (Iter10 was 0.20. Slight increase. S3 mean was 0.200 (obs 0.183). If S3 production increases, this helps control its mean.)

The aim is to get the S1 peak right (around 0.5-0.6), then try to lift all mean values, and then specifically target S2 and S3 peaks. This is iterative. The S1 mean is crucial.

Plan:
1.  Retrieve observed data.
2.  Re-construct SBML model with new parameters.
3.  Simulate.
4.  Compare summaries.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 12
params_iteration_12 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.36,  # Slightly increased from 0.35 (Iter10)
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.07,     # Reverted to 0.07 (Iter10 value)
    "n_hill": 3.0,        # Kept from 3.0
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.26,  # Adjusted from 0.28 (Iter10) and 0.25 (Iter9)
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.45,  # Increased from 0.40 (Iter10)
    "k_deg_s3": 0.22      # Increased from 0.20 (Iter10)
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_12.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it12 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_12", current_sbml_model_str_it12)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 12.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it12 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it12)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_12", sim_data_it12)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 12 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 12) summary:")
if sim_data_it12 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it12.describe())
    if sim_data_it12.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 12) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it12.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if sim_data_values is not None and not sim_data_values.empty:
      if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all():
          print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 12) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
    elif sim_data_values is None or sim_data_values.empty:
        print("\nWarning: Simulation data values are None or empty after dropping Time column.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 12) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it12 is not None:
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 12):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it12['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it12['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it12['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 12):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it12['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it12['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it12['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 12.

Simulation of the Iteration 12 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 12) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.106121    0.190952    0.197167   12.500000
std      0.072168    0.096695    0.161158    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.048733    0.127539    0.077684    6.250000
50%      0.078271    0.172491    0.143658   12.500000
75%      0.158701    0.281366    0.248626   18.750000
max      0.253649    0.338812    0.616270   25.000000

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 12):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.106
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.191
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.197

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 12):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.254
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.339
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.616

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 8/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4, current_model_sbml_iteration_5, sim_data_iteration_5, current_model_sbml_iteration_6, sim_data_iteration_6, current_model_sbml_iteration_7, sim_data_iteration_7, current_model_sbml_iteration_8, sim_data_iteration_8, current_model_sbml_iteration_9, sim_data_iteration_9, current_model_sbml_iteration_10, sim_data_iteration_10, current_model_sbml_iteration_11, sim_data_iteration_11, current_model_sbml_iteration_12, sim_data_iteration_12)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 13
## Thoughts

Iteration 12 showed that the S1 peak (`id_k51j`) is reasonably controlled (0.616 vs obs 0.519), similar to Iteration 10 (0.591). However, the mean values for S1 (0.197) and S2 (0.106) are still far too low. S3 mean (0.191) is acceptable. S2 and S3 peaks (0.254 and 0.339 respectively) are also much too low.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter12):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.106 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.191 (Good)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.197 (Low)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter12):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.254 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.339 (Low)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.616 (Slightly high, but acceptable range)

Parameter changes from Iteration 11 to Iteration 12:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.40 -> 0.36 (Decreased)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.075 -> 0.07 (Decreased - stronger inhibition)
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 -> 3.0
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.30 -> 0.26 (Decreased)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.35 -> 0.45 (Increased)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.25 -> 0.22 (Decreased)

Analysis and Strategy:
The S1 peak is manageable with `k_prod_s1_max` around 0.35-0.36 and `Ki_s3_s1` around 0.07, `n_hill=3`.
The primary issue is the low mean of S1, which then starves S2 and S3.
The `k_conv_s1s2` parameter is critical for S1 mean. In Iter12, it was 0.26, and S1 mean was 0.197. In Iter9, `k_conv_s1s2` was 0.25, `k_prod_s1_max` was 0.43, and S1 mean was 0.285 (good!) but S1 peak was 0.819 (bad).

This suggests we need a `k_prod_s1_max` that is high enough to support a good S1 mean, coupled with a relatively low `k_conv_s1s2` to allow S1 to accumulate, BUT the inhibition must be strong enough to cap the S1 peak that would result from this higher production and slower conversion.

Let's try to increase `k_prod_s1_max` moderately from the Iter12 value, keep `k_conv_s1s2` low, and ensure inhibition is very strong.
The `n_hill` parameter might need to go back to 4 if `n_hill=3` isn't providing a sharp enough cut-off for a higher `k_prod_s1_max`. A higher `n_hill` makes the inhibition more switch-like.

Consider Iteration 9 parameters for S1 mean: `k_prod_s1_max=0.43`, `Ki_s3_s1=0.08`, `n_hill=3`, `k_conv_s1s2=0.25`. S1 mean was 0.285. S1 peak was 0.819.
Consider Iteration 10 parameters for S1 peak: `k_prod_s1_max=0.35`, `Ki_s3_s1=0.07`, `n_hill=3`. S1 peak was 0.591. S1 mean was 0.175.

We need S1 mean around 0.3 and S1 peak around 0.5-0.55.
If `k_prod_s1_max` is higher (e.g., 0.40-0.43) and `k_conv_s1s2` is low (e.g., 0.25), S1 will tend to rise. We need very effective inhibition.

New parameter guesses for Iteration 13:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.42 (Trying a higher value again, similar to Iter9, to boost S1 mean)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.06 (Was 0.07. Make inhibition even stronger to try and cap the peak from higher production)
*   `n_hill`: 3.5 (Increase from 3.0, to make the switch sharper. Not going full 4.0 yet)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.25 (Keep low, like Iter9, to help S1 mean)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.40 (Iter12 was 0.45. S3 mean was good. S2 levels were very low. If S2 increases, this might be okay for S3 peak.)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.25 (Iter12 was 0.22. S3 mean was 0.191 (obs 0.183). This is a slight increase to keep S3 mean in check if S3 production rises.)

The key changes are increasing `k_prod_s1_max`, significantly strengthening inhibition (`Ki_s3_s1` and `n_hill`), and keeping `k_conv_s1s2` low. This is a high-risk, high-reward attempt to get S1 mean up while controlling its peak.

Plan:
1.  Retrieve observed data.
2.  Re-construct SBML model with new parameters.
3.  Simulate.
4.  Compare summaries.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 13
params_iteration_13 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.42,  # Increased from 0.36 (Iter12)
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.06,     # Decreased from 0.07 (Iter12) - stronger inhibition
    "n_hill": 3.5,        # Increased from 3.0 (Iter12) - sharper switch
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.25,  # Decreased from 0.26 (Iter12), same as Iter9
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.40,  # Decreased from 0.45 (Iter12)
    "k_deg_s3": 0.25      # Increased from 0.22 (Iter12)
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_13.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it13 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_13", current_sbml_model_str_it13)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 13.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it13 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it13)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_13", sim_data_it13)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 13 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 13) summary:")
if sim_data_it13 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it13.describe())
    if sim_data_it13.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 13) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it13.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if sim_data_values is not None and not sim_data_values.empty:
      if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all(): # Check if all values are extremely small
          print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 13) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
    elif sim_data_values is None or sim_data_values.empty:
        print("\nWarning: Simulation data values are None or empty after dropping Time column.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 13) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it13 is not None:
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 13):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it13['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it13['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it13['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 13):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it13['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it13['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it13['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 13.

Simulation of the Iteration 13 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 13) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.121849    0.175648    0.210762   12.500000
std      0.085786    0.095746    0.185603    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.051632    0.103180    0.071674    6.250000
50%      0.089165    0.155712    0.149350   12.500000
75%      0.188341    0.267283    0.270405   18.750000
max      0.292134    0.324794    0.704812   25.000000

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 13):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.122
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.176
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.211

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 13):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.292
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.325
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.705

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 7/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4, current_model_sbml_iteration_5, sim_data_iteration_5, current_model_sbml_iteration_6, sim_data_iteration_6, current_model_sbml_iteration_7, sim_data_iteration_7, current_model_sbml_iteration_8, sim_data_iteration_8, current_model_sbml_iteration_9, sim_data_iteration_9, current_model_sbml_iteration_10, sim_data_iteration_10, current_model_sbml_iteration_11, sim_data_iteration_11, current_model_sbml_iteration_12, sim_data_iteration_12, current_model_sbml_iteration_13, sim_data_iteration_13)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 14
## Thoughts

Iteration 13, with increased `k_prod_s1_max` and stronger/sharper inhibition (`Ki_s3_s1=0.06`, `n_hill=3.5`), still resulted in an S1 peak (`id_k51j`) that is too high (0.705 vs obs 0.519). The mean values for S1 (0.211) and S2 (0.122) remain stubbornly low. S3 mean (0.176) is excellent. S2 and S3 peaks (0.292 and 0.325) are very low.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter13):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.122 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.176 (Excellent!)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.211 (Low)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter13):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.292 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.325 (Low)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.705 (Too high)

Parameter changes from Iteration 12 to Iteration 13:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.36 -> 0.42 (Increased)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.07 -> 0.06 (Decreased - stronger inhibition)
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 -> 3.5 (Increased - sharper switch)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.26 -> 0.25 (Decreased)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.45 -> 0.40 (Decreased)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.22 -> 0.25 (Increased)

Analysis and Strategy:
The S1 peak is very sensitive to `k_prod_s1_max`. Even with stronger inhibition, increasing production leads to overshoot. The S1 mean is not rising proportionally, suggesting S1 is produced in sharp, high bursts but doesn't persist.
The S3 mean being good is a positive sign.

It seems the strategy of using a low `k_conv_s1s2` (0.25) to boost S1 mean is not working as intended when `k_prod_s1_max` is high enough to cause peak issues. S1 is peaking high and then presumably being inhibited, without enough time at a moderate level.

Let's go back to the `k_prod_s1_max` value from Iteration 10 (`0.35`) which gave a good S1 peak (0.591) with `Ki_s3_s1=0.07` and `n_hill=3.0`. The problem then was very low means (S1=0.175, S2=0.114).

Perhaps the issue is that the oscillations are too fast, or the "on" phase of S1 is too short.
If the S1 peak is controlled (e.g. `k_prod_s1_max=0.35, Ki_s3_s1=0.07, n_hill=3.0`), how can we increase the *duration* or *average level* of S1 without increasing its peak too much?
-   A slightly higher `k_conv_s1s2` might actually help if it pulls S1 down from its peak faster, allowing S3 to drop and S1 production to restart sooner, potentially leading to more frequent, moderate oscillations rather than very sharp, low-mean ones. This is counterintuitive to the previous idea of *lowering* `k_conv_s1s2` to boost S1 mean.
-   The overall timescale of the oscillations might be governed by the sum of delays in the loop.

Let's try to get the S1 peak correct first, then work on the means and other peaks.
Iteration 10 parameters for S1: `k_prod_s1_max=0.35`, `Ki_s3_s1=0.07`, `n_hill=3.0`. S1 peak 0.591.
Let's try to refine this slightly to get S1 peak closer to 0.519.
Maybe `k_prod_s1_max = 0.33`.

Once S1 peak is good, we need to address the low means.
If S1 mean is low (e.g., 0.175 in Iter10), S2 and S3 will be starved.
The `k_conv_s1s2` in Iter10 was 0.28. S2 mean was 0.114, S2 peak 0.280.
The `k_conv_s2s3` in Iter10 was 0.40. S3 mean was 0.200, S3 peak 0.354.

New parameter guesses for Iteration 14:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.33 (Decrease from Iter10's 0.35, aiming for S1 peak ~0.52)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.07 (Keep from Iter10)
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 (Keep from Iter10)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.35 (Increase significantly from Iter10's 0.28. If S1 is produced at a lower rate, it needs to be converted efficiently to S2 to get S2 levels up. This might also help broaden S1's presence if it's consumed more steadily.)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.45 (Increase from Iter10's 0.40. To boost S3 peak from potentially higher S2.)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.28 (Increase from Iter10's 0.20. S3 mean was 0.200 (obs 0.183). This is to keep S3 mean from going too high if S3 production increases.)

This is a shift in strategy for `k_conv_s1s2`: instead of keeping it low to let S1 accumulate (which led to peak issues or still low mean), try a higher value to ensure efficient transfer to S2, assuming S1 production itself is now better controlled at its peak.

Plan:
1.  Retrieve observed data.
2.  Re-construct SBML model with new parameters.
3.  Simulate.
4.  Compare summaries.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 14
params_iteration_14 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.33,  # Decreased from 0.35 (Iter10)
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.07,     # Kept from 0.07 (Iter10)
    "n_hill": 3.0,        # Kept from 3.0 (Iter10)
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.35,  # Increased from 0.28 (Iter10)
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.45,  # Increased from 0.40 (Iter10)
    "k_deg_s3": 0.28      # Increased from 0.20 (Iter10)
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_14.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it14 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_14", current_sbml_model_str_it14)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 14.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it14 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it14)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_14", sim_data_it14)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 14 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 14) summary:")
if sim_data_it14 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it14.describe())
    if sim_data_it14.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 14) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it14.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if sim_data_values is not None and not sim_data_values.empty:
      if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all():
          print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 14) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
    elif sim_data_values is None or sim_data_values.empty:
        print("\nWarning: Simulation data values are None or empty after dropping Time column.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 14) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it14 is not None:
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 14):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it14['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it14['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it14['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 14):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it14['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it14['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it14['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 14.

Simulation of the Iteration 14 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 14) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.112763    0.159780    0.155300   12.500000
std      0.065723    0.073761    0.117607    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.064172    0.118875    0.075337    6.250000
50%      0.096897    0.147910    0.121632   12.500000
75%      0.141874    0.217821    0.149872   18.750000
max      0.258979    0.284549    0.489606   25.000000

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 14):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.113
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.160
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.155

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 14):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.259
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.285
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.490

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 6/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4, current_model_sbml_iteration_5, sim_data_iteration_5, current_model_sbml_iteration_6, sim_data_iteration_6, current_model_sbml_iteration_7, sim_data_iteration_7, current_model_sbml_iteration_8, sim_data_iteration_8, current_model_sbml_iteration_9, sim_data_iteration_9, current_model_sbml_iteration_10, sim_data_iteration_10, current_model_sbml_iteration_11, sim_data_iteration_11, current_model_sbml_iteration_12, sim_data_iteration_12, current_model_sbml_iteration_13, sim_data_iteration_13, current_model_sbml_iteration_14, sim_data_iteration_14)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 15
## Thoughts

Iteration 14 achieved an excellent S1 peak (`id_k51j`) of 0.490 (Observed 0.519). This is the best S1 peak control so far.
However, all mean values are now very low, and S2/S3 peaks are also very low.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter14):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.113 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.160 (Good, slightly low)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.155 (Very low)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter14):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.259 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.285 (Very low)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.490 (Excellent!)

Parameter changes from Iteration 13 to Iteration 14:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.42 -> 0.33 (Decreased)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.06 -> 0.07 (Increased - weaker inhibition)
*   `n_hill`: 3.5 -> 3.0 (Decreased - less sharp switch)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.25 -> 0.35 (Increased)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.40 -> 0.45 (Increased)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.25 -> 0.28 (Increased)

The parameters that gave the good S1 peak are:
`k_prod_s1_max = 0.33`, `Ki_s3_s1 = 0.07`, `n_hill = 3.0`.

Analysis and Strategy:
We have good S1 peak control. The main problem is the lack of "substance" in the system – low mean values for S1, S2, and consequently low peaks for S2, S3.
The increase in `k_conv_s1s2` to 0.35 in Iter14 (from 0.25 in Iter13) was intended to pull more S1 into S2, but since S1 production (`k_prod_s1_max=0.33`) was low, this just depleted S1 further, leading to low S1 mean.

We need to increase `k_prod_s1_max` to get more S1 into the system to raise the means, while carefully maintaining the S1 peak control.
The S1 peak was 0.490 with `k_prod_s1_max=0.33`. If we increase `k_prod_s1_max`, the peak will rise.
Target S1 peak is ~0.52. Target S1 mean is ~0.32.
Target S2 peak is ~0.56. Target S2 mean is ~0.23.
Target S3 peak is ~0.56. Target S3 mean is ~0.18.

Let's try a modest increase in `k_prod_s1_max` and see if the current inhibition (`Ki_s3_s1=0.07, n_hill=3.0`) can still keep the S1 peak from overshooting too much.
If S1 levels (mean and peak) rise appropriately, then S2 and S3 should follow if their conversion/degradation rates are set.

The `k_conv_s1s2` was 0.35 in Iter14. This might be too high if S1 production is limited. If we increase S1 production, this rate might be okay.
The `k_conv_s2s3` was 0.45 and `k_deg_s3` was 0.28. S3 mean was 0.160 (good), S3 peak 0.285 (low).

New parameter guesses for Iteration 15:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.38 (Increase from 0.33. Iter10 had 0.35 and S1 peak 0.591. This is a significant increase, hoping to boost means substantially.)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.07 (Keep from Iter14 - this gave good peak control with lower k_prod)
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 (Keep from Iter14)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.30 (Decrease from 0.35. If `k_prod_s1_max` is higher, we don't want to convert S1 away *too* quickly, to allow its mean to build. This is a sensitive balance.)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.40 (Decrease from 0.45. If S2 levels rise, this might be enough for S3. S3 mean was good, S3 peak was low.)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.25 (Decrease from 0.28. To help S3 peak rise, while S3 mean was already good.)

The main bet is that increasing `k_prod_s1_max` to 0.38 will provide enough material, and the existing inhibition parameters will keep the S1 peak from going wild. Then, slightly reducing `k_conv_s1s2` should help S1 mean. Adjusting S2->S3 and S3 degradation aims to improve their peaks.

Plan:
1.  Retrieve observed data.
2.  Re-construct SBML model with new parameters.
3.  Simulate.
4.  Compare summaries.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 15
params_iteration_15 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.38,  # Increased from 0.33 (Iter14)
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.07,     # Kept from 0.07 (Iter14)
    "n_hill": 3.0,        # Kept from 3.0 (Iter14)
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.30,  # Decreased from 0.35 (Iter14)
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.40,  # Decreased from 0.45 (Iter14)
    "k_deg_s3": 0.25      # Decreased from 0.28 (Iter14)
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_15.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it15 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_15", current_sbml_model_str_it15)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 15.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it15 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it15)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_15", sim_data_it15)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 15 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 15) summary:")
if sim_data_it15 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it15.describe())
    if sim_data_it15.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 15) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it15.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if sim_data_values is not None and not sim_data_values.empty:
      if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all():
          print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 15) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
    elif sim_data_values is None or sim_data_values.empty:
        print("\nWarning: Simulation data values are None or empty after dropping Time column.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 15) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it15 is not None:
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 15):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it15['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it15['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it15['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 15):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it15['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it15['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it15['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 15.

Simulation of the Iteration 15 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 15) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.129861    0.183152    0.188179   12.500000
std      0.083543    0.092369    0.154882    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.064011    0.124563    0.074076    6.250000
50%      0.103698    0.154666    0.147920   12.500000
75%      0.186305    0.266920    0.214513   18.750000
max      0.303086    0.330789    0.607730   25.000000

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 15):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.130
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.183
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.188

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 15):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.303
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.331
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.608

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 5/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4, current_model_sbml_iteration_5, sim_data_iteration_5, current_model_sbml_iteration_6, sim_data_iteration_6, current_model_sbml_iteration_7, sim_data_iteration_7, current_model_sbml_iteration_8, sim_data_iteration_8, current_model_sbml_iteration_9, sim_data_iteration_9, current_model_sbml_iteration_10, sim_data_iteration_10, current_model_sbml_iteration_11, sim_data_iteration_11, current_model_sbml_iteration_12, sim_data_iteration_12, current_model_sbml_iteration_13, sim_data_iteration_13, current_model_sbml_iteration_14, sim_data_iteration_14, current_model_sbml_iteration_15, sim_data_iteration_15)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 16
## Thoughts

Iteration 15 showed some progress: S3 mean is now perfect (0.183 vs obs 0.183). S1 peak is 0.608 (obs 0.519), which is acceptable. However, S1 mean (0.188) and S2 mean (0.130) are still very low. S2 peak (0.303) and S3 peak (0.331) are also very low.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter15):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.130 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.183 (Perfect!)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.188 (Low)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter15):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.303 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.331 (Low)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.608 (Acceptable, slightly high)

Parameter changes from Iteration 14 to Iteration 15:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.33 -> 0.38 (Increased)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.07 -> 0.07
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 -> 3.0
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.35 -> 0.30 (Decreased)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.45 -> 0.40 (Decreased)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.28 -> 0.25 (Decreased)

Analysis and Strategy:
The increase in `k_prod_s1_max` to 0.38 helped S1 mean slightly (0.155 to 0.188) and S2 mean slightly (0.113 to 0.130). The S1 peak went from 0.490 to 0.608.
The S3 mean is excellent, which suggests the balance of `k_conv_s2s3` (0.40) and `k_deg_s3` (0.25) is good for the S3 average level, given the current S2 input.

The main challenge remains:
1.  Increase S1 mean (target 0.319) without S1 peak (target 0.519) overshooting too much. Current S1 peak 0.608 is on the higher side of acceptable.
2.  Increase S2 mean (target 0.226) and S2 peak (target 0.561).
3.  Increase S3 peak (target 0.565) while maintaining S3 mean.

If S1 mean increases, S2 levels should follow if `k_conv_s1s2` is appropriate.
The current `k_conv_s1s2 = 0.30`.
If `k_prod_s1_max` is increased further, the S1 peak will likely go higher. We might need slightly stronger/sharper inhibition.

Let's try to push `k_prod_s1_max` a bit more, and adjust inhibition slightly.
If S1 mean gets closer to 0.3, then S2 should also rise.
The S3 peak needs a significant boost. This requires more S2 feeding into it, and perhaps a slightly slower S3 degradation if the mean allows. Since S3 mean is perfect, we should be cautious with `k_deg_s3`.

New parameter guesses for Iteration 16:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.40 (Increase from 0.38. Aiming to boost S1 mean further. S1 peak might go to ~0.65-0.7, which is high, but let's see effect on mean.)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.07 (Keep. If S1 peak is too high, next step is to decrease this or increase n_hill)
*   `n_hill`: 3.2 (Slight increase from 3.0, to make inhibition a bit sharper to counteract higher k_prod_s1_max)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.32 (Slight increase from 0.30. If S1 mean increases, this helps channel it to S2.)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.45 (Increase from 0.40. To drive S3 peak higher, assuming S2 levels improve.)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.25 (Keep. S3 mean is perfect. If S3 peak rises due to more input, this degradation rate might still hold the mean.)

This is a push on S1 production, with a slight sharpening of inhibition. Then, trying to get more flux through S2 to S3 for higher peaks.

Plan:
1.  Retrieve observed data.
2.  Re-construct SBML model with new parameters.
3.  Simulate.
4.  Compare summaries.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 16
params_iteration_16 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.40,  # Increased from 0.38 (Iter15)
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.07,     # Kept from 0.07 (Iter15)
    "n_hill": 3.2,        # Increased from 3.0 (Iter15)
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.32,  # Increased from 0.30 (Iter15)
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.45,  # Increased from 0.40 (Iter15)
    "k_deg_s3": 0.25      # Kept from 0.25 (Iter15)
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_16.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it16 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_16", current_sbml_model_str_it16)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 16.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it16 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it16)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_16", sim_data_it16)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 16 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 16) summary:")
if sim_data_it16 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it16.describe())
    if sim_data_it16.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 16) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it16.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if sim_data_values is not None and not sim_data_values.empty:
      if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all():
          print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 16) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
    elif sim_data_values is None or sim_data_values.empty:
        print("\nWarning: Simulation data values are None or empty after dropping Time column.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 16) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it16 is not None:
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 16):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it16['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it16['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it16['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 16):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it16['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it16['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it16['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 16.

Simulation of the Iteration 16 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 16) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.115853    0.183022    0.174799   12.500000
std      0.077675    0.092147    0.148971    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.055375    0.123563    0.068564    6.250000
50%      0.095899    0.156909    0.132616   12.500000
75%      0.158910    0.264469    0.184074   18.750000
max      0.285111    0.336642    0.597387   25.000000

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 16):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.116
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.183
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.175

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 16):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.285
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.337
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.597

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 4/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4, current_model_sbml_iteration_5, sim_data_iteration_5, current_model_sbml_iteration_6, sim_data_iteration_6, current_model_sbml_iteration_7, sim_data_iteration_7, current_model_sbml_iteration_8, sim_data_iteration_8, current_model_sbml_iteration_9, sim_data_iteration_9, current_model_sbml_iteration_10, sim_data_iteration_10, current_model_sbml_iteration_11, sim_data_iteration_11, current_model_sbml_iteration_12, sim_data_iteration_12, current_model_sbml_iteration_13, sim_data_iteration_13, current_model_sbml_iteration_14, sim_data_iteration_14, current_model_sbml_iteration_15, sim_data_iteration_15, current_model_sbml_iteration_16, sim_data_iteration_16)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 17
## Thoughts

Iteration 16 results are very similar to Iteration 15. S3 mean is perfect. S1 peak is good (0.597 vs obs 0.519). However, S1 mean (0.175) and S2 mean (0.116) are very low. S2 peak (0.285) and S3 peak (0.337) are also very low.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter16):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.116 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.183 (Perfect!)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.175 (Very low)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter16):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.285 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.337 (Low)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.597 (Good, slightly high)

Parameter changes from Iteration 15 to Iteration 16:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.38 -> 0.40 (Increased)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.07 -> 0.07
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 -> 3.2 (Increased - sharper inhibition)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.30 -> 0.32 (Increased)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.40 -> 0.45 (Increased)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.25 -> 0.25

Analysis and Strategy:
Increasing `k_prod_s1_max` from 0.38 to 0.40, and `n_hill` from 3.0 to 3.2, did not significantly improve the S1 mean (0.188 to 0.175 - actually worsened slightly) or S2 mean (0.130 to 0.116 - worsened). The S1 peak remained fairly stable (0.608 to 0.597).
This suggests that simply pushing `k_prod_s1_max` higher with the current inhibition strategy isn't effectively raising the *average* amount of S1. The system seems to be producing S1 in bursts that are quickly shut down, without enough accumulation.

The S3 mean is consistently good with `k_deg_s3 = 0.25` and `k_conv_s2s3` around 0.40-0.45, given the low S2 input.

We need a breakthrough for S1 mean and S2 levels.
Perhaps the `k_conv_s1s2` rate is still too high, draining S1 before it can establish a higher average.
In Iteration 9, `k_prod_s1_max=0.43`, `Ki_s3_s1=0.08`, `n_hill=3.0`, `k_conv_s1s2=0.25`.
S1 mean was 0.285 (best so far), S2 mean 0.214 (best so far). S1 peak was 0.819 (too high).

Let's try to replicate the conditions that gave good means in Iter9 for S1 and S2, but with stronger/sharper inhibition to control the S1 peak.
The S1 peak in Iter16 (0.597) was good with `k_prod_s1_max=0.40`, `Ki_s3_s1=0.07`, `n_hill=3.2`.

What if we use `k_prod_s1_max` from Iter16 (0.40), but the `k_conv_s1s2` from Iter9 (0.25)?
And we need strong inhibition. `Ki_s3_s1=0.07` and `n_hill=3.2` (from Iter16) gave a good S1 peak with `k_prod_s1_max=0.40`.

New parameter guesses for Iteration 17:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.40 (Keep from Iter16, which gave good S1 peak with its inhibition params)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.07 (Keep from Iter16)
*   `n_hill`: 3.2 (Keep from Iter16)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.25 (Change to Iter9 value. This is the key change, hoping to boost S1 and S2 means.)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.40 (Slightly lower than Iter16's 0.45. If S2 levels rise significantly, this might be enough for S3. S3 mean was perfect, S3 peak low.)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.22 (Decrease from 0.25. S3 mean is perfect, but S3 peak is low. If S2 input increases, we might need to allow S3 to accumulate more for its peak, this might make S3 mean slightly higher.)

The hypothesis is that `k_prod_s1_max=0.40` with `Ki_s3_s1=0.07, n_hill=3.2` can control the S1 peak. Then, a lower `k_conv_s1s2=0.25` will allow S1 mean to rise, which should then propagate to S2. The S3 parameters are adjusted to aim for a higher peak while trying to keep the mean close.

This is a critical iteration. If S1 and S2 means improve significantly while S1 peak remains controlled, we are on the right track.

Plan:
1.  Retrieve observed data.
2.  Re-construct SBML model with new parameters.
3.  Simulate.
4.  Compare summaries.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 17
params_iteration_17 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.40,  # Kept from 0.40 (Iter16)
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.07,     # Kept from 0.07 (Iter16)
    "n_hill": 3.2,        # Kept from 3.2 (Iter16)
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.25,  # Changed to 0.25 (Iter9 value) from 0.32 (Iter16)
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.40,  # Decreased from 0.45 (Iter16)
    "k_deg_s3": 0.22      # Decreased from 0.25 (Iter16)
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_17.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it17 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_17", current_sbml_model_str_it17)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 17.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it17 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it17)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_17", sim_data_it17)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 17 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 17) summary:")
if sim_data_it17 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it17.describe())
    if sim_data_it17.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 17) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it17.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if sim_data_values is not None and not sim_data_values.empty:
      if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all():
          print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 17) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
    elif sim_data_values is None or sim_data_values.empty:
        print("\nWarning: Simulation data values are None or empty after dropping Time column.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 17) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it17 is not None:
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 17):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it17['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it17['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it17['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 17):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it17['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it17['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it17['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 17.

Simulation of the Iteration 17 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 17) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.124739    0.202645    0.214690   12.500000
std      0.088431    0.106674    0.188530    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.052325    0.124127    0.073483    6.250000
50%      0.087075    0.188801    0.143806   12.500000
75%      0.195587    0.304214    0.286358   18.750000
max      0.298685    0.362331    0.701116   25.000000

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 17):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.125
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.203
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.215

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 17):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.299
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.362
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.701

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 3/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4, current_model_sbml_iteration_5, sim_data_iteration_5, current_model_sbml_iteration_6, sim_data_iteration_6, current_model_sbml_iteration_7, sim_data_iteration_7, current_model_sbml_iteration_8, sim_data_iteration_8, current_model_sbml_iteration_9, sim_data_iteration_9, current_model_sbml_iteration_10, sim_data_iteration_10, current_model_sbml_iteration_11, sim_data_iteration_11, current_model_sbml_iteration_12, sim_data_iteration_12, current_model_sbml_iteration_13, sim_data_iteration_13, current_model_sbml_iteration_14, sim_data_iteration_14, current_model_sbml_iteration_15, sim_data_iteration_15, current_model_sbml_iteration_16, sim_data_iteration_16, current_model_sbml_iteration_17, sim_data_iteration_17)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 18
## Thoughts

Iteration 17 did not yield the hoped-for improvements. The S1 peak (`id_k51j`) is too high (0.701 vs obs 0.519). S1 mean (0.215) and S2 mean (0.125) are still very low. S3 mean (0.203) is a bit high. S2 peak (0.299) and S3 peak (0.362) are very low.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter17):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.125 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.203 (Slightly high)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.215 (Low)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter17):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.299 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.362 (Low)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.701 (Too high)

Parameter changes from Iteration 16 to Iteration 17:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.40 -> 0.40
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.07 -> 0.07
*   `n_hill`: 3.2 -> 3.2
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.32 -> 0.25 (Decreased)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.45 -> 0.40 (Decreased)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.25 -> 0.22 (Decreased)

The key change was decreasing `k_conv_s1s2` from 0.32 to 0.25, hoping to boost S1 mean. While S1 mean did increase from 0.175 (Iter16) to 0.215 (Iter17), the S1 peak also increased from 0.597 to 0.701. This indicates that with `k_prod_s1_max=0.40`, the inhibition (`Ki_s3_s1=0.07, n_hill=3.2`) is not strong enough if S1 is not converted away quickly enough.

We are running out of iterations. The model structure seems plausible (repressilator), but parameter tuning is difficult.
The best S1 peak control was in Iteration 14: `k_prod_s1_max=0.33, Ki_s3_s1=0.07, n_hill=3.0` giving S1 peak 0.490. But all means were very low.

Let's try to build upon Iteration 14's S1 peak control.
Parameters from Iter14:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.33
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.07
*   `n_hill`: 3.0
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.35
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.45
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.28

Results from Iter14:
S1 mean 0.155 (target 0.319), S1 peak 0.490 (target 0.519) - Peak OK, Mean LOW
S2 mean 0.113 (target 0.226), S2 peak 0.259 (target 0.561) - Both LOW
S3 mean 0.160 (target 0.183), S3 peak 0.285 (target 0.565) - Mean OK, Peak LOW

The main issue with Iter14 was low overall substance. S1 peak was good.
To increase S1 mean from 0.155 towards 0.319, we need more S1 production.
If we increase `k_prod_s1_max` from 0.33, the peak of 0.490 will rise. We want it to rise to about 0.52-0.55.
Let's try `k_prod_s1_max = 0.35` (as in Iter10, which gave S1 peak 0.591 with these inhibition params). This might be a good balance.

With `k_prod_s1_max = 0.35`, `Ki_s3_s1 = 0.07`, `n_hill = 3.0`:
Iter10 S1 mean was 0.175, S1 peak 0.591.
Iter10 `k_conv_s1s2` was 0.28. S2 mean 0.114, S2 peak 0.280.
Iter10 `k_conv_s2s3` was 0.40. S3 mean 0.200, S3 peak 0.354.

The S1 mean (0.175) is still too low.
The `k_conv_s1s2` rate is crucial. If it's too high, S1 mean drops. If too low, S1 peak might rise if production is high.
Let's use the Iter10 S1 production/inhibition parameters as a base, as S1 peak was decent (0.591).
`k_prod_s1_max = 0.35`, `Ki_s3_s1 = 0.07`, `n_hill = 3.0`.

Now, to improve S1 mean (target 0.319, current ~0.175) and S2 mean (target 0.226, current ~0.114) and S2 peak (target 0.561, current ~0.280).
And S3 peak (target 0.565, current ~0.354) while S3 mean is ~0.200 (target 0.183).

If we decrease `k_conv_s1s2` from Iter10's 0.28, S1 mean should rise. Let's try `k_conv_s1s2 = 0.22`. This is lower than Iter9's 0.25.
If S1 mean rises, S2 levels should rise.
Then, for S3, `k_conv_s2s3` needs to be high enough to get a good peak, and `k_deg_s3` to control the mean.
Iter10: `k_conv_s2s3=0.40`, `k_deg_s3=0.20`. S3 mean 0.200 (a bit high), S3 peak 0.354 (low).

New parameter guesses for Iteration 18 (based on Iter10, but aiming for higher S1/S2 means):
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.35 (Iter10 value)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.07 (Iter10 value)
*   `n_hill`: 3.0 (Iter10 value)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.22 (Decrease from Iter10's 0.28, to boost S1 mean)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.50 (Increase from Iter10's 0.40, to aggressively boost S3 peak from hopefully higher S2)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.28 (Increase from Iter10's 0.20. S3 mean was 0.200. If S3 production increases a lot, this higher degradation will be needed to keep S3 mean near 0.183.)

This is a focused attempt to leverage the good S1 peak control of Iter10, but significantly boost S1 mean by slowing its conversion, and then aggressively push for S2/S3 peaks.

Plan:
1.  Retrieve observed data.
2.  Re-construct SBML model with new parameters.
3.  Simulate.
4.  Compare summaries.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 18
params_iteration_18 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.35,  # Iter10 value
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.07,     # Iter10 value
    "n_hill": 3.0,        # Iter10 value
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.22,  # Decreased from 0.28 (Iter10)
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.50,  # Increased from 0.40 (Iter10)
    "k_deg_s3": 0.28      # Increased from 0.20 (Iter10)
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_18.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it18 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_18", current_sbml_model_str_it18)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 18.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it18 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it18)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_18", sim_data_it18)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 18 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 18) summary:")
if sim_data_it18 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it18.describe())
    if sim_data_it18.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 18) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it18.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if sim_data_values is not None and not sim_data_values.empty:
      if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all():
          print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 18) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
    elif sim_data_values is None or sim_data_values.empty:
        print("\nWarning: Simulation data values are None or empty after dropping Time column.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 18) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it18 is not None:
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 18):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it18['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it18['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it18['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 18):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it18['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it18['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it18['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 18.

Simulation of the Iteration 18 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 18) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.103430    0.164352    0.251492   12.500000
std      0.057819    0.078660    0.161001    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.059640    0.120328    0.132025    6.250000
50%      0.085025    0.142687    0.205075   12.500000
75%      0.144731    0.234271    0.309335   18.750000
max      0.220298    0.286560    0.656042   25.000000

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 18):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.103
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.164
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.251

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 18):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.220
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.287
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.656

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 2/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4, current_model_sbml_iteration_5, sim_data_iteration_5, current_model_sbml_iteration_6, sim_data_iteration_6, current_model_sbml_iteration_7, sim_data_iteration_7, current_model_sbml_iteration_8, sim_data_iteration_8, current_model_sbml_iteration_9, sim_data_iteration_9, current_model_sbml_iteration_10, sim_data_iteration_10, current_model_sbml_iteration_11, sim_data_iteration_11, current_model_sbml_iteration_12, sim_data_iteration_12, current_model_sbml_iteration_13, sim_data_iteration_13, current_model_sbml_iteration_14, sim_data_iteration_14, current_model_sbml_iteration_15, sim_data_iteration_15, current_model_sbml_iteration_16, sim_data_iteration_16, current_model_sbml_iteration_17, sim_data_iteration_17, current_model_sbml_iteration_18, sim_data_iteration_18)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 19
## Thoughts

Iteration 18 showed some improvement in S1 mean (0.251 vs obs 0.319), which is the best S1 mean so far. However, the S1 peak is now too high (0.656 vs obs 0.519). S2 mean (0.103) and S3 mean (0.164) are low. S2 peak (0.220) and S3 peak (0.287) are very low.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter18):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.103 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.164 (Good, slightly low)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.251 (Getting closer, but still low)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter18):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.220 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.287 (Very low)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.656 (Too high)

Parameter changes from Iteration 17 (approx comparison as Iter17 was different base) to Iteration 18:
Iter18 params:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.35
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.07
*   `n_hill`: 3.0
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.22 (This was the key change to boost S1 mean)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.50
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.28

Analysis and Strategy:
The strategy of using `k_prod_s1_max=0.35` and `Ki_s3_s1=0.07, n_hill=3.0` (from Iter10) and then lowering `k_conv_s1s2` to 0.22 did help S1 mean (from Iter10's 0.175 to 0.251). However, it also pushed the S1 peak from Iter10's 0.591 to 0.656.
This means that slowing S1 conversion (lower `k_conv_s1s2`) allows S1 to accumulate more, increasing both its mean and its peak. The current inhibition is not quite enough for `k_prod_s1_max=0.35` when `k_conv_s1s2` is this low.

We need to:
1.  Reduce S1 peak from 0.656 to ~0.52. This likely means slightly reducing `k_prod_s1_max` OR strengthening/sharpening inhibition (`Ki_s3_s1`, `n_hill`).
2.  Try to maintain or slightly improve S1 mean (0.251).
3.  Significantly boost S2 mean (0.103 -> 0.226) and S2 peak (0.220 -> 0.561).
4.  Significantly boost S3 peak (0.287 -> 0.565) while keeping S3 mean (0.164 -> 0.183).

Let's try to get the S1 peak down by slightly reducing `k_prod_s1_max` from 0.35.
If `k_prod_s1_max=0.33` (Iter14) gave S1 peak 0.490 with `Ki_s3_s1=0.07, n_hill=3.0, k_conv_s1s2=0.35`.
The current `k_conv_s1s2=0.22` is much lower, which tends to increase S1 peak.
So, if we use `k_prod_s1_max=0.33` with `k_conv_s1s2=0.22`, the S1 peak might be lower than 0.656, hopefully in the right range. This should also lower S1 mean from 0.251, which is not ideal but necessary if the peak is too high.

This is the last chance for parameter tuning. Let's try to get S1 peak and mean as good as possible, and then hope S2/S3 follow.
The S3 mean is good, so `k_deg_s3=0.28` with `k_conv_s2s3=0.50` might be okay if S2 input improves.

New parameter guesses for Iteration 19 (Final attempt at tuning):
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.33 (Decrease from 0.35, to lower S1 peak. Iter14 had this with S1 peak 0.490 but higher k_conv_s1s2)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.065 (Slightly decrease from 0.07 - stronger inhibition, to help cap S1 peak with low k_conv_s1s2)
*   `n_hill`: 3.1 (Slight increase from 3.0 - sharper inhibition)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.23 (Slight increase from 0.22. If S1 production is lower, a very low conversion might starve S2 too much. Trying to find a balance for S1 mean.)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.50 (Keep high to aim for S3 peak)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.28 (Keep, as S3 mean was good)

This is a careful adjustment to lower S1 peak while trying to preserve some of the S1 mean gain. The downstream parameters are kept aggressive for S2/S3 peaks.

Plan:
1.  Retrieve observed data.
2.  Re-construct SBML model with new parameters.
3.  Simulate.
4.  Compare summaries. If this is not significantly better, I will submit the best model from previous iterations.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# --- Part 1: Retrieve experimental data ---
obs_data = shared_variables.access("obs_data_0")

print("Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):")
print(obs_data.describe())

# --- Part 2: Construct the SBML model with new parameters ---
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string) # Start from the base empty model
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define species for clarity
s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# New parameter values for Iteration 19
params_iteration_19 = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.33,  # Decreased from 0.35 (Iter18)
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.065,    # Decreased from 0.07 (Iter18) - stronger inhibition
    "n_hill": 3.1,        # Increased from 3.0 (Iter18) - sharper inhibition
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.23,  # Increased from 0.22 (Iter18)
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.50,  # Kept from 0.50 (Iter18)
    "k_deg_s3": 0.28      # Kept from 0.28 (Iter18)
}

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in params_iteration_19.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the updated SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
current_sbml_model_str_it19 = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("current_model_sbml_iteration_19", current_sbml_model_str_it19)
print("\nSBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 19.")

# --- Part 3: Simulate the new SBML model ---
sim_data_it19 = simulate(current_sbml_model_str_it19)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_iteration_19", sim_data_it19)
print("\nSimulation of the Iteration 19 model completed.")

# --- Part 4: Compare simulation with experimental data (print summaries) ---
print("\nSimulated data (Iteration 19) summary:")
if sim_data_it19 is not None:
    print(sim_data_it19.describe())
    if sim_data_it19.isnull().values.any():
        print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 19) contain NaNs.")
    sim_data_values = sim_data_it19.drop('Time', axis=1)
    if sim_data_values is not None and not sim_data_values.empty:
      if (sim_data_values > 1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values < -1e6).any().any() or \
         (sim_data_values.abs() < 1e-9).all().all():
          print("\nWarning: Simulation results (Iteration 19) contain very large, very small, or potentially problematic values.")
    elif sim_data_values is None or sim_data_values.empty:
        print("\nWarning: Simulation data values are None or empty after dropping Time column.")
else:
    print("Simulation (Iteration 19) failed to produce data.")

if sim_data_it19 is not None:
    print("\nMean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 19):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it19['id_mkmu'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it19['id_3wq1'].mean():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it19['id_k51j'].mean():.3f}")

    print("\nMax values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 19):")
    print(f"id_mkmu: Obs={obs_data['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it19['id_mkmu'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_3wq1: Obs={obs_data['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it19['id_3wq1'].max():.3f}")
    print(f"id_k51j: Obs={obs_data['id_k51j'].max():.3f}, Sim={sim_data_it19['id_k51j'].max():.3f}")

# Store this model as a candidate for submission
final_sbml_candidate_19 = current_sbml_model_str_it19
shared_variables.add("final_sbml_candidate_19", final_sbml_candidate_19)

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Observed data (iteration_0) summary (reminder):
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.226346    0.182912    0.319277   12.500000
std      0.168971    0.181148    0.120585    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.096923    0.034565    0.224716    6.250000
50%      0.180249    0.115045    0.313370   12.500000
75%      0.359073    0.307315    0.420721   18.750000
max      0.561202    0.565145    0.518596   25.000000

SBML model constructed with new parameters for Iteration 19.

Simulation of the Iteration 19 model completed.

Simulated data (Iteration 19) summary:
          id_mkmu     id_3wq1     id_k51j        Time
count  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000  283.000000
mean     0.096083    0.152456    0.223469   12.500000
std      0.054926    0.073522    0.147884    7.255255
min      0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
25%      0.054260    0.109997    0.113767    6.250000
50%      0.079730    0.132830    0.182228   12.500000
75%      0.133380    0.217521    0.269841   18.750000
max      0.208715    0.268688    0.602211   25.000000

Mean values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 19):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.226, Sim=0.096
id_3wq1: Obs=0.183, Sim=0.152
id_k51j: Obs=0.319, Sim=0.223

Max values (Observed vs Simulated Iteration 19):
id_mkmu: Obs=0.561, Sim=0.209
id_3wq1: Obs=0.565, Sim=0.269
id_k51j: Obs=0.519, Sim=0.602

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 1/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (obs_data_0, current_model_sbml_iteration_2, sim_data_iteration_2, current_model_sbml_iteration_3, sim_data_iteration_3, current_model_sbml_iteration_4, sim_data_iteration_4, current_model_sbml_iteration_5, sim_data_iteration_5, current_model_sbml_iteration_6, sim_data_iteration_6, current_model_sbml_iteration_7, sim_data_iteration_7, current_model_sbml_iteration_8, sim_data_iteration_8, current_model_sbml_iteration_9, sim_data_iteration_9, current_model_sbml_iteration_10, sim_data_iteration_10, current_model_sbml_iteration_11, sim_data_iteration_11, current_model_sbml_iteration_12, sim_data_iteration_12, current_model_sbml_iteration_13, sim_data_iteration_13, current_model_sbml_iteration_14, sim_data_iteration_14, current_model_sbml_iteration_15, sim_data_iteration_15, current_model_sbml_iteration_16, sim_data_iteration_16, current_model_sbml_iteration_17, sim_data_iteration_17, current_model_sbml_iteration_18, sim_data_iteration_18, current_model_sbml_iteration_19, sim_data_iteration_19, final_sbml_candidate_19)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 20
## Thoughts

Iteration 19 did not improve the model significantly. S1 peak is 0.602 (obs 0.519), which is acceptable/slightly high. S1 mean is 0.223 (obs 0.319), still low. S2 mean (0.096) and S3 mean (0.152) are low. S2 peak (0.209) and S3 peak (0.269) are very low.

Mean values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter19):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.226 vs 0.096 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.183 vs 0.152 (Low)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.319 vs 0.223 (Low)

Max values (Observed vs. Sim_Iter19):
- `id_mkmu` (S2): 0.561 vs 0.209 (Very low)
- `id_3wq1` (S3): 0.565 vs 0.269 (Very low)
- `id_k51j` (S1): 0.519 vs 0.602 (Acceptable/Slightly high)

This is the last iteration. Manual parameter tuning has proven challenging to match all aspects (mean and peak for all three species) simultaneously. The system is highly coupled and sensitive.

Let's review previous iterations to select the "best" model achieved so far, or make one final small adjustment based on the best features seen.

Iteration 14 had an excellent S1 peak (0.490) with `k_prod_s1_max=0.33, Ki_s3_s1=0.07, n_hill=3.0`. However, its means were very low (S1=0.155, S2=0.113).
Iteration 15 had a perfect S3 mean (0.183) and acceptable S1 peak (0.608). S1 mean was 0.188, S2 mean 0.130. S2/S3 peaks low.
Iteration 16 was similar to 15. S3 mean perfect, S1 peak good (0.597). S1 mean 0.175, S2 mean 0.116. S2/S3 peaks low.
Iteration 18 had the best S1 mean so far (0.251) but S1 peak was too high (0.656).

It seems getting the S1 mean up towards 0.319 while keeping its peak around 0.519 is the hardest part. When S1 mean is low, S2 and S3 cannot reach their observed levels.

Let's consider the parameters from Iteration 18 that gave the best S1 mean:
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.35
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.07
*   `n_hill`: 3.0
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.22
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.50
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.28
Results: S1 mean 0.251, S1 peak 0.656. S2 mean 0.103, S2 peak 0.220. S3 mean 0.164, S3 peak 0.287.
The S1 peak (0.656) is too high.

Let's try to take Iteration 18's parameters and only adjust the S1 production/inhibition to lower the S1 peak, hoping the S1 mean doesn't drop too much.
To lower S1 peak from 0.656 to ~0.55:
-   Reduce `k_prod_s1_max` from 0.35.
-   Or strengthen inhibition (`Ki_s3_s1` decrease, or `n_hill` increase).

Let's try reducing `k_prod_s1_max` slightly and increasing `n_hill` slightly from Iter18 values.
`k_conv_s1s2 = 0.22` was key for the improved S1 mean in Iter18.

Final parameter guesses for Iteration 20 (Submission):
*   `k_prod_s1_max`: 0.32 (Decrease from Iter18's 0.35)
*   `Ki_s3_s1`: 0.065 (Decrease from Iter18's 0.07 - stronger inhibition)
*   `n_hill`: 3.3 (Increase from Iter18's 3.0 - sharper inhibition)
*   `k_conv_s1s2`: 0.22 (Keep from Iter18 - for S1 mean)
*   `k_conv_s2s3`: 0.50 (Keep from Iter18 - for S3 peak)
*   `k_deg_s3`: 0.28 (Keep from Iter18 - for S3 mean)

This is a final attempt to balance S1 peak and mean, hoping that if S1 mean is decent (~0.22-0.25) and S1 peak is controlled (~0.5-0.6), the S2 and S3 values will be the best compromise we can achieve.

## Action

### Submit
```python
import pandas as pd
import libsbml
import numpy as np

# Parameters for the final submission model (Iteration 20)
# Based on Iteration 18, with adjustments to control S1 peak while trying to maintain S1 mean.
final_params = {
    "k_prod_s1_max": 0.32,
    "Ki_s3_s1": 0.065,
    "n_hill": 3.3,
    "k_conv_s1s2": 0.22,
    "k_conv_s2s3": 0.50,
    "k_deg_s3": 0.28
}

# Construct the SBML model with these final parameters
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

s1_id = "id_k51j"
s2_id = "id_mkmu"
s3_id = "id_3wq1"

# Add parameters to the model
for p_id, p_val in final_params.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Reaction 1: -> S1 (inhibited by S3)
r_prod_s1 = model.createReaction()
r_prod_s1.setId("R_prod_S1")
r_prod_s1.setReversible(False)
r_prod_s1.setFast(False)
product_s1 = r_prod_s1.createProduct()
product_s1.setSpecies(s1_id)
product_s1.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s1.setConstant(False)
kl_prod_s1 = r_prod_s1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast_prod_s1_str = f"k_prod_s1_max / (1 + pow({s3_id} / Ki_s3_s1, n_hill))"
kl_prod_s1.setFormula(math_ast_prod_s1_str)

# Reaction 2: S1 -> S2
r_conv_s1s2 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s1s2.setId("R_conv_S1S2")
r_conv_s1s2.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s1s2.setFast(False)
reactant_s1_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createReactant()
reactant_s1_r2.setSpecies(s1_id)
reactant_s1_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s1_r2.setConstant(False)
product_s2_r2 = r_conv_s1s2.createProduct()
product_s2_r2.setSpecies(s2_id)
product_s2_r2.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s2_r2.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s1s2 = r_conv_s1s2.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s1s2.setFormula(f"k_conv_s1s2 * {s1_id}")

# Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
r_conv_s2s3 = model.createReaction()
r_conv_s2s3.setId("R_conv_S2S3")
r_conv_s2s3.setReversible(False)
r_conv_s2s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s2_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createReactant()
reactant_s2_r3.setSpecies(s2_id)
reactant_s2_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s2_r3.setConstant(False)
product_s3_r3 = r_conv_s2s3.createProduct()
product_s3_r3.setSpecies(s3_id)
product_s3_r3.setStoichiometry(1)
product_s3_r3.setConstant(False)
kl_conv_s2s3 = r_conv_s2s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_conv_s2s3.setFormula(f"k_conv_s2s3 * {s2_id}")

# Reaction 4: S3 ->
r_deg_s3 = model.createReaction()
r_deg_s3.setId("R_deg_S3")
r_deg_s3.setReversible(False)
r_deg_s3.setFast(False)
reactant_s3_r4 = r_deg_s3.createReactant()
reactant_s3_r4.setSpecies(s3_id)
reactant_s3_r4.setStoichiometry(1)
reactant_s3_r4.setConstant(False)
kl_deg_s3 = r_deg_s3.createKineticLaw()
kl_deg_s3.setFormula(f"k_deg_s3 * {s3_id}")

# Write the final SBML model to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
final_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

print("Final SBML model prepared for submission.")
# The variable 'final_sbml' will be picked up for submission.
```
