
                # Interation 0

                ## Task Info
                You are investigating a biological system where all species are observable. Your goal is to discover the missing reactions. You do not need to add new species.


                ## Incomplete SBML Model. You can assess it as input_sbml_string.

                <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<sbml xmlns="http://www.sbml.org/sbml/level2/version4" level="2" version="4">
  <model id="id_kafa">
    <listOfUnitDefinitions>
      <unitDefinition id="id_u4n5">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="litre" exponent="1" scale="-3" multiplier="1"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
      <unitDefinition id="id_68by">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="mole" exponent="1" scale="-3" multiplier="1"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
    </listOfUnitDefinitions>
    <listOfCompartments>
      <compartment id="id_qhvr" spatialDimensions="3" size="1" constant="true"/>
    </listOfCompartments>
    <listOfSpecies>
      <species id="id_fjbq" compartment="id_qhvr" initialConcentration="6.7" boundaryCondition="false" constant="false"/>
      <species id="id_4c0q" compartment="id_qhvr" initialConcentration="5.3" boundaryCondition="false" constant="false"/>
    </listOfSpecies>
  </model>
</sbml>


                ## Max iterations
                20

                Format your response according to the instructions in the system message.
                
## Thoughts
The initial SBML model defines a system with two species, `id_fjbq` and `id_4c0q`, in a single compartment `id_qhvr`. There are no reactions defined in the model. My goal is to discover the missing reactions.

First, I need to understand the baseline behavior of the system. An "observe" experiment will provide time-series data for `id_fjbq` and `id_4c0q` under default conditions. This will help me see if the concentrations change over time, suggesting some underlying reactions.

After obtaining the initial observation data, I will analyze it to form hypotheses about potential reactions. For example, if one species decreases while another increases, it might suggest a conversion reaction. If both decrease, it might suggest degradation or conversion into unobserved products (though the problem states all species are observable, so this is less likely unless new species need to be added, which is also stated as not needed).

Let's start by requesting an observation experiment.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
   "action": "observe",
   "meta_data": {}
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_0
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_0]

Total size: 1001 rows × 3 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_0] for the full data

Time   id_fjbq  id_4c0q
0  6.70e+00 5.30e+00
...
3.60e+00  2.70e+00 6.89e-07
...
7.20e+00  8.64e-01 3.88e-06
...
1.08e+01  5.60e-01 4.68e-04
...
1.44e+01  5.25e-01 9.28e-02
...
1.80e+01  4.59e+00 4.04e-01
...
2.16e+01  1.37e+00 3.02e-02
...
2.52e+01  1.18e+00 9.92e-01
...
2.88e+01  2.31e+00 7.84e-02
...
3.24e+01  1.18e+00 4.69e-01
...
3.60e+01  2.72e+00 2.07e-01
...
3.96e+01  1.36e+00 3.62e-01
...
4.32e+01  2.67e+00 3.47e-01
...
4.68e+01  1.52e+00 3.41e-01
...
5.04e+01  2.51e+00 4.28e-01
...
5.40e+01  1.65e+00 3.43e-01
...
5.76e+01  2.36e+00 4.59e-01
...
6.12e+01  1.74e+00 3.53e-01
...
6.48e+01  2.25e+00 4.65e-01
...
6.84e+01  1.81e+00 3.64e-01
...
7.20e+01  2.18e+00 4.61e-01
...
7.56e+01  1.87e+00 3.73e-01
...
7.92e+01  2.12e+00 4.54e-01
...
8.28e+01  1.90e+00 3.82e-01
...
8.64e+01  2.09e+00 4.47e-01
...
9.00e+01  1.93e+00 3.89e-01
...
9.36e+01  2.06e+00 4.41e-01
...
9.72e+01  1.95e+00 3.95e-01
...
1.01e+02  2.04e+00 4.36e-01
...
1.04e+02  1.97e+00 4.00e-01
...
1.08e+02  2.03e+00 4.32e-01
...
1.12e+02  1.98e+00 4.03e-01
...
1.15e+02  2.02e+00 4.28e-01
...
1.19e+02  1.98e+00 4.06e-01
...
1.22e+02  2.01e+00 4.26e-01
...
1.26e+02  1.99e+00 4.09e-01
...
1.30e+02  2.01e+00 4.24e-01
...
1.33e+02  1.99e+00 4.11e-01
...
1.37e+02  2.01e+00 4.22e-01
...
1.40e+02  1.99e+00 4.12e-01
...
1.44e+02  2.00e+00 4.21e-01
...
1.48e+02  2.00e+00 4.13e-01
...
1.51e+02  2.00e+00 4.20e-01
...
1.55e+02  2.00e+00 4.14e-01
...
1.58e+02  2.00e+00 4.19e-01
...
1.62e+02  2.00e+00 4.15e-01
...
1.66e+02  2.00e+00 4.18e-01
...
1.69e+02  2.00e+00 4.15e-01
...
1.73e+02  2.00e+00 4.18e-01
...
1.80e+02  2.00e+00 4.18e-01

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 20/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 1
## Thoughts

The previous analysis of the experimental data (`iteration_0`) revealed complex dynamics for species `id_fjbq` and `id_4c0q`, including oscillations and a sharp initial drop for `id_4c0q`. A simple linear model with interconversion and degradation was shown to be insufficient to explain a non-zero steady state.

I hypothesized a non-linear model (Model A) involving:
1.  Production of `id_fjbq` inhibited by `id_4c0q` (Hill kinetics): `Ø -> id_fjbq` with rate `k_prod_fjbq / (1 + (id_4c0q/K_i)^n_hill)`.
2.  Conversion of `id_fjbq` to `id_4c0q`: `id_fjbq -> id_4c0q` with rate `k_conv * id_fjbq`.
3.  Degradation of `id_fjbq`: `id_fjbq -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq`.
4.  Degradation of `id_4c0q`: `id_4c0q -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q`.

I estimated a set of parameters based on the observed steady-state values and qualitative features of the dynamics:
- `k_prod_fjbq = 1.56`
- `K_i = 0.5` (inhibition constant for `id_4c0q` on `id_fjbq` production)
- `n_hill = 4.0` (Hill coefficient)
- `k_conv = 0.42` (conversion `id_fjbq` to `id_4c0q`)
- `k_deg_fjbq = 0.1` (degradation of `id_fjbq`)
- `k_deg_4c0q = 2.0` (degradation of `id_4c0q`)

The plan is to implement this model in SBML, simulate it, and compare the simulation results against the experimental data. This will help evaluate if the model structure and initial parameter guesses are reasonable for capturing the observed biological system's behavior. The comparison will be visualized, and a Sum of Squared Errors (SSE) will be calculated as a quantitative measure of fit.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Access the experimental data
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Create SBML model for Hypothesis A
# Load the initial SBML string provided by the system
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Define compartment ID (already exists, but good to have its name)
# The compartment size is 1, so multiplying by comp_id in kinetic laws
# (if it represents volume) won't change numerical values if parameters are concentration-based.
# However, it's good practice for SBML specification if rates are amount/time.
# Let's assume the simulate function handles units appropriately or parameters are scaled.
# For simplicity in formula strings, if compartment volume is 1, we can omit it,
# but it's safer to include it.
comp_id = model.getCompartment(0).getId() # Get the first compartment ID, should be "id_qhvr"

# Parameters for Model A (guessed values)
params_values = {
    "k_prod_fjbq": 1.56,
    "K_i": 0.5,
    "n_hill": 4.0, 
    "k_conv": 0.42,
    "k_deg_fjbq": 0.1,
    "k_deg_4c0q": 2.0
}

for p_id, p_val in params_values.items():
    if model.getParameter(p_id) is None: # Add parameter if it doesn't exist
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(p_id)
        p.setValue(p_val)
        p.setConstant(True)
    else: # Update if it exists (e.g. if running this cell multiple times with changes)
        model.getParameter(p_id).setValue(p_val)


# Reaction 1: Ø -> id_fjbq (inhibited production)
# Rate: k_prod_fjbq / (1 + (id_4c0q/K_i)^n_hill)
r1 = model.createReaction()
r1.setId("R_prod_fjbq")
r1.setReversible(False)
r1.setFast(False) # Required for SBML L3

p1 = r1.createProduct()
p1.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
p1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
p1.setConstant(False) # Required for SBML L3

# Kinetic law for R1. Using compartment volume in the rate equation.
# If parameters are already in concentration units and model is in concentration units,
# V * k_conc * (...) = V * (rate_in_conc_units)
# d(Amt)/dt = V * Rate_conc. If d(Conc)/dt = Rate_conc, then this is fine.
# Assuming simulate function expects rate laws that evaluate to d(Concentration)/dt directly,
# or handles the V multiplication. Given V=1, it's numerically same.
# Let's write formulas assuming they directly give concentration change rate.
# The `simulate` function is a black box, usually they take care of this.
# If kinetic laws are defined as amount/time, they need multiplication by compartment volume.
# Let's assume the parameters are such that the formula gives concentration rate.
# The problem description for libsbml example does not use compartment_id in formula.
# Let's follow that example.
kinetic_law_r1_formula = f"k_prod_fjbq / (1 + pow(id_4c0q / K_i, n_hill))"
math_ast_r1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r1_formula)
kl1 = r1.createKineticLaw()
kl1.setMath(math_ast_r1)

# Reaction 2: id_fjbq -> id_4c0q (conversion)
# Rate: k_conv * id_fjbq
r2 = model.createReaction()
r2.setId("R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q")
r2.setReversible(False)
r2.setFast(False)

s_ref_r2_reactant = r2.createReactant()
s_ref_r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
s_ref_r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r2_reactant.setConstant(False)

s_ref_r2_product = r2.createProduct()
s_ref_r2_product.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
s_ref_r2_product.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r2_product.setConstant(False)

kinetic_law_r2_formula = f"k_conv * id_fjbq"
math_ast_r2 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r2_formula)
kl2 = r2.createKineticLaw()
kl2.setMath(math_ast_r2)

# Reaction 3: id_fjbq -> Ø (degradation of id_fjbq)
# Rate: k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq
r3 = model.createReaction()
r3.setId("R_deg_fjbq")
r3.setReversible(False)
r3.setFast(False)

s_ref_r3_reactant = r3.createReactant()
s_ref_r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
s_ref_r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r3_reactant.setConstant(False)

kinetic_law_r3_formula = f"k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq"
math_ast_r3 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r3_formula)
kl3 = r3.createKineticLaw()
kl3.setMath(math_ast_r3)

# Reaction 4: id_4c0q -> Ø (degradation of id_4c0q)
# Rate: k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q
r4 = model.createReaction()
r4.setId("R_deg_4c0q")
r4.setReversible(False)
r4.setFast(False)

s_ref_r4_reactant = r4.createReactant()
s_ref_r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
s_ref_r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r4_reactant.setConstant(False)

kinetic_law_r4_formula = f"k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q"
math_ast_r4 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r4_formula)
kl4 = r4.createKineticLaw()
kl4.setMath(math_ast_r4)

# Write the updated SBML to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
model_A_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("model_A_sbml_iter1", model_A_sbml_string) 
print("Model A SBML string created and saved to shared_variables['model_A_sbml_iter1']")
# print(model_A_sbml_string) # Uncomment to print the full SBML string if needed for debugging

# Simulate Model A
# Ensure the simulation uses the correct initial concentrations from the base model
# The `simulate` function should handle this by default using the initialConcentration attributes.
sim_data_A = simulate(model_A_sbml_string)
shared_variables.add("sim_data_A_iter1", sim_data_A)

# Plot comparison
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 7))
plt.plot(exp_data['Time'], exp_data['id_fjbq'], label='id_fjbq (Exp)', color='blue', linestyle='--')
plt.plot(exp_data['Time'], exp_data['id_4c0q'], label='id_4c0q (Exp)', color='orange', linestyle='--')

if sim_data_A is not None and not sim_data_A.empty:
    plt.plot(sim_data_A['Time'], sim_data_A['id_fjbq'], label='id_fjbq (Model A)', color='blue', alpha=0.7)
    plt.plot(sim_data_A['Time'], sim_data_A['id_4c0q'], label='id_4c0q (Model A)', color='orange', alpha=0.7)
    print("\nSimulated data (Model A) head:")
    print(sim_data_A.head())
    print("\nSimulated data (Model A) tail:")
    print(sim_data_A.tail())
    
    # Calculate Sum of Squared Errors (SSE)
    # Interpolate simulated data to match experimental time points for SSE calculation
    sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_A['Time'], sim_data_A['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_A['Time'], sim_data_A['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq = np.sum((exp_data['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
    sse_4c0q = np.sum((exp_data['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
    total_sse = sse_fjbq + sse_4c0q
    
    print(f"\nSSE for id_fjbq (Model A vs Exp): {sse_fjbq:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model A vs Exp): {sse_4c0q:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model A vs Exp): {total_sse:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model A failed or returned empty data.")

plt.xlabel('Time')
plt.ylabel('Concentration')
plt.legend()
plt.title('Comparison: Experimental Data vs. Model A Simulation (Iteration 1)')
plt.grid(True)
plt.savefig("plot_comparison_model_A_iter1.png")
print("Comparison plot saved as plot_comparison_model_A_iter1.png")

```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 Unauthorized modules matplotlib detected. Only these modules are allowed: numpy, pandas, libsbml, math, scipy, jax, sklearn, io, traceback.

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 19/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 2
## Thoughts

The previous attempt to simulate and plot the results failed because `matplotlib` is not an allowed library. I need to remove the plotting code and rely on printing the head/tail of the simulation data and the SSE values to evaluate the model.

The core logic of creating the SBML model (Model A) and simulating it should be correct. I will re-run the code without the plotting parts.

The steps are:
1.  Access experimental data.
2.  Create Model A SBML string.
3.  Define parameters.
4.  Add reactions:
    *   `R_prod_fjbq`: `Ø -> id_fjbq` (inhibited by `id_4c0q`)
    *   `R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q`: `id_fjbq -> id_4c0q`
    *   `R_deg_fjbq`: `id_fjbq -> Ø`
    *   `R_deg_4c0q`: `id_4c0q -> Ø`
5.  Simulate Model A.
6.  Calculate and print SSE.

I will save the SBML string and simulation data to `shared_variables` so I can access them in future iterations if needed.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# Access the experimental data
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Create SBML model for Hypothesis A
# Load the initial SBML string provided by the system
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Parameters for Model A (guessed values from Iteration 1)
params_values = {
    "k_prod_fjbq": 1.56,
    "K_i": 0.5,
    "n_hill": 4.0, 
    "k_conv": 0.42,
    "k_deg_fjbq": 0.1,
    "k_deg_4c0q": 2.0
}

for p_id, p_val in params_values.items():
    if model.getParameter(p_id) is None:
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(p_id)
        p.setValue(p_val)
        p.setConstant(True)
    else:
        model.getParameter(p_id).setValue(p_val)

# Reaction 1: Ø -> id_fjbq (inhibited production)
# Rate: k_prod_fjbq / (1 + (id_4c0q/K_i)^n_hill)
r1_id = "R_prod_fjbq"
if model.getReaction(r1_id) is None: # Add reaction only if it doesn't exist
    r1 = model.createReaction()
    r1.setId(r1_id)
    r1.setReversible(False)
    r1.setFast(False)

    p1 = r1.createProduct()
    p1.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
    p1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    p1.setConstant(False) 

    kinetic_law_r1_formula = "k_prod_fjbq / (1 + pow(id_4c0q / K_i, n_hill))"
    math_ast_r1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r1_formula)
    kl1 = r1.createKineticLaw()
    kl1.setMath(math_ast_r1)

# Reaction 2: id_fjbq -> id_4c0q (conversion)
# Rate: k_conv * id_fjbq
r2_id = "R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q"
if model.getReaction(r2_id) is None:
    r2 = model.createReaction()
    r2.setId(r2_id)
    r2.setReversible(False)
    r2.setFast(False)

    s_ref_r2_reactant = r2.createReactant()
    s_ref_r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
    s_ref_r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r2_reactant.setConstant(False)

    s_ref_r2_product = r2.createProduct()
    s_ref_r2_product.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
    s_ref_r2_product.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r2_product.setConstant(False)

    kinetic_law_r2_formula = "k_conv * id_fjbq"
    math_ast_r2 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r2_formula)
    kl2 = r2.createKineticLaw()
    kl2.setMath(math_ast_r2)

# Reaction 3: id_fjbq -> Ø (degradation of id_fjbq)
# Rate: k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq
r3_id = "R_deg_fjbq"
if model.getReaction(r3_id) is None:
    r3 = model.createReaction()
    r3.setId(r3_id)
    r3.setReversible(False)
    r3.setFast(False)

    s_ref_r3_reactant = r3.createReactant()
    s_ref_r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
    s_ref_r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r3_reactant.setConstant(False)

    kinetic_law_r3_formula = "k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq"
    math_ast_r3 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r3_formula)
    kl3 = r3.createKineticLaw()
    kl3.setMath(math_ast_r3)

# Reaction 4: id_4c0q -> Ø (degradation of id_4c0q)
# Rate: k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q
r4_id = "R_deg_4c0q"
if model.getReaction(r4_id) is None:
    r4 = model.createReaction()
    r4.setId(r4_id)
    r4.setReversible(False)
    r4.setFast(False)

    s_ref_r4_reactant = r4.createReactant()
    s_ref_r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
    s_ref_r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r4_reactant.setConstant(False)

    kinetic_law_r4_formula = "k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q"
    math_ast_r4 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r4_formula)
    kl4 = r4.createKineticLaw()
    kl4.setMath(math_ast_r4)

# Write the updated SBML to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
model_A_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("model_A_sbml_iter2", model_A_sbml_string) 
print("Model A SBML string created and saved to shared_variables['model_A_sbml_iter2']")

# Simulate Model A
sim_data_A = simulate(model_A_sbml_string)

if sim_data_A is not None and not sim_data_A.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_A_iter2", sim_data_A)
    print("\nSimulated data (Model A) head:")
    print(sim_data_A.head())
    print("\nSimulated data (Model A) tail:")
    print(sim_data_A.tail())
    
    # Calculate Sum of Squared Errors (SSE)
    # Interpolate simulated data to match experimental time points for SSE calculation
    # Ensure exp_data['Time'] and sim_data_A['Time'] are sorted, which they should be.
    sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_A['Time'], sim_data_A['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_A['Time'], sim_data_A['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq = np.sum((exp_data['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
    sse_4c0q = np.sum((exp_data['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
    total_sse = sse_fjbq + sse_4c0q
    
    print(f"\nSSE for id_fjbq (Model A vs Exp): {sse_fjbq:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model A vs Exp): {sse_4c0q:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model A vs Exp): {total_sse:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model A failed or returned empty data.")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Model A SBML string created and saved to shared_variables['model_A_sbml_iter2']

Simulated data (Model A) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  5.300000  0.00
1  6.101373  4.102612  0.18
2  5.556297  3.231047  0.36
3  5.060075  2.590034  0.54
4  4.608522  2.112841  0.72

Simulated data (Model A) tail:
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   2.001219  0.420256  179.28
997   2.001219  0.420256  179.46
998   2.001219  0.420256  179.64
999   2.001219  0.420256  179.82
1000  2.001219  0.420256  180.00

SSE for id_fjbq (Model A vs Exp): 4.8729e+02
SSE for id_4c0q (Model A vs Exp): 8.5171e+01
Total SSE (Model A vs Exp): 5.7246e+02

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 18/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (model_A_sbml_iter2, sim_data_A_iter2)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 3
## Thoughts
The previous simulation (Model A, Parameter Set A) matched the steady-state but failed to reproduce the oscillatory dynamics and the sharp initial drop of `id_4c0q` observed in the experimental data. The Total SSE was high at `5.7246e+02`.

To address this, I've formulated a new parameter set (Set B) aiming to induce oscillations and better capture the initial dynamics. The changes involve increasing the Hill coefficient (`n_hill`) for sharper feedback, and increasing the turnover rate of `id_4c0q` (by increasing both `k_conv` and `k_deg_4c0q`) while maintaining the same steady-state concentrations.

The model structure remains:
1.  Production of `id_fjbq`: `Ø -> id_fjbq` with rate `k_prod_fjbq / (1 + (id_4c0q/K_i)^n_hill)`.
2.  Conversion: `id_fjbq -> id_4c0q` with rate `k_conv * id_fjbq`.
3.  Degradation of `id_fjbq`: `id_fjbq -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq`.
4.  Degradation of `id_4c0q`: `id_4c0q -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q`.

Parameter Set A (previous):
- `k_prod_fjbq = 1.56`
- `K_i = 0.5`
- `n_hill = 4.0`
- `k_conv = 0.42`
- `k_deg_fjbq = 0.1`
- `k_deg_4c0q = 2.0`

Parameter Set B (new):
- `n_hill = 8.0` (was 4.0)
- `k_deg_4c0q = 4.0` (was 2.0)
- `k_conv = 0.84` (was 0.42) (maintains `k_deg_4c0q / k_conv = 2.0 / 0.42 = 4.0 / 0.84 = 4.76`)
- `k_deg_fjbq = 0.1` (unchanged)
- `K_i = 0.5` (unchanged)
- `k_prod_fjbq = 2.35` (was 1.56) (recalculated: `(k_conv + k_deg_fjbq) * id_fjbq_ss * (1 + (id_4c0q_ss/K_i)^n_hill)`
  `= (0.84 + 0.1) * 2.0 * (1 + (0.42/0.5)^8) = 0.94 * 2.0 * (1 + 0.84^8) = 1.88 * (1 + 0.2479) = 1.88 * 1.2479 = 2.346052`)

I will now simulate the model with Parameter Set B and evaluate its performance using SSE and by examining the head/tail of the simulated data against the experimental data.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# Access the experimental data
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Create SBML model, modifying parameters from the base input_sbml_string
# This ensures we start fresh with model structure if this block is re-run,
# but add reactions and parameters.
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Parameter Set B
params_values_B = {
    "k_prod_fjbq": 2.346, # Recalculated
    "K_i": 0.5,
    "n_hill": 8.0,      # Increased
    "k_conv": 0.84,     # Increased
    "k_deg_fjbq": 0.1,
    "k_deg_4c0q": 4.0   # Increased
}

for p_id, p_val in params_values_B.items():
    if model.getParameter(p_id) is None:
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(p_id)
        p.setValue(p_val)
        p.setConstant(True)
    else: # Update parameter if it already exists
        model.getParameter(p_id).setValue(p_val)

# Reaction 1: Ø -> id_fjbq (inhibited production)
r1_id = "R_prod_fjbq"
if model.getReaction(r1_id) is None:
    r1 = model.createReaction()
    r1.setId(r1_id)
    r1.setReversible(False)
    r1.setFast(False)
    p1 = r1.createProduct()
    p1.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
    p1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    p1.setConstant(False)
    kinetic_law_r1_formula = "k_prod_fjbq / (1 + pow(id_4c0q / K_i, n_hill))"
    math_ast_r1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r1_formula)
    kl1 = r1.createKineticLaw()
    kl1.setMath(math_ast_r1)
else: # If reaction exists, ensure its kinetic law is updated if formula string changed (though it hasn't here)
    # This part is tricky as libsbml doesn't easily allow changing formula strings directly.
    # For parameter value changes, modifying parameter objects is enough.
    # If formula structure changed, easier to remove and re-add reaction or use a fresh model.
    # Since formula structure is same, only parameter values matter.
    pass


# Reaction 2: id_fjbq -> id_4c0q (conversion)
r2_id = "R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q"
if model.getReaction(r2_id) is None:
    r2 = model.createReaction()
    r2.setId(r2_id)
    r2.setReversible(False)
    r2.setFast(False)
    s_ref_r2_reactant = r2.createReactant()
    s_ref_r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
    s_ref_r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r2_reactant.setConstant(False)
    s_ref_r2_product = r2.createProduct()
    s_ref_r2_product.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
    s_ref_r2_product.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r2_product.setConstant(False)
    kinetic_law_r2_formula = "k_conv * id_fjbq"
    math_ast_r2 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r2_formula)
    kl2 = r2.createKineticLaw()
    kl2.setMath(math_ast_r2)

# Reaction 3: id_fjbq -> Ø (degradation of id_fjbq)
r3_id = "R_deg_fjbq"
if model.getReaction(r3_id) is None:
    r3 = model.createReaction()
    r3.setId(r3_id)
    r3.setReversible(False)
    r3.setFast(False)
    s_ref_r3_reactant = r3.createReactant()
    s_ref_r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
    s_ref_r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r3_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kinetic_law_r3_formula = "k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq"
    math_ast_r3 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r3_formula)
    kl3 = r3.createKineticLaw()
    kl3.setMath(math_ast_r3)

# Reaction 4: id_4c0q -> Ø (degradation of id_4c0q)
r4_id = "R_deg_4c0q"
if model.getReaction(r4_id) is None:
    r4 = model.createReaction()
    r4.setId(r4_id)
    r4.setReversible(False)
    r4.setFast(False)
    s_ref_r4_reactant = r4.createReactant()
    s_ref_r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
    s_ref_r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r4_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kinetic_law_r4_formula = "k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q"
    math_ast_r4 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r4_formula)
    kl4 = r4.createKineticLaw()
    kl4.setMath(math_ast_r4)

# Write the updated SBML to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
model_B_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("model_B_sbml_iter3", model_B_sbml_string) 
print("Model with Parameter Set B SBML string created and saved to shared_variables['model_B_sbml_iter3']")

# Simulate Model with Parameter Set B
sim_data_B = simulate(model_B_sbml_string)

if sim_data_B is not None and not sim_data_B.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_B_iter3", sim_data_B)
    print("\nSimulated data (Parameter Set B) head:")
    print(sim_data_B.head())
    print("\nSimulated data (Parameter Set B) tail:")
    print(sim_data_B.tail())
    
    # Calculate Sum of Squared Errors (SSE)
    sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_B['Time'], sim_data_B['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_B['Time'], sim_data_B['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq = np.sum((exp_data['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
    sse_4c0q = np.sum((exp_data['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
    total_sse = sse_fjbq + sse_4c0q
    
    print(f"\nSSE for id_fjbq (Parameter Set B vs Exp): {sse_fjbq:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Parameter Set B vs Exp): {sse_4c0q:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Parameter Set B vs Exp): {total_sse:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model with Parameter Set B failed or returned empty data.")

# Compare with previous SSE
try:
    prev_sim_data_A = shared_variables.access('sim_data_A_iter2')
    if prev_sim_data_A is not None:
        prev_sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], prev_sim_data_A['Time'], prev_sim_data_A['id_fjbq'])
        prev_sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], prev_sim_data_A['Time'], prev_sim_data_A['id_4c0q'])
        prev_sse_fjbq = np.sum((exp_data['id_fjbq'] - prev_sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
        prev_sse_4c0q = np.sum((exp_data['id_4c0q'] - prev_sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
        prev_total_sse = prev_sse_fjbq + prev_sse_4c0q
        print(f"Previous Total SSE (Parameter Set A vs Exp): {prev_total_sse:.4e}")
except Exception as e:
    print(f"Could not access or compute previous SSE: {e}")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Model with Parameter Set B SBML string created and saved to shared_variables['model_B_sbml_iter3']

Simulated data (Parameter Set B) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  5.300000  0.00
1  5.657079  3.237460  0.18
2  4.776499  2.131142  0.36
3  4.033010  1.506201  0.54
4  3.405470  1.129049  0.72

Simulated data (Parameter Set B) tail:
       id_fjbq  id_4c0q    Time
996   1.999998     0.42  179.28
997   1.999998     0.42  179.46
998   1.999998     0.42  179.64
999   1.999998     0.42  179.82
1000  1.999998     0.42  180.00

SSE for id_fjbq (Parameter Set B vs Exp): 6.0113e+02
SSE for id_4c0q (Parameter Set B vs Exp): 6.0006e+01
Total SSE (Parameter Set B vs Exp): 6.6114e+02
Previous Total SSE (Parameter Set A vs Exp): 5.7246e+02

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 17/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (model_A_sbml_iter2, sim_data_A_iter2, model_B_sbml_iter3, sim_data_B_iter3)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 4
## Thoughts

The previous simulation with Parameter Set B (`n_hill=8`, faster `k_conv` and `k_deg_4c0q`) resulted in a higher SSE than Parameter Set A, indicating a poorer fit. The model still failed to capture the oscillatory dynamics and the sharp initial drop of `id_4c0q` to near-zero values.

I've hypothesized that even faster dynamics might be needed, particularly for `id_4c0q` to drop very low before `id_fjbq` production resumes significantly. I've formulated Parameter Set C by further increasing `k_conv` and `k_deg_4c0q` (while maintaining their ratio for the steady state of `id_4c0q/id_fjbq`), and recalculating `k_prod_fjbq` accordingly. The Hill coefficient `n_hill` remains high at 8.0.

Parameter Set C:
- `k_prod_fjbq = 4.443`
- `K_i = 0.5` (inhibition constant for `id_4c0q` on `id_fjbq` production)
- `n_hill = 8.0` (Hill coefficient)
- `k_conv = 1.68` (conversion `id_fjbq` to `id_4c0q`)
- `k_deg_fjbq = 0.1` (degradation of `id_fjbq`)
- `k_deg_4c0q = 8.0` (degradation of `id_4c0q`)

The model structure remains:
1.  Production of `id_fjbq`: `Ø -> id_fjbq` with rate `k_prod_fjbq / (1 + (id_4c0q/K_i)^n_hill)`.
2.  Conversion: `id_fjbq -> id_4c0q` with rate `k_conv * id_fjbq`.
3.  Degradation of `id_fjbq`: `id_fjbq -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq`.
4.  Degradation of `id_4c0q`: `id_4c0q -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q`.

I will simulate the model with Parameter Set C and compare the SSE and qualitative features (head/tail of simulation data) against the experimental data.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# Access the experimental data
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Create SBML model, modifying parameters from the base input_sbml_string
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Parameter Set C
params_values_C = {
    "k_prod_fjbq": 4.443,
    "K_i": 0.5,
    "n_hill": 8.0,
    "k_conv": 1.68,
    "k_deg_fjbq": 0.1,
    "k_deg_4c0q": 8.0
}

for p_id, p_val in params_values_C.items():
    if model.getParameter(p_id) is None:
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(p_id)
        p.setValue(p_val)
        p.setConstant(True)
    else: # Update parameter if it already exists
        model.getParameter(p_id).setValue(p_val)

# Ensure reactions are defined (copied from Iteration 3, as structure is the same)
# Reaction 1: Ø -> id_fjbq (inhibited production)
r1_id = "R_prod_fjbq"
if model.getReaction(r1_id) is None:
    r1 = model.createReaction()
    r1.setId(r1_id)
    r1.setReversible(False)
    r1.setFast(False)
    p1 = r1.createProduct()
    p1.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
    p1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    p1.setConstant(False)
    kinetic_law_r1_formula = "k_prod_fjbq / (1 + pow(id_4c0q / K_i, n_hill))"
    math_ast_r1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r1_formula)
    kl1 = r1.createKineticLaw()
    kl1.setMath(math_ast_r1)

# Reaction 2: id_fjbq -> id_4c0q (conversion)
r2_id = "R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q"
if model.getReaction(r2_id) is None:
    r2 = model.createReaction()
    r2.setId(r2_id)
    r2.setReversible(False)
    r2.setFast(False)
    s_ref_r2_reactant = r2.createReactant()
    s_ref_r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
    s_ref_r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r2_reactant.setConstant(False)
    s_ref_r2_product = r2.createProduct()
    s_ref_r2_product.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
    s_ref_r2_product.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r2_product.setConstant(False)
    kinetic_law_r2_formula = "k_conv * id_fjbq"
    math_ast_r2 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r2_formula)
    kl2 = r2.createKineticLaw()
    kl2.setMath(math_ast_r2)

# Reaction 3: id_fjbq -> Ø (degradation of id_fjbq)
r3_id = "R_deg_fjbq"
if model.getReaction(r3_id) is None:
    r3 = model.createReaction()
    r3.setId(r3_id)
    r3.setReversible(False)
    r3.setFast(False)
    s_ref_r3_reactant = r3.createReactant()
    s_ref_r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
    s_ref_r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r3_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kinetic_law_r3_formula = "k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq"
    math_ast_r3 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r3_formula)
    kl3 = r3.createKineticLaw()
    kl3.setMath(math_ast_r3)

# Reaction 4: id_4c0q -> Ø (degradation of id_4c0q)
r4_id = "R_deg_4c0q"
if model.getReaction(r4_id) is None:
    r4 = model.createReaction()
    r4.setId(r4_id)
    r4.setReversible(False)
    r4.setFast(False)
    s_ref_r4_reactant = r4.createReactant()
    s_ref_r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
    s_ref_r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r4_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kinetic_law_r4_formula = "k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q"
    math_ast_r4 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r4_formula)
    kl4 = r4.createKineticLaw()
    kl4.setMath(math_ast_r4)

# Write the updated SBML to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
model_C_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("model_C_sbml_iter4", model_C_sbml_string) 
print("Model with Parameter Set C SBML string created and saved to shared_variables['model_C_sbml_iter4']")

# Simulate Model with Parameter Set C
sim_data_C = simulate(model_C_sbml_string)

if sim_data_C is not None and not sim_data_C.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_C_iter4", sim_data_C)
    print("\nSimulated data (Parameter Set C) head:")
    print(sim_data_C.head())
    print("\nSimulated data (Parameter Set C) tail:")
    print(sim_data_C.tail())
    
    # Calculate Sum of Squared Errors (SSE)
    sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_C['Time'], sim_data_C['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_C['Time'], sim_data_C['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq = np.sum((exp_data['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
    sse_4c0q = np.sum((exp_data['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
    total_sse = sse_fjbq + sse_4c0q
    
    print(f"\nSSE for id_fjbq (Parameter Set C vs Exp): {sse_fjbq:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Parameter Set C vs Exp): {sse_4c0q:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Parameter Set C vs Exp): {total_sse:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model with Parameter Set C failed or returned empty data.")

# Compare with previous SSE (Set B)
try:
    prev_sim_data_B = shared_variables.access('sim_data_B_iter3') # From Iteration 3
    if prev_sim_data_B is not None:
        prev_sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], prev_sim_data_B['Time'], prev_sim_data_B['id_fjbq'])
        prev_sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], prev_sim_data_B['Time'], prev_sim_data_B['id_4c0q'])
        prev_sse_fjbq = np.sum((exp_data['id_fjbq'] - prev_sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
        prev_sse_4c0q = np.sum((exp_data['id_4c0q'] - prev_sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
        prev_total_sse_B = prev_sse_fjbq + prev_sse_4c0q
        print(f"Previous Total SSE (Parameter Set B vs Exp): {prev_total_sse_B:.4e}")
except Exception as e:
    print(f"Could not access or compute previous SSE for Set B: {e}")
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Model with Parameter Set C SBML string created and saved to shared_variables['model_C_sbml_iter4']

Simulated data (Parameter Set C) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  5.300000  0.00
1  4.863254  2.140500  0.18
2  3.530251  1.149392  0.36
3  2.571749  0.739081  0.54
4  1.998587  0.524367  0.72

Simulated data (Parameter Set C) tail:
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   2.000098  0.420021  179.28
997   2.000098  0.420021  179.46
998   2.000098  0.420021  179.64
999   2.000098  0.420021  179.82
1000  2.000098  0.420021  180.00

SSE for id_fjbq (Parameter Set C vs Exp): 6.8499e+02
SSE for id_4c0q (Parameter Set C vs Exp): 5.0913e+01
Total SSE (Parameter Set C vs Exp): 7.3591e+02
Previous Total SSE (Parameter Set B vs Exp): 6.6114e+02

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 16/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (model_A_sbml_iter2, sim_data_A_iter2, model_B_sbml_iter3, sim_data_B_iter3, model_C_sbml_iter4, sim_data_C_iter4)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 5
## Thoughts

My previous analysis revealed a fundamental contradiction when trying to fit the existing model structure (Hill inhibition of `id_fjbq` production by `id_4c0q`) to the experimental data. Specifically, the model could not explain how `id_fjbq` concentration falls to a minimum of ~0.525 while `id_4c0q` (the inhibitor) is already very low, and then recover to a steady state of ~2.0. This indicated that the production rate of `id_fjbq` must be governed by more complex factors.

I hypothesize a new model (Model D) where the production of `id_fjbq` is inhibited not only by `id_4c0q` but also by `id_fjbq` itself (product self-inhibition). The reactions are:
1.  `Ø -> id_fjbq` with rate `P_prod_fjbq / ((1 + (id_4c0q/K_i_4c0q)^n_hill_4c0q) * (1 + (id_fjbq/K_i_fjbq)^n_hill_fjbq))`
2.  `id_fjbq -> id_4c0q` with rate `k_conv * id_fjbq`
3.  `id_fjbq -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq`
4.  `id_4c0q -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q`

I derived a new parameter set (Set D1) based on matching steady-state values (`id_fjbq_ss=2.0`, `id_4c0q_ss=0.42`) and the observed minimum of `id_fjbq` (`id_fjbq_min=0.525` when `id_4c0q` is low), along with some assumed Hill coefficients and degradation rates similar to previous successful aspects:
-   `k_conv = 0.42`
-   `k_deg_fjbq = 0.1`
-   `k_deg_4c0q = 2.0`
-   For `id_4c0q` inhibition: `K_i_4c0q = 0.5`, `n_hill_4c0q = 4`
-   For `id_fjbq` self-inhibition: `K_i_fjbq = 1.46`, `n_hill_fjbq = 2`
-   Overall production rate constant: `P_prod_fjbq = 0.308`

This model structure with dual inhibition has the potential to create oscillations and explain the observed complex dynamics, including the deep undershoot of `id_fjbq`. I will now implement this model in SBML and simulate it.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# Access the experimental data
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Create SBML model (Model D)
# Start from the base input_sbml_string to ensure a clean slate for reactions and parameters
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Parameter Set D1
params_values_D1 = {
    "P_prod_fjbq": 0.308,
    "K_i_4c0q": 0.5,    # Inhibition by id_4c0q
    "n_hill_4c0q": 4.0,
    "K_i_fjbq": 1.46,   # Self-inhibition by id_fjbq
    "n_hill_fjbq": 2.0,
    "k_conv": 0.42,
    "k_deg_fjbq": 0.1,
    "k_deg_4c0q": 2.0
}

for p_id, p_val in params_values_D1.items():
    if model.getParameter(p_id) is None:
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(p_id)
        p.setValue(p_val)
        p.setConstant(True)
    else: 
        model.getParameter(p_id).setValue(p_val)

# Reaction 1: Ø -> id_fjbq (dual inhibition)
r1_id = "R_prod_fjbq_dual_inhib"
# Remove reaction if it exists from a previous different model structure
if model.getReaction(r1_id) is not None:
    model.removeReaction(r1_id)
# Also remove old production reaction if it has a different ID
if model.getReaction("R_prod_fjbq") is not None:
     model.removeReaction("R_prod_fjbq")


r1 = model.createReaction()
r1.setId(r1_id)
r1.setReversible(False)
r1.setFast(False)

p1_prod = r1.createProduct()
p1_prod.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
p1_prod.setStoichiometry(1.0)
p1_prod.setConstant(False)

kinetic_law_r1_formula = "P_prod_fjbq / ((1 + pow(id_4c0q / K_i_4c0q, n_hill_4c0q)) * (1 + pow(id_fjbq / K_i_fjbq, n_hill_fjbq)))"
math_ast_r1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r1_formula)
kl1 = r1.createKineticLaw()
kl1.setMath(math_ast_r1)

# Reaction 2: id_fjbq -> id_4c0q (conversion)
r2_id = "R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q"
if model.getReaction(r2_id) is None: # Add if not exists
    r2 = model.createReaction()
    r2.setId(r2_id)
    r2.setReversible(False)
    r2.setFast(False)
    s_ref_r2_reactant = r2.createReactant()
    s_ref_r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
    s_ref_r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r2_reactant.setConstant(False)
    s_ref_r2_product = r2.createProduct()
    s_ref_r2_product.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
    s_ref_r2_product.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r2_product.setConstant(False)
    kinetic_law_r2_formula = "k_conv * id_fjbq" # Formula is same, relies on k_conv parameter
    math_ast_r2 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r2_formula)
    kl2 = r2.createKineticLaw()
    kl2.setMath(math_ast_r2)
else: # If exists, ensure its kinetic law is correct (it should be if only params change)
    # For safety, one might re-set the math if formula string could change.
    # Here, formula "k_conv * id_fjbq" is stable.
    pass


# Reaction 3: id_fjbq -> Ø (degradation of id_fjbq)
r3_id = "R_deg_fjbq"
if model.getReaction(r3_id) is None:
    r3 = model.createReaction()
    r3.setId(r3_id)
    r3.setReversible(False)
    r3.setFast(False)
    s_ref_r3_reactant = r3.createReactant()
    s_ref_r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
    s_ref_r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r3_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kinetic_law_r3_formula = "k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq"
    math_ast_r3 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r3_formula)
    kl3 = r3.createKineticLaw()
    kl3.setMath(math_ast_r3)

# Reaction 4: id_4c0q -> Ø (degradation of id_4c0q)
r4_id = "R_deg_4c0q"
if model.getReaction(r4_id) is None:
    r4 = model.createReaction()
    r4.setId(r4_id)
    r4.setReversible(False)
    r4.setFast(False)
    s_ref_r4_reactant = r4.createReactant()
    s_ref_r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
    s_ref_r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    s_ref_r4_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kinetic_law_r4_formula = "k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q"
    math_ast_r4 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r4_formula)
    kl4 = r4.createKineticLaw()
    kl4.setMath(math_ast_r4)

# Write the updated SBML to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
model_D_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("model_D_sbml_iter5", model_D_sbml_string) 
print("Model D (Dual Inhibition) SBML string created and saved.")
# print(model_D_sbml_string) # For debugging

# Simulate Model D with Parameter Set D1
sim_data_D1 = simulate(model_D_sbml_string)

if sim_data_D1 is not None and not sim_data_D1.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_D1_iter5", sim_data_D1)
    print("\nSimulated data (Model D, Set D1) head:")
    print(sim_data_D1.head())
    print("\nSimulated data (Model D, Set D1) tail:")
    print(sim_data_D1.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_D1['Time'], sim_data_D1['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_D1['Time'], sim_data_D1['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq = np.sum((exp_data['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
    sse_4c0q = np.sum((exp_data['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
    total_sse = sse_fjbq + sse_4c0q
    
    print(f"\nSSE for id_fjbq (Model D, Set D1 vs Exp): {sse_fjbq:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model D, Set D1 vs Exp): {sse_4c0q:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model D, Set D1 vs Exp): {total_sse:.4e}")

    # Compare with best previous SSE (Model A, Set A from iter2)
    try:
        prev_sim_data_A = shared_variables.access('sim_data_A_iter2')
        if prev_sim_data_A is not None:
            prev_sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], prev_sim_data_A['Time'], prev_sim_data_A['id_fjbq'])
            prev_sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], prev_sim_data_A['Time'], prev_sim_data_A['id_4c0q'])
            prev_sse_fjbq = np.sum((exp_data['id_fjbq'] - prev_sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
            prev_sse_4c0q = np.sum((exp_data['id_4c0q'] - prev_sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
            prev_total_sse_A = prev_sse_fjbq + prev_sse_4c0q
            print(f"Reference Total SSE (Model A, Set A from iter2): {prev_total_sse_A:.4e}")
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Could not access or compute previous SSE for Model A: {e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model D with Parameter Set D1 failed or returned empty data.")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Model D (Dual Inhibition) SBML string created and saved.

Simulated data (Model D, Set D1) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  5.300000  0.00
1  6.101336  4.102611  0.18
2  5.556164  3.231041  0.36
3  5.059707  2.590015  0.54
4  4.607617  2.112788  0.72

Simulated data (Model D, Set D1) tail:
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   0.523587  0.109953  179.28
997   0.523587  0.109953  179.46
998   0.523587  0.109953  179.64
999   0.523587  0.109953  179.82
1000  0.523587  0.109953  180.00

SSE for id_fjbq (Model D, Set D1 vs Exp): 2.4082e+03
SSE for id_4c0q (Model D, Set D1 vs Exp): 1.6428e+02
Total SSE (Model D, Set D1 vs Exp): 2.5725e+03
Reference Total SSE (Model A, Set A from iter2): 5.7246e+02

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 15/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (model_A_sbml_iter2, sim_data_A_iter2, model_B_sbml_iter3, sim_data_B_iter3, model_C_sbml_iter4, sim_data_C_iter4, model_D_sbml_iter5, sim_data_D1_iter5)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 6
## Thoughts

The previous attempt with Model D (dual inhibition) using Parameter Set D1 failed to match the steady-state and resulted in a high SSE. The issue was primarily with the parameter values not being correctly derived to match the observed steady state of `id_fjbq ≈ 2.0` and `id_4c0q ≈ 0.42`.

I have re-derived a new parameter set (Set D2) for Model D, ensuring that it is consistent with the observed steady-state concentrations.
The model structure remains:
1.  Production of `id_fjbq`: `Ø -> id_fjbq` with rate `P_prod_fjbq / ((1 + (id_4c0q/K_i_4c0q)^n_hill_4c0q) * (1 + (id_fjbq/K_i_fjbq)^n_hill_fjbq))`
2.  Conversion: `id_fjbq -> id_4c0q` with rate `k_conv * id_fjbq`
3.  Degradation of `id_fjbq`: `id_fjbq -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq`
4.  Degradation of `id_4c0q`: `id_4c0q -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q`

Parameter Set D2:
-   `P_prod_fjbq = 3.116`
-   `K_i_4c0q = 0.5` (inhibition by `id_4c0q`)
-   `n_hill_4c0q = 4.0`
-   `K_i_fjbq = 2.0` (self-inhibition by `id_fjbq`, K_i is now at the steady-state level of `id_fjbq`)
-   `n_hill_fjbq = 2.0`
-   `k_conv = 0.42`
-   `k_deg_fjbq = 0.1`
-   `k_deg_4c0q = 2.0`

This parameter set is designed to achieve the correct steady state while the dual inhibition mechanism (especially the self-inhibition of `id_fjbq` production) might help capture the complex transient dynamics, including the significant drop and recovery of `id_fjbq`. The production rate of `id_fjbq` is now expected to be very low at high initial concentrations of `id_fjbq` and `id_4c0q`, and high when `id_fjbq` is low and `id_4c0q` is also low, potentially allowing for the observed recovery.

I will implement this model with Parameter Set D2 and simulate it.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# Access the experimental data
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Create SBML model (Model D with Parameter Set D2)
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Parameter Set D2
params_values_D2 = {
    "P_prod_fjbq": 3.116,
    "K_i_4c0q": 0.5,
    "n_hill_4c0q": 4.0,
    "K_i_fjbq": 2.0,
    "n_hill_fjbq": 2.0,
    "k_conv": 0.42,
    "k_deg_fjbq": 0.1,
    "k_deg_4c0q": 2.0
}

# Remove all existing parameters to avoid conflicts if IDs are reused by mistake
# or if some old parameters are no longer needed.
# This is safer when switching model structures or parameter naming conventions.
num_params = model.getNumParameters()
for i in range(num_params -1, -1, -1): # Iterate backwards for removal
    model.removeParameter(i)

for p_id, p_val in params_values_D2.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Remove all existing reactions to ensure a clean slate for the new model structure
num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
for i in range(num_reactions -1, -1, -1): # Iterate backwards for removal
    model.removeReaction(i)

# Reaction 1: Ø -> id_fjbq (dual inhibition)
r1 = model.createReaction()
r1.setId("R_prod_fjbq_dual_inhib")
r1.setReversible(False)
r1.setFast(False)

p1_prod = r1.createProduct()
p1_prod.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
p1_prod.setStoichiometry(1.0)
p1_prod.setConstant(False)

kinetic_law_r1_formula = "P_prod_fjbq / ((1 + pow(id_4c0q / K_i_4c0q, n_hill_4c0q)) * (1 + pow(id_fjbq / K_i_fjbq, n_hill_fjbq)))"
math_ast_r1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r1_formula)
kl1 = r1.createKineticLaw()
kl1.setMath(math_ast_r1)

# Reaction 2: id_fjbq -> id_4c0q (conversion)
r2 = model.createReaction()
r2.setId("R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q")
r2.setReversible(False)
r2.setFast(False)
s_ref_r2_reactant = r2.createReactant()
s_ref_r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
s_ref_r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r2_reactant.setConstant(False)
s_ref_r2_product = r2.createProduct()
s_ref_r2_product.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
s_ref_r2_product.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r2_product.setConstant(False)
kinetic_law_r2_formula = "k_conv * id_fjbq"
math_ast_r2 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r2_formula)
kl2 = r2.createKineticLaw()
kl2.setMath(math_ast_r2)

# Reaction 3: id_fjbq -> Ø (degradation of id_fjbq)
r3 = model.createReaction()
r3.setId("R_deg_fjbq")
r3.setReversible(False)
r3.setFast(False)
s_ref_r3_reactant = r3.createReactant()
s_ref_r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
s_ref_r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r3_reactant.setConstant(False)
kinetic_law_r3_formula = "k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq"
math_ast_r3 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r3_formula)
kl3 = r3.createKineticLaw()
kl3.setMath(math_ast_r3)

# Reaction 4: id_4c0q -> Ø (degradation of id_4c0q)
r4 = model.createReaction()
r4.setId("R_deg_4c0q")
r4.setReversible(False)
r4.setFast(False)
s_ref_r4_reactant = r4.createReactant()
s_ref_r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
s_ref_r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r4_reactant.setConstant(False)
kinetic_law_r4_formula = "k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q"
math_ast_r4 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r4_formula)
kl4 = r4.createKineticLaw()
kl4.setMath(math_ast_r4)

# Write the updated SBML to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
model_D2_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("model_D2_sbml_iter6", model_D2_sbml_string) 
print("Model D (Set D2) SBML string created and saved.")

# Simulate Model D with Parameter Set D2
sim_data_D2 = simulate(model_D2_sbml_string)

if sim_data_D2 is not None and not sim_data_D2.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_D2_iter6", sim_data_D2)
    print("\nSimulated data (Model D, Set D2) head:")
    print(sim_data_D2.head())
    print("\nSimulated data (Model D, Set D2) tail:")
    print(sim_data_D2.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_D2['Time'], sim_data_D2['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_D2['Time'], sim_data_D2['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq = np.sum((exp_data['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
    sse_4c0q = np.sum((exp_data['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
    total_sse = sse_fjbq + sse_4c0q
    
    print(f"\nSSE for id_fjbq (Model D, Set D2 vs Exp): {sse_fjbq:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model D, Set D2 vs Exp): {sse_4c0q:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model D, Set D2 vs Exp): {total_sse:.4e}")

    # Compare with best previous SSE (Model A, Set A from iter2)
    try:
        prev_sim_data_A = shared_variables.access('sim_data_A_iter2')
        if prev_sim_data_A is not None:
            prev_sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], prev_sim_data_A['Time'], prev_sim_data_A['id_fjbq'])
            prev_sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], prev_sim_data_A['Time'], prev_sim_data_A['id_4c0q'])
            prev_sse_fjbq = np.sum((exp_data['id_fjbq'] - prev_sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
            prev_sse_4c0q = np.sum((exp_data['id_4c0q'] - prev_sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
            prev_total_sse_A = prev_sse_fjbq + prev_sse_4c0q
            print(f"Reference Total SSE (Model A, Set A from iter2): {prev_total_sse_A:.4e}")
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Could not access or compute previous SSE for Model A: {e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model D with Parameter Set D2 failed or returned empty data.")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Model D (Set D2) SBML string created and saved.

Simulated data (Model D, Set D2) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  5.300000  0.00
1  6.101342  4.102612  0.18
2  5.556190  3.231042  0.36
3  5.059790  2.590019  0.54
4  4.607855  2.112801  0.72

Simulated data (Model D, Set D2) tail:
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   2.000082  0.420017  179.28
997   2.000082  0.420017  179.46
998   2.000082  0.420017  179.64
999   2.000082  0.420017  179.82
1000  2.000082  0.420017  180.00

SSE for id_fjbq (Model D, Set D2 vs Exp): 4.8831e+02
SSE for id_4c0q (Model D, Set D2 vs Exp): 8.5138e+01
Total SSE (Model D, Set D2 vs Exp): 5.7344e+02
Reference Total SSE (Model A, Set A from iter2): 5.7246e+02

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 14/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (model_A_sbml_iter2, sim_data_A_iter2, model_B_sbml_iter3, sim_data_B_iter3, model_C_sbml_iter4, sim_data_C_iter4, model_D_sbml_iter5, sim_data_D1_iter5, model_D2_sbml_iter6, sim_data_D2_iter6)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 7
## Thoughts

The previous simulation (Model D, Parameter Set D2) successfully matched the steady-state concentrations observed in the experimental data, and its SSE (`5.7344e+02`) was comparable to the best previous model (Model A, SSE `5.7246e+02`). However, Model D with Set D2 failed to reproduce the characteristic oscillatory behavior and the sharp initial drops in `id_fjbq` and `id_4c0q` concentrations.

The current hypothesis is that making the self-inhibition of `id_fjbq` production more switch-like (i.e., increasing its Hill coefficient, `n_hill_fjbq`) might induce the observed oscillations. The model structure (Model D) remains:
1.  Production of `id_fjbq`: `Ø -> id_fjbq` with rate `P_prod_fjbq / ((1 + (id_4c0q/K_i_4c0q)^n_hill_4c0q) * (1 + (id_fjbq/K_i_fjbq)^n_hill_fjbq))`
2.  Conversion: `id_fjbq -> id_4c0q` with rate `k_conv * id_fjbq`
3.  Degradation of `id_fjbq`: `id_fjbq -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq`
4.  Degradation of `id_4c0q`: `id_4c0q -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q`

I will now test Parameter Set D3:
-   `P_prod_fjbq = 3.116` (This value is maintained because `K_i_fjbq` is set to `id_fjbq_ss`, so the term `(1 + (id_fjbq_ss/K_i_fjbq)^n_hill_fjbq)` evaluates to 2, regardless of `n_hill_fjbq` as long as `n_hill_fjbq > 0`.)
-   `K_i_4c0q = 0.5`
-   `n_hill_4c0q = 4.0`
-   `K_i_fjbq = 2.0` (equal to `id_fjbq_ss`)
-   `n_hill_fjbq = 4.0` (increased from 2.0 in Set D2)
-   `k_conv = 0.42`
-   `k_deg_fjbq = 0.1`
-   `k_deg_4c0q = 2.0`

This increased `n_hill_fjbq` should make the feedback from `id_fjbq` on its own production stronger and more non-linear, which is a common requirement for oscillations in biological circuits. The expectation is that this change will help the model capture the transient oscillatory dynamics better, even if the SSE doesn't drastically improve (as SSE can be sensitive to phase/amplitude mismatches of oscillations).

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# Access the experimental data
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Create SBML model (Model D with Parameter Set D3)
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Parameter Set D3
params_values_D3 = {
    "P_prod_fjbq": 3.116,
    "K_i_4c0q": 0.5,
    "n_hill_4c0q": 4.0,
    "K_i_fjbq": 2.0,
    "n_hill_fjbq": 4.0,  # Changed from 2.0 to 4.0
    "k_conv": 0.42,
    "k_deg_fjbq": 0.1,
    "k_deg_4c0q": 2.0
}

# Remove all existing parameters to ensure a clean slate
num_params = model.getNumParameters()
for i in range(num_params - 1, -1, -1):
    model.removeParameter(i)

for p_id, p_val in params_values_D3.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Remove all existing reactions to ensure a clean slate for the model structure
num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
for i in range(num_reactions - 1, -1, -1):
    model.removeReaction(i)

# Reaction 1: Ø -> id_fjbq (dual inhibition)
r1 = model.createReaction()
r1.setId("R_prod_fjbq_dual_inhib")
r1.setReversible(False)
r1.setFast(False)
p1_prod = r1.createProduct()
p1_prod.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
p1_prod.setStoichiometry(1.0)
p1_prod.setConstant(False)
kinetic_law_r1_formula = "P_prod_fjbq / ((1 + pow(id_4c0q / K_i_4c0q, n_hill_4c0q)) * (1 + pow(id_fjbq / K_i_fjbq, n_hill_fjbq)))"
math_ast_r1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r1_formula)
kl1 = r1.createKineticLaw()
kl1.setMath(math_ast_r1)

# Reaction 2: id_fjbq -> id_4c0q (conversion)
r2 = model.createReaction()
r2.setId("R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q")
r2.setReversible(False)
r2.setFast(False)
s_ref_r2_reactant = r2.createReactant()
s_ref_r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
s_ref_r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r2_reactant.setConstant(False)
s_ref_r2_product = r2.createProduct()
s_ref_r2_product.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
s_ref_r2_product.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r2_product.setConstant(False)
kinetic_law_r2_formula = "k_conv * id_fjbq"
math_ast_r2 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r2_formula)
kl2 = r2.createKineticLaw()
kl2.setMath(math_ast_r2)

# Reaction 3: id_fjbq -> Ø (degradation of id_fjbq)
r3 = model.createReaction()
r3.setId("R_deg_fjbq")
r3.setReversible(False)
r3.setFast(False)
s_ref_r3_reactant = r3.createReactant()
s_ref_r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
s_ref_r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r3_reactant.setConstant(False)
kinetic_law_r3_formula = "k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq"
math_ast_r3 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r3_formula)
kl3 = r3.createKineticLaw()
kl3.setMath(math_ast_r3)

# Reaction 4: id_4c0q -> Ø (degradation of id_4c0q)
r4 = model.createReaction()
r4.setId("R_deg_4c0q")
r4.setReversible(False)
r4.setFast(False)
s_ref_r4_reactant = r4.createReactant()
s_ref_r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
s_ref_r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r4_reactant.setConstant(False)
kinetic_law_r4_formula = "k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q"
math_ast_r4 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r4_formula)
kl4 = r4.createKineticLaw()
kl4.setMath(math_ast_r4)

# Write the updated SBML to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
model_D3_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("model_D3_sbml_iter7", model_D3_sbml_string) 
print("Model D (Set D3) SBML string created and saved.")

# Simulate Model D with Parameter Set D3
sim_data_D3 = simulate(model_D3_sbml_string)

if sim_data_D3 is not None and not sim_data_D3.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_D3_iter7", sim_data_D3)
    print("\nSimulated data (Model D, Set D3) head:")
    print(sim_data_D3.head())
    print("\nSimulated data (Model D, Set D3) middle (around T=18):") # To check for oscillations
    print(sim_data_D3[sim_data_D3['Time'] > 17.5].head(10))
    print("\nSimulated data (Model D, Set D3) tail:")
    print(sim_data_D3.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_D3['Time'], sim_data_D3['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_D3['Time'], sim_data_D3['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq = np.sum((exp_data['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
    sse_4c0q = np.sum((exp_data['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
    total_sse = sse_fjbq + sse_4c0q
    
    print(f"\nSSE for id_fjbq (Model D, Set D3 vs Exp): {sse_fjbq:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model D, Set D3 vs Exp): {sse_4c0q:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model D, Set D3 vs Exp): {total_sse:.4e}")

    # Compare with previous best SSE (Model D, Set D2 from iter6)
    try:
        prev_sim_data_D2 = shared_variables.access('sim_data_D2_iter6')
        if prev_sim_data_D2 is not None:
            prev_sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], prev_sim_data_D2['Time'], prev_sim_data_D2['id_fjbq'])
            prev_sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], prev_sim_data_D2['Time'], prev_sim_data_D2['id_4c0q'])
            prev_sse_fjbq = np.sum((exp_data['id_fjbq'] - prev_sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
            prev_sse_4c0q = np.sum((exp_data['id_4c0q'] - prev_sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
            prev_total_sse_D2 = prev_sse_fjbq + prev_sse_4c0q
            print(f"Reference Total SSE (Model D, Set D2 from iter6): {prev_total_sse_D2:.4e}")
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Could not access or compute previous SSE for Model D, Set D2: {e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model D with Parameter Set D3 failed or returned empty data.")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Model D (Set D3) SBML string created and saved.

Simulated data (Model D, Set D3) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  5.300000  0.00
1  6.101336  4.102611  0.18
2  5.556166  3.231041  0.36
3  5.059716  2.590015  0.54
4  4.607649  2.112790  0.72

Simulated data (Model D, Set D3) middle (around T=18):
      id_fjbq   id_4c0q   Time
98   2.000063  0.420013  17.64
99   2.000063  0.420013  17.82
100  2.000063  0.420013  18.00
101  2.000063  0.420013  18.18
102  2.000063  0.420013  18.36
103  2.000063  0.420013  18.54
104  2.000063  0.420013  18.72
105  2.000063  0.420013  18.90
106  2.000063  0.420013  19.08
107  2.000063  0.420013  19.26

Simulated data (Model D, Set D3) tail:
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   2.000063  0.420013  179.28
997   2.000063  0.420013  179.46
998   2.000063  0.420013  179.64
999   2.000063  0.420013  179.82
1000  2.000063  0.420013  180.00

SSE for id_fjbq (Model D, Set D3 vs Exp): 4.8903e+02
SSE for id_4c0q (Model D, Set D3 vs Exp): 8.5122e+01
Total SSE (Model D, Set D3 vs Exp): 5.7415e+02
Reference Total SSE (Model D, Set D2 from iter6): 5.7344e+02

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 13/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (model_A_sbml_iter2, sim_data_A_iter2, model_B_sbml_iter3, sim_data_B_iter3, model_C_sbml_iter4, sim_data_C_iter4, model_D_sbml_iter5, sim_data_D1_iter5, model_D2_sbml_iter6, sim_data_D2_iter6, model_D3_sbml_iter7, sim_data_D3_iter7)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 8
## Thoughts
The previous iterations with Model D (dual inhibition of `id_fjbq` production by `id_4c0q` and `id_fjbq` itself) struggled to reproduce the oscillatory dynamics, although some parameter sets (like D2 and D3) matched the steady-state. The key challenge was to also match the transient features, particularly the deep undershoot of `id_fjbq` to ~0.525 while `id_4c0q` is also low.

I derived Parameter Set D5 by attempting to simultaneously satisfy conditions at the steady state (`id_fjbq_ss=2.0`, `id_4c0q_ss=0.42`) and at the observed minimum of `id_fjbq` (`id_fjbq_min=0.525`, `id_4c0q_min=0.0928`, where `d(id_fjbq)/dt = 0`). This led to:
-   `P_prod_fjbq = 3.921`
-   `K_i_4c0q = 0.5` (inhibition by `id_4c0q`)
-   `n_hill_4c0q = 4.0`
-   `K_i_fjbq = 1.8` (self-inhibition by `id_fjbq`)
-   `n_hill_fjbq = 4.0`
-   `k_conv = 0.42`
-   `k_deg_fjbq = 0.1`
-   `k_deg_4c0q = 2.0`

The model structure is:
1.  `Ø -> id_fjbq` with rate `P_prod_fjbq / ((1 + (id_4c0q/K_i_4c0q)^n_hill_4c0q) * (1 + (id_fjbq/K_i_fjbq)^n_hill_fjbq))`
2.  `id_fjbq -> id_4c0q` with rate `k_conv * id_fjbq`
3.  `id_fjbq -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq`
4.  `id_4c0q -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q`

This parameter set (D5) is specifically tuned to allow `id_fjbq` to reach its observed minimum value under conditions where its net rate of change is zero. The hope is that this more constrained parameter choice will not only improve the fit to the initial drop but also potentially trigger the subsequent oscillatory behavior seen in the experimental data. I will simulate this model and analyze the SSE and the qualitative features of the time course.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# Access the experimental data
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Create SBML model (Model D with Parameter Set D5)
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Parameter Set D5
params_values_D5 = {
    "P_prod_fjbq": 3.921,
    "K_i_4c0q": 0.5,
    "n_hill_4c0q": 4.0,
    "K_i_fjbq": 1.8,
    "n_hill_fjbq": 4.0,
    "k_conv": 0.42,
    "k_deg_fjbq": 0.1,
    "k_deg_4c0q": 2.0
}

# Remove all existing parameters to ensure a clean slate
num_params = model.getNumParameters()
for i in range(num_params - 1, -1, -1):
    model.removeParameter(i)

for p_id, p_val in params_values_D5.items():
    p = model.createParameter()
    p.setId(p_id)
    p.setValue(p_val)
    p.setConstant(True)

# Remove all existing reactions to ensure a clean slate for the model structure
num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
for i in range(num_reactions - 1, -1, -1):
    model.removeReaction(i)

# Reaction 1: Ø -> id_fjbq (dual inhibition)
r1 = model.createReaction()
r1.setId("R_prod_fjbq_dual_inhib")
r1.setReversible(False)
r1.setFast(False)
p1_prod = r1.createProduct()
p1_prod.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
p1_prod.setStoichiometry(1.0)
p1_prod.setConstant(False)
kinetic_law_r1_formula = "P_prod_fjbq / ((1 + pow(id_4c0q / K_i_4c0q, n_hill_4c0q)) * (1 + pow(id_fjbq / K_i_fjbq, n_hill_fjbq)))"
math_ast_r1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r1_formula)
kl1 = r1.createKineticLaw()
kl1.setMath(math_ast_r1)

# Reaction 2: id_fjbq -> id_4c0q (conversion)
r2 = model.createReaction()
r2.setId("R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q")
r2.setReversible(False)
r2.setFast(False)
s_ref_r2_reactant = r2.createReactant()
s_ref_r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
s_ref_r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r2_reactant.setConstant(False)
s_ref_r2_product = r2.createProduct()
s_ref_r2_product.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
s_ref_r2_product.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r2_product.setConstant(False)
kinetic_law_r2_formula = "k_conv * id_fjbq"
math_ast_r2 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r2_formula)
kl2 = r2.createKineticLaw()
kl2.setMath(math_ast_r2)

# Reaction 3: id_fjbq -> Ø (degradation of id_fjbq)
r3 = model.createReaction()
r3.setId("R_deg_fjbq")
r3.setReversible(False)
r3.setFast(False)
s_ref_r3_reactant = r3.createReactant()
s_ref_r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
s_ref_r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r3_reactant.setConstant(False)
kinetic_law_r3_formula = "k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq"
math_ast_r3 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r3_formula)
kl3 = r3.createKineticLaw()
kl3.setMath(math_ast_r3)

# Reaction 4: id_4c0q -> Ø (degradation of id_4c0q)
r4 = model.createReaction()
r4.setId("R_deg_4c0q")
r4.setReversible(False)
r4.setFast(False)
s_ref_r4_reactant = r4.createReactant()
s_ref_r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_4c0q")
s_ref_r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0)
s_ref_r4_reactant.setConstant(False)
kinetic_law_r4_formula = "k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q"
math_ast_r4 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r4_formula)
kl4 = r4.createKineticLaw()
kl4.setMath(math_ast_r4)

# Write the updated SBML to a string
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
model_D5_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)
shared_variables.add("model_D5_sbml_iter8", model_D5_sbml_string) 
print("Model D (Set D5) SBML string created and saved.")

# Simulate Model D with Parameter Set D5
sim_data_D5 = simulate(model_D5_sbml_string)

if sim_data_D5 is not None and not sim_data_D5.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_D5_iter8", sim_data_D5)
    print("\nSimulated data (Model D, Set D5) head:")
    print(sim_data_D5.head())
    
    print("\nSimulated data (Model D, Set D5) around T=14.4 (expected id_fjbq min):")
    print(sim_data_D5[(sim_data_D5['Time'] > 13) & (sim_data_D5['Time'] < 16)])
    
    print("\nSimulated data (Model D, Set D5) around T=18 (expected id_fjbq peak):")
    print(sim_data_D5[(sim_data_D5['Time'] > 17) & (sim_data_D5['Time'] < 20)])

    print("\nSimulated data (Model D, Set D5) tail:")
    print(sim_data_D5.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_D5['Time'], sim_data_D5['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data['Time'], sim_data_D5['Time'], sim_data_D5['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq = np.sum((exp_data['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
    sse_4c0q = np.sum((exp_data['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
    total_sse = sse_fjbq + sse_4c0q
    
    print(f"\nSSE for id_fjbq (Model D, Set D5 vs Exp): {sse_fjbq:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model D, Set D5 vs Exp): {sse_4c0q:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model D, Set D5 vs Exp): {total_sse:.4e}")

    # Compare with previous best SSEs
    try:
        # Model D, Set D3 (iter7)
        prev_total_sse_D3 = 5.7415e+02 # From iter7 output
        print(f"Reference Total SSE (Model D, Set D3 from iter7): {prev_total_sse_D3:.4e}")
        
        # Model A, Set A (iter2)
        prev_total_sse_A = 5.7246e+02 # From iter2 output
        print(f"Reference Total SSE (Model A, Set A from iter2): {prev_total_sse_A:.4e}")

    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error accessing previous SSE values for comparison: {e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model D with Parameter Set D5 failed or returned empty data.")

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Model D (Set D5) SBML string created and saved.

Simulated data (Model D, Set D5) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  5.300000  0.00
1  6.101336  4.102611  0.18
2  5.556165  3.231041  0.36
3  5.059713  2.590015  0.54
4  4.607641  2.112790  0.72

Simulated data (Model D, Set D5) around T=14.4 (expected id_fjbq min):
     id_fjbq  id_4c0q   Time
73  1.998808  0.41975  13.14
74  1.998808  0.41975  13.32
75  1.998808  0.41975  13.50
76  1.998808  0.41975  13.68
77  1.998808  0.41975  13.86
78  1.998808  0.41975  14.04
79  1.998808  0.41975  14.22
80  1.998808  0.41975  14.40
81  1.998808  0.41975  14.58
82  1.998808  0.41975  14.76
83  1.998808  0.41975  14.94
84  1.998808  0.41975  15.12
85  1.998808  0.41975  15.30
86  1.998808  0.41975  15.48
87  1.998808  0.41975  15.66
88  1.998809  0.41975  15.84

Simulated data (Model D, Set D5) around T=18 (expected id_fjbq peak):
      id_fjbq  id_4c0q   Time
95   1.998808  0.41975  17.10
96   1.998808  0.41975  17.28
97   1.998808  0.41975  17.46
98   1.998808  0.41975  17.64
99   1.998808  0.41975  17.82
100  1.998808  0.41975  18.00
101  1.998808  0.41975  18.18
102  1.998808  0.41975  18.36
103  1.998808  0.41975  18.54
104  1.998808  0.41975  18.72
105  1.998808  0.41975  18.90
106  1.998808  0.41975  19.08
107  1.998808  0.41975  19.26
108  1.998808  0.41975  19.44
109  1.998808  0.41975  19.62
110  1.998808  0.41975  19.80
111  1.998808  0.41975  19.98

Simulated data (Model D, Set D5) tail:
       id_fjbq  id_4c0q    Time
996   1.998808  0.41975  179.28
997   1.998808  0.41975  179.46
998   1.998808  0.41975  179.64
999   1.998808  0.41975  179.82
1000  1.998808  0.41975  180.00

SSE for id_fjbq (Model D, Set D5 vs Exp): 4.8896e+02
SSE for id_4c0q (Model D, Set D5 vs Exp): 8.5109e+01
Total SSE (Model D, Set D5 vs Exp): 5.7407e+02
Reference Total SSE (Model D, Set D3 from iter7): 5.7415e+02
Reference Total SSE (Model A, Set A from iter2): 5.7246e+02

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 12/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (model_A_sbml_iter2, sim_data_A_iter2, model_B_sbml_iter3, sim_data_B_iter3, model_C_sbml_iter4, sim_data_C_iter4, model_D_sbml_iter5, sim_data_D1_iter5, model_D2_sbml_iter6, sim_data_D2_iter6, model_D3_sbml_iter7, sim_data_D3_iter7, model_D5_sbml_iter8, sim_data_D5_iter8)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 9
## Thoughts

The previous attempts with Model D (dual inhibition) and various parameter sets (D1-D5) have consistently failed to reproduce the oscillatory behavior observed in the experimental data, even when steady-state values were matched. The simulations quickly settled to a steady state without the characteristic undershoot and overshoot. The SSE values remained high, comparable to the initial simpler Model A.

This suggests that the dual inhibition mechanism, as currently formulated, might not be sufficient or correctly parameterized to generate the observed oscillations. The system seems to require a stronger "kick" or a more pronounced delay or non-linearity to enter an oscillatory regime from the given initial conditions.

The experimental data shows `id_fjbq` dropping to ~0.525 around T=14.4, and `id_4c0q` dropping to very low values (e.g., `6.89e-07` at T=3.6, `9.28e-02` at T=14.4). The model simulations are not capturing this deep drop for `id_4c0q` nor the subsequent recovery and oscillations.

Perhaps the inhibition by `id_4c0q` on `id_fjbq` production needs to be much stronger or have a different functional form, or the self-inhibition of `id_fjbq` needs to be more sensitive or operate at a different range.

Given the persistent failure to induce oscillations with the current model structure despite parameter tuning, I will try a perturbation experiment. Changing the initial concentration of one of the species might reveal more about the system's stability and propensity to oscillate. If the system is indeed oscillatory, perturbing it from its initial state might shift the phase or amplitude of oscillations, or if it's near a Hopf bifurcation, it might push it into or out of an oscillatory regime.

I will try reducing the initial concentration of `id_4c0q`. `id_4c0q` inhibits `id_fjbq` production. If `id_4c0q` starts lower, `id_fjbq` production might start higher or be less inhibited initially. This could alter the trajectory significantly. Let's try halving the initial concentration of `id_4c0q`.

Initial concentrations: `id_fjbq = 6.7`, `id_4c0q = 5.3`.
New initial concentrations: `id_fjbq = 6.7` (unchanged), `id_4c0q = 2.65`.

This experiment will help test the robustness of the observed dynamics and provide new data that might constrain the model parameters or suggest alternative model structures.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
    "action": "change_initial_concentration", 
    "meta_data": {
        "id_4c0q": 2.65 
    }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_9
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_9]

Total size: 1001 rows × 3 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_9] for the full data

Time   id_fjbq  id_4c0q
0  6.70e+00 2.65e+00
...
3.60e+00  2.15e+00 6.30e-05
...
7.20e+00  7.74e-01 8.83e-04
...
1.08e+01  5.69e-01 1.22e-01
...
1.44e+01  4.39e+00 2.88e-01
...
1.80e+01  1.30e+00 4.02e-02
...
2.16e+01  1.44e+00 1.19e+00
...
2.52e+01  2.10e+00 7.91e-02
...
2.88e+01  1.26e+00 6.10e-01
...
3.24e+01  2.50e+00 1.74e-01
...
3.60e+01  1.39e+00 4.55e-01
...
3.96e+01  2.55e+00 2.82e-01
...
4.32e+01  1.53e+00 4.08e-01
...
4.68e+01  2.46e+00 3.59e-01
...
5.04e+01  1.64e+00 3.94e-01
...
5.40e+01  2.35e+00 4.02e-01
...
5.76e+01  1.73e+00 3.91e-01
...
6.12e+01  2.26e+00 4.21e-01
...
6.48e+01  1.80e+00 3.92e-01
...
6.84e+01  2.19e+00 4.29e-01
...
7.20e+01  1.85e+00 3.95e-01
...
7.56e+01  2.13e+00 4.32e-01
...
7.92e+01  1.89e+00 3.98e-01
...
8.28e+01  2.10e+00 4.31e-01
...
8.64e+01  1.92e+00 4.01e-01
...
9.00e+01  2.07e+00 4.30e-01
...
9.36e+01  1.94e+00 4.04e-01
...
9.72e+01  2.05e+00 4.28e-01
...
1.01e+02  1.96e+00 4.06e-01
...
1.04e+02  2.04e+00 4.26e-01
...
1.08e+02  1.97e+00 4.08e-01
...
1.12e+02  2.03e+00 4.24e-01
...
1.15e+02  1.98e+00 4.10e-01
...
1.19e+02  2.02e+00 4.23e-01
...
1.22e+02  1.98e+00 4.11e-01
...
1.26e+02  2.01e+00 4.22e-01
...
1.30e+02  1.99e+00 4.12e-01
...
1.33e+02  2.01e+00 4.21e-01
...
1.37e+02  1.99e+00 4.13e-01
...
1.40e+02  2.01e+00 4.20e-01
...
1.44e+02  1.99e+00 4.14e-01
...
1.48e+02  2.00e+00 4.19e-01
...
1.51e+02  2.00e+00 4.15e-01
...
1.55e+02  2.00e+00 4.19e-01
...
1.58e+02  2.00e+00 4.15e-01
...
1.62e+02  2.00e+00 4.18e-01
...
1.66e+02  2.00e+00 4.15e-01
...
1.69e+02  2.00e+00 4.18e-01
...
1.73e+02  2.00e+00 4.16e-01
...
1.80e+02  2.00e+00 4.16e-01

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 11/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_9)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (model_A_sbml_iter2, sim_data_A_iter2, model_B_sbml_iter3, sim_data_B_iter3, model_C_sbml_iter4, sim_data_C_iter4, model_D_sbml_iter5, sim_data_D1_iter5, model_D2_sbml_iter6, sim_data_D2_iter6, model_D3_sbml_iter7, sim_data_D3_iter7, model_D5_sbml_iter8, sim_data_D5_iter8)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 10
## Thoughts

The new experimental data from `iteration_9` (where initial `id_4c0q` was halved to 2.65, while `id_fjbq` started at 6.7) shows that the system still exhibits oscillatory behavior and reaches the same steady state (`id_fjbq ≈ 2.0`, `id_4c0q ≈ 0.42`). This is valuable information. The oscillations persist even with different initial conditions, suggesting that the oscillatory behavior is an intrinsic property of the system rather than a transient response to specific initial high values.

Comparing `iteration_9` with `iteration_0` (default initial conditions):
-   **Initial drop of `id_4c0q`**: In `iteration_9`, `id_4c0q` drops to `6.30e-05` at T=3.6. In `iteration_0`, it dropped to `6.89e-07` at T=3.6. The drop is still very significant.
-   **Initial drop of `id_fjbq`**: In `iteration_9`, `id_fjbq` drops to `0.569` at T=10.8. In `iteration_0`, `id_fjbq` dropped to `0.525` at T=14.4. The minimum value and timing are somewhat different.
-   **Oscillations**: Both datasets show oscillations. The period and amplitude might differ, which needs closer examination.

The fact that the system oscillates robustly and settles to the same steady state across different initial conditions is a strong clue. My current best model (Model D with various parameter sets, e.g., D5 from `model_D5_sbml_iter8`) failed to produce oscillations and just went to steady state. This implies the model is missing a crucial element for generating these sustained oscillations.

The Model D structure was:
1.  `Ø -> id_fjbq` (dual inhibition by `id_4c0q` and `id_fjbq`)
2.  `id_fjbq -> id_4c0q`
3.  `id_fjbq -> Ø`
4.  `id_4c0q -> Ø`

Perhaps the self-inhibition on `id_fjbq` production is not the correct mechanism, or its parameterization is still off. The key is that `id_fjbq` needs to recover *after* both `id_fjbq` and `id_4c0q` are low.

Let's re-examine the data from `iteration_0`:
-   `id_fjbq` starts high (6.7), `id_4c0q` starts high (5.3).
-   Both fall. `id_4c0q` falls very fast and very low.
-   `id_fjbq` continues to fall even when `id_4c0q` is extremely low (e.g., T=3.6, `id_4c0q` is `~10^-7`, `id_fjbq` is 2.7 and still falling). This implies that `id_fjbq`'s own degradation and conversion to `id_4c0q` are dominant, and its production is very low.
-   `id_fjbq` reaches a minimum (~0.525 at T=14.4) when `id_4c0q` has recovered slightly (~0.09).
-   Then `id_fjbq` starts to rise again. For `id_fjbq` to rise, its production must exceed its loss (degradation + conversion).

If `id_fjbq` production is `P / ((1 + (id_4c0q/K_iA)^nA) * (1 + (id_fjbq/K_iF)^nF))`, when `id_fjbq` is at its minimum (0.525) and `id_4c0q` is also low (0.09), the production term `(1 + (id_fjbq/K_iF)^nF)` might still be significantly inhibiting production if `K_iF` is small.

Let's try to simulate Model D (using parameters from Set D5, which was the last attempt for Model D) with the new initial conditions from `iteration_9`. This will tell us if Model D can at least qualitatively respond to the change in initial conditions, even if it doesn't oscillate.

Model D, Parameter Set D5:
-   `P_prod_fjbq = 3.921`
-   `K_i_4c0q = 0.5`
-   `n_hill_4c0q = 4.0`
-   `K_i_fjbq = 1.8`
-   `n_hill_fjbq = 4.0`
-   `k_conv = 0.42`
-   `k_deg_fjbq = 0.1`
-   `k_deg_4c0q = 2.0`

I will load `model_D5_sbml_iter8`, change the initial concentration of `id_4c0q` within the SBML string, and then simulate. Then I'll compare the simulation with `experiment_history['iteration_9']`.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# Access the new experimental data
exp_data_iter9 = experiment_history['iteration_9']

# Access the SBML string for Model D, Parameter Set D5
model_D5_sbml_string = shared_variables.access("model_D5_sbml_iter8")

if model_D5_sbml_string is None:
    print("Error: SBML string for Model D5 not found in shared_variables.")
else:
    # Modify the initial concentration of id_4c0q in the SBML string
    sbml_doc_D5_mod = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(model_D5_sbml_string)
    model_D5_mod = sbml_doc_D5_mod.getModel()
    
    species_4c0q = model_D5_mod.getSpecies("id_4c0q")
    if species_4c0q:
        species_4c0q.setInitialConcentration(2.65) # New initial condition from experiment iteration_9
        print(f"Initial concentration of id_4c0q set to {species_4c0q.getInitialConcentration()}")
    else:
        print("Error: Species id_4c0q not found in the model.")

    # Species id_fjbq should retain its original initial concentration from the base model
    # which was used to generate model_D5_sbml_iter8.
    # The base input_sbml_string has id_fjbq initialConcentration="6.7".
    # This should be preserved unless explicitly changed when model_D5_sbml_iter8 was created.
    # Let's verify.
    species_fjbq = model_D5_mod.getSpecies("id_fjbq")
    if species_fjbq:
        print(f"Initial concentration of id_fjbq is {species_fjbq.getInitialConcentration()}")
        # If it was not 6.7, we might need to set it explicitly.
        # Assuming it's correct from the original SBML.
    else:
        print("Error: Species id_fjbq not found in the model.")

    # Write the modified SBML to a new string
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    modified_model_D5_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_D5_mod)
    shared_variables.add("model_D5_mod_sbml_iter10", modified_model_D5_sbml_string)

    # Simulate the modified Model D5
    sim_data_D5_mod = simulate(modified_model_D5_sbml_string)

    if sim_data_D5_mod is not None and not sim_data_D5_mod.empty:
        shared_variables.add("sim_data_D5_mod_iter10", sim_data_D5_mod)
        print("\nSimulated data (Model D5 with modified initial id_4c0q) head:")
        print(sim_data_D5_mod.head())
        print("\nSimulated data (Model D5 with modified initial id_4c0q) tail:")
        print(sim_data_D5_mod.tail())
        
        # Calculate Sum of Squared Errors (SSE) against experiment iteration_9
        sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data_iter9['Time'], sim_data_D5_mod['Time'], sim_data_D5_mod['id_fjbq'])
        sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data_iter9['Time'], sim_data_D5_mod['Time'], sim_data_D5_mod['id_4c0q'])
        
        sse_fjbq = np.sum((exp_data_iter9['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
        sse_4c0q = np.sum((exp_data_iter9['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
        total_sse = sse_fjbq + sse_4c0q
        
        print(f"\nSSE for id_fjbq (Model D5 mod vs Exp iter9): {sse_fjbq:.4e}")
        print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model D5 mod vs Exp iter9): {sse_4c0q:.4e}")
        print(f"Total SSE (Model D5 mod vs Exp iter9): {total_sse:.4e}")

        # For context, print head of experimental data from iteration_9
        print("\nExperimental data from iteration_9 (head):")
        print(exp_data_iter9.head())
        print("\nExperimental data from iteration_9 (tail):")
        print(exp_data_iter9.tail())

    else:
        print("Simulation of modified Model D5 failed or returned empty data.")
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Initial concentration of id_4c0q set to 2.65
Initial concentration of id_fjbq is 6.7

Simulated data (Model D5 with modified initial id_4c0q) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  2.650000  0.00
1  6.101343  2.253771  0.18
2  5.556191  1.941164  0.36
3  5.059782  1.690115  0.54
4  4.607807  1.484964  0.72

Simulated data (Model D5 with modified initial id_4c0q) tail:
       id_fjbq  id_4c0q    Time
996   1.998808  0.41975  179.28
997   1.998808  0.41975  179.46
998   1.998808  0.41975  179.64
999   1.998808  0.41975  179.82
1000  1.998808  0.41975  180.00

SSE for id_fjbq (Model D5 mod vs Exp iter9): 2.6431e+02
SSE for id_4c0q (Model D5 mod vs Exp iter9): 5.7899e+01
Total SSE (Model D5 mod vs Exp iter9): 3.2221e+02

Experimental data from iteration_9 (head):
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  2.650000  0.00
1  8.300468  0.956897  0.18
2  8.426296  0.300075  0.36
3  7.990952  0.097765  0.54
4  7.424391  0.034974  0.72

Experimental data from iteration_9 (tail):
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   2.000155  0.415830  179.28
997   1.999883  0.415828  179.46
998   1.999618  0.415847  179.64
999   1.999366  0.415885  179.82
1000  1.999132  0.415942  180.00

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 10/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_9)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (model_A_sbml_iter2, sim_data_A_iter2, model_B_sbml_iter3, sim_data_B_iter3, model_C_sbml_iter4, sim_data_C_iter4, model_D_sbml_iter5, sim_data_D1_iter5, model_D2_sbml_iter6, sim_data_D2_iter6, model_D3_sbml_iter7, sim_data_D3_iter7, model_D5_sbml_iter8, sim_data_D5_iter8, model_D5_mod_sbml_iter10, sim_data_D5_mod_iter10)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 11
## Thoughts

The experimental data from `iteration_9` (halved initial `id_4c0q`) revealed a critical flaw in previous models: `id_fjbq` *increased* initially when `id_4c0q` was reduced, something Models A-D could not replicate while also matching steady-state conditions. This pointed to a more complex regulation of `id_fjbq` production, likely involving positive feedback of `id_fjbq` on its own synthesis, which is then repressed by `id_4c0q`.

I've formulated a new model (Model E) with such a mechanism:
1.  **Production of `id_fjbq`**: `Ø -> id_fjbq` with rate `(P_auto * id_fjbq^h_auto / (K_auto^h_auto + id_fjbq^h_auto)) / (1 + id_4c0q/K_iS2)`
    This term represents autocatalytic production of `id_fjbq` (Michaelis-Menten like self-activation) which is then inhibited by `id_4c0q` (simple linear inhibition, `nS2=1`).
2.  **Conversion**: `id_fjbq -> id_4c0q` with rate `k_conv * id_fjbq`
3.  **Degradation of `id_fjbq`**: `id_fjbq -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq`
4.  **Degradation of `id_4c0q`**: `id_4c0q -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q`

Based on the analysis in the previous thought block, I derived Parameter Set E1:
-   `P_auto = 8.06` (Maximal rate of the autocatalytic part, scaled by inhibition)
-   `h_auto = 2` (Hill coefficient for `id_fjbq` self-activation)
-   `K_auto = 5.0` (Activation constant for `id_fjbq` self-activation)
-   `K_iS2 = 6.0` (Inhibition constant for `id_4c0q` on `id_fjbq` production, with `nS2=1` implied by the formula)
-   `k_conv = 0.42` (Conversion of `id_fjbq` to `id_4c0q`)
-   `k_deg_fjbq = 0.1` (Degradation of `id_fjbq`)
-   `k_deg_4c0q = 2.0` (Degradation of `id_4c0q`)

This model structure with positive feedback and negative feedback is a common motif for oscillators. I will now implement this model, simulate it with both default initial conditions (to compare with `experiment_history['iteration_0']`) and the perturbed initial conditions (to compare with `experiment_history['iteration_9']`), and evaluate the SSEs.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# --- Define Model E SBML generation function ---
def create_model_E_sbml(params, base_sbml_string):
    sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(base_sbml_string)
    model = sbml_doc.getModel()

    # Remove all existing parameters
    num_params = model.getNumParameters()
    for i in range(num_params - 1, -1, -1):
        model.removeParameter(i)
    # Remove all existing reactions
    num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
    for i in range(num_reactions - 1, -1, -1):
        model.removeReaction(i)

    # Add new parameters for Model E
    for p_id, p_val in params.items():
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(p_id)
        p.setValue(p_val)
        p.setConstant(True)

    # Reaction 1: Ø -> id_fjbq (autocatalysis + inhibition)
    r1 = model.createReaction()
    r1.setId("R_prod_fjbq_E")
    r1.setReversible(False)
    r1.setFast(False)
    p1_prod = r1.createProduct()
    p1_prod.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
    p1_prod.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    p1_prod.setConstant(False)
    # Formula: (P_auto * id_fjbq^h_auto / (K_auto^h_auto + id_fjbq^h_auto)) / (1 + id_4c0q/K_iS2)
    # Note: libsbml.parseL3Formula uses pow(base, exp). K_auto^h_auto should be pow(K_auto, h_auto)
    kinetic_law_r1_formula = "(P_auto * pow(id_fjbq, h_auto) / (pow(K_auto, h_auto) + pow(id_fjbq, h_auto))) / (1 + id_4c0q/K_iS2)"
    math_ast_r1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r1_formula)
    kl1 = r1.createKineticLaw()
    kl1.setMath(math_ast_r1)
    
    # Reaction 2: id_fjbq -> id_4c0q
    r2 = model.createReaction()
    r2.setId("R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q")
    r2.setReversible(False); r2.setFast(False)
    r2_reactant = r2.createReactant(); r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r2_reactant.setConstant(False)
    r2_product = r2.createProduct(); r2_product.setSpecies("id_4c0q"); r2_product.setStoichiometry(1.0); r2_product.setConstant(False)
    kl2 = r2.createKineticLaw(); kl2.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_conv * id_fjbq"))

    # Reaction 3: id_fjbq -> Ø
    r3 = model.createReaction()
    r3.setId("R_deg_fjbq")
    r3.setReversible(False); r3.setFast(False)
    r3_reactant = r3.createReactant(); r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r3_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kl3 = r3.createKineticLaw(); kl3.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq"))

    # Reaction 4: id_4c0q -> Ø
    r4 = model.createReaction()
    r4.setId("R_deg_4c0q")
    r4.setReversible(False); r4.setFast(False)
    r4_reactant = r4.createReactant(); r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_4c0q"); r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r4_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kl4 = r4.createKineticLaw(); kl4.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q"))
    
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    return writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# --- Parameter Set E1 ---
params_E1 = {
    "P_auto": 8.06, "h_auto": 2.0, "K_auto": 5.0, "K_iS2": 6.0,
    "k_conv": 0.42, "k_deg_fjbq": 0.1, "k_deg_4c0q": 2.0
}

# --- Create Model E SBML string ---
model_E1_sbml_string = create_model_E_sbml(params_E1, input_sbml_string)
shared_variables.add("model_E1_sbml_iter11", model_E1_sbml_string)
print("Model E (Set E1) SBML string created and saved.")

# --- Simulate Model E with default initial conditions (for experiment_history['iteration_0']) ---
print("\n--- Simulation for iteration_0 data ---")
exp_data_0 = experiment_history['iteration_0']
# The create_model_E_sbml function uses input_sbml_string, which has default initial conditions.
sim_data_E1_default_ic = simulate(model_E1_sbml_string)

if sim_data_E1_default_ic is not None and not sim_data_E1_default_ic.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_E1_default_ic_iter11", sim_data_E1_default_ic)
    print("Simulated data (Model E1, default ICs) head:")
    print(sim_data_E1_default_ic.head())
    print("Simulated data (Model E1, default ICs) tail:")
    print(sim_data_E1_default_ic.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data_0['Time'], sim_data_E1_default_ic['Time'], sim_data_E1_default_ic['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data_0['Time'], sim_data_E1_default_ic['Time'], sim_data_E1_default_ic['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq_0 = np.sum((exp_data_0['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
    sse_4c0q_0 = np.sum((exp_data_0['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
    total_sse_0 = sse_fjbq_0 + sse_4c0q_0
    print(f"SSE for id_fjbq (Model E1 vs Exp iter0): {sse_fjbq_0:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model E1 vs Exp iter0): {sse_4c0q_0:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model E1 vs Exp iter0): {total_sse_0:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model E1 with default ICs failed.")

# --- Simulate Model E with perturbed initial conditions (for experiment_history['iteration_9']) ---
print("\n--- Simulation for iteration_9 data ---")
exp_data_9 = experiment_history['iteration_9']

# Create a new SBML string with modified initial conditions for id_4c0q
sbml_doc_mod_ic = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(model_E1_sbml_string)
model_mod_ic = sbml_doc_mod_ic.getModel()
species_4c0q_mod = model_mod_ic.getSpecies("id_4c0q")
if species_4c0q_mod:
    species_4c0q_mod.setInitialConcentration(2.65) # From experiment iteration_9
    # id_fjbq initial concentration remains default (6.7)
else:
    print("Error: Species id_4c0q not found in model for IC modification.")
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
model_E1_perturbed_ic_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_mod_ic)

sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic = simulate(model_E1_perturbed_ic_sbml_string)

if sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic is not None and not sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic_iter11", sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic)
    print("Simulated data (Model E1, perturbed ICs) head:")
    print(sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic.head())
    print("Simulated data (Model E1, perturbed ICs) tail:")
    print(sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp = np.interp(exp_data_9['Time'], sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic['Time'], sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp = np.interp(exp_data_9['Time'], sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic['Time'], sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq_9 = np.sum((exp_data_9['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp)**2)
    sse_4c0q_9 = np.sum((exp_data_9['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp)**2)
    total_sse_9 = sse_fjbq_9 + sse_4c0q_9
    print(f"SSE for id_fjbq (Model E1 vs Exp iter9): {sse_fjbq_9:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model E1 vs Exp iter9): {sse_4c0q_9:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model E1 vs Exp iter9): {total_sse_9:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model E1 with perturbed ICs failed.")

print("\nFor reference, experimental data from iteration_9 (head):")
print(exp_data_9.head())
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Model E (Set E1) SBML string created and saved.

--- Simulation for iteration_0 data ---
Simulated data (Model E1, default ICs) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  5.300000  0.00
1  6.599176  4.119335  0.18
2  6.553881  3.291139  0.36
3  6.553180  2.712003  0.54
4  6.587038  2.309130  0.72
Simulated data (Model E1, default ICs) tail:
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   9.009245  1.891942  179.28
997   9.009245  1.891942  179.46
998   9.009245  1.891942  179.64
999   9.009245  1.891942  179.82
1000  9.009245  1.891942  180.00
SSE for id_fjbq (Model E1 vs Exp iter0): 4.9472e+04
SSE for id_4c0q (Model E1 vs Exp iter0): 2.3006e+03
Total SSE (Model E1 vs Exp iter0): 5.1773e+04

--- Simulation for iteration_9 data ---
Simulated data (Model E1, perturbed ICs) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  2.650000  0.00
1  6.734227  2.275211  0.18
2  6.792929  2.016777  0.36
3  6.868998  1.840803  0.54
4  6.956754  1.723284  0.72
Simulated data (Model E1, perturbed ICs) tail:
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   9.009245  1.891942  179.28
997   9.009245  1.891942  179.46
998   9.009245  1.891942  179.64
999   9.009245  1.891942  179.82
1000  9.009245  1.891942  180.00
SSE for id_fjbq (Model E1 vs Exp iter9): 4.9160e+04
SSE for id_4c0q (Model E1 vs Exp iter9): 2.2531e+03
Total SSE (Model E1 vs Exp iter9): 5.1413e+04

For reference, experimental data from iteration_9 (head):
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  2.650000  0.00
1  8.300468  0.956897  0.18
2  8.426296  0.300075  0.36
3  7.990952  0.097765  0.54
4  7.424391  0.034974  0.72

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 9/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_9)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (model_A_sbml_iter2, sim_data_A_iter2, model_B_sbml_iter3, sim_data_B_iter3, model_C_sbml_iter4, sim_data_C_iter4, model_D_sbml_iter5, sim_data_D1_iter5, model_D2_sbml_iter6, sim_data_D2_iter6, model_D3_sbml_iter7, sim_data_D3_iter7, model_D5_sbml_iter8, sim_data_D5_iter8, model_D5_mod_sbml_iter10, sim_data_D5_mod_iter10, model_E1_sbml_iter11, sim_data_E1_default_ic_iter11, sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic_iter11)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 12
## Thoughts

The previous simulation with Model E and Parameter Set E1 failed to match the observed steady state and did not produce oscillations. The SSE values were very high.

I have re-derived a new parameter set (Set E2) for Model E, aiming to satisfy:
1.  The observed steady state (`id_fjbq_ss = 2.0`, `id_4c0q_ss = 0.42`).
2.  The initial increase of `id_fjbq` when initial `id_4c0q` is low (data from `iteration_9`).
3.  The initial decrease of `id_fjbq` with default initial conditions (data from `iteration_0`).

The model structure (Model E) remains:
1.  Production of `id_fjbq`: `Ø -> id_fjbq` with rate `(P_auto * id_fjbq^h_auto / (K_auto^h_auto + id_fjbq^h_auto)) / (1 + id_4c0q/K_iS2)`
2.  Conversion: `id_fjbq -> id_4c0q` with rate `k_conv * id_fjbq`
3.  Degradation of `id_fjbq`: `id_fjbq -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq`
4.  Degradation of `id_4c0q`: `id_4c0q -> Ø` with rate `k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q`

Parameter Set E2:
-   `P_auto = 5.287`
-   `h_auto = 2.0` (Hill coefficient for `id_fjbq` self-activation)
-   `K_auto = 4.0` (Activation constant for `id_fjbq` self-activation)
-   `K_iS2 = 25.0` (Inhibition constant for `id_4c0q` on `id_fjbq` production)
-   `k_conv = 0.42`
-   `k_deg_fjbq = 0.1`
-   `k_deg_4c0q = 2.0`

This parameter set is designed to be more consistent with the qualitative behaviors observed at the beginning of the simulations under different initial conditions, while also targeting the correct steady state. The autocatalytic positive feedback on `id_fjbq` production, combined with negative feedback via `id_4c0q`, has the potential to generate oscillations.

I will use the `create_model_E_sbml` function defined in the previous iteration to generate the SBML string with these new parameters and then simulate it under both default and perturbed initial conditions.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# --- Define Model E SBML generation function (copied from Iteration 11) ---
def create_model_E_sbml(params, base_sbml_string):
    sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(base_sbml_string)
    model = sbml_doc.getModel()

    # Remove all existing parameters
    num_params = model.getNumParameters()
    for i in range(num_params - 1, -1, -1):
        model.removeParameter(i)
    # Remove all existing reactions
    num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
    for i in range(num_reactions - 1, -1, -1):
        model.removeReaction(i)

    # Add new parameters for Model E
    for p_id, p_val in params.items():
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(p_id)
        p.setValue(p_val)
        p.setConstant(True)

    # Reaction 1: Ø -> id_fjbq (autocatalysis + inhibition)
    r1 = model.createReaction()
    r1.setId("R_prod_fjbq_E")
    r1.setReversible(False)
    r1.setFast(False)
    p1_prod = r1.createProduct()
    p1_prod.setSpecies("id_fjbq")
    p1_prod.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    p1_prod.setConstant(False)
    kinetic_law_r1_formula = "(P_auto * pow(id_fjbq, h_auto) / (pow(K_auto, h_auto) + pow(id_fjbq, h_auto))) / (1 + id_4c0q/K_iS2)"
    math_ast_r1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r1_formula)
    kl1 = r1.createKineticLaw()
    kl1.setMath(math_ast_r1)
    
    # Reaction 2: id_fjbq -> id_4c0q
    r2 = model.createReaction()
    r2.setId("R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q")
    r2.setReversible(False); r2.setFast(False)
    r2_reactant = r2.createReactant(); r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r2_reactant.setConstant(False)
    r2_product = r2.createProduct(); r2_product.setSpecies("id_4c0q"); r2_product.setStoichiometry(1.0); r2_product.setConstant(False)
    kl2 = r2.createKineticLaw(); kl2.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_conv * id_fjbq"))

    # Reaction 3: id_fjbq -> Ø
    r3 = model.createReaction()
    r3.setId("R_deg_fjbq")
    r3.setReversible(False); r3.setFast(False)
    r3_reactant = r3.createReactant(); r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r3_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kl3 = r3.createKineticLaw(); kl3.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq"))

    # Reaction 4: id_4c0q -> Ø
    r4 = model.createReaction()
    r4.setId("R_deg_4c0q")
    r4.setReversible(False); r4.setFast(False)
    r4_reactant = r4.createReactant(); r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_4c0q"); r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r4_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kl4 = r4.createKineticLaw(); kl4.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q"))
    
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    return writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# --- Parameter Set E2 ---
params_E2 = {
    "P_auto": 5.287, "h_auto": 2.0, "K_auto": 4.0, "K_iS2": 25.0,
    "k_conv": 0.42, "k_deg_fjbq": 0.1, "k_deg_4c0q": 2.0
}

# --- Create Model E SBML string with Parameter Set E2 ---
model_E2_sbml_string = create_model_E_sbml(params_E2, input_sbml_string)
shared_variables.add("model_E2_sbml_iter12", model_E2_sbml_string)
print("Model E (Set E2) SBML string created and saved.")

# --- Simulate Model E (Set E2) with default initial conditions (for experiment_history['iteration_0']) ---
print("\n--- Simulation for iteration_0 data (Model E2) ---")
exp_data_0 = experiment_history['iteration_0']
# The create_model_E_sbml function uses input_sbml_string, which has default initial conditions.
sim_data_E2_default_ic = simulate(model_E2_sbml_string)

if sim_data_E2_default_ic is not None and not sim_data_E2_default_ic.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_E2_default_ic_iter12", sim_data_E2_default_ic)
    print("Simulated data (Model E2, default ICs) head:")
    print(sim_data_E2_default_ic.head())
    print("Simulated data (Model E2, default ICs) tail:")
    print(sim_data_E2_default_ic.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp_0 = np.interp(exp_data_0['Time'], sim_data_E2_default_ic['Time'], sim_data_E2_default_ic['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp_0 = np.interp(exp_data_0['Time'], sim_data_E2_default_ic['Time'], sim_data_E2_default_ic['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq_0 = np.sum((exp_data_0['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp_0)**2)
    sse_4c0q_0 = np.sum((exp_data_0['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp_0)**2)
    total_sse_0 = sse_fjbq_0 + sse_4c0q_0
    print(f"SSE for id_fjbq (Model E2 vs Exp iter0): {sse_fjbq_0:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model E2 vs Exp iter0): {sse_4c0q_0:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model E2 vs Exp iter0): {total_sse_0:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model E2 with default ICs failed.")

# --- Simulate Model E (Set E2) with perturbed initial conditions (for experiment_history['iteration_9']) ---
print("\n--- Simulation for iteration_9 data (Model E2) ---")
exp_data_9 = experiment_history['iteration_9']

# Create a new SBML string with modified initial conditions for id_4c0q
sbml_doc_mod_ic_E2 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(model_E2_sbml_string) # Start from E2 model
model_mod_ic_E2 = sbml_doc_mod_ic_E2.getModel()
species_4c0q_mod_E2 = model_mod_ic_E2.getSpecies("id_4c0q")
if species_4c0q_mod_E2:
    species_4c0q_mod_E2.setInitialConcentration(2.65) # From experiment iteration_9
else:
    print("Error: Species id_4c0q not found in model for IC modification.")
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
model_E2_perturbed_ic_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_mod_ic_E2)

sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic = simulate(model_E2_perturbed_ic_sbml_string)

if sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic is not None and not sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic_iter12", sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic)
    print("Simulated data (Model E2, perturbed ICs) head:")
    print(sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic.head())
    print("Simulated data (Model E2, perturbed ICs) tail:")
    print(sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp_9 = np.interp(exp_data_9['Time'], sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic['Time'], sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp_9 = np.interp(exp_data_9['Time'], sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic['Time'], sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq_9 = np.sum((exp_data_9['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp_9)**2)
    sse_4c0q_9 = np.sum((exp_data_9['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp_9)**2)
    total_sse_9 = sse_fjbq_9 + sse_4c0q_9
    print(f"SSE for id_fjbq (Model E2 vs Exp iter9): {sse_fjbq_9:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model E2 vs Exp iter9): {sse_4c0q_9:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model E2 vs Exp iter9): {total_sse_9:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model E2 with perturbed ICs failed.")

# Print some mid-range values to check for oscillations
if sim_data_E2_default_ic is not None and not sim_data_E2_default_ic.empty:
    print("\nSimulated data (Model E2, default ICs) mid-range (around T=10-20):")
    print(sim_data_E2_default_ic[(sim_data_E2_default_ic['Time'] >= 10) & (sim_data_E2_default_ic['Time'] <= 20)])
    
if sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic is not None and not sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic.empty:
    print("\nSimulated data (Model E2, perturbed ICs) mid-range (around T=10-20):")
    print(sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic[(sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic['Time'] >= 10) & (sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic['Time'] <= 20)])

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Model E (Set E2) SBML string created and saved.

--- Simulation for iteration_0 data (Model E2) ---
Simulated data (Model E2, default ICs) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  5.300000  0.00
1  6.664923  4.121737  0.18
2  6.651266  3.298222  0.36
3  6.652894  2.723346  0.54
4  6.665149  2.322760  0.72
Simulated data (Model E2, default ICs) tail:
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   7.412923  1.556714  179.28
997   7.412923  1.556714  179.46
998   7.412923  1.556714  179.64
999   7.412923  1.556714  179.82
1000  7.412923  1.556714  180.00
SSE for id_fjbq (Model E2 vs Exp iter0): 2.9862e+04
SSE for id_4c0q (Model E2 vs Exp iter0): 1.4318e+03
Total SSE (Model E2 vs Exp iter0): 3.1294e+04

--- Simulation for iteration_9 data (Model E2) ---
Simulated data (Model E2, perturbed ICs) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  2.650000  0.00
1  6.711619  2.274557  0.18
2  6.729993  2.013611  0.36
3  6.752728  1.832872  0.54
4  6.778109  1.708310  0.72
Simulated data (Model E2, perturbed ICs) tail:
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   7.412924  1.556714  179.28
997   7.412924  1.556714  179.46
998   7.412924  1.556714  179.64
999   7.412924  1.556714  179.82
1000  7.412924  1.556714  180.00
SSE for id_fjbq (Model E2 vs Exp iter9): 2.9562e+04
SSE for id_4c0q (Model E2 vs Exp iter9): 1.3849e+03
Total SSE (Model E2 vs Exp iter9): 3.0947e+04

Simulated data (Model E2, default ICs) mid-range (around T=10-20):
      id_fjbq   id_4c0q   Time
56   7.368227  1.545541  10.08
57   7.370731  1.546166  10.26
58   7.373096  1.546757  10.44
59   7.375328  1.547314  10.62
60   7.377436  1.547841  10.80
61   7.379427  1.548338  10.98
62   7.381305  1.548808  11.16
63   7.383080  1.549251  11.34
64   7.384754  1.549669  11.52
65   7.386335  1.550064  11.70
66   7.387828  1.550437  11.88
67   7.389237  1.550790  12.06
68   7.390567  1.551122  12.24
69   7.391823  1.551436  12.42
70   7.393008  1.551732  12.60
71   7.394127  1.552012  12.78
72   7.395183  1.552276  12.96
73   7.396180  1.552525  13.14
74   7.397121  1.552761  13.32
75   7.398009  1.552983  13.50
76   7.398847  1.553192  13.68
77   7.399638  1.553390  13.86
78   7.400385  1.553577  14.04
79   7.401090  1.553753  14.22
80   7.401755  1.553920  14.40
81   7.402383  1.554077  14.58
82   7.402976  1.554225  14.76
83   7.403536  1.554365  14.94
84   7.404063  1.554497  15.12
85   7.404562  1.554622  15.30
86   7.405032  1.554739  15.48
87   7.405476  1.554851  15.66
88   7.405895  1.554955  15.84
89   7.406291  1.555054  16.02
90   7.406664  1.555148  16.20
91   7.407017  1.555236  16.38
92   7.407350  1.555319  16.56
93   7.407664  1.555398  16.74
94   7.407960  1.555472  16.92
95   7.408240  1.555542  17.10
96   7.408504  1.555608  17.28
97   7.408753  1.555670  17.46
98   7.408988  1.555729  17.64
99   7.409210  1.555785  17.82
100  7.409419  1.555837  18.00
101  7.409616  1.555886  18.18
102  7.409802  1.555933  18.36
103  7.409978  1.555977  18.54
104  7.410144  1.556018  18.72
105  7.410300  1.556057  18.90
106  7.410447  1.556094  19.08
107  7.410586  1.556129  19.26
108  7.410718  1.556162  19.44
109  7.410841  1.556193  19.62
110  7.410958  1.556222  19.80
111  7.411069  1.556250  19.98

Simulated data (Model E2, perturbed ICs) mid-range (around T=10-20):
      id_fjbq   id_4c0q   Time
56   7.377871  1.547953  10.08
57   7.379836  1.548443  10.26
58   7.381691  1.548906  10.44
59   7.383443  1.549343  10.62
60   7.385097  1.549756  10.80
61   7.386658  1.550146  10.98
62   7.388132  1.550514  11.16
63   7.389523  1.550861  11.34
64   7.390837  1.551190  11.52
65   7.392077  1.551500  11.70
66   7.393248  1.551792  11.88
67   7.394353  1.552069  12.06
68   7.395396  1.552330  12.24
69   7.396380  1.552576  12.42
70   7.397309  1.552809  12.60
71   7.398186  1.553029  12.78
72   7.399014  1.553236  12.96
73   7.399795  1.553431  13.14
74   7.400532  1.553616  13.32
75   7.401228  1.553791  13.50
76   7.401885  1.553955  13.68
77   7.402504  1.554111  13.86
78   7.403089  1.554257  14.04
79   7.403642  1.554394  14.22
80   7.404162  1.554525  14.40
81   7.404654  1.554648  14.58
82   7.405118  1.554764  14.76
83   7.405556  1.554873  14.94
84   7.405969  1.554976  15.12
85   7.406360  1.555073  15.30
86   7.406728  1.555165  15.48
87   7.407075  1.555252  15.66
88   7.407404  1.555334  15.84
89   7.407713  1.555411  16.02
90   7.408006  1.555484  16.20
91   7.408282  1.555553  16.38
92   7.408543  1.555618  16.56
93   7.408789  1.555679  16.74
94   7.409021  1.555737  16.92
95   7.409241  1.555792  17.10
96   7.409448  1.555844  17.28
97   7.409643  1.555893  17.46
98   7.409827  1.555939  17.64
99   7.410001  1.555983  17.82
100  7.410166  1.556024  18.00
101  7.410321  1.556063  18.18
102  7.410467  1.556099  18.36
103  7.410605  1.556134  18.54
104  7.410735  1.556167  18.72
105  7.410858  1.556197  18.90
106  7.410974  1.556226  19.08
107  7.411084  1.556254  19.26
108  7.411187  1.556280  19.44
109  7.411284  1.556304  19.62
110  7.411376  1.556327  19.80
111  7.411463  1.556349  19.98

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 8/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_9)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (model_A_sbml_iter2, sim_data_A_iter2, model_B_sbml_iter3, sim_data_B_iter3, model_C_sbml_iter4, sim_data_C_iter4, model_D_sbml_iter5, sim_data_D1_iter5, model_D2_sbml_iter6, sim_data_D2_iter6, model_D3_sbml_iter7, sim_data_D3_iter7, model_D5_sbml_iter8, sim_data_D5_iter8, model_D5_mod_sbml_iter10, sim_data_D5_mod_iter10, model_E1_sbml_iter11, sim_data_E1_default_ic_iter11, sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic_iter11, model_E2_sbml_iter12, sim_data_E2_default_ic_iter12, sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic_iter12)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 13
## Thoughts

The previous attempts with Model E (autocatalysis of `id_fjbq`, inhibition by `id_4c0q`) did not yield satisfactory results. Parameter Set E2 failed to match the steady state and did not oscillate. My parameter derivation process indicated that satisfying all constraints (steady state, initial slopes under two conditions) simultaneously is challenging and sensitive.

I've refined the model structure slightly to Model E', where the inhibition by `id_4c0q` also has a Hill coefficient `n_iS2`.
Production of `id_fjbq`: `(P_auto * id_fjbq^h_auto / (K_auto^h_auto + id_fjbq^h_auto)) / (1 + (id_4c0q/K_iS2)^n_iS2)`

I derived a new Parameter Set E4 for Model E' by systematically trying to meet:
1.  Target steady state: `id_fjbq_ss = 2.0`, `id_4c0q_ss = 0.42`.
2.  `d(id_fjbq)/dt < 0` for initial condition `(6.7, 5.3)` (from `iteration_0`).
3.  `d(id_fjbq)/dt > 0` for initial condition `(6.7, 2.65)` (from `iteration_9`).
This led to:
-   `P_auto = 5.537`
-   `h_auto = 2.0` (Hill coefficient for `id_fjbq` self-activation)
-   `K_auto = 4.15` (Activation constant for `id_fjbq` self-activation)
-   `K_iS2 = 10.0` (Inhibition constant for `id_4c0q`)
-   `n_iS2 = 2.0` (Hill coefficient for `id_4c0q` inhibition)
-   `k_conv = 0.42`
-   `k_deg_fjbq = 0.1`
-   `k_deg_4c0q = 2.0`

This parameter set is designed to be consistent with the observed qualitative behaviors at `t=0` and the steady state. The increased non-linearity from `n_iS2=2` and the specific tuning of `K_auto` and `K_iS2` might help in achieving the desired oscillatory dynamics. The experimental data shows damped oscillations, which this model structure could potentially replicate.

I will first define a new function `create_model_E_prime_sbml` that incorporates `n_iS2` and then test Parameter Set E4 against both experimental datasets (`iteration_0` and `iteration_9`).

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# --- Define Model E' SBML generation function ---
# (Modifies Model E to include n_iS2)
def create_model_E_prime_sbml(params, base_sbml_string):
    sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(base_sbml_string)
    model = sbml_doc.getModel()

    # Remove all existing parameters and reactions
    num_params = model.getNumParameters()
    for i in range(num_params - 1, -1, -1): model.removeParameter(i)
    num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
    for i in range(num_reactions - 1, -1, -1): model.removeReaction(i)

    # Add new parameters for Model E'
    for p_id, p_val in params.items():
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(p_id)
        p.setValue(p_val)
        p.setConstant(True)

    # Reaction 1: Ø -> id_fjbq (autocatalysis + Hill inhibition)
    r1 = model.createReaction()
    r1.setId("R_prod_fjbq_E_prime")
    r1.setReversible(False); r1.setFast(False)
    p1_prod = r1.createProduct()
    p1_prod.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); p1_prod.setStoichiometry(1.0); p1_prod.setConstant(False)
    # Formula: (P_auto * id_fjbq^h_auto / (K_auto^h_auto + id_fjbq^h_auto)) / (1 + (id_4c0q/K_iS2)^n_iS2)
    kinetic_law_r1_formula = "(P_auto * pow(id_fjbq, h_auto) / (pow(K_auto, h_auto) + pow(id_fjbq, h_auto))) / (1 + pow(id_4c0q/K_iS2, n_iS2))"
    math_ast_r1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r1_formula)
    kl1 = r1.createKineticLaw(); kl1.setMath(math_ast_r1)
    
    # Reaction 2: id_fjbq -> id_4c0q
    r2 = model.createReaction()
    r2.setId("R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q")
    r2.setReversible(False); r2.setFast(False)
    r2_reactant = r2.createReactant(); r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r2_reactant.setConstant(False)
    r2_product = r2.createProduct(); r2_product.setSpecies("id_4c0q"); r2_product.setStoichiometry(1.0); r2_product.setConstant(False)
    kl2 = r2.createKineticLaw(); kl2.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_conv * id_fjbq"))

    # Reaction 3: id_fjbq -> Ø
    r3 = model.createReaction()
    r3.setId("R_deg_fjbq")
    r3.setReversible(False); r3.setFast(False)
    r3_reactant = r3.createReactant(); r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r3_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kl3 = r3.createKineticLaw(); kl3.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq"))

    # Reaction 4: id_4c0q -> Ø
    r4 = model.createReaction()
    r4.setId("R_deg_4c0q")
    r4.setReversible(False); r4.setFast(False)
    r4_reactant = r4.createReactant(); r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_4c0q"); r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r4_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kl4 = r4.createKineticLaw(); kl4.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q"))
    
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    return writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# --- Parameter Set E4 ---
params_E4 = {
    "P_auto": 5.537, "h_auto": 2.0, "K_auto": 4.15, 
    "K_iS2": 10.0, "n_iS2": 2.0,
    "k_conv": 0.42, "k_deg_fjbq": 0.1, "k_deg_4c0q": 2.0
}

# --- Create Model E' SBML string with Parameter Set E4 ---
model_E4_sbml_string = create_model_E_prime_sbml(params_E4, input_sbml_string)
shared_variables.add("model_E4_sbml_iter13", model_E4_sbml_string)
print("Model E' (Set E4) SBML string created and saved.")

# --- Simulate Model E' (Set E4) with default initial conditions (for experiment_history['iteration_0']) ---
print("\n--- Simulation for iteration_0 data (Model E') ---")
exp_data_0 = experiment_history['iteration_0']
sim_data_E4_default_ic = simulate(model_E4_sbml_string) # Uses default ICs from input_sbml_string

if sim_data_E4_default_ic is not None and not sim_data_E4_default_ic.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_E4_default_ic_iter13", sim_data_E4_default_ic)
    print("Simulated data (Model E4, default ICs) head:")
    print(sim_data_E4_default_ic.head())
    print("Simulated data (Model E4, default ICs) tail:")
    print(sim_data_E4_default_ic.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp_0 = np.interp(exp_data_0['Time'], sim_data_E4_default_ic['Time'], sim_data_E4_default_ic['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp_0 = np.interp(exp_data_0['Time'], sim_data_E4_default_ic['Time'], sim_data_E4_default_ic['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq_0 = np.sum((exp_data_0['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp_0)**2)
    sse_4c0q_0 = np.sum((exp_data_0['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp_0)**2)
    total_sse_0 = sse_fjbq_0 + sse_4c0q_0
    print(f"SSE for id_fjbq (Model E4 vs Exp iter0): {sse_fjbq_0:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model E4 vs Exp iter0): {sse_4c0q_0:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model E4 vs Exp iter0): {total_sse_0:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model E4 with default ICs failed.")

# --- Simulate Model E' (Set E4) with perturbed initial conditions (for experiment_history['iteration_9']) ---
print("\n--- Simulation for iteration_9 data (Model E') ---")
exp_data_9 = experiment_history['iteration_9']

sbml_doc_mod_ic_E4 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(model_E4_sbml_string)
model_mod_ic_E4 = sbml_doc_mod_ic_E4.getModel()
species_4c0q_mod_E4 = model_mod_ic_E4.getSpecies("id_4c0q")
if species_4c0q_mod_E4:
    species_4c0q_mod_E4.setInitialConcentration(2.65)
else:
    print("Error: Species id_4c0q not found for IC modification.")
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
model_E4_perturbed_ic_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_mod_ic_E4)

sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic = simulate(model_E4_perturbed_ic_sbml_string)

if sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic is not None and not sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic_iter13", sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic)
    print("Simulated data (Model E4, perturbed ICs) head:")
    print(sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic.head())
    print("Simulated data (Model E4, perturbed ICs) tail:")
    print(sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp_9 = np.interp(exp_data_9['Time'], sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic['Time'], sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp_9 = np.interp(exp_data_9['Time'], sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic['Time'], sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq_9 = np.sum((exp_data_9['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp_9)**2)
    sse_4c0q_9 = np.sum((exp_data_9['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp_9)**2)
    total_sse_9 = sse_fjbq_9 + sse_4c0q_9
    print(f"SSE for id_fjbq (Model E4 vs Exp iter9): {sse_fjbq_9:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model E4 vs Exp iter9): {sse_4c0q_9:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model E4 vs Exp iter9): {total_sse_9:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model E4 with perturbed ICs failed.")

# Print some mid-range values to check for oscillations
if sim_data_E4_default_ic is not None and not sim_data_E4_default_ic.empty:
    print("\nSimulated data (Model E4, default ICs) mid-range (around T=10-30):")
    print(sim_data_E4_default_ic[(sim_data_E4_default_ic['Time'] >= 10) & (sim_data_E4_default_ic['Time'] <= 30)])
    
if sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic is not None and not sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic.empty:
    print("\nSimulated data (Model E4, perturbed ICs) mid-range (around T=10-30):")
    print(sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic[(sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic['Time'] >= 10) & (sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic['Time'] <= 30)])

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Model E' (Set E4) SBML string created and saved.

--- Simulation for iteration_0 data (Model E') ---
Simulated data (Model E4, default ICs) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  5.300000  0.00
1  6.664778  4.121576  0.18
2  6.673050  3.298758  0.36
3  6.707276  2.726165  0.54
4  6.756364  2.329408  0.72
Simulated data (Model E4, default ICs) tail:
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   8.250252  1.732553  179.28
997   8.250252  1.732553  179.46
998   8.250252  1.732553  179.64
999   8.250252  1.732553  179.82
1000  8.250252  1.732553  180.00
SSE for id_fjbq (Model E4 vs Exp iter0): 3.9518e+04
SSE for id_4c0q (Model E4 vs Exp iter0): 1.8612e+03
Total SSE (Model E4 vs Exp iter0): 4.1379e+04

--- Simulation for iteration_9 data (Model E') ---
Simulated data (Model E4, perturbed ICs) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  2.650000  0.00
1  6.751365  2.275886  0.18
2  6.810019  2.018419  0.36
3  6.872208  1.842640  0.54
4  6.935647  1.723999  0.72
Simulated data (Model E4, perturbed ICs) tail:
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   8.250255  1.732554  179.28
997   8.250255  1.732554  179.46
998   8.250254  1.732554  179.64
999   8.250254  1.732554  179.82
1000  8.250254  1.732554  180.00
SSE for id_fjbq (Model E4 vs Exp iter9): 3.9199e+04
SSE for id_4c0q (Model E4 vs Exp iter9): 1.8123e+03
Total SSE (Model E4 vs Exp iter9): 4.1011e+04

Simulated data (Model E4, default ICs) mid-range (around T=10-30):
      id_fjbq   id_4c0q   Time
56   8.178089  1.714255  10.08
57   8.182428  1.715353  10.26
58   8.186507  1.716386  10.44
59   8.190341  1.717357  10.62
60   8.193947  1.718270  10.80
..        ...       ...    ...
162  8.250143  1.732525  29.16
163  8.250150  1.732527  29.34
164  8.250156  1.732528  29.52
165  8.250161  1.732530  29.70
166  8.250167  1.732531  29.88

[111 rows x 3 columns]

Simulated data (Model E4, perturbed ICs) mid-range (around T=10-30):
      id_fjbq   id_4c0q   Time
56   8.190295  1.717345  10.08
57   8.193902  1.718258  10.26
58   8.197293  1.719117  10.44
59   8.200481  1.719924  10.62
60   8.203478  1.720684  10.80
..        ...       ...    ...
162  8.250170  1.732532  29.16
163  8.250174  1.732533  29.34
164  8.250179  1.732534  29.52
165  8.250183  1.732535  29.70
166  8.250187  1.732536  29.88

[111 rows x 3 columns]

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 7/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_9)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (model_A_sbml_iter2, sim_data_A_iter2, model_B_sbml_iter3, sim_data_B_iter3, model_C_sbml_iter4, sim_data_C_iter4, model_D_sbml_iter5, sim_data_D1_iter5, model_D2_sbml_iter6, sim_data_D2_iter6, model_D3_sbml_iter7, sim_data_D3_iter7, model_D5_sbml_iter8, sim_data_D5_iter8, model_D5_mod_sbml_iter10, sim_data_D5_mod_iter10, model_E1_sbml_iter11, sim_data_E1_default_ic_iter11, sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic_iter11, model_E2_sbml_iter12, sim_data_E2_default_ic_iter12, sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic_iter12, model_E4_sbml_iter13, sim_data_E4_default_ic_iter13, sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic_iter13)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 14
## Thoughts

The previous Model E' with Parameter Set E4 failed to achieve the target steady state (`id_fjbq=2.0, id_4c0q=0.42`) in simulations, instead settling at a different steady state (`id_fjbq ≈ 8.25, id_4c0q ≈ 1.73`). This indicated that while `(2.0, 0.42)` might have satisfied the steady-state equations for E4 analytically, it was likely an unstable point, and the system flowed to a different stable state.

I have re-derived a new parameter set (Set E5) for Model E' by:
1.  Fixing `k_conv=0.42`, `k_deg_fjbq=0.1`, `k_deg_4c0q=2.0`.
2.  Fixing Hill coefficients: `h_auto=2.0` (for `id_fjbq` self-activation) and `n_iS2=2.0` (for `id_4c0q` inhibition).
3.  Choosing `K_auto=4.0` and `K_iS2=10.0`. These values were chosen to satisfy the qualitative initial slope conditions observed in `iteration_0` (decrease in `id_fjbq`) and `iteration_9` (increase in `id_fjbq`).
4.  Calculating `P_auto` to ensure `(id_fjbq_ss=2.0, id_4c0q_ss=0.42)` is a steady state. This yielded `P_auto = 5.20917`.

The model structure (Model E') is:
Production of `id_fjbq`: `(P_auto * id_fjbq^h_auto / (K_auto^h_auto + id_fjbq^h_auto)) / (1 + (id_4c0q/K_iS2)^n_iS2)`
Other reactions (conversion and degradations) are standard mass-action.

Parameter Set E5:
-   `P_auto = 5.20917`
-   `h_auto = 2.0`
-   `K_auto = 4.0`
-   `K_iS2 = 10.0`
-   `n_iS2 = 2.0`
-   `k_conv = 0.42`
-   `k_deg_fjbq = 0.1`
-   `k_deg_4c0q = 2.0`

A quick check confirmed that for this parameter set E5, the point `(id_fjbq=8.25, id_4c0q=1.73)` is *not* a steady state, which is promising as it suggests `(2.0, 0.42)` might be the sole attractor, or at least the one the system converges to. The critical question is whether this parameter set will induce the observed damped oscillations around the `(2.0, 0.42)` steady state.

I will use the `create_model_E_prime_sbml` function (defined in Iteration 13) to generate the SBML for Model E' with Parameter Set E5 and simulate it against both experimental datasets.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# --- Define Model E' SBML generation function (copied from Iteration 13) ---
def create_model_E_prime_sbml(params, base_sbml_string):
    sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(base_sbml_string)
    model = sbml_doc.getModel()

    # Remove all existing parameters and reactions
    num_params = model.getNumParameters()
    for i in range(num_params - 1, -1, -1): model.removeParameter(i)
    num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
    for i in range(num_reactions - 1, -1, -1): model.removeReaction(i)

    # Add new parameters for Model E'
    for p_id, p_val in params.items():
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(p_id)
        p.setValue(p_val)
        p.setConstant(True)

    # Reaction 1: Ø -> id_fjbq (autocatalysis + Hill inhibition)
    r1 = model.createReaction()
    r1.setId("R_prod_fjbq_E_prime")
    r1.setReversible(False); r1.setFast(False)
    p1_prod = r1.createProduct()
    p1_prod.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); p1_prod.setStoichiometry(1.0); p1_prod.setConstant(False)
    kinetic_law_r1_formula = "(P_auto * pow(id_fjbq, h_auto) / (pow(K_auto, h_auto) + pow(id_fjbq, h_auto))) / (1 + pow(id_4c0q/K_iS2, n_iS2))"
    math_ast_r1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r1_formula)
    kl1 = r1.createKineticLaw(); kl1.setMath(math_ast_r1)
    
    r2 = model.createReaction()
    r2.setId("R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q")
    r2.setReversible(False); r2.setFast(False)
    r2_reactant = r2.createReactant(); r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r2_reactant.setConstant(False)
    r2_product = r2.createProduct(); r2_product.setSpecies("id_4c0q"); r2_product.setStoichiometry(1.0); r2_product.setConstant(False)
    kl2 = r2.createKineticLaw(); kl2.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_conv * id_fjbq"))

    r3 = model.createReaction()
    r3.setId("R_deg_fjbq")
    r3.setReversible(False); r3.setFast(False)
    r3_reactant = r3.createReactant(); r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r3_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kl3 = r3.createKineticLaw(); kl3.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq"))

    r4 = model.createReaction()
    r4.setId("R_deg_4c0q")
    r4.setReversible(False); r4.setFast(False)
    r4_reactant = r4.createReactant(); r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_4c0q"); r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r4_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kl4 = r4.createKineticLaw(); kl4.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q"))
    
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    return writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# --- Parameter Set E5 ---
params_E5 = {
    "P_auto": 5.20917, "h_auto": 2.0, "K_auto": 4.0, 
    "K_iS2": 10.0, "n_iS2": 2.0,
    "k_conv": 0.42, "k_deg_fjbq": 0.1, "k_deg_4c0q": 2.0
}

# --- Create Model E' SBML string with Parameter Set E5 ---
model_E5_sbml_string = create_model_E_prime_sbml(params_E5, input_sbml_string)
shared_variables.add("model_E5_sbml_iter14", model_E5_sbml_string)
print("Model E' (Set E5) SBML string created and saved.")

# --- Simulate Model E' (Set E5) with default initial conditions (for experiment_history['iteration_0']) ---
print("\n--- Simulation for iteration_0 data (Model E', Set E5) ---")
exp_data_0 = experiment_history['iteration_0']
sim_data_E5_default_ic = simulate(model_E5_sbml_string) 

if sim_data_E5_default_ic is not None and not sim_data_E5_default_ic.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_E5_default_ic_iter14", sim_data_E5_default_ic)
    print("Simulated data (Model E5, default ICs) head:")
    print(sim_data_E5_default_ic.head())
    print("Simulated data (Model E5, default ICs) tail:")
    print(sim_data_E5_default_ic.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp_0 = np.interp(exp_data_0['Time'], sim_data_E5_default_ic['Time'], sim_data_E5_default_ic['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp_0 = np.interp(exp_data_0['Time'], sim_data_E5_default_ic['Time'], sim_data_E5_default_ic['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq_0 = np.sum((exp_data_0['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp_0)**2)
    sse_4c0q_0 = np.sum((exp_data_0['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp_0)**2)
    total_sse_0 = sse_fjbq_0 + sse_4c0q_0
    print(f"SSE for id_fjbq (Model E5 vs Exp iter0): {sse_fjbq_0:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model E5 vs Exp iter0): {sse_4c0q_0:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model E5 vs Exp iter0): {total_sse_0:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model E5 with default ICs failed.")

# --- Simulate Model E' (Set E5) with perturbed initial conditions (for experiment_history['iteration_9']) ---
print("\n--- Simulation for iteration_9 data (Model E', Set E5) ---")
exp_data_9 = experiment_history['iteration_9']

sbml_doc_mod_ic_E5 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(model_E5_sbml_string)
model_mod_ic_E5 = sbml_doc_mod_ic_E5.getModel()
species_4c0q_mod_E5 = model_mod_ic_E5.getSpecies("id_4c0q")
if species_4c0q_mod_E5:
    species_4c0q_mod_E5.setInitialConcentration(2.65)
else:
    print("Error: Species id_4c0q not found for IC modification.")
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
model_E5_perturbed_ic_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_mod_ic_E5)

sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic = simulate(model_E5_perturbed_ic_sbml_string)

if sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic is not None and not sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic_iter14", sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic)
    print("Simulated data (Model E5, perturbed ICs) head:")
    print(sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic.head())
    print("Simulated data (Model E5, perturbed ICs) tail:")
    print(sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp_9 = np.interp(exp_data_9['Time'], sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic['Time'], sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp_9 = np.interp(exp_data_9['Time'], sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic['Time'], sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq_9 = np.sum((exp_data_9['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp_9)**2)
    sse_4c0q_9 = np.sum((exp_data_9['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp_9)**2)
    total_sse_9 = sse_fjbq_9 + sse_4c0q_9
    print(f"SSE for id_fjbq (Model E5 vs Exp iter9): {sse_fjbq_9:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model E5 vs Exp iter9): {sse_4c0q_9:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model E5 vs Exp iter9): {total_sse_9:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model E5 with perturbed ICs failed.")

# Print some mid-range values to check for oscillations
if sim_data_E5_default_ic is not None and not sim_data_E5_default_ic.empty:
    print("\nSimulated data (Model E5, default ICs) mid-range (T=10-30):")
    print(sim_data_E5_default_ic[(sim_data_E5_default_ic['Time'] >= 10) & (sim_data_E5_default_ic['Time'] <= 30)])
    
if sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic is not None and not sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic.empty:
    print("\nSimulated data (Model E5, perturbed ICs) mid-range (T=10-30):")
    print(sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic[(sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic['Time'] >= 10) & (sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic['Time'] <= 30)])
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Model E' (Set E5) SBML string created and saved.

--- Simulation for iteration_0 data (Model E', Set E5) ---
Simulated data (Model E5, default ICs) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  5.300000  0.00
1  6.641616  4.120801  0.18
2  6.626128  3.295950  0.36
3  6.636453  2.720423  0.54
4  6.661812  2.320105  0.72
Simulated data (Model E5, default ICs) tail:
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   7.680424  1.612889  179.28
997   7.680424  1.612889  179.46
998   7.680424  1.612889  179.64
999   7.680424  1.612889  179.82
1000  7.680424  1.612889  180.00
SSE for id_fjbq (Model E5 vs Exp iter0): 3.2795e+04
SSE for id_4c0q (Model E5 vs Exp iter0): 1.5619e+03
Total SSE (Model E5 vs Exp iter0): 3.4357e+04

--- Simulation for iteration_9 data (Model E', Set E5) ---
Simulated data (Model E5, perturbed ICs) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  2.650000  0.00
1  6.724430  2.274978  0.18
2  6.756671  2.015183  0.36
3  6.793098  1.836125  0.54
4  6.831517  1.713586  0.72
Simulated data (Model E5, perturbed ICs) tail:
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   7.680424  1.612889  179.28
997   7.680424  1.612889  179.46
998   7.680424  1.612889  179.64
999   7.680424  1.612889  179.82
1000  7.680424  1.612889  180.00
SSE for id_fjbq (Model E5 vs Exp iter9): 3.2492e+04
SSE for id_4c0q (Model E5 vs Exp iter9): 1.5149e+03
Total SSE (Model E5 vs Exp iter9): 3.4006e+04

Simulated data (Model E5, default ICs) mid-range (T=10-30):
      id_fjbq   id_4c0q   Time
56   7.624169  1.598765  10.08
57   7.627392  1.599573  10.26
58   7.630432  1.600335  10.44
59   7.633298  1.601054  10.62
60   7.636001  1.601732  10.80
..        ...       ...    ...
162  7.680317  1.612862  29.16
163  7.680323  1.612864  29.34
164  7.680329  1.612865  29.52
165  7.680334  1.612866  29.70
166  7.680339  1.612868  29.88

[111 rows x 3 columns]

Simulated data (Model E5, perturbed ICs) mid-range (T=10-30):
      id_fjbq   id_4c0q   Time
56   7.636566  1.601874  10.08
57   7.639082  1.602505  10.26
58   7.641454  1.603100  10.44
59   7.643691  1.603662  10.62
60   7.645800  1.604191  10.80
..        ...       ...    ...
162  7.680340  1.612868  29.16
163  7.680344  1.612869  29.34
164  7.680349  1.612870  29.52
165  7.680353  1.612871  29.70
166  7.680357  1.612872  29.88

[111 rows x 3 columns]

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 6/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_9)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (model_A_sbml_iter2, sim_data_A_iter2, model_B_sbml_iter3, sim_data_B_iter3, model_C_sbml_iter4, sim_data_C_iter4, model_D_sbml_iter5, sim_data_D1_iter5, model_D2_sbml_iter6, sim_data_D2_iter6, model_D3_sbml_iter7, sim_data_D3_iter7, model_D5_sbml_iter8, sim_data_D5_iter8, model_D5_mod_sbml_iter10, sim_data_D5_mod_iter10, model_E1_sbml_iter11, sim_data_E1_default_ic_iter11, sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic_iter11, model_E2_sbml_iter12, sim_data_E2_default_ic_iter12, sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic_iter12, model_E4_sbml_iter13, sim_data_E4_default_ic_iter13, sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic_iter13, model_E5_sbml_iter14, sim_data_E5_default_ic_iter14, sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic_iter14)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 15
## Thoughts

My previous attempts to parameterize Model E' (autocatalytic production of `id_fjbq` inhibited by `id_4c0q`) have struggled to simultaneously satisfy the steady-state, initial slope conditions for both experiments, and produce oscillations. The analytical derivation of parameters is complex and sensitive.

I've identified that Parameter Set E5 (`model_E5_sbml_iter14`) correctly captured the initial slope behaviors (decrease for default IC, increase for perturbed IC) but settled to an incorrect steady state (`id_fjbq ≈ 7.68, id_4c0q ≈ 1.61`) instead of the target (`2.0, 0.42`), and did not oscillate. This suggests that `(2.0, 0.42)` might have been an unstable point for those parameters, or the system was bistable.

The key requirements are:
1.  Correct steady state: `id_fjbq_ss = 2.0`, `id_4c0q_ss = 0.42`.
2.  Correct initial slope for `id_fjbq` in `experiment_history['iteration_0']` (decrease).
3.  Correct initial slope for `id_fjbq` in `experiment_history['iteration_9']` (increase).
4.  Damped oscillations towards the steady state.

I have derived a new Parameter Set E11 for Model E' by carefully selecting `K_auto` and `K_iS2` and their Hill coefficients (`h_auto`, `n_iS2`) to satisfy the initial slope conditions, and then calculating `P_auto` to ensure the target steady state is a solution.

Model E' structure:
1.  Production of `id_fjbq`: `(P_auto * id_fjbq^h_auto / (K_auto^h_auto + id_fjbq^h_auto)) / (1 + (id_4c0q/K_iS2)^n_iS2)`
2.  Conversion: `id_fjbq -> id_4c0q` (rate `k_conv * id_fjbq`)
3.  Degradation of `id_fjbq`: `id_fjbq -> Ø` (rate `k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq`)
4.  Degradation of `id_4c0q`: `id_4c0q -> Ø` (rate `k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q`)

Parameter Set E11:
-   `P_auto = 12.718`
-   `h_auto = 2.0` (Hill coefficient for `id_fjbq` self-activation)
-   `K_auto = 6.7` (Activation constant for `id_fjbq`. `id_fjbq_init` is at this K)
-   `n_iS2 = 4.0` (Hill coefficient for `id_4c0q` inhibition, increased for steepness)
-   `K_iS2 = 3.0` (Inhibition constant for `id_4c0q`, chosen between `S2_ic9=2.65` and `S2_ic0=5.3`)
-   `k_conv = 0.42`
-   `k_deg_fjbq = 0.1`
-   `k_deg_4c0q = 2.0`

This set is designed such that `id_fjbq_init = 6.7` is exactly at `K_auto`, meaning the self-activation term is at half-maximal stimulation when `id_fjbq` is at its initial high concentration. The inhibition by `id_4c0q` is steep due to `n_iS2=4`. The hope is that these parameters will not only satisfy the steady-state and initial slope conditions but also lead to the system entering damped oscillations around the correct steady state.

I will use the `create_model_E_prime_sbml` function (defined in Iteration 13) to generate the SBML for Model E' with Parameter Set E11 and simulate it against both experimental datasets.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# --- Define Model E' SBML generation function (copied from Iteration 13) ---
def create_model_E_prime_sbml(params, base_sbml_string):
    sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(base_sbml_string)
    model = sbml_doc.getModel()

    # Remove all existing parameters and reactions
    num_params = model.getNumParameters()
    for i in range(num_params - 1, -1, -1): model.removeParameter(i)
    num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
    for i in range(num_reactions - 1, -1, -1): model.removeReaction(i)

    for p_id, p_val in params.items():
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(p_id)
        p.setValue(p_val)
        p.setConstant(True)

    r1 = model.createReaction()
    r1.setId("R_prod_fjbq_E_prime")
    r1.setReversible(False); r1.setFast(False)
    p1_prod = r1.createProduct()
    p1_prod.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); p1_prod.setStoichiometry(1.0); p1_prod.setConstant(False)
    kinetic_law_r1_formula = "(P_auto * pow(id_fjbq, h_auto) / (pow(K_auto, h_auto) + pow(id_fjbq, h_auto))) / (1 + pow(id_4c0q/K_iS2, n_iS2))"
    math_ast_r1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r1_formula)
    kl1 = r1.createKineticLaw(); kl1.setMath(math_ast_r1)
    
    r2 = model.createReaction()
    r2.setId("R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q")
    r2.setReversible(False); r2.setFast(False)
    r2_reactant = r2.createReactant(); r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r2_reactant.setConstant(False)
    r2_product = r2.createProduct(); r2_product.setSpecies("id_4c0q"); r2_product.setStoichiometry(1.0); r2_product.setConstant(False)
    kl2 = r2.createKineticLaw(); kl2.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_conv * id_fjbq"))

    r3 = model.createReaction()
    r3.setId("R_deg_fjbq")
    r3.setReversible(False); r3.setFast(False)
    r3_reactant = r3.createReactant(); r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r3_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kl3 = r3.createKineticLaw(); kl3.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq"))

    r4 = model.createReaction()
    r4.setId("R_deg_4c0q")
    r4.setReversible(False); r4.setFast(False)
    r4_reactant = r4.createReactant(); r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_4c0q"); r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r4_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kl4 = r4.createKineticLaw(); kl4.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q"))
    
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    return writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# --- Parameter Set E11 ---
params_E11 = {
    "P_auto": 12.718, "h_auto": 2.0, "K_auto": 6.7, 
    "n_iS2": 4.0, "K_iS2": 3.0,
    "k_conv": 0.42, "k_deg_fjbq": 0.1, "k_deg_4c0q": 2.0
}

# --- Create Model E' SBML string with Parameter Set E11 ---
model_E11_sbml_string = create_model_E_prime_sbml(params_E11, input_sbml_string)
shared_variables.add("model_E11_sbml_iter15", model_E11_sbml_string)
print("Model E' (Set E11) SBML string created and saved.")

# --- Simulate Model E' (Set E11) with default initial conditions (experiment_history['iteration_0']) ---
print("\n--- Simulation for iteration_0 data (Model E', Set E11) ---")
exp_data_0 = experiment_history['iteration_0']
sim_data_E11_default_ic = simulate(model_E11_sbml_string) 

if sim_data_E11_default_ic is not None and not sim_data_E11_default_ic.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_E11_default_ic_iter15", sim_data_E11_default_ic)
    print("Simulated data (Model E11, default ICs) head:")
    print(sim_data_E11_default_ic.head())
    print("Simulated data (Model E11, default ICs) tail:")
    print(sim_data_E11_default_ic.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp_0 = np.interp(exp_data_0['Time'], sim_data_E11_default_ic['Time'], sim_data_E11_default_ic['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp_0 = np.interp(exp_data_0['Time'], sim_data_E11_default_ic['Time'], sim_data_E11_default_ic['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq_0 = np.sum((exp_data_0['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp_0)**2)
    sse_4c0q_0 = np.sum((exp_data_0['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp_0)**2)
    total_sse_0 = sse_fjbq_0 + sse_4c0q_0
    print(f"SSE for id_fjbq (Model E11 vs Exp iter0): {sse_fjbq_0:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model E11 vs Exp iter0): {sse_4c0q_0:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model E11 vs Exp iter0): {total_sse_0:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model E11 with default ICs failed.")

# --- Simulate Model E' (Set E11) with perturbed initial conditions (experiment_history['iteration_9']) ---
print("\n--- Simulation for iteration_9 data (Model E', Set E11) ---")
exp_data_9 = experiment_history['iteration_9']

sbml_doc_mod_ic_E11 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(model_E11_sbml_string)
model_mod_ic_E11 = sbml_doc_mod_ic_E11.getModel()
species_4c0q_mod_E11 = model_mod_ic_E11.getSpecies("id_4c0q")
if species_4c0q_mod_E11:
    species_4c0q_mod_E11.setInitialConcentration(2.65) # Perturbed IC
else:
    print("Error: Species id_4c0q not found for IC modification.")
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
model_E11_perturbed_ic_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_mod_ic_E11)

sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic = simulate(model_E11_perturbed_ic_sbml_string)

if sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic is not None and not sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic_iter15", sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic)
    print("Simulated data (Model E11, perturbed ICs) head:")
    print(sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic.head())
    print("Simulated data (Model E11, perturbed ICs) tail:")
    print(sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp_9 = np.interp(exp_data_9['Time'], sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic['Time'], sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp_9 = np.interp(exp_data_9['Time'], sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic['Time'], sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq_9 = np.sum((exp_data_9['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp_9)**2)
    sse_4c0q_9 = np.sum((exp_data_9['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp_9)**2)
    total_sse_9 = sse_fjbq_9 + sse_4c0q_9
    print(f"SSE for id_fjbq (Model E11 vs Exp iter9): {sse_fjbq_9:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model E11 vs Exp iter9): {sse_4c0q_9:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model E11 vs Exp iter9): {total_sse_9:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model E11 with perturbed ICs failed.")

# Print some mid-range values to check for oscillations
if sim_data_E11_default_ic is not None and not sim_data_E11_default_ic.empty:
    print("\nSimulated data (Model E11, default ICs) mid-range (T=10-30):")
    print(sim_data_E11_default_ic[(sim_data_E11_default_ic['Time'] >= 10) & (sim_data_E11_default_ic['Time'] <= 30)])
    
if sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic is not None and not sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic.empty:
    print("\nSimulated data (Model E11, perturbed ICs) mid-range (T=10-30):")
    print(sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic[(sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic['Time'] >= 10) & (sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic['Time'] <= 30)])

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Model E' (Set E11) SBML string created and saved.

--- Simulation for iteration_0 data (Model E', Set E11) ---
Simulated data (Model E11, default ICs) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  5.300000  0.00
1  6.260197  4.107348  0.18
2  6.016290  3.253697  0.36
3  5.988080  2.649951  0.54
4  6.141009  2.233320  0.72
Simulated data (Model E11, default ICs) tail:
        id_fjbq  id_4c0q    Time
996   12.234189  2.56918  179.28
997   12.234189  2.56918  179.46
998   12.234189  2.56918  179.64
999   12.234189  2.56918  179.82
1000  12.234189  2.56918  180.00
SSE for id_fjbq (Model E11 vs Exp iter0): 1.0503e+05
SSE for id_4c0q (Model E11 vs Exp iter0): 4.7652e+03
Total SSE (Model E11 vs Exp iter0): 1.0979e+05

--- Simulation for iteration_9 data (Model E', Set E11) ---
Simulated data (Model E11, perturbed ICs) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  2.650000  0.00
1  6.865646  2.278984  0.18
2  7.156315  2.035135  0.36
3  7.527256  1.886353  0.54
4  7.948219  1.807916  0.72
Simulated data (Model E11, perturbed ICs) tail:
        id_fjbq  id_4c0q    Time
996   12.234189  2.56918  179.28
997   12.234189  2.56918  179.46
998   12.234189  2.56918  179.64
999   12.234189  2.56918  179.82
1000  12.234189  2.56918  180.00
SSE for id_fjbq (Model E11 vs Exp iter9): 1.0473e+05
SSE for id_4c0q (Model E11 vs Exp iter9): 4.7218e+03
Total SSE (Model E11 vs Exp iter9): 1.0945e+05

Simulated data (Model E11, default ICs) mid-range (T=10-30):
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q   Time
56   12.233855  2.569071  10.08
57   12.233934  2.569085  10.26
58   12.234000  2.569100  10.44
59   12.234054  2.569114  10.62
60   12.234097  2.569127  10.80
..         ...       ...    ...
162  12.234189  2.569180  29.16
163  12.234189  2.569180  29.34
164  12.234189  2.569180  29.52
165  12.234189  2.569180  29.70
166  12.234189  2.569180  29.88

[111 rows x 3 columns]

Simulated data (Model E11, perturbed ICs) mid-range (T=10-30):
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q   Time
56   12.234103  2.569131  10.08
57   12.234134  2.569141  10.26
58   12.234157  2.569150  10.44
59   12.234175  2.569158  10.62
60   12.234188  2.569164  10.80
..         ...       ...    ...
162  12.234189  2.569180  29.16
163  12.234189  2.569180  29.34
164  12.234189  2.569180  29.52
165  12.234189  2.569180  29.70
166  12.234189  2.569180  29.88

[111 rows x 3 columns]

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 5/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_9)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (model_A_sbml_iter2, sim_data_A_iter2, model_B_sbml_iter3, sim_data_B_iter3, model_C_sbml_iter4, sim_data_C_iter4, model_D_sbml_iter5, sim_data_D1_iter5, model_D2_sbml_iter6, sim_data_D2_iter6, model_D3_sbml_iter7, sim_data_D3_iter7, model_D5_sbml_iter8, sim_data_D5_iter8, model_D5_mod_sbml_iter10, sim_data_D5_mod_iter10, model_E1_sbml_iter11, sim_data_E1_default_ic_iter11, sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic_iter11, model_E2_sbml_iter12, sim_data_E2_default_ic_iter12, sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic_iter12, model_E4_sbml_iter13, sim_data_E4_default_ic_iter13, sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic_iter13, model_E5_sbml_iter14, sim_data_E5_default_ic_iter14, sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic_iter14, model_E11_sbml_iter15, sim_data_E11_default_ic_iter15, sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic_iter15)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 16
## Thoughts

My previous attempts with Model E' (autocatalytic production of `id_fjbq` inhibited by `id_4c0q` with Hill kinetics for both) have struggled to achieve all objectives: correct steady state, correct initial slopes for both experiments, and oscillations. Parameter Set E11 (`model_E11_sbml_iter15`) satisfied initial slopes but converged to an incorrect steady state (`id_fjbq ≈ 12.23, id_4c0q ≈ 2.57`) and did not oscillate.

I've re-analyzed the conditions and derived a new Parameter Set E13 for Model E'.
The model structure is:
1.  Production of `id_fjbq`: `(P_auto * id_fjbq^h_auto / (K_auto^h_auto + id_fjbq^h_auto)) / (1 + (id_4c0q/K_iS2)^n_iS2)`
2.  Conversion: `id_fjbq -> id_4c0q` (rate `k_conv * id_fjbq`)
3.  Degradation of `id_fjbq`: `id_fjbq -> Ø` (rate `k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq`)
4.  Degradation of `id_4c0q`: `id_4c0q -> Ø` (rate `k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q`)

Parameter Set E13:
-   `P_auto = 12.963`
-   `h_auto = 2.0` (Hill coefficient for `id_fjbq` self-activation)
-   `K_auto = 6.7` (Activation constant for `id_fjbq`)
-   `n_iS2 = 2.0` (Hill coefficient for `id_4c0q` inhibition, reduced from 4 in E11)
-   `K_iS2 = 3.0` (Inhibition constant for `id_4c0q`)
-   `k_conv = 0.42`
-   `k_deg_fjbq = 0.1`
-   `k_deg_4c0q = 2.0`

This set is designed to:
1.  Make `(id_fjbq_ss=2.0, id_4c0q_ss=0.42)` a steady state.
2.  Satisfy the initial slope conditions: `id_fjbq` decreases for default ICs (`iteration_0`), and increases for perturbed ICs (`iteration_9`).
3.  Crucially, the incorrect steady state `(12.23, 2.57)` observed with E11 is *not* a steady state for E13 parameters. This increases the chance that the system will converge to the target `(2.0, 0.42)` steady state.

The main change from E11 is reducing `n_iS2` from 4 to 2, which makes the inhibition by `id_4c0q` less steep. This might affect the propensity to oscillate but could be crucial for the stability of the correct steady state. I will simulate this model with Parameter Set E13 against both experimental datasets.

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# --- Define Model E' SBML generation function (copied from Iteration 13) ---
def create_model_E_prime_sbml(params, base_sbml_string):
    sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(base_sbml_string)
    model = sbml_doc.getModel()

    # Remove all existing parameters and reactions
    num_params = model.getNumParameters()
    for i in range(num_params - 1, -1, -1): model.removeParameter(i)
    num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
    for i in range(num_reactions - 1, -1, -1): model.removeReaction(i)

    for p_id, p_val in params.items():
        p = model.createParameter()
        p.setId(p_id)
        p.setValue(p_val)
        p.setConstant(True)

    r1 = model.createReaction()
    r1.setId("R_prod_fjbq_E_prime")
    r1.setReversible(False); r1.setFast(False)
    p1_prod = r1.createProduct()
    p1_prod.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); p1_prod.setStoichiometry(1.0); p1_prod.setConstant(False)
    kinetic_law_r1_formula = "(P_auto * pow(id_fjbq, h_auto) / (pow(K_auto, h_auto) + pow(id_fjbq, h_auto))) / (1 + pow(id_4c0q/K_iS2, n_iS2))"
    math_ast_r1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r1_formula)
    kl1 = r1.createKineticLaw(); kl1.setMath(math_ast_r1)
    
    r2 = model.createReaction()
    r2.setId("R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q")
    r2.setReversible(False); r2.setFast(False)
    r2_reactant = r2.createReactant(); r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r2_reactant.setConstant(False)
    r2_product = r2.createProduct(); r2_product.setSpecies("id_4c0q"); r2_product.setStoichiometry(1.0); r2_product.setConstant(False)
    kl2 = r2.createKineticLaw(); kl2.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_conv * id_fjbq"))

    r3 = model.createReaction()
    r3.setId("R_deg_fjbq")
    r3.setReversible(False); r3.setFast(False)
    r3_reactant = r3.createReactant(); r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r3_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kl3 = r3.createKineticLaw(); kl3.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq"))

    r4 = model.createReaction()
    r4.setId("R_deg_4c0q")
    r4.setReversible(False); r4.setFast(False)
    r4_reactant = r4.createReactant(); r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_4c0q"); r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r4_reactant.setConstant(False)
    kl4 = r4.createKineticLaw(); kl4.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q"))
    
    writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
    return writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# --- Parameter Set E13 ---
params_E13 = {
    "P_auto": 12.963, "h_auto": 2.0, "K_auto": 6.7, 
    "n_iS2": 2.0, "K_iS2": 3.0,
    "k_conv": 0.42, "k_deg_fjbq": 0.1, "k_deg_4c0q": 2.0
}

# --- Create Model E' SBML string with Parameter Set E13 ---
model_E13_sbml_string = create_model_E_prime_sbml(params_E13, input_sbml_string)
shared_variables.add("model_E13_sbml_iter16", model_E13_sbml_string)
print("Model E' (Set E13) SBML string created and saved.")

# --- Simulate Model E' (Set E13) with default initial conditions (experiment_history['iteration_0']) ---
print("\n--- Simulation for iteration_0 data (Model E', Set E13) ---")
exp_data_0 = experiment_history['iteration_0']
sim_data_E13_default_ic = simulate(model_E13_sbml_string) 

if sim_data_E13_default_ic is not None and not sim_data_E13_default_ic.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_E13_default_ic_iter16", sim_data_E13_default_ic)
    print("Simulated data (Model E13, default ICs) head:")
    print(sim_data_E13_default_ic.head())
    print("Simulated data (Model E13, default ICs) tail:")
    print(sim_data_E13_default_ic.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp_0 = np.interp(exp_data_0['Time'], sim_data_E13_default_ic['Time'], sim_data_E13_default_ic['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp_0 = np.interp(exp_data_0['Time'], sim_data_E13_default_ic['Time'], sim_data_E13_default_ic['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq_0 = np.sum((exp_data_0['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp_0)**2)
    sse_4c0q_0 = np.sum((exp_data_0['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp_0)**2)
    total_sse_0 = sse_fjbq_0 + sse_4c0q_0
    print(f"SSE for id_fjbq (Model E13 vs Exp iter0): {sse_fjbq_0:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model E13 vs Exp iter0): {sse_4c0q_0:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model E13 vs Exp iter0): {total_sse_0:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model E13 with default ICs failed.")

# --- Simulate Model E' (Set E13) with perturbed initial conditions (experiment_history['iteration_9']) ---
print("\n--- Simulation for iteration_9 data (Model E', Set E13) ---")
exp_data_9 = experiment_history['iteration_9']

sbml_doc_mod_ic_E13 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(model_E13_sbml_string)
model_mod_ic_E13 = sbml_doc_mod_ic_E13.getModel()
species_4c0q_mod_E13 = model_mod_ic_E13.getSpecies("id_4c0q")
if species_4c0q_mod_E13:
    species_4c0q_mod_E13.setInitialConcentration(2.65) # Perturbed IC
else:
    print("Error: Species id_4c0q not found for IC modification.")
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
model_E13_perturbed_ic_sbml_string = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_mod_ic_E13)

sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic = simulate(model_E13_perturbed_ic_sbml_string)

if sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic is not None and not sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic.empty:
    shared_variables.add("sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic_iter16", sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic)
    print("Simulated data (Model E13, perturbed ICs) head:")
    print(sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic.head())
    print("Simulated data (Model E13, perturbed ICs) tail:")
    print(sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic.tail())
    
    sim_fjbq_interp_9 = np.interp(exp_data_9['Time'], sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic['Time'], sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic['id_fjbq'])
    sim_4c0q_interp_9 = np.interp(exp_data_9['Time'], sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic['Time'], sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic['id_4c0q'])
    
    sse_fjbq_9 = np.sum((exp_data_9['id_fjbq'] - sim_fjbq_interp_9)**2)
    sse_4c0q_9 = np.sum((exp_data_9['id_4c0q'] - sim_4c0q_interp_9)**2)
    total_sse_9 = sse_fjbq_9 + sse_4c0q_9
    print(f"SSE for id_fjbq (Model E13 vs Exp iter9): {sse_fjbq_9:.4e}")
    print(f"SSE for id_4c0q (Model E13 vs Exp iter9): {sse_4c0q_9:.4e}")
    print(f"Total SSE (Model E13 vs Exp iter9): {total_sse_9:.4e}")
else:
    print("Simulation of Model E13 with perturbed ICs failed.")

# Print some mid-range values to check for oscillations
if sim_data_E13_default_ic is not None and not sim_data_E13_default_ic.empty:
    print("\nSimulated data (Model E13, default ICs) mid-range (T=10-40):")
    print(sim_data_E13_default_ic[(sim_data_E13_default_ic['Time'] >= 10) & (sim_data_E13_default_ic['Time'] <= 40)])
    
if sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic is not None and not sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic.empty:
    print("\nSimulated data (Model E13, perturbed ICs) mid-range (T=10-40):")
    print(sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic[(sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic['Time'] >= 10) & (sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic['Time'] <= 40)])

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Model E' (Set E13) SBML string created and saved.

--- Simulation for iteration_0 data (Model E', Set E13) ---
Simulated data (Model E13, default ICs) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  5.300000  0.00
1  6.421603  4.112991  0.18
2  6.271425  3.271520  0.36
3  6.237805  2.678913  0.54
4  6.302639  2.266755  0.72
Simulated data (Model E13, default ICs) tail:
        id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   11.336519  2.380669  179.28
997   11.336519  2.380669  179.46
998   11.336519  2.380669  179.64
999   11.336519  2.380669  179.82
1000  11.336519  2.380669  180.00
SSE for id_fjbq (Model E13 vs Exp iter0): 8.7356e+04
SSE for id_4c0q (Model E13 vs Exp iter0): 3.9792e+03
Total SSE (Model E13 vs Exp iter0): 9.1335e+04

--- Simulation for iteration_9 data (Model E', Set E13) ---
Simulated data (Model E13, perturbed ICs) head:
    id_fjbq   id_4c0q  Time
0  6.700000  2.650000  0.00
1  6.773144  2.276216  0.18
2  6.922140  2.022749  0.36
3  7.127815  1.857362  0.54
4  7.373942  1.756467  0.72
Simulated data (Model E13, perturbed ICs) tail:
        id_fjbq   id_4c0q    Time
996   11.336519  2.380669  179.28
997   11.336519  2.380669  179.46
998   11.336519  2.380669  179.64
999   11.336519  2.380669  179.82
1000  11.336519  2.380669  180.00
SSE for id_fjbq (Model E13 vs Exp iter9): 8.7056e+04
SSE for id_4c0q (Model E13 vs Exp iter9): 3.9338e+03
Total SSE (Model E13 vs Exp iter9): 9.0990e+04

Simulated data (Model E13, default ICs) mid-range (T=10-40):
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q   Time
56   11.335309  2.380079  10.08
57   11.335542  2.380188  10.26
58   11.335731  2.380278  10.44
59   11.335884  2.380351  10.62
60   11.336008  2.380411  10.80
..         ...       ...    ...
218  11.336518  2.380669  39.24
219  11.336518  2.380669  39.42
220  11.336518  2.380669  39.60
221  11.336518  2.380669  39.78
222  11.336518  2.380669  39.96

[167 rows x 3 columns]

Simulated data (Model E13, perturbed ICs) mid-range (T=10-40):
       id_fjbq   id_4c0q   Time
56   11.336016  2.380416  10.08
57   11.336114  2.380464  10.26
58   11.336193  2.380502  10.44
59   11.336257  2.380534  10.62
60   11.336308  2.380560  10.80
..         ...       ...    ...
218  11.336518  2.380668  39.24
219  11.336518  2.380669  39.42
220  11.336518  2.380669  39.60
221  11.336518  2.380668  39.78
222  11.336518  2.380668  39.96

[167 rows x 3 columns]

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 4/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_9)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (model_A_sbml_iter2, sim_data_A_iter2, model_B_sbml_iter3, sim_data_B_iter3, model_C_sbml_iter4, sim_data_C_iter4, model_D_sbml_iter5, sim_data_D1_iter5, model_D2_sbml_iter6, sim_data_D2_iter6, model_D3_sbml_iter7, sim_data_D3_iter7, model_D5_sbml_iter8, sim_data_D5_iter8, model_D5_mod_sbml_iter10, sim_data_D5_mod_iter10, model_E1_sbml_iter11, sim_data_E1_default_ic_iter11, sim_data_E1_perturbed_ic_iter11, model_E2_sbml_iter12, sim_data_E2_default_ic_iter12, sim_data_E2_perturbed_ic_iter12, model_E4_sbml_iter13, sim_data_E4_default_ic_iter13, sim_data_E4_perturbed_ic_iter13, model_E5_sbml_iter14, sim_data_E5_default_ic_iter14, sim_data_E5_perturbed_ic_iter14, model_E11_sbml_iter15, sim_data_E11_default_ic_iter15, sim_data_E11_perturbed_ic_iter15, model_E13_sbml_iter16, sim_data_E13_default_ic_iter16, sim_data_E13_perturbed_ic_iter16)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 17
## Thoughts

My attempts to parameterize Model E' (autocatalytic production of `id_fjbq` inhibited by `id_4c0q` with Hill kinetics for both activation and inhibition) have been challenging. Parameter Set E13 (`model_E13_sbml_iter16`) correctly captured the initial slope behaviors for both experimental conditions (`iteration_0` and `iteration_9`) but unfortunately converged to an incorrect steady state (`id_fjbq ≈ 11.34, id_4c0q ≈ 2.38`) instead of the target (`2.0, 0.42`), and it did not produce the observed damped oscillations. The resulting SSEs were very high.

The core difficulty lies in finding a parameter set for Model E' that simultaneously satisfies:
1.  The correct steady-state concentrations (`id_fjbq_ss = 2.0`, `id_4c0q_ss = 0.42`).
2.  The correct direction of initial change for `id_fjbq` under default initial conditions (decrease).
3.  The correct direction of initial change for `id_fjbq` under perturbed initial conditions (halved initial `id_4c0q` - increase).
4.  Damped oscillatory behavior towards the steady state, as seen in the experimental data.

The analysis for Parameter Set E15 in the previous iteration showed that satisfying the initial slope conditions while also aiming for the correct steady state with strong inhibition (to promote oscillations) is difficult because the high initial loss rate of `id_fjbq` requires a very high potential production rate, which then seems to lead to a high, stable steady state if not perfectly balanced.

Given the limited iterations remaining and the complexity of manually finding suitable parameters for such a non-linear system, I must choose the model that represents the most significant mechanistic insight gained, even if its quantitative fit is poor. Model E' incorporates the autocatalysis of `id_fjbq` which was crucial to explain the differing initial responses of `id_fjbq` to changes in initial `id_4c0q`. This is a key piece of mechanistic understanding derived from the perturbation experiment.

While Model A (simple inhibition, from `model_A_sbml_iter2`) had a better SSE for the default experiment and matched the steady state, it failed to explain the initial response in the perturbation experiment (`iteration_9`). Model E' with Parameter Set E13, despite its high SSE and incorrect steady-state convergence in simulation, was constructed based on the logic of satisfying the initial slope conditions for both experiments, which Model A could not do.

Therefore, I will submit Model E' with Parameter Set E13 (`model_E13_sbml_iter16`) as my final model. It reflects the hypothesis that `id_fjbq` production involves self-activation and is inhibited by `id_4c0q`. The failure to achieve the correct steady state and oscillations in simulation points to the precise parameter values being incorrect, or possibly that the `(2.0, 0.42)` steady state is unstable for these parameters, with the system being attracted to another stable state. However, the structural components of the model (autocatalysis and inhibition) are based on experimental observations of initial system responses.

## Action

### Submit
```python
import libsbml

# Retrieve the SBML string for Model E' with Parameter Set E13 from shared_variables
final_sbml = shared_variables.access("model_E13_sbml_iter16")

if final_sbml is None:
    # Fallback or error handling if the variable isn't found
    # This should ideally not happen if the previous iteration saved it correctly.
    # As a last resort, I could try to reconstruct it here, but it's better to rely on saved state.
    # For now, let's print an error and submit the base input_sbml_string if E13 is missing.
    print("Error: model_E13_sbml_iter16 not found in shared_variables. Submitting a placeholder.")
    
    # Fallback: Re-create Model E' with Parameter Set E13 if necessary
    # This is to ensure a valid SBML is submitted if the shared variable access fails.
    # Ideally, this code block for re-creation would not be needed.
    
    # --- Define Model E' SBML generation function (copied from Iteration 13/16) ---
    def create_model_E_prime_sbml(params, base_sbml_string_for_fallback):
        sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(base_sbml_string_for_fallback)
        model = sbml_doc.getModel()

        num_params = model.getNumParameters()
        for i in range(num_params - 1, -1, -1): model.removeParameter(i)
        num_reactions = model.getNumReactions()
        for i in range(num_reactions - 1, -1, -1): model.removeReaction(i)

        for p_id, p_val in params.items():
            p = model.createParameter()
            p.setId(p_id)
            p.setValue(p_val)
            p.setConstant(True)

        r1 = model.createReaction()
        r1.setId("R_prod_fjbq_E_prime")
        r1.setReversible(False); r1.setFast(False)
        p1_prod = r1.createProduct()
        p1_prod.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); p1_prod.setStoichiometry(1.0); p1_prod.setConstant(False)
        kinetic_law_r1_formula = "(P_auto * pow(id_fjbq, h_auto) / (pow(K_auto, h_auto) + pow(id_fjbq, h_auto))) / (1 + pow(id_4c0q/K_iS2, n_iS2))"
        math_ast_r1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula(kinetic_law_r1_formula)
        kl1 = r1.createKineticLaw(); kl1.setMath(math_ast_r1)
        
        r2 = model.createReaction()
        r2.setId("R_conv_fjbq_to_4c0q")
        r2.setReversible(False); r2.setFast(False)
        r2_reactant = r2.createReactant(); r2_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); r2_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r2_reactant.setConstant(False)
        r2_product = r2.createProduct(); r2_product.setSpecies("id_4c0q"); r2_product.setStoichiometry(1.0); r2_product.setConstant(False)
        kl2 = r2.createKineticLaw(); kl2.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_conv * id_fjbq"))

        r3 = model.createReaction()
        r3.setId("R_deg_fjbq")
        r3.setReversible(False); r3.setFast(False)
        r3_reactant = r3.createReactant(); r3_reactant.setSpecies("id_fjbq"); r3_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r3_reactant.setConstant(False)
        kl3 = r3.createKineticLaw(); kl3.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_deg_fjbq * id_fjbq"))

        r4 = model.createReaction()
        r4.setId("R_deg_4c0q")
        r4.setReversible(False); r4.setFast(False)
        r4_reactant = r4.createReactant(); r4_reactant.setSpecies("id_4c0q"); r4_reactant.setStoichiometry(1.0); r4_reactant.setConstant(False)
        kl4 = r4.createKineticLaw(); kl4.setMath(libsbml.parseL3Formula("k_deg_4c0q * id_4c0q"))
        
        writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
        return writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

    # Parameter Set E13
    params_E13_fallback = {
        "P_auto": 12.963, "h_auto": 2.0, "K_auto": 6.7, 
        "n_iS2": 2.0, "K_iS2": 3.0,
        "k_conv": 0.42, "k_deg_fjbq": 0.1, "k_deg_4c0q": 2.0
    }
    # Assuming input_sbml_string is available globally as per problem description
    final_sbml = create_model_E_prime_sbml(params_E13_fallback, input_sbml_string)
    print("Fallback: Recreated Model E' (Set E13) for submission.")

# Ensure final_sbml is not None before submission, even if it's just the original incomplete model
if final_sbml is None:
    final_sbml = input_sbml_string # Default to original if all else fails
    print("Critical Error: No model could be prepared. Submitting original incomplete model.")

# The variable `final_sbml` will be picked up by the system.
# print(final_sbml) # Optional: print the SBML string for verification
```
