
                # Interation 0

                ## Task Info
                You are investigating a biological system where all species are observable. Your goal is to discover the missing reactions. You do not need to add new species.


                ## Incomplete SBML Model. You can assess it as input_sbml_string.

                <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<sbml xmlns="http://www.sbml.org/sbml/level2" level="2" version="1">
  <model id="id_1fz1">
    <listOfUnitDefinitions>
      <unitDefinition id="id_x3bb">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="mole" scale="-6"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
      <unitDefinition id="id_1ljm">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="mole" scale="-6"/>
          <unit kind="second" exponent="-1"/>
          <unit kind="litre" exponent="-1"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
      <unitDefinition id="id_6d2q">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="litre"/>
          <unit kind="mole" exponent="-1" scale="-6"/>
          <unit kind="second" exponent="-1"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
      <unitDefinition id="id_p0jk">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="second" exponent="-1"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
      <unitDefinition id="id_gukt">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="mole" scale="-6"/>
          <unit kind="litre" exponent="-1"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
    </listOfUnitDefinitions>
    <listOfCompartments>
      <compartment id="id_utjg" size="1.2e-11"/>
      <compartment id="id_julz" size="1.8e-11"/>
    </listOfCompartments>
    <listOfSpecies>
      <species id="id_udn6" compartment="id_julz" initialConcentration="0"/>
      <species id="id_ml0z" compartment="id_utjg" initialConcentration="0"/>
      <species id="id_aprv" compartment="id_utjg" initialConcentration="0"/>
      <species id="id_j3mt" compartment="id_utjg" initialConcentration="0"/>
      <species id="id_uqzr" compartment="id_julz" initialConcentration="5"/>
      <species id="id_ageg" compartment="id_utjg" initialConcentration="0.7"/>
      <species id="id_4vc0" compartment="id_utjg" initialConcentration="1.6" boundaryCondition="true"/>
      <species id="id_nh4a" compartment="id_utjg" initialConcentration="0"/>
      <species id="id_hdof" compartment="id_julz" initialConcentration="0"/>
      <species id="id_9e2p" compartment="id_julz" initialConcentration="2"/>
      <species id="id_tod7" compartment="id_julz" initialConcentration="0.7"/>
      <species id="id_r693" compartment="id_utjg" initialConcentration="500" boundaryCondition="true"/>
      <species id="id_o2wu" compartment="id_utjg" initialConcentration="0"/>
    </listOfSpecies>
  </model>
</sbml>


                ## Max iterations
                20

                Format your response according to the instructions in the system message.
                
## Thoughts
The goal is to discover the missing biological mechanisms and represent them in an SBML model. I have an initial incomplete model. The best first step is to observe the system's behavior under default conditions to see which species are active and how their concentrations change over time. This will provide a baseline dataset to understand the system dynamics and identify potential reactions that are missing or incomplete in the initial model.

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
    "action": "observe",
    "meta_data": {}
}
```

# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_0
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_0]

Total size: 1001 rows × 14 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_0] for the full data

Time   id_udn6  id_ml0z  id_aprv  id_j3mt  id_uqzr  id_ageg  id_nh4a  id_hdof  id_9e2p  id_tod7  id_o2wu  id_4vc0  id_r693
0         0        0        0        0 5.00e+00 7.00e-01        0        0 2.00e+00 7.00e-01        0 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
2.00e-01  1.90e-05 2.41e-02 3.84e-02 2.25e-02 4.92e+00 6.43e-01 3.34e-03 1.28e-07 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 3.00e-02 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
4.00e-01  8.66e-05 3.00e-02 5.03e-02 6.91e-02 4.84e+00 5.85e-01 6.61e-03 6.45e-07 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 7.82e-02 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
6.00e-01  1.76e-04 3.25e-02 5.86e-02 1.23e-01 4.77e+00 5.34e-01 9.54e-03 1.35e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.24e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
8.00e-01  2.76e-04 3.43e-02 6.65e-02 1.80e-01 4.69e+00 4.88e-01 1.21e-02 2.13e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.65e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
1.00e+00  3.81e-04 3.58e-02 7.46e-02 2.41e-01 4.62e+00 4.48e-01 1.44e-02 2.97e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.02e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
1.20e+00  4.92e-04 3.70e-02 8.29e-02 3.04e-01 4.55e+00 4.13e-01 1.64e-02 3.84e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.34e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
1.40e+00  6.06e-04 3.81e-02 9.13e-02 3.69e-01 4.48e+00 3.82e-01 1.82e-02 4.75e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.62e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
1.60e+00  7.24e-04 3.89e-02 9.98e-02 4.35e-01 4.41e+00 3.55e-01 1.97e-02 5.68e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.87e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
1.80e+00  8.43e-04 3.97e-02 1.08e-01 5.03e-01 4.35e+00 3.31e-01 2.11e-02 6.63e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 3.09e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
2.00e+00  9.64e-04 4.03e-02 1.17e-01 5.71e-01 4.28e+00 3.10e-01 2.23e-02 7.59e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 3.28e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
2.20e+00  1.09e-03 4.08e-02 1.25e-01 6.39e-01 4.22e+00 2.91e-01 2.33e-02 8.56e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 3.45e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
2.40e+00  1.21e-03 4.12e-02 1.33e-01 7.08e-01 4.15e+00 2.75e-01 2.42e-02 9.53e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 3.60e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
2.60e+00  1.33e-03 4.16e-02 1.42e-01 7.76e-01 4.09e+00 2.60e-01 2.51e-02 1.05e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 3.73e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
2.80e+00  1.45e-03 4.19e-02 1.50e-01 8.44e-01 4.03e+00 2.47e-01 2.58e-02 1.15e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 3.85e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
3.00e+00  1.57e-03 4.21e-02 1.57e-01 9.12e-01 3.98e+00 2.35e-01 2.65e-02 1.24e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 3.96e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
3.20e+00  1.70e-03 4.23e-02 1.65e-01 9.79e-01 3.92e+00 2.24e-01 2.71e-02 1.34e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.06e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
3.40e+00  1.81e-03 4.25e-02 1.72e-01 1.05e+00 3.86e+00 2.15e-01 2.76e-02 1.43e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.15e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
3.60e+00  1.93e-03 4.26e-02 1.80e-01 1.11e+00 3.81e+00 2.06e-01 2.81e-02 1.53e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.23e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
3.80e+00  2.05e-03 4.27e-02 1.87e-01 1.18e+00 3.76e+00 1.98e-01 2.86e-02 1.62e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.30e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
4.00e+00  2.16e-03 4.27e-02 1.93e-01 1.24e+00 3.70e+00 1.91e-01 2.90e-02 1.71e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.37e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
4.20e+00  2.28e-03 4.28e-02 2.00e-01 1.30e+00 3.65e+00 1.85e-01 2.93e-02 1.80e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.43e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
4.40e+00  2.39e-03 4.28e-02 2.07e-01 1.36e+00 3.60e+00 1.79e-01 2.97e-02 1.89e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.49e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
4.60e+00  2.50e-03 4.28e-02 2.13e-01 1.42e+00 3.55e+00 1.73e-01 3.00e-02 1.98e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.54e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
4.80e+00  2.61e-03 4.28e-02 2.19e-01 1.48e+00 3.51e+00 1.68e-01 3.03e-02 2.06e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.59e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
5.00e+00  2.71e-03 4.27e-02 2.25e-01 1.54e+00 3.46e+00 1.63e-01 3.06e-02 2.15e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.64e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
5.20e+00  2.82e-03 4.27e-02 2.30e-01 1.60e+00 3.42e+00 1.59e-01 3.08e-02 2.23e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.68e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
5.40e+00  2.92e-03 4.27e-02 2.36e-01 1.66e+00 3.37e+00 1.55e-01 3.10e-02 2.31e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.72e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
5.60e+00  3.02e-03 4.26e-02 2.41e-01 1.71e+00 3.33e+00 1.51e-01 3.13e-02 2.39e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.75e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
5.80e+00  3.12e-03 4.26e-02 2.46e-01 1.77e+00 3.29e+00 1.47e-01 3.15e-02 2.47e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.79e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
6.00e+00  3.22e-03 4.25e-02 2.51e-01 1.82e+00 3.25e+00 1.44e-01 3.16e-02 2.55e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.82e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
6.20e+00  3.31e-03 4.24e-02 2.56e-01 1.87e+00 3.21e+00 1.41e-01 3.18e-02 2.62e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.85e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
6.40e+00  3.40e-03 4.23e-02 2.60e-01 1.92e+00 3.17e+00 1.38e-01 3.20e-02 2.70e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.88e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
6.60e+00  3.50e-03 4.23e-02 2.65e-01 1.97e+00 3.13e+00 1.35e-01 3.21e-02 2.77e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.91e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
6.80e+00  3.58e-03 4.22e-02 2.69e-01 2.02e+00 3.09e+00 1.32e-01 3.23e-02 2.84e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.93e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
7.00e+00  3.67e-03 4.21e-02 2.73e-01 2.07e+00 3.05e+00 1.30e-01 3.24e-02 2.91e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.95e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
7.20e+00  3.76e-03 4.20e-02 2.77e-01 2.12e+00 3.02e+00 1.28e-01 3.25e-02 2.98e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 4.98e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
7.40e+00  3.84e-03 4.19e-02 2.81e-01 2.17e+00 2.98e+00 1.26e-01 3.27e-02 3.05e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 5.00e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
7.60e+00  3.93e-03 4.18e-02 2.85e-01 2.21e+00 2.95e+00 1.24e-01 3.28e-02 3.11e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 5.02e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
7.80e+00  4.01e-03 4.18e-02 2.88e-01 2.26e+00 2.91e+00 1.22e-01 3.29e-02 3.18e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 5.04e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
8.00e+00  4.09e-03 4.17e-02 2.92e-01 2.30e+00 2.88e+00 1.20e-01 3.30e-02 3.24e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 5.06e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
8.20e+00  4.16e-03 4.16e-02 2.95e-01 2.34e+00 2.85e+00 1.18e-01 3.31e-02 3.30e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 5.07e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
8.40e+00  4.24e-03 4.15e-02 2.98e-01 2.38e+00 2.82e+00 1.16e-01 3.32e-02 3.36e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 5.09e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
8.60e+00  4.31e-03 4.14e-02 3.02e-01 2.42e+00 2.79e+00 1.15e-01 3.33e-02 3.42e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 5.11e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
8.80e+00  4.39e-03 4.13e-02 3.05e-01 2.46e+00 2.76e+00 1.13e-01 3.34e-02 3.48e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 5.12e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
9.00e+00  4.46e-03 4.12e-02 3.08e-01 2.50e+00 2.73e+00 1.12e-01 3.34e-02 3.54e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 5.14e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
9.20e+00  4.53e-03 4.11e-02 3.10e-01 2.54e+00 2.70e+00 1.10e-01 3.35e-02 3.59e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 5.15e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
9.40e+00  4.60e-03 4.10e-02 3.13e-01 2.58e+00 2.67e+00 1.09e-01 3.36e-02 3.65e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 5.16e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
9.60e+00  4.66e-03 4.09e-02 3.16e-01 2.62e+00 2.65e+00 1.08e-01 3.37e-02 3.70e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 5.18e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
1.00e+01  4.79e-03 4.08e-02 3.21e-01 2.69e+00 2.59e+00 1.05e-01 3.38e-02 3.80e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 5.20e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 20/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 1
## Thoughts
I have observed the system's behavior under default conditions. Several species concentrations are changing over time, while others remain constant. The constant species `id_4vc0` and `id_r693` are boundary species, which is expected. `id_9e2p` and `id_tod7` are also constant, which suggests they might not be involved in the active reactions or are at a steady state.

The species with changing concentrations are `id_udn6`, `id_ml0z`, `id_aprv`, `id_j3mt`, `id_uqzr`, `id_ageg`, `id_nh4a`, `id_hdof`, and `id_o2wu`. I need to analyze the dynamics of these species to infer potential reactions. Plotting their time courses will be helpful.

I will write Python code to load the experimental data and plot the concentrations of the changing species over time.

## Action

### Code
```python
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Access the experimental data
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Identify species that are changing (excluding boundary species and those that appear constant)
# Based on the subset, id_9e2p and id_tod7 seem constant, 4vc0 and r693 are boundary
changing_species = ['id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_j3mt', 'id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof', 'id_o2wu']

# Plot the time courses of changing species
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
for species in changing_species:
    plt.plot(exp_data['Time'], exp_data[species], label=species)

plt.xlabel('Time')
plt.ylabel('Concentration')
plt.title('Time Course of Changing Species')
plt.legend()
plt.grid(True)
plt.show()

# Also print the initial and final concentrations to confirm which species are changing
print("Initial concentrations:")
print(exp_data.iloc[0])
print("\nFinal concentrations:")
print(exp_data.iloc[-1])

```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 Unauthorized modules matplotlib detected. Only these modules are allowed: numpy, pandas, libsbml, math, scipy, jax, sklearn, io, traceback.

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 19/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 2
## Thoughts
My apologies, I used `matplotlib` which is not in the allowed libraries. I need to analyze the data without plotting. I can still examine the initial and final concentrations and look at the trends in the printed data subset to infer relationships between species.

From the printed data:
- `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are decreasing.
- `id_udn6`, `id_ml0z`, `id_aprv`, `id_j3mt`, `id_nh4a`, `id_hdof`, and `id_o2wu` are increasing.
- `id_9e2p` and `id_tod7` are constant.
- `id_4vc0` and `id_r693` are boundary species and constant.

The decrease in `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` suggests they might be reactants. The increase in the other species suggests they might be products.

Let's look at the compartments. `id_uqzr`, `id_udn6`, `id_hdof`, `id_9e2p`, and `id_tod7` are in compartment `id_julz`. `id_ml0z`, `id_aprv`, `id_j3mt`, `id_ageg`, `id_nh4a`, `id_o2wu`, `id_4vc0`, and `id_r693` are in compartment `id_utjg`.

Since `id_uqzr` is decreasing in `id_julz` and `id_ageg` is decreasing in `id_utjg`, there might be reactions consuming them. The products are appearing in both compartments. This suggests either transport reactions between compartments or separate reactions in each compartment.

Let's consider simple reactions first.
Possibility 1: `id_uqzr` -> products in `id_julz`
Possibility 2: `id_ageg` -> products in `id_utjg`
Possibility 3: `id_uqzr` -> products in `id_utjg` (transport)
Possibility 4: `id_ageg` -> products in `id_julz` (transport)
Possibility 5: `id_uqzr` + `id_ageg` -> products (requires transport or both in one compartment)

Given that `id_uqzr` is in `id_julz` and `id_ageg` is in `id_utjg`, a reaction consuming both would likely involve transport. However, the products appear in both compartments.

Let's look at the initial concentrations:
`id_uqzr`: 5
`id_ageg`: 0.7
Others (except boundary/constant): 0

After 10 seconds:
`id_uqzr`: 2.59 (decreased by ~2.41)
`id_ageg`: 0.105 (decreased by ~0.595)
`id_udn6`: 0.00479 (increased)
`id_ml0z`: 0.0408 (increased)
`id_aprv`: 0.321 (increased)
`id_j3mt`: 2.69 (increased)
`id_nh4a`: 0.0338 (increased)
`id_hdof`: 0.000038 (increased)
`id_o2wu`: 0.520 (increased)

The changes in `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are significant. The changes in products are also significant, especially `id_j3mt` and `id_o2wu`.

Let's hypothesize a simple degradation reaction for `id_uqzr` in `id_julz` and `id_ageg` in `id_utjg`.
Reaction 1: `id_uqzr` -> Products in `id_julz`
Reaction 2: `id_ageg` -> Products in `id_utjg`

Which products are formed from which reactant?
`id_uqzr` is in `id_julz`. Products in `id_julz` are `id_udn6` and `id_hdof`.
`id_ageg` is in `id_utjg`. Products in `id_utjg` are `id_ml0z`, `id_aprv`, `id_j3mt`, `id_nh4a`, and `id_o2wu`.

Let's propose two separate degradation reactions:
Reaction 1: `id_uqzr` -> `id_udn6` + `id_hdof` (in `id_julz`)
Reaction 2: `id_ageg` -> `id_ml0z` + `id_aprv` + `id_j3mt` + `id_nh4a` + `id_o2wu` (in `id_utjg`)

This seems overly complex with many products from a single reactant. Let's reconsider.

Perhaps there's a reaction consuming `id_uqzr` and producing some species, and another reaction consuming `id_ageg` and producing others. Or maybe a reaction consuming one and producing something that is then transported and consumed/produced in the other compartment.

Let's look at the magnitudes of change.
`id_uqzr` decreased by ~2.41
`id_ageg` decreased by ~0.595

Products increased:
`id_udn6`: ~0.00479
`id_ml0z`: ~0.0408
`id_aprv`: ~0.321
`id_j3mt`: ~2.69
`id_nh4a`: ~0.0338
`id_hdof`: ~0.000038
`id_o2wu`: ~0.520

The increase in `id_j3mt` (~2.69) is roughly comparable to the decrease in `id_uqzr` (~2.41). This suggests a potential link, possibly with a stoichiometry close to 1. `id_uqzr` is in `id_julz`, `id_j3mt` is in `id_utjg`. This would require transport.

The increase in `id_o2wu` (~0.520) is roughly comparable to the decrease in `id_ageg` (~0.595). Both are in `id_utjg`. This suggests a potential link, possibly with a stoichiometry close to 1.

Let's hypothesize two main reactions:
Reaction A: `id_uqzr` -> `id_j3mt` (with transport from `id_julz` to `id_utjg`)
Reaction B: `id_ageg` -> `id_o2wu` (in `id_utjg`)

What about the other increasing species (`id_udn6`, `id_ml0z`, `id_aprv`, `id_nh4a`, `id_hdof`)? Their increases are smaller. They could be byproducts of these main reactions or products of other reactions.

Let's try adding the two hypothesized reactions with simple mass action kinetics and stoichiometry of 1, and see how the simulation compares to the data. I'll need to add parameters for the reaction rates. I'll start with arbitrary rate constants and refine later if needed.

Reaction A: `id_uqzr` -> `id_j3mt` (This implies `id_uqzr` is consumed in `id_julz` and `id_j3mt` is produced in `id_utjg`. SBML reactions happen within a compartment. A transport reaction is needed).
Let's model this as a transport reaction: `id_uqzr` (in `id_julz`) -> `id_j3mt` (in `id_utjg`).

Reaction B: `id_ageg` -> `id_o2wu` (in `id_utjg`)

Let's add these two reactions to the SBML model. I'll use `libsbml`. I need to define parameters for the rate constants.

Reaction 1: Transport of `id_uqzr` from `id_julz` to `id_utjg`, potentially transforming into `id_j3mt`. A simple way to model this is a reaction consuming `id_uqzr` in `id_julz` and producing `id_j3mt` in `id_utjg`. This requires the reaction to span compartments, which is not standard in SBML Level 2/3 core. A common way is to model transport explicitly: `id_uqzr_julz` -> `id_uqzr_utjg` followed by `id_uqzr_utjg` -> `id_j3mt_utjg`. However, the problem states I don't need to add new species. This implies the transformation and transport might be modeled as a single reaction with reactants/products in different compartments, or perhaps the species names already imply their compartment location (though the SBML defines compartments explicitly). Let's assume for now a reaction can consume a species in one compartment and produce in another, or that the species `id_uqzr` and `id_j3mt` are somehow linked across compartments in the reaction definition. Looking at the SBML, species are defined within a compartment. A reaction definition links species within the context of that reaction. The standard way is to have a transport reaction moving the species, then a reaction in the destination compartment. Since I cannot add species, the transformation must happen during transport or the species names are misleading. Let's assume a simplified model where a reaction can consume `id_uqzr` (in `id_julz`) and produce `id_j3mt` (in `id_utjg`). This is unusual for standard mass action kinetics within a single reaction definition but let's try it as a hypothesis.

Reaction 1 (Hypothesis): `id_uqzr` (in `id_julz`) -> `id_j3mt` (in `id_utjg`)
Rate law: k1 * [id_uqzr]

Reaction 2 (Hypothesis): `id_ageg` (in `id_utjg`) -> `id_o2wu` (in `id_utjg`)
Rate law: k2 * [id_ageg]

Let's add these reactions to the model. I'll need to add parameters `k1` and `k2`. I'll start with k1=0.1 and k2=0.1 as initial guesses.

```python
import libsbml

# Load the SBML model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add parameters for rate constants
p1 = model.createParameter()
p1.setId("k1")
p1.setValue(0.1)
p1.setConstant(True)

p2 = model.createParameter()
p2.setId("k2")
p2.setValue(0.1)
p2.setConstant(True)

# Add Reaction 1: id_uqzr -> id_j3mt (across compartments)
# This is non-standard. Let's try adding it and see if the simulator accepts it.
# A reaction is defined within a model, not a compartment. Reactants/products have species and stoichiometry.
# The compartment of the species is defined in the species list.
# Let's define the reaction and add the species as reactant/product.
# The rate law will need to reference the species concentrations.

reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
reaction1.setReversible(False)

# Reactant: id_uqzr (in id_julz)
reactant1 = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1.setSpecies("id_uqzr")
reactant1.setStoichiometry(1.0)

# Product: id_j3mt (in id_utjg)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_j3mt")
product1.setStoichiometry(1.0)

# Rate law for Reaction 1: k1 * [id_uqzr]
kinetic_law1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
math_ast1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k1 * id_uqzr") # Use species ID directly
kinetic_law1.setMath(math_ast1)


# Add Reaction 2: id_ageg -> id_o2wu (in id_utjg)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
reaction2.setReversible(False)

# Reactant: id_ageg (in id_utjg)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_ageg")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)

# Product: id_o2wu (in id_utjg)
product2 = reaction2.createProduct()
product2.setSpecies("id_o2wu")
product2.setStoichiometry(1.0)

# Rate law for Reaction 2: k2 * [id_ageg]
kinetic_law2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
math_ast2 = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k2 * id_ageg") # Use species ID directly
kinetic_law2.setMath(math_ast2)

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (visually or numerically)
# For now, let's print the head of the simulated data
print("Simulated data head:")
print(sim_data.head())

# And the tail
print("\nSimulated data tail:")
print(sim_data.tail())

# Compare final concentrations
print("\nExperimental final concentrations:")
print(experiment_history['iteration_0'].iloc[-1])
print("\nSimulated final concentrations:")
print(sim_data.iloc[-1])

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt # Keep import for local plotting if needed, but don't use plt.show() or savefig()

# Load the SBML model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add parameters for rate constants
# Check if parameters already exist before adding
if model.getParameter("k1") is None:
    p1 = model.createParameter()
    p1.setId("k1")
    p1.setValue(0.1)
    p1.setConstant(True)

if model.getParameter("k2") is None:
    p2 = model.createParameter()
    p2.setId("k2")
    p2.setValue(0.1)
    p2.setConstant(True)

# Add Reaction 1: id_uqzr -> id_j3mt (across compartments)
# Check if reaction already exists
if model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt") is None:
    reaction1 = model.createReaction()
    reaction1.setId("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
    reaction1.setReversible(False)

    # Reactant: id_uqzr (in id_julz)
    reactant1 = reaction1.createReactant()
    reactant1.setSpecies("id_uqzr")
    reactant1.setStoichiometry(1.0)

    # Product: id_j3mt (in id_utjg)
    product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
    product1.setSpecies("id_j3mt")
    product1.setStoichiometry(1.0)

    # Rate law for Reaction 1: k1 * [id_uqzr]
    kinetic_law1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
    math_ast1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k1 * id_uqzr") # Use species ID directly
    kinetic_law1.setMath(math_ast1)


# Add Reaction 2: id_ageg -> id_o2wu (in id_utjg)
# Check if reaction already exists
if model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu") is None:
    reaction2 = model.createReaction()
    reaction2.setId("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
    reaction2.setReversible(False)

    # Reactant: id_ageg (in id_utjg)
    reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
    reactant2.setSpecies("id_ageg")
    reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)

    # Product: id_o2wu (in id_utjg)
    product2 = reaction2.createProduct()
    product2.setSpecies("id_o2wu")
    product2.setStoichiometry(1.0)

    # Rate law for Reaction 2: k2 * [id_ageg]
    kinetic_law2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
    math_ast2 = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k2 * id_ageg") # Use species ID directly
    kinetic_law2.setMath(math_ast2)

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Simulated data head:
   id_udn6  id_ml0z  id_aprv  id_j3mt       id_uqzr       id_ageg  id_nh4a  id_hdof  id_9e2p  id_tod7  id_o2wu  id_4vc0  id_r693  Time
0      0.0      0.0      0.0      0.0  5.000000e+00  7.000000e-01      0.0      0.0      2.0      0.7      0.0      1.6    500.0  0.00
1      0.0      0.0      0.0      7.5  7.103177e-38  1.504881e-41      0.0      0.0      2.0      0.7      0.7      1.6    500.0  0.01
2      0.0      0.0      0.0      7.5  3.359349e-38  7.119823e-42      0.0      0.0      2.0      0.7      0.7      1.6    500.0  0.02
3      0.0      0.0      0.0      7.5  7.212009e-42  6.624696e-45      0.0      0.0      2.0      0.7      0.7      1.6    500.0  0.03
4      0.0      0.0      0.0      7.5  6.934341e-42  6.369725e-45      0.0      0.0      2.0      0.7      0.7      1.6    500.0  0.04

Simulated data tail:
      id_udn6  id_ml0z  id_aprv  id_j3mt       id_uqzr       id_ageg  id_nh4a  id_hdof  id_9e2p  id_tod7  id_o2wu  id_4vc0  id_r693   Time
996       0.0      0.0      0.0      7.5  3.723282e-50  6.619354e-52      0.0      0.0      2.0      0.7      0.7      1.6    500.0   9.96
997       0.0      0.0      0.0      7.5  3.721324e-50  6.615874e-52      0.0      0.0      2.0      0.7      0.7      1.6    500.0   9.97
998       0.0      0.0      0.0      7.5  3.719366e-50  6.612394e-52      0.0      0.0      2.0      0.7      0.7      1.6    500.0   9.98
999       0.0      0.0      0.0      7.5  3.717407e-50  6.608914e-52      0.0      0.0      2.0      0.7      0.7      1.6    500.0   9.99
1000      0.0      0.0      0.0      7.5  3.715449e-50  6.605434e-52      0.0      0.0      2.0      0.7      0.7      1.6    500.0  10.00

Experimental final concentrations:
id_udn6      0.004794
id_ml0z      0.040759
id_aprv      0.320706
id_j3mt      2.688295
id_uqzr      2.592793
id_ageg      0.105439
id_nh4a      0.033802
id_hdof      0.000038
id_9e2p      1.999962
id_tod7      0.700000
id_o2wu      0.520000
id_4vc0      1.600000
id_r693    500.000000
Time        10.000000
Name: 1000, dtype: float64

Simulated final concentrations:
id_udn6    0.000000e+00
id_ml0z    0.000000e+00
id_aprv    0.000000e+00
id_j3mt    7.500000e+00
id_uqzr    3.715449e-50
id_ageg    6.605434e-52
id_nh4a    0.000000e+00
id_hdof    0.000000e+00
id_9e2p    2.000000e+00
id_tod7    7.000000e-01
id_o2wu    7.000000e-01
id_4vc0    1.600000e+00
id_r693    5.000000e+02
Time       1.000000e+01
Name: 1000, dtype: float64

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 18/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 3
## Thoughts
The simulation results show that my initial hypothesis with simple degradation reactions and arbitrary rate constants (k1=0.1, k2=0.1) is not accurate.
- `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are consumed far too quickly in the simulation, reaching near zero concentrations, while in the experiment they only decreased partially.
- `id_j3mt` and `id_o2wu` are produced, but their final concentrations (7.5 and 0.7 respectively) don't match the experimental values (~2.69 and ~0.52).
- The other increasing species (`id_udn6`, `id_ml0z`, `id_aprv`, `id_nh4a`, `id_hdof`) are not produced at all in my current model, but they increased in the experiment.

This indicates several issues:
1. The rate constants (k1, k2) are likely incorrect.
2. The stoichiometry of the reactions might be incorrect.
3. There are missing reactions that produce the other increasing species.
4. The assumption about a single reaction spanning compartments (`id_uqzr` -> `id_j3mt`) might be incorrect or the rate law needs to account for compartments/transport. However, the simulator accepted the model, suggesting the species IDs in the rate law are interpreted correctly based on their definition in the model.

Let's refine the hypothesis. The fact that `id_j3mt` increase is roughly proportional to `id_uqzr` decrease, and `id_o2wu` increase is roughly proportional to `id_ageg` decrease still suggests these are the primary reactions. The other increasing species are likely byproducts.

Let's update the reactions to include the other products.
Reaction 1: `id_uqzr` -> `id_j3mt` + `id_udn6` + `id_hdof` (involving `id_julz` and `id_utjg`)
Reaction 2: `id_ageg` -> `id_o2wu` + `id_ml0z` + `id_aprv` + `id_nh4a` (in `id_utjg`)

I need to determine the stoichiometry and refine the rate constants. Stoichiometry can sometimes be inferred from the ratio of changes in concentration, especially early on before saturation or other effects dominate.

Let's look at the changes from t=0 to t=10:
Δ`id_uqzr` ≈ -2.41
Δ`id_ageg` ≈ -0.595

Δ`id_j3mt` ≈ +2.69
Δ`id_o2wu` ≈ +0.520
Δ`id_udn6` ≈ +0.00479
Δ`id_ml0z` ≈ +0.0408
Δ`id_aprv` ≈ +0.321
Δ`id_nh4a` ≈ +0.0338
Δ`id_hdof` ≈ +0.000038

Ratio Δ`id_j3mt` / |Δ`id_uqzr`| ≈ 2.69 / 2.41 ≈ 1.11
Ratio Δ`id_o2wu` / |Δ`id_ageg`| ≈ 0.520 / 0.595 ≈ 0.87

These ratios are close to 1, supporting a 1:1 stoichiometry for the main products. The other products have much smaller changes.

Let's assume the following reactions with stoichiometry 1 for all species involved for now:
Reaction 1: `id_uqzr` -> `id_j3mt` + `id_udn6` + `id_hdof`
Reaction 2: `id_ageg` -> `id_o2wu` + `id_ml0z` + `id_aprv` + `id_nh4a`

I will keep the mass action kinetics:
Rate 1: k1 * [id_uqzr]
Rate 2: k2 * [id_ageg]

I need to find better values for k1 and k2. I can try to fit these parameters to the experimental data. Since I cannot use optimization libraries directly, I will try adjusting the parameters manually based on the simulation results.

The current simulation consumes `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` too fast. This means k1 and k2 are too high. Let's try reducing them significantly.
Current k1=0.1, k2=0.1.
Simulated Δ`id_uqzr` ≈ -5 (consumed almost entirely)
Simulated Δ`id_ageg` ≈ -0.7 (consumed almost entirely)

Experimental Δ`id_uqzr` ≈ -2.41 (from 5) -> consumed ~48%
Experimental Δ`id_ageg` ≈ -0.595 (from 0.7) -> consumed ~85%

The relative consumption rates are different. `id_ageg` is consumed relatively faster than `id_uqzr`. This suggests k2 should be relatively higher than k1, but both should be smaller than 0.1.

Let's try k1 = 0.05 and k2 = 0.1 (keeping k2 the same for now, focusing on k1).
Or maybe k1 = 0.01 and k2 = 0.05?

Let's try k1 = 0.05 and k2 = 0.1 first, and update the SBML model.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables or input_sbml_string if not found
# Assuming shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis") exists from the previous step
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Loading initial input_sbml_string as current_sbml_hypothesis not found.")

sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters k1 and k2
p1 = model.getParameter("k1")
if p1 is not None:
    p1.setValue(0.05)
else:
    # Add if not exists (should exist from previous step)
    p1 = model.createParameter()
    p1.setId("k1")
    p1.setValue(0.05)
    p1.setConstant(True)

p2 = model.getParameter("k2")
if p2 is not None:
    p2.setValue(0.1) # Keep k2 at 0.1 for now
else:
    # Add if not exists (should exist from previous step)
    p2 = model.createParameter()
    p2.setId("k2")
    p2.setValue(0.1)
    p2.setConstant(True)


# Update Reaction 1: id_uqzr -> id_j3mt + id_udn6 + id_hdof
reaction1 = model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
if reaction1 is not None:
    # Clear existing products
    while reaction1.getNumProducts() > 0:
        reaction1.removeProduct(0)

    # Add products
    product1_j3mt = reaction1.createProduct()
    product1_j3mt.setSpecies("id_j3mt")
    product1_j3mt.setStoichiometry(1.0)

    product1_udn6 = reaction1.createProduct()
    product1_udn6.setSpecies("id_udn6")
    product1_udn6.setStoichiometry(1.0) # Assuming stoichiometry 1 for now

    product1_hdof = reaction1.createProduct()
    product1_hdof.setSpecies("id_hdof")
    product1_hdof.setStoichiometry(1.0) # Assuming stoichiometry 1 for now

    # Ensure reactant is still there (should be)
    if reaction1.getNumReactants() == 0 or reaction1.getReactant(0).getSpecies() != "id_uqzr":
         # This shouldn't happen if loading the model from the previous step correctly
         print("Error: Reactant id_uqzr missing in reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
else:
    # This shouldn't happen if loading the model from the previous step correctly
    print("Error: Reaction reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt not found.")


# Update Reaction 2: id_ageg -> id_o2wu + id_ml0z + id_aprv + id_nh4a
reaction2 = model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
if reaction2 is not None:
    # Clear existing products
    while reaction2.getNumProducts() > 0:
        reaction2.removeProduct(0)

    # Add products
    product2_o2wu = reaction2.createProduct()
    product2_o2wu.setSpecies("id_o2wu")
    product2_o2wu.setStoichiometry(1.0) # Assuming stoichiometry 1 for now

    product2_ml0z = reaction2.createProduct()
    product2_ml0z.setSpecies("id_ml0z")
    product2_ml0z.setStoichiometry(1.0) # Assuming stoichiometry 1 for now

    product2_aprv = reaction2.createProduct()
    product2_aprv.setSpecies("id_aprv")
    product2_aprv.setStoichiometry(1.0) # Assuming stoichiometry 1 for now

    product2_nh4a = reaction2.createProduct()
    product2_nh4a.setSpecies("id_nh4a")
    product2_nh4a.setStoichiometry(1.0) # Assuming stoichiometry 1 for now

    # Ensure reactant is still there (should be)
    if reaction2.getNumReactants() == 0 or reaction2.getReactant(0).getSpecies() != "id_ageg":
         # This shouldn't happen if loading the model from the previous step correctly
         print("Error: Reactant id_ageg missing in reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
else:
     # This shouldn't happen if loading the model from the previous step correctly
    print("Error: Reaction reaction_ageg_to_o2wu not found.")


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables or input_sbml_string if not found
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Loading initial input_sbml_string as current_sbml_hypothesis not found.")

sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters k1 and k2
p1 = model.getParameter("k1")
if p1 is not None:
    p1.setValue(0.05)
else:
    p1 = model.createParameter()
    p1.setId("k1")
    p1.setValue(0.05)
    p1.setConstant(True)

p2 = model.getParameter("k2")
if p2 is not None:
    p2.setValue(0.1)
else:
    p2 = model.createParameter()
    p2.setId("k2")
    p2.setValue(0.1)
    p2.setConstant(True)


# Update Reaction 1: id_uqzr -> id_j3mt + id_udn6 + id_hdof
reaction1 = model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
if reaction1 is not None:
    # Clear existing products
    while reaction1.getNumProducts() > 0:
        reaction1.removeProduct(0)

    # Add products
    product1_j3mt = reaction1.createProduct()
    product1_j3mt.setSpecies("id_j3mt")
    product1_j3mt.setStoichiometry(1.0)

    product1_udn6 = reaction1.createProduct()
    product1_udn6.setSpecies("id_udn6")
    product1_udn6.setStoichiometry(1.0)

    product1_hdof = reaction1.createProduct()
    product1_hdof.setSpecies("id_hdof")
    product1_hdof.setStoichiometry(1.0)

    # Ensure reactant is still there (should be)
    if reaction1.getNumReactants() == 0 or reaction1.getReactant(0).getSpecies() != "id_uqzr":
         print("Error: Reactant id_uqzr missing in reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
else:
    # Add Reaction 1 if it doesn't exist (shouldn't happen if loading correctly)
    reaction1 = model.createReaction()
    reaction1.setId("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
    reaction1.setReversible(False)
    reactant1 = reaction1.createReactant()
    reactant1.setSpecies("id_uqzr")
    reactant1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    product1_j3mt = reaction1.createProduct()
    product1_j3mt.setSpecies("id_j3mt")
    product1_j3mt.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    product1_udn6 = reaction1.createProduct()
    product1_udn6.setSpecies("id_udn6")
    product1_udn6.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    product1_hdof = reaction1.createProduct()
    product1_hdof.setSpecies("id_hdof")
    product1_hdof.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    kinetic_law1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
    math_ast1 = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k1 * id_uqzr")
    kinetic_law1.setMath(math_ast1)


# Update Reaction 2: id_ageg -> id_o2wu + id_ml0z + id_aprv + id_nh4a
reaction2 = model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
if reaction2 is not None:
    # Clear existing products
    while reaction2.getNumProducts() > 0:
        reaction2.removeProduct(0)

    # Add products
    product2_o2wu = reaction2.createProduct()
    product2_o2wu.setSpecies("id_o2wu")
    product2_o2wu.setStoichiometry(1.0)

    product2_ml0z = reaction2.createProduct()
    product2_ml0z.setSpecies("id_ml0z")
    product2_ml0z.setStoichiometry(1.0)

    product2_aprv = reaction2.createProduct()
    product2_aprv.setSpecies("id_aprv")
    product2_aprv.setStoichiometry(1.0)

    product2_nh4a = reaction2.createProduct()
    product2_nh4a.setSpecies("id_nh4a")
    product2_nh4a.setStoichiometry(1.0)

    # Ensure reactant is still there (should be)
    if reaction2.getNumReactants() == 0 or reaction2.getReactant(0).getSpecies() != "id_ageg":
         print("Error: Reactant id_ageg missing in reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
else:
    # Add Reaction 2 if it doesn't exist (shouldn't happen if loading correctly)
    reaction2 = model.createReaction()
    reaction2.setId("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
    reaction2.setReversible(False)
    reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
    reactant2.setSpecies("id_ageg")
    reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    product2_o2wu = reaction2.createProduct()
    product2_o2wu.setSpecies("id_o2wu")
    product2_o2wu.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    product2_ml0z = reaction2.createProduct()
    product2_ml0z.setSpecies("id_ml0z")
    product2_ml0z.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    product2_aprv = reaction2.createProduct()
    product2_aprv.setSpecies("id_aprv")
    product2_aprv.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    product2_nh4a = reaction2.createProduct()
    product2_nh4a.setSpecies("id_nh4a")
    product2_nh4a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
    kinetic_law2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
    math_ast2 = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k2 * id_ageg")
    kinetic_law2.setMath(math_ast2)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            2.592793     2.439162e-46
id_ageg            0.105439    -5.601421e-80
id_j3mt            2.688295     7.500000e+00
id_o2wu            0.520000     7.000000e-01
id_udn6            0.004794     5.000000e+00
id_ml0z            0.040759     7.000000e-01
id_aprv            0.320706     7.000000e-01
id_nh4a            0.033802     7.000000e-01
id_hdof            0.000038     5.000000e+00

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 17/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 4
## Thoughts
The simulation results with k1=0.05 and k2=0.1 and stoichiometry 1 for all products are still far from the experimental data.
- `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are still consumed too quickly.
- The products are produced in amounts proportional to their initial concentrations (5 for products of `id_uqzr`, 0.7 for products of `id_ageg`), which is incorrect. This suggests the stoichiometry is wrong, or the rate law is wrong, or both.

Let's re-examine the stoichiometry based on the observed changes over 10 seconds:
Δ`id_uqzr` ≈ -2.41
Δ`id_ageg` ≈ -0.595

Δ`id_j3mt` ≈ +2.69
Δ`id_o2wu` ≈ +0.520
Δ`id_udn6` ≈ +0.00479
Δ`id_ml0z` ≈ +0.0408
Δ`id_aprv` ≈ +0.321
Δ`id_nh4a` ≈ +0.0338
Δ`id_hdof` ≈ +0.000038

Let's try to estimate stoichiometry relative to the main product for each reaction.
For Reaction 1 (`id_uqzr` -> products):
Relative to `id_j3mt`:
`id_uqzr`: |Δ`id_uqzr`| / Δ`id_j3mt` ≈ 2.41 / 2.69 ≈ 0.9 (close to 1)
`id_udn6`: Δ`id_udn6` / Δ`id_j3mt` ≈ 0.00479 / 2.69 ≈ 0.0018
`id_hdof`: Δ`id_hdof` / Δ`id_j3mt` ≈ 0.000038 / 2.69 ≈ 0.000014

For Reaction 2 (`id_ageg` -> products):
Relative to `id_o2wu`:
`id_ageg`: |Δ`id_ageg`| / Δ`id_o2wu` ≈ 0.595 / 0.520 ≈ 1.14 (close to 1)
`id_ml0z`: Δ`id_ml0z` / Δ`id_o2wu` ≈ 0.0408 / 0.520 ≈ 0.078
`id_aprv`: Δ`id_aprv` / Δ`id_o2wu` ≈ 0.321 / 0.520 ≈ 0.617
`id_nh4a`: Δ`id_nh4a` / Δ`id_o2wu` ≈ 0.0338 / 0.520 ≈ 0.065

Based on these ratios, it seems the stoichiometry is not simply 1 for all products.
Reaction 1: `id_uqzr` -> 1 `id_j3mt` + very small amounts of `id_udn6` and `id_hdof`.
Reaction 2: `id_ageg` -> 1 `id_o2wu` + smaller amounts of `id_ml0z`, `id_aprv`, `id_nh4a`.

The very small amounts of `id_udn6` and `id_hdof` might suggest they are produced by a different, slower reaction, or the stoichiometry is indeed very small. The same applies to `id_ml0z`, `id_aprv`, `id_nh4a` from `id_ageg`.

Let's refine the hypothesis again.
Primary reactions with stoichiometry 1 for the main products:
Reaction 1a: `id_uqzr` -> `id_j3mt` (Rate k1 * [id_uqzr])
Reaction 2a: `id_ageg` -> `id_o2wu` (Rate k2 * [id_ageg])

Secondary reactions for the minor products?
Where do `id_udn6`, `id_hdof` come from? They are in compartment `id_julz`. `id_uqzr` is also in `id_julz`. Maybe `id_uqzr` also produces these?
Reaction 1b: `id_uqzr` -> `id_udn6` + `id_hdof` (in `id_julz`)? This would mean `id_uqzr` is consumed in `id_julz` and produces `id_udn6` and `id_hdof` in `id_julz`. The rate could be k3 * [id_uqzr].

Where do `id_ml0z`, `id_aprv`, `id_nh4a` come from? They are in compartment `id_utjg`. `id_ageg` and `id_o2wu` are also in `id_utjg`. Maybe `id_ageg` also produces these?
Reaction 2b: `id_ageg` -> `id_ml0z` + `id_aprv` + `id_nh4a` (in `id_utjg`). The rate could be k4 * [id_ageg].

So the hypothesis is now:
Reaction 1a: `id_uqzr` -> `id_j3mt` (Rate k1 * [id_uqzr]) - This reaction involves transport/transformation from `id_julz` to `id_utjg`.
Reaction 1b: `id_uqzr` -> `id_udn6` + `id_hdof` (Rate k3 * [id_uqzr]) - This reaction is within `id_julz`.
Reaction 2a: `id_ageg` -> `id_o2wu` (Rate k2 * [id_ageg]) - This reaction is within `id_utjg`.
Reaction 2b: `id_ageg` -> `id_ml0z` + `id_aprv` + `id_nh4a` (Rate k4 * [id_ageg]) - This reaction is within `id_utjg`.

Let's update the model with these four reactions and stoichiometry 1 for all products for now. I need to add parameters k3 and k4.
Based on the relative changes:
Δ`id_j3mt` is much larger than Δ`id_udn6` and Δ`id_hdof`. So k1 should be much larger than k3.
Δ`id_o2wu` is larger than Δ`id_ml0z`, Δ`id_aprv`, Δ`id_nh4a`. So k2 should be larger than k4.

Let's try to estimate rate constants based on the initial rate of consumption/production.
Initial rate of `id_uqzr` consumption ≈ (5 - 4.92) / 0.2 = 0.08 / 0.2 = 0.4 (at t=0.2)
Initial [id_uqzr] = 5
k1 + k3 ≈ 0.4 / 5 = 0.08

Initial rate of `id_ageg` consumption ≈ (0.7 - 0.643) / 0.2 = 0.057 / 0.2 = 0.285 (at t=0.2)
Initial [id_ageg] = 0.7
k2 + k4 ≈ 0.285 / 0.7 ≈ 0.4

Initial rate of `id_j3mt` production ≈ 0.0225 / 0.2 = 0.1125 (at t=0.2)
k1 * [id_uqzr] ≈ k1 * 5 ≈ 0.1125 => k1 ≈ 0.0225

Initial rate of `id_o2wu` production ≈ 0.0300 / 0.2 = 0.15 (at t=0.2)
k2 * [id_ageg] ≈ k2 * 0.7 ≈ 0.15 => k2 ≈ 0.214

Using these estimates:
k1 ≈ 0.0225
k1 + k3 ≈ 0.08 => k3 ≈ 0.08 - 0.0225 = 0.0575

k2 ≈ 0.214
k2 + k4 ≈ 0.4 => k4 ≈ 0.4 - 0.214 = 0.186

Let's try these estimated rate constants: k1=0.0225, k2=0.214, k3=0.0575, k4=0.186.
And stoichiometry 1 for all products in their respective reactions.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables or input_sbml_string
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Loading initial input_sbml_string as current_sbml_hypothesis not found.")

sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add/Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0225, "k2": 0.214, "k3": 0.0575, "k4": 0.186}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is None:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setConstant(True)
    param.setValue(param_value)

# Remove old reactions if they exist to avoid duplicates or incorrect structures
if model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt") is not None:
    model.removeReaction(model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt"))
if model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu") is not None:
    model.removeReaction(model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu"))


# Add Reaction 1a: id_uqzr -> id_j3mt (across compartments)
reaction1a = model.createReaction()
reaction1a.setId("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
reaction1a.setReversible(False)
reactant1a = reaction1a.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_uqzr")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1a = reaction1a.createProduct()
product1a.setSpecies("id_j3mt")
product1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law1a = reaction1a.createKineticLaw()
math_ast1a = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k1 * id_uqzr")
kinetic_law1a.setMath(math_ast1a)

# Add Reaction 1b: id_uqzr -> id_udn6 + id_hdof (in id_julz)
reaction1b = model.createReaction()
reaction1b.setId("reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof")
reaction1b.setReversible(False)
reactant1b = reaction1b.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_uqzr")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1b_udn6 = reaction1b.createProduct()
product1b_udn6.setSpecies("id_udn6")
product1b_udn6.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1b_hdof = reaction1b.createProduct()
product1b_hdof.setSpecies("id_hdof")
product1b_hdof.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law1b = reaction1b.createKineticLaw()
math_ast1b = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k3 * id_uqzr")
kinetic_law1b.setMath(math_ast1b)


# Add Reaction 2a: id_ageg -> id_o2wu (in id_utjg)
reaction2a = model.createReaction()
reaction2a.setId("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
reaction2a.setReversible(False)
reactant2a = reaction2a.createReactant()
reactant2a.setSpecies("id_ageg")
reactant2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a = reaction2a.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_o2wu")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law2a = reaction2a.createKineticLaw()
math_ast2a = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k2 * id_ageg")
kinetic_law2a.setMath(math_ast2a)

# Add Reaction 2b: id_ageg -> id_ml0z + id_aprv + id_nh4a (in id_utjg)
reaction2b = model.createReaction()
reaction2b.setId("reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a")
reaction2b.setReversible(False)
reactant2b = reaction2b.createReactant()
reactant2b.setSpecies("id_ageg")
reactant2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b_ml0z = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_ml0z.setSpecies("id_ml0z")
product2b_ml0z.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b_aprv = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_aprv.setSpecies("id_aprv")
product2b_aprv.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b_nh4a = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_nh4a.setSpecies("id_nh4a")
product2b_nh4a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law2b = reaction2b.createKineticLaw()
math_ast2b = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k4 * id_ageg")
kinetic_law2b.setMath(math_ast2b)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables or input_sbml_string
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Loading initial input_sbml_string as current_sbml_hypothesis not found.")

sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add/Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0225, "k2": 0.214, "k3": 0.0575, "k4": 0.186}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is None:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setConstant(True)
    param.setValue(param_value)

# Remove old reactions if they exist to avoid duplicates or incorrect structures
reactions_to_remove = ["reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt", "reaction_ageg_to_o2wu", "reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof", "reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a"]
for rxn_id in reactions_to_remove:
    rxn = model.getReaction(rxn_id)
    if rxn is not None:
        model.removeReaction(rxn)


# Add Reaction 1a: id_uqzr -> id_j3mt (across compartments)
reaction1a = model.createReaction()
reaction1a.setId("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
reaction1a.setReversible(False)
reactant1a = reaction1a.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_uqzr")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1a = reaction1a.createProduct()
product1a.setSpecies("id_j3mt")
product1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law1a = reaction1a.createKineticLaw()
math_ast1a = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k1 * id_uqzr")
kinetic_law1a.setMath(math_ast1a)

# Add Reaction 1b: id_uqzr -> id_udn6 + id_hdof (in id_julz)
reaction1b = model.createReaction()
reaction1b.setId("reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof")
reaction1b.setReversible(False)
reactant1b = reaction1b.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_uqzr")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1b_udn6 = reaction1b.createProduct()
product1b_udn6.setSpecies("id_udn6")
product1b_udn6.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1b_hdof = reaction1b.createProduct()
product1b_hdof.setSpecies("id_hdof")
product1b_hdof.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law1b = reaction1b.createKineticLaw()
math_ast1b = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k3 * id_uqzr")
kinetic_law1b.setMath(math_ast1b)


# Add Reaction 2a: id_ageg -> id_o2wu (in id_utjg)
reaction2a = model.createReaction()
reaction2a.setId("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
reaction2a.setReversible(False)
reactant2a = reaction2a.createReactant()
reactant2a.setSpecies("id_ageg")
reactant2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a = reaction2a.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_o2wu")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law2a = reaction2a.createKineticLaw()
math_ast2a = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k2 * id_ageg")
kinetic_law2a.setMath(math_ast2a)

# Add Reaction 2b: id_ageg -> id_ml0z + id_aprv + id_nh4a (in id_utjg)
reaction2b = model.createReaction()
reaction2b.setId("reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a")
reaction2b.setReversible(False)
reactant2b = reaction2b.createReactant()
reactant2b.setSpecies("id_ageg")
reactant2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b_ml0z = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_ml0z.setSpecies("id_ml0z")
product2b_ml0z.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b_aprv = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_aprv.setSpecies("id_aprv")
product2b_aprv.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b_nh4a = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_nh4a.setSpecies("id_nh4a")
product2b_nh4a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law2b = reaction2b.createKineticLaw()
math_ast2b = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k4 * id_ageg")
kinetic_law2b.setMath(math_ast2b)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 Wrong number or type of arguments for overloaded function 'Model_removeReaction'.
  Possible C/C++ prototypes are:
    Model::removeReaction(unsigned int)
    Model::removeReaction(std::string const &)


## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 16/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 5
## Thoughts
I made a mistake in the `removeReaction` call. It expects an index or an ID string, not the reaction object itself. I need to pass the reaction ID string to `model.removeReaction()`.

Let's fix the code and re-run the simulation with the updated reactions and estimated rate constants.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables or input_sbml_string
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Loading initial input_sbml_string as current_sbml_hypothesis not found.")

sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add/Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0225, "k2": 0.214, "k3": 0.0575, "k4": 0.186}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is None:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setConstant(True)
    param.setValue(param_value)

# Remove old reactions if they exist to avoid duplicates or incorrect structures
reactions_to_remove = ["reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt", "reaction_ageg_to_o2wu", "reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof", "reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a"]
for rxn_id in reactions_to_remove:
    # Check if reaction exists before attempting to remove
    if model.getReaction(rxn_id) is not None:
        model.removeReaction(rxn_id) # Corrected: pass the ID string


# Add Reaction 1a: id_uqzr -> id_j3mt (across compartments)
reaction1a = model.createReaction()
reaction1a.setId("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
reaction1a.setReversible(False)
reactant1a = reaction1a.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_uqzr")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1a = reaction1a.createProduct()
product1a.setSpecies("id_j3mt")
product1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law1a = reaction1a.createKineticLaw()
math_ast1a = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k1 * id_uqzr")
kinetic_law1a.setMath(math_ast1a)

# Add Reaction 1b: id_uqzr -> id_udn6 + id_hdof (in id_julz)
reaction1b = model.createReaction()
reaction1b.setId("reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof")
reaction1b.setReversible(False)
reactant1b = reaction1b.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_uqzr")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1b_udn6 = reaction1b.createProduct()
product1b_udn6.setSpecies("id_udn6")
product1b_udn6.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1b_hdof = reaction1b.createProduct()
product1b_hdof.setSpecies("id_hdof")
product1b_hdof.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law1b = reaction1b.createKineticLaw()
math_ast1b = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k3 * id_uqzr")
kinetic_law1b.setMath(math_ast1b)


# Add Reaction 2a: id_ageg -> id_o2wu (in id_utjg)
reaction2a = model.createReaction()
reaction2a.setId("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
reaction2a.setReversible(False)
reactant2a = reaction2a.createReactant()
reactant2a.setSpecies("id_ageg")
reactant2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a = reaction2a.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_o2wu")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law2a = reaction2a.createKineticLaw()
math_ast2a = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k2 * id_ageg")
kinetic_law2a.setMath(math_ast2a)

# Add Reaction 2b: id_ageg -> id_ml0z + id_aprv + id_nh4a (in id_utjg)
reaction2b = model.createReaction()
reaction2b.setId("reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a")
reaction2b.setReversible(False)
reactant2b = reaction2b.createReactant()
reactant2b.setSpecies("id_ageg")
reactant2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b_ml0z = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_ml0z.setSpecies("id_ml0z")
product2b_ml0z.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b_aprv = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_aprv.setSpecies("id_aprv")
product2b_aprv.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b_nh4a = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_nh4a.setSpecies("id_nh4a")
product2b_nh4a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law2b = reaction2b.createKineticLaw()
math_ast2b = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k4 * id_ageg")
kinetic_law2b.setMath(math_ast2b)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables or input_sbml_string
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Loading initial input_sbml_string as current_sbml_hypothesis not found.")

sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add/Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0225, "k2": 0.214, "k3": 0.0575, "k4": 0.186}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is None:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setConstant(True)
    param.setValue(param_value)

# Remove old reactions if they exist to avoid duplicates or incorrect structures
reactions_to_remove = ["reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt", "reaction_ageg_to_o2wu", "reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof", "reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a"]
for rxn_id in reactions_to_remove:
    # Check if reaction exists before attempting to remove
    if model.getReaction(rxn_id) is not None:
        model.removeReaction(rxn_id) # Corrected: pass the ID string


# Add Reaction 1a: id_uqzr -> id_j3mt (across compartments)
reaction1a = model.createReaction()
reaction1a.setId("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
reaction1a.setReversible(False)
reactant1a = reaction1a.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_uqzr")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1a = reaction1a.createProduct()
product1a.setSpecies("id_j3mt")
product1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law1a = reaction1a.createKineticLaw()
math_ast1a = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k1 * id_uqzr")
kinetic_law1a.setMath(math_ast1a)

# Add Reaction 1b: id_uqzr -> id_udn6 + id_hdof (in id_julz)
reaction1b = model.createReaction()
reaction1b.setId("reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof")
reaction1b.setReversible(False)
reactant1b = reaction1b.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_uqzr")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1b_udn6 = reaction1b.createProduct()
product1b_udn6.setSpecies("id_udn6")
product1b_udn6.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1b_hdof = reaction1b.createProduct()
product1b_hdof.setSpecies("id_hdof")
product1b_hdof.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law1b = reaction1b.createKineticLaw()
math_ast1b = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k3 * id_uqzr")
kinetic_law1b.setMath(math_ast1b)


# Add Reaction 2a: id_ageg -> id_o2wu (in id_utjg)
reaction2a = model.createReaction()
reaction2a.setId("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
reaction2a.setReversible(False)
reactant2a = reaction2a.createReactant()
reactant2a.setSpecies("id_ageg")
reactant2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a = reaction2a.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_o2wu")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law2a = reaction2a.createKineticLaw()
math_ast2a = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k2 * id_ageg")
kinetic_law2a.setMath(math_ast2a)

# Add Reaction 2b: id_ageg -> id_ml0z + id_aprv + id_nh4a (in id_utjg)
reaction2b = model.createReaction()
reaction2b.setId("reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a")
reaction2b.setReversible(False)
reactant2b = reaction2b.createReactant()
reactant2b.setSpecies("id_ageg")
reactant2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b_ml0z = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_ml0z.setSpecies("id_ml0z")
product2b_ml0z.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b_aprv = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_aprv.setSpecies("id_aprv")
product2b_aprv.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b_nh4a = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_nh4a.setSpecies("id_nh4a")
product2b_nh4a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law2b = reaction2b.createKineticLaw()
math_ast2b = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k4 * id_ageg")
kinetic_law2b.setMath(math_ast2b)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            2.592793     1.952692e-49
id_ageg            0.105439     0.000000e+00
id_j3mt            2.688295     2.109375e+00
id_o2wu            0.520000     3.745000e-01
id_udn6            0.004794     3.593750e+00
id_ml0z            0.040759     3.255000e-01
id_aprv            0.320706     3.255000e-01
id_nh4a            0.033802     3.255000e-01
id_hdof            0.000038     3.593750e+00

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 15/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 6
## Thoughts
The simulation results with the estimated rate constants and stoichiometry 1 for all products are still not matching the experimental data well.
- `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are still consumed too quickly.
- The product concentrations are also off, although `id_j3mt` and `id_o2wu` are closer than before.
- The ratios of the minor products (`id_udn6`, `id_hdof` from `id_uqzr`, and `id_ml0z`, `id_aprv`, `id_nh4a` from `id_ageg`) are completely wrong. In the simulation, `id_udn6` and `id_hdof` are produced in equal amounts (stoichiometry 1), and `id_ml0z`, `id_aprv`, `id_nh4a` are produced in equal amounts (stoichiometry 1). This doesn't match the experimental ratios observed earlier (e.g., Δ`id_aprv` is much larger than Δ`id_ml0z` and Δ`id_nh4a`).

This strongly suggests that the stoichiometry of the minor products is not 1. Let's revisit the stoichiometry estimation based on the changes over 10 seconds:

Reaction 1 (`id_uqzr` -> `id_j3mt` + `id_udn6` + `id_hdof`):
Δ`id_uqzr` ≈ -2.41
Δ`id_j3mt` ≈ +2.69
Δ`id_udn6` ≈ +0.00479
Δ`id_hdof` ≈ +0.000038

Let's fix the stoichiometry of `id_uqzr` and `id_j3mt` to 1 (since their changes are roughly equal and they seem to be the main reactant/product).
Stoichiometry of `id_udn6` = Δ`id_udn6` / Δ`id_j3mt` ≈ 0.00479 / 2.69 ≈ 0.0018
Stoichiometry of `id_hdof` = Δ`id_hdof` / Δ`id_j3mt` ≈ 0.000038 / 2.69 ≈ 0.000014

Reaction 2 (`id_ageg` -> `id_o2wu` + `id_ml0z` + `id_aprv` + `id_nh4a`):
Δ`id_ageg` ≈ -0.595
Δ`id_o2wu` ≈ +0.520
Δ`id_ml0z` ≈ +0.0408
Δ`id_aprv` ≈ +0.321
Δ`id_nh4a` ≈ +0.0338

Let's fix the stoichiometry of `id_ageg` and `id_o2wu` to 1 (since their changes are roughly equal and they seem to be the main reactant/product).
Stoichiometry of `id_ml0z` = Δ`id_ml0z` / Δ`id_o2wu` ≈ 0.0408 / 0.520 ≈ 0.078
Stoichiometry of `id_aprv` = Δ`id_aprv` / Δ`id_o2wu` ≈ 0.321 / 0.520 ≈ 0.617
Stoichiometry of `id_nh4a` = Δ`id_nh4a` / Δ`id_o2wu` ≈ 0.0338 / 0.520 ≈ 0.065

These stoichiometry values are quite small for the minor products. Let's update the model with these estimated stoichiometry values and keep the previously estimated rate constants (k1=0.0225, k2=0.214, k3=0.0575, k4=0.186).

Reaction 1a: `id_uqzr` -> 1 `id_j3mt` (Rate k1 * [id_uqzr])
Reaction 1b: `id_uqzr` -> 0.0018 `id_udn6` + 0.000014 `id_hdof` (Rate k3 * [id_uqzr])
Reaction 2a: `id_ageg` -> 1 `id_o2wu` (Rate k2 * [id_ageg])
Reaction 2b: `id_ageg` -> 0.078 `id_ml0z` + 0.617 `id_aprv` + 0.065 `id_nh4a` (Rate k4 * [id_ageg])

Let's implement this.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables or input_sbml_string
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Loading initial input_sbml_string as current_sbml_hypothesis not found.")

sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add/Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0225, "k2": 0.214, "k3": 0.0575, "k4": 0.186}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is None:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setConstant(True)
    param.setValue(param_value)

# Remove old reactions if they exist
reactions_to_remove = ["reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt", "reaction_ageg_to_o2wu", "reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof", "reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a"]
for rxn_id in reactions_to_remove:
    if model.getReaction(rxn_id) is not None:
        model.removeReaction(rxn_id)


# Add Reaction 1a: id_uqzr -> id_j3mt (across compartments)
reaction1a = model.createReaction()
reaction1a.setId("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
reaction1a.setReversible(False)
reactant1a = reaction1a.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_uqzr")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1a = reaction1a.createProduct()
product1a.setSpecies("id_j3mt")
product1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law1a = reaction1a.createKineticLaw()
math_ast1a = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k1 * id_uqzr")
kinetic_law1a.setMath(math_ast1a)

# Add Reaction 1b: id_uqzr -> id_udn6 + id_hdof (in id_julz)
reaction1b = model.createReaction()
reaction1b.setId("reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof")
reaction1b.setReversible(False)
reactant1b = reaction1b.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_uqzr")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1b_udn6 = reaction1b.createProduct()
product1b_udn6.setSpecies("id_udn6")
product1b_udn6.setStoichiometry(0.0018) # Updated stoichiometry
product1b_hdof = reaction1b.createProduct()
product1b_hdof.setSpecies("id_hdof")
product1b_hdof.setStoichiometry(0.000014) # Updated stoichiometry
kinetic_law1b = reaction1b.createKineticLaw()
math_ast1b = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k3 * id_uqzr")
kinetic_law1b.setMath(math_ast1b)


# Add Reaction 2a: id_ageg -> id_o2wu (in id_utjg)
reaction2a = model.createReaction()
reaction2a.setId("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
reaction2a.setReversible(False)
reactant2a = reaction2a.createReactant()
reactant2a.setSpecies("id_ageg")
reactant2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a = reaction2a.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_o2wu")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law2a = reaction2a.createKineticLaw()
math_ast2a = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k2 * id_ageg")
kinetic_law2a.setMath(math_ast2a)

# Add Reaction 2b: id_ageg -> id_ml0z + id_aprv + id_nh4a (in id_utjg)
reaction2b = model.createReaction()
reaction2b.setId("reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a")
reaction2b.setReversible(False)
reactant2b = reaction2b.createReactant()
reactant2b.setSpecies("id_ageg")
reactant2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b_ml0z = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_ml0z.setSpecies("id_ml0z")
product2b_ml0z.setStoichiometry(0.078) # Updated stoichiometry
product2b_aprv = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_aprv.setSpecies("id_aprv")
product2b_aprv.setStoichiometry(0.617) # Updated stoichiometry
product2b_nh4a = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_nh4a.setSpecies("id_nh4a")
product2b_nh4a.setStoichiometry(0.065) # Updated stoichiometry
kinetic_law2b = reaction2b.createKineticLaw()
math_ast2b = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k4 * id_ageg")
kinetic_law2b.setMath(math_ast2b)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables or input_sbml_string
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Loading initial input_sbml_string as current_sbml_hypothesis not found.")

sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add/Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0225, "k2": 0.214, "k3": 0.0575, "k4": 0.186}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is None:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setConstant(True)
    param.setValue(param_value)

# Remove old reactions if they exist
reactions_to_remove = ["reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt", "reaction_ageg_to_o2wu", "reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof", "reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a"]
for rxn_id in reactions_to_remove:
    if model.getReaction(rxn_id) is not None:
        model.removeReaction(rxn_id)


# Add Reaction 1a: id_uqzr -> id_j3mt (across compartments)
reaction1a = model.createReaction()
reaction1a.setId("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
reaction1a.setReversible(False)
reactant1a = reaction1a.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_uqzr")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1a = reaction1a.createProduct()
product1a.setSpecies("id_j3mt")
product1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law1a = reaction1a.createKineticLaw()
math_ast1a = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k1 * id_uqzr")
kinetic_law1a.setMath(math_ast1a)

# Add Reaction 1b: id_uqzr -> id_udn6 + id_hdof (in id_julz)
reaction1b = model.createReaction()
reaction1b.setId("reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof")
reaction1b.setReversible(False)
reactant1b = reaction1b.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_uqzr")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1b_udn6 = reaction1b.createProduct()
product1b_udn6.setSpecies("id_udn6")
product1b_udn6.setStoichiometry(0.0018) # Updated stoichiometry
product1b_hdof = reaction1b.createProduct()
product1b_hdof.setSpecies("id_hdof")
product1b_hdof.setStoichiometry(0.000014) # Updated stoichiometry
kinetic_law1b = reaction1b.createKineticLaw()
math_ast1b = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k3 * id_uqzr")
kinetic_law1b.setMath(math_ast1b)


# Add Reaction 2a: id_ageg -> id_o2wu (in id_utjg)
reaction2a = model.createReaction()
reaction2a.setId("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
reaction2a.setReversible(False)
reactant2a = reaction2a.createReactant()
reactant2a.setSpecies("id_ageg")
reactant2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a = reaction2a.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_o2wu")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
kinetic_law2a = reaction2a.createKineticLaw()
math_ast2a = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k2 * id_ageg")
kinetic_law2a.setMath(math_ast2a)

# Add Reaction 2b: id_ageg -> id_ml0z + id_aprv + id_nh4a (in id_utjg)
reaction2b = model.createReaction()
reaction2b.setId("reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a")
reaction2b.setReversible(False)
reactant2b = reaction2b.createReactant()
reactant2b.setSpecies("id_ageg")
reactant2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b_ml0z = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_ml0z.setSpecies("id_ml0z")
product2b_ml0z.setStoichiometry(0.078) # Updated stoichiometry
product2b_aprv = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_aprv.setSpecies("id_aprv")
product2b_aprv.setStoichiometry(0.617) # Updated stoichiometry
product2b_nh4a = reaction2b.createProduct()
product2b_nh4a.setSpecies("id_nh4a")
product2b_nh4a.setStoichiometry(0.065) # Updated stoichiometry
kinetic_law2b = reaction2b.createKineticLaw()
math_ast2b = libsbml.parseL3Formula("k4 * id_ageg")
kinetic_law2b.setMath(math_ast2b)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            2.592793     4.707959e-48
id_ageg            0.105439    -3.017384e-96
id_j3mt            2.688295     2.109375e+00
id_o2wu            0.520000     3.745000e-01
id_udn6            0.004794     6.468750e-03
id_ml0z            0.040759     2.538900e-02
id_aprv            0.320706     2.008335e-01
id_nh4a            0.033802     2.115750e-02
id_hdof            0.000038     5.031250e-05

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 14/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 7
## Thoughts
The simulation results are getting closer, especially for the minor products, but `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are still consumed too quickly, and the main products `id_j3mt` and `id_o2wu` are not reaching the correct final concentrations.

Let's re-evaluate the rate constants. The fact that the reactants are consumed too fast suggests the total consumption rate (sum of rates of reactions consuming them) is too high.
Total rate consuming `id_uqzr` = (k1 + k3) * [id_uqzr]
Total rate consuming `id_ageg` = (k2 + k4) * [id_ageg]

From the initial rate estimation:
k1 + k3 ≈ 0.08
k2 + k4 ≈ 0.4

Let's look at the final concentrations again:
Experimental: `id_uqzr` ≈ 2.59 (started at 5), `id_ageg` ≈ 0.105 (started at 0.7)
Simulated: `id_uqzr` ≈ 0, `id_ageg` ≈ 0

The simulation consumes almost all of the reactants, while the experiment consumes only about half of `id_uqzr` and most of `id_ageg`. This means the overall rates in the simulation are still too high, especially for `id_uqzr`.

Let's try reducing the rate constants further.
Current: k1=0.0225, k3=0.0575 (sum=0.08), k2=0.214, k4=0.186 (sum=0.4)

Let's try halving the rates for `id_uqzr` consumption:
New k1 + k3 ≈ 0.04
Let's keep the ratio k1/k3 roughly the same: k1 ≈ 0.0225 / 0.08 * 0.04 ≈ 0.01125, k3 ≈ 0.0575 / 0.08 * 0.04 ≈ 0.02875.
So, k1 = 0.01125, k3 = 0.02875.

For `id_ageg`, the consumption is closer but still too fast. Let's try reducing the rates by about 25%:
New k2 + k4 ≈ 0.4 * 0.75 = 0.3
Let's keep the ratio k2/k4 roughly the same: k2 ≈ 0.214 / 0.4 * 0.3 ≈ 0.1605, k4 ≈ 0.186 / 0.4 * 0.3 ≈ 0.1395.
So, k2 = 0.1605, k4 = 0.1395.

New parameters: k1=0.01125, k2=0.1605, k3=0.02875, k4=0.1395.
Stoichiometry remains as estimated in the previous step.

Let's update the model and simulate again.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case, though it should be in shared_variables
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.01125, "k2": 0.1605, "k3": 0.02875, "k4": 0.1395}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        # This should not happen if loading from shared_variables correctly, but add defensively
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)


# Reactions should already exist from the previous step, no need to add/remove structure, just parameters are updated.
# Verify reactions exist (optional, for debugging)
# reaction1a = model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
# reaction1b = model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof")
# reaction2a = model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
# reaction2b = model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a")
# if not all([reaction1a, reaction1b, reaction2a, reaction2b]):
#     print("Error: One or more reactions not found in the loaded model.")


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case, though it should be in shared_variables
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.01125, "k2": 0.1605, "k3": 0.02875, "k4": 0.1395}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        # This should not happen if loading from shared_variables correctly, but add defensively
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)


# Reactions should already exist from the previous step, no need to add/remove structure, just parameters are updated.
# Verify reactions exist (optional, for debugging)
# reaction1a = model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
# reaction1b = model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof")
# reaction2a = model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
# reaction2b = model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a")
# if not all([reaction1a, reaction1b, reaction2a, reaction2b]):
#     print("Error: One or more reactions not found in the loaded model.")


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            2.592793     1.419140e-42
id_ageg            0.105439    -1.495662e-96
id_j3mt            2.688295     2.109375e+00
id_o2wu            0.520000     3.745000e-01
id_udn6            0.004794     6.468750e-03
id_ml0z            0.040759     2.538900e-02
id_aprv            0.320706     2.008335e-01
id_nh4a            0.033802     2.115750e-02
id_hdof            0.000038     5.031250e-05

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 13/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 8
## Thoughts
The simulation results are still not matching the experimental data well. The reactants `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are still being consumed too quickly, and consequently, the products are not reaching the correct final concentrations.

Let's look at the final concentrations again:
Experimental:
`id_uqzr`: 2.592793 (started at 5) -> consumed ~2.407
`id_ageg`: 0.105439 (started at 0.7) -> consumed ~0.594

Simulated:
`id_uqzr`: ~0 (consumed almost entirely)
`id_ageg`: ~0 (consumed almost entirely)

The simulation is consuming significantly more `id_uqzr` than the experiment, and slightly more `id_ageg`. This confirms the overall consumption rates (k1+k3 and k2+k4) are still too high.

Let's try reducing the rate constants again.
Current: k1=0.01125, k3=0.02875 (sum=0.04), k2=0.1605, k4=0.1395 (sum=0.3)

Let's aim for the simulation to consume roughly the same amount of reactants as the experiment.
For `id_uqzr`, the experiment consumed ~2.407 out of 5. The simulation consumed ~5. The rate needs to be reduced by a factor of roughly 2.407 / 5 ≈ 0.48.
New k1 + k3 ≈ 0.04 * 0.48 ≈ 0.0192
Let's keep the ratio k1/k3: k1 ≈ 0.01125 / 0.04 * 0.0192 ≈ 0.0054, k3 ≈ 0.02875 / 0.04 * 0.0192 ≈ 0.0138.
So, k1 = 0.0054, k3 = 0.0138.

For `id_ageg`, the experiment consumed ~0.594 out of 0.7. The simulation consumed ~0.7. The rate needs to be reduced by a factor of roughly 0.594 / 0.7 ≈ 0.85.
New k2 + k4 ≈ 0.3 * 0.85 ≈ 0.255
Let's keep the ratio k2/k4: k2 ≈ 0.1605 / 0.3 * 0.255 ≈ 0.1364, k4 ≈ 0.1395 / 0.3 * 0.255 ≈ 0.1186.
So, k2 = 0.1364, k4 = 0.1186.

New parameters: k1=0.0054, k2=0.1364, k3=0.0138, k4=0.1186.
Stoichiometry remains the same.

Let's update the model and simulate again.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0054, "k2": 0.1364, "k3": 0.0138, "k4": 0.1186}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0054, "k2": 0.1364, "k3": 0.0138, "k4": 0.1186}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            2.592793    -2.504003e-45
id_ageg            0.105439   -1.172682e-113
id_j3mt            2.688295     2.109375e+00
id_o2wu            0.520000     3.744314e-01
id_udn6            0.004794     6.468750e-03
id_ml0z            0.040759     2.539435e-02
id_aprv            0.320706     2.008758e-01
id_nh4a            0.033802     2.116196e-02
id_hdof            0.000038     5.031250e-05

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 12/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 9
## Thoughts
The simulation is still consuming the reactants too quickly, although the final concentrations of the minor products are getting closer. The main products (`id_j3mt` and `id_o2wu`) are still off, likely because their production is tied to the over-consumed reactants.

Let's look at the final concentrations again:
Experimental:
`id_uqzr`: 2.592793
`id_ageg`: 0.105439

Simulated:
`id_uqzr`: ~0
`id_ageg`: ~0

The simulation is still consuming almost all of `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg`. This means the total consumption rates (k1+k3 and k2+k4) are still too high.

Let's try reducing the rates again.
Current: k1=0.0054, k3=0.0138 (sum=0.0192), k2=0.1364, k4=0.1186 (sum=0.255)

For `id_uqzr`, the simulation consumed ~5, experiment consumed ~2.407. Need to reduce rate by factor ~0.48.
New k1 + k3 ≈ 0.0192 * 0.48 ≈ 0.0092
Let's keep the ratio k1/k3: k1 ≈ 0.0054 / 0.0192 * 0.0092 ≈ 0.0026, k3 ≈ 0.0138 / 0.0192 * 0.0092 ≈ 0.0066.
So, k1 = 0.0026, k3 = 0.0066.

For `id_ageg`, the simulation consumed ~0.7, experiment consumed ~0.594. Need to reduce rate by factor ~0.85.
New k2 + k4 ≈ 0.255 * 0.85 ≈ 0.21675
Let's keep the ratio k2/k4: k2 ≈ 0.1364 / 0.255 * 0.21675 ≈ 0.1158, k4 ≈ 0.1186 / 0.255 * 0.21675 ≈ 0.1008.
So, k2 = 0.1158, k4 = 0.1008.

New parameters: k1=0.0026, k2=0.1158, k3=0.0066, k4=0.1008.
Stoichiometry remains the same.

Let's update the model and simulate again.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0026, "k2": 0.1158, "k3": 0.0066, "k4": 0.1008}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0026, "k2": 0.1158, "k3": 0.0066, "k4": 0.1008}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            2.592793    -1.611217e-42
id_ageg            0.105439     8.710097e-96
id_j3mt            2.688295     2.119565e+00
id_o2wu            0.520000     3.742382e-01
id_udn6            0.004794     6.456522e-03
id_ml0z            0.040759     2.540942e-02
id_aprv            0.320706     2.009950e-01
id_nh4a            0.033802     2.117452e-02
id_hdof            0.000038     5.021739e-05

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 11/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 10
## Thoughts
The simulation is still consuming the reactants too quickly. The final concentrations of `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are still close to zero in the simulation, while they are significantly higher in the experiment. This indicates the overall consumption rates (k1+k3 and k2+k4) are still too high.

Let's try reducing the rates again.
Current: k1=0.0026, k3=0.0066 (sum=0.0092), k2=0.1158, k4=0.1008 (sum=0.2166)

For `id_uqzr`, the simulation consumed ~5, experiment consumed ~2.407. Need to reduce rate by factor ~0.48.
New k1 + k3 ≈ 0.0092 * 0.48 ≈ 0.0044
Let's keep the ratio k1/k3: k1 ≈ 0.0026 / 0.0092 * 0.0044 ≈ 0.0012, k3 ≈ 0.0066 / 0.0092 * 0.0044 ≈ 0.0032.
So, k1 = 0.0012, k3 = 0.0032.

For `id_ageg`, the simulation consumed ~0.7, experiment consumed ~0.594. Need to reduce rate by factor ~0.85.
New k2 + k4 ≈ 0.2166 * 0.85 ≈ 0.184
Let's keep the ratio k2/k4: k2 ≈ 0.1158 / 0.2166 * 0.184 ≈ 0.0982, k4 ≈ 0.1008 / 0.2166 * 0.184 ≈ 0.0856.
So, k2 = 0.0982, k4 = 0.0856.

New parameters: k1=0.0012, k2=0.0982, k3=0.0032, k4=0.0856.
Stoichiometry remains the same.

Let's update the model and simulate again.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0012, "k2": 0.0982, "k3": 0.0032, "k4": 0.0856}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0012, "k2": 0.0982, "k3": 0.0032, "k4": 0.0856}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            2.592793    -1.827954e-45
id_ageg            0.105439     0.000000e+00
id_j3mt            2.688295     2.045455e+00
id_o2wu            0.520000     3.739935e-01
id_udn6            0.004794     6.545455e-03
id_ml0z            0.040759     2.542851e-02
id_aprv            0.320706     2.011460e-01
id_nh4a            0.033802     2.119042e-02
id_hdof            0.000038     5.090909e-05

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 10/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 11
## Thoughts
The simulation is still consuming the reactants too quickly. The final concentrations of `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are still close to zero in the simulation, while they are significantly higher in the experiment. This indicates the overall consumption rates (k1+k3 and k2+k4) are still too high.

Let's try reducing the rates again.
Current: k1=0.0012, k3=0.0032 (sum=0.0044), k2=0.0982, k4=0.0856 (sum=0.1838)

For `id_uqzr`, the simulation consumed ~5, experiment consumed ~2.407. Need to reduce rate by factor ~0.48.
New k1 + k3 ≈ 0.0044 * 0.48 ≈ 0.0021
Let's keep the ratio k1/k3: k1 ≈ 0.0012 / 0.0044 * 0.0021 ≈ 0.00057, k3 ≈ 0.0032 / 0.0044 * 0.0021 ≈ 0.00153.
So, k1 = 0.00057, k3 = 0.00153.

For `id_ageg`, the simulation consumed ~0.7, experiment consumed ~0.594. Need to reduce rate by factor ~0.85.
New k2 + k4 ≈ 0.1838 * 0.85 ≈ 0.1562
Let's keep the ratio k2/k4: k2 ≈ 0.0982 / 0.1838 * 0.1562 ≈ 0.0834, k4 ≈ 0.0856 / 0.1838 * 0.1562 ≈ 0.0728.
So, k2 = 0.0834, k4 = 0.0728.

New parameters: k1=0.00057, k2=0.0834, k3=0.00153, k4=0.0728.
Stoichiometry remains the same.

Let's update the model and simulate again.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.00057, "k2": 0.0834, "k3": 0.00153, "k4": 0.0728}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.00057, "k2": 0.0834, "k3": 0.00153, "k4": 0.0728}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            2.592793    -5.896964e-42
id_ageg            0.105439     0.000000e+00
id_j3mt            2.688295     2.035714e+00
id_o2wu            0.520000     3.737516e-01
id_udn6            0.004794     6.557143e-03
id_ml0z            0.040759     2.544738e-02
id_aprv            0.320706     2.012953e-01
id_nh4a            0.033802     2.120615e-02
id_hdof            0.000038     5.100000e-05

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 9/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 12
## Thoughts
The simulation is still consuming the reactants too quickly. The final concentrations of `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are still close to zero in the simulation, while they are significantly higher in the experiment. This indicates the overall consumption rates (k1+k3 and k2+k4) are still too high.

My manual parameter tuning based on the final concentrations is not converging well. The issue might be that the simple first-order kinetics (mass action) is not the correct rate law, or the stoichiometry is still not precise enough, or there are other reactions involved.

Let's re-examine the stoichiometry based on the changes over 10 seconds. The previous estimates were:
Reaction 1 (`id_uqzr` -> `id_j3mt` + `id_udn6` + `id_hdof`):
Stoichiometry of `id_j3mt` ≈ 1
Stoichiometry of `id_udn6` ≈ 0.0018
Stoichiometry of `id_hdof` ≈ 0.000014

Reaction 2 (`id_ageg` -> `id_o2wu` + `id_ml0z` + `id_aprv` + `id_nh4a`):
Stoichiometry of `id_o2wu` ≈ 1
Stoichiometry of `id_ml0z` ≈ 0.078
Stoichiometry of `id_aprv` ≈ 0.617
Stoichiometry of `id_nh4a` ≈ 0.065

These stoichiometry values for minor products are very small. It's possible they are produced by these reactions with these small coefficients.

Let's try to refine the rate constants again, focusing on getting the reactant consumption right.
Experimental consumption: Δ`id_uqzr` ≈ 2.407, Δ`id_ageg` ≈ 0.594.
Initial concentrations: `id_uqzr` = 5, `id_ageg` = 0.7.

Let's try to set the total consumption rates such that the amount consumed over 10 seconds is closer to the experimental values.
Average rate of `id_uqzr` consumption ≈ 2.407 / 10 = 0.2407
Average rate of `id_ageg` consumption ≈ 0.594 / 10 = 0.0594

Assuming first-order kinetics, the rate decreases as the reactant is consumed.
Rate = k * [S]. The total amount consumed is related to the integral of the rate.
Let's try to adjust the total rate constants (k1+k3) and (k2+k4) to match the total consumption.

Let K_uqzr = k1 + k3 and K_ageg = k2 + k4.
Rate of `id_uqzr` consumption = K_uqzr * [id_uqzr]
Rate of `id_ageg` consumption = K_ageg * [id_ageg]

Let's try to estimate K_uqzr and K_ageg by aiming for the correct final concentration.
If [S](t) = [S](0) * exp(-K*t), then K = -ln([S](t)/[S](0)) / t
For `id_uqzr`: K_uqzr ≈ -ln(2.592793 / 5) / 10 ≈ -ln(0.5185) / 10 ≈ -(-0.656) / 10 ≈ 0.0656
For `id_ageg`: K_ageg ≈ -ln(0.105439 / 0.7) / 10 ≈ -ln(0.1506) / 10 ≈ -(-1.893) / 10 ≈ 0.1893

So, let's aim for K_uqzr = k1 + k3 ≈ 0.0656 and K_ageg = k2 + k4 ≈ 0.1893.
Let's keep the ratios of k1/k3 and k2/k4 as previously estimated:
k1 / k3 ≈ 0.0225 / 0.0575 ≈ 0.39
k2 / k4 ≈ 0.214 / 0.186 ≈ 1.15

k1 = 0.39 * k3
k1 + k3 = 0.0656 => 0.39*k3 + k3 = 0.0656 => 1.39*k3 = 0.0656 => k3 ≈ 0.0472
k1 ≈ 0.39 * 0.0472 ≈ 0.0184

k2 = 1.15 * k4
k2 + k4 = 0.1893 => 1.15*k4 + k4 = 0.1893 => 2.15*k4 = 0.1893 => k4 ≈ 0.0880
k2 ≈ 1.15 * 0.0880 ≈ 0.1012

New parameters: k1=0.0184, k2=0.1012, k3=0.0472, k4=0.0880.
Stoichiometry remains the same.

Let's update the model and simulate again.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0184, "k2": 0.1012, "k3": 0.0472, "k4": 0.0880}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0184, "k2": 0.1012, "k3": 0.0472, "k4": 0.0880}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model
sim_data = simulate(updated_sbml)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            2.592793    -1.076968e-46
id_ageg            0.105439     0.000000e+00
id_j3mt            2.688295     2.103659e+00
id_o2wu            0.520000     3.744186e-01
id_udn6            0.004794     6.475610e-03
id_ml0z            0.040759     2.539535e-02
id_aprv            0.320706     2.008837e-01
id_nh4a            0.033802     2.116279e-02
id_hdof            0.000038     5.036585e-05

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 8/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 13
## Thoughts
The simulation is still consuming the reactants too quickly. The final concentrations of `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are still close to zero in the simulation, while they are significantly higher in the experiment. This indicates the overall consumption rates (k1+k3 and k2+k4) are still too high.

My manual parameter tuning based on the final concentrations is not working well. The exponential decay assumption for estimating K might be too simplistic if the rates are not purely first-order or if there are other factors influencing the reaction rates.

Let's reconsider the stoichiometry. While the ratios of changes suggested the current stoichiometry, these were based on the *total* change over 10 seconds, not the instantaneous rates.

Let's try a different approach. Instead of manually tuning, let's try to get more data to constrain the model better. Perturbing the initial concentrations of the reactants (`id_uqzr` and `id_ageg`) might provide more insight into the rate laws and stoichiometry.

I will design an experiment where I change the initial concentrations of `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` and observe the system's response. This will help determine if the reaction rates are indeed first-order with respect to these species and provide more data points for parameter estimation.

I will try changing `id_uqzr` to a different value (e.g., 2.5, half of the original 5) and `id_ageg` to a different value (e.g., 0.35, half of the original 0.7).

## Action

### Experiment
```json
{
    "action": "change_initial_concentration",
    "meta_data": {
        "id_uqzr": 2.5,
        "id_ageg": 0.35
    }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_13
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_13]

Total size: 1001 rows × 14 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_13] for the full data

Time   id_udn6  id_ml0z  id_aprv  id_j3mt  id_uqzr  id_ageg  id_nh4a  id_hdof  id_9e2p  id_tod7  id_o2wu  id_4vc0  id_r693
0         0        0        0        0 2.50e+00 3.50e-01        0        0 2.00e+00 7.00e-01        0 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
2.00e-01  8.72e-06 9.39e-03 2.95e-02 1.07e-02 2.46e+00 3.31e-01 1.10e-03 5.80e-08 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 8.37e-03 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
4.00e-01  4.48e-05 1.29e-02 4.15e-02 3.66e-02 2.42e+00 3.11e-01 2.24e-03 3.32e-07 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.34e-02 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
6.00e-01  9.61e-05 1.45e-02 4.83e-02 6.78e-02 2.38e+00 2.93e-01 3.28e-03 7.34e-07 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 3.91e-02 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
8.00e-01  1.54e-04 1.53e-02 5.35e-02 1.01e-01 2.35e+00 2.77e-01 4.23e-03 1.19e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 5.39e-02 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
1.00e+00  2.14e-04 1.59e-02 5.81e-02 1.35e-01 2.31e+00 2.61e-01 5.08e-03 1.67e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 6.75e-02 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
1.20e+00  2.75e-04 1.64e-02 6.25e-02 1.70e-01 2.28e+00 2.48e-01 5.85e-03 2.15e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 7.98e-02 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
1.40e+00  3.38e-04 1.68e-02 6.68e-02 2.05e-01 2.24e+00 2.36e-01 6.55e-03 2.65e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 9.11e-02 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
1.60e+00  4.00e-04 1.72e-02 7.10e-02 2.40e-01 2.21e+00 2.24e-01 7.18e-03 3.14e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.01e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
1.80e+00  4.63e-04 1.75e-02 7.52e-02 2.75e-01 2.18e+00 2.14e-01 7.76e-03 3.64e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.10e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
2.00e+00  5.25e-04 1.77e-02 7.92e-02 3.10e-01 2.14e+00 2.05e-01 8.28e-03 4.13e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.19e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
2.20e+00  5.87e-04 1.79e-02 8.32e-02 3.45e-01 2.11e+00 1.97e-01 8.75e-03 4.63e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.27e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
2.40e+00  6.49e-04 1.81e-02 8.71e-02 3.79e-01 2.08e+00 1.89e-01 9.19e-03 5.12e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.34e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
2.60e+00  7.11e-04 1.83e-02 9.09e-02 4.14e-01 2.05e+00 1.82e-01 9.59e-03 5.61e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.40e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
2.80e+00  7.71e-04 1.85e-02 9.46e-02 4.47e-01 2.02e+00 1.76e-01 9.95e-03 6.09e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.46e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
3.00e+00  8.32e-04 1.86e-02 9.81e-02 4.81e-01 1.99e+00 1.70e-01 1.03e-02 6.57e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.52e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
3.20e+00  8.91e-04 1.87e-02 1.02e-01 5.14e-01 1.96e+00 1.64e-01 1.06e-02 7.04e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.57e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
3.40e+00  9.50e-04 1.88e-02 1.05e-01 5.47e-01 1.94e+00 1.59e-01 1.09e-02 7.51e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.61e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
3.60e+00  1.01e-03 1.89e-02 1.08e-01 5.79e-01 1.91e+00 1.54e-01 1.12e-02 7.97e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.66e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
3.80e+00  1.07e-03 1.89e-02 1.12e-01 6.11e-01 1.88e+00 1.50e-01 1.14e-02 8.42e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.70e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
4.00e+00  1.12e-03 1.90e-02 1.15e-01 6.42e-01 1.86e+00 1.46e-01 1.16e-02 8.87e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.73e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
4.20e+00  1.18e-03 1.90e-02 1.18e-01 6.73e-01 1.83e+00 1.42e-01 1.18e-02 9.31e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.77e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
4.40e+00  1.23e-03 1.91e-02 1.21e-01 7.03e-01 1.81e+00 1.39e-01 1.20e-02 9.75e-06 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.80e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
4.60e+00  1.29e-03 1.91e-02 1.23e-01 7.33e-01 1.78e+00 1.35e-01 1.22e-02 1.02e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.83e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
4.80e+00  1.34e-03 1.91e-02 1.26e-01 7.62e-01 1.76e+00 1.32e-01 1.24e-02 1.06e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.86e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
5.00e+00  1.39e-03 1.91e-02 1.29e-01 7.91e-01 1.74e+00 1.29e-01 1.26e-02 1.10e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.89e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
5.20e+00  1.44e-03 1.91e-02 1.31e-01 8.19e-01 1.72e+00 1.27e-01 1.27e-02 1.14e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.92e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
5.40e+00  1.49e-03 1.91e-02 1.34e-01 8.47e-01 1.69e+00 1.24e-01 1.29e-02 1.18e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.94e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
5.60e+00  1.54e-03 1.91e-02 1.36e-01 8.74e-01 1.67e+00 1.22e-01 1.30e-02 1.22e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.96e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
5.80e+00  1.59e-03 1.91e-02 1.38e-01 9.01e-01 1.65e+00 1.19e-01 1.31e-02 1.26e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 1.98e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
6.00e+00  1.64e-03 1.91e-02 1.41e-01 9.27e-01 1.63e+00 1.17e-01 1.33e-02 1.30e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.00e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
6.20e+00  1.68e-03 1.91e-02 1.43e-01 9.53e-01 1.61e+00 1.15e-01 1.34e-02 1.33e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.02e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
6.40e+00  1.73e-03 1.91e-02 1.45e-01 9.78e-01 1.59e+00 1.13e-01 1.35e-02 1.37e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.04e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
6.60e+00  1.77e-03 1.91e-02 1.47e-01 1.00e+00 1.57e+00 1.11e-01 1.36e-02 1.40e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.06e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
6.80e+00  1.82e-03 1.90e-02 1.49e-01 1.03e+00 1.55e+00 1.10e-01 1.37e-02 1.44e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.08e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
7.00e+00  1.86e-03 1.90e-02 1.51e-01 1.05e+00 1.54e+00 1.08e-01 1.38e-02 1.47e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.09e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
7.20e+00  1.90e-03 1.90e-02 1.52e-01 1.07e+00 1.52e+00 1.06e-01 1.39e-02 1.51e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.11e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
7.40e+00  1.94e-03 1.90e-02 1.54e-01 1.10e+00 1.50e+00 1.05e-01 1.39e-02 1.54e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.12e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
7.60e+00  1.98e-03 1.90e-02 1.56e-01 1.12e+00 1.48e+00 1.04e-01 1.40e-02 1.57e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.13e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
7.80e+00  2.02e-03 1.89e-02 1.57e-01 1.14e+00 1.47e+00 1.02e-01 1.41e-02 1.60e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.15e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
8.00e+00  2.06e-03 1.89e-02 1.59e-01 1.16e+00 1.45e+00 1.01e-01 1.42e-02 1.63e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.16e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
8.20e+00  2.10e-03 1.89e-02 1.60e-01 1.18e+00 1.43e+00 9.97e-02 1.42e-02 1.66e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.17e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
8.40e+00  2.14e-03 1.88e-02 1.62e-01 1.20e+00 1.42e+00 9.85e-02 1.43e-02 1.69e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.18e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
8.60e+00  2.17e-03 1.88e-02 1.63e-01 1.22e+00 1.40e+00 9.74e-02 1.44e-02 1.72e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.19e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
8.80e+00  2.21e-03 1.88e-02 1.65e-01 1.24e+00 1.39e+00 9.63e-02 1.44e-02 1.75e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.20e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
9.00e+00  2.24e-03 1.88e-02 1.66e-01 1.26e+00 1.37e+00 9.53e-02 1.45e-02 1.78e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.21e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
9.20e+00  2.28e-03 1.87e-02 1.67e-01 1.28e+00 1.36e+00 9.43e-02 1.45e-02 1.81e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.22e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
9.40e+00  2.31e-03 1.87e-02 1.68e-01 1.30e+00 1.35e+00 9.34e-02 1.46e-02 1.83e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.23e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
9.60e+00  2.34e-03 1.87e-02 1.70e-01 1.32e+00 1.33e+00 9.25e-02 1.46e-02 1.86e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.24e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02
...
1.00e+01  2.41e-03 1.86e-02 1.72e-01 1.35e+00 1.31e+00 9.08e-02 1.47e-02 1.91e-05 2.00e+00 7.00e-01 2.26e-01 1.60e+00 5.00e+02

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 7/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_13)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 14
## Thoughts
I have performed an experiment with perturbed initial concentrations of `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg`. Now I have two datasets: the original observation (iteration_0) and the new perturbation data (iteration_13).

Let's analyze the new data and compare it to the original data. This will help confirm the reaction dependencies and potentially refine the rate constants and stoichiometry.

Initial concentrations in iteration_13:
`id_uqzr`: 2.5 (vs 5 in iteration_0)
`id_ageg`: 0.35 (vs 0.7 in iteration_0)

Final concentrations in iteration_13 (at t=10):
`id_uqzr`: 1.31 (started at 2.5) -> consumed ~1.19
`id_ageg`: 0.0908 (started at 0.35) -> consumed ~0.2592

Compare to iteration_0 (started at 5 and 0.7):
`id_uqzr`: 2.592793 (consumed ~2.407)
`id_ageg`: 0.105439 (consumed ~0.594)

When initial `id_uqzr` was halved (5 -> 2.5), the amount consumed over 10 seconds was also roughly halved (~2.407 -> ~1.19). This supports a reaction rate that is roughly proportional to `id_uqzr` concentration, consistent with first-order kinetics (Rate = k * [id_uqzr]).

When initial `id_ageg` was halved (0.7 -> 0.35), the amount consumed over 10 seconds was also roughly halved (~0.594 -> ~0.2592). This supports a reaction rate that is roughly proportional to `id_ageg` concentration, consistent with first-order kinetics (Rate = k * [id_ageg]).

This gives me more confidence in the first-order mass action kinetics for the consumption of `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg`.

Now let's look at the products in iteration_13:
Final concentrations in iteration_13 (at t=10):
`id_j3mt`: 1.35
`id_o2wu`: 0.226
`id_udn6`: 0.00241
`id_ml0z`: 0.0186
`id_aprv`: 0.172
`id_nh4a`: 0.0147
`id_hdof`: 0.0000191

Compare to iteration_0 (at t=10):
`id_j3mt`: 2.688295
`id_o2wu`: 0.520000
`id_udn6`: 0.004794
`id_ml0z`: 0.040759
`id_aprv`: 0.320706
`id_nh4a`: 0.033802
`id_hdof`: 0.000038

When initial `id_uqzr` was halved, the production of its hypothesized products (`id_j3mt`, `id_udn6`, `id_hdof`) was also roughly halved:
Δ`id_j3mt`: 1.35 vs 2.69 (ratio ~0.5)
Δ`id_udn6`: 0.00241 vs 0.00479 (ratio ~0.5)
Δ`id_hdof`: 0.0000191 vs 0.000038 (ratio ~0.5)
This supports these products coming from `id_uqzr` and the stoichiometry being consistent.

When initial `id_ageg` was halved, the production of its hypothesized products (`id_o2wu`, `id_ml0z`, `id_aprv`, `id_nh4a`) was also roughly halved:
Δ`id_o2wu`: 0.226 vs 0.520 (ratio ~0.43) - This ratio is a bit off from 0.5.
Δ`id_ml0z`: 0.0186 vs 0.0408 (ratio ~0.45)
Δ`id_aprv`: 0.172 vs 0.321 (ratio ~0.53)
Δ`id_nh4a`: 0.0147 vs 0.0338 (ratio ~0.43)
The ratios for `id_ageg` products are closer to 0.5, but `id_o2wu` is a bit lower. This might suggest the stoichiometry of `id_o2wu` is slightly less than 1 relative to `id_ageg` consumption, or the rate constant k2 is slightly off, or the first-order assumption isn't perfect for this reaction.

Let's re-estimate the stoichiometry based on the changes in iteration_13, relative to the main products.
Reaction 1 (`id_uqzr` -> `id_j3mt` + `id_udn6` + `id_hdof`):
Δ`id_uqzr` ≈ -1.19
Δ`id_j3mt` ≈ +1.35
Δ`id_udn6` ≈ +0.00241
Δ`id_hdof` ≈ +0.0000191

Stoichiometry of `id_j3mt` = Δ`id_j3mt` / |Δ`id_uqzr`| ≈ 1.35 / 1.19 ≈ 1.13 (closer to 1 than before)
Stoichiometry of `id_udn6` = Δ`id_udn6` / |Δ`id_uqzr`| ≈ 0.00241 / 1.19 ≈ 0.0020
Stoichiometry of `id_hdof` = Δ`id_hdof` / |Δ`id_uqzr`| ≈ 0.0000191 / 1.19 ≈ 0.000016

Reaction 2 (`id_ageg` -> `id_o2wu` + `id_ml0z` + `id_aprv` + `id_nh4a`):
Δ`id_ageg` ≈ -0.2592
Δ`id_o2wu` ≈ +0.226
Δ`id_ml0z` ≈ +0.0186
Δ`id_aprv` ≈ +0.172
Δ`id_nh4a` ≈ +0.0147

Stoichiometry of `id_o2wu` = Δ`id_o2wu` / |Δ`id_ageg`| ≈ 0.226 / 0.2592 ≈ 0.87 (consistent with previous estimate)
Stoichiometry of `id_ml0z` = Δ`id_ml0z` / |Δ`id_ageg`| ≈ 0.0186 / 0.2592 ≈ 0.0717 (consistent)
Stoichiometry of `id_aprv` = Δ`id_aprv` / |Δ`id_ageg`| ≈ 0.172 / 0.2592 ≈ 0.663 (consistent)
Stoichiometry of `id_nh4a` = Δ`id_nh4a` / |Δ`id_ageg`| ≈ 0.0147 / 0.2592 ≈ 0.0567 (consistent)

The stoichiometry estimates are relatively consistent between the two experiments. Let's use the values from iteration_13 as they are based on a different initial condition, which is good for robustness.
Reaction 1: `id_uqzr` -> 1.13 `id_j3mt` + 0.0020 `id_udn6` + 0.000016 `id_hdof`
Reaction 2: `id_ageg` -> 0.87 `id_o2wu` + 0.0717 `id_ml0z` + 0.663 `id_aprv` + 0.0567 `id_nh4a`

Let's re-estimate the rate constants using the final concentrations from iteration_13.
For `id_uqzr`: K_uqzr = k1 + k3 ≈ -ln(1.31 / 2.5) / 10 ≈ -ln(0.524) / 10 ≈ -(-0.646) / 10 ≈ 0.0646
For `id_ageg`: K_ageg = k2 + k4 ≈ -ln(0.0908 / 0.35) / 10 ≈ -ln(0.2594) / 10 ≈ -(-1.349) / 10 ≈ 0.1349

Using the new stoichiometry ratios for splitting K_uqzr and K_ageg:
k1 / (k1+k3) ≈ 1.13 / (1.13 + 0.0020 + 0.000016) ≈ 1.13 / 1.132 ≈ 0.998
k3 / (k1+k3) ≈ (0.0020 + 0.000016) / 1.132 ≈ 0.002016 / 1.132 ≈ 0.00178

k1 ≈ 0.998 * K_uqzr ≈ 0.998 * 0.0646 ≈ 0.0645
k3 ≈ 0.00178 * K_uqzr ≈ 0.00178 * 0.0646 ≈ 0.000115

k2 / (k2+k4) ≈ 0.87 / (0.87 + 0.0717 + 0.663 + 0.0567) ≈ 0.87 / 1.6614 ≈ 0.5236
k4 / (k2+k4) ≈ (0.0717 + 0.663 + 0.0567) / 1.6614 ≈ 0.7914 / 1.6614 ≈ 0.4764

k2 ≈ 0.5236 * K_ageg ≈ 0.5236 * 0.1349 ≈ 0.0709
k4 ≈ 0.4764 * K_ageg ≈ 0.4764 * 0.1349 ≈ 0.0643

New parameters: k1=0.0645, k2=0.0709, k3=0.000115, k4=0.0643.
New stoichiometry:
Reaction 1a: `id_uqzr` -> 1.13 `id_j3mt` (Rate k1 * [id_uqzr])
Reaction 1b: `id_uqzr` -> 0.0020 `id_udn6` + 0.000016 `id_hdof` (Rate k3 * [id_uqzr])
Reaction 2a: `id_ageg` -> 0.87 `id_o2wu` (Rate k2 * [id_ageg])
Reaction 2b: `id_ageg` -> 0.0717 `id_ml0z` + 0.663 `id_aprv` + 0.0567 `id_nh4a` (Rate k4 * [id_ageg])

Let's update the model with these new parameters and stoichiometry and simulate the original experiment (iteration_0) to see how well it fits.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0645, "k2": 0.0709, "k3": 0.000115, "k4": 0.0643}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)

# Update stoichiometry in existing reactions
reaction1a = model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
if reaction1a:
    # Assuming only one product id_j3mt
    for prod in reaction1a.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_j3mt":
            prod.setStoichiometry(1.13) # Updated stoichiometry
            break

reaction1b = model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof")
if reaction1b:
     for prod in reaction1b.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_udn6":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.0020) # Updated stoichiometry
        elif prod.getSpecies() == "id_hdof":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.000016) # Updated stoichiometry

reaction2a = model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
if reaction2a:
    # Assuming only one product id_o2wu
    for prod in reaction2a.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_o2wu":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.87) # Updated stoichiometry
            break

reaction2b = model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a")
if reaction2b:
    for prod in reaction2b.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_ml0z":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.0717) # Updated stoichiometry
        elif prod.getSpecies() == "id_aprv":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.663) # Updated stoichiometry
        elif prod.getSpecies() == "id_nh4a":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.0567) # Updated stoichiometry


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model using the original initial conditions
# Need to reset initial concentrations in the model for simulation
sbml_doc_sim = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(updated_sbml)
model_sim = sbml_doc_sim.getModel()

# Reset initial concentrations to iteration_0 values
exp0_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_0'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp0_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim = writer_sim.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim)

sim_data = simulate(sbml_string_sim)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0645, "k2": 0.0709, "k3": 0.000115, "k4": 0.0643}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)

# Update stoichiometry in existing reactions
reaction1a = model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
if reaction1a:
    # Assuming only one product id_j3mt
    for prod in reaction1a.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_j3mt":
            prod.setStoichiometry(1.13) # Updated stoichiometry
            break

reaction1b = model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof")
if reaction1b:
     for prod in reaction1b.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_udn6":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.0020) # Updated stoichiometry
        elif prod.getSpecies() == "id_hdof":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.000016) # Updated stoichiometry

reaction2a = model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
if reaction2a:
    # Assuming only one product id_o2wu
    for prod in reaction2a.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_o2wu":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.87) # Updated stoichiometry
            break

reaction2b = model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a")
if reaction2b:
    for prod in reaction2b.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_ml0z":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.0717) # Updated stoichiometry
        elif prod.getSpecies() == "id_aprv":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.663) # Updated stoichiometry
        elif prod.getSpecies() == "id_nh4a":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.0567) # Updated stoichiometry


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model using the original initial conditions
# Need to reset initial concentrations in the model for simulation
sbml_doc_sim = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(updated_sbml)
model_sim = sbml_doc_sim.getModel()

# Reset initial concentrations to iteration_0 values
exp0_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_0'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp0_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim = writer_sim.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim)

sim_data = simulate(sbml_string_sim)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            2.592793    -1.132039e-48
id_ageg            0.105439     0.000000e+00
id_j3mt            2.688295     8.459916e+00
id_o2wu            0.520000     3.193646e-01
id_udn6            0.004794     1.779772e-05
id_ml0z            0.040759     2.386995e-02
id_aprv            0.320706     2.207221e-01
id_nh4a            0.033802     1.887624e-02
id_hdof            0.000038     1.423818e-07

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 6/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_13)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 15
## Thoughts
The simulation results with the updated parameters and stoichiometry are still not matching the experimental data well. The reactants `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are still consumed too quickly. The final concentrations of products are also off.

Let's look at the final concentrations again:
Experimental (iteration_0):
`id_uqzr`: 2.592793
`id_ageg`: 0.105439
`id_j3mt`: 2.688295
`id_o2wu`: 0.520000
`id_udn6`: 0.004794
`id_ml0z`: 0.040759
`id_aprv`: 0.320706
`id_nh4a`: 0.033802
`id_hdof`: 0.000038

Simulated (iteration_0 initial conditions):
`id_uqzr`: ~0
`id_ageg`: ~0
`id_j3mt`: 8.459916
`id_o2wu`: 0.3193646
`id_udn6`: 1.779772e-05
`id_ml0z`: 0.02386995
`id_aprv`: 0.2207221
`id_nh4a`: 0.01887624
`id_hdof`: 1.423818e-07

The simulation still consumes almost all of `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg`. This means the total consumption rates (k1+k3 and k2+k4) are still too high.

Let's try reducing the rates again.
Current: k1=0.0645, k3=0.000115 (sum=0.064615), k2=0.0709, k4=0.0643 (sum=0.1352)

For `id_uqzr`, the simulation consumed ~5, experiment consumed ~2.407. Need to reduce rate by factor ~0.48.
New k1 + k3 ≈ 0.064615 * 0.48 ≈ 0.031
Let's keep the ratio k1/k3: k1 ≈ 0.0645 / 0.064615 * 0.031 ≈ 0.0309, k3 ≈ 0.000115 / 0.064615 * 0.031 ≈ 0.000055.
So, k1 = 0.0309, k3 = 0.000055.

For `id_ageg`, the simulation consumed ~0.7, experiment consumed ~0.594. Need to reduce rate by factor ~0.85.
New k2 + k4 ≈ 0.1352 * 0.85 ≈ 0.115
Let's keep the ratio k2/k4: k2 ≈ 0.0709 / 0.1352 * 0.115 ≈ 0.0603, k4 ≈ 0.0643 / 0.1352 * 0.115 ≈ 0.0547.
So, k2 = 0.0603, k4 = 0.0547.

New parameters: k1=0.0309, k2=0.0603, k3=0.000055, k4=0.0547.
Stoichiometry remains the same.

Let's update the model and simulate again.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0309, "k2": 0.0603, "k3": 0.000055, "k4": 0.0547}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model using the original initial conditions
# Need to reset initial concentrations in the model for simulation
sbml_doc_sim = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(updated_sbml)
model_sim = sbml_doc_sim.getModel()

# Reset initial concentrations to iteration_0 values
exp0_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_0'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp0_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim = writer_sim.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim)

sim_data = simulate(sbml_string_sim)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")


sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0309, "k2": 0.0603, "k3": 0.000055, "k4": 0.0547}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model using the original initial conditions
# Need to reset initial concentrations in the model for simulation
sbml_doc_sim = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(updated_sbml)
model_sim = sbml_doc_sim.getModel()

# Reset initial concentrations to iteration_0 values
exp0_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_0'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp0_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim = writer_sim.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim)

sim_data = simulate(sbml_string_sim)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            2.592793     3.510308e-49
id_ageg            0.105439    -3.679955e-89
id_j3mt            2.688295     8.459942e+00
id_o2wu            0.520000     3.193278e-01
id_udn6            0.004794     1.776773e-05
id_ml0z            0.040759     2.387298e-02
id_aprv            0.320706     2.207502e-01
id_nh4a            0.033802     1.887863e-02
id_hdof            0.000038     1.421418e-07

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 5/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_13)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 16
## Thoughts
The simulation is still consuming the reactants too quickly. The final concentrations of `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are still close to zero in the simulation, while they are significantly higher in the experiment. This indicates the overall consumption rates (k1+k3 and k2+k4) are still too high.

My manual parameter tuning based on the final concentrations is not working well. The exponential decay assumption for estimating K might be too simplistic if the rates are not purely first-order or if there are other factors influencing the reaction rates.

Let's try to use the data from both experiments to get a better estimate of the rate constants. I can try to minimize the error between the simulated and experimental data for both experiments simultaneously. Since I cannot use optimization libraries, I will try to refine the rate constants based on the discrepancy in both experiments.

Let's look at the consumption over 10 seconds in both experiments:
Exp 0: `id_uqzr` consumed ~2.407 (from 5), `id_ageg` consumed ~0.594 (from 0.7)
Exp 13: `id_uqzr` consumed ~1.19 (from 2.5), `id_ageg` consumed ~0.2592 (from 0.35)

Current simulation (with k1=0.0309, k3=0.000055, k2=0.0603, k4=0.0547):
Exp 0 sim: `id_uqzr` consumed ~5, `id_ageg` consumed ~0.7
Exp 13 sim: Need to simulate Exp 13 with the current parameters to see the consumption.

Let's simulate Exp 13 with the current model first.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")

sbml_doc_sim_exp13 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model_sim_exp13 = sbml_doc_sim_exp13.getModel()

# Set initial concentrations to iteration_13 values
exp13_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_13'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp13_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim_exp13.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim_exp13 = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim_exp13 = writer_sim_exp_13.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim_exp13)

sim_data_exp13 = simulate(sbml_string_sim_exp13)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically) for Exp 13
exp_data_exp13 = experiment_history['iteration_13']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 13:")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df_exp13 = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data_exp13[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data_exp13[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df_exp13)

# Simulate Exp 0 again with current parameters for comparison
sbml_string_exp0 = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis") # Use the same model string
sbml_doc_sim_exp0 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string_exp0)
model_sim_exp0 = sbml_doc_sim_exp0.getModel()

# Reset initial concentrations to iteration_0 values
exp0_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_0'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp0_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim_exp0.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim_exp0 = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim_exp0 = writer_sim_exp0.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim_exp0)

sim_data_exp0 = simulate(sbml_string_sim_exp0)

print("\nComparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 0:")
comparison_df_exp0 = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': experiment_history['iteration_0'][species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data_exp0[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df_exp0)

# Store the updated SBML (parameters were updated in the previous step)
# shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml) # Already done in previous step

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")

# Simulate Exp 13 with the current model
sbml_doc_sim_exp13 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model_sim_exp13 = sbml_doc_sim_exp13.getModel()

# Set initial concentrations to iteration_13 values
exp13_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_13'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp13_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim_exp13.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim_exp13 = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim_exp13 = writer_sim_exp13.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim_exp13) # Corrected variable name

sim_data_exp13 = simulate(sbml_string_sim_exp13)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically) for Exp 13
exp_data_exp13 = experiment_history['iteration_13']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 13:")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df_exp13 = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data_exp13[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data_exp13[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df_exp13)

# Simulate Exp 0 again with current parameters for comparison
sbml_string_exp0 = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis") # Use the same model string
sbml_doc_sim_exp0 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string_exp0)
model_sim_exp0 = sbml_doc_sim_exp0.getModel()

# Reset initial concentrations to iteration_0 values
exp0_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_0'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp0_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim_exp0.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim_exp0 = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim_exp0 = writer_sim_exp0.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim_exp0)

sim_data_exp0 = simulate(sbml_string_sim_exp0)

print("\nComparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 0:")
comparison_df_exp0 = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': experiment_history['iteration_0'][species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data_exp0[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df_exp0)

# Store the updated SBML (parameters were updated in the previous step)
# shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml) # Already done in previous step

```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 name 'writer_sim_exp_13' is not defined

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 4/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_13)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 17
## Thoughts
My apologies, I made a typo in the variable name (`writer_sim_exp_13` instead of `writer_sim_exp13`). I need to fix this and re-run the simulation comparison for both experiments.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")

# Simulate Exp 13 with the current model
sbml_doc_sim_exp13 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model_sim_exp13 = sbml_doc_sim_exp13.getModel()

# Set initial concentrations to iteration_13 values
exp13_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_13'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp13_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim_exp13.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim_exp13 = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim_exp13 = writer_sim_exp13.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim_exp13) # Corrected variable name

sim_data_exp13 = simulate(sbml_string_sim_exp13)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically) for Exp 13
exp_data_exp13 = experiment_history['iteration_13']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 13:")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df_exp13 = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data_exp13[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data_exp13[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df_exp13)

# Simulate Exp 0 again with current parameters for comparison
sbml_string_exp0 = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis") # Use the same model string
sbml_doc_sim_exp0 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string_exp0)
model_sim_exp0 = sbml_doc_sim_exp0.getModel()

# Reset initial concentrations to iteration_0 values
exp0_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_0'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp0_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim_exp0.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim_exp0 = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim_exp0 = writer_sim_exp0.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim_exp0)

sim_data_exp0 = simulate(sbml_string_sim_exp0)

print("\nComparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 0:")
comparison_df_exp0 = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': experiment_history['iteration_0'][species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data_exp0[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df_exp0)

# Store the updated SBML (parameters were updated in the previous step)
# shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml) # Already done in previous step

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")

# Simulate Exp 13 with the current model
sbml_doc_sim_exp13 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model_sim_exp13 = sbml_doc_sim_exp13.getModel()

# Set initial concentrations to iteration_13 values
exp13_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_13'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp13_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim_exp13.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim_exp13 = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim_exp13 = writer_sim_exp13.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim_exp13) # Corrected variable name

sim_data_exp13 = simulate(sbml_string_sim_exp13)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically) for Exp 13
exp_data_exp13 = experiment_history['iteration_13']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 13:")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df_exp13 = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data_exp13[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data_exp13[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df_exp13)

# Simulate Exp 0 again with current parameters for comparison
sbml_string_exp0 = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis") # Use the same model string
sbml_doc_sim_exp0 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string_exp0)
model_sim_exp0 = sbml_doc_sim_exp0.getModel()

# Reset initial concentrations to iteration_0 values
exp0_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_0'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp0_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim_exp0.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim_exp0 = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim_exp0 = writer_sim_exp0.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim_exp0)

sim_data_exp0 = simulate(sbml_string_sim_exp0)

print("\nComparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 0:")
comparison_df_exp0 = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': experiment_history['iteration_0'][species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data_exp0[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df_exp0)

# Store the updated SBML (parameters were updated in the previous step)
# shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml) # Already done in previous step

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 13:
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            1.307167    -6.190986e-49
id_ageg            0.090776     8.754600e-82
id_j3mt            1.354643     4.229971e+00
id_o2wu            0.225886     1.596639e-01
id_udn6            0.002409     8.883864e-06
id_ml0z            0.018596     1.193649e-02
id_aprv            0.171742     1.103751e-01
id_nh4a            0.014742     9.439317e-03
id_hdof            0.000019     7.107091e-08

Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 0:
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            2.592793     3.510308e-49
id_ageg            0.105439    -3.679955e-89
id_j3mt            2.688295     8.459942e+00
id_o2wu            0.520000     3.193278e-01
id_udn6            0.004794     1.776773e-05
id_ml0z            0.040759     2.387298e-02
id_aprv            0.320706     2.207502e-01
id_nh4a            0.033802     1.887863e-02
id_hdof            0.000038     1.421418e-07

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 3/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_13)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 18
## Thoughts
The simulation results for both experiments show that the reactants `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are still consumed too quickly. The final concentrations are close to zero in the simulation, while they are significantly higher in the experiments. This confirms the overall consumption rates (k1+k3 and k2+k4) are still too high.

Let's look at the consumption again:
Exp 0: `id_uqzr` consumed ~2.407 (from 5), `id_ageg` consumed ~0.594 (from 0.7)
Exp 13: `id_uqzr` consumed ~1.19 (from 2.5), `id_ageg` consumed ~0.2592 (from 0.35)

Current simulation (k1=0.0309, k3=0.000055, k2=0.0603, k4=0.0547):
Exp 0 sim: `id_uqzr` consumed ~5, `id_ageg` consumed ~0.7
Exp 13 sim: `id_uqzr` consumed ~2.5, `id_ageg` consumed ~0.35

The simulation is still consuming almost all of the reactants in both cases. This means the rate constants are still too high.

Let's try reducing the total consumption rates (k1+k3) and (k2+k4) again, aiming to match the experimental consumption amounts.

From the exponential decay approximation in Iteration 12:
K_uqzr = k1 + k3 ≈ 0.0656
K_ageg = k2 + k4 ≈ 0.1893

Let's use these values as the target sums for the rate constants.
k1 + k3 = 0.0656
k2 + k4 = 0.1893

Let's keep the ratios of k1/k3 and k2/k4 based on the stoichiometry from Iteration 14:
k1 / k3 ≈ 0.998 / 0.00178 ≈ 560
k2 / k4 ≈ 0.5236 / 0.4764 ≈ 1.1

k1 = 560 * k3
560*k3 + k3 = 0.0656 => 561*k3 = 0.0656 => k3 ≈ 0.000117
k1 ≈ 560 * 0.000117 ≈ 0.0655

k2 = 1.1 * k4
1.1*k4 + k4 = 0.1893 => 2.1*k4 = 0.1893 => k4 ≈ 0.0901
k2 ≈ 1.1 * 0.0901 ≈ 0.0991

New parameters: k1=0.0655, k2=0.0991, k3=0.000117, k4=0.0901.
Stoichiometry remains the same as estimated in Iteration 14:
Reaction 1: `id_uqzr` -> 1.13 `id_j3mt` + 0.0020 `id_udn6` + 0.000016 `id_hdof`
Reaction 2: `id_ageg` -> 0.87 `id_o2wu` + 0.0717 `id_ml0z` + 0.663 `id_aprv` + 0.0567 `id_nh4a`

Let's update the model with these new parameters and simulate both experiments again.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")

sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0655, "k2": 0.0991, "k3": 0.000117, "k4": 0.0901}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)

# Stoichiometry should already be updated from Iteration 14, no need to change structure again.

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate Exp 0 with the updated model
sbml_doc_sim_exp0 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(updated_sbml)
model_sim_exp0 = sbml_doc_sim_exp0.getModel()
exp0_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_0'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp0_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim_exp0.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)
writer_sim_exp0 = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim_exp0 = writer_sim_exp0.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim_exp0)
sim_data_exp0 = simulate(sbml_string_sim_exp0)

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 0:")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']
comparison_df_exp0 = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': experiment_history['iteration_0'][species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data_exp0[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df_exp0)


# Simulate Exp 13 with the updated model
sbml_doc_sim_exp13 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(updated_sbml)
model_sim_exp13 = sbml_doc_sim_exp13.getModel()
exp13_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_13'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp13_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim_exp13.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)
writer_sim_exp13 = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim_exp13 = writer_sim_exp13.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim_exp13)
sim_data_exp13 = simulate(sbml_string_sim_exp13)

print("\nComparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 13:")
comparison_df_exp13 = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': experiment_history['iteration_13'][species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data_exp13[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df_exp13)


# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")

sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0655, "k2": 0.0991, "k3": 0.000117, "k4": 0.0901}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)

# Stoichiometry should already be updated from Iteration 14, no need to change structure again.

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate Exp 0 with the updated model
sbml_doc_sim_exp0 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(updated_sbml)
model_sim_exp0 = sbml_doc_sim_exp0.getModel()
exp0_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_0'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp0_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim_exp0.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)
writer_sim_exp0 = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim_exp0 = writer_sim_exp0.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim_exp0)
sim_data_exp0 = simulate(sbml_string_sim_exp0)

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 0:")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']
comparison_df_exp0 = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': experiment_history['iteration_0'][species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data_exp0[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df_exp0)


# Simulate Exp 13 with the updated model
sbml_doc_sim_exp13 = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(updated_sbml)
model_sim_exp13 = sbml_doc_sim_exp13.getModel()
exp13_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_13'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp13_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim_exp13.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)
writer_sim_exp13 = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim_exp13 = writer_sim_exp13.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim_exp13)
sim_data_exp13 = simulate(sbml_string_sim_exp13)

print("\nComparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 13:")
comparison_df_exp13 = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': experiment_history['iteration_13'][species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data_exp13[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df_exp13)


# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 0:
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            2.592793     6.284037e-46
id_ageg            0.105439     0.000000e+00
id_j3mt            2.688295     8.459888e+00
id_o2wu            0.520000     3.189847e-01
id_udn6            0.004794     1.783075e-05
id_ml0z            0.040759     2.390126e-02
id_aprv            0.320706     2.210117e-01
id_nh4a            0.033802     1.890100e-02
id_hdof            0.000038     1.426460e-07

Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated) for Experiment 13:
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            1.307167    -1.670629e-52
id_ageg            0.090776     2.105744e-82
id_j3mt            1.354643     4.229944e+00
id_o2wu            0.225886     1.594923e-01
id_udn6            0.002409     8.915373e-06
id_ml0z            0.018596     1.195063e-02
id_aprv            0.171742     1.105058e-01
id_nh4a            0.014742     9.450499e-03
id_hdof            0.000019     7.132298e-08

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 2/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_13)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 19
## Thoughts
The simulation results for both experiments still show that the reactants `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are consumed too quickly. The final concentrations are close to zero in the simulation, while they are significantly higher in the experiments. This indicates the overall consumption rates (k1+k3 and k2+k4) are still too high.

My manual parameter tuning based on the final concentrations and exponential decay approximation is not yielding a good fit. The discrepancy in reactant consumption is persistent.

Let's look at the product concentrations again.
Exp 0: `id_j3mt` (2.69), `id_o2wu` (0.52)
Sim 0: `id_j3mt` (8.46), `id_o2wu` (0.319)

Exp 13: `id_j3mt` (1.35), `id_o2wu` (0.226)
Sim 13: `id_j3mt` (4.23), `id_o2wu` (0.159)

The simulated production of `id_j3mt` is consistently much higher than experimental, while `id_o2wu` is lower. This is despite the stoichiometry being set to 1.13 for `id_j3mt` and 0.87 for `id_o2wu`.

This suggests either:
1. The stoichiometry is still wrong.
2. The rate law is not simple mass action (first-order).
3. There are other reactions consuming the products or producing the reactants (though the latter seems unlikely given the initial conditions).

Let's re-examine the stoichiometry based on the total amount produced vs consumed in the experiments.
Exp 0:
`id_uqzr` consumed ~2.407. `id_j3mt` produced ~2.69. Ratio 2.69 / 2.407 ≈ 1.117.
`id_ageg` consumed ~0.594. `id_o2wu` produced ~0.520. Ratio 0.520 / 0.594 ≈ 0.875.

Exp 13:
`id_uqzr` consumed ~1.19. `id_j3mt` produced ~1.35. Ratio 1.35 / 1.19 ≈ 1.134.
`id_ageg` consumed ~0.2592. `id_o2wu` produced ~0.226. Ratio 0.226 / 0.2592 ≈ 0.872.

The stoichiometry estimates for the main products are consistent between experiments:
`id_j3mt` produced per `id_uqzr` consumed ≈ 1.12
`id_o2wu` produced per `id_ageg` consumed ≈ 0.87

Let's update the stoichiometry to these values.
Reaction 1a: `id_uqzr` -> 1.12 `id_j3mt`
Reaction 2a: `id_ageg` -> 0.87 `id_o2wu`

The stoichiometry for minor products also seems consistent:
`id_udn6` / `id_uqzr` consumed ≈ 0.00479 / 2.407 ≈ 0.00199 (Exp 0)
`id_udn6` / `id_uqzr` consumed ≈ 0.00241 / 1.19 ≈ 0.00202 (Exp 13) -> Use 0.0020

`id_hdof` / `id_uqzr` consumed ≈ 0.000038 / 2.407 ≈ 0.0000158 (Exp 0)
`id_hdof` / `id_uqzr` consumed ≈ 0.0000191 / 1.19 ≈ 0.0000161 (Exp 13) -> Use 0.000016

`id_ml0z` / `id_ageg` consumed ≈ 0.0408 / 0.594 ≈ 0.0687 (Exp 0)
`id_ml0z` / `id_ageg` consumed ≈ 0.0186 / 0.2592 ≈ 0.0717 (Exp 13) -> Use 0.0717

`id_aprv` / `id_ageg` consumed ≈ 0.321 / 0.594 ≈ 0.540 (Exp 0)
`id_aprv` / `id_ageg` consumed ≈ 0.172 / 0.2592 ≈ 0.663 (Exp 13) -> Use 0.663

`id_nh4a` / `id_ageg` consumed ≈ 0.0338 / 0.594 ≈ 0.0569 (Exp 0)
`id_nh4a` / `id_ageg` consumed ≈ 0.0147 / 0.2592 ≈ 0.0567 (Exp 13) -> Use 0.0567

Updated stoichiometry:
Reaction 1: `id_uqzr` -> 1.12 `id_j3mt` + 0.0020 `id_udn6` + 0.000016 `id_hdof`
Reaction 2: `id_ageg` -> 0.87 `id_o2wu` + 0.0717 `id_ml0z` + 0.663 `id_aprv` + 0.0567 `id_nh4a`

Let's re-estimate the rate constants using the exponential decay approximation with the target final concentrations from Exp 0:
K_uqzr = k1 + k3 ≈ -ln(2.592793 / 5) / 10 ≈ 0.0656
K_ageg = k2 + k4 ≈ -ln(0.105439 / 0.7) / 10 ≈ 0.1893

Using the new stoichiometry ratios for splitting K_uqzr and K_ageg:
k1 / (k1+k3) ≈ 1.12 / (1.12 + 0.0020 + 0.000016) ≈ 1.12 / 1.122 ≈ 0.9982
k3 / (k1+k3) ≈ (0.0020 + 0.000016) / 1.122 ≈ 0.002016 / 1.122 ≈ 0.00179

k1 ≈ 0.9982 * K_uqzr ≈ 0.9982 * 0.0656 ≈ 0.0655
k3 ≈ 0.00179 * K_uqzr ≈ 0.00179 * 0.0656 ≈ 0.000117

k2 / (k2+k4) ≈ 0.87 / (0.87 + 0.0717 + 0.663 + 0.0567) ≈ 0.87 / 1.6614 ≈ 0.5236
k4 / (k2+k4) ≈ (0.0717 + 0.663 + 0.0567) / 1.6614 ≈ 0.7914 / 1.6614 ≈ 0.4764

k2 ≈ 0.5236 * K_ageg ≈ 0.5236 * 0.1893 ≈ 0.0991
k4 ≈ 0.4764 * K_ageg ≈ 0.4764 * 0.1893 ≈ 0.0902

New parameters: k1=0.0655, k2=0.0991, k3=0.000117, k4=0.0902.
New stoichiometry:
Reaction 1a: `id_uqzr` -> 1.12 `id_j3mt` (Rate k1 * [id_uqzr])
Reaction 1b: `id_uqzr` -> 0.0020 `id_udn6` + 0.000016 `id_hdof` (Rate k3 * [id_uqzr])
Reaction 2a: `id_ageg` -> 0.87 `id_o2wu` (Rate k2 * [id_ageg])
Reaction 2b: `id_ageg` -> 0.0717 `id_ml0z` + 0.663 `id_aprv` + 0.0567 `id_nh4a` (Rate k4 * [id_ageg])

Let's update the model with these new parameters and stoichiometry and simulate the original experiment (iteration_0) to see how well it fits.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")

sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0655, "k2": 0.0991, "k3": 0.000117, "k4": 0.0902}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)

# Update stoichiometry in existing reactions
reaction1a = model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
if reaction1a:
    for prod in reaction1a.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_j3mt":
            prod.setStoichiometry(1.12) # Updated stoichiometry
            break

reaction1b = model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof")
if reaction1b:
     for prod in reaction1b.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_udn6":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.0020) # Updated stoichiometry
        elif prod.getSpecies() == "id_hdof":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.000016) # Updated stoichiometry

reaction2a = model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
if reaction2a:
    for prod in reaction2a.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_o2wu":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.87) # Updated stoichiometry
            break

reaction2b = model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a")
if reaction2b:
    for prod in reaction2b.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_ml0z":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.0717) # Updated stoichiometry
        elif prod.getSpecies() == "id_aprv":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.663) # Updated stoichiometry
        elif prod.getSpecies() == "id_nh4a":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.0567) # Updated stoichiometry


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model using the original initial conditions
sbml_doc_sim = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(updated_sbml)
model_sim = sbml_doc_sim.getModel()

# Reset initial concentrations to iteration_0 values
exp0_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_0'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp0_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim = writer_sim.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim)

sim_data = simulate(sbml_string_sim)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")

sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0655, "k2": 0.0991, "k3": 0.000117, "k4": 0.0902}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)

# Update stoichiometry in existing reactions
reaction1a = model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_j3mt")
if reaction1a:
    for prod in reaction1a.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_j3mt":
            prod.setStoichiometry(1.12) # Updated stoichiometry
            break

reaction1b = model.getReaction("reaction_uqzr_to_udn6_hdof")
if reaction1b:
     for prod in reaction1b.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_udn6":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.0020) # Updated stoichiometry
        elif prod.getSpecies() == "id_hdof":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.000016) # Updated stoichiometry

reaction2a = model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_o2wu")
if reaction2a:
    for prod in reaction2a.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_o2wu":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.87) # Updated stoichiometry
            break

reaction2b = model.getReaction("reaction_ageg_to_ml0z_aprv_nh4a")
if reaction2b:
    for prod in reaction2b.getListOfProducts():
        if prod.getSpecies() == "id_ml0z":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.0717) # Updated stoichiometry
        elif prod.getSpecies() == "id_aprv":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.663) # Updated stoichiometry
        elif prod.getSpecies() == "id_nh4a":
            prod.setStoichiometry(0.0567) # Updated stoichiometry


# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model using the original initial conditions
sbml_doc_sim = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(updated_sbml)
model_sim = sbml_doc_sim.getModel()

# Reset initial concentrations to iteration_0 values
exp0_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_0'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp0_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim = writer_sim.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim)

sim_data = simulate(sbml_string_sim)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            2.592793     3.513811e-45
id_ageg            0.105439     0.000000e+00
id_j3mt            2.688295     8.385022e+00
id_o2wu            0.520000     3.188162e-01
id_udn6            0.004794     1.783075e-05
id_ml0z            0.040759     2.391515e-02
id_aprv            0.320706     2.211401e-01
id_nh4a            0.033802     1.891198e-02
id_hdof            0.000038     1.426460e-07

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 1/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_13)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 20
## Thoughts
The simulation results are still not matching the experimental data well. The reactants `id_uqzr` and `id_ageg` are still consumed too quickly. The final concentrations of products are also off.

My manual parameter tuning and stoichiometry estimation based on the available data and simple first-order kinetics are not sufficient to accurately reproduce the experimental results. The persistent discrepancy in reactant consumption and product formation suggests that either:
1. The rate laws are more complex than simple mass action (e.g., Michaelis-Menten kinetics, or dependence on other species).
2. The stoichiometry is slightly different, and my estimation method is not precise enough.
3. There are other missing reactions or regulatory mechanisms.

Given the limited iterations remaining and the difficulty in manually fitting parameters for a potentially more complex model, I will make one final attempt to refine the parameters based on the observed discrepancies and then submit the model.

The simulation consistently overestimates `id_j3mt` production and underestimates `id_o2wu` production, while consuming reactants too fast. This might indicate that the rate constants k1 and k2 are still slightly off, or the stoichiometry of the main products is slightly off.

Let's try to slightly adjust the rate constants again, focusing on reducing reactant consumption and bringing product levels closer.

Current parameters: k1=0.0655, k2=0.0991, k3=0.000117, k4=0.0902.
Current stoichiometry:
Reaction 1: `id_uqzr` -> 1.12 `id_j3mt` + 0.0020 `id_udn6` + 0.000016 `id_hdof`
Reaction 2: `id_ageg` -> 0.87 `id_o2wu` + 0.0717 `id_ml0z` + 0.663 `id_aprv` + 0.0567 `id_nh4a`

Let's try slightly reducing k1+k3 and k2+k4 again.
Current sum k1+k3 ≈ 0.0656. Let's try reducing it by ~10%: New sum ≈ 0.059.
k1 ≈ 0.9982 * 0.059 ≈ 0.0589
k3 ≈ 0.00179 * 0.059 ≈ 0.000105

Current sum k2+k4 ≈ 0.1893. Let's try reducing it by ~5%: New sum ≈ 0.180.
k2 ≈ 0.5236 * 0.180 ≈ 0.0942
k4 ≈ 0.4764 * 0.180 ≈ 0.0858

New parameters: k1=0.0589, k2=0.0942, k3=0.000105, k4=0.0858.
Stoichiometry remains the same.

Let's update the model and simulate the original experiment (iteration_0) one last time.

```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")

sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0589, "k2": 0.0942, "k3": 0.000105, "k4": 0.0858}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)

# Stoichiometry should already be updated from Iteration 14/19, no need to change structure again.

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model using the original initial conditions
sbml_doc_sim = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(updated_sbml)
model_sim = sbml_doc_sim.getModel()

# Reset initial concentrations to iteration_0 values
exp0_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_0'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp0_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim = writer_sim.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim)

sim_data = simulate(sbml_string_sim)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```

## Action

### Code
```python
import libsbml
import pandas as pd

# Load the SBML model from shared_variables
sbml_string = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")
if sbml_string is None:
     # Fallback just in case
    sbml_string = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Using input_sbml_string.")

sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Update parameters
params_to_add_update = {"k1": 0.0589, "k2": 0.0942, "k3": 0.000105, "k4": 0.0858}

for param_id, param_value in params_to_add_update.items():
    param = model.getParameter(param_id)
    if param is not None:
        param.setValue(param_value)
    else:
        param = model.createParameter()
        param.setId(param_id)
        param.setValue(param_value)
        param.setConstant(True)

# Stoichiometry should already be updated from Iteration 14/19, no need to change structure again.

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate the updated model using the original initial conditions
sbml_doc_sim = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(updated_sbml)
model_sim = sbml_doc_sim.getModel()

# Reset initial concentrations to iteration_0 values
exp0_initial_conditions = experiment_history['iteration_0'].iloc[0].drop('Time')
for species_id, initial_conc in exp0_initial_conditions.items():
    species = model_sim.getSpecies(species_id)
    if species is not None and not species.getBoundaryCondition() and not species.getConstant():
         species.setInitialConcentration(initial_conc)

writer_sim = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
sbml_string_sim = writer_sim.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc_sim)

sim_data = simulate(sbml_string_sim)

# Compare simulation results with experimental data (numerically)
exp_data = experiment_history['iteration_0']

print("Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):")
species_to_compare = ['id_uqzr', 'id_ageg', 'id_j3mt', 'id_o2wu', 'id_udn6', 'id_ml0z', 'id_aprv', 'id_nh4a', 'id_hdof']

comparison_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Experimental_Final': exp_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1],
    'Simulated_Final': sim_data[species_to_compare].iloc[-1]
})
print(comparison_df)

# Store the updated SBML for potential future use
shared_variables.add("current_sbml_hypothesis", updated_sbml)

```
# Observation


            You have used up all interactions. Please put your final model as a string variable called `final_sbml` in your code.
            ```python
            final_sbml = ....
            ```
            It is recommended using libsbml to modify `input_sbml_string` rather than write the entire xml on your own.
            ## Code Stdout
Comparison of final concentrations (Experimental vs Simulated):
         Experimental_Final  Simulated_Final
id_uqzr            2.592793    -1.008490e-49
id_ageg            0.105439    -9.466395e-85
id_j3mt            2.688295     8.385052e+00
id_o2wu            0.520000     3.187100e-01
id_udn6            0.004794     1.779510e-05
id_ml0z            0.040759     2.392390e-02
id_aprv            0.320706     2.212210e-01
id_nh4a            0.033802     1.891890e-02
id_hdof            0.000038     1.423608e-07

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 0/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_13)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (current_sbml_hypothesis)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 21
## Thoughts
I have reached the maximum number of iterations. I have developed a model based on the observed data and perturbations, hypothesizing two main degradation reactions with multiple products and first-order kinetics. I have estimated the stoichiometry and rate constants based on the experimental data. Although the model does not perfectly reproduce the experimental results, it represents my best hypothesis given the available data and tools.

I will now submit the final model.

## Action

### Submit
```python
import libsbml

# Retrieve the last updated SBML model from shared_variables
final_sbml = shared_variables.access("current_sbml_hypothesis")

# If for some reason it's not in shared_variables, fall back to the initial model (though this shouldn't happen)
if final_sbml is None:
    final_sbml = input_sbml_string
    print("Warning: current_sbml_hypothesis not found in shared_variables. Submitting initial input_sbml_string.")

# The final_sbml variable is now set and will be submitted.
```
