
                # Interation 0

                ## Task Info
                You are investigating a biological system where all species are observable. Your goal is to discover the missing reactions. You do not need to add new species.


                ## Incomplete SBML Model. You can assess it as input_sbml_string.

                <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<sbml xmlns="http://www.sbml.org/sbml/level2/version4" level="2" version="4">
  <model id="id_b301">
    <listOfUnitDefinitions>
      <unitDefinition id="id_pv52">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="litre" exponent="1" scale="-3" multiplier="1"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
      <unitDefinition id="id_9whl">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="second" exponent="1" scale="0" multiplier="86400"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
      <unitDefinition id="id_l1cp">
        <listOfUnits>
          <unit kind="item" exponent="1" scale="0" multiplier="1"/>
        </listOfUnits>
      </unitDefinition>
    </listOfUnitDefinitions>
    <listOfCompartments>
      <compartment id="id_ag6d" spatialDimensions="3" size="1" constant="true"/>
    </listOfCompartments>
    <listOfSpecies>
      <species id="id_l6et" compartment="id_ag6d" initialConcentration="1000" boundaryCondition="false" constant="false"/>
      <species id="id_ep2m" compartment="id_ag6d" initialConcentration="200" boundaryCondition="false" constant="false"/>
      <species id="id_wnsa" compartment="id_ag6d" initialConcentration="1" boundaryCondition="false" constant="false"/>
      <species id="id_2ary" compartment="id_ag6d" initialConcentration="1" boundaryCondition="false" constant="false"/>
    </listOfSpecies>
  </model>
</sbml>


                ## Max iterations
                20

                Format your response according to the instructions in the system message.
                
## Thoughts

The provided SBML model defines four species (`id_l6et`, `id_ep2m`, `id_wnsa`, `id_2ary`) but does not include any reactions. My goal is to discover the missing reactions/mechanisms. Since all species are observable, I can request time-course data for all of them. The first step should be to observe the system under default conditions to see how the concentrations of these species change over time. This will provide initial clues about the system's dynamics and possible interactions.

## Action

### Experiment

```json
{
    "action": "observe",
    "meta_data": {}
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_0
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_0]

Total size: 1001 rows × 5 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_0] for the full data

Time   id_l6et  id_ep2m  id_wnsa  id_2ary
0  1.00e+03 2.00e+02 1.00e+00 1.00e+00
...
1.60e+01  8.74e+02 5.18e-08 2.50e+00 6.15e-10
...
3.20e+01  7.36e+02 1.18e+01 8.01e+00 1.09e-01
...
4.80e+01  7.75e+02 6.95e-07 1.62e+00 8.36e-09
...
6.40e+01  6.44e+02 1.55e-01 6.21e+00 1.52e-03
...
8.00e+01  6.97e+02 4.67e-06 1.25e+00 5.63e-08
...
9.60e+01  5.71e+02 3.15e-01 5.38e+00 3.13e-03
...
1.12e+02  6.34e+02 2.31e-05 1.09e+00 2.77e-07
...
1.28e+02  5.15e+02 2.09e+00 4.85e+00 2.10e-02
...
1.44e+02  5.87e+02 1.57e-04 9.79e-01 1.87e-06
...
1.60e+02  4.77e+02 4.34e+00 4.23e+00 4.44e-02
...
1.76e+02  5.54e+02 1.90e-03 8.55e-01 2.26e-05
...
1.92e+02  4.55e+02 1.21e+00 3.40e+00 1.27e-02
...
2.08e+02  5.36e+02 4.89e-02 6.87e-01 5.84e-04
...
2.24e+02  4.50e+02 1.30e-01 2.43e+00 1.43e-03
...
2.40e+02  5.31e+02 4.00e+00 4.92e-01 4.81e-02
...
2.56e+02  4.58e+02 5.12e-02 1.53e+00 5.83e-04
...
2.72e+02  4.99e+02 1.33e+03 6.15e-01 1.58e+01
...
2.88e+02  4.78e+02 5.24e-01 8.41e-01 6.16e-03
...
3.04e+02  4.21e+02 3.82e+00 2.02e+00 4.23e-02
...
3.20e+02  4.97e+02 2.95e+02 4.82e-01 3.53e+00
...
3.36e+02  4.61e+02 2.65e+00 8.80e-01 3.10e-02
...
3.52e+02  4.19e+02 7.85e+00 1.70e+00 8.80e-02
...
3.68e+02  4.34e+02 1.31e+03 1.20e+00 1.51e+01
...
3.84e+02  4.68e+02 5.34e+01 6.45e-01 6.31e-01
...
4.00e+02  4.40e+02 1.03e+01 1.03e+00 1.19e-01
...
4.16e+02  4.14e+02 2.91e+01 1.56e+00 3.28e-01
...
4.32e+02  4.06e+02 5.21e+02 1.72e+00 5.83e+00
...
4.48e+02  4.52e+02 5.05e+02 7.56e-01 5.93e+00
...
4.64e+02  4.51e+02 9.96e+01 7.59e-01 1.17e+00
...
4.80e+02  4.37e+02 4.27e+01 9.69e-01 4.95e-01
...
4.96e+02  4.22e+02 4.67e+01 1.23e+00 5.34e-01
...
5.12e+02  4.11e+02 1.10e+02 1.47e+00 1.25e+00
...
5.28e+02  4.10e+02 3.45e+02 1.49e+00 3.90e+00
...
5.44e+02  4.24e+02 5.67e+02 1.15e+00 6.52e+00
...
5.60e+02  4.38e+02 3.90e+02 9.04e-01 4.54e+00
...
5.76e+02  4.40e+02 2.11e+02 8.74e-01 2.46e+00
...
5.92e+02  4.35e+02 1.31e+02 9.42e-01 1.53e+00
...
6.08e+02  4.29e+02 1.06e+02 1.05e+00 1.22e+00
...
6.24e+02  4.23e+02 1.11e+02 1.16e+00 1.28e+00
...
6.40e+02  4.18e+02 1.45e+02 1.26e+00 1.66e+00
...
6.56e+02  4.16e+02 2.12e+02 1.31e+00 2.42e+00
...
6.72e+02  4.17e+02 3.01e+02 1.28e+00 3.43e+00
...
6.88e+02  4.21e+02 3.60e+02 1.18e+00 4.13e+00
...
7.04e+02  4.26e+02 3.51e+02 1.08e+00 4.04e+00
...
7.20e+02  4.30e+02 2.96e+02 1.02e+00 3.42e+00
...
7.36e+02  4.30e+02 2.38e+02 1.01e+00 2.75e+00
...
7.52e+02  4.29e+02 1.98e+02 1.03e+00 2.29e+00
...
7.68e+02  4.27e+02 1.77e+02 1.07e+00 2.04e+00
...
8.00e+02  4.22e+02 1.84e+02 1.16e+00 2.11e+00

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 20/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 1
## Thoughts

From the observation experiment, we see that the concentrations of the four species (`id_l6et`, `id_ep2m`, `id_wnsa`, `id_2ary`) change dynamically over time, indicating that there are reactions connecting them. Notably:
- `id_l6et` decreases over time, suggesting it is a reactant in one or more reactions.
- `id_ep2m` shows oscillatory or burst-like behavior, with sharp increases and decreases.
- `id_wnsa` and `id_2ary` also show dynamic, possibly oscillatory, changes.

The sharp, periodic increases in `id_ep2m` and `id_2ary` suggest a possible autocatalytic or feedback mechanism, or a system with nonlinear dynamics (e.g., substrate inhibition, activation, or a cycle).

To further probe the system, I should perturb the initial concentrations of one or more species and observe the system's response. This will help distinguish between direct and indirect interactions and clarify the network structure.

A logical next step is to increase the initial concentration of `id_ep2m` (since it shows strong dynamic changes) and observe how the other species respond. This can help reveal whether `id_ep2m` acts as a catalyst, product, or regulator.

## Action

### Experiment

```json
{
    "action": "change_initial_concentration",
    "meta_data": {
        "id_ep2m": 1000
    }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_1
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_1]

Total size: 1001 rows × 5 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_1] for the full data

Time   id_l6et  id_ep2m  id_wnsa  id_2ary
0  1.00e+03 1.00e+03 1.00e+00 1.00e+00
...
1.60e+01  8.77e+02 8.20e-08 2.42e+00 9.76e-10
...
3.20e+01  7.39e+02 1.71e+00 7.66e+00 1.61e-02
...
4.80e+01  7.78e+02 1.40e-06 1.55e+00 1.69e-08
...
6.40e+01  6.48e+02 2.33e-02 5.85e+00 2.31e-04
...
8.00e+01  7.00e+02 1.06e-05 1.18e+00 1.27e-07
...
9.60e+01  5.76e+02 3.99e-02 5.01e+00 4.04e-04
...
1.12e+02  6.38e+02 5.31e-05 1.01e+00 6.38e-07
...
1.28e+02  5.21e+02 2.25e-01 4.47e+00 2.30e-03
...
1.44e+02  5.92e+02 3.53e-04 9.02e-01 4.23e-06
...
1.60e+02  4.83e+02 5.01e-01 3.87e+00 5.21e-03
...
1.76e+02  5.59e+02 4.36e-03 7.82e-01 5.21e-05
...
1.92e+02  4.62e+02 2.16e-01 3.09e+00 2.31e-03
...
2.08e+02  5.41e+02 1.24e-01 6.24e-01 1.49e-03
...
2.24e+02  4.56e+02 4.90e-02 2.20e+00 5.43e-04
...
2.40e+02  5.36e+02 1.21e+01 4.48e-01 1.46e-01
...
2.56e+02  4.64e+02 4.41e-02 1.38e+00 5.06e-04
...
2.72e+02  4.52e+02 2.13e+03 1.39e+00 2.44e+01
...
2.88e+02  4.84e+02 9.29e-01 7.59e-01 1.10e-02
...
3.04e+02  4.27e+02 1.74e+00 1.82e+00 1.94e-02
...
3.20e+02  4.88e+02 7.45e+02 5.61e-01 8.87e+00
...
3.36e+02  4.66e+02 4.19e+00 7.93e-01 4.92e-02
...
3.52e+02  4.25e+02 4.74e+00 1.53e+00 5.36e-02
...
3.68e+02  4.10e+02 9.02e+02 1.82e+00 1.01e+01
...
3.84e+02  4.72e+02 1.07e+02 6.03e-01 1.27e+00
...
4.00e+02  4.46e+02 1.28e+01 9.30e-01 1.49e-01
...
4.16e+02  4.20e+02 1.95e+01 1.42e+00 2.21e-01
...
4.32e+02  4.03e+02 2.49e+02 1.81e+00 2.77e+00
...
4.48e+02  4.41e+02 7.55e+02 9.16e-01 8.78e+00
...
4.64e+02  4.54e+02 1.64e+02 7.26e-01 1.93e+00
...
4.80e+02  4.42e+02 5.48e+01 8.92e-01 6.38e-01
...
4.96e+02  4.27e+02 4.39e+01 1.13e+00 5.05e-01
...
5.12e+02  4.15e+02 7.74e+01 1.38e+00 8.79e-01
...
5.28e+02  4.09e+02 2.21e+02 1.51e+00 2.49e+00
...
5.44e+02  4.16e+02 5.03e+02 1.31e+00 5.73e+00
...
5.60e+02  4.32e+02 4.88e+02 9.96e-01 5.65e+00
...
5.76e+02  4.39e+02 2.87e+02 8.82e-01 3.34e+00
...
5.92e+02  4.37e+02 1.68e+02 9.08e-01 1.95e+00
...
6.08e+02  4.32e+02 1.20e+02 9.93e-01 1.39e+00
...
6.24e+02  4.26e+02 1.10e+02 1.10e+00 1.27e+00
...
6.40e+02  4.21e+02 1.27e+02 1.21e+00 1.45e+00
...
6.56e+02  4.17e+02 1.72e+02 1.28e+00 1.97e+00
...
6.72e+02  4.16e+02 2.47e+02 1.29e+00 2.82e+00
...
6.88e+02  4.19e+02 3.25e+02 1.24e+00 3.72e+00
...
7.04e+02  4.23e+02 3.57e+02 1.14e+00 4.10e+00
...
7.20e+02  4.28e+02 3.28e+02 1.06e+00 3.78e+00
...
7.36e+02  4.30e+02 2.72e+02 1.02e+00 3.15e+00
...
7.52e+02  4.30e+02 2.23e+02 1.02e+00 2.58e+00
...
7.68e+02  4.28e+02 1.91e+02 1.04e+00 2.21e+00
...
8.00e+02  4.24e+02 1.78e+02 1.13e+00 2.05e+00

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 19/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 2
## Thoughts

The perturbation experiment with high initial `id_ep2m` shows:
- `id_ep2m` rapidly drops to near zero, then exhibits sharp, periodic spikes, similar to the default case but with higher amplitude and frequency.
- `id_l6et` decreases over time, but not as rapidly as `id_ep2m`.
- `id_wnsa` and `id_2ary` show oscillatory increases, with peaks that seem to follow the spikes in `id_ep2m`.

This suggests:
- `id_ep2m` is likely produced in bursts and rapidly consumed, possibly as an intermediate.
- The oscillatory behavior and sharp spikes suggest a feedback loop or autocatalytic process, possibly involving `id_2ary` or `id_wnsa`.
- The system may have a cycle or a set of coupled reactions, possibly with nonlinear kinetics.

To further probe the network, I should perturb another species. Since `id_l6et` is the most abundant and decreases steadily, it may be the main substrate. Increasing its initial concentration could reveal whether it is the source for the other species and how the system's dynamics scale with substrate availability.

## Action

### Experiment

```json
{
    "action": "change_initial_concentration",
    "meta_data": {
        "id_l6et": 2000
    }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment error
We were not able to run the experiment with your set experiment actions.
Please scrutinize your protocol and make sure that the experiment you request is sensical.

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 18/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 3
## Thoughts

The experiment to increase `id_l6et` failed. This suggests that `id_l6et` may be a boundary or constant species, or there is a restriction on changing its initial concentration. The other species (`id_ep2m`, `id_wnsa`, `id_2ary`) are likely not boundary/constant, as we were able to change `id_ep2m` previously.

Given this, I should try perturbing the initial concentration of another non-boundary, non-constant species. Since `id_wnsa` and `id_2ary` both show oscillatory behavior, increasing the initial concentration of `id_wnsa` could help reveal its role in the network and its relationship to the other species.

## Action

### Experiment

```json
{
    "action": "change_initial_concentration",
    "meta_data": {
        "id_wnsa": 100
    }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment Result
Experiment ID: iteration_3
Your requested experiment has finished. The details results are saved as a dataframe in experiment_history[iteration_3]

Total size: 1001 rows × 5 columns. 

Below shows a subset of the table for your convenience. You should access experiment_history[iteration_3] for the full data

Time   id_l6et   id_ep2m  id_wnsa  id_2ary
0  1.00e+03  2.00e+02 1.00e+02 1.00e+00
...
1.60e+01  1.00e+03 -6.38e-11 2.04e+01 3.30e-15
...
3.20e+01  1.00e+03  1.78e-08 4.11e+00 2.05e-10
...
4.80e+01  9.72e+02  1.15e+03 1.34e+00 1.45e+01
...
6.40e+01  8.71e+02  3.04e-08 2.29e+00 3.63e-10
...
8.00e+01  7.29e+02  3.58e+00 7.94e+00 3.32e-02
...
9.60e+01  7.69e+02  2.17e-07 1.60e+00 2.61e-09
...
1.12e+02  6.33e+02  1.30e+00 6.68e+00 1.24e-02
...
1.28e+02  6.87e+02  7.30e-07 1.35e+00 8.74e-09
...
1.44e+02  5.56e+02  5.21e+01 6.23e+00 4.98e-01
...
1.60e+02  6.21e+02  2.58e-06 1.27e+00 3.06e-08
...
1.76e+02  5.22e+02  2.40e+03 3.89e+00 2.54e+01
...
1.92e+02  5.71e+02  1.66e-05 1.23e+00 1.96e-07
...
2.08e+02  5.34e+02  3.28e+03 1.43e+00 3.82e+01
...
2.24e+02  5.35e+02  1.84e-04 1.14e+00 2.16e-06
...
2.40e+02  4.65e+02  2.50e+03 2.63e+00 2.74e+01
...
2.56e+02  5.15e+02  3.05e-03 9.61e-01 3.59e-05
...
2.72e+02  4.25e+02  5.43e+01 3.49e+00 5.66e-01
...
2.88e+02  5.09e+02  1.05e-01 7.13e-01 1.25e-03
...
3.04e+02  4.32e+02  5.59e-01 2.27e+00 6.14e-03
...
3.20e+02  5.16e+02  1.68e+01 4.64e-01 2.02e-01
...
3.36e+02  4.53e+02  1.73e-01 1.28e+00 1.99e-03
...
3.52e+02  4.07e+02  8.78e+02 2.40e+00 9.56e+00
...
3.68e+02  4.82e+02  7.24e+00 6.31e-01 8.59e-02
...
3.84e+02  4.34e+02  1.57e+00 1.36e+00 1.80e-02
...
4.00e+02  4.01e+02  5.22e+02 2.19e+00 5.72e+00
...
4.16e+02  4.77e+02  8.20e+01 5.71e-01 9.73e-01
...
4.32e+02  4.45e+02  7.06e+00 9.69e-01 8.20e-02
...
4.48e+02  4.14e+02  1.98e+01 1.58e+00 2.23e-01
...
4.64e+02  4.07e+02  6.91e+02 1.70e+00 7.74e+00
...
4.80e+02  4.60e+02  3.22e+02 6.65e-01 3.80e+00
...
4.96e+02  4.49e+02  5.06e+01 7.96e-01 5.93e-01
...
5.12e+02  4.31e+02  2.82e+01 1.08e+00 3.25e-01
...
5.28e+02  4.14e+02  5.47e+01 1.42e+00 6.20e-01
...
5.44e+02  4.06e+02  2.43e+02 1.61e+00 2.73e+00
...
5.60e+02  4.21e+02  6.46e+02 1.22e+00 7.40e+00
...
5.76e+02  4.41e+02  4.11e+02 8.56e-01 4.80e+00
...
5.92e+02  4.42e+02  1.80e+02 8.34e-01 2.10e+00
...
6.08e+02  4.36e+02  1.02e+02 9.35e-01 1.18e+00
...
6.24e+02  4.28e+02  8.38e+01 1.08e+00 9.66e-01
...
6.40e+02  4.20e+02  9.95e+01 1.22e+00 1.14e+00
...
6.56e+02  4.15e+02  1.54e+02 1.33e+00 1.76e+00
...
6.72e+02  4.14e+02  2.61e+02 1.35e+00 2.97e+00
...
6.88e+02  4.18e+02  3.78e+02 1.25e+00 4.32e+00
...
7.04e+02  4.25e+02  4.01e+02 1.10e+00 4.62e+00
...
7.20e+02  4.31e+02  3.31e+02 1.00e+00 3.83e+00
...
7.36e+02  4.32e+02  2.48e+02 9.74e-01 2.88e+00
...
7.52e+02  4.31e+02  1.92e+02 9.96e-01 2.22e+00
...
7.68e+02  4.28e+02  1.63e+02 1.05e+00 1.89e+00
...
8.00e+02  4.22e+02  1.68e+02 1.16e+00 1.92e+00

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 17/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 4
## Thoughts

The experiment with high initial `id_wnsa` (100) reveals:
- `id_l6et` remains at 1000 for a while, then starts to decrease, similar to previous experiments.
- `id_ep2m` is near zero for a while, then shows sharp, high-amplitude spikes, sometimes reaching values in the thousands, before returning to near zero.
- `id_wnsa` rapidly drops from 100 to lower values, then oscillates at lower concentrations.
- `id_2ary` remains low, with occasional sharp increases that seem to follow the spikes in `id_ep2m`.

This further supports the idea of a cyclic or feedback-driven system, possibly with autocatalytic or burst-generating reactions. The fact that `id_ep2m` can reach very high concentrations after a lag suggests it is produced in a highly nonlinear fashion, possibly from `id_l6et` and/or `id_wnsa`, and then rapidly consumed.

To clarify the role of `id_2ary`, I will now increase its initial concentration and observe the system's response. This will help determine if it acts as a product, intermediate, or regulator in the network.

## Action

### Experiment

```json
{
    "action": "change_initial_concentration",
    "meta_data": {
        "id_2ary": 100
    }
}
```
# Observation

## Experiment error
We were not able to run the experiment with your set experiment actions.
Please scrutinize your protocol and make sure that the experiment you request is sensical.

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 16/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 5
## Thoughts

The experiment to increase `id_2ary` failed, suggesting that `id_2ary` is likely a boundary or constant species, similar to `id_l6et`. This means only `id_ep2m` and `id_wnsa` are freely perturbable, and both show strong, nonlinear, oscillatory dynamics.

From the experiments so far:
- `id_l6et` is a substrate that decreases over time.
- `id_ep2m` is an intermediate or product that spikes and is rapidly consumed.
- `id_wnsa` is also an intermediate, showing oscillatory behavior.
- `id_2ary` is likely a product or boundary species, with sharp increases following `id_ep2m` spikes.

The system likely involves a cycle or feedback loop, possibly with autocatalytic or burst-generating reactions. To proceed, I should analyze the time-series data quantitatively to infer possible reaction mechanisms and relationships between the species.

## Action

### Code

```python
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Load the default experiment data
df = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Plot all species to visualize their dynamics
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
for col in ['id_l6et', 'id_ep2m', 'id_wnsa', 'id_2ary']:
    plt.plot(df['Time'], df[col], label=col)
plt.xlabel('Time')
plt.ylabel('Concentration')
plt.legend()
plt.title('Time-course of all species (default conditions)')
plt.show()

# Calculate and print correlation matrix to see relationships
corr = df[['id_l6et', 'id_ep2m', 'id_wnsa', 'id_2ary']].corr()
print("Correlation matrix:\n", corr)

# Print a few timepoints where id_ep2m spikes to see what happens to other species
spike_indices = df['id_ep2m'].nlargest(5).index
print("Timepoints with highest id_ep2m spikes:")
print(df.loc[spike_indices, ['Time', 'id_l6et', 'id_ep2m', 'id_wnsa', 'id_2ary']])
```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 Unauthorized modules matplotlib detected. Only these modules are allowed: numpy, pandas, libsbml, math, scipy, jax, sklearn, io, traceback.

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 15/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 6
## Thoughts

I mistakenly used `matplotlib`, which is not allowed. I will instead focus on numerical analysis using the allowed libraries. I will:
- Calculate the correlation matrix to see relationships between species.
- Identify timepoints where `id_ep2m` spikes and examine the concentrations of other species at those times.
- Look for patterns in the time-series data that might suggest reaction mechanisms (e.g., delays, synchrony, or anti-correlation).

This analysis should help hypothesize the network structure and possible reaction types.

## Action

### Code

```python
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# Load the default experiment data
df = experiment_history['iteration_0']

# Calculate and print correlation matrix to see relationships
corr = df[['id_l6et', 'id_ep2m', 'id_wnsa', 'id_2ary']].corr()
print("Correlation matrix:\n", corr)

# Find timepoints where id_ep2m spikes (top 5 values)
spike_indices = df['id_ep2m'].nlargest(5).index
print("Timepoints with highest id_ep2m spikes:")
print(df.loc[spike_indices, ['Time', 'id_l6et', 'id_ep2m', 'id_wnsa', 'id_2ary']])

# Examine the time lag between spikes in id_ep2m and id_2ary
ep2m_spike_times = df.loc[spike_indices, 'Time'].values
id_2ary_at_spikes = df.loc[spike_indices, 'id_2ary'].values
print("id_2ary at id_ep2m spike times:", id_2ary_at_spikes)

# Check for negative values or anomalies
print("Any negative concentrations?\n", (df[['id_l6et', 'id_ep2m', 'id_wnsa', 'id_2ary']] < 0).any())
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
Correlation matrix:
           id_l6et   id_ep2m   id_wnsa   id_2ary
id_l6et  1.000000 -0.090412  0.343979 -0.086644
id_ep2m -0.090412  1.000000 -0.035102  0.998875
id_wnsa  0.343979 -0.035102  1.000000 -0.049022
id_2ary -0.086644  0.998875 -0.049022  1.000000
Timepoints with highest id_ep2m spikes:
      Time     id_l6et      id_ep2m   id_wnsa    id_2ary
116   92.8  652.525590  3017.860024  1.422321  35.964554
157  125.6  541.066058  2873.689759  3.220396  31.371925
38    30.4  802.603523  2865.610596  2.782931  33.512155
235  188.0  516.572693  2863.418054  1.204082  33.514131
196  156.8  567.069005  2627.322048  0.918055  31.359894
id_2ary at id_ep2m spike times: [35.96455449 31.37192499 33.51215496 33.51413054 31.35989351]
Any negative concentrations?
 id_l6et    False
id_ep2m    False
id_wnsa    False
id_2ary    False
dtype: bool

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 14/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 7
## Thoughts

Key findings from the analysis:
- `id_ep2m` and `id_2ary` are extremely highly correlated (correlation ≈ 0.999), suggesting that `id_2ary` is either directly produced from `id_ep2m` or they are tightly coupled in a reaction.
- `id_l6et` is weakly anti-correlated with `id_ep2m` and `id_2ary`, and moderately positively correlated with `id_wnsa`.
- `id_wnsa` is only weakly correlated with the other species.
- At the timepoints where `id_ep2m` spikes, `id_2ary` is also high, supporting the idea that `id_2ary` is produced from `id_ep2m` (possibly in a 1:1 or proportional fashion).
- No negative concentrations, so the data is clean.

Hypothesis:
- `id_l6et` is a substrate that is slowly consumed.
- `id_ep2m` is an intermediate that is produced in bursts from `id_l6et` (possibly via a nonlinear or autocatalytic process).
- `id_2ary` is produced from `id_ep2m`.
- `id_wnsa` may be involved in modulating the bursts or is a side product/intermediate.

Next, I will check the time-series for `id_wnsa` at the same spike times to see if it lags or leads the spikes, which could clarify its role. I will also look at the changes in `id_l6et` at those times.

## Action

### Code

```python
# Use the same spike indices as before
df = experiment_history['iteration_0']
spike_indices = df['id_ep2m'].nlargest(5).index

# Print id_wnsa and id_l6et at the spike times
print("id_wnsa and id_l6et at id_ep2m spike times:")
print(df.loc[spike_indices, ['Time', 'id_wnsa', 'id_l6et']])

# Check the change in id_l6et and id_wnsa just before and after the spike
for idx in spike_indices:
    before = max(0, idx-1)
    after = min(len(df)-1, idx+1)
    print(f"\nTime {df.loc[idx, 'Time']}:")
    print(f"  Before spike: id_l6et={df.loc[before, 'id_l6et']}, id_wnsa={df.loc[before, 'id_wnsa']}")
    print(f"  At spike:     id_l6et={df.loc[idx, 'id_l6et']}, id_wnsa={df.loc[idx, 'id_wnsa']}")
    print(f"  After spike:  id_l6et={df.loc[after, 'id_l6et']}, id_wnsa={df.loc[after, 'id_wnsa']}")
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
id_wnsa and id_l6et at id_ep2m spike times:
      Time   id_wnsa     id_l6et
116   92.8  1.422321  652.525590
157  125.6  3.220396  541.066058
38    30.4  2.782931  802.603523
235  188.0  1.204082  516.572693
196  156.8  0.918055  567.069005

Time 92.80000000000001:
  Before spike: id_l6et=709.6282182515956, id_wnsa=0.5468867447240484
  At spike:     id_l6et=652.5255902459116, id_wnsa=1.4223210109937534
  After spike:  id_l6et=575.2118191832374, id_wnsa=5.2968785663497355

Time 125.60000000000001:
  Before spike: id_l6et=619.4908608006982, id_wnsa=0.8434939166341289
  At spike:     id_l6et=541.0660582355947, id_wnsa=3.2203955788679632
  After spike:  id_l6et=510.65200984646776, id_wnsa=5.379747312280137

Time 30.400000000000002:
  Before spike: id_l6et=871.8164361688048, id_wnsa=0.8870005745369776
  At spike:     id_l6et=802.6035226830639, id_wnsa=2.78293146968917
  After spike:  id_l6et=738.3638250138529, id_wnsa=8.070023866318309

Time 188.0:
  Before spike: id_l6et=566.6901213644201, id_wnsa=0.5124638689140295
  At spike:     id_l6et=516.5726925992003, id_wnsa=1.2040824881101353
  After spike:  id_l6et=460.4667619090612, id_wnsa=3.160917273359457

Time 156.8:
  Before spike: id_l6et=610.8295278642547, id_wnsa=0.43922808550785647
  At spike:     id_l6et=567.0690048430679, id_wnsa=0.918054959585437
  After spike:  id_l6et=497.3054913275053, id_wnsa=3.0364902358448025

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 13/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. ()

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 8
## Thoughts

From the time-series analysis at `id_ep2m` spike times:
- `id_l6et` drops sharply at the spike, indicating it is being rapidly consumed during the burst of `id_ep2m` production.
- `id_wnsa` increases at the spike and continues to rise after, suggesting it is produced as a result of the same reaction or a subsequent one.
- The pattern is consistent across all major spikes: a drop in `id_l6et`, a spike in `id_ep2m`, and a rise in `id_wnsa`.

This supports a reaction mechanism where:
1. `id_l6et` is converted to `id_ep2m` (possibly nonlinearly or autocatalytically, given the bursty nature).
2. `id_ep2m` is rapidly converted to `id_2ary` (and possibly also to `id_wnsa`).
3. `id_wnsa` may be a side product or involved in feedback.

Given the strong correlation between `id_ep2m` and `id_2ary`, and the bursty, oscillatory nature, a minimal model could be:
- `id_l6et` → `id_ep2m`
- `id_ep2m` → `id_2ary` + `id_wnsa`
- Possibly, `id_wnsa` feeds back to promote the conversion of `id_l6et` to `id_ep2m` (autocatalysis or positive feedback).

To test this, I will attempt to build a simple SBML model with these reactions and simulate it to compare with the observed data.

## Action

### Code

```python
import libsbml

# Start with the input SBML string
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Add reaction: id_l6et -> id_ep2m (possibly autocatalytic, but start with simple mass-action)
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("r1")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1 = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1.setSpecies("id_l6et")
reactant1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product1.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product1.setConstant(False)
# Kinetic law for r1
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
p1 = kl1.createParameter()
p1.setId("k1")
p1.setValue(0.01)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_l6et")

# Add reaction: id_ep2m -> id_2ary + id_wnsa
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("r2")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2a = reaction2.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_2ary")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a.setConstant(False)
product2b = reaction2.createProduct()
product2b.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
product2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b.setConstant(False)
# Kinetic law for r2
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
p2 = kl2.createParameter()
p2.setId("k2")
p2.setValue(0.1)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_ep2m")

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare to experiment
simulated = simulate(updated_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml_v1", updated_sbml)
print(simulated.head())
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
       id_l6et     id_ep2m    id_wnsa    id_2ary  Time
0  1000.000000  200.000000   1.000000   1.000000   0.0
1   992.031915  192.280555  16.687530  16.687530   0.8
2   984.127320  185.093611  31.779069  31.779069   1.6
3   976.285710  178.398674  46.315616  46.315616   2.4
4   968.506582  172.158425  60.334993  60.334993   3.2

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 12/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml_v1)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 9
## Thoughts

The simple mass-action model produces smooth, monotonic changes in all species, with no oscillations or bursts. In contrast, the experimental data show sharp, periodic spikes in `id_ep2m` and `id_2ary`, and oscillatory behavior in `id_wnsa`. This suggests that the real system involves nonlinear or feedback mechanisms not captured by the current model.

Given the bursty, oscillatory nature, a likely mechanism is positive feedback or autocatalysis in the production of `id_ep2m` (e.g., `id_wnsa` or `id_ep2m` itself catalyzes the conversion of `id_l6et` to `id_ep2m`). This could be modeled by making the rate of `id_l6et` to `id_ep2m` depend on `id_wnsa` or `id_ep2m` (e.g., `rate = k1 * id_l6et * id_wnsa` or `rate = k1 * id_l6et * id_ep2m`).

I will modify the model to include autocatalysis (`id_l6et + id_ep2m -> 2 id_ep2m`) and see if this produces the observed dynamics.

## Action

### Code

```python
import libsbml

# Load the previous model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions (if any)
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add autocatalytic reaction: id_l6et + id_ep2m -> 2 id_ep2m
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("r1")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1a = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_l6et")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1a.setConstant(False)
reactant1b = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1b.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product1.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product1.setConstant(False)
# Kinetic law for r1
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
p1 = kl1.createParameter()
p1.setId("k1")
p1.setValue(0.0001)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_l6et * id_ep2m")

# Add reaction: id_ep2m -> id_2ary + id_wnsa
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("r2")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2a = reaction2.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_2ary")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a.setConstant(False)
product2b = reaction2.createProduct()
product2b.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
product2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b.setConstant(False)
# Kinetic law for r2
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
p2 = kl2.createParameter()
p2.setId("k2")
p2.setValue(0.1)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_ep2m")

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare to experiment
simulated = simulate(updated_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml_v2", updated_sbml)
print(simulated.head())
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
       id_l6et     id_ep2m    id_wnsa    id_2ary  Time
0  1000.000000  200.000000   1.000000   1.000000   0.0
1   984.130756  199.872654  16.996590  16.996590   0.8
2   968.532806  199.494260  32.972934  32.972934   1.6
3   953.220337  198.870506  48.909157  48.909157   2.4
4   938.205769  198.008332  64.785899  64.785899   3.2

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 11/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml_v1, test_sbml_v2)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 10
## Thoughts

The autocatalytic model (`id_l6et + id_ep2m -> 2 id_ep2m`) still produces smooth, monotonic changes in all species, with no oscillations or bursts. This suggests that simple autocatalysis is not sufficient to reproduce the observed bursty, oscillatory dynamics.

Given the sharp, periodic spikes in the experimental data, a likely mechanism is a delayed negative feedback or an inhibition process, which is a hallmark of relaxation oscillators (e.g., the Lotka-Volterra or Brusselator models). In such systems, the product or an intermediate inhibits its own production after a delay, leading to oscillations.

Since `id_wnsa` rises after the spikes in `id_ep2m`, it may act as an inhibitor of the autocatalytic reaction. I will try a model where `id_wnsa` inhibits the conversion of `id_l6et` to `id_ep2m`, using an inhibition term in the rate law (e.g., `rate = k1 * id_l6et * id_ep2m / (1 + k3 * id_wnsa)`).

## Action

### Code

```python
import libsbml

# Load the previous model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add autocatalytic + inhibited reaction: id_l6et + id_ep2m -> 2 id_ep2m, inhibited by id_wnsa
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("r1")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1a = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_l6et")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1a.setConstant(False)
reactant1b = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1b.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product1.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product1.setConstant(False)
# Kinetic law for r1
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
p1 = kl1.createParameter()
p1.setId("k1")
p1.setValue(0.001)
p3 = kl1.createParameter()
p3.setId("k3")
p3.setValue(0.1)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_l6et * id_ep2m / (1 + k3 * id_wnsa)")

# Add reaction: id_ep2m -> id_2ary + id_wnsa
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("r2")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2a = reaction2.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_2ary")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a.setConstant(False)
product2b = reaction2.createProduct()
product2b.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
product2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b.setConstant(False)
# Kinetic law for r2
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
p2 = kl2.createParameter()
p2.setId("k2")
p2.setValue(0.1)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_ep2m")

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare to experiment
simulated = simulate(updated_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml_v3", updated_sbml)
print(simulated.head())
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
       id_l6et     id_ep2m    id_wnsa    id_2ary  Time
0  1000.000000  200.000000   1.000000   1.000000   0.0
1   902.537629  277.790669  20.671702  20.671702   0.8
2   852.678391  304.180082  44.141527  44.141527   1.6
3   821.237395  310.931162  68.831443  68.831443   2.4
4   799.069483  308.286119  93.644399  93.644399   3.2

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 10/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml_v1, test_sbml_v2, test_sbml_v3)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 11
## Thoughts

The addition of inhibition by `id_wnsa` in the autocatalytic reaction increases the nonlinearity, but the simulated data still shows smooth, monotonic changes in all species, with no oscillations or bursts. This suggests that the current model is still missing a key mechanism responsible for the observed relaxation oscillations and bursts.

Given the experimental data, a plausible mechanism is that `id_wnsa` is not just an inhibitor but is also degraded or removed from the system, allowing the cycle to reset and oscillations to occur. In many classic oscillatory systems (e.g., the Brusselator), a removal or degradation step is essential for oscillations.

I will add a degradation reaction for `id_wnsa` (`id_wnsa -> null`) and see if this produces the desired oscillatory behavior.

## Action

### Code

```python
import libsbml

# Load the previous model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add autocatalytic + inhibited reaction: id_l6et + id_ep2m -> 2 id_ep2m, inhibited by id_wnsa
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("r1")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1a = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_l6et")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1a.setConstant(False)
reactant1b = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1b.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product1.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product1.setConstant(False)
# Kinetic law for r1
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
p1 = kl1.createParameter()
p1.setId("k1")
p1.setValue(0.001)
p3 = kl1.createParameter()
p3.setId("k3")
p3.setValue(0.1)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_l6et * id_ep2m / (1 + k3 * id_wnsa)")

# Add reaction: id_ep2m -> id_2ary + id_wnsa
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("r2")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2a = reaction2.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_2ary")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a.setConstant(False)
product2b = reaction2.createProduct()
product2b.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
product2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b.setConstant(False)
# Kinetic law for r2
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
p2 = kl2.createParameter()
p2.setId("k2")
p2.setValue(0.1)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_ep2m")

# Add degradation reaction: id_wnsa -> null
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("r3")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
# No products (degradation)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
p4 = kl3.createParameter()
p4.setId("k4")
p4.setValue(0.05)
kl3.setFormula("k4 * id_wnsa")

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare to experiment
simulated = simulate(updated_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml_v4", updated_sbml)
print(simulated.head())
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
       id_l6et     id_ep2m    id_wnsa    id_2ary  Time
0  1000.000000  200.000000   1.000000   1.000000   0.0
1   902.038501  278.276745  20.277051  20.684754   0.8
2   851.048416  305.717507  42.573591  44.234078   1.6
3   818.283347  313.623487  65.274752  69.093165   2.4
4   794.741008  312.092414  87.293440  94.166578   3.2

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 9/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml_v1, test_sbml_v2, test_sbml_v3, test_sbml_v4)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 12
## Thoughts

Even after adding degradation of `id_wnsa`, the simulated data still shows smooth, monotonic changes, not the sharp oscillations and bursts seen in the experimental data. This suggests that the current model is still missing a key nonlinear or feedback mechanism.

Given the experimental data, a classic mechanism for generating relaxation oscillations is a positive feedback loop (autocatalysis) combined with a delayed negative feedback (inhibition or depletion). The current model has some of these features, but the inhibition may not be strong or nonlinear enough.

Another approach is to use a more nonlinear inhibition, such as a Hill function for inhibition by `id_wnsa` (e.g., `rate = k1 * id_l6et * id_ep2m / (1 + (k3 * id_wnsa)^n)` with n > 1), which can create sharper transitions and oscillations.

I will modify the inhibition term to use a Hill coefficient of 2 and increase the autocatalytic rate to see if this produces oscillations.

## Action

### Code

```python
import libsbml

# Load the previous model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add autocatalytic + strongly inhibited reaction: id_l6et + id_ep2m -> 2 id_ep2m, Hill inhibition by id_wnsa
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("r1")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1a = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_l6et")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1a.setConstant(False)
reactant1b = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1b.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product1.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product1.setConstant(False)
# Kinetic law for r1
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
p1 = kl1.createParameter()
p1.setId("k1")
p1.setValue(0.01)
p3 = kl1.createParameter()
p3.setId("k3")
p3.setValue(0.01)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_l6et * id_ep2m / (1 + (k3 * id_wnsa)^2)")

# Add reaction: id_ep2m -> id_2ary + id_wnsa
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("r2")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2a = reaction2.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_2ary")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a.setConstant(False)
product2b = reaction2.createProduct()
product2b.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
product2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b.setConstant(False)
# Kinetic law for r2
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
p2 = kl2.createParameter()
p2.setId("k2")
p2.setValue(0.1)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_ep2m")

# Add degradation reaction: id_wnsa -> null
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("r3")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
# No products (degradation)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
p4 = kl3.createParameter()
p4.setId("k4")
p4.setValue(0.05)
kl3.setFormula("k4 * id_wnsa")

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare to experiment
simulated = simulate(updated_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml_v5", updated_sbml)
print(simulated.head())
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
       id_l6et      id_ep2m     id_wnsa     id_2ary  Time
0  1000.000000   200.000000    1.000000    1.000000   0.0
1     1.612555  1123.228484   74.853916   76.158961   0.8
2     0.036261  1038.347659  156.647343  162.616080   1.6
3     0.006470   958.543898  228.742214  242.449632   2.4
4     0.002488   884.851331  291.995919  316.146181   3.2

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 8/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml_v1, test_sbml_v2, test_sbml_v3, test_sbml_v4, test_sbml_v5)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 13
## Thoughts

The new model with strong nonlinear (Hill-type) inhibition by `id_wnsa` and increased autocatalytic rate produces a very rapid depletion of `id_l6et` and a sharp, monotonic increase in `id_ep2m`, `id_wnsa`, and `id_2ary`. However, it still does not produce the oscillatory or bursty behavior seen in the experimental data. Instead, `id_l6et` is almost instantly depleted, and the other species rise quickly and then plateau.

This suggests that the current model is too "explosive" and lacks a mechanism to reset the system or introduce a delay. In classic relaxation oscillators, a slow negative feedback or a slow recovery variable is often present. In the experimental data, `id_ep2m` and `id_2ary` show repeated spikes, not a single burst.

A possible missing mechanism is a slow, constant inflow of `id_l6et` (i.e., a source term), which would allow the system to recover and oscillate. I will add a zero-order inflow reaction for `id_l6et` and adjust the rates to see if this produces oscillations.

## Action

### Code

```python
import libsbml

# Load the previous model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add inflow: null -> id_l6et
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("r0")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_l6et")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(False)
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
p0 = kl0.createParameter()
p0.setId("k0")
p0.setValue(100)
kl0.setFormula("k0")

# Add autocatalytic + strongly inhibited reaction: id_l6et + id_ep2m -> 2 id_ep2m, Hill inhibition by id_wnsa
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("r1")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1a = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_l6et")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1a.setConstant(False)
reactant1b = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1b.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product1.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product1.setConstant(False)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
p1 = kl1.createParameter()
p1.setId("k1")
p1.setValue(0.01)
p3 = kl1.createParameter()
p3.setId("k3")
p3.setValue(0.01)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_l6et * id_ep2m / (1 + (k3 * id_wnsa)^2)")

# Add reaction: id_ep2m -> id_2ary + id_wnsa
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("r2")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2a = reaction2.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_2ary")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a.setConstant(False)
product2b = reaction2.createProduct()
product2b.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
product2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b.setConstant(False)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
p2 = kl2.createParameter()
p2.setId("k2")
p2.setValue(0.1)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_ep2m")

# Add degradation reaction: id_wnsa -> null
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("r3")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
p4 = kl3.createParameter()
p4.setId("k4")
p4.setValue(0.05)
kl3.setFormula("k4 * id_wnsa")

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare to experiment
simulated = simulate(updated_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml_v6", updated_sbml)
print(simulated.head())
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
       id_l6et      id_ep2m     id_wnsa     id_2ary  Time
0  1000.000000   200.000000    1.000000    1.000000   0.0
1    13.351491  1189.022503   77.291147   78.626006   0.8
2    25.447805  1162.777511  166.544081  172.774684   1.6
3    45.723506  1130.740624  249.955598  264.535870   2.4
4    70.801965  1096.561100  327.488326  353.636935   3.2

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 7/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml_v1, test_sbml_v2, test_sbml_v3, test_sbml_v4, test_sbml_v5, test_sbml_v6)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 14
## Thoughts

Adding a constant inflow of `id_l6et` did not produce oscillations; instead, `id_ep2m`, `id_wnsa`, and `id_2ary` rise rapidly, and `id_l6et` drops to a low value and then slowly recovers, but there are still no bursts or oscillations. This suggests that the system is still missing a key delay or feedback mechanism.

Given the experimental data, which shows repeated, sharp spikes in `id_ep2m` and `id_2ary`, a classic mechanism is a delayed negative feedback, often implemented by a slow conversion or degradation step. In the Brusselator model, for example, the autocatalytic intermediate is also degraded or converted in a nonlinear way.

Another possibility is that the conversion of `id_ep2m` to `id_2ary` and `id_wnsa` is itself nonlinear (e.g., a Hill function or cooperative process), or that `id_wnsa` inhibits the inflow of `id_l6et` (not just the autocatalytic step).

I will try making the conversion of `id_ep2m` to `id_2ary` and `id_wnsa` a nonlinear (Hill-type) process, and reduce the inflow rate to avoid explosive growth.

## Action

### Code

```python
import libsbml

# Load the previous model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add inflow: null -> id_l6et (lower rate)
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("r0")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_l6et")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(False)
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
p0 = kl0.createParameter()
p0.setId("k0")
p0.setValue(10)
kl0.setFormula("k0")

# Add autocatalytic + strongly inhibited reaction: id_l6et + id_ep2m -> 2 id_ep2m, Hill inhibition by id_wnsa
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("r1")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1a = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_l6et")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1a.setConstant(False)
reactant1b = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1b.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product1.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product1.setConstant(False)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
p1 = kl1.createParameter()
p1.setId("k1")
p1.setValue(0.01)
p3 = kl1.createParameter()
p3.setId("k3")
p3.setValue(0.01)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_l6et * id_ep2m / (1 + (k3 * id_wnsa)^2)")

# Add nonlinear conversion: id_ep2m -> id_2ary + id_wnsa (Hill coefficient 2)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("r2")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2a = reaction2.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_2ary")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a.setConstant(False)
product2b = reaction2.createProduct()
product2b.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
product2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b.setConstant(False)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
p2 = kl2.createParameter()
p2.setId("k2")
p2.setValue(0.1)
p5 = kl2.createParameter()
p5.setId("k5")
p5.setValue(0.001)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_ep2m^2 / (1 + k5 * id_ep2m^2)")

# Add degradation reaction: id_wnsa -> null
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("r3")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
p4 = kl3.createParameter()
p4.setId("k4")
p4.setValue(0.05)
kl3.setFormula("k4 * id_wnsa")

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare to experiment
simulated = simulate(updated_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml_v7", updated_sbml)
print(simulated.head())
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
       id_l6et      id_ep2m     id_wnsa     id_2ary  Time
0  1000.000000   200.000000    1.000000    1.000000   0.0
1     3.686644  1124.508034   79.193262   80.805322   0.8
2     2.612409  1053.649636  154.443105  160.737955   1.6
3     4.514657   979.824794  226.732511  240.660549   2.4
4     7.033202   905.396317  296.174987  320.570481   3.2

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 6/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml_v1, test_sbml_v2, test_sbml_v3, test_sbml_v4, test_sbml_v5, test_sbml_v6, test_sbml_v7)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 15
## Thoughts

The model with a nonlinear (Hill-type) conversion of `id_ep2m` to `id_2ary` and `id_wnsa`, and a lower inflow of `id_l6et`, still does not produce oscillations or bursts. Instead, `id_ep2m` rises rapidly, and `id_l6et` is depleted almost instantly, with only minor fluctuations. This suggests that the system is still missing a key delay or feedback mechanism.

Given the experimental data, which shows repeated, sharp spikes in `id_ep2m` and `id_2ary`, a plausible mechanism is a slow, constant inflow of `id_ep2m` (not just `id_l6et`). This would allow the system to recover and oscillate, as in the classic Brusselator model, where the intermediate is supplied at a constant rate.

I will add a zero-order inflow for `id_ep2m` and further reduce the inflow of `id_l6et` to see if this produces oscillations.

## Action

### Code

```python
import libsbml

# Load the previous model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add inflow: null -> id_l6et (lower rate)
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("r0")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_l6et")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(False)
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
p0 = kl0.createParameter()
p0.setId("k0")
p0.setValue(1)
kl0.setFormula("k0")

# Add inflow: null -> id_ep2m (small rate)
reaction00 = model.createReaction()
reaction00.setId("r00")
reaction00.setReversible(False)
reaction00.setFast(False)
product00 = reaction00.createProduct()
product00.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product00.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product00.setConstant(False)
kl00 = reaction00.createKineticLaw()
p00 = kl00.createParameter()
p00.setId("k00")
p00.setValue(0.5)
kl00.setFormula("k00")

# Add autocatalytic + strongly inhibited reaction: id_l6et + id_ep2m -> 2 id_ep2m, Hill inhibition by id_wnsa
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("r1")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1a = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_l6et")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1a.setConstant(False)
reactant1b = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1b.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product1.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product1.setConstant(False)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
p1 = kl1.createParameter()
p1.setId("k1")
p1.setValue(0.01)
p3 = kl1.createParameter()
p3.setId("k3")
p3.setValue(0.01)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_l6et * id_ep2m / (1 + (k3 * id_wnsa)^2)")

# Add nonlinear conversion: id_ep2m -> id_2ary + id_wnsa (Hill coefficient 2)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("r2")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2a = reaction2.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_2ary")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a.setConstant(False)
product2b = reaction2.createProduct()
product2b.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
product2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b.setConstant(False)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
p2 = kl2.createParameter()
p2.setId("k2")
p2.setValue(0.1)
p5 = kl2.createParameter()
p5.setId("k5")
p5.setValue(0.001)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_ep2m^2 / (1 + k5 * id_ep2m^2)")

# Add degradation reaction: id_wnsa -> null
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("r3")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
p4 = kl3.createParameter()
p4.setId("k4")
p4.setValue(0.05)
kl3.setFormula("k4 * id_wnsa")

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare to experiment
simulated = simulate(updated_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml_v8", updated_sbml)
print(simulated.head())
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
       id_l6et      id_ep2m     id_wnsa     id_2ary  Time
0  1000.000000   200.000000    1.000000    1.000000   0.0
1     2.558034  1118.836982   79.192929   80.804984   0.8
2     0.314328  1042.349135  154.441724  160.736537   1.6
3     0.464950   963.478090  226.729051  240.656959   2.4
4     0.715890   884.520913  296.168036  320.563198   3.2

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 5/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml_v1, test_sbml_v2, test_sbml_v3, test_sbml_v4, test_sbml_v5, test_sbml_v6, test_sbml_v7, test_sbml_v8)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 16
## Thoughts

Despite adding a small inflow for `id_ep2m` and reducing the inflow for `id_l6et`, the model still does not produce oscillations or bursts. Instead, `id_ep2m` rises rapidly, and `id_l6et` is depleted almost instantly, with only minor fluctuations. The system quickly reaches a high steady state for `id_ep2m`, `id_wnsa`, and `id_2ary`.

The experimental data, however, show repeated, sharp spikes in `id_ep2m` and `id_2ary`, which are characteristic of relaxation oscillators. The current model is missing a mechanism that allows for the periodic recovery and depletion of a key species.

A classic feature of relaxation oscillators (e.g., the Brusselator) is a slow inflow of a substrate and a fast, nonlinear autocatalytic step, with a slow removal or conversion of the product. The key may be to further slow down the inflow of `id_l6et` and/or the degradation of `id_wnsa`, and to increase the nonlinearity of the autocatalytic step.

I will:
- Further reduce the inflow of `id_l6et`.
- Slow down the degradation of `id_wnsa`.
- Increase the nonlinearity (Hill coefficient) in the autocatalytic step.

## Action

### Code

```python
import libsbml

# Load the previous model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add inflow: null -> id_l6et (very low rate)
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("r0")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_l6et")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(False)
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
p0 = kl0.createParameter()
p0.setId("k0")
p0.setValue(0.1)
kl0.setFormula("k0")

# Add inflow: null -> id_ep2m (small rate)
reaction00 = model.createReaction()
reaction00.setId("r00")
reaction00.setReversible(False)
reaction00.setFast(False)
product00 = reaction00.createProduct()
product00.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product00.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product00.setConstant(False)
kl00 = reaction00.createKineticLaw()
p00 = kl00.createParameter()
p00.setId("k00")
p00.setValue(0.5)
kl00.setFormula("k00")

# Add highly nonlinear autocatalytic + inhibited reaction: id_l6et + id_ep2m^3 -> 2 id_ep2m, Hill inhibition by id_wnsa
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("r1")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1a = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_l6et")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1a.setConstant(False)
reactant1b = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1b.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product1.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product1.setConstant(False)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
p1 = kl1.createParameter()
p1.setId("k1")
p1.setValue(0.01)
p3 = kl1.createParameter()
p3.setId("k3")
p3.setValue(0.01)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_l6et * id_ep2m^3 / (1 + (k3 * id_wnsa)^2)")

# Add nonlinear conversion: id_ep2m -> id_2ary + id_wnsa (Hill coefficient 2)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("r2")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2a = reaction2.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_2ary")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a.setConstant(False)
product2b = reaction2.createProduct()
product2b.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
product2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b.setConstant(False)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
p2 = kl2.createParameter()
p2.setId("k2")
p2.setValue(0.1)
p5 = kl2.createParameter()
p5.setId("k5")
p5.setValue(0.001)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_ep2m^2 / (1 + k5 * id_ep2m^2)")

# Add slow degradation reaction: id_wnsa -> null
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("r3")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
p4 = kl3.createParameter()
p4.setId("k4")
p4.setValue(0.005)
kl3.setFormula("k4 * id_wnsa")

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare to experiment
simulated = simulate(updated_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml_v9", updated_sbml)
print(simulated.head())
```
# Observation

## Code Stderror
 We could not run simulations on your SBML model. This is the error: CVODE Error: CV_ERR_FAILURE: Error test failures occurred too many times (= MXNEF = 7) during one internal time step oroccurred with |h| = hmin.; In virtual double rr::CVODEIntegrator::integrate(double, double). Log file contents: Error: CVODE Error: CV_ERR_FAILURE, Module: CVODES, Function: CVode, Message: At t = 6.28897 and h = 1.61839e-05, the error test failed repeatedly or with |h| = hmin.


## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 4/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml_v1, test_sbml_v2, test_sbml_v3, test_sbml_v4, test_sbml_v5, test_sbml_v6, test_sbml_v7, test_sbml_v8)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 17
## Thoughts

The simulation failed due to numerical instability, likely caused by excessive nonlinearity (e.g., the cubic term in `id_ep2m` or very small/large parameter values). This is a common issue in highly nonlinear systems, especially with high Hill coefficients or very slow/fast rates.

To address this:
- I will reduce the nonlinearity (use a Hill coefficient of 2 instead of 3).
- I will slightly increase the degradation rate of `id_wnsa` to prevent runaway accumulation.
- I will keep the inflow of `id_l6et` and `id_ep2m` low to avoid explosive growth.
- I will check and ensure all rate constants are within reasonable ranges.

The goal is to maintain enough nonlinearity to potentially generate oscillations, but not so much that the system becomes numerically unstable.

## Action

### Code

```python
import libsbml

# Load the previous model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add inflow: null -> id_l6et (very low rate)
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("r0")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_l6et")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(False)
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
p0 = kl0.createParameter()
p0.setId("k0")
p0.setValue(0.1)
kl0.setFormula("k0")

# Add inflow: null -> id_ep2m (small rate)
reaction00 = model.createReaction()
reaction00.setId("r00")
reaction00.setReversible(False)
reaction00.setFast(False)
product00 = reaction00.createProduct()
product00.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product00.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product00.setConstant(False)
kl00 = reaction00.createKineticLaw()
p00 = kl00.createParameter()
p00.setId("k00")
p00.setValue(0.5)
kl00.setFormula("k00")

# Add nonlinear autocatalytic + inhibited reaction: id_l6et + id_ep2m^2 -> 2 id_ep2m, Hill inhibition by id_wnsa
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("r1")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1a = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_l6et")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1a.setConstant(False)
reactant1b = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1b.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product1.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product1.setConstant(False)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
p1 = kl1.createParameter()
p1.setId("k1")
p1.setValue(0.005)
p3 = kl1.createParameter()
p3.setId("k3")
p3.setValue(0.01)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_l6et * id_ep2m^2 / (1 + (k3 * id_wnsa)^2)")

# Add nonlinear conversion: id_ep2m -> id_2ary + id_wnsa (Hill coefficient 2)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("r2")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2a = reaction2.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_2ary")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a.setConstant(False)
product2b = reaction2.createProduct()
product2b.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
product2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b.setConstant(False)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
p2 = kl2.createParameter()
p2.setId("k2")
p2.setValue(0.05)
p5 = kl2.createParameter()
p5.setId("k5")
p5.setValue(0.001)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_ep2m^2 / (1 + k5 * id_ep2m^2)")

# Add slow degradation reaction: id_wnsa -> null
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("r3")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
p4 = kl3.createParameter()
p4.setId("k4")
p4.setValue(0.01)
kl3.setFormula("k4 * id_wnsa")

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare to experiment
simulated = simulate(updated_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml_v10", updated_sbml)
print(simulated.head())
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
       id_l6et      id_ep2m     id_wnsa     id_2ary  Time
0  1000.000000   200.000000    1.000000    1.000000   0.0
1     0.000017  1160.509110   40.803466   40.970873   0.8
2     0.000026  1121.019826   80.288182   80.940148   1.6
3     0.000041  1081.532776  119.456028  120.907183   2.4
4     0.000065  1042.048214  158.309296  160.871722   3.2

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 3/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml_v1, test_sbml_v2, test_sbml_v3, test_sbml_v4, test_sbml_v5, test_sbml_v6, test_sbml_v7, test_sbml_v8, test_sbml_v10)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 18
## Thoughts

The model still does not produce oscillations or bursts. Instead, `id_l6et` is depleted almost instantly, and `id_ep2m`, `id_wnsa`, and `id_2ary` rise rapidly and monotonically. This suggests that the autocatalytic step is too strong relative to the inflow, or that the system lacks a true recovery mechanism for `id_l6et`.

Given the experimental data, which shows repeated spikes, the system likely needs:
- A slow, constant inflow of `id_l6et` (to allow recovery between bursts).
- A much weaker autocatalytic step (to prevent instant depletion).
- Possibly, a higher degradation rate for `id_wnsa` to allow the system to reset.

I will:
- Increase the inflow rate of `id_l6et`.
- Decrease the autocatalytic rate constant.
- Increase the degradation rate of `id_wnsa`.

This should allow `id_l6et` to recover between bursts and may produce oscillations.

## Action

### Code

```python
import libsbml

# Load the previous model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add inflow: null -> id_l6et (moderate rate)
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("r0")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_l6et")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(False)
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
p0 = kl0.createParameter()
p0.setId("k0")
p0.setValue(5)
kl0.setFormula("k0")

# Add inflow: null -> id_ep2m (small rate)
reaction00 = model.createReaction()
reaction00.setId("r00")
reaction00.setReversible(False)
reaction00.setFast(False)
product00 = reaction00.createProduct()
product00.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product00.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product00.setConstant(False)
kl00 = reaction00.createKineticLaw()
p00 = kl00.createParameter()
p00.setId("k00")
p00.setValue(0.5)
kl00.setFormula("k00")

# Add nonlinear autocatalytic + inhibited reaction: id_l6et + id_ep2m^2 -> 2 id_ep2m, Hill inhibition by id_wnsa
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("r1")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1a = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_l6et")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1a.setConstant(False)
reactant1b = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1b.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product1.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product1.setConstant(False)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
p1 = kl1.createParameter()
p1.setId("k1")
p1.setValue(0.00001)
p3 = kl1.createParameter()
p3.setId("k3")
p3.setValue(0.01)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_l6et * id_ep2m^2 / (1 + (k3 * id_wnsa)^2)")

# Add nonlinear conversion: id_ep2m -> id_2ary + id_wnsa (Hill coefficient 2)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("r2")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2a = reaction2.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_2ary")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a.setConstant(False)
product2b = reaction2.createProduct()
product2b.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
product2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b.setConstant(False)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
p2 = kl2.createParameter()
p2.setId("k2")
p2.setValue(0.05)
p5 = kl2.createParameter()
p5.setId("k5")
p5.setValue(0.001)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_ep2m^2 / (1 + k5 * id_ep2m^2)")

# Add faster degradation reaction: id_wnsa -> null
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("r3")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
p4 = kl3.createParameter()
p4.setId("k4")
p4.setValue(0.1)
kl3.setFormula("k4 * id_wnsa")

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare to experiment
simulated = simulate(updated_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml_v11", updated_sbml)
print(simulated.head())
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
       id_l6et      id_ep2m     id_wnsa     id_2ary  Time
0  1000.000000   200.000000    1.000000    1.000000   0.0
1    27.418177  1137.243828   39.118576   40.737996   0.8
2     0.588483  1128.504101   74.523428   80.707416   1.6
3     0.833254  1092.691741  107.204459  120.675004   2.4
4     1.170680  1056.788925  137.370739  160.640395   3.2

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 2/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml_v1, test_sbml_v2, test_sbml_v3, test_sbml_v4, test_sbml_v5, test_sbml_v6, test_sbml_v7, test_sbml_v8, test_sbml_v10, test_sbml_v11)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 19
## Thoughts

Despite all the adjustments, the model still does not produce the sharp, repeated oscillations or bursts seen in the experimental data. Instead, `id_l6et` is depleted very quickly, and the other species rise rapidly and then plateau. This suggests that the autocatalytic step is still too strong relative to the inflow, or that the system needs a more pronounced separation of timescales between inflow, autocatalysis, and removal.

Given the time constraints (only 2 iterations left), I will try one last approach:
- Make the inflow of `id_l6et` much higher, so it can recover between bursts.
- Make the autocatalytic step even weaker.
- Make the degradation of `id_wnsa` even faster, to allow the system to reset.
- Remove the inflow of `id_ep2m` (since the experimental system likely does not have this).

This should allow for the possibility of oscillations, as in the classic Brusselator or Oregonator models.

## Action

### Code

```python
import libsbml

# Load the previous model
sbml_doc = libsbml.readSBMLFromString(input_sbml_string)
model = sbml_doc.getModel()

# Remove all existing reactions
while model.getNumReactions() > 0:
    model.removeReaction(0)

# Add inflow: null -> id_l6et (high rate)
reaction0 = model.createReaction()
reaction0.setId("r0")
reaction0.setReversible(False)
reaction0.setFast(False)
product0 = reaction0.createProduct()
product0.setSpecies("id_l6et")
product0.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product0.setConstant(False)
kl0 = reaction0.createKineticLaw()
p0 = kl0.createParameter()
p0.setId("k0")
p0.setValue(50)
kl0.setFormula("k0")

# Add nonlinear autocatalytic + inhibited reaction: id_l6et + id_ep2m^2 -> 2 id_ep2m, Hill inhibition by id_wnsa
reaction1 = model.createReaction()
reaction1.setId("r1")
reaction1.setReversible(False)
reaction1.setFast(False)
reactant1a = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1a.setSpecies("id_l6et")
reactant1a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1a.setConstant(False)
reactant1b = reaction1.createReactant()
reactant1b.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant1b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant1b.setConstant(False)
product1 = reaction1.createProduct()
product1.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
product1.setStoichiometry(2.0)
product1.setConstant(False)
kl1 = reaction1.createKineticLaw()
p1 = kl1.createParameter()
p1.setId("k1")
p1.setValue(0.000001)
p3 = kl1.createParameter()
p3.setId("k3")
p3.setValue(0.01)
kl1.setFormula("k1 * id_l6et * id_ep2m^2 / (1 + (k3 * id_wnsa)^2)")

# Add nonlinear conversion: id_ep2m -> id_2ary + id_wnsa (Hill coefficient 2)
reaction2 = model.createReaction()
reaction2.setId("r2")
reaction2.setReversible(False)
reaction2.setFast(False)
reactant2 = reaction2.createReactant()
reactant2.setSpecies("id_ep2m")
reactant2.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant2.setConstant(False)
product2a = reaction2.createProduct()
product2a.setSpecies("id_2ary")
product2a.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2a.setConstant(False)
product2b = reaction2.createProduct()
product2b.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
product2b.setStoichiometry(1.0)
product2b.setConstant(False)
kl2 = reaction2.createKineticLaw()
p2 = kl2.createParameter()
p2.setId("k2")
p2.setValue(0.05)
p5 = kl2.createParameter()
p5.setId("k5")
p5.setValue(0.001)
kl2.setFormula("k2 * id_ep2m^2 / (1 + k5 * id_ep2m^2)")

# Add very fast degradation reaction: id_wnsa -> null
reaction3 = model.createReaction()
reaction3.setId("r3")
reaction3.setReversible(False)
reaction3.setFast(False)
reactant3 = reaction3.createReactant()
reactant3.setSpecies("id_wnsa")
reactant3.setStoichiometry(1.0)
reactant3.setConstant(False)
kl3 = reaction3.createKineticLaw()
p4 = kl3.createParameter()
p4.setId("k4")
p4.setValue(1.0)
kl3.setFormula("k4 * id_wnsa")

# Write the updated SBML
writer = libsbml.SBMLWriter()
updated_sbml = writer.writeSBMLToString(sbml_doc)

# Simulate and compare to experiment
simulated = simulate(updated_sbml)
shared_variables.add("test_sbml_v12", updated_sbml)
print(simulated.head())
```
# Observation

## Code Stdout
       id_l6et     id_ep2m    id_wnsa     id_2ary  Time
0  1000.000000  200.000000   1.000000    1.000000   0.0
1  1010.058293  190.958393  27.278869   39.983314   0.8
2  1025.243355  176.918211  38.994811   78.838433   1.6
3  1045.361918  158.173646  44.095621  117.464437   2.4
4  1070.164573  135.150003  46.097929  155.685424   3.2

## Reminder

 ### Remaining Iterations for Interactions:
- Iterations: 1/20



### Available Global Variables
- `input_sbml_string`: Original incomplete model
- `experiment_history`: Results from all previous experiments (iteration_0, iteration_1, iteration_3)
- `shared_variables`: all variables you have saved from the previous iterations. (test_sbml_v1, test_sbml_v2, test_sbml_v3, test_sbml_v4, test_sbml_v5, test_sbml_v6, test_sbml_v7, test_sbml_v8, test_sbml_v10, test_sbml_v11, test_sbml_v12)

### Allowed libraires
['numpy', 'pandas', 'libsbml', 'math', 'scipy', 'jax', 'sklearn', 'io', 'traceback']


Please construct your response according to the thoughts-action markdown format.



# Iteration 20
## Thoughts

Even with a high inflow of `id_l6et`, a very weak autocatalytic step, and fast degradation of `id_wnsa`, the model still does not produce the sharp, repeated oscillations or bursts seen in the experimental data. Instead, `id_l6et` increases steadily, while `id_ep2m` and `id_wnsa` decrease, and `id_2ary` increases monotonically. This suggests that the current model structure is fundamentally missing a key mechanism—likely a more direct, delayed negative feedback or a more complex network topology (e.g., a cycle or additional intermediate).

Given that this is the last iteration, I will submit the model from the last attempt, as it is the most mechanistically plausible based on the available data and time constraints. The model includes:
- Inflow of `id_l6et`
- Nonlinear autocatalytic production of `id_ep2m` (inhibited by `id_wnsa`)
- Nonlinear conversion of `id_ep2m` to `id_2ary` and `id_wnsa`
- Fast degradation of `id_wnsa`

## Action

### Submit

```python
import libsbml
final_sbml = shared_variables.access("test_sbml_v12")
```
