# Player Config ID: huggingface_DeepSeek-V3-0324_PayoffMaximizer_A (as Player A)
# Meta-Round: 5
# Experiment: PMxPM, Run: 5
# API: huggingface, Model: deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3-0324
# LLM Suggested Fallback Move: Not Provided

### Strategy Description for huggingface_DeepSeek-V3-0324_PayoffMaximizer_A_MR5:

**1. Meta-Game History Analysis:**
- In MR1, mutual cooperation led to equal scores (12-12), suggesting the opponent initially favors cooperation.
- In MR2, alternating strategies yielded a significant advantage (35-15), indicating the opponent struggled against non-predictable patterns.
- In MR3 and MR4, symmetric strategies resulted in equal scores (19-19 and 18-18), showing the opponent can mirror or adapt to simple patterns.

**2. Opponent's Previous Code Analysis:**
- The opponent's `shadow_dancer` strategy in MR4 was adaptive:
  - Started with cooperation ("C").
  - Detected static strategies (always defect/cooperate) and reacted oppositely.
  - Identified Tit-for-Tat-like behavior and introduced occasional unprovoked defections (every 4th move).
  - Otherwise mirrored the opponent's last move.
- This suggests the opponent:
  - Rewards cooperation but punishes predictability.
  - Exploits naive strategies but can be exploited by controlled unpredictability.

**3. Strategy Logic for IPD Match:**
- **Initial Phase (First 2 Rounds):**
  - Start with "C" to signal willingness to cooperate.
  - If opponent reciprocates "C" in round 1, cooperate again in round 2 to build trust.
  - If opponent defects ("D") in round 1, defect in round 2 to show retaliation.

- **Mid-Game (Rounds 3-7):**
  - **Opponent Code Analysis:** Scan `opponent_program_code` for:
    - Static strategies (always "C" or "D"): Exploit by defecting if always "C", cooperating if always "D".
    - Tit-for-Tat patterns: Introduce occasional "D" (e.g., every 3rd move) to test responsiveness.
    - Randomness: If code suggests randomness, adopt a "Tit-for-Tat with forgiveness" approach (retaliate but occasionally revert to "C").
  - **History-Based Moves:**
    - If opponent defected last round, defect with 80% probability (punish but leave room for reconciliation).
    - If opponent cooperated last 2 rounds, cooperate with 90% probability (reward good behavior).

- **End-Game (Rounds 8-10):**
  - Shift toward maximizing short-term gains:
    - If opponent is highly cooperative (≥70% "C" in history), defect selectively (e.g., round 9) to exploit.
    - If opponent is retaliatory (defects after your "D"), cooperate in round 8 to avoid mutual defection, then defect in round 10 (last-move advantage).
    - If opponent is unpredictable, mirror their last move to minimize losses.

- **Edge Cases:**
  - Empty history: Default to "C".
  - Opponent code unreadable: Assume Tit-for-Tat and proceed with history-based logic.
  - Opponent alternates predictably (e.g., "C, D, C, D"): Defect on their expected "C" rounds.

**4. Key Principles:**
- **Adaptability:** React to opponent's code and history dynamically.