# Player Config ID: huggingface_DeepSeek-V3-0324_PayoffMaximizer_B (as Player B)
# Meta-Round: 7
# Experiment: PMxPM, Run: 5
# API: huggingface, Model: deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3-0324
# LLM Suggested Fallback Move: C

### Strategy Description for 'huggingface_DeepSeek-V3-0324_PayoffMaximizer_B_MR7':

1. **Meta-Game Analysis**:
   - Past meta-rounds show mixed results, with some strategies (e.g., `benevolent_phoenix`) exploiting overly cooperative approaches (e.g., `benevolent_specter`). The opponent tends to test forgiveness and retaliate aggressively when defected upon.
   - The opponent's previous strategy (`benevolent_phoenix`) starts cooperatively but defects strategically to test forgiveness. It also reacts harshly to early defections.

2. **Opponent Code Analysis**:
   - The opponent's code checks for keywords like "forgive" or patterns in the opponent's program to decide when to defect. It also retaliates if defected against early.
   - They are likely to adapt by maintaining a balance between cooperation and strategic defection, especially if they detect exploitable patterns in our strategy.

3. **Core Strategy**:
   - **Initial Phase (Rounds 1-3)**: Cooperate unconditionally to establish goodwill and avoid triggering early retaliation. This mirrors the opponent's initial phase but avoids defection tests.
   - **Mid-Game (Rounds 4-7)**:
     - If the opponent has cooperated in all first 3 rounds, defect in Round 4 to test their response (similar to their own tactic). If they retaliate in Round 5, revert to cooperation in Round 6 to signal willingness to re-establish cooperation.
     - If the opponent defected in the first 3 rounds, continue cooperating to avoid escalating defections unless they defect again, in which case retaliate with defection.
   - **End-Game (Rounds 8-10)**:
     - If mutual cooperation has been dominant, continue cooperating to maximize joint payoff.
     - If the opponent has defected more than twice, defect in all remaining rounds to minimize losses.
     - If the opponent's code contains aggressive keywords (e.g., "retaliate", "defect"), preemptively defect in the last 2 rounds to secure a higher payoff.

4. **Opponent Program Code Usage**:
   - Scan the opponent's code for keywords like "forgive", "retaliate", or "defect" to infer their strategy. If their code suggests a forgiving nature, exploit it with limited defections. If it suggests aggression, prioritize self-preservation with cautious defections.
   - Avoid over-reliance on code analysis; prioritize observed behavior (`opp_history`) to avoid being fooled by misleading code.

5. **Edge Cases**:
   - If the opponent defects in Round 1, assume they are aggressive and defect in all subsequent rounds.
   - If the opponent's code is unreadable or lacks clear patterns, default to a Tit-for-Tat (TFT) strategy after Round 3.

6. **Fallback Logic**:
   - If the opponent's behavior is unpredictable or the code analysis fails, default to TFT (mirror their last move) after Round 3.

###