<Question>
Suppose that $ABCD$ is a trapezoid in which $\overline{AD}|| \overline{BC}$.  Given $\overline{AC}\perp\overline{CD}$, $\overline{AC}$ bisects angle $\angle BAD$, and $[ABCD]=42$, then compute $[\triangle ACD]$.
</Question>

<think>
<Plan_1>
Okay, let's try to solve this trapezoid problem. Hmm, so we have trapezoid ABCD with AD parallel to BC. AC is perpendicular to CD, and AC bisects angle BAD. The area of the trapezoid is 42, and we need to find the area of triangle ACD.

First, let me sketch the trapezoid to visualize it better.

<prompt_1.1> Sketch the trapezoid based on the given conditions. </prompt_1.1>
</Plan_1>

<Execution_1>
<execution_1.1>
Since AD is parallel to BC, AD and BC are the two bases. Let me label the vertices so that AD is the lower base and BC is the upper base. So, points A and D are at the bottom, connected by AD, and points B and C are at the top, connected by BC. The legs of the trapezoid are AB and CD. Now, AC is a diagonal that is perpendicular to CD. So, diagonal AC is not only connecting A to C but is also forming a right angle with side CD. Additionally, AC bisects angle BAD, meaning that angle BAC is equal to angle CAD. That's interesting. The area of the entire trapezoid is 42, and we need the area of triangle ACD.
</execution_1.1>
</Execution_1>

<Plan_2>
Based on execution_1.1:
Let me note down the given information:

1. Trapezoid ABCD with AD || BC.
2. AC ⊥ CD.
3. AC bisects angle BAD.
4. Area of trapezoid ABCD is 42.
5. Find the area of triangle ACD.

First, since AD is parallel to BC, the height of the trapezoid is the distance between these two bases. Also, since AC is perpendicular to CD, triangle ACD is a right triangle with right angle at C. Wait, no, AC is perpendicular to CD, so triangle ACD has a right angle at C.
Therefore, the area of triangle ACD would be (1/2)*AC*CD.

But we need to find this area. However, the area of the trapezoid is given as 42. So, maybe we can relate the area of the trapezoid to the areas of the triangles formed by the diagonal AC.

<prompt_2.1> Consider how to relate the area of the trapezoid to the areas of the triangles formed by the diagonal AC. </prompt_2.1>

Since AC is an angle bisector of angle BAD, maybe we can use the angle bisector theorem.

<prompt_2.2> Use the angle bisector theorem to find a relationship between the sides of the trapezoid. </prompt_2.2>
-----

Alternatively, maybe coordinate geometry can help here. Let's assign coordinates to the points.

<prompt_2.3> Use coordinate geometry to assign coordinates to the points and verify the area of triangle ACD. </prompt_2.3>
</Plan_2>

<Execution_2>
<execution_2.1>
The trapezoid can be divided into two triangles by the diagonal AC: triangle ABC and triangle ACD. But since AD is parallel to BC, and AC is a diagonal, maybe these triangles have some relationship. However, since AC is an angle bisector and is perpendicular to CD, perhaps there's a way to express the areas in terms of the sides.
</execution_2.1>

<execution_2.2>
Wait, the angle bisector theorem states that the angle bisector divides the opposite side into segments proportional to the adjacent sides. But in this case, the angle bisector is AC, which is in the trapezoid. Wait, angle BAD is at vertex A, between BA and AD. The angle bisector AC would meet BD at some point, but in this case, AC is a diagonal connecting A to C. Hmm, maybe the angle bisector theorem can be applied here in some way.

Alternatively, since AD is parallel to BC, the trapezoid can be split into two triangles by the diagonal AC. The area of the trapezoid is the sum of the areas of triangles ABC and ACD. But since AC is perpendicular to CD, triangle ACD is right-angled, as we said earlier. So, area of ACD is (1/2)*AC*CD. Then, the area of triangle ABC would be (1/2)*AC*AB, but wait, is that true? Wait, no. Because in triangle ABC, if AC is the height, then AB would need to be the base. But unless AC is perpendicular to AB, which it isn't necessarily. Wait, but AC is perpendicular to CD, not necessarily to AB.

Hmm, so maybe that approach isn't directly helpful.

Alternatively, since AC is an angle bisector, maybe the ratio of the areas of triangles ABC and ACD is equal to the ratio of the adjacent sides. Wait, the angle bisector theorem says that the angle bisector divides the opposite side into segments proportional to the adjacent sides. But here, in triangle ABD, if AC is the angle bisector of angle BAD, then it divides BD into segments proportional to AB and AD. Wait, but ABCD is a trapezoid, not a triangle.
</execution_2.2>

<execution_2.3>
Let me place point A at the origin (0,0). Since AD is parallel to BC, and AC is perpendicular to CD, let's see.

Since AC is perpendicular to CD, and assuming point C is somewhere in the plane, let me define coordinates such that point A is at (0,0). Let’s suppose that AD is along the x-axis. So point D is at (d, 0) for some d > 0. Since AD is parallel to BC, BC must also be horizontal if AD is horizontal. So points B and C must lie somewhere above, with BC horizontal. Let me denote point B as (b, h) and point C as (c, h), since BC is parallel to AD, which is along the x-axis. The height of the trapezoid is h.

Now, AC is the diagonal from A(0,0) to C(c, h). The condition that AC is perpendicular to CD. Point D is (d,0), so CD is the vector from C to D: (d - c, -h). The vector AC is (c, h). For these two vectors to be perpendicular, their dot product must be zero:

(c)(d - c) + (h)(-h) = 0
=> c(d - c) - h² = 0
=> cd - c² - h² = 0
=> cd = c² + h²

That's equation (1).

Also, AC bisects angle BAD. Angle BAD is the angle at point A between BA and AD. Since AD is along the x-axis from A(0,0) to D(d,0), and BA is from A(0,0) to B(b,h). The angle bisector AC divides angle BAD into two equal angles. By the angle bisector theorem, the ratio of the adjacent sides is equal to the ratio of the opposite sides.

In triangle BAD, AC is the angle bisector of angle BAD. Therefore, by the angle bisector theorem:

AB / AD = BC / CD

Wait, let me recall the angle bisector theorem correctly. In a triangle, the angle bisector divides the opposite side into segments proportional to the adjacent sides. However, in this case, the angle bisector AC is not in triangle BAD but in the trapezoid. Wait, maybe we need to consider triangle BAD.

Wait, point C is not on BD, but since ABCD is a trapezoid, the sides AB and CD are the legs. Hmm, perhaps the angle bisector theorem isn't directly applicable here. Alternatively, maybe we can use vector methods or coordinate geometry to find the ratio.

Alternatively, since AC bisects angle BAD, the angle between BA and AC is equal to the angle between AC and AD. Let's compute these angles using slopes.

The slope of BA is (h - 0)/(b - 0) = h/b. The slope of AC is (h - 0)/(c - 0) = h/c. The slope of AD is 0, since it's along the x-axis.

The angle between BA and AC should equal the angle between AC and AD. The angle between BA and AC can be found using the tangent formula:

tan(theta1) = |(m2 - m1)/(1 + m1*m2)|

Where m1 is the slope of BA (h/b) and m2 is the slope of AC (h/c).

So tan(theta1) = |(h/c - h/b)/(1 + (h/b)(h/c))| = |(h(b - c)/bc)/(1 + h²/(bc))| = |h(b - c)/bc| / |(bc + h²)/bc| = |h(b - c)| / |bc + h²|

Similarly, the angle between AC and AD. Since AD is along the x-axis, the angle between AC and AD is just the angle of AC with the x-axis, which has tangent h/c. So tan(theta2) = h/c.

Since theta1 = theta2, their tangents are equal:

|h(b - c)| / |bc + h²| = h/c

Assuming all lengths are positive, we can drop the absolute value:

h(b - c)/(bc + h²) = h/c

Divide both sides by h:

(b - c)/(bc + h²) = 1/c

Multiply both sides by (bc + h²):

b - c = (bc + h²)/c

Multiply both sides by c:

c(b - c) = bc + h²

Left side: bc - c²

So:

bc - c² = bc + h²

Subtract bc from both sides:

-c² = h²

Which implies c² = -h², which is impossible since squares are non-negative. Hmm, that suggests a mistake in the setup.

Wait, maybe the angle between BA and AC is equal to the angle between AC and AD, but when computing tan(theta1), perhaps the direction matters. Since BA is going from A to B, which is in some direction, and AC is the angle bisector towards AD. Maybe the angle between BA and AC is equal to the angle between AC and AD, but when computing the tangent, the sign might matter. Alternatively, perhaps the absolute value was incorrectly removed. Let me check again.

Wait, when computing tan(theta1), which is the angle between BA and AC, the formula is |(m2 - m1)/(1 + m1*m2)|. So it's an absolute value. Similarly, tan(theta2) is just the slope of AC, which is h/c. Therefore, setting them equal:

|(h/c - h/b)/(1 + (h/c)(h/b))| = h/c

So:

|(h(b - c))/(bc + h²) * 1/(bc)| = h/c

Wait, no. Wait, let's recompute tan(theta1):

Slope of BA: m1 = h/b

Slope of AC: m2 = h/c

Then tan(theta1) = |(m2 - m1)/(1 + m1*m2)| = |(h/c - h/b)/(1 + (h/b)(h/c))| = |(h(b - c)/bc)/(1 + h²/(bc))| = |h(b - c)/bc| / |(bc + h²)/bc| = |h(b - c)| / |bc + h²|

So tan(theta1) = |h(b - c)| / (bc + h²) since all terms are positive (assuming b > c, which might not be the case). Wait, if AC is the angle bisector, then point C must lie between B and D? Not necessarily. Wait, in the trapezoid, since AD is parallel to BC, and AC is a diagonal, point C is on the top base BC. So, depending on the trapezoid, point C could be to the left or right of point B. Hmm, perhaps in this case, since AC is going from A to C and is perpendicular to CD, which is a leg, maybe point C is to the right of point D? Not sure. Maybe coordinates will help.

Alternatively, let's consider that in the angle bisector theorem, the ratio of the adjacent sides is equal to the ratio of the opposite sides. Wait, in triangle BAD, if AC is the angle bisector, then AB/AD = BC/CD. Wait, but BC is the length of the upper base, and CD is the leg. Wait, but in triangle BAD, the sides are BA, AD, and BD. But AC is not a side of triangle BAD; it's a line from A to C, which is outside triangle BAD. So maybe the angle bisector theorem doesn't apply directly here.

Alternatively, maybe we can parametrize the coordinates. Let's assume point A is at (0,0), D is at (d,0), B is at (b,h), and C is at (c,h). Then, since AC is perpendicular to CD, we have the dot product condition as before: c(d - c) - h² = 0. Also, AC bisects angle BAD. The angle between BA and AC is equal to the angle between AC and AD.

To express the angle bisector condition, perhaps we can use vectors. The direction vector of BA is (b, h), and the direction vector of AC is (c, h). The angle between BA and AC should equal the angle between AC and AD (which is along (1,0)). The cosine of the angle between BA and AC is (BA · AC)/(|BA||AC|) = (b*c + h*h)/(sqrt(b² + h²)*sqrt(c² + h²)). Similarly, the cosine of the angle between AC and AD is (AC · AD)/(|AC||AD|) = (c*1 + h*0)/(sqrt(c² + h²)*d) = c/(d*sqrt(c² + h²)). Since the angles are equal, their cosines are equal:

(b*c + h²)/(sqrt(b² + h²)*sqrt(c² + h²)) = c/(d*sqrt(c² + h²))

Multiply both sides by sqrt(c² + h²):

(b*c + h²)/(sqrt(b² + h²)) = c/d

Multiply both sides by sqrt(b² + h²):

b*c + h² = (c/d)*sqrt(b² + h²)

This seems complicated. Maybe square both sides to eliminate the square root:

(b*c + h²)^2 = (c²/d²)*(b² + h²)

Expand the left side:

b²c² + 2b*c*h² + h^4 = (c²/d²)(b² + h²)

Multiply both sides by d²:

d²(b²c² + 2b*c*h² + h^4) = c²(b² + h²)

This is getting quite involved. Maybe there's a better approach.
</execution_2.3>
</Execution_2>

<Plan_3>
Based on execution_2.2:
Let’s see. Since AC is an angle bisector and also perpendicular to CD, maybe triangle ACD is similar to some other triangle.

Alternatively, since AC is perpendicular to CD, triangle ACD is right-angled at C. Let's denote AC = h1 and CD = b1. Then area of ACD is (1/2)*h1*b1.

<prompt_3.1> Express the area of triangle ACD in terms of h1 and b1, and explore the relationship between triangles ABC and ACD. </prompt_3.1>

Wait, but how do we relate h1 and b1 to the trapezoid area?

<prompt_3.2> Explore the relationship between the sides of the trapezoid and the triangles formed by the diagonal AC. </prompt_3.2>
-----

Based on execution_2.3:
Alternatively, perhaps assign specific coordinates. Let me try again.

<prompt_3.3> Re-evaluate the coordinate geometry approach to verify the area of triangle ACD. </prompt_3.3>
</Plan_3>

<Execution_3>
<execution_3.1>
But we need more information.

Also, since AC is the angle bisector of angle BAD, maybe we can use the angle bisector properties. Let me denote angle BAC = angle CAD = θ. Then, in triangle ABC, if we can express some sides in terms of θ, and similarly in triangle ACD.

Alternatively, since ABCD is a trapezoid with AD || BC, the height of the trapezoid is the same as the height of triangles ABC and ACD. Wait, but triangle ABC is not necessarily right-angled. However, the area of the trapezoid is the average of the two bases times the height: [(AD + BC)/2]*h = 42. So if we can find AD, BC, and h, we can compute the area of triangle ACD.

But we need more relations. Let me note that AC is perpendicular to CD, so in triangle ACD, CD is the base, and the height is AC. So area of ACD is (1/2)*CD*AC. Similarly, in triangle ABC, if we can find its area, perhaps we can sum them to get 42.

But how to relate AC and CD to the trapezoid's dimensions.
</execution_3.1>

<execution_3.2>
Also, since AC bisects angle BAD, maybe we can use trigonometric relations. Let’s denote angle BAC = angle CAD = θ. Then angle BAD = 2θ.

In triangle ABC, if we can express sides in terms of θ, and in triangle ACD as well. But this might get complicated.
</execution_3.2>

<execution_3.3>
Let’s place point A at (0,0), D at (d,0), B at (0,h), and C at (c,h). Wait, but if AD is parallel to BC, then BC must also be horizontal. So if AD is from (0,0) to (d,0), then BC should be from (a,h) to (b,h) such that the vector BC is (b - a, 0). But since AD and BC are the two bases of the trapezoid, they must be parallel. Therefore, if AD is along the x-axis from (0,0) to (d,0), then BC must be a horizontal line segment at height h. Let me denote point B as (p,h) and point C as (q,h). Then vector BC is (q - p, 0), which is parallel to AD. The legs of the trapezoid are AB from (0,0) to (p,h) and CD from (d,0) to (q,h). 

Now, AC is the diagonal from A(0,0) to C(q,h). The condition that AC is perpendicular to CD. CD is from C(q,h) to D(d,0), so the vector CD is (d - q, -h). The vector AC is (q, h). Their dot product must be zero:

q*(d - q) + h*(-h) = 0
q*d - q² - h² = 0
q*d = q² + h²

Equation (1): q² - q*d + h² = 0.

Also, AC bisects angle BAD. Angle BAD is the angle at point A between BA and AD. BA is from A(0,0) to B(p,h), so vector BA is (p,h). AD is from A(0,0) to D(d,0), vector AD is (d,0). The angle bisector AC divides angle BAD into two equal angles. 

The angle between BA and AC should equal the angle between AC and AD. Let's compute the slopes or use vectors. The direction vector of BA is (p,h), AC is (q,h), and AD is (d,0). The angle between BA and AC can be found using the dot product:

cos(theta1) = (BA · AC) / (|BA| |AC|) = (p*q + h*h) / (sqrt(p² + h²) * sqrt(q² + h²))

The angle between AC and AD:

cos(theta2) = (AC · AD) / (|AC| |AD|) = (q*d + h*0) / (sqrt(q² + h²) * d) = q / sqrt(q² + h²)

Since theta1 = theta2, their cosines are equal:

(p*q + h²) / (sqrt(p² + h²) * sqrt(q² + h²)) = q / sqrt(q² + h²)

Multiply both sides by sqrt(q² + h²):

(p*q + h²) / sqrt(p² + h²) = q

Multiply both sides by sqrt(p² + h²):

p*q + h² = q*sqrt(p² + h²)

Square both sides:

(p*q + h²)^2 = q²*(p² + h²)

Expand left side:

p²*q² + 2*p*q*h² + h^4 = p²*q² + h²*q²

Subtract p²*q² from both sides:

2*p*q*h² + h^4 = h²*q²

Divide both sides by h² (assuming h ≠ 0):

2*p*q + h² = q²

So equation (2): q² - 2*p*q - h² = 0.

Now, from equation (1): q² = q*d - h². Substitute q² into equation (2):

(q*d - h²) - 2*p*q - h² = 0
q*d - h² - 2*p*q - h² = 0
q*d - 2*p*q - 2*h² = 0
q*(d - 2*p) = 2*h²

So equation (3): q = (2*h²)/(d - 2*p)

Now, we need another equation to relate these variables. The area of the trapezoid is 42. The area of a trapezoid is (1/2)*(sum of the bases)*height. The bases are AD and BC. AD has length d. BC has length q - p (since B is at (p,h) and C is at (q,h)). The height is h. Therefore:

(1/2)*(d + (q - p))*h = 42
=> (d + q - p)*h = 84

So equation (4): (d + q - p)*h = 84.

Now, let's see if we can express variables in terms of each other. From equation (3): q = 2*h²/(d - 2*p). Let's substitute q into equation (4):

d + (2*h²/(d - 2*p)) - p = 84/h

Multiply all terms by (d - 2*p) to eliminate the denominator:

d*(d - 2*p) + 2*h² - p*(d - 2*p) = (84/h)*(d - 2*p)

Expand:

d² - 2*d*p + 2*h² - d*p + 2*p² = (84/h)*(d - 2*p)

Combine like terms:

d² - 3*d*p + 2*p² + 2*h² = (84/h)*(d - 2*p)

This is getting quite complex. Maybe we need to find another relation. Let's recall that in equation (1): q² = q*d - h². Substitute q from equation (3):

[2*h²/(d - 2*p)]² = [2*h²/(d - 2*p)]*d - h²

Expand left side:

4*h^4/(d - 2*p)^2 = (2*d*h²)/(d - 2*p) - h²

Multiply both sides by (d - 2*p)^2 to eliminate denominators:

4*h^4 = 2*d*h²*(d - 2*p) - h²*(d - 2*p)^2

Let's expand the right side:

First term: 2*d*h²*(d - 2*p) = 2*d²*h² - 4*d*p*h²

Second term: -h²*(d - 2*p)^2 = -h²*(d² - 4*d*p + 4*p²) = -d²*h² + 4*d*p*h² - 4*p²*h²

Combine both terms:

2*d²*h² - 4*d*p*h² - d²*h² + 4*d*p*h² - 4*p²*h²

Simplify:

(2*d²*h² - d²*h²) + (-4*d*p*h² + 4*d*p*h²) + (-4*p²*h²)

= d²*h² - 4*p²*h²

So right side is d²*h² - 4*p²*h²

Therefore, equation becomes:

4*h^4 = d²*h² - 4*p²*h²

Divide both sides by h² (assuming h ≠ 0):

4*h² = d² - 4*p²

So:

d² - 4*p² = 4*h²

Equation (5): d² - 4*p² = 4*h²

Now, recall equation (4): (d + q - p)*h = 84. Let's substitute q from equation (3):

q = 2*h²/(d - 2*p)

So:

(d + 2*h²/(d - 2*p) - p)*h = 84

Let me denote s = d - 2*p. Then, q = 2*h²/s. Let's express equation (5) in terms of s:

From s = d - 2*p, we can write d = s + 2*p. Substitute into equation (5):

(s + 2*p)^2 - 4*p² = 4*h²

Expand:

s² + 4*s*p + 4*p² - 4*p² = s² + 4*s*p = 4*h²

Thus:

s² + 4*s*p = 4*h²

But from equation (3): q = 2*h²/s. Let's see if we can express h² in terms of s and p.

From equation (5):

s² + 4*s*p = 4*h² => h² = (s² + 4*s*p)/4

Now, substitute h² into equation (4):

(d + q - p)*h = 84

Express d, q in terms of s and p:

d = s + 2*p

q = 2*h²/s = 2*(s² + 4*s*p)/(4*s) = (s² + 4*s*p)/(2*s) = (s + 4*p)/2

Therefore, d + q - p = (s + 2*p) + (s + 4*p)/2 - p = (s + 2*p) + (s + 4*p)/2 - p

Convert to common denominator:

= (2*s + 4*p)/2 + (s + 4*p)/2 - (2*p)/2

= [2*s + 4*p + s + 4*p - 2*p]/2

= (3*s + 6*p)/2

Therefore, equation (4) becomes:

(3*s + 6*p)/2 * h = 84

Multiply both sides by 2:

(3*s + 6*p)*h = 168

Factor out 3:

3*(s + 2*p)*h = 168

Divide both sides by 3:

(s + 2*p)*h = 56

But s = d - 2*p, so s + 2*p = d. Therefore:

d*h = 56

So equation (6): d*h = 56

From equation (5): h² = (s² + 4*s*p)/4. But s = d - 2*p, so:

h² = [(d - 2*p)^2 + 4*(d - 2*p)*p]/4

Expand (d - 2*p)^2:

= d² - 4*d*p + 4*p²

So:

h² = [d² - 4*d*p + 4*p² + 4*d*p - 8*p²]/4

Simplify numerator:

d² - 4*d*p + 4*p² + 4*d*p - 8*p² = d² - 4*p²

Thus:

h² = (d² - 4*p²)/4

But from equation (6): d*h = 56 => h = 56/d

Therefore:

(56/d)^2 = (d² - 4*p²)/4

Multiply both sides by 4:

4*(56/d)^2 = d² - 4*p²

But from equation (5): d² - 4*p² = 4*h². Wait, but we already used that. Let's see:

Wait, equation (5) was d² - 4*p² = 4*h². So substituting h = 56/d:

4*h² = 4*(56/d)^2 / d²? Wait, no:

Wait, h = 56/d, so h² = (56/d)^2. Then 4*h² = 4*(56/d)^2. But equation (5) says d² - 4*p² = 4*h². Therefore:

d² - 4*p² = 4*(56/d)^2

But we also have from equation (6): d*h = 56 => h = 56/d. So:

d² - 4*p² = 4*(56/d)^2

But how does this help us? Maybe we can find p in terms of d.

Alternatively, let's recall that from equation (3): q = 2*h²/s, and s = d - 2*p. Let's express p in terms of s:

From s = d - 2*p => p = (d - s)/2

But s is a variable we introduced. Maybe we can relate s and h through equation (6): d*h = 56 => h = 56/d. Also, from equation (5):

s² + 4*s*p = 4*h²

But p = (d - s)/2, so substitute:

s² + 4*s*(d - s)/2 = 4*h²

Simplify:

s² + 2*s*(d - s) = 4*h²

= s² + 2*d*s - 2*s² = 4*h²

= -s² + 2*d*s = 4*h²

But h² = (d² - 4*p²)/4 from earlier. Let's substitute that:

-s² + 2*d*s = 4*(d² - 4*p²)/4

Simplify right side:

= d² - 4*p²

But p = (d - s)/2, so 4*p² = (d - s)^2

Therefore:

-s² + 2*d*s = d² - (d - s)^2

Expand (d - s)^2:

= d² - (d² - 2*d*s + s²) = d² - d² + 2*d*s - s² = 2*d*s - s²

Thus:

-s² + 2*d*s = 2*d*s - s²

Which simplifies to:

-s² + 2*d*s = 2*d*s - s²

Which is an identity. So this doesn't give new information. Therefore, we need another approach.

Let's recall that the area of the trapezoid is 42, which is (d + (q - p))*h / 2 = 42. Wait, earlier we had (d + q - p)*h = 84. So (d + q - p)*h = 84. From equation (6): d*h = 56. Therefore, (d + q - p)*h = 84 => 56 + (q - p)*h = 84 => (q - p)*h = 28.

So (q - p)*h = 28.

But q - p is the length of BC, which is the upper base. The lower base AD is length d. So the two bases are d and (q - p), and the height is h. The area is ((d + (q - p))/2)*h = 42, which is consistent with (d + q - p)*h = 84.

We already have d*h = 56, so (q - p)*h = 28. Let's note that.

From equation (3): q = 2*h²/s, and s = d - 2*p. Also, p = (d - s)/2. Therefore, q - p = 2*h²/s - (d - s)/2.

But (q - p)*h = 28:

[2*h²/s - (d - s)/2]*h = 28

Multiply through:

2*h³/s - (d - s)*h/2 = 28

But h = 56/d, so substitute h = 56/d:

2*(56/d)^3 /s - (d - s)*(56/d)/2 = 28

This is getting very complicated. Maybe there's a smarter substitution or a ratio we can exploit. Alternatively, perhaps assign numerical values to simplify.

Suppose we assume that h = 4. Then from equation (6): d*4 = 56 => d = 14. Then h² = 16. From equation (5): d² - 4*p² = 4*h² => 14² - 4*p² = 4*16 => 196 - 4*p² = 64 => 4*p² = 196 - 64 = 132 => p² = 33 => p = sqrt(33). Then q = 2*h²/s, where s = d - 2*p = 14 - 2*sqrt(33). Then q = 2*16/(14 - 2*sqrt(33)) = 32/(14 - 2*sqrt(33)). Rationalizing the denominator:

Multiply numerator and denominator by (14 + 2*sqrt(33)):

32*(14 + 2*sqrt(33)) / [(14)^2 - (2*sqrt(33))^2] = 32*(14 + 2*sqrt(33)) / [196 - 4*33] = 32*(14 + 2*sqrt(33)) / [196 - 132] = 32*(14 + 2*sqrt(33))/64 = (14 + 2*sqrt(33))/2 = 7 + sqrt(33)

Then q - p = [7 + sqrt(33)] - sqrt(33) = 7. Then (q - p)*h = 7*4 = 28, which matches. So this works. Then, the area of triangle ACD is (1/2)*AC*CD. AC is sqrt(q² + h²). From q = 7 + sqrt(33), h =4:

AC = sqrt( (7 + sqrt(33))² + 16 )

= sqrt(49 + 14*sqrt(33) + 33 + 16)

= sqrt(49 + 33 + 16 + 14*sqrt(33))

= sqrt(98 + 14*sqrt(33))

But CD is the length from C to D. Point C is at (q, h) = (7 + sqrt(33), 4), point D is at (14,0). So CD distance is sqrt( (14 - (7 + sqrt(33)))^2 + (0 - 4)^2 )

= sqrt( (7 - sqrt(33))^2 + 16 )

= sqrt(49 - 14*sqrt(33) + 33 + 16)

= sqrt(49 + 33 + 16 - 14*sqrt(33))

= sqrt(98 - 14*sqrt(33))

Therefore, area of ACD is (1/2)*sqrt(98 + 14*sqrt(33))*sqrt(98 - 14*sqrt(33)).

Multiply the square roots: sqrt[(98 +14√33)(98 -14√33)] = sqrt(98² - (14√33)^2) = sqrt(9604 - 14²*33) = sqrt(9604 - 196*33) = sqrt(9604 - 6468) = sqrt(3136) = 56.

Thus, area of ACD is (1/2)*56 = 28. Which matches our previous result.

Therefore, the area of triangle ACD is 28.
</execution_3.3>
</Execution_3>

<Final_answer>
Therefore, the final answer is $\boxed{28}$.
</Final_answer>
</think>