<Question>
What is $\left(4\dfrac{5}{8}\right)^{55} \cdot \left(\dfrac{8}{37}\right)^{55}$?
</Question>

<think>
<Plan_1>
Okay, so I need to calculate (4 and 5/8) raised to the 55th power multiplied by (8/37) raised to the 55th power. Hmm, that seems like a big exponent problem. Let me start by understanding what's given here.

<prompt_1.1> Rewrite the given expression (4 5/8)^55 · (8/37)^55 in a more compact form using properties of exponents. </prompt_1.1>
</Plan_1>

<Execution_1>
<execution_1.1>
First, the expression is (4 5/8)^55 multiplied by (8/37)^55. The numbers 4 5/8 and 8/37 are mixed numbers and fractions, respectively. Since both terms are raised to the same power, 55, maybe there's a way to combine them before calculating. 

Wait, when you multiply two exponents with the same power, you can combine the bases first. Like, a^m * b^m = (a*b)^m. Right? So maybe I can rewrite this as (4 5/8 * 8/37)^55. That might simplify things.
</execution_1.1>
</Execution_1>

<Plan_2>
Based on execution_1.1:
Let me check that.
Yes, because (a*b)^n = a^n * b^n, so reversing that, a^n * b^n = (a*b)^n. So that seems correct.

Now, let's compute 4 5/8 multiplied by 8/37. First, I need to convert the mixed number 4 5/8 to an improper fraction.

<prompt_2.1> Convert the mixed number 4 5/8 to an improper fraction and calculate the product of 4 5/8 and 8/37. </prompt_2.1>
-----

Wait, but maybe there's a smarter way to see this without converting to improper fractions? Let me think.

Alternatively, 4 5/8 is the same as (5*8 +5)/8 = 45/8.
-----

Alternatively, maybe there's a way to see this without converting to improper fractions? Let me think again.

<prompt_2.2> Re-evaluate the problem using exponent rules and confirm the result. </prompt_2.2>
-----

But let me confirm once more to avoid mistakes. Let's recompute 4 5/8 as 4 +5/8.
4 is 32/8, so 32/8 +5/8 =37/8. Wait, hold on! Wait, 4 is 32/8? Wait, 4 is 4/1. To convert to eighths, multiply numerator and denominator by 8: 4*8/8 =32/8. So 4 is 32/8. Then 4 +5/8 is 32/8 +5/8 =37/8. Wait, that's correct. So 4 5/8 is 37/8. Then multiplying by 8/37 gives (37/8)*(8/37) =1. So that's correct.

Therefore, the base is 1, and 1 raised to any power is 1.
</Plan_2>

<Execution_2>
<execution_2.1>
To convert 4 5/8: the whole number part is 4, which is 4*8/8 = 32/8. Adding the 5/8 gives 32/8 + 5/8 = 37/8. So 4 5/8 is equal to 37/8.

Now, multiplying 37/8 by 8/37. Let's see: (37/8) * (8/37). The 37 in the numerator cancels with the 37 in the denominator, and the 8 in the numerator cancels with the 8 in the denominator. So this simplifies to 1.
</execution_2.1>

<execution_2.2>
The original expression is (4 5/8)^55 * (8/37)^55. Notice that 4 5/8 is equal to (5*8 +5)/8? Wait, no. Wait, 4 is 32/8, so 4 5/8 is 32/8 +5/8 =37/8. Wait, that's the same as before. So 37/8 multiplied by 8/37 is indeed 1. So yes, the base is 1, so 1^55 is 1.
</execution_2.2>
</Execution_2>

<Plan_3>
Based on execution_2.1:
So then, the entire expression becomes 1^55, which is just 1. Wait, that seems too simple.
-----

Wait, but maybe I made a mistake in converting the mixed number? Let me double-check.
4 5/8 is 4 +5/8. Converting 4 to eighths: 4 =32/8. So 32/8 +5/8 =37/8. Correct. Then 37/8 multiplied by 8/37 is indeed (37*8)/(8*37) =1.
-----

But let me verify once more. Let's compute (4 5/8)*(8/37):

<prompt_3.1> Re-calculate the product (4 5/8) * (8/37) to verify the result. </prompt_3.1>

Therefore, raising 1 to any exponent is still 1.
So the answer is 1.
-----

Based on execution_2.2:
Alternatively, if I didn't see that cancellation, maybe I could have simplified the exponents first. But since they are the same exponent, combining the bases first is the way to go.

<prompt_3.2> Reflect on the solution and confirm the final answer. </prompt_3.2>

<execution_3.1>
First, 4 5/8 is 37/8. Multiply by 8/37: (37/8)*(8/37) = (37*8)/(8*37) = 296/296 =1. Yes, that's correct. So the product inside the exponent is 1, so 1^55 is 1.
</Plan_3>

<Execution_3>
<execution_3.1>
Convert 4 5/8 to improper fraction: (4*8 +5)/8 = (32 +5)/8 =37/8. Multiply by 8/37: (37/8)*(8/37) = (37*8)/(8*37) =1. So yes, that's 1.
</execution_3.1>

<execution_3.2>
But perhaps if there was a different exponent, that method wouldn't work as nicely. For example, if the exponents weren't the same, you couldn't combine them like that. But here, since both terms are raised to 55, combining them into a single base simplifies the calculation greatly. 

Therefore, after simplifying the base to 1, the result is 1. I think that's correct. Let me just check with a smaller exponent to verify. Suppose instead of 55, let's use exponent 1. Then (4 5/8)*(8/37) =1, as we saw. If exponent is 2, then (4 5/8)^2*(8/37)^2 would be (1)^2=1. So yes, it works for other exponents too. Therefore, the answer should be 1.
</execution_3.2>
</Execution_3>

<Final_answer>
Therefore, the final answer is $\boxed{1}$.
</Final_answer>
</think>