<Question>
A strictly increasing sequence of positive integers $a_1$, $a_2$, $a_3$, $\dots$ has the property that for every positive integer $k$, the subsequence $a_{2k-1}$, $a_{2k}$, $a_{2k+1}$ is geometric and the subsequence $a_{2k}$, $a_{2k+1}$, $a_{2k+2}$ is arithmetic. Suppose that $a_{13} = 2016$. Find $a_1$.
</Question>

<think>
<Plan_1>
Okay, let's try to tackle this problem step by step. It seems a bit complex at first glance, but maybe if I break it down, it will make more sense. So, we have a strictly increasing sequence of positive integers where two conditions are given for every positive integer k:

1. The subsequence a_{2k-1}, a_{2k}, a_{2k+1} is geometric.
2. The subsequence a_{2k}, a_{2k+1}, a_{2k+2} is arithmetic.

And we know that a_{13} = 2016. We need to find a_1.

First, let's recall what geometric and arithmetic sequences are.

<prompt_1.1> Recall the definitions of geometric and arithmetic sequences and how they apply to the given subsequences. </prompt_1.1>
-----

But let's check if this is possible.

Wait, but the sequence is strictly increasing. So, each term must be larger than the previous. Let's check the common difference.

<prompt_1.2> Analyze the implications of the common difference in the arithmetic sequence and how it affects the terms. </prompt_1.2>
</Plan_1>

<Execution_1>
<execution_1.1>
A geometric sequence has a common ratio, meaning each term is multiplied by a constant ratio r to get the next term. So, for the geometric subsequence a_{2k-1}, a_{2k}, a_{2k+1}, we have:

a_{2k} / a_{2k-1} = a_{2k+1} / a_{2k} ⇒ (a_{2k})² = a_{2k-1} * a_{2k+1}

Similarly, an arithmetic sequence has a common difference, so each term is obtained by adding a constant difference d to the previous term. For the arithmetic subsequence a_{2k}, a_{2k+1}, a_{2k+2}, we have:

a_{2k+1} - a_{2k} = a_{2k+2} - a_{2k+1} ⇒ 2a_{2k+1} = a_{2k} + a_{2k+2}
</execution_1.1>

<execution_1.2>
If a2 - a1 = d, then a3 = 2a2 (from the geometric sequence). So, a3 = 2a2. Then, a4 = 2a3 (from the geometric sequence), so a4 = 2a3 = 4a2. Then, for the arithmetic sequence a2, a3, a4, the common difference would be a3 - a2 = a4 - a3. Let's check: a3 - a2 = 2a2 - a2 = a2. Similarly, a4 - a3 = 4a2 - 2a2 = 2a2. Wait, but for it to be arithmetic, the differences must be equal. So, a3 - a2 should equal a4 - a3. But here, a3 - a2 = a2, and a4 - a3 = 2a2. So unless a2 = 0, which it can't be because the sequence is positive integers, this would not hold. Hmm, that's a problem. So my initial assumption that a4 = 2a3 is leading to a contradiction here. So maybe my approach is wrong.
</execution_1.2>
</Execution_1>

<Plan_2>
Based on execution_1.1:
So, we have these two conditions for each k. The problem gives us a_{13} = 2016, and we need to find a_1.

Since the sequence is strictly increasing, all terms must be positive integers, and each term must be larger than the previous. Let's see if we can express the terms in terms of a_1 and some common ratios or differences, maybe building a recursive relationship.

First, let's try to write out the first few terms to see if we can find a pattern.

<prompt_2.1> Write out the first few terms of the sequence to identify a pattern. </prompt_2.1>
</Plan_2>

<Execution_2>
<execution_2.1>
Starting with k = 1:

1. The subsequence a_1, a_2, a_3 is geometric.
2. The subsequence a_2, a_3, a_4 is arithmetic.

From the first condition (geometric sequence):

(a_2)^2 = a_1 * a_3 ⇒ a_3 = (a_2)^2 / a_1

Since all terms are positive integers, a_1 must divide (a_2)^2. Also, since the sequence is strictly increasing, a_3 > a_2 > a_1.

From the second condition (arithmetic sequence):

2a_3 = a_2 + a_4 ⇒ a_4 = 2a_3 - a_2

But a_3 is already expressed in terms of a_1 and a_2, so:

a_4 = 2*( (a_2)^2 / a_1 ) - a_2

Similarly, moving to k = 2:

1. The subsequence a_3, a_4, a_5 is geometric.
2. The subsequence a_4, a_5, a_6 is arithmetic.

From the first condition:

(a_4)^2 = a_3 * a_5 ⇒ a_5 = (a_4)^2 / a_3

But a_3 = (a_2)^2 / a_1 and a_4 = 2*( (a_2)^2 / a_1 ) - a_2, so substituting these in:

a_5 = [ (2*( (a_2)^2 / a_1 ) - a_2 )^2 ] / [ (a_2)^2 / a_1 ]

That seems complicated. Let's try to compute this step by step.

Let me denote a_2 as x and a_1 as a for simplicity. So, let a_1 = a, a_2 = x.

Then, a_3 = x² / a.

Then, a_4 = 2*(x² / a) - x.

Then, a_5 = [ (2*(x² / a) - x )² ] / (x² / a )

Let me compute numerator and denominator:

Numerator: [2*(x² / a) - x]^2 = [ (2x² - a x)/a ]^2 = (2x² - a x)^2 / a²

Denominator: x² / a

Thus, a_5 = [ (2x² - a x)^2 / a² ] / [ x² / a ] = (2x² - a x)^2 / (a²) * (a / x² ) = (2x² - a x)^2 / (a x² )

Let me expand the numerator:

(2x² - a x)^2 = 4x^4 - 4a x³ + a² x²

Thus, a_5 = (4x^4 - 4a x³ + a² x² ) / (a x² ) = (4x^4)/(a x² ) - (4a x³)/(a x² ) + (a² x² )/(a x² )

Simplify each term:

= 4x² / a - 4x + a

So, a_5 = (4x² / a ) - 4x + a

Hmm, that's a bit messy, but maybe manageable.

Now, moving on to the arithmetic condition for k=2:

The subsequence a_4, a_5, a_6 is arithmetic. So:

2a_5 = a_4 + a_6 ⇒ a_6 = 2a_5 - a_4

So, once we have a_5 in terms of a and x, we can compute a_6.
</execution_2.1>
</Execution_2>

<Plan_3>
Based on execution_2.1:
But this is getting complicated. Maybe we can find a relationship between a and x.

Alternatively, perhaps there's a pattern here. Let's see if we can find a recurrence relation.

<prompt_3.1> Explore the possibility of a recurrence relation in the sequence. </prompt_3.1>
</Plan_3>

<Execution_3>
<execution_3.1>
Looking at the first few terms:

a_1 = a

a_2 = x

a_3 = x² / a

a_4 = 2x² / a - x

a_5 = (4x² / a - 4x + a )

Hmm, perhaps there's a pattern here. Let's check if the terms can be expressed in terms of a and x with some coefficients.

Alternatively, maybe the sequence can be split into even and odd terms? Let's see:

Looking at the indices:

For k=1: terms 1,2,3

For k=2: terms 3,4,5

For k=3: terms 5,6,7

And so on. So each subsequent k adds two terms. Wait, but the problem states "for every positive integer k", so the sequence is covered by these overlapping triples. Therefore, each term after the second is determined by the previous terms.

Alternatively, maybe we can find a recursive formula for the terms. Let's see.

Suppose we have a_{2k-1}, a_{2k}, a_{2k+1} as geometric, so a_{2k+1} = (a_{2k})² / a_{2k-1}

Then, for the arithmetic part: a_{2k+2} = 2a_{2k+1} - a_{2k}

So, combining these two, we can write a_{2k+2} in terms of a_{2k} and a_{2k-1}:

a_{2k+2} = 2*( (a_{2k})² / a_{2k-1} ) - a_{2k}

So, if we let’s denote for each k, let’s define b_k = a_{2k-1} and c_k = a_{2k}. Then, the next odd term is a_{2k+1} = (c_k)^2 / b_k, and then a_{2k+2} = 2*( (c_k)^2 / b_k ) - c_k.

So, the odd terms are b_k, and the even terms are c_k, which are related by:

b_{k+1} = (c_k)^2 / b_k

c_{k+1} = 2*( (c_k)^2 / b_k ) - c_k

But since b_{k+1} = (c_k)^2 / b_k, we can substitute that into the second equation:

c_{k+1} = 2b_{k+1} - c_k

So, this gives us a recursive relationship between b_k and c_k.

Given that, perhaps we can model the sequence in terms of these b_k and c_k.

Given that the sequence is strictly increasing, all terms must be positive integers, so each b_k and c_k must be positive integers, and b_k < c_k < b_{k+1} < c_{k+1}, etc.
</execution_3.1>
</Execution_3>

<Plan_4>
Based on execution_3.1:
Wait, let's check:

Since the sequence is strictly increasing:

a1 < a2 < a3 < a4 < a5 < ... 

Given that a1 = b_1, a2 = c_1, a3 = (c_1)^2 / b_1, a4 = 2*(c_1)^2 / b_1 - c_1, etc.

Since a3 > a2, we have (c_1)^2 / b_1 > c_1 ⇒ (c_1)^2 > b_1 * c_1 ⇒ c_1 > b_1, which is true because a2 > a1.

Similarly, a4 must be greater than a3.

<prompt_4.1> Establish inequalities and conditions for the sequence to be strictly increasing. </prompt_4.1>

So, starting with a1 and a2, we can generate all subsequent terms. But since we need a13 = 2016, which is an odd term, we can express a13 in terms of b_7, since a13 = a_{2*7 -1} = b_7.

Given that, perhaps we can work backwards or find a pattern.

Alternatively, maybe we can assume that the ratios in the geometric sequences are integers.

<prompt_4.2> Consider the assumption that the ratios in the geometric sequences are integers. </prompt_4.2>
</Plan_4>

<Execution_4>
<execution_4.1>
Let's check:

a4 = 2a3 - a2 = 2*( (c_1)^2 / b_1 ) - c_1

We need a4 > a3 ⇒ 2*( (c_1)^2 / b_1 ) - c_1 > (c_1)^2 / b_1 ⇒ 2*( (c_1)^2 / b_1 ) - c_1 - (c_1)^2 / b_1 > 0 ⇒ (c_1)^2 / b_1 - c_1 > 0 ⇒ (c_1)^2 / b_1 > c_1 ⇒ c_1 / b_1 > 1 ⇒ c_1 > b_1, which is already true.

So, a4 is indeed greater than a3.
</execution_4.1>

<execution_4.2>
Since each geometric subsequence has a common ratio, let's denote for k=1, the ratio r1 = a2 / a1 = x / a. Then, a3 = a2 * r1 = x * r1. But since a3 must be an integer, r1 must be a rational number. Let's assume r1 is a rational number p/q where p and q are coprime integers. Then, x = a * p / q, so a must divide q, but since p and q are coprime, q must be 1. Therefore, r1 must be an integer. So, a2 = a1 * integer. Therefore, a2 is a multiple of a1.

Similarly, for the next geometric sequence (a3, a4, a5), the ratio r2 = a4 / a3. Since a4 = 2a3 - a2 (from the arithmetic condition), we have r2 = (2a3 - a2)/a3 = 2 - (a2 / a3). But a3 = (a2)^2 / a1, so a2 / a3 = a1 / a2. Therefore, r2 = 2 - (a1 / a2).

Since a4 must be an integer, and a3 is an integer, then r2 must be a rational number. But since a2 and a3 are integers, a1 / a2 is a rational number, so r2 is rational. However, for the geometric sequence, the ratio must be consistent. Therefore, r2 must be equal to a4 / a3 = (2a3 - a2)/a3 = 2 - (a2 / a3) = 2 - (a1 / a2). Let's denote this ratio as r2.

But since a4 must be an integer, and a3 is an integer, then r2 must be a rational number. However, since the sequence is strictly increasing, r2 must be greater than 1. Therefore, 2 - (a1 / a2) > 1 ⇒ 2 - 1 > (a1 / a2) ⇒ 1 > (a1 / a2) ⇒ a2 > a1, which is already true.

But perhaps we can set a1 = 1? Let's test that. Suppose a1 = 1. Then a2 must be an integer greater than 1. Let's let a2 = x. Then a3 = x² / 1 = x². Then a4 = 2x² - x. Since the sequence is strictly increasing, a4 must be greater than a3, so 2x² - x > x² ⇒ x² - x > 0 ⇒ x(x - 1) > 0. Since x is a positive integer greater than 1, this holds. Also, a4 must be an integer, which it is since x is integer.

Then, moving to the next geometric sequence (a3, a4, a5). The ratio r2 = a4 / a3 = (2x² - x)/x² = 2 - 1/x. For this to be a rational number, since x is integer, 2 - 1/x is rational. Then, a5 = a4 * r2 = (2x² - x)*(2 - 1/x). Let's compute that:

(2x² - x)*(2 - 1/x) = (2x² - x)*2 - (2x² - x)*(1/x) = 4x² - 2x - (2x²/x - x/x) = 4x² - 2x - (2x - 1) = 4x² - 2x - 2x + 1 = 4x² - 4x + 1

So, a5 = 4x² - 4x + 1. Let's check if this is an integer, which it is, since x is integer.

Then, the arithmetic sequence condition for k=2: a6 = 2a5 - a4 = 2*(4x² -4x +1) - (2x² -x) = 8x² -8x +2 -2x² +x = 6x² -7x +2

So, a6 = 6x² -7x +2

Then, moving to k=3: the geometric sequence (a5, a6, a7). The ratio r3 = a6 / a5 = (6x² -7x +2)/(4x² -4x +1). For this to be a rational number, since a6 and a5 are integers, the ratio must be a reduced fraction. Also, since the sequence is strictly increasing, a7 > a6, so r3 >1.

But this seems complicated. Let's see if there's a pattern or if x can be chosen such that these ratios become integers. Let's try with a small x. Let's start with a1=1, and see what x (a2) would be.


-----

Based on execution_4.2:
Let's check:

a1 =1, a2=2, a3=4, a4=2*4 -2=6, a5=4*4 -4*2 +1=16 -8 +1=9, a6=6*4 -7*2 +2=24 -14 +2=12, a7= (6x² -7x +2)*r3. Wait, but let's compute a7 properly.
</execution_4.2>
</Execution_4>

<Plan_5>
Based on execution_4.2:
Wait, for k=3, the geometric sequence is a5, a6, a7. So, a7 = a6 * (a6 / a5). So, ratio r3 = a6 / a5 = (6x² -7x +2)/(4x² -4x +1). Let's compute this for x=2:

<prompt_5.1> Calculate a7 for x=2 and verify if it is an integer. </prompt_5.1>
</Plan_5>

<Execution_5>
<execution_5.1>
x=2:

a5 =4*(4) -4*2 +1=16-8+1=9

a6=6*(4) -7*2 +2=24-14+2=12

So, r3=12/9=4/3

Then, a7=12*(4/3)=16

But a7 must be an integer, which it is. Then, a7=16.

Then, the arithmetic sequence for k=3: a6, a7, a8. So, a8=2a7 -a6=2*16 -12=32-12=20. So, a8=20.

Continuing, for k=4: geometric sequence a7, a8, a9. So, ratio r4= a8/a7=20/16=5/4

Thus, a9=20*(5/4)=25. Integer, good.

Arithmetic sequence a8, a9, a10: a10=2*25 -20=50-20=30
</execution_5.1>
</Execution_5>

<Plan_6>
Based on execution_5.1:
Similarly, k=5:

Geometric sequence a9, a10, a11: ratio=30/25=6/5

<prompt_6.1> Continue generating terms for x=2 and verify the sequence. </prompt_6.1>
</Plan_6>

<Execution_6>
<execution_6.1>
a11=30*(6/5)=36

Arithmetic sequence a10, a11, a12: a12=2*36 -30=72-30=42

k=6:

Geometric sequence a11, a12, a13: ratio=42/36=7/6

a13=36*(7/6)=42. Wait, but 36*(7/6)=42, so a13=42. But the problem states a13=2016. So, if x=2, a13=42. But we need a13=2016. So, perhaps scaling up the initial terms.

Wait, but in this case, the entire sequence is scaled by a factor. Let's see: if we set a1=1, a2=2, then a13=42. If we need a13=2016, then 42 * k =2016 ⇒ k=2016/42=48. So, if we scale the entire sequence by 48, then a1=48*1=48, a2=48*2=96, and so on, up to a13=42*48=2016. But does this hold?

Wait, but if we scale the initial terms by a factor, would the ratios remain the same? Let's check. If we scale a1 by k, then a2 must be scaled by k as well to maintain the ratio. Because a2 = r1 * a1. If a1 becomes k*a1, then a2 becomes k*a2 to keep the ratio r1. Then, a3 = (a2)^2 / a1 becomes (k*a2)^2 / (k*a1) = k*(a2)^2 / a1 = k*a3. Similarly, a4 = 2a3 -a2 becomes 2*(k*a3) - k*a2 = k*(2a3 -a2) = k*a4. So, yes, if we scale all terms by a factor k, the entire sequence is scaled by k. Therefore, if the sequence with a1=1 and a2=2 leads to a13=42, then scaling by 48 would give a13=2016. Therefore, the answer would be a1=48.
</execution_6.1>
</Execution_6>

<Plan_7>
Based on execution_6.1:
But let's verify this.

Wait, but in our earlier calculation with a1=1, a2=2, we found up to a13=42. So, if we scale each term by 48, then a1=48*1=48, a13=42*48=2016. Therefore, a1=48.

But is this valid? Let's confirm.

<prompt_7.1> Verify the solution by checking the consistency of scaling the sequence. </prompt_7.1>
</Plan_7>

<Execution_7>
<execution_7.1>
If the ratios remain consistent when scaling, then yes. Since the ratios are determined by the structure of the problem, which is independent of the absolute values. The ratios depend on the relationships between terms, which are preserved under scaling. Therefore, scaling the entire sequence by a constant factor would maintain the ratios and differences required by the geometric and arithmetic conditions. Therefore, if the sequence with a1=1 and a2=2 leads to a13=42, then scaling by 48 gives a13=2016, so a1=48.

But let's check another value of x to see if this approach works. Suppose x=3.

Then, a1=1, a2=3.

a3 = x² / a1 =9/1=9

a4=2*9 -3=18-3=15

a5=4*(9)^2 -4*3 +1=4*81 -12 +1=324-12+1=313

Wait, that seems too big. Then a6=6*(9)^2 -7*3 +2=6*81 -21 +2=486-21+2=467

Then, a7=(6x² -7x +2)/(4x² -4x +1) * a6. Let's compute the ratio:

(467)/(313) ≈1.491, which is not a rational number. Wait, but according to earlier steps, a7 should be an integer. Wait, but with x=3, maybe the ratios don't stay integers. Let's check.

Wait, a5=4x² -4x +1=4*9 -12 +1=36-12+1=25. Wait, earlier I miscalculated. Let me correct that.

Wait, for x=3:

a5=4*(3)^2 -4*3 +1=4*9 -12 +1=36-12+1=25

Then, a6=6*(3)^2 -7*3 +2=6*9 -21 +2=54-21+2=35

Then, ratio r3 =a6 /a5=35/25=7/5

Thus, a7=35*(7/5)=49

Then, a7=49

Arithmetic sequence a6, a7, a8: a8=2*49 -35=98-35=63

Then, for k=4: geometric sequence a7, a8, a9. Ratio r4=63/49=9/7

Thus, a9=63*(9/7)=81

Arithmetic sequence a8, a9, a10: a10=2*81 -63=162-63=99

k=5: geometric sequence a9, a10, a11. Ratio=99/81=11/9

a11=99*(11/9)=121

Arithmetic sequence a10, a11, a12: a12=2*121 -99=242-99=143

k=6: geometric sequence a11, a12, a13. Ratio=143/121=13/11

Thus, a13=121*(13/11)=143. Wait, but 121 divided by 11 is 11, so 11*13=143. So, a13=143. But if we scale the initial sequence by k=2016/143≈14.115, which is not an integer. Therefore, this suggests that x=3 might not lead to an integer a13. But in our previous case with x=2, a13=42, which divides 2016, giving k=48. However, with x=3, a13=143, which does not divide 2016. Therefore, x=2 is a valid case, but x=3 is not. Therefore, perhaps x must be chosen such that the final term a13 is a divisor of 2016. Since 2016=42*48, and 42 is the a13 when x=2, scaling by 48 gives a1=48. Therefore, the answer is 48.
</execution_7.1>
</Execution_7>

<Plan_8>
Based on execution_7.1:
But let's check if x=2 is the only possible value. Suppose x=4.

<prompt_8.1> Test other values of x to see if they lead to a valid sequence. </prompt_8.1>

But to confirm, let's see if there's a general formula.

<prompt_8.2> Develop a general formula for a13 in terms of a1 and verify it. </prompt_8.2>

Given that, since a13=2016=42*k, k=48, so a1=48*1=48.

But let's check another possible x. Suppose x=5.

<prompt_8.3> Verify the uniqueness of the solution by testing x=5. </prompt_8.3>
</Plan_8>

<Execution_8>
<execution_8.1>
Then, a3=25, a4=15, then a5=4*(15)^2 -4*5 +1=4*225 -20 +1=900-20+1=881. Then, a6=6*(15)^2 -7*5 +2=6*225 -35 +2=1350-35+2=1317. Then, ratio r3=1317/881≈1.495, which is not a rational number. Therefore, a7 would not be an integer. Hence, x=5 is invalid.

Similarly, x=2 gives a13=42, which is a factor of 2016. Therefore, scaling by 48 gives a1=48. Therefore, the answer is 48.
</execution_8.1>

<execution_8.2>
Looking back at the sequence when a1=1 and a2=x=2, we saw that a13=42. Let's see how that comes about. Let's list the terms:

a1=1

a2=2

a3=4

a4=6

a5=9

a6=12

a7=16

a8=20

a9=25

a10=30

a11=36

a12=42

a13=48

Wait, but earlier when I calculated with x=2, I got a13=42. Wait, maybe I made a mistake here. Let me recalculate:

Wait, with x=2:

a1=1

a2=2

a3=4

a4=2*4 -2=6

a5=4*4 -4*2 +1=16-8+1=9

a6=6*4 -7*2 +2=24-14+2=12

a7= (6x² -7x +2)/(4x² -4x +1) * a6. Wait, but for x=2:

a5=9, a6=12. Then, ratio r3=12/9=4/3. Then, a7=12*(4/3)=16

a8=2*16 -12=32-12=20

a9=20*(5/4)=25

a10=2*25 -20=30

a11=30*(6/5)=36

a12=2*36 -30=42

a13=2*42 -36=84-36=48

Ah, there we go. So, a13=48 when a1=1 and a2=2. Therefore, scaling by 42 gives a13=2016, so a1=48. But wait, 48*42=2016. So, 48*42=2016. Let's check: 48*40=1920, 48*2=96, so 1920+96=2016. Correct. Therefore, scaling the initial sequence by 48 gives the required a13=2016. Therefore, the first term a1=48*1=48.
</execution_8.2>

<execution_8.3>
Then, a1=1, a2=5.

a3=25/1=25

a4=2*25 -5=50-5=45

a5=4*(25)^2 -4*5 +1=4*625 -20 +1=2500-20+1=2481

a6=6*(25)^2 -7*5 +2=6*625 -35 +2=3750-35+2=3717

Then, ratio r3=3717/2481≈1.502, which is not a rational number. Therefore, a7 would not be an integer. So, x=5 is invalid. Therefore, x=2 seems to be the only value that gives integer terms up to a13=42. Thus, scaling factor k=48 gives a1=48, leading to a13=2016.

Therefore, the answer is 48.
</execution_8.3>
</Execution_8>

<Plan_9>
Based on execution_8.2, execution_8.3:
But let's confirm once more. If the entire sequence is scaled by 48, then each term a_n = 48 * b_n, where b_n is the term in the base sequence with a1=1, a2=2. Since in the base sequence, a13=48, scaling by 48 gives a13=48*48=2304, which is not 2016. Wait, wait, hold on. Wait, in the base sequence, when a1=1, a13=48.

<prompt_9.1> Verify the scaling process to ensure it results in the correct a13. </prompt_9.1>

But let's see why. Because in the base sequence, a13=48. So, if we scale each term by k, then a13=48*k. We need 48*k=2016 ⇒k=2016/48=42. Therefore, scaling factor is 42. Therefore, a1=1*42=42. But wait, but earlier when we scaled the entire sequence by 48, we thought a1=48. Wait, now I'm confused. Let's clarify.

<prompt_9.2> Clarify the scaling process and confirm the solution for a1. </prompt_9.2>
</Plan_9>

<Execution_9>
<execution_9.1>
Wait, no, earlier calculation with x=2 gave a13=48. Wait, no, in the previous calculation, with a1=1, a2=2, we found a13=48. Therefore, scaling by k=42 would give a13=42*48=2016. Therefore, a1=1*42=42. Wait, but that contradicts the earlier thought. Let me check again.

Wait, perhaps I made a miscalculation. Let's re-examine:

If the base sequence (with a1=1, a2=2) has a13=48, then to get a13=2016, we need to scale each term by 2016/48=42. Therefore, a1=1*42=42. Therefore, the answer would be 42. But wait, this contradicts the earlier conclusion of 48. So, where is the mistake here?

Wait, let's retrace. When we set a1=1 and a2=2, we found that a13=48. Therefore, if the original sequence with a1=1 has a13=48, then to get a13=2016, we need to scale the entire sequence by 2016/48=42. Therefore, a1=1*42=42. Therefore, the answer is 42. But earlier, I thought of scaling by 48, but that was a miscalculation.
</execution_9.1>

<execution_9.2>
If in the base sequence (a1=1, a2=2), a13=48. Then, to make a13=2016, we need to scale each term by 2016/48=42. Therefore, a1=1*42=42. Therefore, the first term would be 42. But wait, in the earlier calculation, when we scaled the entire sequence (base sequence) by 42, we get a1=42, a2=84, a3=126, etc. , leading to a13=2016. But according to the earlier step-by-step calculation, when we set a1=1 and a2=2, the sequence progresses to a13=48. Therefore, scaling by 42 gives a13=48*42=2016. Therefore, a1=1*42=42. Therefore, the answer should be 42. But earlier I thought 48. There's a discrepancy here. Let me check again.

Wait, in the first calculation, when a1=1, a2=2, we found a13=48. Then, to get a13=2016, we need to scale each term by 2016/48=42. Therefore, the first term becomes 1*42=42. Therefore, the answer is 42. However, in the earlier step-by-step calculation, when we set a1=1 and a2=2, the 13th term was 48, not 2. Therefore, scaling by 42 gives 48*42=2016. Therefore, a1=42. Therefore, the answer is 42.
</execution_9.2>
</Execution_9>

<Plan_10>
Based on execution_9.2:
But let's check again with the base sequence:

<prompt_10.1> Reconfirm the solution by recalculating the sequence with a1=42. </prompt_10.1>
</Plan_10>

<Execution_10>
<execution_10.1>
With a1=1, a2=2, the sequence progresses as follows:

a1=1

a2=2

a3=4

a4=6

a5=9

a6=12

a7=16

a8=20

a9=25

a10=30

a11=36

a12=42

a13=48

Yes, so a13=48. Therefore, scaling by 42 gives a13=48*42=2016. Therefore, a1=1*42=42. Therefore, the answer is 42. But this contradicts the earlier thought process where I concluded 48. So, there's a miscalculation here. The correct answer should be 42.
</execution_10.1>
</Execution_10>

<Plan_11>
Based on execution_10.1:
**Final Answer**
\boxed{42}
</Plan_11>

<Execution_11>
No prompt to execute.
</Execution_11>

<Final_answer>
Therefore, the final answer is $\boxed{42}$.
</Final_answer>
</think>