Okay, so I need to find the maximum value of e given that a, b, c, d, e are real numbers with two equations: the sum of the numbers is 8, and the sum of their squares is 16. Hmm, let's see. I remember that when dealing with sums and sums of squares, maybe I can use the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality or something related to that. Or maybe use Lagrange multipliers? Wait, but since there are multiple variables, maybe there's a simpler way.

Let me start by recalling that for real numbers, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality states that (a1*b1 + a2*b2 + ... + an*bn)^2 ≤ (a1^2 + a2^2 + ... + an^2)(b1^2 + b2^2 + ... + bn^2). But I'm not sure how to apply that directly here. Maybe another approach.

Alternatively, I remember that for variables with a fixed sum and a fixed sum of squares, the maximum value of one variable can be found by minimizing the sum of the squares of the other variables. Since we want to maximize e, we need to make the other variables a, b, c, d as small as possible in some sense, but their squares still add up. Wait, but how?

Let me think. If I fix e, then the sum of a + b + c + d is 8 - e, and the sum of their squares is 16 - e^2. So, maybe the problem reduces to finding the maximum e such that the sum of a + b + c + d = S and a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = Q has a solution. Then, the maximum value of e would be such that Q is minimized given S, because if the sum of squares is minimized, then the individual variables can be arranged to be as equal as possible, which might allow e to be as large as possible.

Wait, but how do we relate S and Q? There's a relationship between the sum of variables and the sum of their squares. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality can give a lower bound for the sum of squares. Specifically, (a + b + c + d)^2 ≤ 4*(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2). Let me check that. If I take (a + b + c + d)^2, that's equal to a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 + 2(ab + ac + ad + bc + bd + cd). On the other hand, 4*(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2) is 4 times the sum of squares. So, by Cauchy-Schwarz, (a + b + c + d)^2 ≤ 4*(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2). Let me verify with numbers. Suppose a = b = c = d = 1. Then the left side is 4^2 = 16, and the right side is 4*(4) = 16. So equality holds. If they are not equal, then the right side is larger. So, the inequality is correct.

So, applying this to our problem, since a + b + c + d = 8 - e, then (8 - e)^2 ≤ 4*(16 - e^2). Let me write that down:

(8 - e)^2 ≤ 4*(16 - e^2)

Expanding the left side:

64 - 16e + e^2 ≤ 64 - 4e^2

Bring all terms to one side:

64 - 16e + e^2 - 64 + 4e^2 ≤ 0

Simplify:

5e^2 - 16e ≤ 0

Factor:

e*(5e - 16) ≤ 0

So, the product is less than or equal to zero. This inequality holds when e is between 0 and 16/5. So, 0 ≤ e ≤ 16/5. Therefore, the maximum value of e is 16/5, which is 3.2.

Wait, but let me check if this is correct. Let me verify the steps again.

We have a + b + c + d = 8 - e, and a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = 16 - e^2. Applying Cauchy-Schwarz, (a + b + c + d)^2 ≤ 4*(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2). So substituting:

(8 - e)^2 ≤ 4*(16 - e^2)

Expanding the left side: 64 - 16e + e^2

Right side: 64 - 4e^2

Subtracting right side from left side:

(64 - 16e + e^2) - (64 - 4e^2) = 5e^2 -16e ≤ 0

So, 5e^2 -16e ≤ 0 → e(5e -16) ≤ 0. So, the roots are e=0 and e=16/5. The quadratic opens upwards, so the inequality is satisfied between the roots. Therefore, e ∈ [0, 16/5]. So maximum e is 16/5.

But wait, let me check if equality can be achieved. For Cauchy-Schwarz, equality holds when a = b = c = d. So, if a = b = c = d = (8 - e)/4.

Then, the sum of squares would be 4*((8 - e)/4)^2 = (8 - e)^2 / 4.

But we also have the sum of squares equal to 16 - e^2. Therefore, (8 - e)^2 / 4 = 16 - e^2.

Multiply both sides by 4:

(8 - e)^2 = 64 - 4e^2

Expand left side: 64 -16e + e^2 = 64 -4e^2

Bring all terms to left:

64 -16e + e^2 -64 +4e^2 = 5e^2 -16e =0

Which is the same equation as before. So, 5e^2 -16e =0 → e=0 or e=16/5. So, when e=16/5, then a=b=c=d=(8 -16/5)/4 = (40/5 -16/5)/4 = (24/5)/4 = 6/5. So, each of a,b,c,d is 6/5, and e=16/5. Then sum of squares is 4*(6/5)^2 + (16/5)^2 = 4*(36/25) + 256/25 = 144/25 + 256/25 = 400/25 =16. Which matches the given condition. So, equality is achieved. Therefore, 16/5 is attainable. Therefore, the maximum value of e is 16/5.

Therefore, the answer is 16/5. So, in boxed form, \boxed{\dfrac{16}{5}}.

But let me just think again. Suppose e is larger than 16/5, say 4. Then, 8 - e =4. Then sum of squares of a,b,c,d would be 16 -16=0. But sum of squares can't be zero unless all a,b,c,d are zero. But then sum of a +b +c +d=4, but they are all zero, so sum is zero, which is not 4. Contradiction. So, e cannot be 4. Therefore, 16/5 is indeed the maximum. So, I think this is correct.

Another way to think about it is using the method of Lagrange multipliers. Let me try that approach to verify.

We need to maximize e subject to the constraints:

a + b + c + d + e =8,

a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 + e^2 =16.

Using Lagrange multipliers, the gradients of the objective function and the constraints should be proportional. Let's set up the Lagrangian:

L = e + λ1*(8 - a - b - c - d - e) + λ2*(16 - a^2 - b^2 - c^2 - d^2 - e^2)

Taking partial derivatives with respect to a, b, c, d, e, and set them to zero.

∂L/∂a = -λ1 -2λ2*a =0

Similarly, ∂L/∂b = -λ1 -2λ2*b=0

∂L/∂c = -λ1 -2λ2*c=0

∂L/∂d = -λ1 -2λ2*d=0

∂L/∂e =1 -λ1 -2λ2*e=0

From the first four equations, we have:

-λ1 -2λ2*a=0 → λ1 = -2λ2*a

Similarly, λ1 = -2λ2*b, λ1 = -2λ2*c, λ1 = -2λ2*d

Therefore, a = b = c = d. Let's denote a = b = c = d = k.

Then, from the sum constraint:

4k + e =8 → e =8 -4k

From the sum of squares constraint:

4k^2 + e^2 =16

Substituting e:

4k^2 + (8 -4k)^2 =16

Expand (8 -4k)^2: 64 -64k +16k^2

So, 4k^2 +64 -64k +16k^2 =16

Combine terms:

20k^2 -64k +64 =16

Subtract 16:

20k^2 -64k +48 =0

Divide by 4:

5k^2 -16k +12 =0

Solve quadratic equation:

k = [16 ± sqrt(256 -240)] /10 = [16 ± sqrt(16)] /10 = [16 ±4]/10

So, k = (16 +4)/10=20/10=2 or k=(16-4)/10=12/10=6/5.

If k=2, then e=8 -4*2=0. If k=6/5, then e=8 -4*(6/5)=8 -24/5=40/5 -24/5=16/5. So, the maximum e is 16/5. Therefore, same result. So, this method also gives the same answer. Therefore, this confirms that 16/5 is indeed the maximum value of e. Therefore, the final answer is \boxed{\dfrac{16}{5}}.
Therefore, the maximum value of $e$ is $\boxed{\dfrac{16}{5}}$.
</think>