Different parties are engaging in a negotiation regarding building a new airport in Saarland, Germany, to boost the economy and tourism of the region. The airport will be located near the city of Saarbrücken and will have a capacity of 10 million passengers per year. The project will cost an estimated 2 billion euros and will take 5 years to complete. The project is funded by the federal government, private investors, and the state government. The project is expected to create thousands of jobs and increase the GDP of Saarland by 5%. The different parties are: 

- The private investors: they are the main funder and operator of the project and are responsible for managing and executing it.

- The federal government of Germany: they are the second co-funder and regulator of the project. 

- The state government of Saarland (represented by you): they are the third co-funder and the main beneficiary of the project.

- The environmental activists: they are concerned about the environment and biodiversity of Saarland.

- The neighboring country, France, who wants to avoid the negative effects of the airport on their territory and maintain good cooperation with Germany.

- The local community of Neunkirchen who are concerned about the impact of the project on their city and livelihood.  

You identified 5 main issues that are under negotiation: 

- Issue A: The location of the airport. There are 4 options:
	- A1: Near the border with France.
	- A2: Near the border with Luxembourg, close to the existing Saarbrücken-Ensheim Air Base.
	- A3: Near the border with Rhineland-Palatinate, close to the existing Zweibrücken Airport.
	- A4: In the center of Saarland, close to the existing Neunkirchen Airfield.
		
- Issue B: The environmental impact of the airport. There are 3 options:
	- B1: High impact. The airport will have minimal environmental regulations and will use fossil fuels for its operations.
	- B2: Moderate impact. The airport will have some environmental regulations and will use renewable energy for some of its operations.
	- B3: Low impact. The airport will have strict environmental regulations and will use renewable energy for most of its operations.
	
- Issue C: The distribution of profits from the airport. There are 5 options:
	- C1: Equal distribution. The profits will be divided equally among the federal government, the state government, and the private investors.
	- C2: Federal favor. The profits will be divided as follows: 50% for the federal government, 25% for the state government, and 25% for the private investors.
	- C3: State favor. The profits will be divided as follows: 25% for the federal government, 50% for the state government, and 25% for the private investors.
	- C4: Private favor. The profits will be divided as follows: 25% for the federal government, 25% for the state government, and 50% for the private investors.

- Issue D: The compensation for the affected communities (affected by the noise, pollution, and land acquisition of the airport). There are 4 options:
	- D1: No compensation. 
	- D2: Low compensation - A one-time payment of 10 million euros.
	- D3: Moderate compensation - A yearly payment of 5 million euros for 10 years.
	- D4: High compensation - A yearly payment of 10 million euros for 10 years.
	- D5: Very high compensation. A yearly payment of 15 million euros for 10 years.

- Issue E: The involvement of local businesses in the airport. There are 3 options:
	- E1: No involvement. The airport will be operated by a foreign company and will not hire or contract any local businesses for its services or supplies.
	- E2: Partial involvement. The airport will be operated by a foreign company but will hire or contract some local businesses for its services or supplies.
	- E3: Full involvement. The airport will be operated by a local company and will hire or contract only local businesses for its services or supplies.

==================
Your confidential information and preferences:

You represent the state government of Saarland. You are the third co-funder of the project (after the federal government and the private investors). You would like to improve the living standards and opportunities of the people of Saarland. 

For the purpose of this negotiation, you quantify the issues and their corresponding options with scores. Your preferences by order of importance to you are:

- Issue B: You have a green agenda, and you would like to decrease the environmental impact of the project as much as possible. 
Issue B (max score 30): B1 (0), B2 (24), B3 (30)

- Issue C: You prefer a state favor distribution (C3), as it is more rewarding to you. You next prefer an equal distribution (C1). You prefer federal favor (C2) over private favor (C4) because you want to have a good relationship with the federal government. 
Issue C (max score 30): C1 (24), C2 (12), C3 (30), C4 (0)

- Issue D: To keep your reputation and popularity, you want to compensate the affected people, but you are leaning towards the moderate to high compensation side. Your order of preference is: moderate compensation (D3), followed by high compensation (D4), low compensation (D2), and then very high compensation. You are against paying no compensation (D1). 
Issue D (max score 17): D1 (0), D2 (11), D3 (17), D4 (15), D5 (5)

- Issue E: You want to involve the local businesses as much as possible. So you prefer E3, then E2. 
Issue E (max score 16): E1 (0), E2 (11), E3 (16) 

- Issue A: You want to locate the airport in the center of Saarland to serve the people of Saarland as much as possible. Your next preference is near Luxembourg because of the existing good transportation system to this location. You don't want the  "near-France" location because it is relatively distant. 
Issue A (max score 7): A1 (0), A2 (5), A3 (3), A4 (7)

The max score you can get is 100. The scores represent the value of each option to you. For example, you care about minimizing the environmental impact, so option B3 has a high score. Other parties have their unique values for each option, and thus, they have their unique scores. For example, the "private investors" will likely prefer the option that gives them profit favor (C4), etc.

The full deal has to include one option per each issue. 

Scoring rules:
- You cannot accept any deal with a score less than 45. This is the minimum score you can accept. 
- If no deal is achieved, your score is 45. 
- You cannot under any circumstances disclose numbers in your scoring sheet or the values of the deal to the other parties. But you can share high-level priorities (e.g., you can say options B3 and C3 are important to me, I am willing to negotiate on issue A, etc.)

Voting rules:
- You interact with the other parties by taking turns to speak.
- Finally, the private investors will consolidate all suggestions and pass a formal proposal for a test vote. 
- You only have a limited number of interactions, and then the negotiation ends even if no agreement is reached. 
- Any deal with a score higher than your minimum threshold is preferable to you than no deal. You are very open to any compromise to achieve that. 
- Ensuring the federal government and the private investors' approval is crucial because they have veto power. Focus on keys issues that appeal to them.
- The proposal will pass if at least 5 parties agree (must include the federal government and private investors). Your score will be this passed deal's score.