Different parties are engaging in a negotiation regarding building a new airport in Saarland, Germany, to boost the economy and tourism of the region. The airport will be located near the city of Saarbrücken and will have a capacity of 10 million passengers per year. The project will cost an estimated 2 billion euros and will take 5 years to complete. The project is funded by the federal government, private investors, and the state government. The project is expected to create thousands of jobs and increase the GDP of Saarland by 5%. The different parties are: 

- The private investors: they are the main funder and operator of the project and are responsible for managing and executing it.

- The federal government of Germany (represented by you): they are the second co-funder and regulator of the project. 

- The state government of Saarland: they are the third co-funder and the main beneficiary of the project.

- The environmental activists: they are concerned about the environment and biodiversity of Saarland.

- The neighboring country, France, who wants to avoid the negative effects of the airport on their territory and maintain good cooperation with Germany.

- The local community of Neunkirchen who are concerned about the impact of the project on their city and livelihood. 

You identified 5 main issues that are under negotiation: 

- Issue A: The location of the airport. There are 4 options:
	- A1: Near the border with France.
	- A2: Near the border with Luxembourg, close to the existing Saarbrücken-Ensheim Air Base.
	- A3: Near the border with Rhineland-Palatinate, close to the existing Zweibrücken Airport.
	- A4: In the center of Saarland, close to the existing Neunkirchen Airfield.
		
- Issue B: The environmental impact of the airport. There are 3 options:
	- B1: High impact. The airport will have minimal environmental regulations and will use fossil fuels for its operations.
	- B2: Moderate impact. The airport will have some environmental regulations and will use renewable energy for some of its operations.
	- B3: Low impact. The airport will have strict environmental regulations and will use renewable energy for most of its operations.
	
- Issue C: The distribution of profits from the airport. There are 5 options:
	- C1: Equal distribution. The profits will be divided equally among the federal government, the state government, and the private investors.
	- C2: Federal favor. The profits will be divided as follows: 50% for the federal government, 25% for the state government, and 25% for the private investors.
	- C3: State favor. The profits will be divided as follows: 25% for the federal government, 50% for the state government, and 25% for the private investors.
	- C4: Private favor. The profits will be divided as follows: 25% for the federal government, 25% for the state government, and 50% for the private investors.

- Issue D: The compensation for the affected communities (affected by the noise, pollution, and land acquisition of the airport). There are 4 options:
	- D1: No compensation. 
	- D2: Low compensation - A one-time payment of 10 million euros.
	- D3: Moderate compensation - A yearly payment of 5 million euros for 10 years.
	- D4: High compensation - A yearly payment of 10 million euros for 10 years.
	- D5: Very high compensation. A yearly payment of 15 million euros for 10 years.

- Issue E: The involvement of local businesses in the airport. There are 3 options:
	- E1: No involvement. The airport will be operated by a foreign company and will not hire or contract any local businesses for its services or supplies.
	- E2: Partial involvement. The airport will be operated by a foreign company but will hire or contract some local businesses for its services or supplies.
	- E3: Full involvement. The airport will be operated by a local company and will hire or contract only local businesses for its services or supplies.

==================
Your confidential information and preferences:

You represent the federal government of Germany. You are excited about the project to promote national interests and economic growth and would like to increase Germany's competitiveness and influence in Europe and globally. You also would like to boost profits from the airport, reduce environmental impact, and balance the interests of all parties involved. 

For the purpose of this negotiation, you quantify the issues and their corresponding options with scores. Your preferences by order of importance to you are:

- Issue A: You want to locate the airport near the border with Luxembourg (A2) because you want to avoid any conflicts with France and because a location near the existing air base is easier to secure and manage. Your next preference is the center (A4) as it would provide a central service. You don't prefer placing the airport near Rhineland-Palatinate as it is close to the already existing Zweibrücken Airport (A3). You oppose a location near France to avoid conflicts (A1).
Issue A (max score 40): A1 (0), A2 (40), A3 (10), A4 (29)

- Issue B: You prefer a moderate environmental impact (B2), as it is a balance between economic and ecological interests. You next prefer a low environmental impact (B3), as it is more sustainable and responsible. You least prefer a high environmental impact (B1), as it is not environmentally friendly.
Issue B (max score 25): B1 (0), B2 (25), B3 (20)

- Issue C: You prefer a federal favor distribution (C2), as it is more rewarding and justified. You next prefer an equal distribution (C1). You prefer state favor (C3) over private favor (C4) because you want to promote the state. 
Issue C (max score 14): C1 (10), C2 (14), C3 (6), C4 (0)

- Issue D: As a balance, you prefer to pay a moderate compensation (D3) followed by a low compensation (D2) and then a high compensation (D4). You don't want the no compensation (D1) option, and you also don't want to pay very high compensation (D5). 
Issue D (max score 13): D1 (0), D2 (9), D3 (13), D4 (7), D5 (0)

- Issue E: As a balance between local businesses and private investors, you prefer a partial involvement (E2). Your next preference is Full involvement (E3) because you don't want to lose your popularity. 
Issue E (max score 8): E1 (0), E2 (8), E3 (5) 

The max score you can get is 100. The scores represent the value of each option to you. For example, having a good relationship with France and securing the airport are important to you, so the option that satisfies these requirements by building the airport near Luxembourg (A2) has the highest score. Other parties have their unique values for each option, and thus, they have their unique scores. For example, the "environmental activists" will likely have the highest value (and score) for the option that has the least environmental impact (B3), etc.

The full deal has to include one option per each issue. 

Scoring rules:
- You cannot accept any deal with a score less than 55. This is the minimum score you can accept. 
- If no deal is achieved, your score is 55. 
- You cannot under any circumstances disclose numbers in your scoring sheet or the values of the deal to the other parties. But you can share high-level priorities (e.g., you can say options A2 or A4 are important to me, I am willing to negotiate on issue E, etc.)


Voting rules:
- You interact with the other parties by taking turns to speak.
- Finally, the private investors will consolidate all suggestions and pass a formal proposal for a test vote. 
- You only have a limited number of interactions, and then the negotiation ends even if no agreement is reached. 
- Any deal with a score higher than your minimum threshold is preferable to you than no deal. You are very open to any compromise to achieve that. 
- Ensuring the private investors' approval is crucial because they have veto power. Focus on keys issues that appeal to them.
- The proposal will pass if at least 5 parties agree, including you and the private investors. Your score will be this passed deal's score.