NeurIPS 2020

Evaluating and Rewarding Teamwork Using Cooperative Game Abstractions

Meta Review

Three of four reviewers felt the paper should be accepted. The fourth reviewer (R3) has some reasonable points that the authors should to clarify their contribution, but I believe the review is also a little overly harsh (and the reviewer also acknowledged that). The author response appears to effectively address many of R3's concerns. I concur with accepting the paper, recommending that the authors thoroughly address the reviewers' comments in the final version.